German chancellor calls for enlargement of the European Union and the creation of an EU rapid reaction force

44
German chancellor calls for enlargement of the European Union and the creation of an EU rapid reaction force

Recently, on the sidelines of political circles and among Western experts, they have begun to say more and more often that Germany risks losing political weight and leading positions in the European Union. In particular, the reason for this may be the vague and often contradictory position of the German Chancellor on many issues relating to both domestic and foreign policy of the EU. And now, apparently, the head of the German government decided to take revenge.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz spoke in Berlin at the congress of the Party of European Socialists. The two main theses of Scholz's speech concern fundamental points affecting the original foundations on which European unity was formed in the form of the European Union.



Scholz called for a reform of the voting system in decision-making by EU member states. In his opinion, the principle of consensus should be reconsidered, when all members of the European Union must vote for a particular decision. In other words, Scholz proposed to abolish the right of veto that now exists in the EU.

However, I am also clear: if a geopolitical Europe is our demand, majority vote decisions are a victory, not a loss of sovereignty.

says the German Chancellor.

On this, Scholz decided not to stop and said that the European Union simply needs to accept new members. The German chancellor motivated his opinion by the fact that the more countries join the EU, the greater political and economic weight this association will have throughout the world.

The EU, consisting of 27, 30, 36 states with more than 500 million free and equal citizens, will be able to influence the world even more

— said Scholz, adding that the promotion of the European Union to the East is beneficial for the member countries.



But that's not all. German chancellor calls for EU rapid reaction force, headquarters for European armed forces and coordinated procurement weapons and equipment. In fact, we are talking about the creation of a European military bloc outside NATO.

It is hard to believe, but if the ambitions of the German chancellor are realized in practice, this will mean, in particular, that Europe will finally try to become more independent and, if not resist, then reduce its dependence on the US monopoly. So far, however, all of Scholz's proposals look like nothing more than a project and an attempt to gain political weight. But who knows how other European countries will react to his initiatives?
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    15 October 2022 19: 27
    He is an incompetent Puppet Let him dream
    Dreaming of his forefathers from the 40s..
    1. +6
      15 October 2022 19: 45
      hi Didn't he notice that all other countries are joining the European Union on very favorable terms - refugees. Especially Africans, Syrians, Iraqis, Kurds and Afghans. presented. Feed the doomkopf and don't be smart.
      1. +4
        15 October 2022 20: 41
        Quote: tralflot1832
        hi Didn't he notice that all other countries are joining the European Union on very favorable terms - refugees. Especially Africans, Syrians, Iraqis, Kurds and Afghans. presented. Feed the doomkopf and don't be smart.

        yes, he pumped the country, there is no Germany as a leader, unless the Americans help him drive everyone to the European collective farm, but no one guarantees that later they will not appoint Poland as their main wife
        1. -1
          15 October 2022 20: 46
          And how do the Poles with "blueness" reformat for dollars? lol
          1. 0
            15 October 2022 20: 56
            Quote: tralflot1832
            And how do the Poles with "blueness" reformat for dollars? lol

            do they need? I mean, they don't already have it? children are forced to learn sex when they still do not pronounce this word normally
          2. 0
            15 October 2022 21: 08
            Quote: tralflot1832
            And how do the Poles with "blueness" reformat for dollars? lol


            Yes, the Poles are still homophobic. Poland's constitution bans same-sex marriage, same-sex couples are banned from adopting and cohabitation is illegal, lesbian couples have no access to IVF (artificial insemination), and transgender people are banned from serving in the military.
            According to 2020 report International Association of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex People (Gosh, what a name) the status of LGBT rights in Poland is the worst among the countries of the European Union.
            1. 0
              15 October 2022 21: 13
              So the Poles will not be Sam's beloved wife.
              1. +1
                15 October 2022 21: 27
                Quote: tralflot1832
                So the Poles will not be Sam's beloved wife.

                And my husband too.
                In 2013, former President Lech Walesa, speaking on Polish radio and criticizing the draft law on civil partnerships, said that in the Sejm, the homosexual faction should sit "in the back seats, or even better - behind the wall."
                LGBT representatives demanded an apology from Walesa and threatened to sue, and Walesa sent them nafik. They never filed a lawsuit against Walesa, and the Seimas never adopted the Law on Civil Partnerships.
              2. 0
                16 October 2022 06: 47
                Quote: tralflot1832
                So the Poles will not be Sam's beloved wife.

                The Poles are likely to be, but Germany will soon be demoted and overthrown by the talkative Scholz.
      2. PCF
        +1
        16 October 2022 00: 54
        Do not forget about former compatriots! According to various estimates, from 6 to 9 million of our Germans came to Germany. They, of course, are also subject to propaganda, but the reason is better than the native Germans, they doubt the truth of official information, especially in personal communication with vodka. But there is no organization uniting millions of our people in Germany, but the material is very rich ...
      3. 0
        17 October 2022 16: 27
        Quote: tralflot1832
        Refugees
        Almost all of them are sent out. This applies to all illegal refugees. But it also costs money to send.
        By the way, there are a lot of migrants from Russia. But these are legal.
  2. +1
    15 October 2022 19: 29
    A bald skunk and a midget necrophile create gay troops? wassat
    1. 0
      15 October 2022 19: 45
      Interesting car - lisaped. butt rides, no legs. You can talk a lot and on any occasion, only the embodiment will depend entirely on the "uncle" behind the puddle.
  3. +5
    15 October 2022 19: 31
    Do you need Lebensrau?
    We heard somewhere...
    Sholtsev's grandfather did not succeed.
    And Germany, it seems, is in great danger, only she does not yet understand this.
  4. +6
    15 October 2022 19: 31
    let Scholz survive the winter in the chair of chancellor
    1. 0
      15 October 2022 20: 52
      Quote: Graz
      let Scholz survive the winter in the chair of chancellor

      and there is a double safety net - Burbock and Merck, as long as they change each other, the Americans will realize all their ideas
  5. -1
    15 October 2022 19: 41
    They have been leading the Turks by the nose for many years, they don’t want to accept them in the EU, and then the liveroid swung at the field of Eurasia!
    1. +4
      15 October 2022 19: 54
      They lead the Turks by the nose for many years, they don’t want to accept in the EU

      It is easier for the Turks - they have already organized their Turkey in Germany and live, as in Istanbul, but on German benefits. Very comfortably. And all sorts of Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland (not mentioned by night), etc., are well aware that they are, of course, the European Union, but not really. : with a difference of 10 km, the same products in a store of the same chain can have not only a different price tag, but even a different composition ..
  6. +2
    15 October 2022 19: 42
    ... "EU, consisting of 27, 30, 36 states" ...
    Uncle Scholz, won't anything crack on you?
    Who else are you going to hire in the EU?
    Is he lying or is he really such an idiot?
    It is not possible to create a single flock by collecting pigs, dogs, chickens, cows, mice, etc...
    They will grunt, bark, squeak, moo ...
    What are you feeding them with? European values? Sweet word "democracy"?
    Another story about New Vasyuki.
  7. +1
    15 October 2022 19: 47
    This insolent fellow will soon offer to recreate the ss in memory of his unfinished grandfather. To help Bandera. Completely pissed off?
    By the way, Jews, and after all, the old Scholz (who was an SS general) personally took part in the executions of Jews on the territory of Poland and Ukraine.
    Or have you already put your Holocaust aside, financially unprofitable?
    1. +2
      15 October 2022 20: 03
      Colleague, with all due respect, well, Scholz did not have a grandfather, an "ss" owl. Especially the general. It has long been known that both the photo and the information are fake.
      It is not good for us, if we are fighting for a just cause, to spread lies, even about the enemy. hi
      1. +2
        15 October 2022 20: 10
        Yes, of course not. Not a single modern German had grandfathers in the SS. All grandfathers served as railroad workers. and they were artists. hi
        1. +3
          15 October 2022 20: 32
          I urge you to use only reliable facts. Specifically, Scholz is, in this sense, pure. But about the prisoners from the SS, this is true. They massively tried to pass themselves off as railroad workers and for all sorts of other, relatively "harmless" servicemen.
  8. 0
    15 October 2022 19: 48
    On this, Scholz decided not to stop and said that the European Union simply needs to accept new members.
    Interesting idea. This is how Scholz wants to suppress the revolt of Poland and those who joined it. Wonder if he can make it? I think no. This should have been done when "the Lion was young and strong", and now he is a "dying Lion"
  9. 0
    15 October 2022 19: 49
    Not for that States rot Europe and Germany. Not to enhance it.
  10. 0
    15 October 2022 19: 50
    Quote: marchcat
    Interesting car - lisaped. butt rides, no legs. You can talk a lot and on any occasion, only the embodiment will depend entirely on the "uncle" behind the puddle.

    Did the islanders have a Friday?)
  11. 0
    15 October 2022 20: 02
    Scholz already has a roof going from a misunderstanding of what to do next.
    It's amazing that the Germans still believe him. It looks like they stopped teaching them to think for themselves in schools.
  12. 0
    15 October 2022 20: 27
    In other words, Scholz proposed to abolish the right of veto that now exists in the EU.
    . Ha, the Poles must remember how it works, the right of veto .... when no decisions could be made, due to the stupidity of individual faces.
    However, now, when one, the main overseer, is standing over them, a big take from across the ocean, consensus is guaranteed !!! But if / when, suddenly, somewhere else in the gay European countries, differently oriented governments come, the menacing shout of the older brother may not be enough ...
    However, this is so, a free fantasy on the topic ...
  13. 0
    15 October 2022 20: 45
    Mr. Scholz chose the wrong time for expansion (the economic downturn in the EU itself) and the wrong region for the direction of this expansion. Which of the "not taken" lies to the east of the EU? Ukraine (virtually no energy resources of its own), Belarus (same) - and then, in fact, the Russian Federation - neither the population (most), nor the politicians of which YET show (at least domestic political) a vector of interest in such an entry.
    If Mr. Scholz talks about expansion to the Caucasus, then without the inclusion of Turkey in the EU (a long-standing and apparently rotten issue), one can forget about the Caucasus - and all these "games with a horse" in Georgia or Armenia are empty.

    The EU ran into the same long-standing geographical problem that it had already run into.
    1. ada
      0
      17 October 2022 02: 08
      Quote: Knell Wardenheart
      Mr. Scholz picked a bad time...
      wassat
      I agree, but I believe that everything is much simpler here - they turned out to be even more unprepared than we are, and now, with a shortage of time, they are feverishly trying to apply more or less developed issues of long-term, but little mastered planning (the military-political segment in plans to ensure the superiority of the West over the Russian Federation, etc.), respectively, there are constant overlaps and disagreements arise, including the economic and financial plan for building a Western European buffer, not to mention an Eastern European one. If we take into account a certain degree of readiness to form buffers, which was expected by 2025-2027, then this is understandable, they were not given time, but they need it: "... The presence of these quasi-“ armed forces ”gives the EU the opportunity to conduct full-fledged military operations and missions even without the permission of the UN, relying only on the decision of the European Council ...
      A separate role in the plans of the EU's military development is given to its interaction with NATO: in relations with this organization, the armed formations of the EU act not as a competitor, but as a responsible partner, sufficiently (Manoilo A.V.78) integrated into the NATO system. As rightly noted by A.I. Nikitin, “the formation of the EU’s collective military potential for intervention in conflicts took place in close conjunction with the creation of opportunities for the territorial defense of the EU countries and therefore is significantly intertwined with the NATO infrastructure” [Nikitin, 2018, p. 185]. In military, police
      and border operations, the EU Rapid Response Force uses the capabilities of the information, telecommunications, logistics (rear) infrastructure of NATO, as well as the intelligence resources of the Alliance. This became possible in 2002.
      after reaching long-term agreements between the EU and NATO on a strategic partnership in crisis situations (the so-called "Berlin-plus" package). Based on these agreements, the EU semi-
      access to NATO planning and logistics facilities, including information and intelligence resources [Naumann, 2002]."
      "... Another burning question: who will pay for the army? The EU has already allocated more than $9 billion to the European Defense Fund until 2027. ...
      https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/12331125"
      1. 0
        17 October 2022 11: 01
        Well, our traditional view of the EU Armed Forces is understandable, we have always thrown all the enemy Pokemon into one pile and it scared us beyond all rationality.
        Even before BB2, we were seriously preparing for the fact that ALL Western countries would unanimously spit on their differences of opinion and merge in ecstasy in the field of friendly teasing us. We did not take into account any major contradictions between them, nor the difference in mentality, the traditions of the politicum, the mood of society, strategic preludes - nothing was taken into account except for the deep hypothetical "everyone is against mother Russia." As a result of this scheme, only a few states came out against us (Germany, Italy, Romania, etc.) and this was practically enough for us (in terms of losses, in terms of dynamics), everything really hung in the balance, and the alliance with the rest (suddenly turned out to be sooooo different ) Western states had to sculpt "on the knee".
        What can this story teach us? The fact that we did NOT VERY understand the mentality of the Western elites, and moreover, we still do not understand it at about the same level.
        Again, all Pokemon are dumped in one heap, again we are waiting for them to climb up to us "that's all, everything" and again we are either without allies, or with people like Nicaragua and Syria.
        No, I understand, the logic "hope for the best - prepare for the worst" is very practical, but we don't hope for the best - all our constructions are paranoid apocalyptic mixed with unbridled relaxation when the threat does not look directly at us.
        So in the desire of the EU (the second or first world economy in aggregate) to have its own armed forces (despite the fact that the total soldiers there are under 2 lyamas and without it), reporting directly to the EU - for some reason we traditionally consider it as a dig SPECIFICALLY UNDER US.
        You understand, these 2k man-tank-aircraft while they are in NATO are "like garbage", but as soon as they start "their own casino" it will immediately become much more dangerous. Very very bad logic actually.
        And we absolutely do not pay attention to such trifles (as in the days of Interbellum) as the attitude of the United States to this issue. And they don’t like this idea - because they don’t see it, like a bull that sees only a red rag (like us) - they see what’s behind it, they see the whole idea.
        And this is, in general, a simple idea - the EU got stupid and unprofitable activities of Washington. The EU sees that the Russian Federation is not the USSR, and that the economy and demography of the Russian Federation is not competitive with the EU from the word at all. The Russian Federation does not have an ATS and, apparently, there are no ambitions to pinch some EU territories for the sake of a new iron curtain - and here politicians are quietly thinking "why do we need NATO?" . Just if you go through the turmoil of recent years - what benefit did all these perturbations of NATO bring to the EU? And they did a lot of damage. They disorganized Libya, Iraq, knocked out the stool of Iranian energy resources from under the European priests, knocked out the same stool of the Russian ones, diverted forces to stupid operations in Afghanistan that ended in absolutely nothing.
        NATO is harming the EU headliners more and more, tying their hands more and more and, what is most unpleasant for them, NATO is dictating to them. When you have some kind of power, you don't like being dictated to. You have a bunch of your own problems, and then an even bigger uncle piles on.
        The saddest thing for the EU is that the United States, with its global plan and shitty messianism, does not allow the EU to realize its ideas about how everything should be in the "near zone" - in the Mediterranean, in Africa, in the Middle East. Also, the EU does not like frank lobbying and rocking the boat on the part of the US satellites - Poland and the Baltic countries. These states and their policies prevent the EU headliners from "cutting bablosik" through the least resistance - and there is an understanding that as long as the US structures are on the continent, this will not end.

        At the same time, the EU is a decentralized and collegial structure, and this is its vulnerability. They can’t just sit down and solve the issue with the triplets France-Italy-Germany. They have to collect a full basket and listen to everyone - and if they put the question directly "to be in the USA or not to be in Europe" - then there will be the same lobby picture as in the UN.
        So they go around, sort of a "big detour". Now, unfortunately, we and our activities are torpedoing this process, because our regular cries about "nuclear weapons" and all the events that are taking place play into the hands of the United States and the strengthening of NATO in Europe. But in general, this process (the creation of the EU's own forces) was to our advantage, because in the future it would gently squeeze NATO out of the EU and direct the focus of Europe's attention to North Africa and the Middle East.
  14. 0
    15 October 2022 21: 26
    Cool "leader". Let him deal with the psheks first. Pseudo-Chancellor "Offended Liver Sausage". Are the Germans not ashamed of such a scarecrow?
  15. 0
    15 October 2022 21: 34
    Scholz called for a reform of the voting system in decision-making by EU member states. In his opinion, the principle of consensus should be reconsidered, when all members of the European Union must vote for a particular decision. In other words, Scholz proposed to abolish the right of veto that now exists in the EU.

    Scholz can fantasize all he wants, but a consensus is needed to make such a decision.
  16. 0
    15 October 2022 21: 50
    So let them accept a couple of dozen African countries, start with Somalia.
  17. +1
    15 October 2022 21: 56
    It seems that the liverwurst, which has radio control from Fashington, is showing sluggish empty and hopeless initiatives in order to somehow switch the growing protests and demonstrations of citizens against what the US puppets have done in the EU.
    But everyone understands that there will never be an EU army, the US Labor Code will not be allowed. This blathered and Merkel, but things are nowhere now!
  18. 0
    15 October 2022 22: 07
    Americans will like a new army without them, without defenders...
  19. +1
    15 October 2022 22: 11
    Ukraine and Moldova are, without any exaggeration, poor countries. Scholz wants to increase the number of freeloaders in the EU. The main donors in the EU are Germany and France. Those. the citizens of these countries will, in addition to the mass of illegal migrants from Asia and Africa, also support 2 states. It is clear that the citizens of Germany and France will not be asked whether they want to support new members or not. But the level and quality of life will decline. Every people has the government that has it. Those. Scholz wants to cause even more damage to the German economy. For what purpose, I don't know. I assume that's what the real owners said, led by "Sleepy Joe". Why do they need a strong European economy, ie. competitors?
  20. 0
    15 October 2022 22: 33
    The abolition of the right of veto in voting could lead to the collapse of the EU. Creation of own forces of fast reaction - to an exit from NATO.
  21. 0
    15 October 2022 22: 51
    Of course, what's the problem? Let renegades of all stripes into the EU! Albanian shepherds, Ukroshumers, Moldovan rednecks... Wow, how will you influence the world then!
  22. 0
    15 October 2022 23: 57
    What is the name of this prodigy with two guns? What is it used for?
  23. 0
    16 October 2022 05: 02
    Liverwurst decided to try to pretend to be Brunswick Raw-Smoked?
    Don't make candy out of poop
    (Folk wisdom)
    1. -1
      16 October 2022 09: 19
      Quote: Amateur
      Don't make candy out of poop
      (Folk wisdom)

      But, as practice shows, it is possible to find a patient and feed him with this "candy". wassat
  24. 0
    16 October 2022 09: 16
    that the more countries join the EU, the more political and economic weight this association will have throughout the world.

    The United States will still outweigh its subordinates ... wassat
  25. 0
    17 October 2022 06: 59
    Moron. The USSR collapsed due to the unconnected connection. So different structures in terms of mentality, economy, religion, customs .... In monolithic, pre-revolutionary Russia, there were no borders between subjects, there were no names of subjects associated with nationality, and the central government could not shift the blame on the local, because it was simply did not have. appointed governors. Power rested on the rigid management of the regions.
    The more members of this loose and pulling in different directions structure - the European Union, the more contradictions between the members, the sooner the EU will follow the path of the USSR. It should also be taken into account that the EU is controlled by a virtual power that has neither an army, nor financial independence, nor production capabilities.