Fox News: The US and allies are at the limit in terms of supplying modern weapons to Ukraine

61
Fox News: The US and allies are at the limit in terms of supplying modern weapons to Ukraine

U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin signaled this week that the United States and its NATO allies have nearly exhausted their ability to provide Ukraine with modern weapons. In Washington, they are increasingly talking about reducing stocks to such a level that in the event of a further escalation of the conflict in Europe, the US army will have nothing to fight and protect its allies with. Given that just further military assistance to Kyiv could provoke a direct confrontation between NATO and Russia.

Problems with the stocks of modern types of weapons in the arsenals of the United States and Western countries are confirmed by experts interviewed by Fox News.



The United States and allies in this regard are at the limit of their capabilities.

At a press conference on Wednesday, Austin was asked if the US and other countries are concerned that their own stockpiles of munitions are so limited that they can no longer help Ukraine as much as they used to. Austin declined to answer, stressing that there is a desire to give Ukraine what it needs, but did not confirm whether there is a real opportunity for this. The US Secretary of Defense lamented that Ukraine was using up ammunition provided by its Western allies too quickly.

Mark Kansian, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, who spent seven years working on US Department of Defense procurement issues, gave his assessment based on inventory levels, industrial capacity and information from the Biden administration, and concluded that the US has a "limited" capability. deliveries of HIMARS, Javelin, Stinger and M777 howitzers.

According to the expert, this means that now America will be able to supply Ukraine with only cheaper weapons from old stocks and not at all what Kyiv requests. Kansian said he takes Austin's comments as a sign that the days of the US providing Ukraine with its best weapons are over. Among other things, delivery times will increase, Kyiv will begin to receive weapons purchased in other countries. This will lead to compatibility issues between different types of equipment.

Other experts interviewed by Fox News believe that the slowdown and reduction in the supply of modern weapons to Ukraine is due to the Biden administration's fears of a further escalation of the conflict and the direct involvement of the United States in it. The White House seriously fears that Moscow may decide to use nuclear weapons in order to hasten the end of the military campaign in its favor.

The evolution of the US position comes just as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is stepping up pressure on Western countries to provide more weapons. Just this week, Zelenskiy asked for air defense systems that could fend off recent Russian missile strikes on the Ukrainian capital.

- writes the author of Fox News.

But, apparently, the United States is the least interested in the wishes of the President of Ukraine. The American leadership will make decisions on further support for Kyiv, based on purely their own mercantile interests. And at some point they will begin to contradict the aspirations and requirements of the Ukrainian leadership.

In other words, the Biden administration still has more power to give Ukraine more weapons, but chooses not to.

— concludes the author of the article.

In any case, no matter what the American media writes and no matter how much they talk about depleted stocks of weapons, the US and other NATO countries methodically continue to provide military assistance to the Kyiv regime. They do not give everything and not in the volumes that Kyiv requests, but they do. And the flow of weapons and equipment has not yet dried up. This is the objective reality today - regardless of the opinion of overseas experts.
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +32
    15 October 2022 17: 40
    This seems to me to be disinformation. what They want to cheat.
    1. +14
      15 October 2022 17: 45
      There is technology, the old truth, like a fool's shag. In the desert, under the sun, it is waiting in the wings. I don’t know where they got the M60 tanks. I don’t think they sawed
      1. 0
        21 October 2022 21: 57
        In fact, this whole topic seems to me, about limited opportunities, about the last boxes of shells, the last rocket - this is more our clowns are inflating. In fact, they do not reduce the volume of supplies to banderlogs at all. Well, misinformation is poured in about here is a decrease. Yet simple. They don't even need to do special analytics. According to the accounting reports of the RF Ministry of Defense, they look at how much was destroyed per day and plan the next delivery with an understanding of how much to restore and how much to strengthen. Ours think for them. It is high time for the Defense Ministry to switch to coverage of the operation according to the Podolyaki principle. He did not name the number, he monitored the map according to the situation. All. And this bookkeeping, analytics. One and a half million downed maize crops are worthless to people. Just some extra questions. Before the war, they talked about one and a half hang gliders in service, but here it doesn’t fit at all)
    2. +13
      15 October 2022 17: 48
      This seems to me to be disinformation.
      Outright misinformation ... They got drunk because Russia would block the "grain feeder" from Odessa for them, so they sculpt whatever they got. And it is necessary to block this feeder. Everyone has long known that the grain from Odessa goes to its owners, who in Ukraine bought up the land on which this grain is grown. And the owners of these Ukrainian lands are mainly NATO countries - our sworn "partners" who stuff the Ukronazis with their weapons. Who do you have to be to allow these sworn "partners" to receive food from Ukraine in exchange for weapons?! In our military-political leadership, is everyone entirely "ginotized" by sworn "partners"?
      1. Eug
        +3
        15 October 2022 18: 48
        Not countries, the world's largest corporations - Cargill, Dupont, Monsanto, surprised that there is no Bayer -- but perhaps is present through shareholdings.
      2. 0
        17 October 2022 11: 00
        another key point is that they realized that this is a long time, and driving something modern and in large quantities is expensive and fraught, so they are preparing everyone for the idea that they will continue to supply something cheaper and older
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +1
      15 October 2022 19: 30
      100% tryndezzh from the United States, and they deliberately threw Afghanistan, this is for everyone to believe in their weakness, and on the Ukrainian side they both delivered weapons and will continue to deliver, and they really deceive them, weapons, in the United States! hi
      1. +1
        15 October 2022 19: 38
        100% tryndezzh from the United States, and they deliberately threw Afghanistan, this is for everyone to believe in their weakness, and on the Ukrainian side they both delivered weapons and will continue to deliver, and they really deceive them, weapons, in the United States!

        In Afghanistan, weapons were thrown so that the fire would not die out. China is nearby and Russia is also not far away. The farther from the USA it blazes, the calmer it is.
        1. +3
          15 October 2022 19: 46
          That is why their policy of razbolansa in the world exists!
          When everyone is fighting among themselves, it is easier for them to count the profits and wear the crown hi
    5. for
      -2
      15 October 2022 21: 47
      Quote: Ural_engineer
      This seems to me to be disinformation.

      If you wrote that there are a lot of weapons, you also wrote that misinformation.
    6. +3
      16 October 2022 02: 16
      Same opinion too! Yes, on the contrary, they are increasing the production of various types of weapons, hiring more workers, reopening factories! The military-industrial magnates are only rubbing their paws! There, on the contrary, everything goes on increasing!
    7. 0
      16 October 2022 18: 42
      You're right . There was a figure for the production of F35. We have already made 700 pieces. Obviously, there are no problems with the production of other weapons. And that's just for the US. In the US, I can quickly promote the military-industrial complex. World War II is an example.
  2. +19
    15 October 2022 17: 40
    Fox News: The US and allies are at the limit in terms of supplying modern weapons to Ukraine
    A fairy tale told for the night ... In which the main thing is not to believe us
  3. -9
    15 October 2022 17: 41
    They disperse their military-industrial complex, you can supply spears to forelocks, they still don’t know how to do anything and they will also spit in response wassat
    1. +8
      15 October 2022 17: 56
      Oh, unfortunately they do. Much to my regret. And 8 months of NWO is a good example of this.
      And NATO and "all sorts of different Swedes" have enough weapons for any whim for more than one Ukraine.
      Ps minus not mine ...
    2. -2
      15 October 2022 18: 04
      Quote from Buyan
      Accelerate their military-industrial complex,

      this is the right idea, the bourgeoisie came to the conclusion that they cannot master Russia without launching factories, the only question is whether they can master it with the launch of factories)
    3. -1
      16 October 2022 13: 09
      Quote from Buyan
      They disperse their military-industrial complex, you can supply spears to forelocks, they still don’t know how to do anything and they will also spit in response wassat

      So you need to be sent under their spears, you will tell from the front edge of the NWO about spears and arrows
  4. +7
    15 October 2022 17: 47
    I don’t believe it either, there are still plenty of weapons there, by the way, besides the Himars, they haven’t supplied anything modern yet, they’re lying to lull our vigilance.
    1. +5
      15 October 2022 17: 57
      There are also deliveries of modern ones. For example, kamikaze drones "Penknives" (as they seem to be translated) are the development of the last four years. And this is so, offhand.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      15 October 2022 18: 26
      Quote from Silver99
      I don’t believe it either, there are still plenty of weapons there, by the way, besides the Himars, they haven’t supplied anything modern yet, they’re lying to lull our vigilance.

      why are they more modern than 777?
      1. +2
        15 October 2022 19: 26
        Quote: poquello
        why are they more modern than 777?

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1299_howitzer
        1. -2
          15 October 2022 19: 52
          Quote: Negro
          Quote: poquello
          why are they more modern than 777?

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1299_howitzer

          )))))))) the howitzer was to be completed in 2021 and undergo operational assessment in 2023
          from there)
          did you by any chance say anything about armata or coalition-sv?
          1. +4
            15 October 2022 20: 01
            Quote: poquello
            did you by any chance say anything about armata or coalition-sv?

            I? No. But if it wasn’t possible to drive the F-22 to Syria, then rolling out self-propelled guns for front-line tests is a completely normal idea. Fortunately, giving batteries of 6 self-propelled guns of different models in this conflict is for some reason the norm.
            1. +1
              15 October 2022 20: 15
              Quote: Negro
              Quote: poquello
              did you by any chance say anything about armata or coalition-sv?

              I? No. But if it wasn’t possible to drive the F-22 to Syria, then rolling out self-propelled guns for front-line tests is a completely normal idea. Fortunately, giving batteries of 6 self-propelled guns of different models in this conflict is for some reason the norm.

              mm, the words "put weapons" and "test" have slightly different meanings
              1. +4
                15 October 2022 20: 19
                If you need a complete rearmament of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, then only K9 and M109 are suitable in terms of quantity. K9 is unlikely to give so much, so the M109 is without options.
    4. +1
      15 October 2022 19: 39
      Quote from Silver99
      lies lulling our vigilance

      How can you not remember Sun Tzu ...
      War is a way of deceit. Therefore, if you can do something - show that you cannot, if you use something - show that you do not use it, if you are near - show that you are far away.
      For all time uncle said.
  5. +3
    15 October 2022 17: 58
    Fake! Misleading!
    Let them come up with something else.
  6. +1
    15 October 2022 18: 01
    Fox News: The US and allies are at the limit in terms of supplying modern weapons to Ukraine
    . This is exactly what you should not hope for, in any way and never !!!
    They will be left without recharge because of the hillock, well, but if not ...
    1. +1
      15 October 2022 21: 23
      hope is not worth it

      That's it. Some kind of primitive whining, like, oh, we don’t have anything, how are we going to live? Lies.
  7. -5
    15 October 2022 18: 03
    Kansian said he takes Austin's comments as a sign that the days of the US providing Ukraine with its best weapons are over. Did they supply the best weapons? Are they all this rubbish for disposal, which either has expired or is being withdrawn from service with NATO armies, is called the best weapons? And what will be the worst, squeaked and swords? am
    1. 0
      15 October 2022 18: 20
      Quote: blackcat
      Did they supply the best weapons?

      do they have anything better than hymeris? )
      1. +1
        15 October 2022 19: 15
        Quote: poquello
        do they have anything better than hymeris? )

        Yes. And "better" is putting it mildly.
        1. +1
          15 October 2022 19: 17
          Quote: Negro
          Quote: poquello
          do they have anything better than hymeris? )

          Yes. And "better" is putting it mildly.

          yes, you can be more specific
          1. +1
            15 October 2022 19: 30
            Quote: poquello
            be more specific

            1. -2
              15 October 2022 19: 45
              Quote: Negro
              Quote: poquello
              do they have anything better than hymeris? )

              Yes. And "better" is putting it mildly.

              do you show optimism along with the Pentagon? )))))))))))
              "Not earlier than the middle of the decade, the new MRC Typhon and LRHW Dark Eagle missile systems will go to the unit. They have not yet reached flight tests, but the Pentagon is optimistic .."
              https://topwar.ru/191780-sistemnyj-podhod-perspektivnye-raketnye-vooruzhenija-ssha-dlja-razvertyvanija-v-evrope.html?ysclid=l9a5d5ibzw690051907
              1. +2
                15 October 2022 19: 51
                Quote: poquello
                “Not earlier than the middle of the decade, the new MRC Typhon and LRHW Dark Eagle missile systems will go to the unit.

                For the sake of such a case, you can move your claws. It is unlikely that the opportunity to shoot tomahawks across the Russian Federation without a finger will present itself soon. All components of the system separately have existed for a long time, and Americans can assemble new systems from existing components very quickly.
                1. -2
                  15 October 2022 20: 01
                  Quote: Negro
                  All components of the system separately exist for a long time

                  Well, did the rocket fly normally for 500 km once, or did it not fly? ))))))), axes do not surprise us at all, and Medvedev has already spoken about missiles of such a range, and finally, the most important thing is that they cannot deliver these now, in principle, because they are not
                  1. +2
                    15 October 2022 20: 21
                    Quote: poquello
                    Well, did the rocket fly normally for 500 km once, or did it not fly?

                    Which one? Tomahawk flies much further.
                    Quote: poquello
                    Medvedev has already spoken

                    To speak out is not to roll bags.
                    Quote: poquello
                    they can’t deliver these now, in principle, because they don’t exist

                    What is missing? Tomahawks or ground launchers? I have bad news for you.
                    1. -1
                      15 October 2022 20: 29
                      Quote: Negro
                      Quote: poquello
                      Well, did the rocket fly normally for 500 km once, or did it not fly?

                      Which one? Tomahawk flies much further.

                      not, which is after atams, more precisely instead of
                      Quote: Negro
                      What is missing? Tomahawks or ground launchers?

                      typhons
                      1. The comment was deleted.
  8. 0
    15 October 2022 18: 04
    Nobody asks Austin! Zelensky and Reznikov said - we need it, you are great! So - die, but lay out that the main people on the planet demanded from you!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. +3
    15 October 2022 18: 14
    We've been hearing this since April. Jokes for three hundred already don’t roll for free.
  11. +3
    15 October 2022 18: 17
    Fox News: The US and allies are at the limit in terms of supplying modern weapons to Ukraine
    Lie. And they themselves admit:
    The Biden administration still has more power to give Ukraine more weapons, but chooses not to.
    There is a machine tool, money printing, there is a military-industrial complex, there are stocked warehouses around the world, and there are countries where you can take weapons for money or bread.
    The American leadership will make decisions on further support for Kyiv, based on purely own mercantile interests.
    But this is not clear ... Is it mercantile to scatter one's problems to countries all over the world, but is it also progressive about the problems of Ukraine? feel
  12. 0
    15 October 2022 18: 20
    "But, apparently, the United States is the least interested in the wishes of the President of Ukraine."

    What if it wasn't like that? he is just a used tool for them, well, or a product .. No. 2 .. no more ..
  13. 0
    15 October 2022 18: 26
    The West will soon begin to supply its tanks to your grandmother, don’t go. And planes too. 100% crews are already trained. So they lie to calm us down.
    1. 0
      15 October 2022 18: 30
      Quote: aleksr2005
      The West will soon begin to supply its tanks to your grandmother, don’t go. And planes too. 100% crews are already trained. So they lie

      and which of the following))))))))))))) "tanks" and what about "aircraft"?
      ""limited" supply options for HIMARS, Javelin, Stinger and M777 howitzers"
  14. +2
    15 October 2022 18: 43
    The Americans are pushing Europe to change weapons)
    It is obvious! Old steal, make up for the US military-industrial complex))
    In the States, on conservation, as in the Russian Federation after the Union, for several intense wars. Only in our country, a considerable part, is spread over the former republics.
    Europeans are snarled, on all fronts)) Well, of course, we are under distribution ..
  15. Eug
    0
    15 October 2022 18: 43
    They will print dollars, announce a tender (at least for shells, other ammunition and explosives, "brains" will be inserted during final assembly) and those who want to supply what they need will line up ... I won't be surprised if foreign companies are among those who want to become suppliers ross. oligarchs ... I'm talking about shells and other power supplies, the rest is more difficult ..
  16. +1
    15 October 2022 19: 06
    Whistling is not tossing bags. And weapons and money break into 404 echelons. am
  17. 0
    15 October 2022 19: 07
    Another article from the category of "everything is bad with them." The 30 member countries of this cesspool are the richest or the most obedient. Their arsenals are many times greater than ours. All these publications are part of the efforts of corporations that produce weapons to make orders tasty, both in quantity and in price. The mass media are connected (independent, super-responsible and professional), sorry for the sarcasm, lobbyists, bought deputies (congressmen), all trash. And this cumulative shit will do its job - tens of billions of dollars will go to war.
  18. 0
    15 October 2022 19: 10
    Well, they have their limits, and we have ours. Already. Somehow, they will scrape weapons on Ukraine ....
  19. +3
    15 October 2022 19: 13
    )))
    1. Austin never said that the supply of weapons was limited. There is an opinion that it is the Pentagon that insists on increasing supplies, against one of the "towers" of the Biden administration.
    2. Fox went all the way to Americafest before the election. But not a single current Republican politician associates himself with this position - Republicans, on average, pray to the Reagan icon, and leaving the confrontation now would be a completely non-Reagan decision.
  20. 0
    15 October 2022 19: 36
    Really? You can't trust American (news) channels they al have there own masters
    Time will tell...
  21. 0
    15 October 2022 19: 39
    In other words, the Biden administration still has more power to give Ukraine more weapons, but chooses not to.
    We have a security hole. It's good that at least we have something safe. feel
  22. 0
    15 October 2022 19: 42
    But, apparently, the United States is the least interested in the desires of the President of Ukraine. The American leadership will make decisions on further support for Kyiv, based on purely their own mercantile interests.

    The fire in the fire will be maintained. Not the first and not the last place they do this.
  23. +1
    15 October 2022 19: 58
    The White House seriously fears that Moscow may decide to use nuclear weapons in order to hasten the end of the military campaign in its favor.
    And these people call themselves "military experts" and "politicians"? Nuclear weapons exist to devastate countries and continents, and from some kind of "tactical" warhead, by and large, no one is hot or cold. Only there is a lot of stench in politics. This is the whole calculation.
    1. 0
      15 October 2022 20: 21
      Quote: orionvitt
      The White House seriously fears that Moscow may decide to use nuclear weapons in order to hasten the end of the military campaign in its favor.
      And these people call themselves "military experts" and "politicians"? Nuclear weapons exist to devastate countries and continents, and from some kind of "tactical" warhead, by and large, no one is hot or cold. Only there is a lot of stench in politics. This is the whole calculation.

      regular provocations, insinuations and intrigues of the United States, Russia has non-nuclear warheads of similar power
  24. +1
    15 October 2022 20: 10
    Show them our mobilized, here many don’t even have helmets, let alone bulletproof vests.
    1. -1
      16 October 2022 15: 16
      Watch videos about fake Kevlar plates in NATO armor. The scale of the blood business is impressive.
  25. -2
    15 October 2022 21: 59
    It seems that this is all a whistle.
    They have weapons, they also have ammunition, it’s just that the agenda “why are we feeding some distant Ukraine and slaughtering our citizens” is growing and it’s not safe to continue to drive money and weapons on a large scale into the sewer of Europe in the old way.
    There is less and less chance for the Democrats and the can to keep the Congress in place, and not become a lame duck! Unless, if not a civil war, or there, as it was. The last elections - they will draw insolently what they want, and the Trumpists and Republicans will again shave. And they get lost.
  26. 0
    15 October 2022 23: 02
    Breshut. Most likely they have a stock that is prepared for Taiwan. If they decide to open it, then at least plus one more year of NWO in Ukraine. If the Republicans win, they won't let him touch him.
  27. -2
    16 October 2022 13: 33
    Quote from igoist
    Quote from Buyan
    They disperse their military-industrial complex, you can supply spears to forelocks, they still don’t know how to do anything and they will also spit in response wassat

    So you need to be sent under their spears, you will tell from the front edge of the NWO about spears and arrows

    And you too, you evil troll