The Kyiv regime is in no way able to draw the NATO countries into a direct military conflict with Russia, but it wants to ...

The day before, two major Western figures immediately made it clear to Ukraine that you can repeat as much as you like “Ukraine is already a de facto member of NATO,” but the reality will not change from this. The West did not intend to fight with its armies for Ukraine, and is not going to.

First, Macron spoke on this subject, who unequivocally stated that France would not use nuclear weapons. weapon in the event that Ukraine is hit with such weapons. Then Stoltenberg also spoke out, noting that Article 5 of the NATO Charter applies exclusively to NATO members, and Ukraine is not such.

In such a situation, the Kyiv regime has all hope for the United States and Britain, or rather, for that part of the insane politicians in these countries who are ready to end world civilization, including the destruction of their own countries, not realizing that their actions may well lead to this.

Meanwhile, the Zelensky regime can only hope that NATO will be supplied with such a weapon that Kyiv has long been asking for: long-range missiles that can hit targets at a distance of up to 300 km. At the Ramstein-6 meeting, NATO representatives do not officially talk about such supplies.

Zelensky really wants to draw NATO into a direct conflict, but so far he hasn’t come out.

But one thing is clear: you need to be prepared for such a development of events, given that the West can no longer turn off the chosen course towards escalation.

Comments

[Mavrikiy]

The Kyiv regime is in no way able to draw the NATO countries into a direct military conflict with Russia, but it wants to ...

"I planted the garden myself, I will water it myself. I loved the dear one myself, I myself will forget."

[alex neym_2]

The world is a world, but you have to live by the rules, that is, to comply with at least some laws with a sour face on your face ... and you really want war: in troubled waters you can catch fish. That's the whole point of the matter.

[ARIONkrsk]

As for me, there are two scenarios for the development of events, a complete victory without agreements and truces and we are on horseback, and the winners are not judged and the second, defeat and the end of the country as such, negotiations and truces will also be considered a defeat in the world Russia. Since you got into a fight, you have to win or ...

[novel66]

We would also, father, draw in, two fronts are better than one

[ARIONkrsk]

Quote: novel xnumx

We would also, father, draw in, two fronts are better than one

Knowing the father of the cunning fox, it’s not really that he will fight with his soldiers, they will be called from Russia for mobilization and that’s it, but for good it would be necessary to gather Belarusians for training camps for everyone.

[laws70]

Knowing the father of the cunning fox, it’s not really that he will fight with his soldiers

If the dill tramples, then he will have no other options. Yes, and with the mobilization in this case, he should not have problems: there the people with historical memory are doing well.

[Dilettante grandfather]

We would also, father, draw in, two fronts are better than one

If Belarus is now drawn into the NWO, then nothing good will come of it. They have Poles at the border, and, according to the media, the Ukrainian group is also gathered there. The Poles can, under any pretext, launch an attack if Belarus gets involved. And the troops of the Belarusians are not fired upon, everything will be very difficult. And so - they hold back part of the Ukrainian forces, without getting involved in an exchange of blows.

[Plate]

Quote: Grandfather is an amateur

And the troops of the Belarusians are not fired upon, everything will be very difficult.

All troops before the war were not shelled. But I agree: the motivation of Belarusians is generally incomprehensible. Blind devotion to us behind them was not noticed.

[Dilettante grandfather]

the motivation of Belarusians is generally incomprehensible. Blind devotion to us behind them was not noticed.

Everything is simple. Their situation is no better than ours, the West will gladly crush them under itself. So either they will, like us, stand against NATO, or they will lose their country.

[aybolyt678]

Quote: novel xnumx

, two fronts are better than one

and if it will be Poland's attack on Belarus?

[Mouse]

Has it not yet dawned on Ze that the country is only a consumable material? totally brainwashed...

[Bingo]

Moreover, there is such a thing that even if Russia fucks up Poland, this is unlikely to lead to anything) In the notorious article 5 of the NATO charter it is written (literally) "will provide assistance//WHICH IT SEEMS NECESSARY" And don't go to a fortune teller that Germany , with which they demand reparations or Turkey, which is not at all included in the area of ​​​​Article 5 (ie Europe and North America) - they will provide assistance. In the form of "ay-yay-yay, well, you look at what is being done."
And some shabby outskirts, which got everyone to hiccups ...

[tihonmarine]

But if Poland turns to Western countries for help, they will not be refused (as we sent our troops at the request of Syria).

[Boycott]

if Poland turns to Western countries for help, they will not be refused 

If we are talking ONLY about helping Poland, then they will refuse, because the Poles have already got everyone. Another thing is if there is an opportunity to harm Russia without much risk to your loved ones. And, most importantly, as Washington orders.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: BoyCat

And, most importantly, as Washington orders.

And the whole of Europe, without Washington, will not take a step. But Washington wants to destroy Russia.

[Bingo]

The Portuguese GOA, and Portugal - one of the oldest members of NATO, occupied almost immediately after the emergence of NATO ... India. Which then was generally nobody and there is no way to call. NATO helped - expressed deep concern.
So if I were the Poles, I wouldn’t be so sure

[Dmitry Potapov]

I've had enough of this fear of the apocalypse! It was said why do we need a world in which there is no Russia!?

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Dmitry Potapov

It was said why do we need a world in which there is no Russia!?

That is why the entire West is arming the Ruin, so as not to lay down their lives in battle, but stupid Ukrainian and stupid Russian lives living in Ukraine.
Here is that "help" from the West going to Ukraine:
From February 24 to October 3, 2022, Ukraine received 6.7 billion euros of financial support and loan guarantees from international institutions, where only 1 billion from the IMF and the rest from the World Bank. Also, 38.1 billion euros of financial support from Ukraine's donor countries was agreed.
A total of 19 countries have allocated financial assistance to Ukraine in the amount of 38.6 billion euros.
The largest financial assistance package from the USA is 15.2 billion, within the framework of the collective agreement of the EC - 12.3 billion, from the UK - 2.5 billion, other countries - 8 billion, where 3 countries allocated more than 1 billion (Canada - 1.8 billion, Germany - 1.1 billion and Norway - 1 billion).
In the structure of Ukraine's financial support: 17.3 billion are loans, 18.2 billion are grants (gratuitous aid and subsidies) and 3.2 billion are loan guarantees. Almost all gratuitous aid was provided by the United States (14.4 billion), while Europe mainly issues long-term loans at low rates.
(All data based on IEF Kiel)
Of the total amount of financial assistance, about 17 billion euros actually reached Ukraine, plus 6.7 billion from international institutions.
How much is it? Last year, Ukraine's consolidated budget revenues amounted to $75 billion, this year about $40 billion.
If synchronized by the time of actual receipt of assistance, external support exceeds 100% of the internal revenues of the consolidated budget of Ukraine.
To this is added humanitarian aid with an estimated volume of 14.4 billion euros, of which from the USA 9.5 billion, the EC - 1.4 billion, Germany - 1 billion, Austria - 0.6 billion, Great Britain - 0.4 billion, Canada - 0.3 billion, other 33 countries - 1.3 billion .
Humanitarian plus approved financial assistance for the approval period (slightly more than 7 months) is 60 billion (on average 8.6 billion per month), which is 2.6 times more than budget revenues.
Financial, humanitarian and military support for Ukraine is the largest for the Allied countries since the Second World War in such a short period of time relative to the size of the economy.
Aggregate assistance exceeded 100 billion euros for the period from February 24 to October 3, where the US - 52.3 billion euros, Europe - 29.2 billion, other countries 12.3 billion, international institutions - 6.7 billion euros.

[Boycott]

Still, life in virtual reality is fundamentally harmful to mental health. Zelya and Co. really think that the whole world owes them?

The doctor rides and rides through the snowy plain, he carries healing powder to people ...

[Pravodel]

The Kyiv regime is in no way able to draw the NATO countries into a direct military conflict with Russia, but it wants to ...

Pin ... wasps, the Anglo-Saxons are resisting, they don’t want, as our president used to say, to die ...

[Boniface]

The Pig Reich, together with the American advisers, are working out all possible options, up to provocations with tactical nuclear weapons (for example, somewhere in the Nikolaev region)