Peskov commented on Kadyrov's words about nuclear weapons

The head of the Kremlin press service Dmitry Peskov commented on the words of the head of the Chechen Republic Ramzan Kadyrov about nuclear weapons. The representative of the presidential administration recalled that the grounds for its application are clearly spelled out in the defense doctrine.

He spoke about this in an interview with reporters.

Peskov noted that even in the most difficult situation, it is necessary to refrain from showing emotions when assessing the actions of the leadership of the country's Armed Forces.

This is how the head of the Kremlin press service reacted to Kadyrov's criticism of the General Staff and his statement that Russia should use "low-yield" nuclear weapons in Ukraine. Among other things, the Chechen leader said that he did not know the content of the reports of the leadership of the Ministry of Defense to the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, that is, President Vladimir Putin, but the course of the special operation demonstrates the need for more drastic measures, up to the use of "low-yield" nuclear weapons.

Peskov said that the heads of Russian regions have the right to publicly express their point of view, but it is advisable not to do it so emotionally.

The nuclear doctrine of our state says that the use of nuclear weapons is possible only when the enemy uses weapons of mass destruction against the Russian Federation or there is confirmed information about the launch of ballistic missiles aimed at Russian strategic objects. It is also permissible to use it if conventional weapons are used against our country, but there is a threat to the existence of the state.

Comments

[ZoV]

the need to apply more drastic measures, up to the use of "low-yield" nuclear weapons.

Yes, there is something like FAB-500, etc. In terms of power, it’s almost like a tactical nuclear weapon, but clean, it burns everything out and it’s practically impossible to hide from its damaging effect. Well, Kadyrov, of course, declared on emotions, although many people think so .. so it’s all just tired! It's time to finish.!

[Plate]

FAB-500 is far from nuclear bombs. If you want to catch up with big explosions, there is AVBPM.

[SKVichyakow]

Quote: Plate

FAB-500 is far from nuclear bombs. If you want to catch up with big explosions, there is AVBPM.

Not just far, but close is not comparable. TNW in 2.5 kt, this is 2500 tons of TNT. And FAB-500 is only 500 kg of TNT.

[Munhausen]

Surge of horror is one of the important factors in the war. Sense from the fact that we have AVBPM? Lying in warehouses, collecting dust. It's like grandmothers' crystal sets in their wardrobes. They lie for decades until a specific case.
If the Americans were faced with a problem like ours at the ZNPP, everything around would have survived long ago. It is possible that tactical nuclear weapons were changed. Yes, even with their characteristic PR campaigns.

[Thrifty]

"Peskov brings a blizzard -V Putin

[Nuka]

Quote from ZOV

the need to apply more drastic measures, up to the use of "low-yield" nuclear weapons.

Yes, there is something like FAB-500, etc. In terms of power, it’s almost like a tactical nuclear weapon, but clean, it burns everything out and it’s practically impossible to hide from its damaging effect. Well, Kadyrov, of course, declared on emotions, although many people think so .. so it’s all just tired! It's time to finish.!

When describing the action, you are not talking about FAB, but you seem to think about ODAB ...
And the rest - I agree, it's time.

[ZoV]

Quote: Nuka

When describing the action, you are not talking about FAB, but you seem to think about ODAB ...
And the rest - I agree, it's time.

It’s time, stop trying already with this and that .. The war is dragging on, and this is not beneficial for Russia.

[Nuka]

Quote from ZOV

It’s time, stop trying already with this and that .. The war is dragging on, and this is not beneficial for Russia.

Not only is it unprofitable, but simply deadly.

[ZoV]

Quote: Nuka

Quote from ZOV

It’s time, stop trying already with this and that .. The war is dragging on, and this is not beneficial for Russia.

Not only is it unprofitable, but simply deadly.

Dangerous, you rightly pointed out.. That's why the mobilization was announced! The Gauleiter of Ukraine is already conducting mobilization in a row, he caught up with "cannon fodder", and even Western mercenaries .. And Russia is trying to keep defense with contract soldiers
Now let's see what and how

[Starover_Z]

Quote from ZOV

.Well, Kadyrov, of course, declared on emotions, although many people think so .. so it's all just tired! It's time to finish.!

Still would ! For six months of a special military operation (SVO), 6000 people have already been officially recognized as killed! And basically, they were quite young, full of strength men! Is this not enough?! And how many civilians suffered and drastically in the areas bordering Ukraine?! And the enemy's decision-making centers are intact and fulfill their tasks! How long will this continue?

[ZoV]

Quote: Starover_Z

For six months of a special military operation (SVO), 6000 people have already been officially recognized as killed! And basically, they were quite young, full of strength men.

The land rest in peace to the soldiers .. Yes, the losses were especially in the first months.
Now the men have gone adults and not to earn money, but to fight, knowing perfectly well what they are getting into ...
200 thousand are already being prepared at the training grounds, 200 thousand have fled to Kazakhstan, etc. So everything is still ahead. The commander was changed in Syria, he commanded the group. Let's see what happens, Russia has no way back.

[bath]

Both in terms of the method of throwing, and in terms of energy density. No one would think of a tactical nuclear weapon, which is a free-falling bomb.

Your mind is still stuck on the B29 bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

[Nickelium]

Maybe FAB-9000? Five hundred is like scratching behind the ear.

[Buyan]

Hmm ... Trying to shut your mouth and say only what you need - we have no censorship RA continue to burn the truth of the uterus

[Zakirov Damir]

Quote from Buyan

Hmm ... Trying to shut your mouth and say only what you need - we have no censorship RA continue to burn the truth of the uterus

Well, you see - you start to improve! Punctuation marks are already appearing, and where literacy does not allow, you insert faces. Soon they will take it completely for "ours"!

[Turtle]

Russification is completed after a person begins to meaningfully swear. You can't check it here.

[Plate]

It turns out that I'm trying to eradicate "Russification" from myself?

[Turtle]

Russian just can not be etched ... I don't consider swearing to be something unequivocally bad: one of the facets of the national mentality, according to the generally accepted version, borrowed from the Tatars. But, the key word is "MEANINGLY".

[Zoldat_A]

Quote from Buyan

Hmm ... Trying to shut your mouth and say only what you need - we have no censorship

Peskov said that the heads of Russian regions have the right to publicly express their point of view, but it is advisable not to do it so emotionally.

Again "partners" and not "enemy"? Again, forty kilometers from Moscow, they will sniff, that it would be time to defend the Motherland?

I don’t know what kind of “cunning plan” there is in the Kremlin to “level the front line” - they didn’t report to me, but sick of...

And in the Donbass they continue to beat, they continue - nothing has changed. Whether it is Russia or not, the Armed Forces of Ukraine and America do not care.
And the Belgorod region flew in today - the woman died.
Are we not at war? We have a "special operation"? Ah, well, yes ... Since there is no war, there is no need to fight ...

It's a shame ... Why do the boys "do not pour water"?

GS - wash your hands of the blood of our boys and stop betrayal! Or "to Tashkent, to evacuation" ...
There will be someone to fight instead of you. Look, the men have been fighting in the Donbass for eight years - they know what to do.

[Normal]

So the need makes us already say so, even the heads of regions. You don’t hear the people, so people of the level of Kadyrov, Prigozhin, Gurulev have to talk about it. And why doesn't Mr. Peskov tell us why the dismissed military commissar Yuri Laiko is being transferred to a similar position in the Magadan Region? This is how to understand, that is, a peasant copes with his position, just the climate did not fit? Is it not possible to leave the Magadan region, but change the position, for example, to a balancer?

[saved]

There are bombers with large non-nuclear weapons, there are targets for them, there is only no political desire.

[Buyan]

Quote: Zakirov Damir

Quote from Buyan

Hmm ... Trying to shut your mouth and say only what you need - we have no censorship RA continue to burn the truth of the uterus

Well, you see - you start to improve! Punctuation marks are already appearing, and where literacy does not allow, you insert faces. Soon they will take it completely for "ours"!

yes, I'm not theirs why did you decide to write me down as a spy?)

[Codett]

Yes, Peskov would have been better off keeping quiet, all his children live over the hill, such as he should not hold high positions, since they are not trustworthy

[Alf]

Quote: Codett

Yes, Peskov would have been better off keeping quiet, all his children live over the hill, such as he should not hold high positions, since they are not trustworthy

It's easier to say who is trustworthy in the Kremlin...

[jovanni]

Ramzan has the right to say what he said. His family and friends are fighting bravely for Russia. Does this courtier have the right to tell him? Which of his relatives is at the front?

[for]

but the course of the special operation demonstrates the need for more drastic measures, up to the use of "low-yield" nuclear weapons.

It should have been applied a long time ago, even in the Chechen war.
There is such a thing as a nuclear explosion, power in TNT equivalent, so it might be better to have a TNT explosion in nuclear equivalent (something like that).
It hurts to press the button.

[evgen1221]

In principle, I agree with the mustache. You have to control emotions. Yes, and the use of nuclear weapons of any, well, not Kadyrov's competence at all.

[The Siberian barber]

So the emphasis about nuclear weapons placed by Peskov is intended to divert attention from the key problem identified by Kadyrov in his criticism.
And this problem is the top of the Moscow Region, with its "traditions and competence"
This sly Peskov))

[Alf]

Quote: The Siberian Barber

This cunning Peskov

Others are not kept in this position.

[Munhausen]

Quote: evgen1221

In principle, I agree with the mustache. You have to control emotions.

He was quite restrained and measured in his statements. Why does no one here remember the fiery speeches of the transatlantic hawks? Up to their president. What they don’t talk about there, what punishments they don’t express to our souls. Russians and Russians are constantly poured with slops. The statements of their generals and high-ranking politicians about the need to deal with Russia with the help of nuclear bombing were repeatedly quoted. But everyone is silent, they take it for granted. All such exemplary terpily. But as soon as the compatriot boldly spoke out, hissing and grumbling began immediately, that this is not possible with big uncles. What is everyone afraid of? They were not afraid of a nuclear catastrophe during the shelling of the ZNPP. Apparently it should be. This arrangement suited everyone.
It's no secret that the shelling of the Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant was carried out with the permission and support of the States. And they perfectly understood the consequences of the catastrophe. If this arrangement suited everyone and you also, what is the problem in demonstrating it in a reduced version? They wanted nuclear broads, get it.

[Normann]

And when servicemen are destroyed in batches, we must express concern ...

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Normann

we must express concern

With all due respect to Sergei Viktorovich.

Let's express concern - let them be afraid ...

[Andrey Moskvin]

At what level of losses (territorial or human), does a threat to the existence of the state arise? Is it in the doctrine?

[Alemax]

At what level of losses (territorial or human), does a threat to the existence of the state arise?

This level has already been passed.

[Krivotykin]

Kadyrov is going to send his sons into battle. And Peskov, it seems, also has a son, let him first send his Russian lands to collect, and then criticize Ramzan.

[yuriy55]

The nuclear doctrine of our state says that the use of nuclear weapons is possible only when the enemy uses weapons of mass destruction against the Russian Federation or there is confirmed information about the launch of ballistic missiles aimed at Russian strategic objects.

Enough of this nuclear doctrine wag. Not only do they begin to give it their own interpretation, they also do not read it:

27. The Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction against it and (or) its allies, as well as in the case of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened.
The decision on the use of nuclear weapons is made by the President of the Russian Federation.

https://legalacts.ru/doc/voennaja-doktrina-rossiiskoi-federatsii-utv-prezidentom-rf/
It seems that the GDP itself waved it without reading it, like the law on pension reform ...
*****
It clearly says:
aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened.
We look:

The state is a political form of the structure of society in a certain area, a sovereign form of public power, which has an apparatus of control and coercion, to which the entire population of the country is subject.

The first and main reason for the use of nuclear weapons is a military invasion by ANYONE with the aim of seizing the territory of the Russian Federation, the boundaries of which are defined by law. What difference does it make to us what Trass says there ... Yes, fuck us to put on the old American senile ... Who is itching to try the power of the Strategic Missile Forces of the Russian Federation?
Massacres of Russian citizens, destruction of objects of vital activity of the peoples of Russia, encroachments on the territorial integrity of Russia - A THREAT TO THE EXISTENCE OF THE STATE.
Kadyrov is right.

[AndreyKa54076]

A lot, lately, in the information field of this sand, heads with mustaches speaking in routine phrases ... I'm tired and infuriating already!

[Alemax]

The nuclear doctrine of our state says that the use of nuclear weapons is possible only when the enemy uses weapons of mass destruction against the Russian Federation or there is confirmed information about the launch of ballistic missiles aimed at Russian strategic objects. It is also permissible to use it if conventional weapons are used against our country, but there is a threat to the existence of the state.

Let's quote already normally.

Decree No. 355 "On the fundamentals of the policy of the Russian Federation in the field of nuclear deterrence." June 2, 2020

Section III. Conditions for the transition of the Russian Federation to the use of nuclear weapons.
...
19. The conditions determining the possibility of the use of nuclear weapons by the Russian Federation are:
a) the receipt of reliable information about the launch of ballistic missiles attacking the territory of the Russian Federation and (or) its allies;
b) the use by the adversary of nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction across the territories of the Russian Federation and (or) its allies;
c) the enemy’s impact on critical state or military facilities of the Russian Federation, the failure of which will lead to the disruption of the response of nuclear forces;
d) aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is jeopardized.
It's all about the strategic nuclear arsenal.
But about tactical nuclear weapons, which a priori have nothing to do with strategic ones, according to the very definition - low-power special ammunition designed for use at the tactical level - literally on the battlefield or in the near rear of the enemy.
As the name implies, tactical nuclear weapons (TNW) include special ammunition designed for use at the operational-tactical level. In addition, the delivery vehicles and carriers of such weapons are tactical systems and complexes operated in different branches of the military. (quote from a weekly article from the Military Review)
Even if you ignore points c) and d) of the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation, even though they are directly requested, the use of tactical nuclear weapons in this current situation is fully justified. Ramzan Akhmatych is right.

[Mint Gingerbread]

Quote: AndreyKa54076

A lot, lately, in the information field of this sand, heads with mustaches speaking in routine phrases ... I'm tired and infuriating already!

The United States had Psaki, in Russia there was a domestic analogue - Peskov He has a good job. You sit in front of the cameras, move your mustache and talk, I don’t know anything, but I’ll definitely find out and tell you
And Ramzan Kadyrov is the Caucasian Zhirinovsky.

[Kuzmitsky]

Not really. Ramzan Akhmatovich not only talks, he does a lot. Moreover, at the federal level, and not at the level of a simple head of the region.

[Mint Gingerbread]

By itself. I meant, just some similarity in emotional expression to the situation.

[WapentakeLokki]

we will apply tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine - the West will impose sanctions .. if we don’t apply the nuclear weapons tact, it will impose sanctions anyway. not the supply of old weapons left over from the Warsaw Pacts) there are already artillery instructors (and air defense is completely based on NATO AWACS and satellites) ... so what is happening looks like a Fierce CONTRACT .. where our General Staff agreed with the West playing giveaways .. that's just the simple guys in the trenches already guess and quite in the subject of all that whoredom .. well, how does the misunderstanding between the rank and file and the gentlemen from the headquarters can remind you of February-October 1917 ..

[Genry]

Peskov was right about Kadyrov. He likes to report about the capture of cities, while they are released only after a few days.
And he hurried to scribble his telegram sensation about Lapin first of all, inflating the showdown and emotions.
About the use of nuclear weapons - this is generally ....

[Carlos Hall]

There are many like Peskov, but few like Kadyrov. Kadyrov suspects and is right that President Putin is being deceived. That the fifth column bought part of the High Command.

[Vadim Sharygin]

Apparently, no three hundred thousand mobilized will be enough for us, taking into account the second front in Moldova, the increase in NATO supplies and the tactics of "battalion tactical groups", instead of regiments-divisions-armies. So the issue of tactical nuclear weapons is a matter of the next five months. Then there will be a mutually declared sudden war with NATO, betrayal of China and the forced use of strategic nuclear weapons by us, then ... the beginning of time, and then, after many, many years of peace, again evolution from a monkey to Peskov, Biden and Galkin with Pugacheva.

[Mikhalych]

Ramzan was wrong. Not in Ukraine it is necessary to use a vigorous loaf, but in Poles and Britons. And Peskov looks like Yasterzhembsky, they have such a mantle.