The latest provocation against Russia

147
The latest provocation against Russia


The world will never be the same


So, the world after September 26, 2022 will never be the same.

The world gendarme played the queen of state terrorism by committing sabotage in the Baltic on the Potoks. Sabotage against Russia and the European Union. The red line of interstate "rules" has not just been crossed, it has been blown up and disappeared into the muddy deposits of the Baltic bottom. Gas pipelines have been killed forever, the United States will not allow them to be restored.



The European Union has been dealt a mortal blow, Russia a sensitive one. That is, one target is hit, the other is only damaged.

Are we talking about the near future?

Only the deaf and blind did not notice that since the beginning of September, from the “great offensive” in the Kharkiv region, which ended with a regrouping to the Russian border, a sharp outburst of emotions from the United States, Ukraine and the West as a whole on the topic of the likely imminent use of nuclear weapons by Russia weapons. Against the "square", of course.

An example scenario might look like this.

The best place for provocation seems to be the area around the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. The territory was previously contaminated with radiation during the accident in 1986, it is closely adjacent to the border of Belarus, quite far from Kyiv and large cities of Ukraine, the nuclear power plant itself can be presented as an object of attack. The attack, of course, will be repulsed by anti-aircraft gunners, the station is saved, but a nuclear explosion cannot be avoided. For the level of directing "George Lucas" it's not bad to intercept the supposedly Russian "Tochka-U" in the station area (passing it off as Iskander, but this is already optional), launched independently from somewhere along the border with the Bryansk region.

The explosion is ground, you can use a standard American B61 charge, for example, the 12th series with a variable charge, optimally 10 kilotons, secretly delivered from occupied Germany. At a distance of 12-15 km for nuclear power plants, the danger is almost zero. Activation is remote, at the same time it is convenient to annihilate the delivery participants, leaving them to protect the “product”.

It is advisable to link the time of the action with the weather, that is, the south, and preferably the southeast wind in the area of ​​the event, in order to minimize radioactive contamination of the territory of Ukraine and maximize the same in Belarus. But it must not be delayed, the “Russian nuclear strike” should be the answer of a desperate aggressor to the Kharkov offensive of the “warriors of light”, since another similar reason may not happen. At least we all hope so.

Within an hour and a half news about the “use of nuclear weapons by Russia” should circle the globe several times, accelerated by the media: from giants to family chats in the most terrible details. A nuclear strike will be condemned by all international organizations without exception, from the UN General Assembly to the International Union of Beekeepers.

Russia will be expelled and excluded from everywhere, recognized as a terrorist country, trade is prohibited and subject to jurisdiction, all assets are arrested, including diplomatic ones. Multinational foreign troops will enter Ukraine under the auspices of the UN, first to eliminate the consequences of a nuclear attack, then as peacekeeping forces. Our evidence of non-involvement will not be taken into account due to the "obviousness" of the situation.

No "hiley likes". The Russians launched a nuclear strike on a country with which they are de facto fighting not for life, but for death. They tried to attack the nuclear power plant with nuclear weapons in order to destroy the enemy's capital. Which of the "partners" and even "friends" will doubt? And if he doubts, he will not remain silent?

This is no longer a move by the queen, but a blow with a chessboard to the head.

And then our world will truly never be the same...

PS


The author cannot offer a plan of salvation, but he would be grateful to anyone who would offer one or dispel the expressed fears.
147 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -10
    3 October 2022 16: 02
    Russia will be expelled and excluded from everywhere, recognized as a terrorist country, trade is prohibited and subject to jurisdiction, all assets are arrested, including diplomatic ones.


    So far, the United States has not been expelled from anywhere for the bombing of Japanese cities! How strange!

    Vladimir Vladimirovich said well that the United States created a precedent by bombing Japan))) (opened Pandora's box) - now let them be afraid of us!
    1. +2
      3 October 2022 16: 25
      Quote: Boniface
      So far, the United States has not been expelled from anywhere for the bombing of Japanese cities! How strange!

      Quote: Boniface
      So far, the United States has not been expelled from anywhere for the bombing of Japanese cities! How strange!

      There is nothing strange, all NATO countries are US vassals, they will never raise their hands and open their mouths to the "master's hand."
      Everything is like in your country or in my country house - a yard terrier and his owner.
      The script was written by the author, quite real, and x "master of the chessboard" is preparing for it.
      1. +3
        3 October 2022 17: 04
        what to say .. firstly, you don’t need to rock the boat (yacht), secondly, there is no time for rocking ... and thirdly, please treat with understanding ...
        1. 0
          3 October 2022 17: 15
          So after that you can safely use tactical nuclear weapons. To hit the border through tunnels, for example, to take out the entire constellation of satellites in orbit, after such provocations it will become a necessity. And let them announce what they want, if insanity began to rule there.
          1. -15
            3 October 2022 19: 00
            I wrote again.
            For a nuclear strike on Ukraine, three Boreas are needed, which should covertly go out and freeze in low noise mode in the ocean.
            Then one of the Boreys is supposed to discharge maces with 100 kt warheads on bridges, tunnels, turbine rooms of power plants and other critical infrastructure of Ukraine. It is advisable to do this from the near Atlantic for the United States.
            The explosion of charges of 100 kt can be carried out at a considerable height, while the shock wave will bring down the bridge or the roof of the turbine hall, and the radioactive contamination of the area will be minimal. All US attempts to respond will be blocked by the uncertainty of the positions of two more Boreas.
            Using the surprise of the strike, our airborne troops, with the support of the Air Force, skillfully using tactical weapons against the surviving fragments of air defense and local defense centers, must take key positions for the advancement of our ground forces, which, having deployed, will make a final cleansing of enemy troops.
            This will save tens of thousands of Russians and millions of Russians, too, but mistakenly considered Ukrainian, lives compared to a long positional war of extermination.
            1. +1
              4 October 2022 13: 35
              For a nuclear strike on Ukraine

              In general, the Russian Federation plans to overthrow the Kyiv regime and take the throne or power, and, accordingly, the inhabitants there will become Russians. How are you going to look into the eyes of these Russians if they were hit with a nuclear weapon?
          2. 0
            4 October 2022 14: 22
            tactical nuclear weapons

            Man, how can you write about tactical nuclear weapons so easily?
            Do you even give a report on what nuclear weapons are? Or is it the provocateurs ran.
            Let me remind you that the war with nuclear weapons is the destruction of civilization.
      2. -1
        3 October 2022 17: 17
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Quote: Boniface
        So far, the United States has not been expelled from anywhere for the bombing of Japanese cities! How strange!

        Quote: Boniface
        So far, the United States has not been expelled from anywhere for the bombing of Japanese cities! How strange!

        There is nothing strange, all NATO countries are US vassals, they will never raise their hands and open their mouths to the "master's hand."
        Everything is like in your country or in my country house - a yard terrier and his owner.
        The script was written by the author, quite real, and x "master of the chessboard" is preparing for it.

        A retaliatory series of tactical nuclear strikes on military bases in Romania, Poland and the Baltic states will follow. Quite an equal exchange for both parties!

        What will NATO's response be? I am interested in the specific decision of the USA, England, France and Germany, and not "mosquito barking"!
        1. +8
          3 October 2022 21: 06
          Quote: Damir Zakirov
          A retaliatory series of tactical nuclear strikes on military bases in Romania, Poland and the Baltic states will follow. Quite an equal exchange for both parties!

          This is exactly what the States are trying to achieve: a nuclear bombing in Europe! And they are behind a large puddle, in the "house". That's the whole point.
          What will NATO's response be?

          Yes, in general, it’s purple for me, what the mongrels will do. The main thing is to castrate Uncle Sam in time! am
          I suggest.
          At the level of the President or Foreign Minister, declare that the very first nuclear explosion on the territory of Ukraine, Belarus or ours will entail a MASSIVE nuclear strike on the territory of the USA, Great Britain and France - NATO nuclear states.
          And after that, let them think - is it worth it or not to throw stones at others, living in a glass house.
          IMHO.
          1. -2
            3 October 2022 21: 24
            They don't believe Alexander.
            Do not get reliable glory until the blood has been shed.
            That's why - three "Boreas".
            1. -4
              3 October 2022 23: 18
              Quote: Victor Leningradets
              That's why - three "Boreas".

              One "Belgorod" is enough to wash England into the sea - as a warning. As a second warning - the undermining of bottom sea mines and the washout of both coasts of the United States for 300 - 500 km. deep into . As a third warning, the launch of all Voevods remaining in service (there are about 36 of them, 10 YaBBs each) in the continental United States. As a warning to France, a volley of one Dolphin (the oldest, which is closer to decommissioning) is enough to eliminate strategic nuclear forces and naval infrastructure, 16 Sineva SLBMs will be quite enough.
              If the first warnings are not convincing enough, then a certain number of old Topols and KR with air-based nuclear warheads will convince the remaining unconvinced.
              And no overexpenditure of strategic nuclear forces.
              And no nuclear strikes on their own territory (and the lands of the former "Ukraine" are Russian Lands), no consumption of the latest and freshest strategic nuclear forces - only UTILIZATION WITH THE USE of the old, but very effective nuclear weapons of the Land of Soviets.
              And "Boreas" and "Maces" will be useful to us for the future. For the World of the Future must be stable.
              1. 0
                4 October 2022 05: 34
                Thanks for the helpful comment.
                No one planned to discharge all three Boreas. Only one and the minimum sufficient salvo should be fired (two warheads from different missiles for each designated target).
                Why Boreas with Maces - because only they have sufficient stealth to get lost in the expanses of the ocean and wait in the wings. And when one shoots out, the remaining two will be a kind of underwater Cuba of the 1962 model. Since the Americans are constantly monitoring our bases, they will know that somewhere, perhaps another 192 - 320 high-precision express delivery warheads lurk on their shores. And all the calculations for some kind of strikes against our troops turn into the defeat of objects on our own territory.
                And Satan, Poplars and Yarsy should be deployed by this time.
                1. +2
                  4 October 2022 07: 21
                  "Voivodas", "Poplars" and "Yarsy" have long been deployed and have been in a "Special Degree of Combat Readiness" throughout the entire NMD - well, this is how the Supreme High Command formulated. Let's call it humanly - increased combat readiness.
                  The rest is nonsense - after the launch of the SSGN missiles, they will immediately be detected and destroyed by enemy PLO aircraft. That is why they are kept on duty along the ice of the Arctic Ocean or in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk - away from these birds and enemy ships.
                  If you uncover the strategic nuclear forces, then you have to beat everyone at once. With a guarantee and on the spot. Everything else is nonsense.
                  1. 0
                    4 October 2022 07: 36
                    The rest is nonsense - after the launch of the SSGN missiles, they will immediately be detected and destroyed by enemy aircraft.

                    They will not be destroyed!
                    No one who has shot Borey will lay a finger on him. There are two more I don't know where. No one will risk starting self-destruction due to the use of nuclear weapons on OUR TERRITORY. And ksatiti, speaking in our opinion, not SSBNs but SSBNs. Yes, and detecting the SSBN in low-noise mode in the ocean is unrealistic, only in the straits.
                2. 0
                  4 October 2022 09: 20
                  Quote: Victor Leningradets
                  Thanks for the helpful comment.
                  No one planned to discharge all three Boreas. Only one and the minimum sufficient salvo should be fired (two warheads from different missiles for each designated target).

                  in Metro 2033 wanted?
          2. -1
            4 October 2022 14: 01
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            This is exactly what the States are trying to achieve: a nuclear bombing in Europe! And they are behind a large puddle, in the "house". That's the whole point.

            So we are with ours. Who will answer us in Europe after tactical nuclear strikes on the territory of Romania, Poland and the Baltic states?

            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            Yes, in general, it’s purple for me, what the mongrels will do. The main thing is to castrate Uncle Sam in time!

            The question was not about mongrels, but the subsequent reaction of the United States, that is, whom and how they will begin to surrender!
        2. 0
          3 October 2022 22: 31
          Quote: Damir Zakirov
          A retaliatory series of tactical nuclear strikes on military bases in Romania, Poland and the Baltic states will follow. Quite an equal exchange for both parties!

          The author wants an answer, here it is. I would just roll one Poland into the glass. It's enough. And then for everyone, and above all for the United States and Britain, there will be a choice: either to share the fate of the Poles, even at the cost of destroying us, or to limit ourselves to the fact that they have already introduced the toughest boycott of Russia (according to the author). I doubt very much that they will choose the first one, in twenty years they will begin to slowly accuse Poland of inadequacy and slowly lift sanctions. If it happens according to the scenario described in the article, then we essentially have nothing to lose, if we don’t answer, then they will begin to level us specifically, beat the weak, and simply destroy those who were afraid before.
          1. -1
            4 October 2022 14: 09
            Quote: qqqq
            And then for everyone, and above all for the United States and Britain, there will be a choice: either to share the fate of the Poles, even at the cost of destroying us, or to limit ourselves to the fact that they have already introduced the toughest boycott of Russia (according to the author)

            Yes, under the Union they understood that in land battles the Warsaw Pact would "roll them out" on the continent. Therefore, at every aggravation they threatened us with the use of nuclear weapons. The roles have changed and now we threaten them with nuclear weapons.

            Quote: qqqq
            If it happens according to the scenario described in the article, then we essentially have nothing to lose, if we don’t answer, then they will begin to level us specifically, beat the weak, and simply destroy those who were afraid before.

            I served in the SA and nuclear war was considered by us only as a subsequent stage. The same will happen here - no one will bend a "point" before the West!
            1. +1
              4 October 2022 16: 18
              Quote: Damir Zakirov
              I served in the SA and nuclear war was considered by us only as a subsequent stage. The same will happen here - no one will bend a "point" before the West!

              I also served in the SA, I don’t remember much about nuclear weapons that this issue strained someone, it was not seriously considered. I would like to believe that the leadership and the so-called "elite" ... will not bend before the West. It makes no sense to delay the use of nuclear weapons if NATO intervenes more openly, we cannot resist (now we can hardly breathe only with the support of supplies), so why lose people without meaning, it’s better to hit right away.
              1. -1
                4 October 2022 16: 56
                Quote: qqqq
                I also served in the SA, I don’t remember much about nuclear weapons that this issue strained someone, it was not seriously considered. I would like to believe that the leadership and the so-called "elite" ... will not bend before the West. It makes no sense to delay the use of nuclear weapons if NATO intervenes more openly, we cannot resist (now we can hardly breathe only with the support of supplies), so why lose people without meaning, it’s better to hit right away.

                I wrote about that and that the roles have changed. There was a three millionth SA and a five millionth with the countries of the Warsaw Pact. Of course, the millionth army of the Russian Federation is not comparable in power to the "eighties"!

                Personally, I believe that a doctrine should be adopted to destroy the North American continent with minimal damage to us. And as soon as the technology allows, then immediately implement it, even despite the favorable geopolitical situation.

                In the meantime, to maneuver, without substituting asses and without dropping honor!
                1. +1
                  4 October 2022 20: 40
                  Quote: Damir Zakirov
                  Personally, I believe that a doctrine should be adopted for the destruction of the North American continent with minimal damage to us.

                  Personally, I think that this should not be done without the open intervention of the United States, then they will come after us. The goal should be a country that no one feels sorry for. Poland is perfect for this. I doubt anyone would want to share her fate. The doctrine must be changed, a clause must be introduced into it that if we are "offended", then we can inflict a preemptive nuclear weapon, moreover, with the condition of the complete elimination of the threat even in the distant future, i.e. subtly hint that nothing and no one will be there anymore. Along the way, we have nothing to lose.
            2. +1
              4 October 2022 19: 50
              Our main advantage is a pre-emptive nuclear strike and a forced march of tank troops to the English Channel.
              Chief Marshal of the Armored Forces P.A. Rotmistrov 1968
      3. +12
        3 October 2022 20: 22
        This is not a reason to stand as a submissive cow and wait for the butcher to sharpen his knife!
        The example of today's hostilities confirms the inferiority of this situation: he is poking our defense in accordance with his Wishlist, and we are running and plugging holes!
        There are no initiatives of ours to run along the front, and the defense never led to the capture of enemy positions, only to new lines of defense.
        The United States blew up our pipes, and we cry out and groan ... That's it, the whole world is watching how we "concern" and draws its conclusions. Let them not be true, but they do.
        The world did not hear from us: "We will find who did this and he will answer for anyone!"
        Our silence and inaction no longer frighten .... Our "red lines" have become a byword!
        All NATO generals and generals, all American senators and congressmen point a stick at us and argue when it is time to start cutting the "cow" !!!
        They wanted to spit on our Iskanders, Yars and Poplars - not a single hair has fallen on their heads today! We are waving "goodwill gestures" at them, releasing the Azov cannibals, pushing how to sell more gas to the factories where Susannas and Cheetahs make with the Caesars ..... "we are at war" - sir, so to speak!

        Someone said ... If shame is chosen between death and shame, then they get both!
        1. Aag
          +1
          3 October 2022 22: 27
          Quote: Sebastian Aristarkhovich Pereira
          This is not a reason to stand as a submissive cow and wait for the butcher to sharpen his knife!
          The example of today's hostilities confirms the inferiority of this situation: he is poking our defense in accordance with his Wishlist, and we are running and plugging holes!
          There are no initiatives of ours to run along the front, and the defense never led to the capture of enemy positions, only to new lines of defense.
          The United States blew up our pipes, and we cry out and groan ... That's it, the whole world is watching how we "concern" and draws its conclusions. Let them not be true, but they do.
          The world did not hear from us: "We will find who did this and he will answer for anyone!"
          Our silence and inaction no longer frighten .... Our "red lines" have become a byword!
          All NATO generals and generals, all American senators and congressmen point a stick at us and argue when it is time to start cutting the "cow" !!!
          They wanted to spit on our Iskanders, Yars and Poplars - not a single hair has fallen on their heads today! We are waving "goodwill gestures" at them, releasing the Azov cannibals, pushing how to sell more gas to the factories where Susannas and Cheetahs make with the Caesars ..... "we are at war" - sir, so to speak!

          Someone said ... If shame is chosen between death and shame, then they get both!

          Emotionally, rudely, but ... - in fact ...
          "Plus", - definitely, no matter how it turned out in the consequences ...
          No, - I do not change pride, pride, - the life of my children, for ... For what? On the fat life of the oligarchs? Ours, the shtatovskih (by the way, it seems that they, the shtatovskih, are linking their fate with their state ... Unlike domestic ones. (Try to dissuade me of this with facts, believe me, I will be grateful).
          In the meantime, it remains to hope for the strategic nuclear forces, the Strategic Missile Forces (not there for a long time, not everything is rosy, but, I hope, even the uncertainty factor itself will allow to cool bitter heads ...
        2. +2
          3 October 2022 22: 33
          Quote: Sebastian Aristarkhovich Pereira
          Someone said ... If shame is chosen between death and shame, then they get both!

          Churchill. If you choose shame between war and shame, then in the end you will get both war and shame. This is the result of the conclusion of the Munich agreement.
      4. 0
        4 October 2022 14: 16
        There is a CNBC video about lithographic machines, it claims that the states are transporting a processor factory from Taiwan, Intel is building several factories, in the coming years they will build 19 factories related to the manufacture of chips and processors, there is also news that 60 companies are moving from Germany to the USA. The states have big plans for the future, they want to move the core of globalization to themselves and prosper, nuclear war is not included in their plans
        Pipes "stream" were blown up to encourage the EU to buy shale gas, they also use an already proven method to get out of the crisis - arms sales. It is possible that the United States has advice to develop careful "impacts" on the Russian Federation so as not to provoke a nuclear war.
        It's funny that the guarantor of expensive partners called the evil Anglo-Saxons and put all the blame on them.
    2. +3
      3 October 2022 19: 30
      Let me remind you "In connection with the current visit to the city of Hiroshima by the American President (Obama), the Japanese government did not demand an 'apology from the United States'." Something like this. Who are they to demand an apology from the Master.
      1. Aag
        0
        3 October 2022 22: 40
        Quote: Serge Petrof
        Let me remind you "In connection with the current visit to the city of Hiroshima by the American President (Obama), the Japanese government did not demand an 'apology from the United States'." Something like this. Who are they to demand an apology from the Master.

        Iii ... You can convince them otherwise - the truth It seems that even the USSR could not .. (now ... I am silent).
        You can, - in front of everyone, I promise my vote in support of your candidacy, party))).
    3. 0
      3 October 2022 19: 57
      And who is this "Vladimir Vladimirovich"?
      1. -2
        3 October 2022 21: 02
        Much more effective than all strikes would be the destruction of submarine cables connecting the United States with Britain and other countries! These cables carry interbank traffic, the destruction of which will bring losses hundreds of times greater than the loss of both gas pipelines! American TV presenter Tucker Carlson said that if Russia wants to take revenge and break the cable, then the US and British economies will slide into the stone age! So why not help the guys with this? They tried so hard and sweated, blowing up Russian property! Send the submarine "Losharik" with a bathyscaphe, chop the cable into cabbage, and hang the pieces on the bottoms of the ships of the American allies - Japan, Australia, etc. And let them creak their brains, thinking - how did it get there? And on all the accusations, make a face with a brick, declaring that those who blew up the Nord Streams to quarrel us did it - the Ukrainians, to avenge the "Khokhlokost" that the Armed Forces of Ukraine receive from the Russian army! But I'm afraid that the Kremlin will not do anything from the word at all! The exchange of Medvedchuk for the Azov people with the help of the former "chief of Chukotka" - Abramovich makes me think about this. It seems that this "reindeer" was chosen by Putin as a channel of communication with Western elites, for which he and gave away the British mercenaries, to whom he gave the latest models of iPhones. So the Kremlin quietly wants to negotiate. Sadness ...
      2. +1
        3 October 2022 21: 12
        Quote: Spasatel
        And who is this "Vladimir Vladimirovich"?

        Crap! According to the author’s reasoning, it’s probably POZDNER !!! laughing
        1. +7
          4 October 2022 10: 28
          Here they suggest - this is an artist, nothing more. He is especially good at Red Lines.
    4. -1
      4 October 2022 11: 28
      This has always angered me. The Americans wiped out two Japanese cities from the face of the Earth, but nevertheless, Japan and Washington have quite close relations. How is this even possible?
  2. +11
    3 October 2022 16: 07
    Russia will be expelled and excluded from everywhere, recognized as a terrorist country, trade is prohibited and subject to jurisdiction, all assets are arrested, including diplomatic ones.

    They themselves came up with the consequences - they themselves were frightened. Wild fantasy.
    1. 0
      3 October 2022 17: 10
      Quote: Pulkovo1942
      Wild fantasy.

      I wish there was a fantasy, pfu, pfu, pfu!
    2. 0
      3 October 2022 20: 41
      Quote: Pulkovo1942
      They themselves came up with the consequences - they themselves were frightened.

      It's funny, but I saw this in the films mentioned by the author George Lucas. Oh Enichka...
  3. +8
    3 October 2022 16: 10
    Ground explosion, you can use a standard American B61 charge, for example, the 12th series with a variable charge, optimally 10 kilotons, secretly delivered from occupied Germany

    Will not work. Simply because it will be clear from the remains of the explosion whose device was blown up. Up to which plant it was collected, and where the uranium was mined, from which it was collected.
    1. +3
      3 October 2022 16: 19
      where the uranium was mined, from which it was collected.
      They can use Russian uranium to assemble the product, which the Russian Federation sent tons to America as part of the "I don't remember which" program. But what she supplied is a fact.
      1. +7
        3 October 2022 16: 35
        I'm afraid that with such a provocation we will simply be driven into a dead end and there will be no way out ... there is only one way out, we are in heaven and they are in hell!
        1. 0
          3 October 2022 21: 25
          Quote: marchcat
          there is only one way out, we go to heaven and they go to hell!

          "And it's too early for us to die
          We still have things to do at home! "(C)
          Nope, I can't do that! laughing
      2. +4
        3 October 2022 16: 58
        They won't be able to. A nuclear weapon is not an improvised explosive device assembled in a garage.
        1. +2
          3 October 2022 17: 13
          Quote: Sergey Valov
          A nuclear weapon is not an improvised explosive device assembled in a garage.

          "Helpers" for such a case are available and they are sitting in Institute for Nuclear Research, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
          03028, Kiev, 47 Nauki Ave.
    2. +3
      3 October 2022 16: 28
      I support, this is all very simply calculated, provided that the IAEA is interested in revealing the truth
      1. +1
        3 October 2022 16: 45
        Will she be interested? That's right, everyone has already been named who and what !!!
      2. +2
        3 October 2022 17: 14
        Quote: rotkiv04
        this is all very simply calculated, provided that the IAEA is interested in revealing the truth

        Well, how did the IAEA help being at the Zaporozhye NPP, and to whom.
    3. +2
      3 October 2022 16: 28
      Will not work. Simply because it will be clear from the remains of the explosion whose device was blown up. Up to which plant it was collected, and where the uranium was mined, from which it was collected.
      They do provocations in order to make everything work out. Who will check the explosion? Right ours. The entire West will speak out. that this is not true. then they will carry out actions, well, remember how the black test tube was shaking. And then scout oh we were wrong. But nothing can be corrected. So it is better not to allow provocations.
      1. +4
        3 October 2022 17: 20
        Quote: Gardamir
        They do provocations in order to make everything work out.

        By blowing up the pipelines, they showed their wolf teeth, and now they will start to bite harder. They have nowhere to retreat and they have no time. A month will pass and the world will understand who blew up and why, they now need to hurry.
      2. +1
        3 October 2022 20: 31
        The default of the US and Britain we will disassemble at the UN and shake Jr. can's laptop, ugh Hunter Biden wassat
    4. +3
      3 October 2022 16: 29
      it will be clear whose device was blown up.
      Everyone will be fine.
    5. +6
      3 October 2022 16: 29
      Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
      Will not work. Simply because it will be clear from the remains of the explosion whose device was blown up.

      "After a fight, they don't wave their fists," a minute after the explosion, all the world's media will announce in terrible pictures that Russia is a terrorist country, an hour later the UN will confirm this.
      And no one will investigate, they just won't give it, or you forgot the Boeing, Yugoslavia and Libya.
      1. 0
        3 October 2022 20: 46
        Quote: tihonmarine
        in an hour, the UN will confirm this.

        She won't confirm anything. All serious things go through the Security Council, in which Russia can veto all resolutions without any restrictions. The General Assembly can even take a shit: its resolutions are purely advisory in nature.
        But in general, yes, the UN will not be needed for this. They just appointed the culprit, and then whatever you say ... You start putting forward evidence: "Yeah, if they make excuses, then they are guilty." You will be silent: "So, there is something to hide."
        Damn, I would say that I don’t think that there are people in the West capable of arranging this, but after the Currents ...
    6. +5
      3 October 2022 16: 52
      Who will be clear? Those who put a Korean Boeing on us? Who Donbass shells itself?
      And who in general will be engaged in finding out when they receive an indication that Russia is to blame for everything?
      One hope is that on the other side they also honor Sun Tzu and guess that the enemy driven into a corner is fighting to the death ...
    7. +1
      3 October 2022 18: 20
      So the point is that no one is going to understand and find out something. Just need a formal reason for the appointment of the guilty, which is appointed in advance. Type: "Let me smoke!" on a dark street. And let them smoke or not, events develop in the same way.
    8. +3
      3 October 2022 21: 21
      Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
      Ground explosion, you can use a standard American B61 charge, for example, the 12th series with a variable charge, optimally 10 kilotons, secretly delivered from occupied Germany

      Will not work. Simply because it will be clear from the remains of the explosion whose device was blown up. Up to which plant it was collected, and where the uranium was mined, from which it was collected.

      This is true, but on the condition that there will be an FAIR INVESTIGATION, for example, by the IAEA commission. But the thing is that everything will be like in the investigation with the Boeing MH-117...
      Anglo-Saxons don't just "hiley like" anything and everything. They won't let anyone open their mouths...
      Therefore, the GDP is doing the right thing, which is gathering a parallel "gang" with the participation of China, India, Brazil, the SA, Iran and other "tolerants" dissatisfied with the hegemon. Whales will pick up some vigorous beaters (by 2026 they plan to reach the level of 1000 megaton-class SBP, they will rivet DF-41 - then we'll see who the KING OF THE MOUNT will be!)
      So, you need to destroy the DOLLAR empire, and not throw vigorous bonbes at each other!
      AHA.
    9. 0
      4 October 2022 19: 56
      Well, how much can this nonsense be replicated!
      In Chernobyl, there is a natural background from the explosion and the release of fissile material and isotopes from the reactor (tens of TONS), and it is proposed to superimpose a couple more KILOGRAMS of reaction products separated by a shock wave and drift of a high-temperature cloud for tens of kilometers. They will measure the isotopic composition (even if) and say "Chernobyl, however!"
  4. -2
    3 October 2022 16: 14
    Yah you. Don't you know what will happen? Foreign Ministry to express concern.
  5. -4
    3 October 2022 16: 14
    Salvation plan? They must know that by doing this they will be hit in Washington and London. There are no other options. We are in heaven, they will die. Let them take the risk.
    1. +6
      3 October 2022 16: 23
      will be hit in Washington and London.
      dispute will not receive!
      1. 0
        3 October 2022 16: 31
        Let's argue. Because then the script of the author will come true. Therefore, the Anglo-Saxons do not do this. It would have been done long ago. But they are urging us to do it. Strike TNW on b. Ukrainian SSR. For them, it will be a victory. Read the author's script.
        1. -1
          3 October 2022 17: 11
          What victory? They are just afraid of fire. After all, in addition to the striking, it is also a psychological effect. No wonder the CIPSO throws in 100 articles. The bastards are afraid, oh, how they are afraid!
          1. -4
            3 October 2022 17: 19
            Who is afraid? Americans? What are they afraid of? Now the majority of the world does not support us, but they do not condemn us either. Everyone is frozen and waiting. And after TNW they will be forced to make a choice. And they will do it not in our favor. Right now, hundreds of thousands of compatriots rushed to lick the ass of Georgians, Kazakhs, etc. And after the use of tactical nuclear weapons, this will not help either. We will be surrounded by a fence. And we'll all beg on our knees to forgive us. Is not it?
            1. +4
              3 October 2022 17: 30
              If we retreat at such a pace, then they will make a choice anyway. This simple thought does not occur to you.
              Well, they will enclose a fence, and then what? The territory is too big and no fence will help here.
              No one will beg or beg, because there is no point.
              But if ours successfully use tactics and it will have a great damaging and effective effect on the Ukrainian troops, then guess where they can rush? Of course, to the rich West. They will sweep away the Polish border guards and the Black Horde will spread with weapons throughout Europe. That's what they're afraid of. And here you are scribbling opuses about fences. They will have such a Bartholomew there that the living will envy the Huguenots. What did Blok write about the Huns? "And drive a herd to the church, and the meat of white brothers will be fried"
              1. -1
                3 October 2022 19: 23
                Let's say we burn nuclear weapons of the former Ukrainian SSR. What's next? And then there will be what the author drew. Blockade. Can we make carts? Where can we get horses? Shall we make a bough-harrow? No internet or other perks. Yes, as long as they do not need to undermine something. No matter how this wave of mobilized people plays the role of nuclear weapons. How they will rush, smashing Russia to smithereens. No Minin and Pozharsky. There are no citizens. There are no people. There is an elite and a population. Roar is worth it. Nobody wants to die for their country.
                1. +3
                  3 October 2022 21: 42
                  Quote: Dmitry Donyakin
                  Let's say we burn nuclear weapons of the former Ukrainian SSR.

                  What the hell are you talking about!?
                  We did not do nuclear weapons in order to kill Ukrainians with them! And in order (if necessary!) to reason with NATO! And knock out Uncle Sam and John Bull's teeth!!!
                  Can you finally understand this or not? fool
                  1. +1
                    3 October 2022 22: 45
                    We did it to protect our citizens. And Ukrainians or Australians - there is no difference. The enemy must be destroyed. Or are you a supporter of the fraternal theory? Well, we are fierce enemies for them, and the enemy (any) must be destroyed.
                  2. -1
                    4 October 2022 18: 36
                    Do you know how to read? How about thinking about what you read?
                2. -1
                  3 October 2022 22: 43
                  What's next? The capitulation of the Ukroreich.
                  Blockade? Well, why are you standing, run to Kazakhstan. They really say bai Russians are not very fond of.
                  You can live without the Internet and other amenities. Without water, no.
                  Where will they break? To your wife? So run with your wife to Karaganda.
                  There is no you, but the people are. So go along with the people of New Kazakhstan to Ekibastuz.
            2. +2
              3 October 2022 17: 33
              Now hundreds of thousands of compatriots rushed to lick the fifth point of Georgians, Kazakhs, etc.. And after the use of tactical nuclear weapons, this will not help either. We will be surrounded by a fence. And we'll all be on our knees beg us to forgive.


              Not all, but those who rushed to lick the ass.
            3. 0
              3 October 2022 19: 08
              Jackals make a choice only in favor of a more ferocious predator. Law of nature.
              And we depict a calf.
            4. +4
              3 October 2022 21: 38
              Quote: Dmitry Donyakin
              We will be surrounded by a fence. And we will all beg on our knees to forgive us. Is not it?

              Not this way!
              Only traitors and cowards can do this!!! We are Russians !!! And here, unlike others, the whole history was: BETTER TO DIE STANDING THAN TO LIVE ON YOUR KNEES!
              This is an Italian proverb: - ​​It is better to be a coward for 10 minutes than to be a dead man all your life!
              As they say -- feel the difference ! am
              1. -3
                4 October 2022 18: 39
                I don't see it yet. Among the mobilized there is rampant drunkenness, continuous claims and a clear unwillingness to fight. Maybe it's different in other regions. God bless.
    2. +3
      3 October 2022 16: 53
      They should know this, but they know for sure that they will get off with deep concern and the transfer of red lines.
      You are half a century late with certainty.
      1. -2
        3 October 2022 17: 27
        Let's say. They undermine, we express. Complete blockade. Absolute. Do you think that if you hand over Putin, the Crimea, the Kuriles, Kaliningrad to them, will this appease them? No. Everything will have to be surrendered. Both Motherland and mother. And there is nowhere to go. Hundreds of thousands have faded now. Abandoning children and mothers. AND? Where do they hope to return? In the ghetto? And our elite and the ghetto will not be given. So there is only one choice and way out. Therefore, the Americans in Kyiv have not yet fucked.
        1. +1
          3 October 2022 17: 38
          If not for eight years of uncontested Minsk, there would be a subject for discussion.
          And so, alas...
          We have a "vertical", that is, the top leadership receives the information that is beneficial to inconspicuous officials of a much lower rank, who do not risk their heads in case of defeat. An absolutely incorrect assessment of the position before the start of the operation showed this well.
        2. 0
          3 October 2022 18: 36
          Quote: Dmitry Donyakin
          Where do they hope to return?
          What makes you think they're going to come back?
          Quote: Dmitry Donyakin
          Abandoning children and mothers.
          Real estate will be bought, repairs will be made and transported.
          1. -1
            3 October 2022 19: 17
            Do friendly Kazakhs and Georgians need them?
            1. 0
              3 October 2022 21: 47
              Quote: Dmitry Donyakin
              Do friendly Kazakhs and Georgians need them?
              Maybe the Georgians would need them, but these are just transfer points: it is difficult to fly out of Russia now. They are now handed out summonses upon departure, which are a document that practically guarantees the receipt of refugee status, so that they will not stay in Georgia and Kazakhstan.
    3. -2
      3 October 2022 18: 22
      they will get hit in Washington and London.

      Rather, Shoigu will shy away from ... Voronezh!
      There definitely aren't any!
  6. +11
    3 October 2022 16: 15
    This is an unlikely scenario. According to him, Russia is "driven into a corner." And who has nothing to lose can really slander someone for real. As Comrade Carlson said (not verbatim): I was accused without evidence of stealing pancakes, I really have to eat them so that the accusations are not groundless.
  7. +3
    3 October 2022 16: 16
    It will not work to give out their charge for ours smile According to the measurements after the explosion, it will be possible to say exactly what exactly banged, the bomb of which country, sometimes, right down to the manufacturer)) So it is precisely such a provocation that is canceled! good
    1. HAM
      +3
      3 October 2022 16: 34
      And who will measure it? Do not be naive, at least piss in your eyes (sorry for being rude) .... even if they are caught red-handed, they will get away, their propaganda machine works at its best ..
    2. +2
      3 October 2022 16: 35
      "Boeing" who shot down? Who shot Nemtsov? Bucha? Kramotorsk? and so on. Putin. And he will explode the charge. Who will doubt?
    3. +2
      3 October 2022 18: 24
      No one will measure anything, they will simply say that everything is already clear.
    4. -3
      3 October 2022 19: 11
      Is this against the background of 192 tons of splattered nuclear fuel from the reactor?
      Don't laugh, pensioner.
      1. 0
        4 October 2022 20: 01
        Well, show me the methodology for isolating the isotopes of the explosion, separated by tens of kilometers from the general background of the Chernobyl accident.
        Everyone turn on their heads and learn physics!
  8. HAM
    +3
    3 October 2022 16: 16
    The author described a very real option. It’s not for nothing that all the former (so far former officials) of various levels keep talking about the use of nuclear weapons by Russia, the ground is being prepared for a provocation, and they’ll do it the way they need to, they’ll do it ..... everything is straightforward and stupid, but it works, the electorate hawala without the thoughts of the righteous ....
    1. 0
      3 October 2022 20: 52
      I'm interested here. We here in Russia ponder the words of our government and sometimes think: "No, they're definitely lying here." Then, when you don’t know what to say at all, they begin. At a minimum, skeptical "Aha-aha" in their direction are regular. In the West, people seem to be no less, if not more, educated. This means that there should be much more critical thinking. What, they will directly take and believe in such a stupid provocation?
  9. +1
    3 October 2022 16: 25
    Yes, after Simonyan the fantasy is played out ....
    And I don’t care that (they said) the isotopic composition of nuclear weapons is easy to read, and it’s a little different for everyone.

    In general, after 14 years, fantasy in PR is growing ... whatever, "unprecedented growth, remember what."

    Already the fat was running out, and the vodka, and in Mriya they hid the Yader baton, and "Europe will freeze and die out", and "there will be no mobilization", "Medvedchuk is not ours", and much, much more

    IMHO, the population is completely weaned from critical thinking ...
    1. +2
      3 October 2022 17: 35
      IMHO, the population is completely weaned from critical thinking ...

      And what about Simonyan? This is THEIR population weaned from thinking, ours will happily say, well, finally.
      1. -1
        3 October 2022 18: 25
        1) Taki Simonyan was the first to say, officially and loudly, that Putin could gasp. It was after the article that the stream went ...
        2) Finally - that the Russians will approve the nuclear explosion in Ukraine, no matter whose? Or that Medvedchuk was exchanged for Azov? More specific
        1. +2
          3 October 2022 18: 38
          More specifically, please.
          The whole article is about preparing THEIR population for the fact that we will launch a nuclear strike.
          Simonyan is now, in the sense of a mouthpiece for their population, just nobody, like Solovyov or you and me. So I ask where Simonyan and THEIR population have to do with it?

          If you are talking about our population. Then he does not need to be prepared for the fact that the Russian Federation can use tactical nuclear weapons in Europe. No, because the networks are simply teeming with calls to strike tactical nuclear weapons at headquarters, logistics centers and government bodies in Ukraine.
          I then (apparently, together with the Supreme laughing ) I think this is unacceptable. And it is not at all because of how the world will react to it, it is unacceptable to use tactical nuclear weapons on its territory.
          1. -1
            3 October 2022 23: 14
            "The whole article is about preparing THEIR population for the fact that we will launch a nuclear strike ..."
            went mass (and not singly in strange places) after one of the mouthpieces of the Kremlin - Simonyan - stated this. (maybe someone else)
            At least in the retelling of our media.

            And at the "decision centers" they first talked about strikes without nuclear weapons, both in articles and in comments (rare exceptions)

            But ... it means that it is beneficial for someone to catch up with hysteria in our country, since articles went one after another, Kadyrov spoke, the media, polished political scientists, commentators .... Everyone is already used to what the Kremlin says one thing - but it can do the opposite.

            And what is there over the hill ... Historically, the media watch and write too much - "but how is it over the hill then ...?"

            It's just that a lot of people have a short memory. What was written recently - no one remembers ... (stupefaction, IMHO)
            1. 0
              4 October 2022 12: 43
              Like one of the mouthpieces of the Kremlin

              No need to use the clichés of the Soviet era.
              There is a press secretary, there is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, there is a press center of the Moscow Region. All other mouthpieces are in your head.
              1. -1
                4 October 2022 13: 03
                This is already nitpicking
                Meanwhile, only yesterday, Peskov reacted to Kadyrov's words about the possibility of strikes by our nuclear weapons - there are notes everywhere in the media, etc.
                1. 0
                  4 October 2022 15: 12
                  This is already nitpicking

                  I don't pick on. Who is Simonyan - now just a journalist.
                  Therefore, it is NOT NECESSARY to consider her words as the opinion of the Kremlin.
                  We have freedom of speech and her words are no different from yours.
                  Learn to distinguish the statements of citizens from the statements of officials.
                  1. -1
                    4 October 2022 17: 32
                    How did you stick to the details, "Who is Simonyan"
                    When it was just a wake-up call, and the media, Putin, Peskov, Kadyrov, experts and authors - here, and not somewhere else, are discussing the possibility with might and main.
                    1. 0
                      4 October 2022 17: 57
                      How did you stick to the details, "Who is Simonyan"

                      There are people behind these details. The position of the forest is cut down, chips fly very expensive for our country.

                      In fact
                      1. All officials in the Russian Federation deny the possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons within the framework of the NWO.
                      2. A lot of officials outside the Russian Federation claim that there is a high probability that Russia will use tactical nuclear weapons within the framework of the NMD.

                      The rest is innuendo.
                      1. -1
                        4 October 2022 21: 45
                        Exactly. Almost agreed.
                        All true.
                        Either they didn’t chat at all, or suddenly they “deny the possibility of using it” massively, and some people admit it.

                        And the media, experts, authors and commentators - all the more began to enthusiastically write and comment. At VO, for example, there were 1-2 articles / notes per day

                        Naturally, the "collective west" reacted.
                        Well, and only the lazy did not write the "return" in our and their media)))
          2. 0
            4 October 2022 06: 00
            And why is it actually unacceptable if the alternative is a long-term slaughter with no chance of victory and the practical loss of statehood, as in 1918 in Germany.
            That's just not necessary about the infection of the area. With a high-altitude explosion of a powerful charge, you can get a powerful shock wave and very weak contamination of the area. An example is the explosion of the Tsar bomb on Novaya Zemlya on 30.10.1961/XNUMX/XNUMX.
  10. +2
    3 October 2022 16: 28
    Everyone has forgotten the simple truth - In order not to be afraid yourself, do not threaten anyone. Everything turns out, as an impressionable woman herself thinks up, she cries or laughs. There are too many predators. And in nature there is a rule that when there are more predators than peaceful animals, they simply die out.
  11. +2
    3 October 2022 16: 32
    author-->author-->author, go get some sleep, drink some valerian.
  12. 0
    3 October 2022 16: 36
    Quote: rotkiv04
    I support, this is all very simply calculated, provided that the IAEA is interested in revealing the truth

    There is a possibility that we won’t find out, we’ll just hit the bases in Poland and Romania.
    1. +2
      3 October 2022 21: 55
      Quote: Pavel57
      just hit the bases in Poland and Romania.

      Probably, under certain conditions, such an option is also possible ... But not with nuclear, but with high-precision, conventional (conventional) weapons. With a volumetric detonating warhead, for example ... bully
      1. 0
        3 October 2022 23: 50
        And what is stopping us from leaving strategic offensive arms and increasing the number of deployed carriers?
  13. AB
    -2
    3 October 2022 16: 39
    Yeah, you can’t refuse the author’s imagination obviously. That's just the Chernobyl nuclear power plant was taken under control by Russian troops on February 24th. Zaporozhye NPP is also under control. Here at the South Ukrainian NPP, that in the Nikolaev region they can, but they lied because they spoil themselves more. So far, the Russian Armed Forces have not gone on the offensive in the Nikolaevsky direction. Incl. The author's script is currently not viable...
    1. +3
      3 October 2022 16: 48
      Quote: AB
      . But the Chernobyl nuclear power plant was taken under control by Russian troops on February 24th.

      Did the news of April 2, about the fact that we left the Kyiv region and handed over the Chernobyl nuclear power plant to Ukraine, pass you by?

      And the scenario is very real. The United States needs the use of nuclear weapons by Russia.
      1. +2
        3 October 2022 17: 14
        Rave. This is exactly what the States do not need, since everything can go according to an unpredictable scenario. And then they will be under attack. That's why they throw in so many articles that the skin is shaking.
    2. +1
      3 October 2022 16: 51
      Here at the South Ukrainian NPP, that in the Nikolaev region they can, but they lied because they spoil themselves more

      If there is a detonation of a nuclear warhead, then most likely somewhere on our territory. Donbass is ideal. He has already left Ukraine, we are temporarily retreating. So do not get you to anyone - apparently they will be guided by such logic. Yes, and the wind so that the main thing is not east towards Ukraine. And so there is a circle of our lands.
      1. 0
        3 October 2022 20: 55
        No, if this is done, then the wind should be just in the direction of Ukraine and Europe, so that you can announce to everyone: "In six months, millions of you will get cancer and die. Because of Russia." wink
    3. ANB
      0
      3 October 2022 16: 53
      . The Chernobyl nuclear power plant was taken under control by Russian troops on February 24

      Our people left Chernobyl.
  14. -1
    3 October 2022 16: 39
    I also had a very realistic dream with a similar scenario, but only with a bottom explosion in the Black Sea, which raised a huge amount of hydrogen sulfide from the depths, so that all coastal countries got it. But I console myself with the thought that I'm just an old paranoid.... lol
    1. +1
      3 October 2022 16: 45
      Even if you are paranoid, it does not mean that your fears are groundless.
    2. 0
      3 October 2022 20: 57
      I had even better sleep. It's like I'm lying in the dark and then for some reason I turn on the flashlight. I point at the wall, and in the place where I pointed, some kind of mug appears, and begins to say some important things to me. But, fortunately, it ended quickly.
  15. +7
    3 October 2022 16: 50
    Disasters began 30 years ago, now the consequences have begun. "God save America and Russia" (c)
  16. +4
    3 October 2022 16: 52
    One question to the author, why is the United States doing such a provocation now? They groped for our weakness, they have not yet transferred anything serious to the Armed Forces of Ukraine from aircraft, cruise missiles, modern tanks, and the fighting is already not going as it was expected in February. Plus, we are undergoing partial mobilization, which will certainly affect the economy and the social situation.
  17. 0
    3 October 2022 16: 52
    Well, it won’t come to this (and there’s simply no need), because it’s very tricky.
    But to put a rake, it's always welcome. The entire world elite knows the Russian elite as flaky. I mean, you just need to push the top in the Kremlin to the collapse of the country, and greed is a win-win option.
  18. +5
    3 October 2022 16: 59
    Let's assume that the provocation was successful and "someone" detonated a nuclear warhead in Chernobyl, Kyiv or Lvov.
    And then what? Russia is accused of nuclear terrorism and...
    -reinforce sanctions - let them increase. All the same, stronger than now, they will not strengthen.
    -excluded from the UN Security Council - legally it will not work. To do this, it is necessary to dissolve the UN itself.
    -they respond with a NATO (American) nuclear strike on Moscow or on any other city in Russia - they will instantly receive a thermonuclear response on Washington, London, Paris, etc., i.e. all-out thermonuclear war. If the Anglo-Saxons were not sure that they would definitely receive a nuclear response, they would have attacked Russia long ago.
    Therefore, at best, this is just blackmail, and at worst, the death of thousands of citizens of Ukraine. And that's all. There will be no continuation, except for the pig squeal of their media.
    1. +3
      3 October 2022 17: 35
      NATO (states) is becoming more and more impudent, on the rise, taking into account the lack of will of the Kremlin and the mediocre waging of the war by them. The explosion of gas pipelines is a very serious kick. crying If it was followed by corresponding sabotage at NATO facilities and attacks on centers, then maybe this cooled some of the enthusiasm of the mattress. But it was not there No. We are waiting, as always, for a fair and unbiased assessment in a state of deep concern (stupor). belay
  19. +3
    3 October 2022 17: 08
    Some nonsense. Liberoid article aimed at God forbid.
  20. +2
    3 October 2022 17: 11
    I think Russia should publicly promise that Russia will use nuclear weapons EXCLUSIVELY on US soil. Wherever and whoever provoked it. The answer is ONLY in the United States. And the answer is MANDATORY by all available means. Not "proportionately", not "within the framework of a manifestation of good will" (so that the one who said this disgusting thing would get it in the throat) But by all means. Stop joking.
    - Okay, I'll try.
    - Not! Don't try. Do it. Or don't. Don't try.
    1. +1
      3 October 2022 19: 16
      Why be modest. Let the Australopithecus know that all Anglo-Saxons will fly.
  21. +3
    3 October 2022 17: 26
    If such an action happens, no one will understand. No need for illusions. The culprit has already been identified, perhaps the protocols of international commissions have already been printed and signed, except for the date .... You are to blame for the fact that I want to eat! am The weak are always beaten. crying
  22. 0
    3 October 2022 17: 33
    The author pumps up ...... Everything that is good has already been achieved without any nuclear explosions. After all, in the end, the West will populate the territory, why do they need radiation? Moreover, it is difficult to predict the direction of the wind even three days after the action.
    And why did the IAEA commissioner come to Za NPP? He checked stocks of uranium and plutonium. Is everything in place. They also control the CheAES.

    The general impression is that the participants in the conflict are controlled from a single center, which reports to each side even the results of hostilities. After all, we are given accurate data on the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine during the strikes of Russian missiles. Where is the information from?
    I guess "everything is taken into account by a mighty hurricane" ....
  23. 0
    3 October 2022 17: 43
    "a sharp outburst of emotions from the United States, Ukraine and the West as a whole on the topic of the likely imminent use of nuclear weapons by Russia. Against the" independent ", of course."
    ------
    Does the author smoke?
    -------
    Naturally, this is to urinate after beer ...
    No need to exaggerate ... Freeze, freeze, wolf tail (c)
    By the way, it will be cool to see friends and classmates who left in the 90s with arrogant and proud faces, who will return from Germany to Russia in February 2023 and say: "we are Russian Germans" wassat "Our grandparents are buried in the cemetery here" laughing
    And we will accept them as prodigal sons, but we will add: "I-I will give East Fontaistish" (c)
  24. +4
    3 October 2022 18: 18
    Something somehow synchronously clowns got out. anxious
    1. 0
      3 October 2022 20: 24
      An engineer, I gave you a plus, but in essence people are asking and begging for a can, they say please. It is not right
      Please don't speak. I have to say: You’re fucked up, your economy and the economy of the small-shaven ones are in trouble (the pension fund of the UK collapsed, almost began to print an unsecured pound,) ... to your health bully Whistle in Tui
  25. +1
    3 October 2022 18: 28
    Well, this will indeed be the last provocation. The latter is primarily for the authors, because then only the very same "we will definitely bang" ...
  26. 0
    3 October 2022 19: 42
    Now E. Satanovsky spoke, so with the interlocutor, among other things, they discussed a very similar scenario.
  27. 0
    3 October 2022 21: 16
    The best answer would be the real power of conventional weapons. And the ability to modernize production.
  28. +1
    3 October 2022 21: 35
    The author cannot offer a plan of salvation, but he would be grateful to someone who offers one.

    Haloperidol orally or intramuscularly.
  29. 0
    3 October 2022 21: 40
    The horror story invented by the author and that’s it, it started ... in the comments, in all seriousness, they began to discuss and assume, advise and threaten ... winked
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. -1
    3 October 2022 23: 37
    Ce matin même j'aiécris à un collègue que c'était le scénario que je voyais se profiler...
    Avec une nuance, surtout après les declarations de l'ex general Petraeus.
    1 explosion d'une charge nucléaire présentée comme une attaque nucléaire Russe en Ukraine
    2 bombardement des intérêts Russes ( c'est ce qu' a déjà déclaré Petraeus) par les USA & co
    3 tres probable replique de la Russie
    4 ...bien venu dans l'Armageddon de l'hémisphère nord :-(

    I wrote to a colleague this morning that this was the scenario that I saw looming...
    With one nuance, especially after the statements of the former General Petraeus.
    1 nuclear explosion presented as a Russian nuclear attack in Ukraine
    2 bombardment of Russian interests (as already stated by Petraeus) by the United States and
    3 very likely Russian response
    4 ... well, Armageddon has arrived in the northern hemisphere :-(
  32. +1
    4 October 2022 09: 15
    Quote: Nikolai Malyugin
    Everyone has forgotten the simple truth - In order not to be afraid yourself, do not threaten anyone. Everything turns out, as an impressionable woman herself thinks up, she cries or laughs. There are too many predators. And in nature there is a rule that when there are more predators than peaceful animals, they simply die out.

    Just because you're a vegetarian doesn't mean they don't want to eat you.
  33. 0
    4 October 2022 14: 31
    Quote: Victor Leningradets
    I wrote again.
    For a nuclear strike on Ukraine, three Boreas are needed, which should covertly go out and freeze in low noise mode in the ocean.
    Then one of the Boreys is supposed to discharge maces with 100 kt warheads on bridges, tunnels, turbine rooms of power plants and other critical infrastructure of Ukraine. It is advisable to do this from the near Atlantic for the United States.
    The explosion of charges of 100 kt can be carried out at a considerable height, while the shock wave will bring down the bridge or the roof of the turbine hall, and the radioactive contamination of the area will be minimal. All US attempts to respond will be blocked by the uncertainty of the positions of two more Boreas.
    Using the surprise of the strike, our airborne troops, with the support of the Air Force, skillfully using tactical weapons against the surviving fragments of air defense and local defense centers, must take key positions for the advancement of our ground forces, which, having deployed, will make a final cleansing of enemy troops.
    This will save tens of thousands of Russians and millions of Russians, too, but mistakenly considered Ukrainian, lives compared to a long positional war of extermination.

    Did you read the article? It describes a possible scenario for simulating a nuclear strike.
    1. 0
      4 October 2022 20: 13
      And I wrote what needs to be done in the current situation.
      Margarita Simonyan and I (that's a woman!) independently came to the conclusion that we have neither a mobilization resource nor the former military-industrial complex. So - the last trump card.
      Only it must be used minimizing casualties among the civilian population and with maximum effect in order to go on a decisive offensive in order to completely defeat the enemy. In addition, it is necessary to create a zugzwang for the partners of Vladimir Putin and Sergey Lavrov. Therefore, there are three Boreas, therefore, powerful charges with high-altitude detonation, two per target, therefore, after the use of nuclear weapons on bridges, turbine halls of thermal power plants, infrastructure facilities, a decisive transition to the offensive to minimize casualties on both sides.
      I hope that more sophisticated and decisive plans are being worked out in the General Staff.
      1. 0
        4 October 2022 21: 07
        . If you allow yourself to use nuclear weapons, then you can come up with many plans for victory over Ukraine. One is more beautiful than the other. If this is the approach, then why touch the Boreas - these things are very expensive. It is quite enough to strike nuclear weapons from the Tu-95. A budget option.
        1. 0
          4 October 2022 21: 12
          And how does the TU-95 threaten the US? Where is the zugzwang?
          Petraeus (at the duduk on the tongue) has already promised an answer.
          But if not far from your shores, an enemy RKPSN fired back quite in combat, and somewhere nearby (or not nearby?) Two more ...
          In addition, it will be a real benefit from the trillions that seem to have been ditched on the SSYaSMB.
  34. +1
    4 October 2022 14: 32
    Quote: nickname7
    tactical nuclear weapons

    Man, how can you write about tactical nuclear weapons so easily?
    Do you even give a report on what nuclear weapons are? Or is it the provocateurs ran.
    Let me remind you that the war with nuclear weapons is the destruction of civilization.

    And how are you going to look into the eyes of the Azov people, they will also become citizens?! In addition, it is not necessary to hit the cities, as a deterrent weapon, in case of too arrogant behavior of NATO mercenaries, or do you propose to protect them as well?
  35. +2
    4 October 2022 15: 28
    Boniface, questions from a man. living thousands of kilometers from Russia; 1. When will the Kremlin stop lying to its people about Western "partners"? There are only enemies of Russia, led by the United States!
    2. When will they stop selling strategic materials to enemies, which are necessary for the production of weapons sent to the ukroreich?
    3. When will they stop supplying energy to the enemies of Russia and when will they stop the transit of natural gas through the territory of the Ukroreich to Russophobic Europe, which is fighting with the hands of Ukrainian Nazis and its mercenaries against Russia?
    One gets the impression that loud statements about increasing pressure on the Armed Forces of Ukraine are nothing more than blah blah blah for the domestic Russian audience! Everything is very similar to 1941 - the beginning of the Second World War.
    When will Russia start fighting? Or the Russian oligarchy has already agreed with its Western "partners" on the surrender of Russia and the whole world is watching the game of giveaway!
  36. 0
    4 October 2022 15: 34
    Quote: nickname7
    In general, the Russian Federation plans to overthrow the Kyiv regime and take the throne or power

    A lot has changed since the beginning of the SVO.
    Withdrawal of our troops from under

    Chernigov, Sumy, the Istanbul de-escalation of Roman Abramovich, says that the "Georgian option" has been chosen.
    And this was clear even before the end of the negotiations in Istanbul, because. the Turks returned their embassy to Kyiv.

    But this is wrong! One thing is dwarf Georgia, 70% of whose population lives in Moscow and the region, another thing is Ukroreich, who will bomb new regions until the ammunition runs out.
  37. 0
    4 October 2022 19: 09
    Quote: Dmitry Donyakin
    Let's say we burn nuclear weapons of the former Ukrainian SSR. What's next? And then there will be what the author drew. Blockade. Can we make carts? Where can we get horses? Shall we make a bough-harrow? No internet or other perks. Yes, as long as they do not need to undermine something. No matter how this wave of mobilized people plays the role of nuclear weapons. How they will rush, smashing Russia to smithereens. No Minin and Pozharsky. There are no citizens. There are no people. There is an elite and a population. Roar is worth it. Nobody wants to die for their country.

    There is a problem, if Minin and Pozharsky had gathered a militia for the war with Prussia, they would not have succeeded either, there is no need to commemorate noble people out of time. If you want anologies, then it's easier to compare with the Russian-Japanese and the First World War.
  38. 0
    4 October 2022 19: 17
    Quote: Tank jacket
    By the way, it will be cool to see friends and classmates who left in the 90s with arrogant and proud faces, who will return from Germany to Russia in February 2023

    You are the same fantastic, well, of course, someone can come, but to massively enter the country with 12000 wooden ones, yes, you are fantastic.
  39. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      4 October 2022 20: 18
      Where does undivided uranium or plutonium remain?
      The plasma cloud will spread it over tens to hundreds of kilometers and superimpose it on the Chernobyl background. This is not a mine test for you. There is no pure experience.
  40. +1
    4 October 2022 19: 22
    Quote: kakvastam
    An absolutely incorrect assessment of the position before the start of the operation showed this well.

    Well, yes, but before it was not visible? "While I am president, there will be no pension reform" and ....? And how do you like the doubling of GDP, but so much has been said and not done there that the West is well aware that a person who has decided to do something will not talk about it in advance, as they say "speak gop until he jumped over.
  41. 0
    5 October 2022 22: 26
    Most likely, the US is creating a propaganda cover for its provocation - the standard for this gang of marauders.
  42. 0
    7 October 2022 06: 07
    "Russian nuclear strike"

    If there is such a provocation from the Anglo-Saxons by the hands of the Ukronazis, then there should immediately be an answer in London, in Pshekia ...
  43. 0
    9 October 2022 21: 12
    It’s not fame that is always scary, namely. Offering all Russians to move to the Far East or Siberia from the Baltic states. Offering the time of the move and all sorts of preferential conditions there with justification for their oppression in the Baltic countries. Such an approach will not be understood. Let Russophobes scratch their turnips.