Medvedev spoke about the possibility of using nuclear weapons in Ukraine

54
Medvedev spoke about the possibility of using nuclear weapons in Ukraine

The Russian Federation has the full right to use nuclear weapons in the event of a threat to their existence. Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, wrote about this on his Telegram channel.

As the deputy chairman of the Security Council noted, now Western leaders, including US President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Liz Truss, are demanding that the Russian Federation "take its hand off its" nuclear button "". Otherwise, the West threatens with some "terrifying" consequences.



However, Russia has a legal right to use nuclear weapons in two cases: either if Russia or its allies are attacked with nuclear weapons, or if the existence of the state is threatened by conventional aggression.

Medvedev also stressed that Russia will do everything possible to ensure that nuclear weapons do not appear in such an aggressive state as Ukraine. He noted that today Ukraine is directly controlled by NATO countries. But since one cannot count on the adequacy of the Ukrainian authorities, the only hope is for “common sense and a sense of self-preservation” among those Western countries that still patronize Ukraine.

Medvedev then moves on to a very interesting question. Recently, the Western and Ukrainian press have been actively discussing the hypothetical possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine by the Russian armed forces. Retired General Ben Hodges, who once commanded NATO troops, has already threatened in this case to use strikes on the bases of the Black Sea fleet in Crimea.

However, Medvedev believes that even with the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine, the West will not dare to directly intervene in the conflict. After all, it threatens his own safety, habitual comfort and way of life.

After all, the security of Washington, London, Brussels is much more important for the North Atlantic Alliance than the fate of the dying Ukraine that no one needs, even if it is abundantly supplied with various weapons.

- wrote Medvedev.

According to the deputy chairman of the Security Council, the current supply of Western weapons to Ukraine is nothing more than a business, albeit based on hatred for the Russian state. However, "European demagogues" will not want to die in a nuclear apocalypse, Medvedev believes. Consequently, they will "swallow the use of any weapon" in the current conflict.

Medvedev writes that a good scenario for the development of events would be at least a partial awareness of this circumstance by the Ukrainian authorities. But this, the politician emphasizes, is unrealistic. After all, the Ukrainian leaders, as Medvedev writes, are in "a constant military frenzy with short pauses for bizarre drug dreams."

There is no doubt that Medvedev's Telegram post is already being analyzed and cited by Western and Ukrainian journalists. Naturally, they will draw a conclusion from it about the possible use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia in Ukraine, and they will be wrong. As long as there is no real threat to the existence of the Russian state itself, Moscow will not use nuclear weapons.

The Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation only warns Ukraine and its patrons and sponsors in the face of the “collective West” that Moscow will not stand on ceremony in the changed situation. You can defend your country and its people by any means. This is exactly what Dmitry Medvedev is trying to convey to the viceroys of the West sitting in Kyiv.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    27 September 2022
    The strategist, however... laughing
    1. -3
      27 September 2022
      Who is for the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine, put a plus ...
      1. -3
        27 September 2022
        I added a plus. I don't like being anonymous or an onanist.
      2. -1
        27 September 2022
        Quote: 76SSSR
        Who is for the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine, put a plus ...

        Press the red button! fellow
      3. +6
        27 September 2022
        Quote: 76SSSR
        Who is for the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine, put a plus ...

        My "+" is there.
        It is impossible to answer this question unambiguously. To deny the use of tactical nuclear weapons in changing conditions is thoughtless.
        If a country, choosing between war and shame, chooses shame, it gets both war and shame

        You can’t call NWO military operations against mercenaries and weapons from NATO. And after the order (order, decree) on partial mobilization, it will look unreasonable.
        During the Cuban Missile Crisis, Fidel Castro told the NSH that he was ready to sacrifice the Cuban people in order to defeat US imperialism.
        Today, any weaknesses, oversights, omissions are perceived ONLY as a WEAKNESS OF RUSSIA AND ITS LEADERSHIP.
        The very impression is that the country's leadership is clinging to any opportunity to get away from the forceful solution of the conflict. Most talkers (who consider language work to be a panacea for troubles) now and then start talking about some kind of negotiations, about some kind of “if anything” answer, about continuing to provide assistance to the Nazis who were not killed in 1945 ...
        And what are we afraid of? 27 Soviet people were not afraid and accepted death for the sake of THAT NOT A SINGLE FASCIST EVIDENCE could no longer raise its head.
        We could not stop the collapse of the USSR. Our fault, our weakness, our lack of will, our indifference, our "the Bolsheviks will manage without me." First of all, one should voice (to each) what he wants in the end, and not beat himself in the chest with a hoof ...
        If tactical nuclear weapons will contribute to the defeat of the Nazi authorities in Ukraine, and if circumstances so require. no need to wait...
        The results of weakness and inability to mobilize forces (even to rally the people around a national idea) are already visible both in the terrorist attacks on the joint venture and in the activation of the Ukrainian DRGs.
        And remember, our brothers are with us in the same trenches. There are enemies against us who want our death...
    2. AUL
      +8
      27 September 2022
      The Russian Federation has the full right to use nuclear weapons in the event of a threat to its existence.
      That is, they went to liberate Ukraine from the Nazis, demilitarize and denazify, but received a threat to their existence?
      1. -6
        27 September 2022
        Are you so afraid for yourself that you are ready to give up?
        1. AUL
          0
          27 September 2022
          Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
          Are you so afraid for yourself that you are ready to give up?

          Inferences made in the complete absence of information for them are a phenomenon in the same category as laughter for no reason! (C) Confucius
          1. -3
            27 September 2022
            To me your Confucius that walked, that he rode ... Tell me your opinion. Everyone is ready to hide behind Confucius.
            1. AUL
              0
              27 September 2022
              Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
              To me, your Confucius that walked, that he rode ...

              1. Confucius is not mine - he is Chinese. But at the same time he was a very intelligent man!
              2.
              You tell your opinion.
              So I said it. Didn't you notice? For some reason, you decided that I was "so afraid for myself that I was ready to give up." I didn’t say anything close to that, but why did you draw such a conclusion? Just "throw dirt - at least something will stick"? This receiver is for fools and for fools. So to me it's purely purple.
              3.
              Everyone is ready to hide behind Confucius.
              It won't work anymore - he recently died. Such an annoyance! wassat
              1. -2
                27 September 2022
                Yes, I know who Confucius is, I even began to read his fabrications. But I didn't like it. Is it possible? Well, what I didn’t like ... Or should I bow before what was written 2500 years ago? Or in the back?
                Now, about your opinion - I'm glad if you're not afraid, really glad. Sorry if that, I ran into the wrong one. It happens to me. Are you really ready to give up? Or ready to negotiate?
                1. AUL
                  +1
                  27 September 2022
                  Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
                  Are you really ready to give up? Or ready to negotiate?

                  Not serious at all...
                  1. -2
                    27 September 2022
                    It happens. Now tell me how do you manage to bypass the restriction on short messages? I retyped you and was told the message was too short. I'm at a dead end.
                    1. AUL
                      0
                      27 September 2022
                      I have no idea! Probably, the length of the quote is also taken into account.
      2. +1
        27 September 2022
        They went to denazify Ukraine precisely because they realized the growing threat to their existence (due to the inclusion of Ukraine in the sphere of influence of NATO and the United States).
        1. AUL
          +1
          27 September 2022
          So, next in line are the Balts, Scandinavians and Poles?
          1. 0
            28 September 2022
            Balts - for sure. Poles in question. They can still have time to change the government to "Varshavyanka" (song).
    3. +1
      27 September 2022
      Chatterbox, however, who kissed Sarkozy and did not take Tbilisi. Stopped 60 km away.
      1. 0
        27 September 2022
        The iPhone cannot have its own thoughts, it only voices others. wassat Referents were selected for the future president (?) what
  2. +4
    27 September 2022
    Suspicions are growing that the Anglo-Saxons are preparing a provocation with nuclear weapons ...
    1. +2
      27 September 2022
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      Suspicions are growing that the Anglo-Saxons are preparing a provocation with nuclear weapons ...

      Easily! they have all the media in the world.
      1. 0
        27 September 2022
        for $ 100 there are also witnesses who have been at the epicenter of a nuclear explosion.
  3. ban
    +5
    27 September 2022
    Why retell?
    The original is much better:

    More about the use of nuclear weapons

    Our enemies love to make grandiloquent statements. Operate with the terms "freedom", "democracy", "mission". In fact, this is just ritual verbal diarrhea. Fountains of diarrheal demagogy, coupled with vicious croaking rhetoric, have become a long-proven weapon of the Anglo-Saxon world, with which they flood the rest of humanity in an attempt to defend their exclusivity and the right to rule the world.

    The topic of recent days is the Russian nuclear threat.
    Biden and Truss, various secondary blinkins and sullivans, spraying Atlantic saliva, demand that Russia remove its hand from its “nuclear button”. Together, they constantly threaten us with “terrifying” consequences if Russia uses nuclear weapons. And the London aunt, young in mind, is completely ready to immediately begin an exchange of nuclear strikes with our country.

    I have to remind you again - for those deaf who hear only themselves. Russia has the right to use nuclear weapons if necessary. in predetermined cases. In strict accordance with the Fundamentals of State Policy in the Field of Nuclear Deterrence. If we or our allies are attacked using this type of weapon. Or if aggression with the use of conventional weapons threatens the very existence of our state. The President of Russia spoke about this directly recently.

    In addition, we will do everything to prevent the appearance of nuclear weapons in our hostile neighbors. For example, in Nazi Ukraine, which is directly controlled today by NATO countries.
    It is pointless to count on the reason and political will of the Kyiv regime. But there is still a fragile hope for common sense and a sense of self-preservation of the enemy countries condoning them. They understand that if the threat to Russia exceeds the established danger limit, we will have to respond.
    Without asking anyone's permission, without long consultations. And it's definitely not a bluff.

    The question is different. Imagine that Russia is forced to use the most formidable weapon against the Ukrainian regime, which has committed a large-scale act of aggression that is dangerous for the very existence of our state. I believe that NATO will not directly intervene in the conflict even in this situation. After all, the security of Washington, London, and Brussels is much more important for the North Atlantic Alliance than the fate of the perishing Ukraine, which no one needs, even if it is abundantly supplied with various weapons. The supply of modern weapons is just a business for Western countries, however, heavily implicated in hatred towards us. No more. Overseas and European demagogues are not going to perish in a nuclear apocalypse. Therefore, they will swallow the use of any weapon in the current conflict. Something like this…

    It would be nice if this sad conclusion was at least partially realized by the authorities in Kyiv. Alas, this is almost impossible. They are in constant war frenzy with short pauses for bizarre drug dreams.


    https://t.me/medvedev_telegram/181
  4. +1
    27 September 2022
    I am against the use of nuclear weapons, but in order to save the lives of our citizens, it is possible to slap western Ukraine, but closer to the border with Poland, and if the West starts to drive heavy equipment and manpower ... Such realities ....
  5. 0
    27 September 2022
    that in the changed situation Moscow will not stand on ceremony.

    In Ukraine, at least smash the refineries, oil and gas pipelines, the energy system, you are our "arrogant" one. The West will not be able to supply the "square" with fuel and electricity, even if there are green wrappers - here a real product is needed, but it is not in stock. Unlike the weapons they send. Cut the arteries - the beast will bleed to death. It buckles and falls off.
  6. 0
    27 September 2022
    Why nuclear weapons? There is also a thermobar. Iron "acceptance centers" and military facilities, as well as strategic facilities.
    1. +1
      27 September 2022
      Quote from Alex
      Why nuclear weapons? There is also a thermobar.

      If you don't use it, then it doesn't exist.
      Why was the high-yield aviation vacuum bomb (AVBPM) not used in Ukraine?

      All talk about the presence of weapons "analogous to the world" must be ended. The enemy must be able to get to know him practically.
  7. +1
    27 September 2022
    In the west, hysteria ...., so the malitsa poured manenko on the fire ...., they will have epilepsy .... with a fright ...., but it was not necessary to first poke a stick into the lair, and then lower the mongrel on a bear ... who will then disassemble them there, who just barked, and who bit ....
    1. +3
      27 September 2022
      Quote from uprun
      In the west, hysteria ...., so the little one poured manenko into the fire ...., they will have epilepsy .... out of fright ....

      A couple more such threats, without real action, and the West will grin. It's not that I'm for the use of this extreme measure, but I'll frighten in vain - my reputation will come out sideways. We have already gone through the notorious "attacks on decision-making centers" ...
    2. +1
      27 September 2022
      Quote from uprun
      Hysteria in the West...

      Do they have any hysterics? Why would? Zelensky fled from Ukraine? APU threw a white flag? From NATO began to leave one after another country?
      Squealing, noise, public statements are for the weak. Americans didn't fight on the ground after the Vietnam War. Computer games and video shooters are over. Dirty, routine combat work does not tolerate publicity.
  8. +4
    27 September 2022
    The only target for which the use of nuclear weapons is justified is the United States. To use it in Europe is to spoil ourselves.
    1. +1
      27 September 2022
      Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
      The only target for which the use of nuclear weapons is justified is the United States.

      Why did it happen? What about GB?
      From the point of view of military strategy, any isolated island is a good target for nuclear weapons with minimal consequences for the continent.
      1. 0
        27 September 2022
        GB has long been in the role of a US slave. Not the same effect.
  9. +1
    27 September 2022
    Oh, this is the one who promised at the decision-making centers you can not read
  10. +3
    27 September 2022
    Here is a video Guys take care of yourself, a video about mobilization, buy everything for yourself, and many take loans, who micro loans Because the 2nd Army in the world cannot provide mats for me, and then there are push-button phones, so as not to show all mess to say the least
  11. +3
    27 September 2022
    LADIES as he says, so he will say.
    One thing is incomprehensible - these regular "colorful in turns" speeches of WAM are: 6. Self-promotion, with the goal of becoming president in tandem again by 1 and winning back the shame of the words "no money, but you hold on"? 24. Either this is an "justification" for the uselessness of the post of deputy. Chairman of the Security Council or the uselessness of this person in this post? It seems that Peskov is enough to listen to the same thing in parallel? 2 . Or is it such a thing - a strong move "in some places" to pump up an empty information space when the official government is silent?
    1. 0
      27 September 2022
      Yes, self-promotion, dimon president laughing he will still give the territory of the Russian Federation, before that, only Norway gave the sea territory
    2. +3
      27 September 2022
      At the same time, something is in no hurry to send his son to the NWO zone ...
  12. 0
    27 September 2022
    If nuclear weapons exist, then sooner or later (rather sooner) they will be used and then the process will not be controllable. If nuclear weapons are used in Ukraine, then it is necessary to answer on the territory of Britain and the United States.
  13. -1
    27 September 2022
    Tactical nuclear weapons are another option on the battlefield in the event of an invasion of Russia or the transfer of NATO troops and advanced weapons to Ukraine.
    1. 0
      27 September 2022
      The use of tactical nuclear weapons will only delay the retaliatory strike. Nuclear weapons are the last argument for the losing side.
  14. 0
    27 September 2022
    The West and the United States with the Ukrainians in their illusions and lies are mired up to their ears and no longer distinguish where the reality is .. and where the lies are. So Putin’s words about nuclear weapons were completely distorted and turned upside down and they themselves believed in their lies. Russia will never use nuclear weapons on its territory ... and the territory of the former Ukraine is Russian territory, therefore Russia will not spoil where it lives .... therefore, all Europeans from NATO and the USA need to worry about the use of nuclear weapons in relation to the territory of the former Ukraine. ..and its territory as an enemy of Russia.
    1. 0
      27 September 2022
      Quote: Skipper
      So Putin’s words about nuclear weapons were completely distorted and turned upside down and they themselves believed in their lies.

      No need to be surprised. It was amazing ten years ago. They generate information and meanings. Only their defeat will change the situation.
  15. -1
    27 September 2022
    The only bad thing is that the very concept of "threat to the existence of the state" is not defined. This is what should happen - the army is defeated, the population in Moscow is killed, the use of bacteorological weapons against us with mass casualties ???
    1. -2
      27 September 2022
      Quote: asher
      the very concept of "threat to the existence of the state" is not defined

      The decision is made by the Supreme Commander. Its' his job.
    2. -2
      27 September 2022
      Only one person knows this - he will decide everything.
  16. +1
    27 September 2022
    or if there is a threat to the existence of the state as a result of aggression using conventional weapons

    Blurred shape, twist, stretch as you like, like flexible red lines
  17. +1
    27 September 2022
    Quote from Medvedev:
    "After all, the security of Washington, London, Brussels is much more important for the North Atlantic Alliance than the fate of a dying Ukraine that no one needs, even if it is abundantly supplied with various weapons"
    ----
    Translated into simple language: "stop supplying Ukraine with weapons,
    otherwise we will start a nuclear war."
    Indirectly, this is a recognition that the conventional war
    Russia does not pull and therefore threatens nuclear weapons.
  18. -2
    27 September 2022
    Apparently, DAM is preparing to become president in 2024. Well, that's a good option. In 2008, he hit the Georgians so hard that they still hiccup with fear.
  19. +1
    27 September 2022
    Everyone wants to try on the “crown” of Zhirinovsky: to be cruel and ... irresponsible.
  20. -1
    27 September 2022
    Quote: iouris
    The use of tactical nuclear weapons will only delay the retaliatory strike. Nuclear weapons are the last argument for the losing side.


    As you wish. The USA blew Hiroshima because they were losing to Japan .. laughing
  21. 0
    27 September 2022
    Quote: yuriy55
    The enemy must be able to get to know him practically.

    Absolutely agree with you. And to trump the possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons is such a thing. Dmitry Anatolyevich, when he was President, apparently, was not explained that nuclear weapons, in fact, are not a weapon, but a deterrent that ensures parity in an unresolvable conflict. And the use of tactical nuclear weapons is actually a prelude to the end of the world.
  22. 0
    27 September 2022
    For all the militants, a film was made a long time ago:



    Enjoy watching...
  23. 0
    July 18 2023
    Medvedev can threaten, but in reality ...
    _________________________________________

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"