The Ministry of Defense does not exclude the adoption of the compact Lebedev pistol (PLC)

66
The Ministry of Defense does not exclude the adoption of the compact Lebedev pistol (PLC)

The compact Lebedev pistol (PLC) can be adopted by the Russian army, the Ministry of Defense is considering this issue, but a final decision has not yet been made. Alan Lushnikov, president of the Kalashnikov concern, spoke about this.

The Russian military is considering the Lebedev pistol in the "compact" version as a personal weapons for some special forces, but the decision to adopt this pistol into service has not yet been made. But the PLC was adopted by two other law enforcement agencies - the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the National Guard. And here and there, the PLC should replace the Makarov pistol (PM). Currently, contracts are being prepared for the supply of weapons to law enforcement officers, the concern is ready for serial deliveries of the pistol in the required volumes.



After the signing of supply contracts, it is planned to begin deliveries of these products to both departments. (...) The Russian Ministry of Defense is considering the possibility of adopting a compact Lebedev pistol

приводит RIA News Lushnikov's words.

The fact that the Ministry of Defense considers the PLC as a personal weapon for special forces was reported last year, but the military has a large selection. Recently, Russian gunsmiths have created several pistols for various cartridges, ranging from 9X19 mm to 9X21 mm, so the military is in no hurry.

The compact Lebedev pistol was designed for the 9X19 mm Parabellum cartridge. Type of automation - recoil of the bolt, coupled with the barrel with a short stroke of the barrel, locking by skewed barrel. Magazine capacity 14 rounds, weight without cartridges - 720 grams. The location of the slide delay, the magazine reset button and the fuse on both sides allows the gun to be used by both right-handed and left-handed people. There is a Picattini rail for attaching various accessories.
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    19 September 2022 12: 47
    Corner design, compact, but you can’t put it in your pocket, it will quickly make holes without shots. Is it difficult to get it out of your pocket too or is the compact one not for pockets? "From childhood I did not like the oval, I drew an angle from childhood" these verses by P. Kogan were put at the forefront by the designer of this pistol.
    1. KCA
      0
      19 September 2022 13: 03
      APS won’t fit into your pocket at all, but many specialists love it very much and are not going to change it, and not only in Russia
      1. 0
        19 September 2022 13: 08
        APS won’t fit into your pocket at all, but many specialists love it very much and are not going to change it, and not only in Russia

        APS is not called compact.
      2. +2
        19 September 2022 18: 02
        APS won’t fit into your pocket at all, but many specialists love it very much and are not going to change it

        wassat here strictly according to Freud - wearing APS compensates for the lack of size elsewhere ... There are no other reasons to "love" him ...
        1. KCA
          -4
          19 September 2022 18: 09
          I have a comrade FSO officer, he liked to shoot, he worked in the same shooting range with Alpha, you hold your tongue, good friend, but who worked with him in the shooting gallery ...
    2. +4
      19 September 2022 13: 04
      Why is PM bad for the army? Light weight, compact, reliable. Arguments that lack of accuracy past. We need to train skills and not three rounds a quarter. No one goes on the attack with him. Crushing bulletproof vests is also not required from him. Weapon of last chance. Specialists need special tools, I agree.
      1. +1
        19 September 2022 13: 14
        Why is PM bad for the army?

        It’s even more convenient for them to open beer and hammer nails into the wall. By the way, the weight is the same with this "compact". And who said that this PLC is more accurate than the PM, why with the same cartridge and barrel length?
        1. +2
          19 September 2022 15: 36
          I will add about the PLC, a very difficult disassembly, respectively, problems with cleaning. And if we take into account in combat conditions there are no tables for cleaning weapons, then here the PLC loses the PM completely. Another cartridge that will cause the separation of this ammunition in the troops for many years. In my opinion, it may work for the Ministry of Internal Affairs, but not for the army. I understand the designer, he needs to create something new.
        2. +1
          19 September 2022 16: 18
          And who said that this PLC is more accurate than PM, why with the same cartridge

          Actually, they have different cartridges - Lebedev has 9X19 mm Parabellum, and PM has 9X18 mm PM
          1. -5
            19 September 2022 16: 25
            Actually, they have different cartridges - Lebedev has 9X19 mm Parabellum, and PM has 9X18 mm PM

            Well, then you don’t need this pistol chambered for an imported cartridge at all. The Kalashnikov Concern wanted to make money on exports, it seems that they showed him the barrel in the barrel, so they rushed back to their native roots ...
      2. +3
        19 September 2022 15: 00
        Quote from Voronezh
        Why is PM bad for the army?
        For the Army, the enemy is meant in body armor, where a pistol chambered for 9x18 has nothing to do. In the Army, the Udav pistol chambered for 9x21 is in service - that's where it belongs. And why they also needed a compact one - I'll never know.
        1. -5
          19 September 2022 16: 19
          And why they also needed a compact one - I'll never know.

          That's just the point - initially for the Moscow Region, a Lebedev pistol with a 9x21 cartridge, and with a 9x19 cartridge for the Ministry of Internal Affairs. But the Ministry of Internal Affairs doesn’t need this PLC, they have enough reliable PM. So they want to get into the army, but there senior officers and generals already have a pocket toy, PSM, lightweight, for concealed carry.
          1. 0
            20 September 2022 13: 11
            Have you seen PSM from anyone in real life?
            1. 0
              20 September 2022 14: 05
              Have you seen PSM from anyone in real life?

              He even shot, his brother worked as an opera, they were armed at one time, it is very convenient to carry in your pocket.
            2. 0
              20 September 2022 16: 52
              At least 2 people.
              Colonel Zavyalov, head of the service of the special forces troops ... From 25 meters he put the entire store in a pack of cigarettes ...
              Well, one more thing, a retired colonel, I won’t give his last name, he has an award.
        2. -1
          20 September 2022 13: 08
          [/ quote] In the Army, the "Boa constrictor" pistol is in service [quote]

          Bullshit, he is not in the army. Maybe only inside the Moscow Ring Road ...
          1. 0
            20 September 2022 16: 31
            Quote from Voronezh
            Bullshit, he is not in the army.
            Adopted and purchased for the Army, it does not mean at all that everyone already has it there. Write:
            According to the plan, which Izvestia got acquainted with, almost 400 million rubles were allocated for the purchase of the first large batch of several tens of thousands of "trunks". "Boas" will go mainly into service with special forces and intelligence units. Ordinary military personnel will also receive a novelty ...............
            https://iz.ru/1167945/anton-lavrov-anna-cherepanova/udav-bolshoi-minoborony-nachalo-massovuiu-zakupku-noveishego-pistoleta
    3. +3
      19 September 2022 13: 21
      In vain write like that, everyone who has come across this product notes a comfortable grip and lightness in the truest sense of the word. Due to the geometry of the frame and the "depth" of the grip, the recoil and the toss of the barrel are extremely comfortable. Convenient descent, no effect of "waiting for a shot" hence the accuracy from the first shot, a capacious magazine, a sufficient stopping effect of the cartridge. Dmitry Lebedev is today a recognized authority in the development of short-barreled weapons, his developments are the most advanced. For the Ministry of Internal Affairs, it makes no sense to change to shoot at the gopniks, but for the army it is quite a worthy replacement for the PM. By the way, at the expense of the aiming range of the exact defeat of a full-height target in tests of 80 meters, it’s not very bad.
      1. +4
        19 September 2022 13: 47
        Good accuracy, the magazine is increased by 5 rounds, which means a lot. Made in 2017. MO thinks for a long time. Someone in sight "something" wants.
      2. -3
        19 September 2022 14: 07
        no effect of "waiting for a shot"

        For such a weapon, this is not good. And the PM can be modified to trigger from touch, no one has canceled the TB, pay attention to where the finger is placed on the PLC and PM, on the PM on the trigger, and on the frame on the PLC, why? It will be more convenient to fight with a pistol in your hand and detain a criminal with a PM, because this PLC is intended primarily for the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The descent of the PM does not cause any inconvenience to me, you just need to learn how to hold the PM tightly while relaxing the index one, how to control the finger separately from the hand.
      3. +1
        19 September 2022 18: 06
        Quote from Silver99
        For the Ministry of Internal Affairs, it makes no sense to change to shoot at the gopniks, but for the army it is quite a worthy replacement for the PM.

        wassat And in the army, who to shoot with a pistol? - I see no targets for this weapon! Do not miss yourself in the forehead and from the PMA ...
      4. 0
        19 September 2022 20: 15
        Quote from Silver99
        but for the army it is quite a worthy replacement for PM. By the way, at the expense of the aiming range of the exact defeat of a full-height target in tests of 80 meters, it’s not very bad.
        In war, at a distance of 80-100 meters, the "target" will be "full-length" until the first shot - then the "target" will become "chest" and will be fired from AK or M-4.
        In the army pistol in combat they are used as a last resort - the actual use of fire from a pistol on the enemy - for example, a battle in a closed urban area - such as "a room in an apartment".
        1. 0
          20 September 2022 13: 14
          As they said in one famous movie, a personal weapon is given to an officer to solve personal problems.
  2. +1
    19 September 2022 13: 03
    Dreams, dreams of effective managers wink The train has left, citizens - there is no money and will not be in the near future, calm down.

    PM will outlive everyone.
  3. -1
    19 September 2022 13: 03
    And why didn’t the PM please you ..... a good car ...., without refusal ...., there are still flattering reviews about the TT ....
  4. +2
    19 September 2022 13: 10
    You don’t need a pistol, but a cartridge of 5,56 * 25 mm, the cartridge case from TT is recompressed for a bullet from .223rem, it is shorter than our 5.45 from AK-74
    1. 0
      19 September 2022 18: 10
      Quote: air wolf
      You don't need a gun, but a 5,56 * 25 mm cartridge

      why? why is such a cartridge better than the standard 5.45x39? what kind of tasks can he perform that AK and PM cannot?
      1. 0
        20 September 2022 11: 19
        The speed will be initial 700 m / s and the issue with bulletproof vests is removed and injuries are not commensurate with life ...
        1. 0
          20 September 2022 12: 31
          what even I didn’t understand, are you going to fight with pistols or what? -- big mistake! It seems no, they didn’t, judging by the initial statement ...
          :) The AK-74 has an initial speed of 900 m / s in general - why change it to a weakened version?
          Mysteries in the dark...
    2. 0
      19 September 2022 20: 18
      Such a weapon requires an effective stopping action, 5,56 is not enough for this ...
      1. 0
        24 September 2022 09: 02
        Are you a hunter or weapon expert? I am a Hunter 25 years plus 10 years of service and I have 2 smooth and 3 rifled ones, the most running 223rem everything falls from it up to 150 meters!
  5. +4
    19 September 2022 13: 13
    I welcome any weapon that sends enemies to the next world.
  6. -8
    19 September 2022 13: 15
    You can arm them with new PMCs, which are organized by Prigozhin.
    These people are accustomed to compact weapons in their pockets.
    They will be able to make surprise attacks on the APU.
    1. +2
      19 September 2022 16: 05
      They themselves will figure out what they need, they are not included in the RF Armed Forces.
      1. -4
        19 September 2022 17: 14
        They'll figure it out, no doubt.
        These are not children, but criminals with heavy articles. Killing them is not the first time.
        1. +2
          19 September 2022 20: 22
          Have you seen their personal files? They will figure out who can be trusted with weapons. Or do you think that "penalty boxers" can only be armed with shovels? On the other side, as far as I know, they think differently.
    2. +1
      19 September 2022 20: 18
      Quote: voyaka uh

      These people are accustomed to compact weapons in their pockets.
      They will be able to make surprise attacks on the APU.
      This description is suitable for saboteurs in civilian clothes operating in settlements controlled by the enemy.
      soldier
      1. +1
        20 September 2022 03: 33

        cat Rusich
        Yesterday, 20: 18
        NEW

        +1
        Quote: voyaka uh

        These people are accustomed to compact weapons in their pockets.
        They will be able to make surprise attacks on the APU.
        This description is suitable for saboteurs in civilian clothes operating in settlements controlled by the enemy.
        mykola-monya, a runner from the USSR / RF, as always, out of line. He has a different task - to pour slop on the Russian Federation, grab more matzah, and so that the owner does not kick it out into the street.
  7. -2
    19 September 2022 13: 24
    First of all, it is desirable to issue pistols to those for whom the machine gun is inconvenient. Especially if the hostilities are taking place abroad and the problem of illegal distribution does not arise. Pistols are desirable for the crews of combat vehicles, machine gunners, grenade launchers, mortars and others loaded with other weapons. I don’t know how it is now, but before it was a problem, either you are unarmed, or the machine gun interferes with you.
    1. +3
      19 September 2022 15: 22
      either you are unarmed, or the machine is in your way.

      The tank stalled. Do you consider armed a driver with a pistol against a fighter with a machine gun? Or a jumping pilot? With PM, I hit an elephant in the ass from five steps only the third time. Although with AK in a ski pole from 60 meters always.
      This despite the fact that cartridges, time and opportunities to learn were a wagon. The PM was carried in the breast pocket of the jumpsuit in addition to the machine gun. For what - FIG knows. Just "it was supposed to." Let it be better that the machine "interferes" than to stay with this fart.
      1. 0
        19 September 2022 16: 01
        It's kind of understandable. But is it better to put the tracks in place with a pistol or without a machine gun? That is, you, as a tanker, say that you don’t need a gun at all?
      2. +1
        19 September 2022 18: 16
        Quote: dauria
        With PM, I hit an elephant in the ass from five steps only the third time

        wassat Yes, you, my friend, are a poacher! Where is the Elephant Protection Society looking?!
        But in essence, I completely agree with you - to whom and where can AK interfere? There is more if it is an AK-74M (with a folding plastic butt) ...
        1. 0
          19 September 2022 19: 22
          It remains only to interview other tankers. Will they agree to part with pistols and switch exclusively to machine guns?
      3. 0
        23 September 2022 14: 04
        It's just that not everyone can shoot from the PM. My instructor from 20 meters puts 8 bullets in a circle about 3-5 cm in diameter. I'm from the same distance within 8-ki. But here the question of skill and "given - not given." I know people who from 300 meters from AK-74 put three bullets into the "top ten", and from PM from 10 meters they do not always hit the chest target.
    2. +3
      19 September 2022 15: 36
      to issue pistols to those for whom the machine gun is inconvenient.

      . The gun is needed in order to get to your machine gun, which did not have to be left anywhere.
      1. 0
        19 September 2022 15: 58
        Can a machine gunner or a grenade launcher also reach his machine gun?
        1. -3
          19 September 2022 17: 16
          The gun is useless.
          A compact PP with a butt can still help.
          1. +1
            19 September 2022 17: 20
            Are you going to carry a PP with you along with a machine gun, like a PC? "To the madness of the brave we sing a song!" (With).
            This PP for a machine gun is completely useless.
            1. 0
              19 September 2022 17: 30
              I had to do it.
              I wore a Belgian machine gun MAG - 11 kg, and three belts, torn into 4 pieces each, and on my back: a spare barrel and an M-16 carbine with two magazines. Like a spare weapon. The second number carried a lot of ribbons (some in boxes) and his M-16 rifle, and several magazines.
              It was part of the "company fire support group".
              1. 0
                19 September 2022 17: 38
                Such a practice is an exception to the rule, neither a machine gunner, nor a grenade launcher, nor anyone else, it makes sense to load with extra overall and weighty weapons. This is a burden, not a help.
              2. 0
                19 September 2022 19: 38
                So I wanted to add it. He also wore a PKT and a Kalashnikov assault rifle on his back. I just wore it from the barracks to the training ground and back.
              3. +2
                20 September 2022 03: 37

                voyaka uh (Alexey)
                Yesterday, 17: 30
                NEW

                +1
                I had to do this...
                At the same time, tell me again how you ran around the tank range DURING SHOOTING at night !!! from tankslaughing fool laughing and the shells flew over your head tightly with a bale! tongue you lie as you breathe, and the people are led to your blue, and wet mriya from under Zhmerinka. wassat tongue laughing
  8. 0
    19 September 2022 13: 35
    Quote from Silver99
    In vain write like that, everyone who has come across this product notes a comfortable grip and lightness in the truest sense of the word. Due to the geometry of the frame and the "depth" of the grip, the recoil and the toss of the barrel are extremely comfortable. Convenient descent, no effect of "waiting for a shot" hence the accuracy from the first shot, a capacious magazine, a sufficient stopping effect of the cartridge. Dmitry Lebedev is today a recognized authority in the development of short-barreled weapons, his developments are the most advanced. It makes no sense for the Ministry of Internal Affairs to change to shoot at the gopniks, but for the army it is a worthy replacement.

    Just armies - a new pestle is not needed from the word at all, they are not at war, this has long been an attribute. But in the Ministry of Internal Affairs - a necessary tool, often the only one available when it comes to lockdown. But the device under discussion - it won’t go to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, there the criminal bloc is engaged in catching criminals, which walks around the civilian world and constantly carries weapons secretly. It is hard and inconvenient for the body to carry an angular brick of the PLC weight and size indicators covertly. The existing PM, in terms of the combination of service qualities, satisfies both the needs of detectives and is suitable for public security services, i.e. who can walk openly with weapons in uniform in public places.
    So the PLC - cross out.
    1. 0
      19 September 2022 19: 36
      Glock, have you seen it? I suggest you familiarize yourself with its dimensions and geometry.
  9. +6
    19 September 2022 13: 38
    The conversation about replacing the PM went back when I started working, and this is almost 30 years ago
    1. +3
      19 September 2022 16: 12
      We have "a replacement for the PM pistol in the Army, akin to replacing the AN-2 aircraft in aviation!" fool There has been a lot of talk and for a very long time, but "things are still there!" hi negative
  10. +1
    19 September 2022 15: 52
    They took the "Boa constrictor" into service. Or not accepted? I don't understand anything anymore.
    1. 0
      19 September 2022 20: 30
      Quote: shpon123
      They took the "Boa constrictor" into service. Or not accepted? I don't understand anything anymore.
      Aunt Vika says...
      "AT 2018g passed state tests and recommended for adoption."
      "The Russian army is planning until 2024 purchase more 3000 pistols "Boa" ...
      By the way "Boa constrictor" = pistol Kozlova = PC(constructor I. Kozlov)
      hi
  11. 0
    19 September 2022 16: 10
    "... the concern is ready for serial deliveries of the pistol in the required volumes ..." Finally! good Have you waited?! drinks
  12. 0
    19 September 2022 20: 27
    Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
    Glock, have you seen it? I suggest you familiarize yourself with its dimensions and geometry.

    Yuzal for several years Glock-17, and the legendary 2nd generation. And what? winked
    1. 0
      19 September 2022 20: 42
      And how is its angularity better than the angularity of the PLC?
  13. JPD
    0
    19 September 2022 21: 51
    I wonder, gentlemen of the Forum users, in which army are the Glocks in service? And where is this army fighting or fought with them?
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. 0
    19 September 2022 23: 44
    Reminiscent of CZ 75D compact in appearance smile
    1. 0
      23 September 2022 13: 58
      This is a 40 caliber Steyr replica. Because of this, he has huge gaps between the shutter and the frame.
  16. -1
    20 September 2022 17: 50
    Why are all these people discussing the development of funds through the PLC by a great concern?! Who cares about the opinion of voters, especially the one expressed by ear to the neighbor?
    Frankly, no matter how much _modern_ menagers drank for the development / maintenance of the current military-industrial complex - for the future of the Russian Federation this is purely orthogonal. Current efficiency does not provide for optimality from the word at all - who will say "no" and throw a stone at the boss? And since so far the entire management rests on unknown people with implicit braces ... it's better to discuss gunpowder for hunting - everything is more practical.
  17. 0
    23 September 2022 13: 57
    I shot the other day from the PLC, nothing toy, tolerable. But why does he always wedge the 4th cartridge when equipping a store (any)? Why do store sponges cut fingers with terrible force? Just 100 shots and my thumb is cut all over. When shooting, be prepared that very often the cartridge case will fall not somewhere, but on you (indoors). The sights are like a glock, so when shooting at a "brick" (rectangular metal target) from a distance of 20 meters, you will not see the "brick", since it is completely hidden by the front sight. But it's nice to hold, the descent is very short and easy and production, as reported by all shooting clubs in the mailing list, is "temporarily stopped".