Lavrov: Iran does not intend to attack Israel with nuclear weapons

Iran will not attack Israel atomic weapons. This statement was made by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov at a meeting with Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin in Moscow.

In turn, Rivlin noted that "Russia is the only country that can stop Iran’s nuclear program without any sanctions or military intervention."

According to the press service of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Lavrov and Rivlin also exchanged views on the development of the situation in the Middle East and North Africa, and discussed the situation in the Palestinian-Israeli settlement.

"Sergei Lavrov stressed the importance of resuming substantive negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian National Authority on a generally recognized international legal basis and confirmed Russia's readiness, along with other members of the Middle East Quartet and interested parties, to provide this necessary assistance," the ministry said.

During the meeting, a number of other global and regional issues were touched upon, including the topic of countering terrorism and the prospects for creating a zone free of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East.

Lavrov and Rivlin reaffirmed their common interest in building up an active political dialogue, expanding the multifaceted interaction between the two countries, including through parliamentary lines.

Comments

[Chemist]

How the Western Zionist extras clung to the East, everywhere they spoil both the end and the edge of this indecency.
Need a powerful counterweight to this party.

[Sasha 19871987]

Lavrov is a good man, smart, about Iran agrees with him ... they all want to live ... only amers are doing all their evil deeds there, trying to rock the region into violence ....

[andrei332809]

naturally will not. even if Iran had nuclear weapons, they are not suicides. If used, the whole world will attack them and Russia will not be able to help. Lavrov is an uncle smart, it is unlikely that he will speak unreasonably

[burn]

All military suppression in the world and provocations in the east and what happened in Iraq in Libya and what is done in Syria. To get closer to Iran and destroy it as an oil power and bring down the price of Russia in the world oil market and at the same time approach the Russian borders in the south. US financial circles and special services in the same harness with Israeli Zionists ...

[dimon-media]

That straight sick already from the instability in the Middle East. What the hell ... Amers go in there with the European Union and the litter countries in which the White House poses are in power? Zadolbal already this conglomerate! The question is of course rhetorical, I apologize. this is a no brainer that the flaming east (and not only the East) is beneficial to them, and Iran sits like a splinter in them ... that is, in a soft place. Digging out - it hurts, and you can get dirty in g ... e .. not picking out, it gets in the way (I'm talking about Iran) but in general, maintaining conflicts is beneficial for their geopolitics and economics. Wow zadolbali !!! Fuck them!
ZY what kind of phobia is this ..? Doesn't Iran have the right to a peaceful atom ?! Even if not peaceful ?! How can they defend their sovereignty against the inclinations of the coalition to the Middle East and defend their interests ?! nat. army and conventional weapons? The navel will burst ... there is only one deterrent left, it will brainwash them. This is a Nuclear Weapon. I am "FOR" Iran to have a nuclear potential. so it will be calmer. Cool hot heads.

[NAV-STAR]

Lavrov well done. And the rigidity of his statements is directly proportional to the state of the armed forces of the Russian Federation.

[Leisure]

Lavrov: Iran does not intend to attack Israel with nuclear weapons. Until.

[dimon-media]

)) The key word is "YET" He blabbed it?))

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Lazer

Avrov: Iran does not intend to attack Israel with nuclear weapons.

But, Israel and the United States intend to send Iran to the Stone Age. Perhaps these countries need to be asked.

[klimpopov]

Here I agree with you again! As long as it is not going to attack Israel with nuclear weapons (not ready / not available), Russia may stop Iran’s nuclear program, or it may not stop, and Iran is not going to deliver nuclear attacks against Israel, it can deliver simple ones - this is what begs itself between the lines ...

[omsbon]

I have great respect for Lavrov.

Statements of the current kind are not made in vain. So there are grounds and agreements with Iran.

[Vanek]

"Russia is the only country that can stop Iran's nuclear program without any sanctions or military intervention." Н

Well, do you understand? Do you get it? AND? How is it. Pride for the Motherland Already mother do not grieve.

[in reserve]

Iran will not attack Israel with atomic weapons.

Well, the grandmother said in two.

In turn, Rivlin noted that "Russia is the only country that can stop Iran’s nuclear program without any sanctions or military intervention."

Again they flatter us, they suck, no country will stop Iran if they bomb the bomb.

[Bashkaus]

Knowing Lavrov and the fact that he does not throw words to the wind, I suggest you think about the phrase "Iran will not attack Israel with atomic weapons." For a moment, think about the very wording thoroughly.
This is not "Iran is not going to create nuclear weapons"
This is not "Iran has no nuclear weapons"
This is clear and clear: "Iran will not attack Israel with atomic weapons" I think the meaning of this phrase sounds like this: Guys, relax, whether you like it or not, Iran has nuclear weapons, but this does not mean that the Iranian leaders will use nuclear weapons against Israel , and I (Lavrov) with this statement give you a guarantee and guarantees from Russia that Iran does not want a nuclear war and I give you my word of honor.
Something like this, I understood the meaning of his statement.

[Ruslan67]

this is if only they threw several charges to them in an emergency and kept them under control, or maybe just a bluff, but such that it’s more expensive to check on your own skin

[in reserve]

Yes, everything is simple, there isn’t any hidden meaning here because it is not needed, it’s you who thought and fantasize. Iran does not have nuclear weapons in the future, otherwise the United States would not have threatened so and would have spoken differently. In my understanding, the idea here is that one does not need to be so worried about Iran’s nuclear program for peaceful purposes only.
And I think that Iran should not have nuclear weapons at all, because they are fanatics and at any moment they could be used if they were.
But everyone does not have their own opinion to impose their point of view.

[Ilyukha]

Listened to American propaganda?
Iran is a stable and fairly developed country for the Middle East in technical terms, its auto industry, aircraft, energy, and electronics. This is far from a collective farm.
They had no technical problem to make an atomic bomb already 15-20 years ago. But they didn’t. So, they really don't need it.
Iran wants peace. That's all.

[Vladimir 70]

Baskaus, I agree with you! Because in the statements of diplomats there is a double, or even a triple subtext, you can translate Lavrov’s statement: you’ll climb into Iran, you’ll get snot, including Iran’s use of nuclear weapons for protection.

[Lesorub]

Lavrov, of course - well done, but HOW famously GDP drives! ... PLAYS "all over the field"! ! Russia's authority is GROWING! ! !