The American press, citing the Pentagon: The use of missiles by the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine broke US records

121

The United States monitors daily the number of missile launches carried out by Russian troops during a special operation in Ukraine. As noted, this figure has long reached "incredible values" and continues to grow, breaking all records of US military campaigns - and this despite the fact that the American army is traditionally guided by the doctrine of a massive missile strike when conducting large-scale military operations.

US records broken


This information is published daily on an increasing basis on two resources - on the Twitter account of the CSIS research organization and Amanda Macias, a reporter for CNBC, who refer to Pentagon data. Their rates of missile use do not differ much: over 1300 and 1200 launches, respectively, as of March 28 and 24.



We are talking about strikes with cruise, ballistic and, more recently, hypersonic missiles: "Caliber" from sea carriers, Kh-101 and "Dagger" air-based, 9M723 and 9M728 from OTRK "Iskander-M", "Onyx" or "Yakhont" from the coastal self-propelled complex "Bastion-P".

As indicated on the Altyn73 LJ resource, the use of missiles by Russia during the Ukrainian crisis has long broken all US records: during Operation Desert Storm in 1991 (Iraq), the American coalition used 297 sea- and air-based cruise missiles, Desert Fox 1998 years (Iraq) - over 400, "Allied Force" 1999 (Yugoslavia) - more than 300, "Dawn of the Odyssey" 2011 (Libya) - over 400.



The Pentagon is confused


The US Department of Defense clearly did not expect the Russian troops to have such a large arsenal of cruise and ballistic missiles, mainly Caliber. At first, the Pentagon stated that missiles of this type should end by March 20. Now it is already reported that the RF Armed Forces have used up half of their reserves. But it is not exactly...

The arsenal of cruise missiles [RF Armed Forces] will be large, but not bottomless. They [the Russian military] must choose their targets carefully.

- pointed out before the start of the special operation in Ukraine, one of the "experts" of the RUSI research center at the British Ministry of Defense, referring to a certain secret report on the release in the Russian Federation in 2018 of only 180 "Caliber".

Now the Pentagon has gone to the other extreme, claiming, as explained in Reuters, that Russian missiles are showing extremely poor performance:

The failure rate of some missiles, depending on their types, exceeds 50%, and for some it reaches 60%.

On what basis such a conclusion was made, of course, is not reported.
Following this, Western "experts" on the pages of Forbes rushed to criticize the missile arsenal of the Russian Armed Forces for "improper storage", which allegedly affects combat use weapons:

Missiles either do not launch, or miss the target, or do not detonate on contact.

Is this information from Zelensky? Or Arestovich?..

It is noted that the Russian defense industry is extremely dependent on Western electronics, which, under sanctions, allegedly will not allow finding the appropriate filling for the production of new missiles (although it is immediately stipulated that computer chips can be supplied by China). Allegedly, for this reason, corrected artillery shells [Krasnopol] and hypersonic missiles Kinzhal, “which hit insignificant targets such as an oil depot,” were used; even the use of chemical weapons is expected against the background of the depletion of the reserves of the Kyrgyz Republic.

Since when should oil depots supplying fuel to the Armed Forces of Ukraine suddenly be considered insignificant targets?

Despite all the "forecasts" of the Pentagon and Western "experts", Russian troops continue to use missiles to suppress the enemy's battle formations and infrastructure, bringing the day of his surrender closer.
121 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +55
    29 March 2022 13: 49
    Russia has a lot more to offer - to surprise the American press, the Pentagon, NATO and all sympathizers. Directly to a heart attack to bring even non-cores!
    1. +58
      29 March 2022 14: 04
      The failure rate of some missiles, depending on their types, exceeds 50%, and for some it reaches 60%.
      These are our missiles, they carry out the order and even if they fail by 99%, they will still reach the target! They will not fly, they will reach on foot, I am 2000% sure of this! laughing
      1. +73
        29 March 2022 14: 10
        - Comrade political officer! Out of cartridges!
        - Ivanov You are a communist!
        And the machine gun shot with renewed vigor.
        1. +22
          29 March 2022 14: 30
          only here the cartridges did not end, the mattresses forgot the news from the times of Syria that Russia will increase the number of KR by 30 times
          News from 2013
          Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said that Russia will increase the number of cruise missiles by 2020 times by 30. Moreover, Secretary of the Security Council Nikolai Patrushev noted that it is planned to finalize the military doctrine of 2010 in connection with the changing situation in the world and the development of weapons.



          Russia will increase the number of cruise missiles five times in three years, and 2020 times by 30, ITAR-TASS reports. This was announced by Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu following a meeting of the Security Council. "In three years, we will increase the number of cruise missiles by five times from today's number, and by 2020 - by 30 times," Shoigu stressed.


          and in the end it came out
          news from 2020
          The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation presented a report on the pace of development of the Russian Armed Forces from 2012 to 2020. According to the data given in the Krasnaya Zvezda newspaper, over the past eight years the number of long-range cruise missiles has increased 37 times in Russia. These include cruise missiles of the Iskander-M ground-based complex, naval Caliber and aviation Kh-101.

          In addition, the number of carriers of long-range cruise missiles has increased 13 times - these are Iskander-M operational-tactical systems, Navy ships and long-range aircraft. All of them are referred to the section "Strategic non-nuclear forces".
          1. +24
            29 March 2022 14: 55
            so they don’t read the Red Star, but tiktok Facebook, there is more reliable information laughing
            1. +1
              31 March 2022 09: 56
              Pentagon: The use of Russian missiles in Ukraine broke US records

              Someone said that we have 100 cruise missiles for the entire army ..)
          2. PN
            +19
            29 March 2022 16: 26
            Why did we start the WSO? Because all our warehouses are full of missiles and there is nowhere to put new ones from the assembly line ...
          3. 0
            29 March 2022 20: 13
            At one time, we had a decent number of 3M-10 missiles, the predecessors of the Caliber. They fired from launchers, torpedo tubes, etc. It was loaded onto the carrier easily, lightly, in a container ... I wonder if something was left of that amount and can it somehow be combined with the Caliber launcher? But it is, just curious. I ran into them in the 80s. Wikipedia writes that they remained in storage.
        2. +3
          29 March 2022 21: 50
          "We make rockets like sausages" (c)
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +3
            30 March 2022 13: 05
            "...
            It is noted that the Russian defense industry is extremely dependent on Western electronics, which, under sanctions, allegedly will not allow finding the appropriate filling for the production of new missiles (although it is immediately stipulated that computer chips can be supplied by China). Allegedly, for this reason, corrected artillery shells [Krasnopol] and hypersonic missiles Kinzhal, “which hit insignificant targets such as an oil depot,” were used; even the use of chemical weapons is expected against the background of the depletion of the reserves of the Kyrgyz Republic.
            ..."
            - it's just a SINGLE ...
            Like in Russia there are not enough "chips" for SUBSONIC cruise missiles, the "chips" and boards of which are enough to withstand accelerations / overloads up to 10-100 "g".
            .
            And that is why, like, Russia switched to GUIDED artillery shells "krasnopol", - into "chips" and boards (!) In which they must withstand an acceleration of 10.000 (TEN THOUSAND !!!!) "but" (with a gun shot) .. .
            8-)))
            .
            here, by God, is the case when they DOESN'T MATTER WHAT and HOW TO WRITE ... maybe - and write ...
            8- (
      2. +12
        29 March 2022 16: 05
        How a missile failure rate of 50% is achieved:
        The Americans launched a nuclear missile in the direction of the USSR, they responded to them.
        Two nuclear missiles are encountered, the Soviet one asks the American:
        - And how far are you going?
        - Yes, I'm flying to you in Moscow, but where are you going?
        - And I'll come to you in Washington ...
        - Listen, so according to our custom, we should drink for a meeting!
        Poured into a glass, drank, an American rocket:
        - Well, did you fly further?
        - Where did you fly? According to our custom, after the first, they immediately drink the second!
        Poured another glass, drank.
        American rocket:
        - All right, let's fly away!
        - Where to fly? You will fly to us - you will die, I will fly to you - I will die, you need to drink for peace!
        They poured another glass, drank it, an American rocket:
        - Oh, something is not good for me ...
        Soviet rocket:
        - Well then, come on dear, I will see you home ...
        1. +10
          29 March 2022 17: 46
          I remember how Yu. Nikulin told this anecdote.
      3. +2
        30 March 2022 08: 27
        It will be necessary, they will crawl))
      4. 0
        30 March 2022 22: 53
        This is not all. They still wonder and wonder where so many missiles come from, and how they successfully miss right on targets. This is not Yugoslavia, where at the time of the conflict the military were in their places, and did not wander around peaceful cities. But their missiles, as they often hit the cities ...
    2. +3
      29 March 2022 14: 52
      not to surprise them, but to intimidate
    3. +2
      29 March 2022 16: 41
      USA found something to envy laughing It would be better to envy Russian decency.
      1. 0
        31 March 2022 05: 22
        Quote: Wend
        USA found something to envy laughing It would be better to envy Russian decency.

        To be fair, the states have nothing to envy. EMNIP, they can simultaneously launch up to 2500 cruise missiles into the air. I repeat, at the same time.
        1. 0
          31 March 2022 10: 29
          Quote: ROSS_51
          Quote: Wend
          USA found something to envy laughing It would be better to envy Russian decency.

          To be fair, the states have nothing to envy. EMNIP, they can simultaneously launch up to 2500 cruise missiles into the air. I repeat, at the same time.

          In theory, in theory, the Russian economy and the United States can be torn to shreds laughing
    4. +5
      29 March 2022 18: 24
      Don't ask where. As of 12.01.22/97000/1, Russia has 200 calibers, 101 ml of yahont missiles, x-1.500 76800 m / t, XNUMX dagger missiles, and now let them think in the USA what and how much, we have enough of this stuff, this is a little of that , what could I say, I'm waiting for the cons, from where I won't say!
      hi lol
      1. +1
        29 March 2022 20: 29
        Where did you write from. But no one knows who this Kudo is.
        1. +1
          29 March 2022 21: 34
          Not all the same information to say, and where! hi a spelling mistake, it happens, my oversight!
      2. 0
        31 March 2022 05: 18
        Quote: belovvladimir
        Don't ask where. As of 12.01.22/97000/1, Russia has 200 calibers, 101 ml of yahont missiles, x-1.500 76800 m / t, XNUMX dagger missiles, and now let them think in the USA what and how much, we have enough of this stuff, this is a little of that , what could I say, I'm waiting for the cons, from where I won't say!
        hi lol

        97000 calibers? 76800 daggers? And how many carriers for them, do not tell me? Don't answer, don't, it's a rhetorical question. Stop watching RenTV.
        Previously, at least in the comments, more or less competent comrades unsubscribed, but now, with the start of the special operation, they are silent, like a fish on ice.
        But the division of sofas drove up.
        1. 0
          31 March 2022 10: 02
          In time of unrest, all means are good, but what do you need an official report? And won't there be much?
          1. -1
            April 1 2022 05: 07
            Quote: belovvladimir
            In time of unrest, all means are good, but what do you need an official report? And won't there be much?

            What embarrassment? If you produce fakes (or rather, just talking nonsense), then at least plausible .. 97 thousand calibers .. ppc. I would be glad if there were 9 thousand.
            And really, go do your homework .. In my opinion, your Russian is lame.
  2. +54
    29 March 2022 13: 52
    We haven’t got the sapper shovels yet, we’re saving for NATO ...
    1. +6
      29 March 2022 14: 59
      Quote: vitvit123
      We haven’t got the sapper shovels yet, we’re saving for NATO ...

      They, the poor, don't even know what kind of new high-tech type of weapon it is ... If there is an order, we will show it.
    2. fiv
      +7
      29 March 2022 16: 08
      And the construction battalion is still in reserve. We follow humanism!
    3. +2
      29 March 2022 16: 53
      We haven’t got the sapper shovels yet, we’re saving for NATO ...
      No, it’s not like that: we haven’t sowed densely with FABs yet. We save for NATO.
  3. +11
    29 March 2022 13: 52
    This is the transfer of "obvious-incredible" for you Envy silently
  4. +30
    29 March 2022 13: 53
    Work brothers!! And take care of yourself!!
  5. +10
    29 March 2022 13: 54
    Airborne anti-radar missiles must also be added to the heap.
    1. +6
      29 March 2022 14: 08
      Quote: Pavel57
      we must also add aviation anti-radar missiles.

      They also applied.
    2. +6
      29 March 2022 14: 10
      Something tells me that they no longer have a radar
      1. Aag
        +4
        29 March 2022 14: 18
        Quote: Fedor M
        Something tells me that they no longer have a radar

        S.K. Shoigu announced how much was, how much is left.
  6. +19
    29 March 2022 13: 56
    "Even the use of chemical weapons is expected against the background of the depletion of the reserves of the Kyrgyz Republic." And where do we need this chem. take weapons, ours was destroyed. Buy from the Americans? Again, for rubles or whatever. And in general it is very interesting to see how a tank farm or an arsenal of chemicals can be. destroy with weapons. Share your work. Parrots, everyone is talking about this chemical weapon. Are they preparing a provocation again?
    1. NKT
      +11
      29 March 2022 14: 07
      Of course they are preparing. Only, unlike Syria, I'm afraid that these will not be staged, but real use with real victims.
    2. +11
      29 March 2022 14: 08
      It is necessary to "dig up" in some of the former US laboratories in Ukraine "samples" of pathogens and give a test tube to Lavrov - so that he would pass it to Nebenza. Nebenzya will shake a test tube at the UN and tell that we did find traces.
      And we can also show Biden’s correspondence with his son, where the grandfather writes: Son, tell the laboratories there to make more of the new coronavirus - we will spray it to the Chinese at the end of 19. Yes, let the soldiers of the Kiev garrison test vaccinations against a new smallpox ....
      This fake will be similar to Collin Powell's fake at the UN, where he shook a test tube with flour from Iraq ...
      1. +3
        29 March 2022 15: 48
        Quote: mojohed2012
        "samples" of pathogens and give the test tube to Lavrov - so that he gives it to Nebenza. Nebenzya will shake a test tube at the UN and tell ....

        ... and spray, right there.
        1. +2
          30 March 2022 17: 36
          Enough shaking it, just drop it with words - sorry, I'm so awkward today that everyone rushed to the toilet in a crowd.
    3. +1
      29 March 2022 15: 00
      Quote: Vladimir 290
      And where do we need this chem. take weapons, ours was destroyed. Buy from the Americans? Again, for rubles or whatever.

      Exchange for captured Natsiks.
  7. +8
    29 March 2022 13: 57
    And we are still fighting not at full strength, protecting the civilian population and destroying evil spirits POINTLY.
  8. +4
    29 March 2022 13: 58
    Do not be afraid - we have a reserve for you).
  9. +8
    29 March 2022 13: 59
    If necessary, we do not mind hitting such an "insignificant" target as the White House with the Dagger! We are not greedy, we will still make missiles good lol
  10. +5
    29 March 2022 14: 05
    Well, as in the old joke, when a drunken ensign in Siberia hid a dozen ballistic missiles "just in case, for himself ..." hid .... laughing
  11. +7
    29 March 2022 14: 05
    Despite all the "forecasts" of the Pentagon and Western "experts", Russian troops continue to use missiles to suppress the enemy's battle formations and infrastructure, bringing the day of his surrender closer.
    . Well, yes, cartoons for real!
    For many, this turned out to be ... a shocking, sad, and even fatal fact.
  12. +12
    29 March 2022 14: 07
    Missiles either do not launch, or miss the target, or do not detonate on contact.

    What is your evidence? (from)
    Is there a photo with unexploded rockets? Not? Then don't pry!
    1. +6
      29 March 2022 14: 26
      Of course there is a photo, but according to the old tradition, nothing will be shown to anyone.
    2. +1
      30 March 2022 05: 39
      But you are in vain, there is no need to dissuade the faithful. Let them continue to think so, calms. Krylov.
  13. +20
    29 March 2022 14: 08
    They also talk about efficiency, when out of the entire huge number of launched calibers, confirmed shot down, there are just a few, and the number of missiles in a single launch is often equal to the number of confirmed hit targets. Whether business, for example, an epic strike with axes on Syria. When more than half of the 60 missiles launched had evaporated, almost whole rockets that had not reached anywhere were lying around the Syrian fields, and among the confirmed hit targets were two clay three-story buildings and a runway, the use of which was resumed the very next day. This is what I understand, there was a real success with mattresses.
    1. Aag
      +3
      29 March 2022 14: 25
      Quote: VinceT
      They also talk about efficiency, when out of the entire huge number of launched calibers, confirmed shot down, there are just a few, and the number of missiles in a single launch is often equal to the number of confirmed hit targets. Whether business, for example, an epic strike with axes on Syria. When more than half of the 60 missiles launched had evaporated, almost whole rockets that had not reached anywhere were lying around the Syrian fields, and among the confirmed hit targets were two clay three-story buildings and a runway, the use of which was resumed the very next day. This is what I understand, there was a real success with mattresses.

      Where does the info about the confirmed downed "Caliber" come from?
      1. +13
        29 March 2022 14: 58
        there were a couple of photos, obviously different places, downed air defense remnants ... there would be more shot down or failed - dill would fill up the entire Internet with them ... so our weapons are very effective! Glory to our Soviet military-industrial complex!
      2. +6
        29 March 2022 15: 22
        I'm also wondering if there is at least one confirmed case of interception? And wonder what?
        Most likely, such cases are born in the drug-inflamed brain of a non-president of a non-country.
      3. +3
        29 March 2022 15: 37
        I personally watched the video of two confirmed cases. As far as I remember, in Kyiv or its environs, which is logical, given that the highest concentration of air defense systems was there. And all this was in the early days of the start of the operation, when the Ukrainian air defense still had at least some signs of a unified system. Well, after the air defense turned into a focal one, all the stories about downed missiles moved to the myth-making section, because there were no more photos or video evidence.
    2. 0
      29 March 2022 16: 56
      you didn’t seem to see a photo of an aircraft, like the Su27, in a concrete caponier, exactly stitched with a rocket?
  14. +1
    29 March 2022 14: 10
    Monthly release of calibers: 20 pieces. Shoigu spoke about that two years ago.
    But there is no information on the Iskanders
  15. +11
    29 March 2022 14: 13
    US intelligence is based on materials from social networks and our commentators on VO that "everything is gone", all electronics from Ali Express! So it is! bully
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. +6
    29 March 2022 14: 14
    The agony of mattresses, I think that we will be able to surprise them with many other things :)
  18. +6
    29 March 2022 14: 21
    "Yes, he has grenades of the wrong system" - this is a note to mattresses.
  19. +8
    29 March 2022 14: 23
    Listening to all these experts, analysts, the Western media is not at all grateful, especially lately, fabulous stars, and Biden is the main star there, then dollars of 200 rubles each, then the calibers are over. Enough for everyone, in line with am ki.
  20. +2
    29 March 2022 14: 30
    Quote: Denis812
    Monthly release of calibers: 20 pieces. Shoigu spoke about that two years ago.
    But there is no information on the Iskanders

    https://topwar.ru/121351-shoygu-minoborony-poluchilo-60-raket-kalibr-i-brigadnyy-komplekt-iskanderov.html

    Shoigu: The Ministry of Defense received 60 Kalibr missiles and a brigade set of Iskanders July 26, 2017

    In the second quarter, the Russian defense industry supplied the troops with a brigade set of Iskander-M complexes, 60 Caliber cruise missiles and other weapons, Interfax reports a message from Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.
  21. +3
    29 March 2022 14: 31
    Now they mainly shoot and launch ammunition with an expiring warranty period. This also applies to rockets and artillery shells and Katyushas. We still have a bunch of shells and cartridges from WWII. I remember back in the 70s every other time they gave cartridges at the shooting range with a release date of 44-45 on zinc.
    I read another authoritative expert, in order to fight a superior enemy like NATO, we need to launch up to 30000 (up to thirty thousand !!!) operational and tactical missiles against enemy troops per month to win. And this is much less tonnage than we dropped bombs and shells on the Germans in WWII. soldier
    1. 0
      30 March 2022 17: 41
      And what did you shoot at the shooting range then? TT, PPSh?
      1. 0
        30 March 2022 18: 34
        PKT, DShK, Simonov carbine, RPK, Kalashnikov 7.62, T-34 (85mm cannon and machine gun).
        1. 0
          31 March 2022 17: 43
          And a lot of ammunition for them 44 .. 45? Without T34
          1. 0
            31 March 2022 19: 12
            At the time it was a secret, but I think not a little. Everything whole and fit for shooting was then installed in fortified areas on the border with China. T-34s were buried and concreted along the tower.
            1. 0
              April 1 2022 18: 48
              PKT, DShK, Simonov carbine, RPK, Kalashnikov assault rifle 7.62

              I'm talking about this weapon and the power supply for it
              1. 0
                April 1 2022 20: 19
                PKT understands the cartridges from the three-ruler, but the cartridges for Kalashnikov were produced before the appearance of the machine gun, I don’t remember exactly, the year 45-46, the form of zinc was original, and not like later in the style of cans.
  22. +4
    29 March 2022 14: 32
    why are they so sure that the Russian Federation cannot produce electronics on its own, what a mythical world that Russia is lagging behind ... they believed in this even when the USSR began to launch moon rovers, there you won’t have a radio-controlled machine ... clowns
  23. +1
    29 March 2022 14: 34
    Quote: ANIMAL
    Russia has a lot more to offer - to surprise the American press, the Pentagon, NATO and all sympathizers. Directly to a heart attack to bring even non-cores!

    That's for sure, for example "The flight of a hypersonic missile. What went unnoticed? Details that not many could see" part 1 and part 2
    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHqGmFRQDQy_Jptn14aRZjQ
  24. +5
    29 March 2022 14: 37
    Missiles either do not launch, or miss the target, or do not detonate on contact.
    Is this information from Zelensky? Or Arestovich?..

    They are talking about their own, Ukrainian missiles! That's why they ask for something all the time.
    1. +1
      29 March 2022 15: 11
      "Come on dangy! Come on dangy!" (12 chairs)
      1. -1
        30 March 2022 17: 04
        A little not so. "Give me a mulien! Well, give me a mulien! You have a lot, give me a mulien!"
        1. +1
          30 March 2022 21: 54
          You are already quoting the "Golden Calf".
  25. +2
    29 March 2022 14: 49
    A great opportunity to test the use of missiles and their carriers. I am sure that as a result of this campaign, changes will be made and improvements will be made to these weapons. None of the exercises will not give such a rich experience in operation and application.
  26. +1
    29 March 2022 14: 51
    For example, for a NATO wedding or funeral, a higher priority target for the KR is than a cache or a rabble of terrorists
  27. +3
    29 March 2022 14: 56
    Show them today's "Kim's hut" after passing by ... This figure himself admitted the exact hit in his office, the poor fellow lost his collection of aikos, but I hope the bright socks remained on him.
  28. +7
    29 March 2022 15: 10
    Military missile technology works more stable and is better protected from external influences with technical processes at 65-70 nm, we have had this for a long time, China has reached 17 nm, but for military purposes this is too fragile stuffing. 3-17 nm is used for smartphones, but this snot is unsuitable for weapons and overloads, both physical and emi-impact. So we have the technical process most needed for the military dimensions of our production. But for powerful data collection and control systems - they need "snot", and smaller ones, but that's another story about Elbrus. Reutov is churning out Caliber at an accelerated pace and we should not know their production volumes, it’s great that the Yankee intelligence was unpleasantly surprised - this is the quality of counterintelligence work! Well done! As I understand it, that is why we are slowly hitting enemy targets as "extra" missiles enter the troops (the last bullet will not be fired by the General Staff of the Russian Federation, the enemies are not asleep on the sides) and all these "negotiations" are just fog to gain time for the production of missiles and rest l / s. As for the fuel bases, these are generally objects for strike number 1! Without fuel and lubricants, there is no armor and mobility of troops, and without accumulation at the bases in fuel trucks and canisters alone, you won’t get much, storing fuel and lubricants on the tracks is also suicide, one blow - and you were left without fuel, food, ammunition, equipment and ... without anything at all!
    1. +2
      29 March 2022 16: 24
      the last bullet of the General Staff of the Russian Federation will not be, the enemies are not asleep on the sides

      I really hope that there are enough of them left too.
      1. +2
        29 March 2022 19: 51
        As the respected fighter-bomber wrote: "believe me, we have a lot of missiles and cast iron."
  29. sen
    +5
    29 March 2022 15: 13
    The American press, citing the Pentagon: The use of missiles by the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine broke US records

    In terms of numbers, we did not beat the US records in Iraq, but our missiles are more reliable and each target is verified.
    1. +2
      29 March 2022 17: 36
      1996 Iraq Desert Strike - 44 missiles
      1998 Iraq "Desert Fox" - 97 missiles for 415 targets.
      So in terms of missiles - we have a record!
  30. +2
    29 March 2022 15: 25
    The riddle was solved - why such a name, Pentagon. To drive a snowstorm with a smart look, in such quantities, you have to try. And now ... the gonovtsy are breaking their brains - which will end faster - banderlogs or missiles in Russia?
  31. +2
    29 March 2022 15: 41
    There are never too many rockets.
  32. +2
    29 March 2022 15: 48

    Oh, that American press :)
    Between 1999 and 2011, it seems that the United States was involved in another war - about which the American press decided to abstain? Or does the comparison of the American level of 2003 and the sun of the Russian Federation in 2022 no longer look so patriotic?
  33. +3
    29 March 2022 15: 59
    They have a record in Iraq 2003 - 802 Tomahawks and 153s B-52s in total 955.
  34. +5
    29 March 2022 16: 06
    The "dagger" was not slammed at the oil depot. They were slammed into the minds of Americans convinced that our warnings were cartoons. Let's make sure we never lie. They said, we will strike with nuclear weapons first, if we face a threat, then we will do so.
  35. +3
    29 March 2022 16: 22
    It remains to remember that all types of weapons can be made with a special warhead, and someone, especially Europe, should get very sick ...
  36. +3
    29 March 2022 16: 23
    I am surprised that Tochka-U did not remain and were not used in the RF Armed Forces; it was quite possible to transfer the LDNR to suppress artillery positions.
    1. +1
      29 March 2022 17: 11
      Points like only on storage. Most likely, there were no personnel trained in commercial quantities, yet guided weapons are not a Kalashnikov assault rifle.
    2. +1
      29 March 2022 20: 07
      VIKI writes that Point U in Russia was decommissioned and replaced by Iskander in 2019.
      1. +2
        29 March 2022 22: 12
        Where did they put them ... .. and there were a lot of them.
  37. +5
    29 March 2022 16: 48
    I don't really know if it's a plus or a minus. comparison with amers is incorrect. they were NEVER concerned with the accuracy of their strikes out of interest in causing no collateral damage. they were NEVER shy. But missiles were used mainly at the initial stage (for surprise) and especially important targets, which simply cannot be approached. Their main weapon has ALWAYS been aviation. so that where ours use Calibers and daggers, the Americans would stupidly bomb, smashing everything around at the same time. However, they also have guided bombs, which, it must be understood, we practically do not use.
    1. -1
      29 March 2022 22: 13
      They have always wondered about it. We still have to cut and cut to them.
  38. +1
    29 March 2022 19: 15
    Are they about our missiles or, after all, about their own, which do not work and return back? For some reason I am sure that our old stocks are being used up. New ones are not needed yet.
  39. 0
    29 March 2022 19: 24
    The failure rate is so high 50% to 60% ? Surly the US (slaves) must have recovered Hypersonic -Weapons to reverse engineer ?
    1. +1
      29 March 2022 19: 36
      Today's photos and videos ex Nikolaev show no failures winked
      1. 0
        29 March 2022 21: 05
        I do not think there would be much to re-engineer of a hypersonic weapon, even if it failed to detonate.
        1. +3
          29 March 2022 21: 33
          Pal, hypersonic strike was made just once within this conflict for a while. No even any significant remains to re-engineer.
          second. They say 1,200 launches fixed and 50% failures. That means that more than 600 missiles should be laid in the fields and cities across Ukraine. Ukrainians have shown for a while just one X-101 cruise missile and couple of "calibers" shot down above Kiev on one hand. On another hand our officials say about 1,100 military infrastructure objects hit + about 250 RADAR's and AAA systems destroyed. The sum looks more or less conforming to the launches number. Once again, if 60% failures - where are the photos and videos of the missiles fallen? Now even each and every kid has a mobile phone with a camera. Think yourself, man! hi
  40. -3
    29 March 2022 19: 29
    Regarding electronics, I wanted to tell an interesting fact. Throughout January and February, it was impossible to send any parcels to Russia from South Korea. All transports were busy with something. I wonder if they brought microcircuits for calibers?
  41. -3
    29 March 2022 19: 33
    Quote: Fisherman
    impact during technical processes at 65-70 nm, we have had this for a long time,

    I would be glad if you confirmed your words with some link to the place where we make such processors.
    I'd buy. So far, unfortunately, we don’t even have 200 nanometer technology
    1. -1
      29 March 2022 21: 02
      https://sfera.zone/ru/
    2. -1
      30 March 2022 17: 32
      Mikron promises to launch a plant at 28 nm as well. Such factories are already operating in Shenzhen.
  42. +2
    29 March 2022 20: 15
    Another nonsense from mattress covers! (((
  43. -1
    29 March 2022 20: 56
    there is also electronic warfare that can, if not turn off all of Europe, then definitely deprive half of the electronics with all the ensuing consequences.
  44. 0
    29 March 2022 21: 43
    Do not be afraid of the warriors from the Pentagon. There will be enough missiles for everyone, incl. and NATO. By the way, was the launch of the Buk M1 rocket in 2014 not tracked? It's time to confess for the death of people and the plane near Donetsk in Grabovo.
  45. 0
    29 March 2022 21: 58
    about the article, we do not use white phosphorus, cluster charges and various junk from rockets !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    ps people are closer to us than the area!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    and to be honest, there is nothing to compare))))))))))))
  46. 0
    30 March 2022 08: 44
    Let them envy in silence, but there is nothing to say about efficiency, 10 times more effective than their "vaunted" tomahawks ..... wassat
  47. 0
    30 March 2022 08: 46
    Ours have not yet used the Daredevil mines and many other things, but Chinese electronics are only used for Tomahawks! am
  48. 0
    30 March 2022 09: 59
    It's good that they think so. in the future, perhaps this will turn out to be an unpleasant surprise for them. what would not be desirable.
  49. 0
    30 March 2022 11: 18
    Ukrainians shoot at points U and some even fly, I have a suspicion that even though they were removed from service with us, they still have to remain with military hamsters in all sorts of storage warehouses, they couldn’t dispose of everything in a couple of years, a couple of thousand according to anyone, somewhere at the bases, they can be disposed of by shooting somewhere in the direction of the ukrov.
  50. -2
    30 March 2022 12: 17
    The Pentagon is not at a loss, but rather bewildered. How did it happen, a huge number of missiles were fired, but the goals were not achieved.
  51. 0
    30 March 2022 12: 30
    Well, compared to their missiles, ours may have fallen, but there is no evidence, not just empty chatter. But with their axes there are a lot of rollers, and if I’m not mistaken, they were stupidly led away from the target.
  52. 0
    30 March 2022 13: 08
    They don't like everything! All wrong! This is a clear sign that things are moving in the right direction.
  53. +1
    30 March 2022 14: 16
    In my opinion, oil depots and fuel depots are even more important targets than purely military ones. Without fuel, the equipment stops, and then - partisanship. No missile would be spared, especially a massive one, to destroy an oil depot or a fuel and lubricants warehouse. In times of war, all such objects are legitimate targets.
    1. 0
      30 March 2022 14: 30
      good Certainly! He hit the target and stopped the tank; he hit the tanks and stopped the tank battalion. Deprived of the opportunity to maneuver, carry out an attack.
  54. 0
    30 March 2022 14: 27
    The quantity is okay. This is good. The production began to be established and if anything happens, no one will be “offended.” And what they did with quality is a pitchfork in your neck.
  55. 0
    30 March 2022 16: 01
    That's where all the chips from the global auto industry went!
    And from flagship video cards not to mining farms in Kazakhstan!
  56. +1
    30 March 2022 16: 31
    The Americans are jealous of our successes, and, as always, they talk utter nonsense. It's funny to read their inventions.
  57. The comment was deleted.
  58. 0
    30 March 2022 18: 29
    Even the Ukrainians never showed a rocket falling due to failure laughing
  59. The comment was deleted.
  60. 0
    30 March 2022 22: 16
    How stupid they are!
  61. 0
    30 March 2022 23: 32
    The mattresses are talking some kind of nonsense, they seem to be copying the information warfare system of the Ukrainian Reich))

    It is known from reports that the effectiveness of American missiles in Iraq was below par. Up to 60% failure rate.
    Unexploded and fallen Rockets were literally lying around in the desert..

    Regarding 1300 missiles in Ukraine - it’s even funnier.
    It turns out that on the day Russia fired at targets in Ukraine -
    42 missiles each (1300/31=42)??!
    Not funny.
    You have to be completely brainless to believe this.

    During the operation,
    there were pauses when ours DID NOT FIRE missiles for 3..4 days..
    Karoche.
    They are whipping up hysteria in order to extract more money from the budget for military spending.
    The old way, polished to a shine...