The Argentine press spoke about the states of Latin America with the potential deployment of missiles of the Russian Armed Forces

Russian officials draw parallels between current tensions with the US over Ukraine and the Cuban crisis in 1962, when the Soviet Union deployed nuclear missiles in the country and the United States attempted to maintain a naval blockade of the island.

The current threat expressed by Russia is a repetition of the policy pursued in the past

- noted in the Argentine edition of Pucará Defensa, which talks about Latin American countries with the potential deployment of Russian missiles.

Soviet planes taking off from Cuba patrolled the airspace near the United States until the collapse of the USSR. As indicated, in 2000, Russian President Vladimir Putin, "seeking to improve ties with Washington," ordered the closure of military facilities on the island. However, under current conditions, “Russia intends to bring the Cold War back to Latin America” by deploying missiles and other weapons in the region.

As explained, the ground for this has already been prepared. In December 2018, the Russian Federation sent a pair of Tu-160 bombers capable of carrying nuclear weapons to Venezuela. weapon. As the author writes, regularly, several times a year, an Il-96-400VPU, flying over Venezuela, enters Colombian airspace and heads to Nicaragua, conducting electronic reconnaissance.

Russia has long been exploring its military return to Cuba, and has repeatedly considered basing [troops] in Venezuela and Nicaragua

- the author notes.

According to him, Russian special forces could participate in the fight against FARC guerrillas in western Venezuela; Moscow is helping to restore the combat effectiveness of the country's Su-30 fleet (which generally has a lot of equipment from the Russian Federation), while Russian pilots may be at the controls of these fighters. Nicaragua has converted its army to a large number of products of Russian origin, including Tanks, armored vehicles and artillery.

The possibility of establishing Russian military bases in Latin America could again spawn something similar to the 1962 missile crisis, albeit on a larger scale, as Russia this time targeted several countries

- the conclusion is made in the Argentine press.

Comments

[yuriy55]

The possibility of creating military bases of the RF Armed Forces in Latin America could again give rise to something similar to the 1962 missile crisis of the year

Look how concerned they are... And the situation with NATO forces on the borders of Russia cannot again give rise to something similar to June 1941?
Or, "this is a leg - who needs a leg" ...

[alex neym_2]

An American transporter with weapons in Cueva - a Russian in Nicaragua or Venezuela: an exchange of courtesies ...

[Labrador]

Did they forget something about the Malvinas Islands? You could potentially call

[harpun0073]

To be honest, I like the name of the Malvinas Islands more than the Falklands. Moreover, the Argentine pilots did more to win than the British https://zen.yandex.ru/media/mlozha/ataka-na-nepobedimogo-5e85cec04b7ab909516e63f2, despite the fact that Argentina lost that war.

[Thrifty]

Mexico needs to be more active, help them get Texas back, for starters. And, there we will place our military bases, including in Mexican Texas ...

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

Golden thought. Hai Zheve Nezalezhnaya Tehaschina!)

[Slap]

Mexico can’t control its territory normally from cartels Texas give it to her?

[gsivbytw]

So is California and Florida - these are all the former possessions of Mexico and the Kingdom of Spain.

[Slap]

Well, why stop there? And Nevada, and New Mexico, Utah and half of Colorado.

[gsivbytw]

Do I mind!? I'm for it!!

[Barberry25]

not really, it’s not a leg, it’s so necessary .. the fact is that let’s say the Anglo-Saxon world with their sixes does not even consider the rights of others, so their bases at our borders are normal, and ours next to them is wrong. .and so it will always be

[Hypertension]

Cuba and Venezuela. How "unexpectedly" ... Muchas gracias to the publication "Pucará Defensa" for "discovering America" ​​and telling about the "open secret".

[den3080]

You can also work with Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia - Ejército del Pueblo FARC-EP
And generally speaking

[Hypertension]

Quote: den3080

And generally speaking

¡No pasarán!

[Sergej1972]

In Venezuela, the left is in power, and relations with Colombia are complicated. But it seems that the Venezuelan leaders and the military do not favor this structure and are fighting it. We will help the FARC - we will quarrel with Maduro.

[paul3390]

Let's help FARC

For them, as well as for all the partisans there, our current authorities are traitors and renegades. For they sold the first socialist state for loot ..

However, they are traitors and renegades for many of our citizens ..

[den3080]

Quote: Sergej1972

In Venezuela, the left is in power, and relations with Colombia are complicated. But it seems that the Venezuelan leaders and the military do not favor this structure and are fighting it. We will help the FARC - we will quarrel with Maduro.

FARC - left, just right. With the blessing of I.V. Stalin, in fact, was created.
If you really need to - reconcile. And they will make a mess for gringos from the Atlantic to the Pacific. And there is Nicaragua through Panama ... not far

[Sergej1972]

Latin American leftist radical movements are very respectful of the ideas of Trotsky and Mao.

[NDR-791]

Quote: Sergej1972

We will help the FARC - we will quarrel with Maduro.

Nothing, if you remember Black Panther Party for Self Defense and help people a little. And if, taking into account the "cousins" Oglaigh na hÉireann and help them, then no missiles need to be transported anywhere.

[NDR-791]

Yeah, crawl out under the bush, don't you like it ??? And we remember ... who needs help.

[Pereira]

Nothing new has been said.

[Sergei Zabelin]

Well, as if Argentina itself would not be bad for drying the 24th or 34th, otherwise the finely shaved ones were obnoxious at the end

[tralflot1832]

Why trifle, Argentina in the CSTO. We will fly in the winter in the summer. We just need to agree with them so that they don’t make holes for our fishermen with their dummies.

[Sergei Zabelin]

Well, normal rockets and bombs are included in the All inclusive package

[riwas]

In addition to Russia and Argentina, China has established serious economic relations.
https://riafan.ru/1482159-s-tochki-zreniya-obshego-blaga-argentinskii-ekonomist-rasskazal-fan-o-sotrudnichestve-s-kitaem
It seems that over time Argentina will join the SCO, and then the CSTO.

[Serg Kam]

Well, it would not be bad for Argentina itself to put drying 24th or 34th

Argentina refused to buy Russian MiG-35 fighters
https://avia.pro/news/argentina-otkazalas-ot-pokupki-rossiyskih-mig-35-vybrav-pakistanskie-jf-17

Or do you offer to supply them for free? The economy will not overstrain?

[svp67]

Honestly, right now I don’t see any restraining obstacles, so as not to restore military-technical cooperation with the same Cuba and supply it, free of charge, that is, for free, a batch of weapons, ranging from Kalash, even AK-74M and ending with naval and aviation equipment ... Fortunately, there is something to share in the reserves of the RF Ministry of Defense.

[Serg Kam]

put it, free of charge, that is, for free, a batch of weapons, ranging from "Kalash", even AK-74M and ending with marine and aviation equipment ... Fortunately, there is something to share in the reserves of the RF Ministry of Defense.

Are you sure that there are reserves?
How many aircraft were delivered to the army in 2021? 17, it seems, said the deputy minister of defense.
How much do you propose to donate?

[svp67]

Quote: SergKam

Are you sure that there are reserves?

I know that the reserves are significant, if not huge. Stocks of "Kalash" for several wartime armies, since the days of the USSR

Quote: SergKam

How many aircraft were delivered to the army in 2021? 17, it seems, said the deputy minister of defense.

And how much does it still cost at the storage bases of the same MiG-29 and is not used?

Quote: SergKam

How much do you propose to donate?

Yes, not very much. With a dozen MiG-29s, maybe a T-72B3 battalion and several thousand AKs ...

[Serg Kam]

And how much does it still cost at the storage bases of the same MiG-29 and is not used?

There are about 200 of them left.
And most will no longer fly - restoring is too expensive and problematic:
worn out and exhausted. a major overhaul with modernization will cost too much and is therefore impractical,” the representative of the Ministry of Defense explained the decision.
https://iz.ru/news/504391

The question arises: do you want to sell non-flying aircraft to Cuba? Will they be happy with this gift?
And to restore is cheaper to build a new one (according to the Ministry of Defense)
And we build 17 new aircraft a year.
Do you propose to give more than half of the built aircraft?

[svp67]

Quote: SergKam

And to restore is cheaper to build a new one (according to the Ministry of Defense)

And yet, they found for Libya, they found for Serbia, they found for Syria, and not only MiGs ...

[Serg Kam]

And yet, they found for Libya, they found for Serbia, they found for Syria, and not only MiGs ...

We return to the initial question: the economy will not overstrain? Are the lessons of the USSR forgotten?
The military budget is growing year by year.
In percentage terms, Russia's defense industry ranks first out of the five leading countries - it spends 4,3% of GDP on military needs, while the UK spends only 2,2%.

[svp67]

Quote: SergKam

We return to the initial question: the economy will not overstrain? Are the lessons of the USSR forgotten?

No, just as the lessons of the first decades of the Russian Federation have not been forgotten, when the defense industry was reduced to the level of a "plinth" ... I hope that we will get around both extremes.
Sometimes you need to spend a little, so as not to spend more later, much more. I think that our supply of such weapons can contribute to détente. Since the same United States understands only the language they speak themselves, that is, the language of power

Quote: SergKam

The military budget is growing year by year.

I would not say...

[Grits]

Quote: svp67

restore military-technical cooperation with the same Cuba and supply it, free of charge, that is, for free, a batch of weapons, ranging from Kalash, even AK-74M, to marine and aviation equipment ...

And why do they need it? Who is hatching plans to take over Cuba? And in the event of a US attack, nothing will save them, not even Russia. Yes, and the United States can attack only if we place our missiles there in a new way. So the Cubans do not need this for nothing.
At best - radar. In exchange for goods that are in high demand in Cuba

[svp67]

Quote: Gritsa

And why do they need it?

Since the collapse of the USSR, their weapons have not been updated, and they tend to wear out and fail.

Quote: Gritsa

Who is hatching plans to take over Cuba?

And this already depends on the work of our media ... Who prevents you from raising a fuss?

Quote: Gritsa

Yes, and the United States can attack only if we place our missiles there in a new way.

In this case, now, it certainly will not attack ...

[KCA]

The United States has already attacked, it did not work

[Barberry25]

well, for example, you can put a batch of brk, the same Ball fits very nicely into the local landscapes, but cover it all from above with s-300pm2 and beech-m2 ..

[carpenter]

As indicated, in 2000, Russian President Vladimir Putin, "seeking to improve ties with Washington," ordered the closure of military installations on the island.

Relations with Washington cannot be improved by any measures, even during the Second World War, Stalin could not have good relations with the United States, they pretended out of necessity that relations were improving, but after the capitulation of Japan, the hot phase began again. You couldn't really see how Yeltsin jumped out of his pants to be good in front of the United States, but no one there recognized "Boris's friend" even at the level of an African American.

[Kesha1980]

. “Russia intends to bring the Cold War back to Latin America by deploying missiles and other weapons in the region.

"Say no to the militaristic plans of Russia!") - the slogan of Argentina is read between the lines.
What will we answer to this "database front"? No, there is no such opposition from the times of the USSR. There is no approximately equal division into a "bipolar world"
confrontation between the two powers. Hard times, when there is not enough financial strength and the possibility of autonomous development.
It was necessary to start from the moment of "Kursk", now even many topics of open humiliation and spitting of the West cannot be recognized aloud by the leadership - for we will ask, why were we silent before?
And now we are alone. Cuba's debts were written off and they apologized for the drain. Iran (nafik is such an ally with the desire to destroy and destroy), China, which will always be alone. There is no opportunity for strategic alliances, no power, no respect.
And "his hut - dirty and unwashed."

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

in 2000, Russian President Vladimir Putin, "seeking to improve ties with Washington," ordered the closure of military installations on the island. However, under current conditions, “Russia intends to bring the Cold War back to Latin America” by deploying missiles and other weapons in the region.

Anyone who has been flown for the sake of "improving ties with the striped" will not forget this.

PS

[Normann]

At the moment, the Russian Federation has one ally - this is the Republic of Belarus, the rest are so.

[Sanche]

At the moment, the Russian Federation has one ally - this is the Republic of Belarus, the rest are so.

This is for the time being. The older generation, like me, is still somewhat loyal to the Russian Federation in some places, and the youth is already looking to the west. The process is relentless....

[Normann]

Most of my friends are quite loyal to the Russian Federation (35-45)

[Chief Officer Lom]

To create the South Pacific Alliance under the belly of the United States as an eternal land threat - this would put them in the position in which we and Europe have been for centuries, and make them spend more resources on direct defense and really tremble in their own skin, and not carelessly unleash another war over the ocean. Yes, and would reduce the US food supply. But we don’t have enough money and warships, even transport ships, to ensure a presence in South America similar to the American one in Europe. And a few missiles in Cuba are, of course, great, but only for the nuclear threat, and do not solve the unpunished looting of the United States on our continent. NATO is not going anywhere. And if we cooperate with China, then China will run the new alliance as the main supplier of finance and the fleet, and we will portray the role of England under America. However, perhaps better than nothing, although it's a shame of course. Everyone profukali themselves, protested and danced with the drunk EBN and labeled rhetoric.

[mag nit]

The drunk's successor removed the bases from Cuba to please Washington. That's really it - a double agent "Moth".

[Chief Officer Lom]

Removed bases from Cuba

There was electronic intelligence. Of course, the Americans were annoyed, but they did not frighten them at all.

[KCA]

There was once an interview on TV with a former officer in Lourdes, so after reminiscing about the past, he said - and who told you that there is no base there? It was simply rebuilt taking into account the development of technology, which required hectares of land and heaps of buildings, now it fits in one building

[singless]

and where do they call

[16112014nk]

with the Cuban Crisis of 1962, when the Soviet Union deployed nuclear missiles in that country

Somehow they forget all the time that the United States set up its missiles in Turkey even earlier. And the US thought it was okay. But rockets in Cuba in response are a violation of all norms and rules.
Of course, it would be nice to have missiles in Cuba or Nicaragua, but it is hardly possible. Our politicians and military will not dare. And given all the venality of our so-called "elite" ....

[flicker]

about Latin American countries with potential deployment of Russian missiles.

Hmm, a potential location for our missiles could be... the US.
Let's land troops, what will they do?
About 2 million Chinese, 60 million Latinos who will support?

[riwas]

Unfortunately, the Venezuelan constitution does not allow the deployment of foreign military bases on its territory, but Putin spoke on the phone "about something" with Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega.

[Sychev Vitalii]

Are we running into the 3rd World War? 20 or 27 million can we repeat??

[Cypa]

The United States will not let Russians into Latin America, just like in 1962. Neither Nicaragua, nor Cuba, nor Venezuela. Sea blockade. And if the USSR could not break it, then what can we say about modern Russia. You have to really look at things. Russia does not have the military potential that the USSR had.
Of course, dreaming is not harmful.

[CTEPX]

USA won't let Russians in

Oh well. The launcher has dried up))

[iouris]

And if you put S-400 and "Ball" in Cuba to defend deep-lying submarines?

[Alexander widerkehr]

How tired of your chatter. They would hit Washington on Moscow. And Vova would have stayed in the bunker. And you and I, we will all die

[Butchcassidy]

Sorry, time to go back. All the same, we actually "threw" many, including Cuba and the GDR.

A time to scatter stones and a time to collect stones.

[DrRey]

Apparently, Argentina is hinting that it is also not averse to hosting our missiles?