Military Review

CSTO countries unite armies to protect the Caucasus and Central Asia

21
The unstable situation in the Caucasus and Central Asia forces the CSTO countries to unite troops. The CSTO Secretary General Nikolai Bordyuzha stated this during the Coordination Meeting of the Chairmen of the CSTO Parliamentary Committees (Commissions) on Defense and Security of the CSTO Parliaments held in the National Assembly of Armenia, NovostiNK.ru reports.

As Bordyuzha noted, "taking into account the development of the situation in the world, today we must take even more effective and active measures in order to increase military cooperation."

"That's why the relevant proposals have been worked out. They concern, first of all, the improvement of the CSTO military organization. We propose the creation of CSTO troops, combining all existing components. These are peacekeeping forces, CRRF, bilateral groups, and rapid deployment forces in the Central Asian region, in these troops additionally enable and create collective aviation component, that is, aviation, which can: engage in the transportation of personnel and formations, if necessary, localize certain conflicts, provide combat cover for operations, "said ODBC General Secretary Nikolai Bordyuzha.

Recall that in Armenia, at the Bagramyan test site, from September 15 to 19, joint exercises of the CSTO “2012” Collective Operational Response Forces are held. In the final stage of the exercise, Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov will take part.

The military component of the CORF consists of formations and units of constant combat readiness. The total strength of the CSTO CRRF is estimated at about 20 thousand people, half of whom are Russian soldiers.

CSTO participants after the suspension of Uzbekistan’s membership remain Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia and Tajikistan.

The Collective Security Treaty Organization was created on the basis of the Collective Security Treaty, signed on 15 on May 1992 by the CIS member countries.
Originator:
http://www.rosbalt.ru
21 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alonso
    Alonso 19 September 2012 10: 56
    +5
    Good news. The southern borders, as the most unstable, must be reliably protected
  2. Armata
    Armata 19 September 2012 10: 59
    +5
    The Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Anatoly Serdyukov will take part in the final stage of the exercises. laughing On a white horse? He will not fit into the tank unequivocally. And as for the joint protection, this is so in the vision of the neighbors the Russians will protect, and they type support.
  3. Trailer
    Trailer 19 September 2012 11: 01
    +5
    I am against the CSTO. Why, yes, because, according to the agreement, the participating countries should support each other in the event of an attack on one of them by a third party. In the 2008 year, did the countries voiced above the country greatly help during the conflict with Georgia?
    1. Focuser
      Focuser 19 September 2012 11: 33
      +1
      Quote: Karavan
      the participating countries must provide each other with support in the event of an attack on one of them by a third party. Did they help Russia much in 2008 <...>?

      But what if Georgia attacked Russia or what?
    2. Bekzat
      Bekzat 19 September 2012 11: 50
      +2
      Maybe Russia said that it’s itself to cope with the presumptuous scum tie-eater.
    3. wax
      wax 19 September 2012 22: 51
      0
      Engaging other countries in a conflict would be crazy.
  4. Alonso
    Alonso 19 September 2012 11: 20
    +6
    But how would they help us?) The point here is not that we really need military assistance from the Kyrgyz or Tajiks. This means our military presence in the participating countries.
    1. Trailer
      Trailer 19 September 2012 11: 23
      +1
      Uzbeks have already shown the reliability of this agreement!
      1. Ataturk
        Ataturk 19 September 2012 11: 33
        +1
        Quote: Karavan
        Uzbeks have already shown the reliability of this agreement!

        Please tell me Kazakh? Muslim?
        1. Focuser
          Focuser 19 September 2012 11: 36
          0
          No, he's Zhenya Doroshenko) I apologize to both for getting into the conversation)
        2. Trailer
          Trailer 19 September 2012 13: 03
          0
          No, not that, not that, but, Kazakhstan is my homeland!
  5. Ataturk
    Ataturk 19 September 2012 11: 23
    +1
    CSTO participants after the suspension of Uzbekistan’s membership remain Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia and Tajikistan.

    Against whom are they going to defend Armenia? From Turkey or Azerbaijan? If from Turkey, then Turkey does not have land claims against Armenia, but vice versa. But even in this case, not Kazakhstan, not Belarus, let alone Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, will not fight against Turkey. I can explain why. It is also against Azerbaijan. So who are they scared of?

    But there is one BUT

    If Armenia decides to increase its land at the expense of you, for which it will receive the most backbards, then this is another matter.

    Now ask yourself a question, someone wants to rob someone and these countries will fight. That is, in a foreign war, for the priorities of others and in addition to immediately receive enemies from 3 countries. You need it?

    I thank God from the name of the CSTO, as in a joke, it takes laughter. Nobody will support anyone there! And did not support !!!

    There is Russia and that's it !!!!
  6. andrei332809
    andrei332809 19 September 2012 11: 26
    +1
    everything will be fine if it works out as planned. there are many who want to put sticks in wheels
  7. Alonso
    Alonso 19 September 2012 11: 31
    +3
    Trailer,
    So what now, let's give everyone else to custody of the United States?
    1. Focuser
      Focuser 19 September 2012 11: 33
      +1
      So I wanted to say the same thing! +
  8. anfreezer
    anfreezer 19 September 2012 11: 37
    0
    Karavan "I am against the CSTO. Why, but because, according to the agreement, the participating countries must support each other in the event of an attack on one of them by a third party. Did the above countries help Russia in 2008 during the conflict with Georgia?" " In fact, it will be interesting to see if there is an Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict (God forbid, of course), whether the CSTO forces will be involved or again to diplomats to puff off ... Or to check this structure for suitability, we must wait, for example, from the side China against one of the participants in the organization or the penetration into their territory not of a single gang of terrorists, but of a whole terrorist army.
  9. Kolyan 2
    Kolyan 2 19 September 2012 11: 39
    0
    Ataturk,

    Dear Ataturk, this is a defensive alliance, although I also do not care from him :))
    1. Ataturk
      Ataturk 19 September 2012 12: 25
      0
      Quote: Kolyan 2
      Dear Ataturk, this is a defensive alliance, although I also do not care from him :))

      + you

      In the CSTO, I see only Russia. There reality is Russia. Russia does not need the CSTO, Russia needs to return the USSR, but how, the question is interesting.

      Then no CSTO is needed.
      1. Ruslan67
        Ruslan67 19 September 2012 17: 56
        +2
        Omar! Are YOU ready to return to the union? Because then you will have to live with Armenia, although internal issues will be much easier to solve
      2. wax
        wax 19 September 2012 23: 11
        +1
        Russia, and not just Turkey, has its own geopolitical interests in this region. As for the CSTO member states, this is their reasonable choice, dictated by the development of real threats, the edge of which is directed precisely to the Russian underbelly through the Caucasus and Central Asia, but the post-Soviet states will become the first victims. And Azerbaijan will not be able to be on a horse, no matter how much he flirts with the United States and the West. Why Azerbaijanis and Uzbek leaders cannot understand that they will be smiling and helping only as long as they can be used against Russia. Indeed, in all the former Soviet republics indelible (at least for a couple of generations) Soviet stigma. They are under-states for the West, an instrument of anti-Russian politics, nothing more. It is sad when personal ambitions overshadow the strategic state view. Only Nazarbayev clearly and immediately put the strategy above tactics.
  10. NickitaDembelnulsa
    NickitaDembelnulsa 19 September 2012 11: 57
    +2
    It's time, in the future I would like to see in the CSTO a full-fledged adversary of NATO!
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 19 September 2012 12: 05
      +1
      Quote: NickitaDembelnulsa

      It's time, in the future I would like to see in the CSTO a full-fledged adversary of NATO!

      A full-fledged opponent of NATO is Russia, despite all the difficulties with rearmament. There are no others on this site, well, Belarus is all.
      1. Ataturk
        Ataturk 19 September 2012 12: 25
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        A full-fledged adversary of NATO is Russia


        That's right, and you can put an end to this.
  11. Bort radist
    Bort radist 19 September 2012 12: 37
    +3
    A military alliance is necessary with the signing of treaties, etc.
    He obliges and guarantees. These are political levers. How the benefits of getting in line. Such alliances are necessary to suppress separatism. Syria, Libya, does not teach anything to some proud representatives. I'm without a stake. Uncle Sam is not sleeping! Shit and ruin - that's their motto. Now is the time to unite.