The US Congress did not allow the US Navy to write off seven Ticonderoga-class cruisers at once

41

An attempt by the US Navy command to write off seven Ticonderoga-class missile cruisers at once failed, the US Congress did not approve such a sharp reduction in the American fleet.

The US Navy will decommission five Ticonderoga-class missile cruisers as part of a program to optimize and reduce maintenance costs. The fleet intends to redirect the saved funds to the construction and purchase of new warships of the destroyer and frigate types. Ships built in the 80s-90s of the last century will be decommissioned. After withdrawal from service, it is possible to transfer the cruisers to the US allies or partners.



Despite the fact that the congressmen "hacked" the decommissioning of seven ships, the withdrawal of even five Ticonderog from service can be considered a small victory for the American fleet. The thing is that the military for about 10 years has been trying to write off some of these aging cruisers. Initially, plans were generally announced to withdraw 13 ships from the existing 22, then their number dropped to 9, in the spring of this year seven were announced, but only five were succeeded.

Reasons for the decommissioning of guided missile cruisers weapons Ticonderoga types are voiced differently, but most often the US Navy states that they doubt their reliability and ability to perform combat missions due to obsolescence of the equipment. Against this background, arguments are given that it is better to write off the "old" ships, and use the saved funds to build new ones.

The timing of the withdrawal of ships from the US Navy has not yet been announced, most likely this will happen next year. It is possible that the decommissioned cruisers will replenish the fleet of some country capable of maintaining such ships. Otherwise, they will be sent to the storage base.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Two
    0
    14 December 2021 08: 03
    Didn't find someone to sell, along the way ...
  2. +3
    14 December 2021 08: 04
    To write off and sell them to Ukraine, if you want to ruin the country, give them a battleship, I don't remember who said. good
    1. +2
      14 December 2021 09: 32
      If I'm not mistaken - Otto von Bismarck and the speech was just about the cruiser hi
      1. +5
        14 December 2021 10: 06
        “If you want to ruin a small country, give her a cruiser ...”

        Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill.
  3. 0
    14 December 2021 08: 07
    Interestingly, they will sell them to Ukraine or give them away for nothing?
    1. +2
      14 December 2021 08: 24
      Quote: 75Sergey
      Interestingly, they will sell them to Ukraine or give them away for nothing?

      When did they give something away just like that? Perhaps in Afghanistan. No, here such a deal fell through! We wanted 7, but at least 5 feet! And the Congress will definitely not prohibit "aid to Ukraine".
    2. +1
      14 December 2021 09: 52
      Have you seen "Brother 2"? Everything here is just like that, except for money.
    3. +4
      14 December 2021 10: 10
      Quote: 75Sergey
      Interestingly, they will sell them to Ukraine or give them away for nothing?

      Ukraine does not have the money to simply refuel such a ship once. bully
  4. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  5. +1
    14 December 2021 08: 22
    It is possible that the decommissioned cruisers will replenish the fleet of some country capable of maintaining such ships.

    There is such an incomplete, it will not be able to maintain, but will put them at the "wall", and will flaunt and frighten the most powerful fleet in Europe.
  6. +8
    14 December 2021 08: 26
    Jokes about Ukraine and Tiki are not funny. All the same - the URO cruiser.
    Ukraine can handle 2-3 cruisers in terms of maintenance, but Tiki can do things wrong. Serious ships.
    This is not Getman Sagaidachny (Project 1135), there will be no jokes here.
    1. +7
      14 December 2021 08: 32
      Quote: Bradley
      Jokes about Ukraine and Tiki are not funny.

      they are inevitable
      they could have been predicted after reading the title of the article
      Quote: Bradley
      All the same - the URO cruiser.

      agree with you. that is why they will not be in the Black Sea. it is a question of the security of the Russian Federation.
      1. +3
        14 December 2021 08: 38
        agree with you. that is why they will not be in the Black Sea. it is a question of the security of the Russian Federation.

        I totally agree with you!
    2. -1
      14 December 2021 08: 54
      .

      Bradley ....Jokes about Ukraine and Tiki are not funny. All the same - the URO cruiser. Ukraine can handle 2-3 cruisers in terms of maintenance, but Tiki can do things wrong. Serious ships

      The US Navy says they have doubts about their reliability and ability to perform combat missions due to the obsolescence of the equipment.

      We must assume that their sailors know what they are talking about, unlike us. Ukraine will pull them ..... what will it pull? hi
      1. -1
        14 December 2021 11: 03
        The US Navy says they have doubts about their reliability and ability to perform combat missions due to the obsolescence of the equipment.

        Someone bothers to carry out repairs and give it to someone for a pittance?

        We must assume that their sailors know what they are talking about, unlike us. Ukraine will pull them ..... what will it pull? hi

        On your budget. Plus, the Americans will help with loans.
        1. 0
          14 December 2021 21: 17
          "Someone bothers to carry out repairs and give it to someone for a pittance?" What is the economic joke of such an action?
      2. 0
        14 December 2021 21: 15
        [quoteUkraine will pull them ..... what will it pull? ] [/ quote] Well, how on what? On the straps, like a burlack!
    3. +1
      14 December 2021 15: 26
      2-3 cruisers Ukraine will pull in maintenance

      will not pull ... they have 90 percent ready-made "Ukraine" and rotted away at the outfitting wall ...
      it's not only ships and weapons, it's also infrastructure ... it's billions! Navy expensive toy - beyond the means of the Galician rogue
    4. 0
      14 December 2021 21: 20
      "Jokes about Ukraine and Tiki are not funny. All the same - the URO cruiser." Exactly! This is a serious weapon that you need to know how to use. I'm not even talking about the weapons of the cruiser, try to train an electrician ...
    5. 0
      14 December 2021 22: 12
      Pfff. Whoever will supply them with even the old equipment worth a billion, and even with cruise missiles. This is almost the same as donating an aircraft carrier with planes.
  7. +11
    14 December 2021 08: 28
    Congress is against such a large-scale dough cut !! you have to be more modest)
  8. +5
    14 December 2021 08: 53
    Unifies the striped fleet, the berks will become the main warship until the middle of the century, and maintenance costs will be reduced. We need to take this approach into service and build ships in a large series.
    1. mvg
      +2
      14 December 2021 10: 51
      build ships in large series

      Dreaming. You give a lot of ships, completely different. This is the motto of our Navy. We have only RTOs of projects 6-7, even such monsters as 1143, 1144 and 1164 were built in such a way that they were strikingly different from their "fellow-one-project partners". They even got involved in different GKs. Not to mention the smaller ships.
      And contemporaries 22350 will also be built
      1. 0
        14 December 2021 22: 15
        Well, the construction of one ship takes a lot of time, parts there can easily become obsolete and change to newer ones, I upgrade if necessary.
        1. mvg
          0
          15 December 2021 10: 17
          there parts can easily become obsolete and change to newer ones, I upgrade if necessary

          Not in our version. As was the ancient S-300P (Fort, Fort-M) and it is. As were the Daggers, so they stand. AK-630 is generally a dinosaur. P-500/700/1000 are, in general, classmates.
          1143, 956 - boilers from the time of Novik, and
          And in time - let's remember 22350 with its Polyment-Redoubt and 855 Ash. We built it for 13 ++ years, did the filling change a lot? Something not very good. Maybe it was not a bobbin?
          1. 0
            3 January 2022 06: 12
            Frigates, which somehow were not frigates, have changed well during their creation, the project has changed several times.
            1. mvg
              +1
              6 January 2022 11: 05
              frigates that are somehow not frigates

              It is the frigates and not a cent more. If you want to classify a 4,5 kTn ship as rank 1, then look at the real destroyers: 052D, Berk, SeJun, Akitogo .. And Gorshkov is very far from, say, the European Horizons. And in terms of displacement up to Danish frigates.
              PS: Otherwise, like Iran, you can call corvettes destroyers.
              1. 0
                7 January 2022 04: 07
                Why are you measuring ships now by displacement? What is it for? One Gorshkov can sink the entire AUG entirely.
  9. 0
    14 December 2021 09: 00
    Was it not these idiots who aimed at Banderostan?
  10. -3
    14 December 2021 09: 23
    They are planning something against China! China has overclocked with its shipbuilding program. Congress in its anti-Chinese hysteria has already begun to count every rusty laiba. If the first Tikanderogs already have fuel tanks flowing into the corridor of systems and not outside, you will not get off with patches there.
  11. 0
    14 December 2021 09: 34
    but I like how Congress "saves" American taxpayers' money! the national debt is growing by leaps and bounds and the congressmen frantically cling to the remnants of the former greatness ... the old pelvis eat money every day;) I wonder what the daily maintenance of these ships flies into to the leaky American budget?
  12. +1
    14 December 2021 09: 59
    Can Congress legislation prohibit ships from sinking?
    1. 0
      14 December 2021 13: 51
      good super comment
  13. 0
    14 December 2021 09: 59
    Someone on the Black Sea coast is probably already letting solyunki on these decommissioned cruisers :) In the land of eternal dreams, they hardly think about the fact that keeping one such steamer costs half of the budget of the Square. Yes, it doesn't matter, but what kind of races will begin if the blacks give the chubaty at least one such steamer.
  14. +1
    14 December 2021 11: 17
    [quote = mvg] [quote] build ships in a large batch [/ quote]
    Dreaming. You give a lot of ships, completely different. , / quote]
    Yes, we have at least one type of corvettes in a series of 30 units. [Quote = GAndr] Someone on the Black Sea coast is probably already putting solyunks on these decommissioned cruisers :) In the land of eternal dreams, they hardly think that keeping one such steamer is half of the budget square. Yes, it doesn’t matter, but what kind of races will begin if the blacks give the chubatians at least one such steamer. [/ Quote]
    They will not be able to serve them financially, not to buy them.
  15. +1
    14 December 2021 12: 10
    The United States is held captive by the interests of its arms industry oligarchs.

    (Automatically translated from English. Below is the original commentary in English)

    The United States are prisoner of the interests of their military industry oligarchs.
  16. 0
    14 December 2021 12: 11
    Well, all 5 cruisers will receive Kiev for border protection!
  17. +1
    14 December 2021 13: 05
    Ticonderoga has problems with the hulls. The admirals, apparently, wanted to write off the most problematic ones, until they fell apart on the go. And the politicians did not allow them. We stock up on popcorn and Pepsi, an epic battle of "toad and viper" is brewing)))
  18. 0
    14 December 2021 20: 12
    RIM-162 ESSM his interesting racket, like 50g easily withstands overload, it will not intercept hypersonic?
    1. 0
      14 December 2021 22: 28
      Yes, they just do not always intercept in excess of sound, they somehow generally have few exercises to intercept target missiles, even very few and not all of them are successful.
    2. 0
      15 December 2021 01: 41
      striped flag don't forget to kiss before bed
      1. 0
        15 December 2021 13: 32
        Oh, nafig, he's all in your saliva, and you sleep with him, and I'm a squeamish guy.