Military Review

USA slapped Israel with a resounding slap in the face (Haaretz, Israel)

25
USA slapped Israel with a resounding slap in the face (Haaretz, Israel)Here's an old joke. In the middle of the supermarket, the child was lying on the floor and, without ceasing, he was yelling with a good mat. No persuasion acted on the little crooch. Mother was in despair. Buyers were pretty annoyed by the incessant noise. All this lasted until the guard came up, he bent over the child and whispered something in his ear. And a miracle happened - the child immediately calmed down and stopped screaming. “What did you say to him,” the astonished attendees asked, “What magic words did you whisper to this troubled baby?” “Everything is very simple,” the guard answered, “I told him that if he didn’t shut up this minute, I would slap him with such a crack , that his head will fall off.

Hillary Clinton did not whisper anything into the Israeli noisy "child." She just slapped him a loud slap. It was expected. “We do not set exact deadlines for Iran,” the Secretary of State said in an interview with the American channel Bloomberg. “We believe that negotiations with Iran are the best way to prevent Iranians from creating a nuclear weapons».

You do not need to be a special expert in diplomacy in order to understand to whom (and in connection with which) Mrs. Clinton's words were intended. She spoke rudely and unequivocally. It was the only way to make the state with hearing problems understand what they want from it.

Clinton's words were not intended for Tehran, but for Benjamin Netanyahu. Let us translate her statement from a diplomatic language to a universal one: Israel will not present an ultimatum to the United States, Israel will not dictate to Washington what lines it should draw - “red” or “green”.

The time has come, Clinton made it clear that Israel will learn the following lesson: the United States has its own policies, its own interests and its own deadlines for the implementation of certain tasks. And all decisions on these issues (who would have thought!) Are made in Washington, not in Jerusalem.

Netanyahu should not portray surprise. After all, it was he who managed to turn the international confrontation with the Iranian regime, more recently perceived as a threat to the whole world, into an exclusively Iranian-Israeli conflict. From the point of view of Netanyahu, the colossal international efforts to mobilize support for unprecedented harsh sanctions against Tehran are worth nothing.

If this is so, Hillary Clinton makes it clear, let Israel fight with Iran alone. On health. The United States does not intend to participate with Israel (at least at this stage) in this idiotic game. The USA, Clinton concludes, has not yet exhausted diplomatic solutions to the problem.

What then does President Barack Obama mean when he says that the United States guarantees Israel’s security? If he is not even ready to install the "red", the forbidden line? Where is the guarantee that at the right time he will send planes here. And what is it all about - “right time”? When does it come?

It is time to understand: the contradictions between Israel and the United States are much deeper than the question of the timing of the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. Clinton’s statement suggests that both states have a different understanding of what the “Iranian threat” is.

Apparently, we are talking about the fact that Washington does not believe in Tehran’s intentions to create nuclear weapons. At best, Clinton is ready to agree that uranium enrichment to 20% can serve as an indicator of such intentions, but not real efforts in this direction. "We carefully monitor the actions of the Iranians, because their words are always at odds with the case," - said Clinton.

This formula also applies to the US system of relations with Israel. This, in fact, is the American security guarantees. The United States seeks to protect the state of Israel ... from itself. Or, to be more precise, from the Israeli Prime Minister. The United States does not believe the Israeli estimates regarding the alleged number of victims of the Iran-Israel conflict.

The government of Israel claims that this amount will be relatively small. The United States believes that the Israeli attack is not able to stop the development of Tehran’s nuclear project. Worse, the Israeli attack will only strengthen the motivation of the Ayatollah regime to acquire its own atomic bomb. The US foresees a bloody war in the Middle East, in which Israel and its people will be the main target. Washington is most afraid of the fact that the United States will be forced to wage this war instead of Israel.

Netanyahu forgot that the US is not an Israeli colony. This Israel depends on the support of the United States, which has taken on the role of patron of the Jewish state, despite the tremendous price that they have to pay for it. The conflict over the Iranian problem can cause an irreparable blow to relations between the two states.

The American supermarket security guard hopes that the slap he slapped the Israeli screamer would be enough. And if not? What if Napoleon, sitting inside Netanyahu, wins over common sense?
Originator:
http://cursorinfo.co.il/
25 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Genera
    Genera 19 September 2012 07: 16
    +1
    Did the Americans, after their military frauds, understand that their lord also rewarded them with his tongue in order to use him to conduct a dialogue. Or are they just waiting for the situation in the world to heat up to the maximum ???
    1. Yarbay
      Yarbay 19 September 2012 07: 22
      +5
      Quote: Genera
      Did the Americans, after their military frauds, understand that their lord also rewarded them with his tongue in order to use him to conduct a dialogue. Or are they just waiting for the situation in the world to heat up to the maximum ???

      That is unlikely!
      I think in the simplest way, the amers understand that the enemy is not simple, but the nose is picking!
      Surely, the current administration has coordinated its position with the Jewish lobby, or at least with the influential part!
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 19 September 2012 07: 56
        +2
        Quote: Yarbay
        Surely, the current administration has coordinated its position with the Jewish lobby, or at least with the influential part!

        Pivet Alibek, only an influential lobby is thirsty for warriors, and therefore Clinton cannot be trusted in more than one word. This is just an attempt to prove himself peaceful and relieve himself of responsibility for further events. They will arrange the drafting themselves and start to boggle, and for sure everything is already agreed and it remains only to wait for the next meanness.
        1. Yarbay
          Yarbay 19 September 2012 08: 05
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Pivet Alibek, only an influential lobby is thirsty for warriors, and therefore Clinton cannot be trusted in more than one word. This is just an attempt to prove himself peaceful and relieve himself of responsibility for further events. They will arrange the drafting themselves and start to boggle, and for sure everything is already agreed and it remains only to wait for the next meanness.

          Hi Sanya!
          Quite possible!!
          They do not smell of peace there!
          Moreover, the vice president is the representative of the lobby and one of the most influential !!
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 19 September 2012 08: 34
            +2
            Quote: Yarbay

            Moreover, the vice president is the representative of the lobby and one of the most influential !!

            Yes, there is not only the vice president, everyone is tied up in the lobby and stained with blood so that you don’t get washed away. America needs a warrior otherwise she needs a kirdyk, but in the case of a warrior she needs kirdyk too, probably Obama doesn’t have enough beer in his new bunker under the White House delivered, that’s slow.
    2. Fox 070
      Fox 070 19 September 2012 07: 31
      +5
      Quote: Genera
      Did the Americans, after their military fraud, realize

      I don’t think they understood anything. Most likely, old Hilary did not like the tone that the Israelis demanded from America for concrete action with regard to Iran, and since Mrs. Clinton is not burdened by excessive diplomacy, she simply barked (which is very in her spirit) at the Israeli prime minister. I think that the reaction of international Judaism will be very quick and completely unpleasant for the current administration.
      The spiders in the bank began to bite and this is very good news !!! Good luck to them with all my heart ... good
      1. Yarbay
        Yarbay 19 September 2012 07: 44
        +4
        Quote: Fox 070
        I think that the reaction of international Judaism will be very quick and completely unpleasant for the current administration.

        I think there are also support groups for this or that solution!
        Quote: Fox 070
        The spiders in the bank began to bite and this is very good news !!! Good luck to them with all my heart

        Dear Felix, I don’t think so!
        Hardly a squabble!
        It’s possible that it’s all for looking away !!
        The latest large-scale exercises of the Russian army in the Caucasus say a lot!
      2. baltika-18
        baltika-18 19 September 2012 13: 52
        0
        Quote: Fox 070
        The spiders in the bank began to bite and this is very good news !!! Good luck to them with all my heart ...

        As for the squabble, I doubt, most likely another diplomatic twist. Well, and another question: why do the leaders of all major countries necessarily come to Israel and put on a bale on their head, go to the wailing wall?
    3. Vadivak
      Vadivak 19 September 2012 07: 46
      +3
      The Government of Israel claims that this number (of victims) will be relatively small

      Let the rulers initially include themselves and their families in this small amount, and then calculate how many more ordinary people should die
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 19 September 2012 07: 59
        +3
        Quote: Vadivak

        Let the rulers initially include themselves and their families in this small amount,

        Vadim, it’s not possible they love themselves and the bunkers have been prepared quite durable, and commoners, save who can and who didn’t hide the government is innocent hi
        1. Vadivak
          Vadivak 19 September 2012 08: 30
          +2
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          and the bunkers prepared quite durable,


          Yes, Alexander is like everywhere else, the value of those who start a war is always greater than those who will be cannon fodder
  2. Trailer
    Trailer 19 September 2012 07: 41
    0
    The time has come, Clinton made it clear that Israel should learn the following lesson: the US has its own policy,

    HORSE! Americans report to a piece of land in the desert of the Middle East. Surviving - a superpower!
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 19 September 2012 08: 02
      +1
      Quote: Karavan
      HORSE! Americans report to a piece of desert land

      This patch in the desert controls the entire US financial system and holds them very tight - Jewish lobby money rules the capitalist world hi
      1. Fox 070
        Fox 070 19 September 2012 08: 11
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        This patch in the desert controls the entire US financial system.

        Greetings, Alexander! Yes, that there is the United States - almost the entire world financial system is under their control through the IMF and other international financial institutions. "We say a banker - we mean a Jew ...". request
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 19 September 2012 08: 29
          +3
          Quote: Fox 070
          Yes, that there is the United States - almost the entire world financial system is under their control

          Hi Felix, I’ll recount the money in my wallet again laughing Intrusion of the problem is that politicians love money very much, and if you want to get money, go ahead and strike Iran hi
          1. Fox 070
            Fox 070 19 September 2012 09: 33
            +2
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            politicians love money,

            Without a doubt! It was this factor that was fundamental to the implementation of the Arab Spring plan. All Western politics revolves around the "golden calf". The activities of the leaders of states have ceased to be aimed at improving the quality of life of the peoples of our planet, and have been reduced to a banal robbery of resources and making money. After all, how simple it is - if someone has what you need, you declare him an enemy of democracy and then calmly rob, under the pretext of caring about the rights of the population to a decent life (I have never heard a more idiotic explanation in my life). And it doesn't matter that the people you robbed are no longer making ends meet - the main thing is that they have become "free". Here's just a question: What did you free these people from ??? People have to answer this question themselves and no one likes the answers that come along with the realization of what happened.
            Here are just politicians do not care about the answers - the money is in your pocket ...
  3. Odessa
    Odessa 19 September 2012 07: 55
    +3
    Haaretz again exaggerates. This is not so much a slap in the face, but from the series, the dear ones scolded, just amused. They exchanged, playing with friendly head slap, and not the first year.
    The Iranian issue: an angry exchange of accusations between Israel and the United States Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a real fuss about US ambassador Dan Shapiro regarding the position taken by the US administration on how to counter the Iranian threat. This was announced by the head of the intelligence committee of the House of Representatives, Mike Rogers.
    According to a Republican congressman in an interview with the WJR-based radio station in Detroit, the clash between Netiyahu and Shapiro occurred in late August, when the head of the Israeli government received Rogers arriving in Jerusalem. The US ambassador accompanied the politician to the meeting.
    According to the interviewee, the conversation turned into an exchange of accusations between the head of government and the ambassador. Very soon, Netanyahu and Shapiro, who, prior to his appointment to Israel, was part of Barack Obama’s inner circle and was responsible, in particular, for relations with the Jewish community of the United States, began to cry, and the situation got out of control.
    "The Israelis do not believe in the seriousness of the statements of the American administration about the readiness to use any means to prevent Tehran from receiving a nuclear bomb. Iran also does not believe in this, and therefore continues to develop. If the United States does not outline clear boundaries, Israel will attack Iran," he.
    1. Yarbay
      Yarbay 19 September 2012 08: 13
      +2
      Quote: Odessa
      Haaretz again exaggerates. This is not so much a slap in the face, but from the series, the dear ones scolded, just amused. They exchanged, playing with friendly head slap, and not the first year.

      I think so too!!
      Obama is not such a strong-willed person to have an independent role in such matters and make decisions!
      It seems to me that more of a decision is made by Joe Biden, not Obama, especially if you remember when Biden was the chairman of the foreign policy committee, Obama was a member of the same committee and often Biden took his protege on his trip abroad !!
      1. Karish
        Karish 19 September 2012 19: 39
        0
        Quote: Yarbay
        I think so too!!

        Alibek, good evening!
        Haaretz is an ultra-left-wing newspaper, I can’t give an analogue of the Russian one, well, let's say if Alkseeva would publish a newspaper.
        Everything that she writes can be safely divided into 4 and, more generally, can be called into question. 65000 - circulation. They read mainly the left-liberal part of society. In general, in my opinion, a vile newspaper for representatives of sexual minorities. laughing
    2. Vadivak
      Vadivak 19 September 2012 08: 32
      +3
      Quote: Odessa
      It’s not so much a slap in the face, but from the series, the dear ones scold, only amuse themselves.


      As an option, they played their own, and then backstage the banquet ...
  4. svs
    svs 19 September 2012 08: 05
    0
    all these public and official statements are just the tip of the iceberg, unfortunately we can never see the whole picture, and from such a small part of the information we can come to any conclusion about the situation ... like in the parable about the three blind men and the elephant.
  5. Arkan
    Arkan 19 September 2012 08: 07
    0
    Objectively, no one needs Israel for a long time (it is too expensive an ally for the United States and is no longer the only one in the region, for the Europeans it is a new competitor in the arms market (and not only), and in the case of Iran, Israel has greatly confused the plans of the United States ( Iran is now needed precisely as a "threat" without which the deployment of missile defense systems in Europe can hardly be called preparation for an attack on Russia). As for American Jews, American banks and the Fed are not doing so well now, they are now even without Israel there is something to negotiate with the US government, I think in this situation American Jews will be "more" Americans than Jews. Let's wait for the reaction of Israel (too far they were "carried off the road," let's see where they will get rid of).
  6. aktanir
    aktanir 19 September 2012 08: 27
    0
    Anything needs to be done with Iran, for indeed one day they will actually get a nuclear bomb, and then, hell knows what they will do with it.
    1. Arkan
      Arkan 19 September 2012 08: 36
      0
      aktanir,
      What can they do with her?
      1. Rumata
        Rumata 19 September 2012 18: 35
        0
        Quote: Arkan
        What can they do with her?

        For example, they will be able to demand a revision of the division of the Caspian, and if earlier they could be ignored, then they will not be able to deal with nuclear weapons, just as they will not be able to do anything about the annexation of the territories of Azerbaijan under the slogan of uniting a "divided people", for example. Following Iran, 100% of the Saudis will begin to create nuclear weapons, and possibly Azerbaijan.
    2. bairat
      bairat 19 September 2012 08: 52
      +2
      Yes, they won’t do anything with this bomb, Israel will only eat less.
      The United States now has many allies in the Persian Gulf, and starting a war with Iran means blocking their oil export, somehow the Iranians will dodge and a couple of tankers will sink.
      1. Rumata
        Rumata 19 September 2012 18: 37
        0
        Quote: bairat
        They won’t do anything with this bomb.

        Russia. in which the missile defense system as such does not exist, it is simply obliged to be afraid of the option that in the future all the same they can do something.
  7. volcano
    volcano 19 September 2012 09: 58
    +1
    US is not an Israeli colony

    Fresh tradition, but hard to believe.

    And all this does not mean that Israel was indicated in its place and in which case he would be left alone.

    It is rather like annoyance and frustration because someone (Netanyahu) opens his mouth too much and opens his tail too early.
  8. Averias
    Averias 19 September 2012 12: 17
    0
    Other, how do you feel about the fact that Iran already has nuclear weapons, and all this fuss (enrichment of uranium, etc.) is only a trump card in Iran’s hands. I have the impression that the United States also suspects the presence of nuclear weapons in Iran.
    1. Arkan
      Arkan 19 September 2012 14: 33
      0
      AveriasNo, Yao has no Iran.
  9. baltika-18
    baltika-18 19 September 2012 13: 41
    0
    Where are they without each other, poor Hilary. wassat
    1. Odessa
      Odessa 19 September 2012 18: 45
      +3
      baltika-18,
      Where are they without each other, poor Hilary

      You probably don’t know, a few months ago I posted a photo from the wedding of my daughter H. Clinton. The wedding took place according to the chuppah. If she was not Jewish (especially since the Jews have nationality by mother), she would not have been one rabbi for the chuppah I didn’t allow it. And so the wedding was played in the traditions of Judaism.
      1. baltika-18
        baltika-18 19 September 2012 19: 17
        0
        Quote: Odessa
        You probably don’t know, a few months ago I posted a photo from the wedding of my daughter H. Clinton. The wedding took place according to the chuppah. If she was not Jewish (especially since the Jews have nationality by mother), she would not have been one rabbi for the chuppah not allowed. And so the sigral wedding

        Hilary was not interested in it, and so Barak fell under a hot hand. Although I am not surprised, many with a bale on a head against the crying wall made an oath of allegiance.
      2. Karish
        Karish 19 September 2012 19: 43
        0
        Quote: Odessa
        If she was not a Jew (especially since Jews have a nationality by mother), not one rabbi would have allowed her to be a chuppah. And so the wedding was played in the traditions of Judaism.

        Odessa woman, you probably just forgot about the reformist trend in Judaism (very strong in the USA). Where both women rabbis and tefillin impose and marry homosexuals. - In Israel, this is not real, in the states - is another matter. Clinton’s husband is a Jew. Hilary herself - of course not.
  10. BARKAS
    BARKAS 19 September 2012 14: 52
    0
    Nothing really happened. The Israelis hurried up at the right time. The Americans themselves will give the go-ahead, and so they say don’t get ahead of the dad.
    1. Arkan
      Arkan 19 September 2012 16: 25
      0
      BARKAS,
      For Israel, time plays an important role - after Iran tests its nuclear weapons, it becomes untouchable.
      1. Karish
        Karish 19 September 2012 19: 44
        0
        Quote: Arkan
        For Israel, time plays an important role - after Iran tests its nuclear weapons, it becomes untouchable.

        Moreover, for everyone and Russia, including
        1. Arkan
          Arkan 20 September 2012 03: 26
          0
          Karish,
          Nonsense. The Jews made the porridge - they should be able to clean up, but if the United States subscribes, let them eat together. By the way, if you don't believe what Haaretz writes (I don't know why, almost everyone already knows about the spoiled relationship between Obama and Netanyahu) - I will quote to you the Deputy Press Secretary of the White House Josh Ernest: "The US President made it very clear that the red line for Iran is that it should not have nuclear weapons" (said yesterday). This means that Israel is very strong it is necessary to interest the United States so that they would get involved in a serious war with unclear consequences. And what can Israel offer other than tales that we are de "outpost of civilization and democracy in the Middle East"?
          1. Karish
            Karish 20 September 2012 06: 46
            0
            Quote: Arkan
            .By the way, if you do not believe what Haaretz writes (I don’t know the truth why, almost everyone already knows about the damaged relations between Obama and Netanyahu)

            Why I believe and know. From the very beginning, their relationship left much to be desired. I do not agree with the consecration of events. The Haaretz sanctifies them in his ultra-left vein. Any news can be presented in different ways and inflated from the molehills.
            Quote: Arkan
            And what does Israel have to offer besides the stories that we are de "outpost of civilization and democracy in the Middle East"?

            In general - this is not the same. Nu, at worst, drones can sell laughing
            1. Arkan
              Arkan 20 September 2012 16: 41
              0
              Quote: Karish
              N u at worst we can sell drones

              To the Americans? ))) You are a dreamer.