Strategic aviation of the Russian Federation made a long-term flight over the Black Sea

Strategic aviation RF made a long flight over the Black Sea. Its participants were two Tu-22M3 bombers and escort aircraft.

This information came from the press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

They noted that it was a planned event. The military department recalled that long-range aviation of the Russian Federation is periodically present over the waters of the Black and Baltic seas, as well as the Pacific and Atlantic oceans.

The aircraft were over neutral waters and operated in strict accordance with international law and other regulations.

During the flight, strategic missile carriers accompanied the Su-27 fighters, providing them with protection. The aircraft accompanying the bombers are subordinate to the Air Force and Air Defense Association of the Southern Military District. In total, the flight lasted at least five hours.

It is noteworthy that the "strategists" of the Russian Aerospace Forces appeared over the Black Sea waters shortly after the unsuccessful statement of the head of the German defense department Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer about the need for military containment of Russia, especially in the Baltic and Black Sea. After her words, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation summoned the German military attaché, where he was handed a note of protest.

Comments

[Alexander 3]

(after the unsuccessful statement of the head of the German defense department Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer about the need for military containment of Russia, especially in the Baltic and the Black Sea.) - Our military reminded the forgotten ones that this is also our zone of influence.

[Rushnairfors]

The shaykovka is swaggering though!

[Alexander 3]

The peasants need to fly where they have not flown for a long time, and show the young.

[GUARD]

Yes, here I read, just recently, an article, either on "Voenmat", or on "Political Review", that ordinary Germans and business were scared twice: the first after the statement of the Ministry of Defense of the Federal Republic of Germany, the second, stronger fright after a quick and harsh reaction from Shoigu and Lavrov.

[Starover_Z]

Quote: Alexander 3

Our military reminded the forgotten ones that this is also our zone of influence.

And since the Americans say that they need to control the Black Sea, then let them wait for the Russian Aerospace Forces to "control" the Gulf of Mexico!

[Cananecat]

The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation summoned the German military attaché, where he was handed a note of protest.

And I had to write in chalk on the Reichstag. "There will be nowhere to come next time."

[knn54]

Putin promised Germany and all Europeans additional supplies of gas and electricity:
"Calm down - we won't let you freeze, How much fuel we need - we will supply so much!"
As a sign of "gratitude" to the West, through the mouth of the AKC, in a response speech, they said that there was no limit to the arrogance of the Russians, She suggested
- the need for military containment of Russia, especially in the Baltic and Black Sea.
Up to the use of nuclear weapons against Russia,

[kind]

This is her "personal" opinion, formed in the United States. All the same, adequate Germans are the majority. Such statements of corrupt politicians. states are quarreling countries. for your own benefit.

[Butchcassidy]

Quote: Good

This is her "personal" opinion, formed in the United States. All the same, adequate Germans are the majority. Such statements of corrupt politicians. states are quarreling countries. for your own benefit.

The current Minister of Defense cannot have "his own" opinion on military issues. She may have her opinion about sauerkraut and painting. No more.

[Stepan S]

nevertheless adequate Germans, the majority.

Historians say that during the Second World War, most Germans on the territory of the USSR were also adequate. This did not stop them from burning villages.

[rocket757]

It is clear that the AKK is a duck, but its rhetoric can be picked up, there are plenty of such demoniacs there!
And yes, it's sad that they started talking about those arguments that should not be touched upon at all.

[S. Nikolaev]

Quote: knn54

"Calm down - we won't let you freeze

They will show off, we will remove the dash

[Xnumx vis]

Russian Sea! Aircraft Russian, fly where you need and when you need it. For diggers of the seas - During the early Middle Ages, Pontus Euxinsky was called the Russian Sea, just as the Baltic Sea was called the Varangian Sea,
The German Sea - the GERMAN or Northern Sea ... This is for the general development of the sea-digger.

[Egoza]

Quote: 30 vis

This is for the general development of the digger of the seas.

Ouch! This is not for them! They here cannot understand the difference between opera and ballet, they demand to translate everything into MOV, and you give them history and geography!
But it's great that our pilots showed up in the sky. And then the United States has already rolled out its lip, wanted to expand its influence in the Black Sea. How are the tales of A.S. Pushkin cannot be remembered. USA - like a greedy old woman, swung herself at the Goldfish!

[Keyser soze]

During the early Middle Ages, Pontus Euxinus was called the Russian Sea

What have you swallowed that the fantasy was so played out. It can be seen that relatives with the Ukrainians ... did they dig together? In the early Middle Ages, you didn't even have a state at all, but they already dug the sea ...

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: Keyser Soze

During the early Middle Ages, Pontus Euxinus was called the Russian Sea

What have you swallowed that the fantasy was so played out. It can be seen that relatives with the Ukrainians ... did they dig together? In the early Middle Ages, you didn't even have a state at all, but they already dug the sea ...

Russian Sea - the name in the X-XIV centuries of the Black Sea. Russian Sea
the name of the Black Sea, which is found in Russian chronicles describing the events of the 9th-15th centuries, as well as in Arabic sources of the 10th century. Are you Svidomo? Or was it the Elite? Nice man! Learn to read books. You will learn a lot of interesting things,. Or other than Harry Potter and Gone with the Wind, there are no more books!

[Keyser soze]

Learn to read books.

I have two master's degrees, and I read calmly in three languages. And for sure, dear, give me a link to this Arab source or a link to it from an authoritative historian, not from your alternatives. Otherwise, you remain a digger of the Black Sea, like your Ukrainian cousins.
The second is the Early Middle Ages, which is the period from 476 to 1000. You, at the end of this and that period, Kievan Rus appeared, and you already wrote down the Black Sea to the Russians ...
You need to learn the basics nice person. Otherwise, the Crimea will have to be returned to the Greeks. The mothers of Byzantium seized the holy lands and littered the show-off, and the show-off he was Evksinsky ...

[Xnumx vis]

It makes no sense for you to prove anything. But for the sake of the development of Svidomo diggers and Zryailites, as well as the Bulgarian debaters - I will give a few quotes. - "Why did Pontus Euxinsky become" Russian "?

The main problem that has bothered researchers of this issue for many years is the lack of an unambiguous explanation of the reasons why the Greek Pontus Euxine (“Hospitable Sea”) suddenly became “Russian”. Traditionally, in popular science literature, one can find the point of view according to which this hydronym appeared as a result of the frequent raids of the Rus (Varangians and Slavs) into this region, as well as an echo of the existence of the Russian Tmutarakan principality centered in Taman in the 12th-4th centuries. Sources, however, as a rule, do not mention the Tmutarakan principality, and they certainly do not say that the "Russian" sea began to be called precisely because of the existence of this state formation. For example, Ibn Said wrote: “There are islands in this sea inhabited by Rus, and [therefore] it is also called the Ar-Rus sea [ie Russian] ". The islands inhabited by the Russians and located in the Black and Azov Seas are also reported by other Arab authors of the 1th-2th centuries. It is possible, of course, that by "islands" the Arab geographers meant the Taman Peninsula, on which the Tmutarakan principality was located, however, this does not follow directly from the sources. Nevertheless, some geographers, for example, al-Masudi and al-Idrisi, did write about the frequent raids of the Rus from the Black and Azov Seas, and also mentioned the existence of the “Russian River” (Arabic “nahr Rusiya”), which can be identified with the Kerch Strait or the mouth of the Don. "One thing is beyond doubt: European, Arab and Jewish geographers of the 3th-2th centuries strongly associate the Northern Black Sea region with the presence of ancient Rus there. at that time the name of the Black Sea was “Russian Sea.” "First, a little background information on the history of the names of the Black Sea. It was called by different names. Pontus Aksinsky, Scythian Sea, Trebizond, Cimerian, Tauride, etc. Among these names is also found "Russian Sea". In historical sources and literature of the X-XIV centuries. 72230424 such references can be found. In Arab sources it is mentioned 497887 times, Jewish - 497887, French - 600, German - 72230424, and Russian - 498116 times. The most famous is contained in the Tale of Bygone Years. "And the Dnieper will flow into the Pontus sea with three zherela, the hedgehog sea with the word Ruskoe ..." ... https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/amp_amp/498116/XNUMX/XNUMX_original.jpg

[Keyser soze]

I'll give you some quotes

This is not a quote - this is a link to a livejournal article. You might as well link to the Disneyland website.

[Xnumx vis]

What can I say ... Don't you like the Russian Sea? To your health. Seek and find the Bulgarian Sea ... Good luck ... The Black Sea became the "Russian Sea". Ibn-Khordadbeh (Ibn-Hardadbeg), who wrote in the 40s of the IX century. his "Book of Ways and States" ("Book for the Knowledge of Ways and States"), which served as the basis for a whole series of later Muslim writings about Russia, mentions, as something well and long known, as something ordinary, "the way of the merchants of the Rus, and they belong to the Slavs" who sell furs of beavers and black foxes and swords "from the further ends of Slavonia to the Ruma Sea". Ibn-Khordadbeh calls the Black Sea the "Rum Sea". So, the Rus spoke Slavic, otherwise they, the Rus, would not have been understood by their fellow Slavs in Baghdad!

In Ibn Al-Fakih, who wrote at the very beginning of the 46th century, we find confirmation of the story of Ibn Khordadbeh. XNUMX

And, finally, Al Masudi in his "Golden Meadows /> (940s) speaks of the Knitas Sea," which is the Russian Sea; no one except them (Rusov) swims on it and they live on one of its banks "- 47. - A. Ya. Garkavi, uk. cit., pp. 125-138 - 46. V. V. Bartold, uk. sot., pp. 22, 23.- A. Yu. Yakubovsky. On Russian-Khazar and Russian-Caucasian relations in the 5th-463th centuries Izv. of the USSR Academy of Sciences, series of history and philosophy, vol. III, No. XNUMX, p. XNUMX.

This is how the Black Sea turns into the Russian Sea and remains so throughout almost the entire Middle Ages ("taga Ruaciae", "maro Eutcnum") .48. P.I.Shafarik. Slavic antiquities. M., 1848, vol. II, book. III, adj. XIX, p. 70. All this, directly or indirectly, as statements or assumptions, confirms our judgment about the antiquity of Russian navigation on Russian The (Black) Sea first.

[Keyser soze]

Search and find - the Bulgarian sea ..

And we don't need to become a laughing stock. Dig it yourself or together with the Ukrainians. It is enough for us that you write in the Bulgarian alphabet and speak 10th century Bulgarian mixed with the local Slavic Koine ...
Pancake sailors ... clowns ... Russian sea, I'll die with laughter ...

[Xnumx vis]

Quote: Keyser Soze

Search and find - the Bulgarian sea ..

And we don't need to become a laughing stock. Dig it yourself or together with the Ukrainians. It is enough for us that you write in the Bulgarian alphabet and speak 10th century Bulgarian mixed with the local Slavic Koine ...
Pancake sailors ... clowns ... Russian sea, I'll die with laughter ...

Brother! Don't die !!! Live! Russians still love you unlucky ones, Live happily. Yes, Prince Oleg nailed a shield on the gates of Constantinople having arrived there on ships .. And the Russians freed you from the Ottomans! There was such a Russian general Skobelev ... Have you forgotten? Or is it funny too? Isn't it true? Laughing for no reason is a sign of foolishness. This is what my people say.

[Xnumx vis]

good luck, brother.

[Keyser soze]

Yes, good luck and on you

[rocket757]

Strategic aviation of the Russian Federation made a long-term flight over the Black Sea

Not strategic distances, but the region is important, the dominance of our aviation, this is the argument that makes the enemy think - does he need it, provoke, aggravate ???
True, it should be borne in mind that the enemy is experienced, powerful and will strive to turn the tide in his favor!
It's not clear who will win ... the forces of counteraction will have to be built up.

[Observer2014]

Strategic aviation of the Russian Federation made a long-term flight over the Black Sea

Oh Lord, how many circles over the Black Sea have they wound, if not a secret? ?

[White man]

and they just do in a position on cruising to describe a circle over the Black Sea without getting into the neutral?

[bk316]

without getting into neutrals?

In the sense of not getting into neutral? The Black Sea is mainly international waters ....

[White man]

I made a reservation, sorry, db. "not neutral". You could have guessed for yourself

[bk316]

Ah .. I didn't guess. Of course it can - a hefty circle of 20 km. Of all our aircraft, perhaps only a storm could not ...

[White man]

I don’t know, unfortunately, the maneuverability characteristics of strategists at cruising speeds, so I was a little bit sick. On the other hand, a "long flight" on the sea, which is at a maximum of 580 by 1150 km, sounds strange.

[UVB]

Strategists are Tu-160 and Tu-95MS, and Tu-22M3 are long-range bombers.

[Aag]

Quote: UVB

Strategists are Tu-160 and Tu-95MS, and Tu-22M3 are long-range bombers.

And the majority does not care, if only "Urya!" ... It's sad ...
The only way I can justify the position of such people (we exclude bots, -they are at work) is a NATURAL desire to live in peace, without shocks. Sometimes, like an ostrich, - "There will be no war!" guide to the formation of the RF Armed Forces !!) (In general, it seems that some of the Armed Forces have learned to speculate on this, IMHO).
Patiently, thoughtfully I will listen to all the arguments ...

[Region-25.rus]

And the majority does not care, if only "Urya!" ... It's sad ...

and not only young people, but also "respectable" gray-haired uncles (((

[Region-25.rus]

Tu-22M3 are long-range bombers.

+ missile carriers)) When I was in our 2nd regiment, there was a Tu-22M2 in the division. Although, if you suspend missiles from special warheads ... as our communications chief (Lieutenant Colonel Mikhalchenko) said, "we can burn out half of Japan."

[Shket53]

Greetings ... When a regiment of long-range soldiers was stationed in Vozdvizhenka, the Japs sat exactly on the priest's ... it is now that they have become infuriated. And when the long-distance pilots began to fly, the Japs' blood froze in their veins.

[Region-25.rus]

Greetings! I mean "Stone Creek" (Mongohto)! In 93, they were still flying with might and main! My unit was located a kilometer from the takeoff. When "backfires" on afterburner took off oh and a roar. And the spectacle is simply unforgettable!

[Lara Croft]

Quote: UVB

Strategists are Tu-160 and Tu-95MS, and Tu-22M3 are long-range bombers.

They were ahead with comments, not everything is so bad on VO, moderators, "there is still something to work on." Maybe when a boom with refueling in the air (now prohibited by the treaty) appears on the Tu-22M3 and it will become strategic ...

[Aag]

Quote: Lara Croft

Quote: UVB

Strategists are Tu-160 and Tu-95MS, and Tu-22M3 are long-range bombers.

They were ahead with comments, not everything is so bad on VO, moderators, "there is still something to work on." Maybe when a boom with refueling in the air (now prohibited by the treaty) appears on the Tu-22M3 and it will become strategic ...

Not special ..., but it seems that in addition to the barbell, for the transition to the rank of strategists, at least a number of conditions are needed: plans for combat use (with plans, developments, training l / s, training equipment, etc., etc.). NS....)
Hmm. Yes, excuse me, equipment, planes are needed, in sufficient quantities (with trained crews, technicians, infrastructure, weapons, ... household appliances, preferably ...))).
... The rest, according to the application plans ...)))

[Retvizan 8]

It is time for the West to get out of the habit that the times have passed when they could take Russia to show off with just gallant statements.
Vaughn Trump, even having driven his aircraft carrier groups to the shores of North Korea, could not scare them, and where are these poor wretches, even when the whole European pack is going to bark at Russia in our fig.

[Butchcassidy]

It would be necessary to conduct similar exercises off the coast of Germany.

[svp67]

It is noteworthy that the "strategists" of the RF Aerospace Forces

So far, the Tu-22M3 cannot be classified as a full-fledged strategist, even our "partners" have invented a separate class of "Eurostrategists" for it .... And it would be more impressive if they walked as a link, and not as a pair, and even if it were a whole squadron. ..Shock and Awe

[Bez 310]

Quote: svp67

And it would be more impressive if they walked as a link, and not as a pair,

"Big planes" fly not in "teams", but in detachments.

[svp67]

Quote: Bez 310

"Big planes" fly not in "teams", but in detachments.

?????? You have been wrong for a century

[Bez 310]

Quote: svp67

You were wrong for a century

Well, where did you get this aplomb?
You don't know, you'd better keep silent.

[Mole13]

Quote: Bez 310

"Big planes" fly not in "teams", but in detachments.

And the bomber link? Or does this refer to tactical bombers and not strategists? I'm not a pilot, that's why I'm asking.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Mole13

And the bomber? Or does it refer to tactical bombers

All right.
And the Tu-22m3, Tu-160, Tu-95, Tu-142 have a detachment. The squadron consists of squads.

[Mole13]

Quote: Bez 310

detachment

Well, okay. Although I would not divide the divisions according to this principle, I see the "link" as something that is part of the "squad". For example, the pioneer squad included pioneer units. So in aviation, I see the "links" that are included in the "detachment", and then - squadrons, regiments, divisions. I am for the reform in aviation, I swear by God ...

[Bez 310]

Quote: Mole13

So in aviation, I see the "links" that are included in the "detachment", and then - squadrons, regiments, divisions.

The Wrong Sandwich.
"Link" for small planes, "detachment" for "large" ones.
The flight commander is the captain, the detachment is the major.

Quote: Mole13

sore, by God ...

Well, don't worry ...

[Mole13]

Quote: Bez 310

"Link" for small planes, "detachment" for "large" ones.
The flight commander is the captain, the detachment is the major.

This is the "aircraft size" layout, but why? It can be formed according to the quantitative composition, without reference to the type of aircraft. The "nth" quantity is a link, the "nth" quantity is a detachment. After all, there is no such thing that a division is exclusively in DA, and brigades (they are not in aviation, but I am for an example) in tactical aviation. And the ranks - for God's sake, let the captain command the flight, and the major command the detachment.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Mole13

This is the "aircraft size" layout, but why?

Sorry, but I'm not the one to ask these questions.
But the logic is there - in the Su-35 flight there are only 4 pilots and 4 technicians (engineers), and in the Tu-142 detachment of only flight personnel there are about 30 people.

[76SSSR]

Quote: Mole13

And the bomber link? Or does this refer to tactical bombers and not strategists? I'm not a pilot, that's why I'm asking.

I am not a pilot either, but it would be absurd to make the difference between a flight and a detachment depend on whether they are tactical bombers or strategic. Although Bez310 is a retired naval aviation officer, he may know better. Although I still do not understand, what does the detachments have to do with it? And whether the detachments ... The eternal antagonism of soul and body ...

[Mole13]

Quote: 76SSSR

it would be absurd to make the difference between a squadron and a squadron dependent

Agree. But little depends on us. At one time, I sought reforms regarding the methodology for preparing specials. units to perform tasks in the conditions of the subtropical and tropical zones, it was still at <top secret, read to destroy and forget>, but they showered with formal replies, they say, not up to you now, sit on retirement and write your memoirs ... Okay, at least I tried - already a lot ...

[eehnie]

Very likely, the most likely replacement for the Be-6/12 last active units in Crimea are units of Tu-22 from the newest variants in the reserve. It would mean a different way to work, with a very important improvement in the capabilities.