In the US Press: Modern American Naval Officers Become Managers

30

The last naval battle in which the US Navy took part was the invasion of Okinawa in mid-1945. Then there were, of course, separate naval operations, but only of a supporting nature, and not against enemies of such a level as imperial Japan. Ground Forces, Marines, aviation participated in hostilities in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries, but the fleet itself does not have such experience (with the exception, perhaps, of the transfer of troops), and this worries the American authors.

Of course, writes The Hill, American submarines at one time "played cat and mouse" with Soviet submarines, but this underwater confrontation cannot be called full-fledged naval battles. No American admiral commanded fleetthat would fight other fleets.



Meanwhile, the global political environment is forcing the United States to watch with increasing vigilance the actions of China and Russia. In recent years, China has developed into a strong maritime power that may well launch an invasion of Taiwan. In this case, the United States, if it decides to intervene for the island, will probably have to participate in naval battles against the modern and well-armed Chinese People's Liberation Army fleet.

Meanwhile, The Hill is concerned about the level of readiness of the US Navy for real naval battles. So, the fire at the USS Bonhomme Richard showed that even with such an emergency situation, the fleet can cope with difficulty. What will happen in the event of a large-scale conflict with naval battles?

The Hill writes about a range of issues in the Navy. Moreover, this is at least the second article in the last few days in the same publication.

First, junior officers are reported to complain of declining sailors' morale, combat readiness, and leadership skills. Second, there is an obvious funding problem. Third, the command does not check the operational readiness of the combat units of the US Navy.

The lack of continuity has also become a serious problem: there are no more officers in the fleet who would have participated in their past in real naval battles. Naturally, this circumstance also affects the quality of personnel training and its fighting spirit: there is no one to inspire sailors with their example, to broadcast their knowledge. Modern American naval officers are turning into managers who are not yet known how they will behave in real naval battles. It is noted that naval officers are used to considering the US Navy invincible, but the whole problem is that the last victories date back to bygone dates.

According to The Hill, one of the ways to solve this problem is a radical reform of naval education, which will improve the situation with the level of training of junior officers. And, of course, more time and attention should be devoted to naval exercises.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    26 October 2021 09: 23
    Where was the last purely naval battle?
    England and Argentina are only in my memory.

    Looks like this, according to the author, is the most advanced maritime powers)
    1. +2
      26 October 2021 09: 38
      ...... The United States, if it decides to intervene for the island, will probably have to participate in naval battles against the modern and well-armed Chinese People's Liberation Army fleet ......

      It is highly doubtful that there can be any naval battles for Taiwan. And in this case, the United States will be at a disadvantage for its fleet.
      1. -1
        26 October 2021 09: 55
        Yes, they will enter the port of Taiwan and cover them with their chest, assuming China will not hit them. Catch up with PMCs, the UN will stink. The no-fly zone is unlikely to be muddied, the straits to block the same.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +2
      26 October 2021 11: 42
      This is a problem for all military personnel.
      In European armies in general, the collapse is complete.
      And take the large (once) colonial powers - Belgium, Holland, Portugal, Spain. Nowadays little things are pot-bellied, 5-10 outdated small troughs - that's the whole fleet. And the former ruler of the seas, Great Britain, crawled away not far from the above.

      There are no naval battles. Where to get them from?
      There are no major land operations.
      There are no air battles, neither large nor small.
      The use of military aircraft (bombing) in Syria or Iraq, Afghanistan, after all, cannot be called massive either.

      And it’s good that no.
      Let them train while smile
      1. 0
        27 October 2021 18: 17
        Yes, and Serbia should not be forgotten, which was bombed more.
  2. -4
    26 October 2021 09: 23
    At least they have voyages, campaigns and maneuvers, without war, their mouths are full of worries, but we do not even have that.
    1. 0
      26 October 2021 09: 42
      And what about us: follow the cruises of the ships of the navy, in my opinion, they do not stop in different fleets.
      1. +5
        26 October 2021 09: 54
        Quote: frruc
        And what about us: follow the cruises of the ships of the navy, in my opinion, they do not stop in different fleets.

        And what to watch out for? Last year, the most massive exercise consisted of as many as 30 ships of all classes and the same number of aircraft, ON ALL fleets! Most of the hikes are single voyages and there were several dozen in number. In fact, exits from the base.
        1. 0
          26 October 2021 09: 59
          There are problems in the Navy, as elsewhere, but it is impossible to say that nothing is being done.
          1. +2
            26 October 2021 10: 09
            Quote: frruc
            There are problems in the Navy, as elsewhere, but it is impossible to say that nothing is being done.

            I do not argue, but just with the same size of the fleet due to the intensity of experience, the sailors will have more, and here the fleet is larger and the intensity is higher. Accordingly, the number and experience of seafarers is higher.
            1. +1
              26 October 2021 10: 23
              The Russian Navy is always in the role of catching-up (if not worse), the lag is too strong (in naval watercraft and aviation). And the US Navy has always been dominant and has received attention. We seem to pay more attention to the submarine and icebreaker fleet. Maybe this is correct at this stage.
              1. +2
                26 October 2021 14: 58
                Everything seems to be logical - the United States is almost an island state with two absolutely safe neighbors, and the Russian Federation is a mainland state with a large land border, a large number of neighbors, not always friendly and the bulk of the population lives far from the coast (and this is quite non-standard). It's just that our cities are not on the shores of the seas, but on the banks of rivers historically.
        2. +3
          26 October 2021 11: 43
          Last year, the most massive exercise consisted of as many as 30 ships of all classes and the same number of aircraft, ON ALL fleets!
          people simply either forgot or do not know what it is real teachings! For example Ocean-70.
          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Океан-70#:~:text=«Океан-70»%2C%20также%20«Океан-100»%20или%20просто,масштабными%20в%20мировой%20военно-морской%20истории
          1. -2
            27 October 2021 18: 28
            She declared herself as a sea power with a naked booty among the people. If we compare the standard of living of a people, with another people from another power. Just don’t write to me that whoever doesn’t feed his own aircraft feeds someone else’s. At that time, being a power was an end in itself. And the main goal is to defend the fatherland, not by number, but by skill, if anyone has forgotten Suvorov.
            1. -4
              27 October 2021 20: 52
              Didn't live pay-to-pay in the 60s, who put a minus or his parents. Looks like it is more important to armament 60s for the sake of pride to be a power, where the armament was in excess of a reasonable number to protect the fatherland than the ordinary people. Now his pride rusts in the form of abandoned tanks, ships, submarines, airplanes, etc., into which the sovereign generals buried the people's money.
              1. +3
                27 October 2021 21: 02
                Didn't live pay-to-pay in the 60s

                No, we lived without pay in the 90s. Without any Cold War, "huge" army, etc. 5 million unemployed (1995) and underemployed, rampant banditry, military conflicts in the Russian Federation and the CIS countries, refugees ... It was a merry time.
  3. +1
    26 October 2021 09: 32
    Funding problems. Their defense budget is so gigantic. And at the same time, the obvious underfunding of the fleet. It’s on what scale the admirals are sawing money, that there’s no money left for the fleet. Or on all sorts of programs of multiculturalism, tolerance and other garbage, founding a lot of funds is spent.
  4. +3
    26 October 2021 09: 48
    Lack of continuity was also a serious problem.
    But the transgender received the rank of admiral, albeit an officer corps of the US Public Health Service. Maybe it is worth, relying on new trends, to appoint all blacks and LGBT people to command and main naval specialties, and whites and traditional cooks and stewards. Maybe then the combat readiness will increase?
  5. 0
    26 October 2021 09: 49
    Second, there is an obvious funding problem.

    For UWB, this is the first thing.
  6. -1
    26 October 2021 09: 50
    If everything in the article is true, then everything is fine!
    1. +1
      26 October 2021 10: 12
      Quote: Cat Alexandrovich
      If everything in the article is true, then everything is fine!

      Shhhh ... don't scare away lol
  7. 0
    26 October 2021 10: 00
    manager of the running manager of the warhead top manager (commander) ?? .. and the sailors are clerks ??? ....... a madhouse !!!!!!!!
  8. +5
    26 October 2021 10: 14
    Everything is like ours, only not in the navy, but in general. The Chechen campaign, Ossetia and Syria are significant for politics, for the country, but the scale of actions is still too small.
    Yes, even the banal transition of Kuzi to Syria was a feat, 2 planes were drowned, tankers were driven. It is clear that this is better than nothing, but ...
  9. 0
    26 October 2021 10: 36
    We benefit from such a state of the drugs of their fleet. Only we also have enough defective managers who hold high positions in companies and the state as a whole.
    It is generally necessary to equate the word "manager" with a curse, and censorship at that.
    Example: "Hey, manager, get out of here!"
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. 0
    26 October 2021 14: 53
    The United States has so much money that it can afford life-size simulators in the amount of an entire fleet and emulate fires, damage to the ship, the order of the command, as well as combat clashes with the enemy fleet.
  12. 0
    26 October 2021 21: 09
    So, the fire at the USS Bonhomme Richard showed that even with such an emergency situation, the fleet is coping with difficulty.
    Letting the ship burn out almost to the bottom is now called - to cope with the difficulty ?! belay
  13. -1
    27 October 2021 14: 14
    All bullshit, the main thing is that the manager is effective! )))
    1. 0
      28 October 2021 04: 57
      Quote: pomor23
      It's all bullshit

      And our shipping company is full of girls - from the third to the first mate! wink
      1. +1
        28 October 2021 12: 30
        The first thing, the first thing - the steamers! Well, the girls, and the girls - then! laughing
        1. 0
          28 October 2021 12: 34
          The profession of a sailor has become unpopular and not prestigious ... Guys, after completing a training course, go to the sellers! So they began to recruit girls. How many my men faced with them at work - no complaints.