Knights of the Hundred Years War: Captains, Bowers and Frank Archers
"Charles VII announces the creation of the Frank-archers." Miniature from the manuscript "The Vigil of Charles VII", 1484 National Library of France
The book of the prophet Jeremiah, 6:23
Military story countries and peoples. Needless to say, the calamities that befall a person or the people as a whole only sharpen his mind and mass consciousness, which in the blessed years floats with lazy fat. The same thing happened in France. The defeat at the Battle of Agincourt, which fell on the French like a thunderbolt in the middle of a clear sky, made many of them look completely differently at the military system that has developed in their country and wonder if it is good?
Is chivalry outdated?
There were people, for example, Alain Chartier, who publicly began to declare that chivalry had outlived its day. That knights in war see only a source of profit.
Jean de Buel in a manuscript entitled "Le Jouvencal", which he created in the middle of the XNUMXth century on the basis of personal experience, wrote that a military man should stand above all others in society. But at the same time, it is not amateurs who should be engaged in military affairs (and the same knights-feudal lords were just that), but professionals, masters of their craft. But the inertia of public consciousness was so great that chivalry, even now, after all the defeats it had suffered, still continued to retain its mystical halo. True, now there were more men at arms than the knights themselves, and they fought shoulder to shoulder.
More warriors of different social status appeared, and weapon they also became more diverse. In this miniature, an equestrian warrior uses an infantryman's weapon - a felchen (falchion), and a sword has always been a knight's weapon! "The novel about Alexander", 1338-1344 Bodleian Library, Oxford University
"Warriors-Flayers"
But now mercenaries played an increasing role in the war - the units of which were called ecorshers (ecorcheurs - flayers) and, apparently, they deserved such a nickname with their behavior. Usually they gathered in "companies" - a kind of military units, which included the following people: mercenary soldiers from other countries, including the British, who were left without work (such as usually, huddled in a detachment, robbed everyone in a row); equally shameless robbers - forest robbers, "embarked on the warpath" and ... peasants who adjoined both.
This is how the ecors came out of the forest, and ... the inhabitants of the villages begged them for mercy. But they did not always receive it. Especially women. "Ancient History", 1360-1400 National Library of France, Paris
The same peasant would like to be hired for military service to the king, but ... did not know who to turn to. And so, if a similar detachment went through his village and not only robbed, but also offered to replenish their ranks - many agreed to this! The main difference between the XNUMXth century ekorshers and the XNUMXth century detachments was that they were not fought against, and many of their commanders were even former royal officers, who were then recruited again. Such was the time when military freelance existed ...
Illustrators are now increasingly depicting warriors fighting in helmets without visors. That is, there is a saving of money and the hope that it is he who will pass the "death cup". And someone, yes, was lucky, but someone was not, and the enemy's sword pierced right into his face! "Ancient History", 1360-1400 National Library of France, Paris
The emergence of "free shooters"
Feudal recruitment continued to exist for the infantry.
Charles VII revived it in a new form with the aim of creating a large and reliable foot army, which would be under the control of the king, and turned the former city recruits into francs archers ("free shooters").
In 1448 and again in 1451, Charles VII issued decrees declaring that every 50 houses should exhibit one archer and one crossbowman, moreover, from men of good reputation, fit for military service due to age, health and skills in handling weapons. ...
Prisoner trade
The motivation to enroll in the franc archers was very different. Most of the soldiers went to serve either for money or for military booty, and the dream of every soldier (and this is very well shown in the novel by Conan Doyle "The White Detachment") was to capture a wealthy knight and get a ransom for him. The trade of captives even developed through special intermediaries, when the right to receive part of the ransom for the captives was transferred to them, if, say, the warrior himself could not or did not want to wait for the ransom paid in full.
The prisoners were bought both individually and in bulk. For example, the Florentine merchant Giovanni Vittore, received the lion's share of the income from such operations, in 1417 he bought many English captives from the Archbishop of Rouen and kept them, releasing them for a ransom sent!
Chivalry, however, did not yield positions. Judging by the miniatures in the manuscripts, the armor changed, and much, but the traditions of spear fights were still preserved. Guiron le Courtois, manuscript 1420, National Library of France, Paris
It's funny that, although almost half of France was occupied by the British, entire detachments of foreigners still fought on the side of the French crown, and even in the troops of Joan of Arc there were many such adventurers. For example, having set out from Sully against the British, she had under her command not only the patriotic French, but also the Scots Captain Hugh Kennedy, and the Italians Bartelomeo Barretta.
"Popular resistance" is a controversial issue
In Soviet times, textbooks on the history of the Hundred Years War said a lot about the fact that the British were driven across the sea by the people, inspired by Joan of Arc. However, the existence of "popular resistance" against the British, according to both British and French historians, is still controversial.
Yes, there is no doubt that the ordinary French did not accept the British occupation. For example, a folk song has come down to us, in which the peasants' call for war with the British sounds in a humorous form:
But a song is a song, but how can you really fight with a hoe with men at arms with swords in your hands? Not a word is said about this.
At the same time, the slightest oversight of the combatants - and the enemy's spear, slipping off the shield, pierced the cuirass of the armor with all the ensuing consequences! Guiron le Courtois, manuscript 1420, National Library of France, Paris
King Philip's reforms
However, changes in the French army began even before the Hundred Years War. Thus, King Philip V in 1317 reorganized his army. He sought to place the appointments of commanders of large formations and regions under royal control. At this time, the number of infantry in the French army outnumbered cavalry by three, or even four times.
Then in 1351, before the English invasion, the king issued a new "Regulation for the military people", in which he established that a captain or chevetaine could lead a unit of at least 25 men at arms under his banner. For such units, a new pay scale was introduced, which the Marshal of France had the right to update every two months.
King John's reforms
In the same year, King John decided to create the Order of the Star - a secular or, if I may say so, a purely royal order, similar to the English Order of the Garter. He hoped that this order would rally the military elite, and then the army would rally around it.
But the history of the Order of the Star came out very short. Most of the members of the order died at the Battle of Moron in 1352, but those who survived then died at Poitiers four years later.
Well, if the spears turned out to be useless, swords were used. It is interesting that shields gradually became more and more utilitarian, if they are decorated, then it is not at all the same as before. And their size is decreasing. And all because the armor of this time became much stronger and more perfect. It is interesting that the shields of both fighters are suspended on belts by the neck. Guiron le Courtois, manuscript 1420, National Library of France, Paris
The control system under John remained the same. He called upon barons and members of the lesser nobility as advisers, and seven Grand Dukes (or peers of France) formed the royal Privy Council. If necessary, not so well-born nobles could be invited to it. The army was subordinate to the king and constable of France, who commanded it when the king was absent, and supervised the spies and scouts. Nevertheless, he was accountable to the royal secretaries, and his main responsibility was ... to maintain discipline and direct the supply of the troops throughout the campaign.
We have already talked about the fact that hired parts - companies often had their own names. For example, there were the Compagnie de la Fortune, the Compagnie cle Margote, and the Compagnie Blanche. Ordinary people, however, did not care who robbed them, but at the same time, it was customary to blame everything on the enemy. Therefore, the "companies of robbers" were popularly called the British, Bretons, etc., and the detachments in which there was no commander of noble birth, usually "nobody's companies" and, of course, were afraid of them more than anyone else, since they did not obey anyone.
If a knight fell and could not continue the fight, they treated him like this: put a sword to his throat and ... demanded a ransom! All in the best robbery traditions. Only there, among the robbers, it was customary to say: "Your money, or your life, or your big fat wife!" Guiron le Courtois, manuscript 1420, National Library of France, Paris
Captain, Captain, smile!
That is why militias also gathered to defend the cities, the captains of which were appointed by the city magistrate. Two or three such captains, having gathered the militia, could even go on a campaign, although it is not entirely clear who then remained to defend this city itself?
But the desire to seize the prey was very great. And the captains with their men went to such "business" usually with joy. The magistrates paid their captains an annual fee by mutual agreement, but representatives of the nobility who arrived at the royal collection received payment from the marshals for exactly the number of days during which they served in military service. That is, according to feudal law, they served 40 days for free, and then the king had to fork out.
As always, military expenditures were very high, although, for example, at the beginning of the Hundred Years War, only the maintenance of the royal court cost the treasury 30 livres. It is clear that taxes on the army were collected from the peasants. And here's what is interesting: there was no smell of conscientiousness when collecting them. People were robbed, but no one wanted to pay for the army to protect them. The collection for the maintenance of the army in 000 and 1379 provoked such fierce resistance that this new structure was rejected for many years. And when the British devastated much of France, collecting taxes became especially difficult.
The captain of the Italian "gang" (as the companies were often called there) gives the order to start the campaign. The trumpets are blowing, the squire is ready to give the captain the helmet. Horse men at arms and infantrymen begin to move. One of the riders is a horse archer. There is also a crossbowman and an infantryman with a battle scythe. Miniature from the manuscript "Good civilians", Italy, 1373, Trivulziliana Library, Milan
First General Staff
King John's military reform was generally a failure, but it served as the basis for the reforms undertaken by his successors.
So, in 1374, a royal decree created something similar to the General Staff, which made it possible for the constable to appoint a lieutenant (deputy) and royal marshals to help himself, who in turn appointed four lieutenants to conduct a review of the convened troops. The retinue of the constable and the master of the crossbowmen (who also commanded all the infantry) were not subject to inspection.
Infantrymen became very important when it came to sieging or storming city walls. Here in this miniature we see how the French franc-archers bombard the walls of the enemy fortress, while other infantrymen climb the wall and destroy the masonry of the tower. "Chronicles of St. Denis ", 1380-1400. British Library, London
"I confirm my hand!"
Below all these senior officers were the captains of the companies, each of whom had a letter from the king and could command a troop of 100 warriors. They ensured the attendance of their subordinates for the review and were responsible for their behavior. Everyone who arrived for the review was subjected to a thorough check - weapons, armor, a war horse. And only if everything was as it should, the warrior was considered hired. Leave from service could only be obtained if there were good reasons. It was possible to replace the hired only with the consent of the captain, if he was called up to serve with the king, or if he was wounded or sick. Payment was made by chambras (chambre - room), that is, by divisions of the company. The captain received money for his retinue, and the royal treasurer gave money to all the other soldiers. Those who were literate put their signatures. The illiterate put up a cross, and then the royal treasurer wrote: "I confirm my hand!"
This is how the modern artist Christopher Rochero depicted the representatives of the military elite of France: on the left - the King of France John the Good, in the center - Eustace Ribermont, the royal standard-bearer at Poitiers, on the right - Geoffrey de Charnier, the standard-bearer of Oriflamme at Poitiers
Information