Israeli Defense Minister: Iran is on the verge of creating a nuclear bomb

The Israeli military came to the conclusion that Iran is on the verge of creating a nuclear bomb, and the existing methods of diplomacy cannot affect Iran's progress in creating a nuclear weapons... This was stated by the head of the Israeli defense department Benny Gantz.

According to the Israeli Defense Minister, in two to three months Iran will be able to produce enough material to create one nuclear bomb. The emergence of even one nuclear charge from Iran, according to Gantz, could lead to the beginning of a "nuclear arms race" in the Middle East.

At the same time, the existing diplomatic efforts will not be able to influence Iran's nuclear program, the Israeli politician said. This requires joint pressure from the United States, Europe, Russia and China.

The fact that Iran has almost accumulated the amount of enriched uranium necessary to create a bomb was also confirmed by the IAEA. Tehran itself does not comment on this information in any way, but earlier the country's leadership said that the nuclear program for Iran is "very important" and Tehran will not abandon its implementation even if all sanctions are lifted.

Meanwhile, Israel has a plan of action in the event of the emergence of a threat of nuclear weapons from Iran. As Beni Gantz said in the spring of this year, the Israeli military, if necessary, will launch a series of strikes on targets in Iran, even if they have to do it alone. Tel Aviv is ready to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons to destroy Israel, he added.

Comments

[Vladimir_2U]

Personally, I am more worried about the presence of nuclear weapons in Pakistan and India.

[Peak]

Quote: Vladimir_2U

Personally, I am more worried about the presence of nuclear weapons in Pakistan and India.

In general, it cannot but strain any expansion of the "nuclear club", but the point is that Iran, or North Korea, is simply faced with a choice - to have such weapons and means of delivery, or to be trampled underfoot.

[Shurik70]

the Israeli military, if necessary, will strike a series of strikes on targets in Iran, even if they have to do it alone

And after that they are outraged that Iran wants to destroy Israel

[Bat]

Quote: Shurik70

And after that they are outraged that Iran wants to destroy Israel

I am Azerbaijani. I watch how the Iranians help the Armenians. That is, no solidarity is not religious, not national. And the Armenians themselves say we have the same blood with the Persians, only the faith is different. This is one point. They invaded our territories in the Caspian Sea. They poke their noses in the Gulf countries too. Personally, I am for the fact that this Iran was dismembered into many countries.

You probably think white fluffy Persians ..... but no dear. They are hypocrites.

[Tank hard]

Quote: Yarasa

They stick their noses in and out in countries Persian Gulf

The very name of the bay sounds like an excuse for their deeds.))

[For example]

Iran is on the verge of creating a nuclear bomb

Same problem for me.
Any Soviet schoolchild will create a nuclear bomb.

The only question is the enrichment of Uranus 235.

And the second question is who gave the Jews this very Uranus235?

The Iranians themselves are trying to establish production.

But where did you get Israel? Have you bought it? Who sold?

[For example]

Quote: Yarasa

They poke their noses in the Gulf countries too.

The ancient, true name "Azerbaijan Strait"!

They dug it at the same moment when the Ukrainians dug the sea.

Quote: Yarasa

Personally, I am for the fact that this Iran was dismembered into many countries.

Persian cats will become Azerkots.
Peaches - Azerki.

Ban Persian carpets.

Yarasa, do you have any relatives living in Kuyev?

[bk316]

Any Soviet schoolchild will create a nuclear bomb.

But my deputy thinks he won't.
For reference, he is a nuclear physicist by training.

[For example]

Quote: bk316

But my deputy thinks he won't.

Perhaps this is why he is only a deputy, and besides, in an office that is engaged in another matter?

[bk316]

Perhaps this is why he is only a deputy, and besides, in an office that is engaged in another matter?

It is unlikely that at least he did not get knowledge from the Internet, but from special courses, and his diploma is red. And he graduated from MEPhI, not fence-building.

[Alex777]

Quote: For example

Iran is on the verge of creating a nuclear bomb

The only question is the enrichment of Uranus 235.
And the second question is who gave the Jews this very Uranus235?
But where did you get Israel? Have you bought it? Who sold?

Read it yourself in any way?

Nuclear Research Center in Dimona Heb. הקריה למחקר גרעיני is an Israeli research center.

Located near the town of Dimona.

Opened in 1964 year. The center conducts research in various fields of physics. In the period from 1957 to 1964, a heavy water reactor (IRR-2) was built on natural uranium with the assistance of French firms. About 36 Israeli and French workers participated in the construction of the 1500 km² area. The reactor power is 28 megawatts. In the 1970-ies with the help of France, he was upgraded.

Not under the control of the IAEA.

In 1986, Mordechai Vanunu, a former technician at the Dimona center who emigrated from Israel, provided the British media with some information about Israel's nuclear program. [1] The center is said to be used to produce weapons-grade plutonium; various sources provide information that the annual production is from 15 to 40-60 kg [2] [3], and that until 2003 Israel produced 510-650 kg of plutonium

[Iris]

And the second question, who gave this very U 235 to the Jews?
The Iranians themselves are trying to establish production.
But where did you get Israel? Have you bought it? Who sold?

Won at roulette.

[Bat]

Quote: Tank Hard

The very name of the bay sounds like an excuse for their deeds.))

and what did Bahrain displease you? Oman? Kuwait? these gulf countries .........

[For example]

Yarasa, why are you persistently looking for enemies around?

What does “Bahrain? Oman? Kuwait?” Have to do with it.

Who should they please and why ?????

[Bat]

Quote: For example

Yarasa, why are you persistently looking for enemies around?

Dear, I am not a sick person or someone who stubbornly searches for enemies. Do you think I enjoy the fact that we have lost guys in the war, that we are spending billions on weapons and so on? No. We were just unlucky with our neighbors. I repeat, I am ready to prove to you from the religious point of view that the neighbors are radishes and in general from all sides. Have you seen Armenian soldiers and tanks? All with crosses. What do they want to say by this? Crusade? Crusaders? But at the same time Shiite Iran lads. No dear, I am not looking for enemies, I want to get rid of enemies.

[For example]

Quote: Yarasa

Dear, I am not a sick person ...

Quote: Yarasa

... I am not looking for enemies, I want to get rid of enemies.

The last phrase calls into question the first.

[Bat]

Quote: For example

The last phrase calls into question the first.

Well, you know everything perfectly and break a comedy. It was not I who declared the Armenians to be enemies, but they themselves became. It was not I who declared hostility to Iran, but they themselves did everything.

[Tank hard]

Quote: Yarasa

and what did Bahrain displease you? Oman? Kuwait?

Yes, there are many countries.

Quote: Yarasa

These countries Persian bay ..

And there is only one bay.
In general, sometimes it is important to understand humor, hatred burns ...

[Babermetis]

Quote: Tank Hard

Quote: Yarasa

They stick their noses in and out in countries Persian Gulf

The very name of the bay sounds like an excuse for their deeds.))

Just don't try to talk like that in front of the Arabs! This is the "Arabian Gulf", not the Persian one.

[Tank hard]

Quote: Babermetis

Just don't try to talk like that in front of the Arabs! This is the "Arabian Gulf", not the Persian one.

And I was taught at school, in the USSR-In Africa, there are blacks, the Gulf is Persian. I have always considered the education given in the USSR to be one of the best. We were taught that way.

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Tank Hard

The very name of the bay sounds like an excuse for their deeds.))

And this question is very interesting.
All countries that are located along the Gulf call it the Arabian Gulf.
But Iran disagrees and filed a lawsuit on google and today there is no name on the maps until the trial ends.
In February 2021, Iran filed a note of protest to Russia that the Arabian Gulf was indicated on the map.

[Tank hard]

Quote: Vitaly Gusin

And this question is very interesting.

Above, I answered this question in my understanding, well, humor has not been canceled yet.))

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Tank Hard

Above, I answered this question in my understanding,

In general, you are right, this issue of change arose in the 60s of the last century, when the Arab countries began to gain independence and decided to eventually end the legacy of the Persian Empire.

[alch3mist]

Iran filed a note of protest to Russia that the Arabian Gulf was indicated on the map.

As far as you can find out, it was someone from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs who messed up on Twitter. Not surprising, considering what kind of shit MGIMO is now.

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: alch3mist

As far as you can find out, it was someone from the Foreign Ministry who messed up on Twitter.

This is an internal matter and we will never know.
February 08, 07:48 / Politics
Iran sends Russia a note of protest over the name of the Persian Gulf
https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/news/2021/02/08/856994-iran-napravil-rossii-notu-protesta

[Iris]

Interestingly, have they tried Sportloto?

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Iris

Interestingly, have they tried Sportloto?

This is serious in Sportloto, but after filing with the international court, Google stopped writing the Arabian Gulf.

[Iris]

Google stooped .. Than opened the possibility of filing counterclaims.
The case may end with a double name - modeled on the Falkland-Malvinas Islands.

[Shurik70]

Quote: Yarasa

They invaded our territories in the Caspian

I thought that Iran and Azerbaijan had excellent relations.
Azerbaijan once separated from Iran, and Iran did not punish the "separatists" for this.
Cultural, family and economic ties are strong.
Ilham Aliyev and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad call each other "dear brother" when they meet.
Iran supported Azerbaijan in the Karabakh conflict
I believe your opinion is individual, not the majority of Azerbaijanis.

[Alex777]

Quote: Shurik70

Azerbaijan once separated from Iran, and Iran did not punish the "separatists" for this.

Here you surprised me a lot.
Russia conquered part of Persia in 1828.
What does separatism have to do with it?

Azerbaijani-Iranian relations are distinguished by their special specifics. For many centuries, these two countries and two peoples were part of one state. The Russian-Persian wars that followed at the beginning of the 1828th century led in XNUMX to the fact that the Azerbaijani people remained on both sides of the Russian-Persian border. The Azerbaijanis themselves have deep historical and cultural ties with Iran and even common ethnic and social traits. The population of the countries mainly professes Shiite Islam, which directly influenced the formation of similar morals and customs.

Quote: Shurik70

Iran supported Azerbaijan in the Karabakh conflict
I believe your opinion is individual, not the majority of Azerbaijanis.

And here is a citizen Bat surprises strongly.
Let me just remind you: Ali Khamenei is an Azerbaijani.

[Flooding]

Quote: Alex777

And here the citizen of Yarasa is very surprising.
Just a reminder: Ali Khamenei is an Azerbaijani

key phrase

Quote: Yarasa

I am for the fact that this Iran was dismembered into many countries

and one of them would naturally be ethnically Azerbaijani
I think this option would be very interesting to Azerbaijan and Turkey

[Shurik70]

Quote: Alex777

Ali Khamenei - Azerbaijani

So I say.
Azerbaijan (with the exception of a small number of people) cannot wish Iran ill.

[Bat]

Quote: Shurik70

Azerbaijan (with the exception of a small number of people) cannot wish Iran ill.

I am an Azerbaijani and personally, not what I wish, I really hope that they will be smashed !!! God forbid !!! and I am sure they will blow it! but about the Azerbaijanian Khomeini, let him go ................. like his fellow Azerbaijanis ...

[For example]

Quote: Yarasa

let him go ................. like Azerbaijanis like him ...

It turns out there are wrong Azerbaijanis.
Yes, you, senor, are an ordinary fascist.

[Bat]

Quote: For example

It turns out there are wrong Azerbaijanis.

During the first Chechen campaign, there were officers in the Russian army who sold weapons to Chechens for vodka. I personally saw these footage. Well, what can you call those Russians who substituted their own?

Quote: For example

Yes, you, senor, are an ordinary fascist.

I accept it as a compliment. Thank you peace loving you are our

[Kapral Alphych]

Well, you are no different from such an "officer" either! If "fascism" is a compliment for you, then the best reward is a bullet for you.

[alch3mist]

It turns out there are wrong Azerbaijanis.

And not only. Perdogan, as far as I heard, is generally an Adjarian.

[bayard]

Quote: Yarasa

but about the Azerbaijanian Khomeini, let him go ................. like his fellow Azerbaijanis ...

There are several times more Azerbaijanis in Iran than in Azerbaijan itself (Aran), there not only ayatols, but also the ruling dynasty was Turkic.
The fact that the Iranians are not a gift and it is difficult to do business with them is hard to know firsthand - my friends tried to do business with them ... But I would not advise you to look for enemies among them, but you will try to play off your "elder brothers" by blood (Iran and Turkey), for this they may not pat on the head from both sides.
Or is the role of Tabaka so attracted to the old sick Sher Khan?

And the Armenians can whip nonsense about their relationship with the Persians as much as they want. , they now have the following situation - allies are needed. But there was no scent of kinship there.
The Armenians are the Jews of the Asurov tribe - one of the 10 tribes of Israel, taken prisoner during their conquest by the Asyrians.
Persians - Aryans (with a colossal Dravidian admixture: Iranians - Aryans, Pars / Farses / Persians - Dravidians (black-headed)). Aryan roots among the Iranians are visible in their nobility.
Armenians are Semites, although they like to pass themselves off as Assyrians.

Azerbaijanis (like almost all Turks) are a cross between Aryans and Dravids. Mainly through female blood - they took Dravidian women (initially), later - just mixing.

And you have a fighting enthusiasm because after the success in the recent war you can’t come to your senses. Although you should understand that you were given the opportunity to punish your old offenders. Exactly - they gave it.
For the Armenians deserve it.
But what did Iran do to you wrong?
Maybe he was going to bomb you?
Or did you provide your airfields for the Armenian aviation?
But Azerbaijan was going to provide such airfields for Israel - in order to bomb from the flight, with landing, refueling and suspension of weapons in Azerbaijan.
What airfields were you going to provide?
Abandoned?
Salyan?
Pirsagat?
... Sangachaly is unlikely - the road is nearby.
But both Salyan and Pirsagat (former airfields of the "school aviation" of the Armavir school) are conveniently accessible from the sea. And you can't attract too much attention ...
It’s good that it didn’t come to real bombing then ...

Do not look for enemies among neighbors, the real enemy will find you himself.

[For example]

Quote: Shurik70

Azerbaijan (with the exception of a small number of people) cannot wish Iran ill.

Cooperation in the military sphere between Azerbaijan and Turkey is specifically evil to Iran.

Why do we like pink glasses so much?

There are no centuries-old state traditions in the republics and cannot exist.
Republics were formed on paper a hundred years ago MAXIMUM!
And as a state, even 30 years ago.
And no one wants to admit their "youth". For them, all around are enemies who want to annex lands to themselves. As it was before.

Azerbaijan is the former territory of Persia (Iran)
Azerbaijan is the former territory of Russia.

Russia has demonstrated by its deeds that it is not going to return Azerbaijan to its possessions.

But the leaders of these 30-year-old states have a point of bench press.
They judge by themselves. The Karabakh massacre is proof of that.

So, that rose-colored glasses for friendship of peoples are the very thing!

There are more Azerbaijanis in Iran than in Azerbaijan. But Azerbaijanis in Iran consider Iran (Persia) as their centuries-old homeland.

The Turks simply "made" Aliyev. In the sense they cheated. Only Allah knows how to get out from under the Turks.

[Bat]

Quote: For example

Azerbaijan is the former territory of Persia (Iran)

The Azerbaijanis ruled Persia rightly. It is not just that we call part of Iran South Azerbaijan.

Quote: For example

There are more Azerbaijanis in Iran than in Azerbaijan. But Azerbaijanis in Iran consider Iran (Persia) their centuries-old homeland

Not Iran, but Persia. The name Iran appeared in the 20th century. And Persia until 1929 was ruled by Azerbaijanis for thousands of years.

Quote: For example

The Turks simply "made" Aliyev. In the sense they cheated.

this is your speculation))))

[Tank hard]

Quote: Yarasa

Not Iran, but Persia. The name Iran appeared in the 20th century. And Persia until 1929 was ruled by Azerbaijanis for thousands of years

So I always agree with those who say that the younger the state, the more ancient its history turns out to be. Please remember that the place of the Sumerians has already been taken.))

[Bat]

Quote: Tank Hard

Please remember that the place of the Sumerians has already been taken.))

Handsome. That's right) I ask you not to touch the Sumerians. This seat is already taken)

[For example]

Quote: Yarasa

The Azerbaijanis ruled Persia rightly.

That's right, and Russia was ruled by the Ukrainians.

[Kapral Alphych]

The Azerbaijanis ruled Persia rightly. It is not just that we call part of Iran South Azerbaijan.

And today you so simply propose to bomb your fellows? Rip, shed a sea of ​​blood and destroy thousands of lives? For what? Amuse the vanity of a bunch of donkey sex lovers?

[alch3mist]

It is not for nothing that we call part of Iran South Azerbaijan.

And no one calls Azerbaijan Northern Iran?

[Bat]

Quote: Flood

and one of them would naturally be ethnically Azerbaijani
I think this option would be very interesting to Azerbaijan and Turkey

I do not hide (my personal position), but I am in favor of RETURNING the ancestral lands of Azerbaijan. South Azerbaijan should return to Azerbaijan.

You want the same thing and do not you? why can't we?

[Flooding]

Quote: Yarasa

to RETURN the ancestral lands of Azerbaijan

you are substituting concepts
the ancestral lands of Azerbaijan are one thing
and the lands of the primordial settlement of Azerbaijanis are different
I am not very familiar with the history of Azerbaijan
but I think that you are writing about the return of something that never belonged to Azerbaijan as a state

[Bat]

Quote: Flood

you are substituting concepts
the ancestral lands of Azerbaijan are one thing
and the lands of the primordial settlement of Azerbaijanis are different

Dear, look who has been in control of Iran over the past centuries. If you need help I will help you with facts and international links. Not one Azerbaijani. Russian and foreign sources. 30-40 million Azerbaijanis live in Iran. They didn't fall from the moon, did they?

Quote: Flood

I am not very familiar with the history of Azerbaijan

this is normal and you don't have to know this, that's why I'm writing, if you want a couple of sources and facts I can post.

Quote: Flood

but I think that you are writing about the return of something that never belonged to Azerbaijan

Misconception. The source is indicated below (in the photo)

[Flooding]

everything you wrote above is clear to me
except for one - how does the Persian and then Iranian lands do the territory of Azerbaijan?

[Bat]

Quote: Flood

how does the Persian and then Iranian lands by the territory of Azerbaijan?

Good question.

In order to understand who is who, let's even leave aside that the Turks in Iran are in the majority ................. just read from any convenient sources about the Safavid Empire, about its nobility and read who the Qashqai and Qajars are, you will no longer have doubts.

[Flooding]

Quote: Yarasa

even leave aside that the Turks in Iran in the majority

why can't the Turks live in Iran?
why does justice in Azeri demand to take away its historical lands from Iran?

Quote: Yarasa

read from any convenient sources about the Safavid Empire

Safavid Empire, Safavid Iran, Safavid Persia
logically, Azerbaijan needs to join Iran and consider the problem solved

Quote: Yarasa

about his nobility and read who the Qashqai and Qajars are

well, the USSR was led by an ethnic Georgian
this is normal for any multinational empire

[Bat]

Quote: Flood

why can't the Turks live in Iran?

And why the Turks should be ruled by a farce and not by a Turk who oppresses them?

Quote: Flood

well, the USSR was led by an ethnic Georgian

And how much did he manage? 30-50 years old? And we ruled Persia for thousands of years, Turks!

Quote: Flood

Safavid Empire, Safavid Iran, Safavid Persia
logically, Azerbaijan needs to join Iran and consider the problem solved

Not a bad idea if there are no farces or a leadership without farces.

Quote: Flood

why does justice in Azeri demand to take away its historical lands from Iran?

Because our lands are ruled by farces, which at the same time oppress us, help our enemies, and conduct a two-faced policy with us.

[For example]

You have agreed to the same thing as Zelensky.

Zelensky said that it is Ukraine that is Rus.

You say that it is Azerbaijan that is Persia.

The Persian lands were conquered by the Russians from Persia two hundred years ago.
Russia never assimilated the indigenous population, and as a result, the Persians (now their descendants are called Azerbaijanis) remained to live on their lands.

In the USSR, these lands were called Azerbaijan.
In 1991 Russia was destroyed and you became the state of Azerbaijan within the borders that the Communist Party of the Soviet Union drew for you.

That's your whole independent story.

You, like the Ukrainians, are trying to turn everything inside out.
It’s not clear why.

[Flooding]

Quote: Yarasa

30-40 million Azerbaijanis live in Iran

yes, the story is not always fair
here the people lived, but did not have their own statehood
and there are a huge number of such peoples in the world
Let's now arrange a redistribution of lands across the planet?

[Bat]

Quote: Flood

here the people lived, but did not have their own statehood

I don’t know about others. but we have always had a state.

Quote: Flood

Let's now arrange a redistribution of lands across the planet?

Very good question.
Why didn't you tell the Armenians that then? They say once there was a certain Artsakh (although he was and had nothing to do with them) then I wrote, let's remake the whole world according to that era, everyone saw LUZER not in our face, didn't they?

[Flooding]

Quote: Yarasa

Very good question.
Why didn't you tell the Armenians that then?

somehow it was not possible to communicate with the Armenians on this topic

Quote: Yarasa

let's remake the whole world after that era

you as an educated person should understand that before THAT era there was a DIFFERENT era. And so on until the Bronze Age.
It is very difficult to choose a starting point that would suit everyone.

[Bat]

Quote: Flood

somehow it was not possible to communicate with the Armenians on this topic

aaaaaaaah that's how. I've been tearing my throat here for more than 10 years (on this site but with a different login) and always said then let's return the United States to the Indians, Europe to the Romans. I said that all the time.

Quote: Flood

you as an educated person should understand that before THAT era there was a DIFFERENT era. And so on until the Bronze Age.
It is very difficult to choose a starting point that would suit everyone.

Dear, you are absolutely right, all my dislike for Armenians and farces has appeared since the 90s. Before that did everyone live? Even the last Shah of Iran, Pahlavi, was from Azerbaijan who was demolished by Khameini during the reign of Saddam Hussein.

You see, when Iran wants to show itself as the elite of Islam, a supporter of the Prophet Muhammad (Iranians consider themselves supporters and relatives of the Prophet from Imam Ali, who was the son-in-law of the Prophet's daughter), but what happened in real life? They help the pseudo-Christian Armenians to destroy us. They knew that the Armenians keep pigs in mosques, but they helped them. I'm not particularly fond of Arabs, but in this case, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. And the Armenians did not live well with us?

[Flooding]

Quote: Yarasa

aaaaaaaah that's how. I've been tearing my throat here for more than 10 years (on this site but with a different login)

remember
nickname something like Yabrat
and a photo of Al Pacino on the profile picture?
but it was a long time ago, I can be wrong

[Bat]

Quote: Flood

but it was a long time ago, I can be wrong

Not much humor) It turns out that the Armenians also created Bayraktars drones)))))))))))))))))))))))))

[alch3mist]

I've been tearing my throat here for more than 10 years (on this site but with a different login)

How is it in Azerbaijani: to have a bunch of logins specifically to crap in the comments. Does passionarity itch? Or were they beaten at school?

[Kapral Alphych]

30-40 million Azerbaijanis live in Iran.

Why don't you join Iran then? Return, so to speak, to the bosom of the mother.

[alch3mist]

30-40 million Azerbaijanis live in Iran.

That is, 10 million Azerbaijani citizens want to annex 30-40 million Iranian citizens ...
It is not surprising that they behave so arrogantly in Russia.

[Tank hard]

Quote: Flood

I think this option would be very interesting to Azerbaijan and Turkey

And the USA, and many, many, many ...

[Bat]

Quote: Tank Hard

And the USA, and many, many, many ...

Oh yes, Iran has enough "FRIENDS".

[Bat]

Quote: Alex777

Let me just remind you: Ali Khamenei is an Azerbaijani.

Fuck it !!! He's exactly that lousy sheep in the flock.

[andreykolesov123]

Quote: Alex777

Let me just remind you: Ali Khamenei is an Azerbaijani.

People who strive to live in their own national state live in Azerbaijan. In Iran, Azerbaijanis are a national minority and they are slowly being assimilated into the Persians.

[Bat]

Quote: Shurik70

I thought that Iran and Azerbaijan had excellent relations.

Alexander, let me tell you a couple of things, and then judge for yourself, hu ex hu.

1. Iranian clergy (maybe Azerbaijanis too) but these radishes oppress Azerbaijanis. If they were Azerbaijanis, they would not help the Armenians.
2. We do not have good relations with all Iranian Azerbaijanis.



these ............... Iranian Azerbaijanis, just imagine, they helped the Armenians and have been helping them for 30 years with fuel. Ours got tired of it and put a post.

3. Drugs are brought to Azerbaijan through Iran and then to Russia. There, our guys are dying so that drugs do not come to you in Russia and the end is not in sight.



and most importantly, where were these Iranians when the Armenians herded pigs in the Muslim shrines in Karabakh?

For me Iranians are a shame of Islam !!!!

[Bat]

Quote: Shurik70

I thought that Iran and Azerbaijan had excellent relations.

In words, yes, great relationships in reality, no. Although I do not exclude and do not deny that there are quite a few people living in Iran who are for us and for good relations with us. Farces are our enemies. The Armenians themselves admit that they have the same blood with them, only their faith is different.

If we were friends, would their journalists ask such a question openly to the whole world? Aliyev is a fine fellow, he smeared it beautifully !!!!

Quote: Shurik70

Azerbaijan once separated from Iran, and Iran did not punish the "separatists" for this.

Not from Iran, but from Persia, the leadership of which for thousands of years was only with the Azerbaijanis. That is, the dominant leadership of Persia was always Turks and not farces.

Quote: Shurik70

Ilham Aliyev and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad call each other "dear brother" when they meet.

Diplomacy and nothing more.

Quote: Shurik70

I believe your opinion is individual, not the majority of Azerbaijanis.

In Azerbaijan, at least 80% hate farces. Vkontakte go to the Azerbaijani forums and read the articles where they write farces about Iranians .............. I think 80% is minuscule, in fact 90 may be more. For the Iranians, mainly Talysh in Baku, there are Nardaran villages, they are also pro-Iranian ... but we keep them in a short leash ...

[Iris]

Unfortunately, the video, in which the original track has been removed and only Russian (possibly correct) translation is present, cannot serve as an illustration in principle.

[Shurik70]

Quote: Yarasa

At least 80% in Azerbaijan hate farces

For what?
It seems like a peaceful neighbor, and helps in difficult situations

[Iris]

Today Iran and Azerbaijan are strategic adversaries. And Israel's cooperation with Azerbaijan is not conditioned at all by commercial contracts for the acquisition of modern weapons, but by the threat from a common strategic enemy.

[Pereira]

If the Persians annex Azerbaijan, no one will cry especially. Well, except for the Jews, of course.

[Bat]

Quote: Pereira

If the Persians annex Azerbaijan, no one will cry especially.

If this comes to mind of farces, believe me, they will sob for a very long time.

[Machnamh]

Quote: Yarasa

I watch how Iranians help Armenians

Yes ? And just look at this? Do you refuse to see how the Turks help the Azerbaijanis? And the Azerbaijanis say and say that they are of the same blood with the Turks. Not at all embarrassed, they say that they are brothers and sisters with these ancient desert nomadic predators, the Ottomans. Their relatives, that is, the Turks, over the centuries brought death to tens of millions of people, mainly peaceful farmers and townspeople of various nationalities and religions. Since these predatory and aggressive nomads lived the Ottomans by robbery and murder. Don't want to split anything here? Maybe it's better not Iran, but Turkey to remove to hell? And don't you want to return Constantinople to its former owners either?

[Bat]

Quote: Machnamh

Do you refuse to see how the Turks help the Azerbaijanis?

1. Turks help their brothers by faith and ethnicity.
2. Turks help those for whom the UN and truth and justice.

Quote: Machnamh

Since these predatory and aggressive nomads lived the Ottomans by robbery and murder.

And what is it you did not remember the times of the dinosaurs?

Quote: Machnamh

And don't you want to return Constantinople to its former owners either?

Well, since you started talking above about the times of the nomadic Ottomans who did not roam, then maybe remember the times of Attila and see whose Constantinople was?)

And before talking to me about who and what should return, can we talk about the Kuril Islands? Or Karelia? I can continue ........... if it doesn't seem like enough. For this, do not write nonsense.

[Machnamh]

Quote: Yarasa

And what is it you did not remember the times of the dinosaurs?

OK then. Those days are long gone. Think right. Earnestly. But why did you destroy the khachkars in the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic? Is it a good thing to fight the bones of essentially dinosaurs? They have long been bones under the khachkars. "According to the International Council for the Preservation of Monuments and Landmarks (ICOMOS), Western media and Armenian sources, the destruction of historical monuments was organized by the Azerbaijani authorities." Breshut? Otherwise, it turns out very ugly. All of us - some earlier, others later - will find ourselves in the cemeteries. Regardless of the "right-wrong" faith and, so to speak, nationality

[isv000]

Quote: Yarasa

I am Azerbaijani. I watch how the Iranians help the Armenians. That is, no solidarity is not religious, not national

I am Russian. I personally know Azerbaijanis: an agreement with them is an agreement with emptiness. Looks into your eyes - brother! - says ... And then - what are you talking about ?! And I know Armenians - I promised / did. And yes - I am for the return of the Baku province to Russia ...

[And Us Rat]

Quote: Shurik70

And after that they are outraged that Iran wants to destroy Israel

You have an error in chronology, you have reversed cause and effect.

[Letun]

Quote: PiK

but the point is that Iran or the DPRK is simply faced with a choice - to have such weapons and means of delivery, or to be trampled underfoot.

Quite right. I don’t understand at all, from what buoy do the Jews think that they can have nuclear weapons, but the Persians cannot? Chosen by God?

[dauria]

I don’t understand at all, from what buoy do the Jews think that they can have nuclear weapons, but the Persians cannot?

They don't count anything. For them, it really is a "red line".
Behind which the very existence of Israel is in question. And they will act on the basis of this postulate, which is as simple as a log. But I cannot understand what Israel is threatening Iran with. Even borders are not common.
It turns out nonsense - the Iranian elite needs the image of a religious enemy. They fear their people more than Jews.

[Pickles Sunset]

The Jews developed their nuclear weapons when everyone could. Then they created the NPT, and someone decided that it was possible for someone, but for someone it was "impossible" to possess nuclear weapons.

[andreykolesov123]

Quote: Letun

I don’t understand at all, from what buoy do the Jews think that they can have nuclear weapons, but the Persians cannot?

And from what buoy do you think that you can use nuclear weapons, which the Jews invented and handed over to you?

[Letun]

Quote: andreykolesov123

And from what buoy do you think that you can use nuclear weapons, which the Jews invented and handed over to you?

At least from the fact that the USSR (modern Russia as its successor) is one of the countries that won WWII, which formed a new world order (including, by the way, the creation of the modern state of Israel) and created the UN. So that the representatives of your people took part in the creation of the atomic bomb, one might say, Stalin paid off by participating in the creation of your state

[Shahno]

// Julius Khariton and Yakov Zeldovich were the first to calculate the chain reaction of uranium fission //
Yes, we did, so formally

[andreykolesov123]

Quote: Letun

At least from the fact that the USSR (modern Russia as its successor) is one of the countries that won WWII, which formed a new world order (including, by the way, the creation of the modern state of Israel) and created the UN. So that the representatives of your people took part in the creation of the atomic bomb, one might say, Stalin paid off by participating in the creation of your state

Ie a shoemaker "invented" boots, but has no right to wear them? Funny infantile approach.
P.S. Stalin's involvement in the creation of Israel is overrated. And this site has been sorted out many, many times. Stalin voted with his three votes at the UN to create Israel. Thank him for that. But this is where his role ends. Tales about the dispatch of weapons and specialists from the USSR remain fairy tales. The bourgeois Czech Republic sold weapons to Israel 10 times more than its market price, without the permission of the USSR, and for this the Czechs were severely punished (the Slansky case). Since 1955, the USSR has taken a clear anti-Israel position. So that your reproaches past the checkout.

[Letun]

Quote: andreykolesov123

Ie a shoemaker "invented" boots, but has no right to wear them? Funny infantile approach.

The quote where I wrote that Israel has no right to develop nuclear weapons. Thinking out for others what they did not say is a ridiculous infantile approach. Well, still female, you can add
It is you, "God's chosen ones" who decide who can own and who cannot. You kill scientists, engage in openly terrorist activities. But the time will come to pay the bills, you are already starting to understand this somewhere deep inside, from that you, the "chosen of God", is so ...

[andreykolesov123]

Quote: Letun

Quote: andreykolesov123

Ie a shoemaker "invented" boots, but has no right to wear them? Funny infantile approach.

The quote where I wrote that Israel has no right to develop nuclear weapons. Thinking out for others what they did not say is a ridiculous infantile approach. Well, still female, you can add
It is you, "God's chosen ones" who decide who can own and who cannot. You kill scientists, engage in openly terrorist activities. But the time will come to pay the bills, you are already starting to understand this somewhere deep inside, from that you, the "chosen of God", is so ...

Korozhaet just you, your atisemitic splashes of saliva on the monitor ("God's chosen"), as well as a camouflaged mate ("What a buoy") we don't care about. This is just an indication that Israel is doing everything right.
P.S. I could write "god-bearers", but I don't want to offend normal Russian people with you,
Here's an amazing deal. With you Persians, everyone is engaged in terrorism except the Persians themselves. Your beloved Iranians arm their Shiite proxies, ostensibly to protect the Palestinian Sunnis, although in the same Syria and Iraq, Shiites and Sunites are happy to slaughter each other.
And as for the scientists, if the USSR had destroyed the bacteriological scientists from the Japanese detachment 731, would they also moan about them?

[Letun]

Quote: andreykolesov123

It's just you, your atisemitic spatter of saliva on the monitor

Who wrote about funny infantilism?
And your portion of anti-Semitism, you earn yourself. I treated Jews much better before I started reading the VO site. Yes, and smarter, to be honest, I counted them before ...

Quote: andreykolesov123

we don't care. This is just an indication that Israel is doing everything right.

Oh, it’s just a training manual "non-brothers breathed."

Quote: andreykolesov123

Here's an amazing deal. With you Persians, everyone is engaged in terrorism except the Persians themselves.

How many Persians killed Israeli scientists?

Quote: andreykolesov123

And as for the scientists, if the USSR had destroyed the bacteriological scientists from the Japanese detachment 731, would they also moan about them?

Well, that is, is it still possible for Persians to kill Israeli scientists? You are no better for them than the militaristic Japan of the 40s. And they will not cry for you either. Am I grabbing the logic correctly?

[andreykolesov123]

Quote: Letun

Who wrote about funny infantilism? I treated Jews much better before I started reading the VO site.

Here I sit and think, what should I do with your love / not love? And isn't it infantilism to think that your opinion about the Jews is really interesting for them. I am absolutely sure that the Jews do not give a damn about your opinion and rub it.

Quote: Letun

And your portion of anti-Semitism, you earn yourself.

Just like you, with your anti-Semitism, you cause Russophobia. (Not for me, but for other readers of your opuses)

Quote: Letun

Yes, and smarter, to be honest, I counted them before ...

This is Nazism, to believe that some nation is smarter or more stupid than another. It doesn't matter what nation we are talking about. All people are the same, there is no need to rant about "smart" and "stupid" nations. These are the same theories about "Ubermensch" and "Untermensch" only in profile. It's a shame that in the country that defeated fascism there are people like you.

Quote: Letun

Oh, it’s just a training manual "non-brothers breathed."

This is for Mazu. The dispute of the Slavic brothers is not particularly interesting to me. I am interested in issues related to Israel.

Quote: Letun

How many Persians killed Israeli scientists?

They would have killed them all, but who would give them.

Quote: Letun

Well, that is, it is still possible to kill Israeli scientists to Persians? You are no better for them than the militarist Japan of the 40s.

What do you mean "can"? Who can forbid them? However, their desires are inferior to their capabilities.

Quote: Letun

And they will not cry for you either. Am I grabbing the logic correctly?

I somehow do not observe their tears and tears of their proxy for the killed Israelis.

[Iris]

You kill scientists, engage in openly terrorist activities

I am not an Israeli, but I find it a little strange to read such comments.
Fakhrizade is a scientist. You must have thought he was a medic, researching promising ultra-low dose targeted cancer treatments for cancer?
I will disappoint. This is the head of the (now deceased) Iranian military nuclear program. General of the IRGC (Iranian counterpart of the Waffen SS)
You must not have known this, otherwise it would be impossible to write seriously about "killing scientists"! ..
Ok now you know

[Iris]

Some people can fight dogs, others cannot.
It is possible for those who know how to yell. contain, walk according to the rules.
And to those who have served eternally drunk repeat offenders walking in the playground - it is impossible.
I apologize for the metaphor.

[paul3390]

Personally, I am more worried about the presence of nuclear weapons in Pakistan and India

And me - at America ..

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: paul3390

And me - at America ..

And me the very presence of America, I won!

[paul3390]

I agree, this is very annoying.

[Maikcg]

Haberdasher and Cardinal, this is power!

[Tank hard]

But this, in no way can affect their presence in the countries you mentioned.))

[Niko]

Quote: Vladimir_2U

Personally, I am more worried about the presence of nuclear weapons in Pakistan and India.

Maybe because you do not live in Israel?

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: Niko

Maybe because you do not live in Israel?

Hmm, this is an argument.

[Evil543]

So they will bomb.

[antivirus]

and TrMV will start on BBV - Jews and Persians

everything is cyclical ... and wars are the same

and truce


and death and life

[Terrible_L.]

the Israeli military, if necessary, will strike a series of strikes on targets in Iran, even if they have to do it alone

there is no need to doubt, Israel cannot be denied decisiveness

[Dym71]

Quote: Scary_L.

there is no need to doubt, Israel cannot be denied decisiveness

Aha, they can make such a porridge that mommy does not grieve!

[Flooding]

Quote: Scary_L.

there is no need to doubt, Israel cannot be denied decisiveness

and there at least the grass does not grow
militaristic voluntarism

[Iris]

Voluntarist militarism

[Peak]

Quote: Scary_L.

there is no need to doubt, Israel cannot be denied decisiveness

Quote: Dym71

Such a porridge can be brewed that mom do not grieve!

And reshim , and can brew , but what if suddenly somehow, still think about the possible consequences for themselves? ....

[andreykolesov123]

Quote: PiK

Quote: Scary_L.

there is no need to doubt, Israel cannot be denied decisiveness

Quote: Dym71

Such a porridge can be brewed that mom do not grieve!

And reshim , and can brew , but what if suddenly somehow, still think about the possible consequences for themselves? ....

You have been frightening us with this for almost 70 years, even Bulganin in 1955 in such a veiled form threatened Israel. Since then, the USSR has collapsed, and your business is not a fountain.

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: PiK

but if suddenly somehow, they still think about possible consequences for ourselves ? ....

And, please, in more detail before nuclear weapons appear.

[ultra]

This is not decisiveness, but stubbornness.

[Peak]

Quote: ultra

This is not decisiveness, but stubbornness.

" What's on the forehead, what's on the forehead "

[dauria]

there is no need to doubt, Israel cannot be denied decisiveness

Strategic security issues are not resolved in any other way. Or or.
And to chew snot in half measures is to Putin. Especially in the 14th year. There would be no need to build a bridge, pipe SP2 and be tormented by the question "Will there be American missiles near Chernigov or not"

[Machnamh]

Quote: Scary_L.

Israel's determination cannot be denied

They have NEVER fought a worthy adversary. Hence their myths about Israel's steepest power-unsurpassed. Who are their opponents? Palestinians with homemade rockets and stones? Lebanon, Syria? It's good to beat them up with modern weapons and boast of yourself! As soon as the enemy is truly worthy, Israel. decisiveness will immediately draw its tail. Who is worthy? Yes, at least not one Iran, but Iran + Pakistan, Iran in the closest alliance with Pakistan.

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Machnamh

As soon as the enemy is truly worthy,

Feel free to name it.

[Machnamh]

Quote: Vitaly Gusin

Feel free to name it

The trouble with the Arab-Muslim world is that it is still fragmented today. But it's not a fact that everything will be the same in 30-50 years ... China 90 years ago, too, seemed to be absolutely hopelessly divided. And his military was a very pitiful sight. Compared to the same Japan. Read the memoirs of the Soviet adviser in China Chuikov, the future marshal. He described with hidden irony the Chinese "warriors" ----- a parody of fighters, solid hay and straw ... And they had the same weapons, they were matched ... Probably, there is no need to mention what is today China?

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Machnamh

The trouble with the Arab-Muslim world is that it is currently still divided.

For YOU, there may be trouble, but many Arab countries see Iran as a greater enemy to their existence than Israel, and against this background the Palestinian problems receded into the background.
But the danger to Israel has not disappeared.
There are three circles of danger.
First. these are countries and entities with a common border. such as Syria, Lebanon and Gaza.
None of them can destroy Israel, not today not in the nearest foreseeable misfortune,
The second circle includes countries such as Iraq and Yemen, as they say without comment,
And the third circle is Iran, but this is interesting.
Iran does not hide its desire to be a regional power, the revival of the Persian Empire and
it has such a potential to become so in terms of huge reserves of energy, educated population, large army and developed military industry.
But Israel stands in the way of this (I do not take into account the Arab countries around).
The Iranian leadership has patience and is investing money and weapons in the first and second rounds. This is Hezbollah in Lebanon, Ksir and Hezbollah in Syria (while Russia is there, they will not be able to do this), and in the creation of nuclear weapons, this is the main trump card that Iran can use after the destruction of the first and second circles. And the leaders of all countries who have signed an agreement with Iran know this.
If Iran accepts the treaty, it will be good for everyone.
If not, the nuclear facilities will be destroyed.
And if a retaliatory missile strike is struck, Israel will be forced to destroy the entire infrastructure for oil production, storage and transportation, it has already been shown how this is done with the help of a cyberattack on the port and railroad.

Quote: Machnamh

But it's not a fact that everything will be the same in 30-50 years ...

Yes, of course, but Israel will be different.

[Machnamh]

Quote: Vitaly Gusin

For YOU, there may be trouble, but many Arab countries see Iran as a greater enemy to their existence than Israel

And I remember how at the dawn of the new Iran, 40 years ago, Ayatollah Khomeini publicly declared to the whole world ... "I will personally cut off the hands of Israeli-Zionist and American agents if I catch these pests at home ..." wild hominid? So then one might think. It took 40 years. And what? What has this Zionist-American virus done to me in Ukraine? In many ways, in Russia? Is Belarus trying to finish everything? All over the world he stuck his brutal snout .... If it depended on me, I would have allocated you ten times more land in your Middle East than Israel now occupies ... So that you from all over the world would move there. And according to your legend, then your god would have come down to you and took you to his kingdom ... Well, you won't agree to your truth. return home, where did all your ancestors once fled from? And you create your own question in the world, YOU CREATE in the very first place ... Such beaten and oppressed everywhere in the whole practically world, but at the same time as a GUEST they always climbed to command everyone and everything ...

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Machnamh

It took 40 years. And what? What has this Zionist-American virus done to me in Ukraine? In many ways, in Russia? Is Belarus trying to finish everything? V

Sorry, I don't communicate with anti-Semites with their delirium.

[Machnamh]

Quote: Vitaly Gusin

Sorry, I do not communicate with anti-Semites with their nonsense

Why did you decide that I am an anti-Semite? What are the signs? I just criticize the Semites, or rather the Jews. I am speaking straightforwardly. Or do you consider the slightest movement against the grain and "... that's all, enough anti-Semitism ..." In any case, I'm not a caveman anti-Semite. I have quite a lot and have friends among your people. I see that my Ukrainians (myself and myself 5/8) are doing nasty and harm now, and I treat them with poorly concealed hatred ... That's a bad goy! We, the Jews, have never done this to ourselves, we are not doing and we will not do! Do I get it right ?

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Machnamh

Why did you decide that I am an anti-Semite?

These are the ways that these Rothschilds their capital, without disdaining anything ------ they got into the trust, knocked on the panamas, got the goyim drunk, bonded loans for them ... At the same time, they were in no hurry to thump ... Further more ---- slave trade, contract killings.... Read the sources. Not only those that are dear to your heart ... Of course they helped you, all those lord-peers and other Anglo-Saxon Imperials... When the slave trade and other ugly things were profitable for them ... And then what would they live on today sweet and fat, all these sirs

What is this zionist american virus have done with me in Ukraine? In many ways, in Russia? Is Belarus trying to finish everything?

[b] Zionism is a political movement whose goal is to unite and revive the Jewish people in their historical homeland - Israel (Eretz Yisrael), / b]
Without facts, THIS IS AN Antisemitic Propaganda!

[Machnamh]

Quote: Vitaly Gusin

Zionism is a political movement whose goal is to unite and revive the Jewish people in their historical homeland - Israel

Everything would be fine, but ... Here and back, you can return to the topic of Israel ---- Arabs / Muslims .... Everything has a distant sight, closer to the second half of this century .... The Muslim world will grow stronger, Western, and not only Europe, but also the United States, is gradually degrading ... Washington will no longer have time for Israel .... First of all, you need to think about yourself dear, Israel is far away .... When there are 30-40 percent of whites in the states, and the rest will be Mexicans and blacks and other colored people, and there are many prerequisites for this, then it will already be other states .... Israel they will not pull. Europe will also become a caliphate. What is Israel to do? Carthage also fell at one time, although for a long time it was the most powerful regionals ... Therefore, today wealthy Israelis remembered about Crimean Israel and from Odessa to Sochi. And the places are good, and they lived there earlier than a hundred years ago, and farther away from various Arabs ... Safer and more comfortable. And there were such plans for a long time. Wasn't there even a sedentary protest in Odessa then, the Jews there, under the USSR still? With the demand for a Jewish autonomous republic in the south of Ukraine?

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Machnamh

.Israel they will not pull

More details, please, only facts without demagoguery.

[Bat]

Quote: Machnamh

They have NEVER fought a worthy adversary.

Sergei, go learn history. They were attacked by the Egyptians and Lebanese and Jordanians and Syrians and almost the entire Arab world and all taken together. It seems to you unworthy opponents?))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Learn history.

[Machnamh]

Quote: Yarasa

They were attacked by both Egyptians and Lebanese and Jordanians and Syrians

Israelis, that is, Jews, have long been with money. With a lot of money. Gogol is considered an anti-Semite in your country, so read Taras Bulba again. How he would have smoked the entire voivodeship in 10 years. In these ways, these Rothschilds made their capital, not disdaining anything ------ they got into the trust, knocked on the Panamas, soldered the goyim, bonded loans for them ... At the same time, they were in no hurry to drink ... Further more --- - slave trade, contract killings .... Read the sources. Not only those that are dear to your heart ... Of course, they helped you, all those lords-peers and other Anglo-Saxon Imperials ... When the slave trade and other ugly things were profitable for them ... lived sweet and fat, all these sirs! As for the Egyptian and other Arabs, about 70 years ago they only started to emerge from their sand and tribal-pastoralist way of life. People were still largely not only dark, but even primitive. Although the USSR supplied them with modern weapons and trained them, they sacredly observed their prayer. Here we must fight, and the time for prayer has come. Therefore, arms aside. This was typical not only for Arabs. Read how they fought in Spain in 1936-39 in civilian life. Both Republicans and Francoists. War is war, but it's time for dinner ----- put aside weapons and enjoy eating food .... For your people, in the wars with the Arabs, this was already a passed stage. Hence your victories. But in many ways, the Arabs have already gone, they are no longer caught for such things. But of course they still have to go through a lot of difficulties to .... Well, you get the idea. To put you in your place

[Cananecat]

Tel Aviv is ready to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons to destroy Israel, he added.

Having a vigorous neighbor close by is not ice, of course, but who said that after the creation of nuclear weapons in Iran, the latter will test it in Israel?
Israel should change its rhetoric and put up with Iran's developments, and not bomb everything, increasing the likelihood of using God's chosen nuclear weapons.

[Tank hard]

Quote: Canecat

Having a vigorous neighbor close by is not ice, of course

Quote: Canecat

and put up with development

[Iris]

.. but who said that after the creation of nuclear weapons in Iran, the latter will test it in Israel?

As far as I know, top echelon Iranian officials don't do a rare week public official statements about the unyielding intention to destroy Israel, declaring this task almost the main one in the life of the country.
Do you think this is just Middle Eastern militant rhetoric? This is exactly how Israel treated this for several decades, while the most dangerous thing that the Ayatollahs could do was to arm Hezbollah.
But with the advent of nuclear weapons, the Ayatollah has a real opportunity to try to implement his intentions. To a similar danger owes react any government of any state. In our, for example, the Russian military doctrine on this score, the possibility of a preemptive nuclear strike is spelled out.

[Flooding]

Quote: Iris

In our, for example, the Russian military doctrine on this score, the possibility of a preemptive nuclear strike is spelled out.

but the wording presupposes certain conditions, different from those that currently exist in Iranian-Israeli relations

The Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction against it and (or) its allies, as well as in the case of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened.

[Iris]

also in the case of aggression against the Russian Federation using conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened.

.

Thanks for the literal quote
It is this point - which, unfortunately, determines the real possible situation of the Iranian-Israeli confrontation - that I had in mind.
Regards, Iris.

[Flooding]

Quote: Iris

Iranian officials of the highest echelon rarely make public official statements about their unyielding intention to destroy Israel for a rare week, declaring this task to be almost the main one in the life of the country

looked for
found a 2019 interview of the Iranian Foreign Minister to a French journalist

Zarif vehemently rejected the very formulation of the question: “When and who said that Iran would destroy Israel? Show me at least one person who said that. " The journalist immediately retorted, citing the words of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2007: "Israel must disappear from the map of the world." Zarif replied that "Ahmadinejad quoted Ayatollah Khomeini who said that Israel would disappear from the pages of history, but he did not say that he would destroy it."

the person is quite official, I must admit

translation of an article by the Israeli publication Haaretz on inosmi:
https://inosmi.ru/politic/20190110/244364111.html

[Cananecat]

Quote: Iris

rarely a week do they make public official statements about their adamant intent to destroy Israel,

You know where the expression "the last Chinese warning" came from, the same with the Iranians ... you can talk and arm as much as you want, however, Iran will not want to snatch a reply that is many times greater than an attempt. Treat this as a national idea. As long as it exists, the nation lives and works, as soon as the idea is gone ...

[paul3390]

Iranian top echelon officials rarely make a public announcement for a week about their unyielding intent to destroy Israel

Duc - and Izrailovka screams almost every day that they will bomb Iran together with America tomorrow! AND? What is the difference?

[Pickles Sunset]

Quote: paul3390

Duc - and Izrailovka screams almost every day that they will bomb Iran together with America tomorrow! AND? What is the difference?

The question here is what comes first? Israel did not threaten the Iranians, unlike the Iranians themselves. And he began to speak publicly about the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities only after numerous Iranian tantrums and threats to Israel.

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Canecat

but who said that after the creation of nuclear weapons in Iran, the latter will test it on the territory of Israel?

Khamenei stated : “The position of Iran, which was first expressed by the Imam [Khomeini] ... is that a cancerous tumor called Israel must be eradicated from the region and Iran's permanent subject is the elimination of Israel from the region».

"Imam [Khomeini]
“According to the statement of the Supreme Leader, Tel Aviv and Haifa will be destroyed... The armed forces are ready to fulfill the orders of the Supreme Leader in the shortest possible time with all their forces.

General Mohammad Hedjazi
Deputy Chief of Staff
". We will not give up our [armed] struggle before the destruction of Israel and until we can pray in the Al-Aqsa Mosque. " (everyone who wants can pray today)

Brig. General Mohammad Reza Nakdi,
militia commander basij
“Enemies talk about options [they have] on the table. They should know that the first option on our table is the destruction of Israel. "

Chairman of the Assembly of Experts Ayatollah Mohammad Reza Mahdavi Kani
"The Zionist regime will soon be destroyed, and this generation will witness its destruction."

Hojatoleslam Mohammad Hassan Akhtari
Operations representative, former ambassador to Syria.
"If once the destruction and death of occupying Israel was an impossible and unattainable dream, today, thanks to the historical and reasonable actions of Imam Khomeini, this has become possible and is actually in the process of implementation."

These are just some of these statements.
And now you can quote something similar to what the leaders of Israel said.
Except those that NOT ACCEPTED this.
But we are not talking about the destruction of the state of Iran, but the elimination of weapons with which they can achieve their goals.

[Maz]

Quote: Vitaly Gusin

Quote: Canecat

but who said that after the creation of nuclear weapons in Iran, the latter will test it on the territory of Israel?

Khamenei stated : “The position of Iran, which was first expressed by the Imam [Khomeini] ... is that a cancerous tumor called Israel must be eradicated from the region and Iran's permanent subject is the elimination of Israel from the region».

"Imam [Khomeini]
“According to the statement of the Supreme Leader, Tel Aviv and Haifa will be destroyed... The armed forces are ready to fulfill the orders of the Supreme Leader in the shortest possible time with all their forces.

General Mohammad Hedjazi
Deputy Chief of Staff
". We will not give up our [armed] struggle before the destruction of Israel and until we can pray in the Al-Aqsa Mosque. " (everyone who wants can pray today)

Brig. General Mohammad Reza Nakdi,
militia commander basij
“Enemies talk about options [they have] on the table. They should know that the first option on our table is the destruction of Israel. "

Chairman of the Assembly of Experts Ayatollah Mohammad Reza Mahdavi Kani
"The Zionist regime will soon be destroyed, and this generation will witness its destruction."

Hojatoleslam Mohammad Hassan Akhtari
Operations representative, former ambassador to Syria.
"If once the destruction and death of occupying Israel was an impossible and unattainable dream, today, thanks to the historical and reasonable actions of Imam Khomeini, this has become possible and is actually in the process of implementation."

These are just some of these statements.
And now you can quote something similar to what the leaders of Israel said.
Except those that NOT ACCEPTED this.
But we are not talking about the destruction of the state of Iran, but the elimination of weapons with which they can achieve their goals.

Well, in the Torah it is also written and stated that you are Jews, supposedly chosen by God and brilliant and so on, and so on, but in fact, in fact, they are just arrogant and shamelessly cunning zhalopennye. So there is a difference between what they say and what they do. While Israel's revenge is making bombing raids, shelling and rocket launches on its neighbors, and I don’t remember Iran zhahnuli from its territory to Israel in the next twenty years, at least from an airplane, rocket or something else. But Israel over the past year has been so noted that if any incident happened and not only the Russian military component would gladly smear the IDF across the deserts and mountains of the Promised Land ...

[andreykolesov123]

Quote: Maz

Well, in the Torah it is also written and stated that you are Jews, supposedly chosen by God and brilliant and so on, and so on, but in fact, in fact, they are just arrogant and shamelessly cunning zhalopennye. So there is a difference between what they say and what they do. While Israel's revenge is making bombing raids, shelling and rocket launches on its neighbors, and I don’t remember Iran zhahnuli from its territory to Israel in the next twenty years, at least from an airplane, rocket or something else. But Israel over the past year has been so noted that if any incident happened and not only the Russian military component would gladly smear the IDF across the deserts and mountains of the Promised Land ...

Maz you have been living in Israel for so long that you began to forget Russian. And how is it with you? Doesn't it pull back in nenko?

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Maz

Well, the torus also says

If someone comes to kill you
Get up and kill him.
Babylonian Talmud,
Sanhedrin treatise,
part 71 verse 1

[Troll]

Quote: Vladimir_2U

Personally, I am more worried about the presence of nuclear weapons in Pakistan and India.

And Israel? Not?
..
Israel uses its forces much more often than India and Pakistan. It is he who is bombing neighboring countries.

[Pickles Sunset]

Quote: Troll

Israel uses its forces much more often than India and Pakistan. It is he who is bombing neighboring countries.

Not neighboring countries, but an enemy neighbor. Moreover, this neighbor has declared war on Israel, the world does not want to sign, and continues to fight with someone else's hands. I’ll name at least 5 countries with nuclear weapons that are currently fighting outside their countries and threatening another nuclear strike.

[bk316]

Not neighboring countries, but an enemy neighbor.

Lying again. Israel bombed both Iran and Lebanon and Syria. Everything is preventive. Iran did not even declare war.

[tralflot1832]

And how much, according to the IAEA, is needed for fissile materials to create a bombshell, just a little bit? You have to do everything yourself. And even Massad stands behind each centrifuge, does not sleep. Just a shake of the air. Yes, and China needs Iran as a peaceful one, hundreds of billions of yuan demand silence and protection.

[Tank hard]

Quote: tralflot1832

Just a shake of air

The bomb will be. IMHO. And time will tell whether I am right or not. Let's see what happens.

[aszzz888]

Tank Hard (Daniel von Messer)
Today, 09: 49
NEW

+2
Quote: tralflot1832
Just a shake of air

The bomb will be. IMHO. And time will tell whether I am right or not. Let's see what happens.

So yes, Israel can have poisonous charges, but Iran is not allowed? Where's the justice!

[Tank hard]

There is little justice in this world ... It's just an opinion and circumstances. What are the circumstances? Well, does Iran need to defend itself from a bunch of enemies? And how is it worse than North Korea in this regard? Well, what happens, we'll see.

[aszzz888]

Tank Hard (Daniel von Messer)
Today, 10: 21

0
There is little justice in this world ... It's just an opinion and circumstances. What are the circumstances? Well, does Iran need to defend itself from a bunch of enemies? And how is it worse than North Korea in this regard? Well, what happens, we'll see.

Absolutely agree. For some can do EVERYTHING, while others are bombed for the same.

[Troll]

No, it's all simpler and it is not necessary to ask Magate, but to read it in textbooks. Googled "critical mass".

[paul3390]

It is interesting - did Israilovka herself get her nuclear weapons absolutely legally? Like - is officially a member of the nuclear club, participates in all agreements on this topic, and so on? Who would blame Iran - but not they. They themselves have a snout in the down on the very eyebrows, remember what methods they riveted their vigorous loaf .. Or is it only God's chosen one?

[Aaron Zawi]

Quote: paul3390

It is interesting - did Israilovka herself get her nuclear weapons absolutely legally? Like - is officially a member of the nuclear club, participates in all agreements on this topic, and so on? Who would blame Iran - but not they. They themselves have a snout in the down on the very eyebrows, remember what methods they riveted their vigorous loaf .. Or is it only God's chosen one?

What does legal mean? For example, the USSR received nuclear weapons with whose permission?

[paul3390]

The USSR received its nuclear weapons before any international treaties on this topic. But you - even uranium was actually stolen. And here is your reactor on which you produce plutonium - is it under the control of the IAEA? And the plant for its processing? And in general - do you admit that you have nuclear weapons? No? Why do you so angrily condemn Iran for basically the same thing?

[Borz]

No, Aaron will not answer your questions, just as Israel does not answer that it has nuclear weapons. Maybe yes, maybe no. Israel is a terrorist state. They bomb the territory of neighboring and not very countries, meanly kill Iranian scientists involved in the creation of nuclear weapons ... But they themselves do not admit the idea of ​​any control of their nuclear center by the IAEA.
It is believed that by the presence of nuclear weapons, Israel ensures its existence as a state. And the worse Iran and North. Korea? What, the people inhabiting these countries are very different ?! How, tell me, are the religious fanatics of Israel different from the fanatics of Muslim Iran or adherents of the Juche ideas? I believe that there is no need to help them in the development of military nuclear technologies, they will cope on their own, but they will not cope, sorry, they have not matured technologically. But it is necessary to control these processes.

[Professor]

Quote: Borz

And the worse Iran and North. Korea?

You're right. Why is Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova or Estonia worse? Why is there suddenly a nuclear club? This is not fair. Everyone should have nuclear weapons. Both Afghanistan and Icheria. All peoples are equal.

[Trapp1st]

Both Afghanistan and Icheria.

I suggest you go and personally hold talks on this topic, state your position, express your deepest support and promise help.

[Professor]

Quote: Trapp1st

Both Afghanistan and Icheria.

I suggest you go and personally hold talks on this topic, state your position, express your deepest support and promise help.

You can keep your offer with you.

Quote: Borz

And Israel in the nuclear club? Or is it embarrassing to talk about him?

No. Israel does not join such treaties, although it could easily join this club. At the time the club was created, Israel possessed nuclear weapons.

Quote: Borz

Read about the technological capabilities in my post above. Which Estonia or Ukraine are you talking about? This is now the main factor holding back the expansion of the "nuclear club".

Ukraine, Estonia and Russia are capitalized. These countries are equal. Read the UN Charter.
With regard to technological development, Ukraine is quite capable of creating nuclear weapons on its own, and we can help Estonia. Not a single international treaty prohibits us from doing this.

Quote: Borz

"Icheria" - you probably meant Ichkeria. So I'll tell you, there is no such state on the map. Well, or you have a different card ...

My typo. There is no such state yet, but there are people of Ichkeria. All peoples are equal.

[Trapp1st]

You can keep your offer with you.

Can't walk past the needy, sorry

There is no such state yet, but there are people of Ichkeria.

The indigenous inhabitants of Chechnya are Chechens, do not believe me, ask them, they will explain everything in a popular way, it will come to the end even to you, dear mouthpiece of Islamic extremism and Russophobia.

[Professor]

Quote: Trapp1st

The indigenous inhabitants of Chechnya are Chechens, do not believe me, ask them, they will explain everything in a popular way, it will come to the end even to you, dear mouthpiece of Islamic extremism and Russophobia.

Am I against? Let the Chechens have nuclear weapons. Why are they worse than other peoples?

[Trapp1st]

Let the Chechens have nuclear weapons.

Russia has it, which means everyone who lives in this multinational country.

[Professor]

Quote: Trapp1st

Let the Chechens have nuclear weapons.

They have!

No. They need both nuclear weapons on their territory and, most importantly, a "button".

[Trapp1st]

No. They need

Did they tell you that? What kind of citizens of Russia do you decide?

[Professor]

Quote: Trapp1st

Did they tell you that? What kind of citizens of Russia do you decide?

God forbid. Each nation decides for itself. The nation's right to self-determination however. Forty-eighth session, 1996.

[Trapp1st]

God forbid. Each nation decides for itself. The nation's right to self-determination however.

As I understand it, does this also apply to the Middle East, or is it something else?

[Professor]

Quote: Trapp1st

As I understand it, does this also apply to the Middle East, or is it something else?

Of course. All peoples are equal.

[Maikcg]

And the main thing for the Palestinians is also a button. Why are they worse?

[Professor]

Quote: MaikCG

And the main thing for the Palestinians is also a button. Why are they worse?

The Palestinians already have it.

[Maikcg]

From here in more detail.

[Professor]

Quote: MaikCG

From here in more detail.

We are the Palestinians, the CEP.

[ccsr]

Quote: professor

Let the Chechens have nuclear weapons. Why are they worse than other peoples?

So they use it against the Israelis in the first place, handing it over to Hezbollah or the Muslim brothers. And then a kirdyk will come to you - do you dream about it?

[Machnamh]

Quote: ccsr

Quote: professor
Let the Chechens have nuclear weapons. Why are they worse than other peoples?

So they use it against the Israelis in the first place, handing it over to Hezbollah or the Muslim brothers. And then a kirdyk will come to you - do you dream about it?

Cunningly made professr. He cited Chechentsev as an example. It does not support the fact that the Druze got it.

[Borz]

Quote: professor

Quote: Trapp1st

Both Afghanistan and Icheria.

I suggest you go and personally hold talks on this topic, state your position, express your deepest support and promise help.

You can keep your offer with you.

Quote: Borz

And Israel in the nuclear club? Or is it embarrassing to talk about him?

No. Israel does not join such treaties, although it could easily join this club. At the time the club was created, Israel possessed nuclear weapons.

Quote: Borz

Read about the technological capabilities in my post above. Which Estonia or Ukraine are you talking about? This is now the main factor holding back the expansion of the "nuclear club".

Ukraine, Estonia and Russia are capitalized. These countries are equal. Read the UN Charter.
With regard to technological development, Ukraine is quite capable of creating nuclear weapons on its own, and we can help Estonia. Not a single international treaty prohibits us from doing this.

Quote: Borz

"Icheria" - you probably meant Ichkeria. So I'll tell you, there is no such state on the map. Well, or you have a different card ...

My typo. There is no such state yet, but there are people of Ichkeria. All peoples are equal.

It's not a typo, but a deliberate distortion of the concept. "Chechens" or, as they often call themselves, "Vainakhs" live in Chechnya. But not Ichkerians or Ichkerians. You are specifically using the definition used by the Chechen separatists. For what, the answer is obvious.

[Borz]

With regard to technological development, Ukraine is quite capable of creating nuclear weapons on its own, and we can help Estonia. Not a single international treaty prohibits us from doing this.

Ukraine is just right to think about the heating season, as well as where to get money to pay interest on loans taken earlier, and not about the creation of nuclear weapons. And by the way, what technologies can we talk about if the Ukrainian industry is unable to reproduce the Soviet mortar? Do you understand what kind of industry and resources a country must have in order to create nuclear weapons.?
Although, I understand why you are making these statements ...
And about Estonia ... Yes, God, help her already, at least someone, otherwise there is such a "evil dwarf", offended by everyone. Selling politicians, zero resources, influential neighbors ... but somehow you need to live. This applies not only to limitrophes. The countries you listed above also fall under this definition.

[Professor]

Quote: Borz

Do you understand what kind of industry and resources a country must have in order to create nuclear weapons.?

Like Israel in 1964. Ukraine is now more developed.

Quote: Borz

And about Estonia ... Yes, God, help her already, at least someone, otherwise there is such a "evil dwarf", offended by everyone.

Estonia with a capital letter. Envy her in silence.
http://ej.ru/?a=note&id=36494

Quote: Borz

Selling politicians, zero resources, influential neighbors ... but somehow you need to live.

"somehow" you live.

Estonian GDP per capita in 2019 at par $ 23 (758st), at PPP - $ 41 (38th).
For comparison: in Russia, GDP in 2019 amounted to $ 11 at par (601th place), according to PPP - $ 64 (28rd place).

The average wage in Estonia in December 2020 was 1604 euros.
For comparison. According to official data from Rosstat, the income of the Russian population in 2020 was 35 rubles per month (about 361 euros), the average monthly salary was 400 rubles (less than 51 euros).

[Borz]

Quote: professor

Quote: Borz

Do you understand what kind of industry and resources a country must have in order to create nuclear weapons.?

Like Israel in 1964. Ukraine is now more developed.

Do you equate the industrial capabilities of Ukraine with Israel? Come on ... there are a couple of questions.
Was Israel just like modern Ukraine under external control? Has Israel also, instead of creating an industry and improving the quality of life of the Jewish population, embarked on all the hard times of cave nationalism? And it was in Israel that officials sold out the whole country, passed laws that were fatal for its economy, medicine and education system?

Quote: Borz

And about Estonia ... Yes, God, help her already, at least someone, otherwise there is such a "evil dwarf", offended by everyone.

Estonia with a capital letter. Envy her in silence.
http://ej.ru/?a=note&id=36494
I write as I want. And there is nothing to envy there.

Quote: Borz

Selling politicians, zero resources, influential neighbors ... but somehow you need to live.

"somehow" you live.

Do not be rude, you do not know me and cannot judge how I live.

[Professor]

Quote: Borz

Do not be rude, you do not know me and cannot judge how I live.

The figures on how Russians and Estonians live are higher. Full link in the same place.

[Borz]

Quote: professor

Quote: Borz

Do not be rude, you do not know me and cannot judge how I live.

The figures on how Russians and Estonians live are higher. Full link in the same place.

I do not live in Russia. No links and maxims justify your attempts to get nasty. Although, watching your comments on the site, I did not expect anything else from you.

[Professor]

Quote: Borz

I do not live in Russia.

I'm so sorry.

Quote: Borz

Your attempts to get nasty. Although, watching your comments on the site, I did not expect anything else from you.

My condolences again. And it's not my fault how Russians live.

[Borz]

Quote: professor

Quote: Borz

And the worse Iran and North. Korea?

You're right. Why is Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova or Estonia worse? Why is there suddenly a nuclear club? This is not fair. Everyone should have nuclear weapons. Both Afghanistan and Icheria. All peoples are equal.

And Israel in the nuclear club? Or is it embarrassing to talk about him?

Read about the technological capabilities in my post above. Which Estonia or Ukraine are you talking about? This is now the main factor holding back the expansion of the "nuclear club".

"Icheria" - you probably meant Ichkeria. So I'll tell you, there is no such state on the map. Well, or you have a different card ...

[bk316]

Sokolov Oleg

Oleg Oleg, well, don't talk nonsense. It’s not about the people, but about the state, it’s always like that in all matters with you. And the Ayatola did not say anything about the Jews, he spoke about the Jewish state.
And generally speaking.
Ichkeria does not exist.
Moldova doesn't want to.
And Ukraine itself refused.
The Taliban will sooner or later have a well if they build a state.
And Iran will soon have ...

[Aaron Zawi]

Quote: paul3390

The USSR received its nuclear weapons before any international treaties on this topic. But you - even uranium was actually stolen. And here is your reactor on which you produce plutonium - is it under the control of the IAEA? And the plant for its processing? And in general - do you admit that you have nuclear weapons? No? Why do you so angrily condemn Iran for basically the same thing?

And Israel, unlike Iran or Pakistan, did not join the UNNAO.

[paul3390]

So you need to be bombed? In order to prevent the possession of secret uncontrolled nuclear weapons? On kraynyak - impose sanctions on you? Why are you better than Iran or North Korea?

[surf dude]

Have tried it already, and more than once. Shit.

[paul3390]

To drive the Arabs is not great merit. For you, just seriously, no one undertook. But sooner or later, you will run into such behavior.

[surf dude]

Well, they will get it seriously and back. Many have already understood that it is better to be friends with us. Good for the economy.

[Professor]

Quote: paul3390

The USSR received its nuclear weapons before any international treaties on this topic.

Neither and Israel are also up to ...

Quote: paul3390

But you - even uranium was actually stolen. And here is your reactor on which you produce plutonium - is it under the control of the IAEA?

What for? We don’t show them anything, and they don’t help us in any way. Everything is fair and according to the law.

Quote: paul3390

And the plant for its processing? And in general - do you admit that you have nuclear weapons? No?

Should they?

Quote: paul3390

Why do you so angrily condemn Iran for basically the same thing?

You are not in the subject. Iran signed a treaty and got technology, and then broke the treaty. Israel signed nothing, received nothing, and violated nothing. What are the claims, young man?

By the way, unlike Iran, we do not threaten to erase any state from the map of the world.

[Tank hard]

Professor, you are a conservative. Traditionally, you answer with questions.))

[Borz]

By the way, unlike Iran, we do not threaten to erase any state from the map of the world.

Yes, you just kill their people and bomb military targets without declaring war on these countries.

[Vitaly gusin]

Quote: Borz

Yes, you just kill their people and bomb military targets without declaring war on these countries.

The military doctrine of Russia says:
23. The use of the Armed Forces, other troops and bodies in
Peaceful time carried out by the decision of the President of the Russian
Federation in the manner prescribed by the federal
legislation. At the same time, the use of the Armed Forces,
other troops and bodies carried out decisively,
purposefully and comprehensively based on advance and
constant analysis of the emerging military-political and
military-strategic situation
And Israel fully supports and applies it.
And there is also an international term "proactive self-defense". In international policy, according to which this can only be justified in cases where" the need for such self-defense is instantaneous, irresistible and leaves no choice of means and time for reflection. "
As you understand, while diplomacy is working, it cannot be used, but as soon as it ends, the issue will be resolved in accordance with international laws.

[paul3390]

Iran signed a treaty and got technology, and then broke the treaty. Israel signed nothing, received nothing, and violated nothing. What are the claims, young man?

Girl - no need to shaggy grandma. Treaty - Iran signed under the Shah. And the additional protocol was signed but not ratified. This means that he is not obliged to do it. And as we know, the United States was the first to come out of the latest agreements. Why should Iran stick to it then? And by the way - like you - he never said that he was making a bomb. What is the difference between you then?

And about not threatening - are you laughing ?? Aren't your leaders calling for the immediate bombing of Iran every day? Didn't you smash Saddam's reactor? By the way - completely official? Aren't you fucking Syria in vain? Fear God though ..

[aszzz888]

paul3390 (Paul)
Today, 09: 33
NEW

+7
The USSR received its nuclear weapons before any international treaties on this topic. But you - even uranium was actually stolen. And here is your reactor on which you produce plutonium - is it under the control of the IAEA? And the plant for its processing? And in general - do you admit that you have nuclear weapons? No? Why do you so angrily condemn Iran for basically the same thing?

On such questions, they are silent in a rag.

[surf dude]

Why answer such questions? There are a lot of open sources, if you are interested, study, compare, and draw conclusions. There are no official statements on this topic. And it won't.

[aszzz888]

surfdude (surfdude)
Yesterday, 12: 35
NEW

-1
Why answer such questions? There are a lot of open sources, if you are interested, study, compare, and draw conclusions. There are no official statements on this topic. And will not be.

press release from mid isravul ?!

[surf dude]

No, no desire to throw beads;)))

[Pickles Sunset]

Quote: paul3390

The USSR received its nuclear weapons before any international treaties on this topic.

Israel also received its nuclear weapons long before the creation of any international treaties on this topic.

[Tank hard]

Quote: paul3390

It is interesting - did Israilovka herself get her nuclear weapons absolutely legally? Like - is officially a member of the nuclear club, participates in all agreements on this topic, and so on? Who would blame Iran - but not they. They themselves have a snout in the down on the very eyebrows, remember what methods they riveted their vigorous loaf .. Or is it only God's chosen one?

This is different!))

[alch3mist]

It is interesting - did Israilovka herself get her nuclear weapons absolutely legally?

Most likely, the same as the Taliban their arsenal: the exceptional "accidentally" lost.

[BABAY22]

the Israeli military, if necessary, will inflict a series of strikes on targets in Iran

Is it not an act of aggression against a sovereign state? With all the ensuing consequences, such as expulsion from the UN, enforcement of peace ...

[rocket757]

Israeli Defense Minister: Iran is on the verge of creating a nuclear bomb

... If you want to be independent, create strong arguments to defend your independence.
Alas, this is now the case.

[Trapp1st]

Israeli Defense Minister: Iran is on the verge of creating a nuclear bomb

That there is again a political crisis or unrest in Israel, or maybe people have begun to guess about something?

[nikvic46]

Let Israel give up its own nuclear weapons. And then he nods at the neighbors.

[aszzz888]

Israeli Defense Minister: Iran is on the verge of creating a nuclear bomb

another one decided to shake a test tube with washing powder!

[Tagan]

Quote: Vladimir_2U

Quote: paul3390

And me - at America ..

And me the very presence of America, I won!

This is a forbidden trick)))

[blackberry]

"Who is talking about what, and crummy about the bath ..."

[Trapp1st]

"Who is talking about what, and crummy about the bath ..."

Possibly on fire from an Iranian nuclear deal.

[moscowp]

On the line Libya, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, who was left unoccupied? That's right, Egypt and Iran. Egypt does not shine, so Iran looks to be next.

[Maikcg]

could lead to the start of a "nuclear arms race" in the Middle East

Elementary Watson, Israel utilizes its own, which it allegedly does not have, and the race ends before it starts. Or maybe the minister wants to answer for the Israeli armed attacks on American laboratories and the theft of fissile materials

[Machnamh]

Well, after all, Israel did not join the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. What is the question then? In your own "elitism"? And it feeds the soil for anti-Semites at the same time with such freaks ...

[letovvany]

Israel just needs to find (or invent) an excuse to inflict a series of blows on the territory of its neighbors. From their methods of solving problems, problems only grow.

[yfast]

Quote: Iris

Iranian officials of the highest echelon rarely make public official statements about their adamant intent to destroy Israel for a rare week, declaring this task to be almost the main one in the life of the country.

Here, too, our neighbors are waging war with us, mostly in public, and the faces are all completely official.

[Dkuznecov]

It stands on the threshold, nothing will be done to Iran.

[riwas]

Israel will not "rust". The fact that he will decide to strike at Iran is highly probable. The only question is: alone or the United States, with or without the use of nuclear weapons, and how ready Iran is to repel such a strike. The day before, he boasted that his Bavar-373 air defense system is no worse than the S-300.