Will the S-300V1 and S-300PS air defense systems help Kiev?

71

Undoubtedly, the operational redeployment of numerous tank, motorized rifle, artillery and engineering units of the Land Forces of the Eastern and Central Military Districts of the Russian Armed Forces, as well as the deployment of additional tactical bombing squadrons of the Su-34, fighter squadrons of the Su-30SM at permanent bases and airfields of the Western and Southern Military Districts (including the Republic of Crimea) / 1 and the S-300V4 / 400 anti-aircraft missile regiments, finally convinced the expert and observing communities of the readiness and ability of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces to promptly implement appropriate countermeasures in response to the emergence of crisis military-political situations on the near approaches to the borders of our state.

The anti-aircraft and anti-missile potentials of the S-300V1 and S-300PS anti-aircraft missile systems inherited from the USSR Air Defense Forces are still high, but they are not able to oppose anything to the promising means of aerospace attack of the Russian Aerospace Forces.


At first glance, the above steps of the command of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation were demonstrated exclusively in preparation for the large-scale Russian-Belarusian strategic command and staff exercises (CSU) West-2021, scheduled for September 2021.



Meanwhile, it would be extremely naive to assume that this large-scale redeployment of dozens of combat units of the Ground Forces and Aerospace Forces of Russia in the western strategic direction has absolutely no causal relationship with the active preparation of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine for the resumption of active hostilities observed since March 2021. Donbass theater of military operations.

As you know, it was during this crisis period, which marked the beginning of the critical rollback of Russian-American relations to the level of the Cold War of 1979-1987, that the command of the Ukrainian Armed Forces carried out not only the transfer of several mechanized brigades of dozens of BM-21 MLRS rocket launchers to the line of contact in Donbas "Grad" and BM-27 "Hurricane" for an attempt to carry out an offensive throw in Telman and Mariupol operational directions, but also a hasty deployment near Kramatorsk and Mariupol of anti-aircraft missile batteries of the military air defense system S-300V1, as well as an anti-aircraft missile regiment of two C divisions -300PT / PS.

It is logical to assume that due to the absence in the 1st and 2nd army corps of the LDNR People's Militia of such kind of troops as air force, abundant modern tactical aviation 4th and transitional generation and army aviation (multipurpose fighters MiG-29SMT and Su-30SM, attack aircraft of the Su-25SM / 3 family, as well as Ka-52 and Mi-28N attack helicopters), the only reasoned purpose of deploying these anti-aircraft missile systems in the Donbass theater of operations, there is counteraction against the tactical aviation of the Aerospace Forces of Russia, which can be used against fortified areas, accumulations of armored vehicles, as well as means of radar and radio-technical reconnaissance of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in key areas of the Donbass theater of military operations.

So, the hotheads in the NSDC and the defense department of the "Independent" supervised by the Pentagon and the US State Department are seriously considering the possibility of confrontation with the units of the Russian Armed Forces deployed in the Southern Military District and the Republic of Crimea (including combat units of the Aerospace Forces)?

Another, no less compelling, justification for the deployment of the S-300V1 and S-300PS air defense missile launchers near Kramatorsk and Mariupol is the formation of anti-missile "umbrellas" over the command and staff infrastructure of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, built in these cities over the past 5 years.

So, having high-speed anti-aircraft interceptor missiles 9М83-1 and 5В55Р, as well as radars for illumination and guidance 9С32-1 and 30Н6Е with software and hardware algorithms for detecting, tracking and "capturing" small ballistic targets with EPR 0,02-0,05 kV ... m, inherited by the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the Air Defense Forces and the Soviet Air Defense Forces, the S-300V1 and S-300PS anti-aircraft missile systems are quite capable of covering the above command and staff units of the Ukrainian army from strikes of the 9M79-1 Tochka-U tactical ballistic missiles, a certain number of which (according to some sources) were at the disposal of the army corps of the LDNR as trophies obtained in the course of various episodes of confrontation for control over various regions of Donbass in the last months of 2014.

Inertial navigation data systems of operational-tactical ballistic missiles cannot boast of the presence of specialized flight modes that provide for the implementation of anti-aircraft maneuvers on the cruise and terminal sections of the trajectories.

Consequently, even outdated anti-aircraft guided missiles 9M83-1 and 5V55R of the S-300V1 and S-300PS complexes, which have available overloads of 20 and 27 units. accordingly, they are quite capable of intercepting low-maneuverable Tochki-U.

Meanwhile, especially reckless representatives of the defense department of the "Independent" and the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine should pay attention to the fact that, if Kiev attempts to implement the next escalation round in Donbass, the units of the Missile Forces and Artillery (MFA) of Russia can use unique OTRK of their kind " Iskander-M ", the equipment of which is represented by paired transport and launch guides for a pair of operational-tactical BR 9M723-1" Iskander-M ".

These ballistic missiles can boast of the presence of four specialized tail two-nozzle gas-dynamic pitch control units and developed aerodynamic rudders of a large area, which (in conjunction with specialized INS operation modes based on single-axis and three-axis accelerometers ADXL193 and ADXL330) provide for intense turns in the pitch plane of 25– 30 units

Neither 9M83-1 SAM interceptors nor the more highly maneuverable 5V55R anti-aircraft missiles will be able to withstand these Russian OTBRs, because the maximum overloads of intercepted targets for these SAMs do not exceed 8 and 12 units. respectively.

Hack and predictor Aviator


A pair of divisions of promising Iskander-M missile systems, consisting of 8 complexes (with 32 operational-tactical BR 9M723-1) will be quite enough to disable almost all illumination and guidance radars of the S-300V1, S-300PS and Buk-M1 air defense systems ", Which are in service with the Air Force of Ukraine.
71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +26
    29 August 2021 15: 12
    Will the S-300V1 and S-300PS air defense systems help Kiev?

    Do not know. what will help them, because in the master's hands there is also a bull's tail - a rope, but here is how Russian anti-aircraft gunners shoot:
    A Russian anti-aircraft gunner hits a TY-300D high-speed missile in China:
    1. +9
      29 August 2021 15: 21
      The only thing that will help them is to surrender in time
      1. +4
        29 August 2021 15: 22
        Quote: Black
        The only thing that will help them is to surrender in time

        I agree. Yes
      2. +3
        29 August 2021 19: 27
        Quote: Black
        The only thing that will help them is to surrender in time

        The offensive of our troops from the direction of Brest to Lviv and a rush to meet it through Transnistria will be a complete surprise for the Ukrovermacht. All Banderlog will be in the cauldron, grease the heels with lard and scatter to the caches.
      3. +2
        30 August 2021 12: 56
        no. plane from Boryspil to Valinor. everything else won't save
    2. +4
      29 August 2021 15: 48
      Looks mortality. good
      1. +4
        29 August 2021 16: 08
        Will the S-300V1 and S-300PS air defense systems help Kiev?

        Will a poultice help a dead man?
        1. +6
          29 August 2021 16: 33
          Interesting - how old ukroketam then? Go all the warranty periods were out, and even probably without proper maintenance ..
    3. +1
      29 August 2021 16: 37
      In the 90s, Ukraine sold the S-300V complex to the Yankes.
      For a quarter of a century, specialists from "Raytheon" could definitely offer options for modernizing "Antey" to Ukrainian "colleagues" from "Aerotechnics-MLT".
      1. +7
        29 August 2021 17: 51
        Quote: knn54
        In the 90-s Ukraine sold the S-300V complex to the Yankes.

        Not great accuracy
        At the end of December 1994, an An-124 Ruslan heavy transport aircraft delivered a secret cargo to the Redstone Air Force Base (Alabama). The next day, a sensational article appeared in the Washington Post, which argued that this cargo was nothing more than components of the newest Russian S-300 system. sold by Belarus through the state-owned company Beltechexport... In a series of subsequent publications, it was said that the deal was carried out bypassing Moscow and inflicting incomparable damage to it. The Russian press concluded that Moscow's strategic partner Minsk sold itself to the West for thirty pieces of silver (specifically, for $ 6 million),
        1. +6
          29 August 2021 18: 58
          as components of the newest Russian system S-300, sold by Belarus through the state-owned company Beltechexport.

          Quite right, this was even before Luka, under Shushkevich.
          1. +3
            29 August 2021 21: 17
            Quote: Aviator_
            Quite right, this was even before Luka, under Shushkevich.

            Alexander G. Lukashenko President and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Belarus with July 20 1994 year.
        2. -1
          30 August 2021 16: 33
          Yes, I sold it to RB, but not bypassing Moscow, but at the request of Moscow. In Moscow, then the scandal with an attempt to sell a train of tanks outside Russia did not subside (to whom I can no longer remember). Therefore, the assistance of Belarus was required in order not to irritate the "too curious" deputies of the Russian Supreme Soviet.
      2. +2
        31 August 2021 15: 41
        They could not repeat for themselves, what kind of modernization is there for ...
        inhabitants of the twilight territory laughing
    4. +7
      29 August 2021 17: 12
      In general, they say that a Russian officer shot down a high-speed Chinese target, the only one in this competition, of six teams. The Chinese manufacturer of MANPADS for the Chinese team is probably already getting luli, with all the Chinese proletarian hatred.
      1. -3
        29 August 2021 18: 23
        Quote: tralflot1832
        Generally they say the Russian officer shot down

        The MANPADS operator is the maximum sergeant position (it seems that the guys from the battalion in Tambov were sent to shoot), I don't understand what the officer was doing there ...
        1. +2
          30 August 2021 14: 13
          Quote: Lara Croft
          MANPADS operator is the maximum sergeant position

          Quote: Lara Croft
          I don’t understand what the officer was doing there ...


          And this officer, most likely an instructor, of those very sergeants-operators)))
          1. -4
            30 August 2021 20: 18
            Quote: Harry.km
            And this officer, most likely an instructor, of those very sergeants-operators)))

            Why the hell, such an instructor, if the students are afraid to send them to the war games ...
            1. +2
              30 August 2021 20: 21
              Quote: Lara Croft
              Why the hell, such an instructor, if the students are afraid to send them to the war games ...


              Well, in fact, these are not military exercises, but rather demonstration performances and even international ones. In La Bourget, non-combatant pilots also fly ...
              1. -1
                30 August 2021 20: 25
                Quote: Harry.km
                In La Bourget, non-combatant pilots also fly ...

                We have yes ...., in "red arrows", for example, every three years the flight crew of the aerobatic team changes, the best combat pilots get into the aerobatic team according to the competition, the second time in the aerobatic team it is impossible to get into the aerobatic team ...
      2. 0
        15 February 2022 10: 42
        oh well, the only one, in his case, the so-called "direct hit" and the explosion of the warhead from the SKDC were recorded. for the rest of the teams, the missile normally fired at the target from the non-contact target sensor. with high-speed it's like with analogues, it's ridiculous.
    5. +4
      29 August 2021 18: 17
      Ross42-in Soviet times, in the army for such a defeat of a target, they could give either stripes, or even 15 days of vacation, more often it was the second, and the first, when there were inspectors at the launches!
      1. +2
        29 August 2021 18: 31
        Quote: Thrifty
        Soviet times in the army for such a defeat of the target could be given either stripes, or even 15 days of vacation

        Yes It was, I remember ... the Commanders of the Army (artillery) and above loved such rewards immediately after the launches ...
      2. 0
        15 February 2022 19: 53
        Were there such targets in Soviet times? lol
    6. -16
      30 August 2021 05: 57
      And what is the merit of the Russian officer?
      That his rocket turned out to be in good working order and fulfilled the algorithm laid down in it?
      So he has nothing to do with it, he was just lucky.
      1. +5
        31 August 2021 11: 09
        Why, then, was everyone else unlucky? Missiles were given to them defective? Or is it all the same that the launch had to be performed at a precisely calculated moment, so that the missile, after capturing the target, could hit it?
  2. 0
    29 August 2021 15: 45
    Hack and predictor Aviator
    A pair of divisions of promising Iskander-M missile systems will be quite enough to disable almost all illumination and guidance radars of the S-300V1, S-300PS and Buk-M1 air defense systems, which are in service with the Ukrainian Air Force. "

    The conclusion amused, of course. Iskander against radars ... Is the Kh-31P not good?
    1. 0
      29 August 2021 16: 20
      Do not spoil porridge with butter))
  3. +3
    29 August 2021 15: 52
    The S-300V1 air defense system is the same as the S-300V ... and there is no 9M82-1 air defense missile (!) ... there is a 9M82 air defense system!
  4. +2
    29 August 2021 15: 57
    Will they help? No.
    Give us trouble? Yes
    1. -1
      29 August 2021 16: 13
      Quote: Cron
      Will they help? No.
      Give us trouble? Yes


      You see in them haphazard air defense BIG problem?

      1. -1
        29 August 2021 17: 49
        Do you see their haphazard air defense as a BIG problem?

        I didn't write this problem big or not. To be honest, I don’t know. But the fact that she will cause some problems, I'm sure
        1. -2
          29 August 2021 18: 20
          Quote: Cron
          that she will cause some problems, I'm sure


          It is clear of course that there will be problems Yes ...

          Time and ammunition problems to suppress their air defense.
      2. -2
        29 August 2021 18: 43
        Quote: PiK
        Do you see their haphazard air defense as a BIG problem?

        Where is the confidence that the Ukrainian Armed Forces has a haphazard air defense system? Data directly from the "aquarium" or the GRU General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation?
        1. -5
          29 August 2021 20: 00
          Quote: Ingenegr
          Where is the confidence that the Ukrainian Armed Forces has a haphazard air defense system? Data directly from the "aquarium" or the GRU General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation?

          Well, you screwed it up - "haphazard system" wassat And data is data ...
      3. -3
        30 August 2021 06: 06
        Quote: PiK
        Do you see their haphazard air defense as a BIG problem?

        And in 2008, was the air defense system in Georgia or not in your understanding?
        However, the problems were also very big, having shot down our strategic bomber and a little more simple.
        1. 0
          30 August 2021 06: 14
          Quote: Jacket in stock
          However, the problems were also very big, knocking down our strategic bomber and a little more simpler.


          When is that long range bomber Tu-22 M3 became strategic?


          Quote: Jacket in stock
          And in 2008, was the air defense system in Georgia or not in your understanding?


          In my understanding, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and the Aerospace Forces are far from the level of 08.08.08 ...
        2. +1
          30 August 2021 13: 34
          Quote: Jacket in stock

          And in 2008, was the air defense system in Georgia or not in your understanding?
          However, the problems were also very big, having shot down our strategic bomber and a little more simple.

          In 2008, Georgia faced a systemic air defense of Georgia and haphazard planning on our part.
          The mere fact that the main and paramount task of the Air Force in all operations of the past 60 years - reconnaissance and suppression of air defense - has been completely forgotten, says a lot. In fact, the Georgian air defense system worked in greenhouse conditions for the first three days - it was taken up only after the losses suffered by the Air Force. Prior to that, the same surveillance radar station in Gori (practically on the front line) was targeting the Georgians throughout South Ossetia and further north, over the ridge.

          Under normal planning, the Gori radar station would have been forced into peace even before the 135 MTR passed through the Roki tunnel.
          However, there is another option - the traditional mess in the Air Force. They wrote that in spite of all the exercises, preparations for the "rescue of peacekeepers" and cheerful reports in the "always ready" style, the working "phantasmagorias" appeared only on August 10th.
  5. -1
    29 August 2021 16: 39
    Will we really defeat the APU? Quite unexpectedly from Damantsev.
  6. -10
    29 August 2021 16: 49
    "it will be quite enough to disable practically all illumination and guidance radars of the S-300V1, S-300PS and Buk-M1 air defense systems,"

    So it was clear before.
    If we peacefully smash the insidiously defending ukrov, then they will not do anything.
    Moreover, the media have already been promoting "about an attack" 3 times, but the Ukrainians did not show up again.

    The Wiki contains a list of those shot down in the LDNR, and it seems that they are not insurgents. And without any C300.
    1. +2
      29 August 2021 20: 25
      Moreover, the media have already been promoting "about an attack" 3 times, but the Ukrainians did not show up again.

      As they did not appear, and how they have been fighting for 7 years, heroically defending the city of Kyiev, ​​they did not appear, but they are defending lol
      1. -4
        29 August 2021 20: 34
        But this is such a tricky tactic.
        Have you seen the photos of Grozny and Staligrad? after....
        There, the sides did not supply coal, fuel oil, titanium, aluminum, potatoes to each other ...

        And here: "You need to rejoice" - the immortal from the President ...
        1. 0
          29 August 2021 21: 12
          Have you seen the photos of Grozny and Staligrad? after....

          What year do you mean?

          There, the sides did not supply coal, fuel oil, titanium, aluminum, potatoes to each other ...


          I hope they did not supply this list through Slovakia, but if not, then this does not count wink

          And here: "You need to rejoice" - the immortal from the President ...

          Not not not, immortal from the president, this "anti-terrorist operation cannot and will not last two or three months. It should last hours." (P.A. Poroshenko)
          wink
          1. -3
            30 August 2021 00: 36
            1) old, old ... post-war
            2) Exactly, it does not count. Money doesn't smell
            3) Poroshenko's promises are like the promises of Honduras. Nobody picks them up ...
    2. 0
      29 August 2021 23: 37
      last time the trousers are washed
    3. +2
      30 August 2021 08: 56
      Where did they not appear? They are already there. And the only restraining factor for them is the factos of the RF Armed Forces. Didn't you know? Although, you are reading Wiki .. well, then there are no questions. There is also a Ukrainian Crimean Bridge, and indeed an alternative reality in some places. In general, if you feel comfortable there - good health
  7. 0
    29 August 2021 17: 25
    A pair of divisions of promising Iskander-M missile systems, consisting of 8 complexes (with 32 operational-tactical BR 9M723-1) will be quite enough to disable almost all illumination and guidance radars of the S-300V1, S-300PS and Buk-M1 air defense systems ", Which are in service with the Air Force of Ukraine.

    It will help if you declare war on Ukraine.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +8
    29 August 2021 18: 03
    What the conversation is about is not clear. The storage periods for all missiles in the country 404 have expired. If anyone does not understand, I tried to shoot rotten rockets. A dangerous activity for the crew and the surrounding infrastructure.
  10. +7
    29 August 2021 22: 33
    Chital and mourn))) "dozens of divisions of MLRS BM - 21 and BM - 27")))) divisions BM - 21, very incomplete are available only in mechanized brigades and there are clearly not dozens of them))) "Hurricanes" and "Tornadoes" brought together in two ORAP. And this is fffsёёё))) the presence of b / c to them is also a big question. About the air defense missile system is even more fun))) I will reveal to citizen Damantsev, a terrible military secret - last time I bought a missile defense system for the S - 300, either in 2002 or 2003, and not for all complexes, but only for several. As far as I know, the S-300 missiles have a guaranteed service life of 10 years. After that, the TPK is removed from the PU and sent to the plant. Those. the newest missiles have long expired, and what happens when you press the "Start" button, even Shukhevych will not say)))
    1. -4
      30 August 2021 06: 10
      Quote: TermNachTER
      service life -10 years. After that, the TPK is removed from the PU and sent to the plant. Those. the newest missiles have long expired all terms

      Why are you sure that the Ukrainians did not do THAT? They have factories.
      1. +3
        30 August 2021 08: 43
        SAM was produced in Russia. How can you do something with such a dangerous thing as a rocket, if you do not have the necessary equipment and equipment, but even technical documentation?
        1. -4
          30 August 2021 09: 17
          Quote: TermNachTER
          there is no necessary equipment and equipment, but even technical documentation?

          And where did the documentation go?
          It's not a problem to make the rig, they didn't do that. And they also have where to get new components, as well as new rocket fuel, they did it all during the Soviet era.
          1. +3
            30 August 2021 10: 02
            The documentation remained at the factory. In the divisions, everything was simple - they disconnected the cables, removed the TPK from the PU. The new TPK was put on the PU, the cables were connected. We checked the functioning - that's all. Nobody climbed inside the TPK. Where did they get their components? Where does the fuel come from? If you are talking about the Pavlograd plant, it has long been in a half-killed state, and it also made fuel for completely different missiles.
            1. -3
              30 August 2021 11: 04
              Quote: TermNachTER
              Everything was simple in the divisions

              At the start, yes.
              Everything was in the technical, both the equipment and the documents.
              Native components are not even obligatory, and they make the autopilot and the GOS themselves, it is not so difficult to replace the standard one, it is not a question for them at all to upgrade the radar and SNR, they sell this to the whole world.
              They seem to have decided about rocket fuel, too, Alder and Thunder and Neptune are flying.
              So not everything is as hopeless as we would like.
              1. +4
                30 August 2021 18: 00
                Are you saying that TPK was opened in the technical divisions? And who then closed and pumped the inert gas? Banderlyand sells the radar station of NPO Iskra, by the way, everything is Soviet development, there is nothing new. Thunder, Alder, etc. flies in videos))) really has not yet been seen.
              2. +1
                31 August 2021 10: 30
                that is, they have all the components for the S-300? Why don't they release their complexes then?
                1. -2
                  31 August 2021 11: 20
                  Quote: sifgame
                  Why don't they release their complexes then?

                  Well, maybe not all. Yes, and it costs money, and then, thank God, there is no money.
  11. +3
    30 August 2021 06: 47
    The largest state. the secret of Ukraine is how many anti-aircraft missile divisions are actually in the Armed Forces, both in the Ovitryanny Forces (Air Force) and in the Army Air Defense Forces. Figures from 50 to 18 divisions are named, the latter is more likely. Most likely, with the collapse of the USSR, supplies stopped and all the anti-aircraft missiles of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were clearly delayed. Even taking into account the large margin of safety of Soviet weapons and military equipment (remember the case of the destruction of the TU-154 by the old Ukrainian S-200 due to the complete moronism of the crew), where the UkrZURs will fly and whether they will fly at all is a big question. An indirect sign of this is the detention on the territory of the Russian Federation and conviction under the article for espionage from the heels of Ukrogonts who tried to get secret boards for air defense systems at the enterprises of the Russian defense industry. In the event that the Armed Forces of Ukraine decide on a bloody massacre in Donbass, not to mention an attempt to attack the territory of the Russian Federation, a number of experts offer a simple scenario for neutralizing the ukroPO. : in the Russian Federation there are generally serviceable samples of obsolete weapons and military equipment: hundreds of one and a half OTR "Tochka" ("Tochka - U"), thousands of aviation KR Kh-55 and others, hundreds of KR Navy starting from P-15, P-35, P- 270, P-700, etc., a simultaneous mass launch of them is carried out not even for specific targets, but simply towards the airspace of Ukraine, thereby creating redundancy of targets, the enemy will have to turn on everything, including reserve air defense radars, and in fact use a small supply of conditionally serviceable missiles idle. And after that, the remaining serviceable air defense systems, means of fire destruction of the Ground Forces of the Armed Forces of the OTRK "Tochka" type, MLRS and artillery of 203 and 152 mm caliber, as well as the existing 5 arsenals of weapons and 5 main airfields with a meager number of serviceable aircraft and helicopters are destroyed by OTRK strikes. " Iskander-M "and hypersonic" Daggers "and" Zircons ", from which the Armed Forces of Ukraine are virtually defenseless. I would add critical infrastructure here: 5 bridges across the Dnieper, a number of points of state and military administration, 5 basic distribution substations of power grids (nuclear power plants, hydroelectric power plants, thermal power plants themselves cannot be hit, well, at least for environmental reasons), base warehouses of fuels and lubricants, etc. NS. And after that, the "beating up of babies" begins with the use of Caliber naval missile launchers, Iskander-K ground missile launchers, Kh-101 aviation missiles, etc. (without entering the airspace of Ukraine). All this will take only a few hours, and no tank columns are needed, the Armed Forces will scatter on their own.
    1. +2
      30 August 2021 09: 22
      Eck you swung ...
      Bridges ... Zircons ...
      A couple of snipers in Kiev and make it clear that this is how it began.
      1. +2
        31 August 2021 10: 36
        Even simpler, everything can be done on the territory of the Russian Federation to make a stuffing in the networks and TV with video echelons of the most different military equipment, supposedly in Ukraine. A few months ago, someone posted a video of a Ukrainian echelon of tanks supposedly Russian, but they themselves almost crap themselves.
      2. 0
        1 September 2021 15: 41
        A couple of snipers in Kiev won't solve anything.
        Instead of some, others will come to power.
    2. 0
      30 August 2021 23: 20
      Quote: Popov I.P.
      All this will take only a few hours, and no tank columns are needed, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will scatter on their own.

      tank columns are needed! or rather chains ... by what, and where will they run? if to the Poles, then this is their problem, but if to us?
    3. 0
      1 September 2021 22: 23
      Quote: Popov I.P.
      The APU will scatter themselves.

      Oh, guys, it's better to OVEREvaluate a potential enemy and play it safe than to UNDERSTAND.
  12. +3
    30 August 2021 07: 18
    Sofa expert Damantsev came up with a nonexistent theater of military operations - Eastern European conventional wassat
  13. +1
    30 August 2021 09: 50
    You can simply, through the social network, announce an award for the damage to the air defense system ...
    1. +3
      31 August 2021 10: 43
      why spend money, you can simply declare how much palladium gold is in microcircuits, capacitors and connectors in the electronic blocks of these complexes))))
      1. 0
        31 August 2021 10: 44
        it can be done in parallel ...
  14. 0
    5 September 2021 17: 14
    S300 without cover of complexes such as Tor, Pantsir, Buk, on level ground, with satellite intelligence of Russia, this is a useless pile of scrap metal, the work of suppression means for a couple of hours of processing.
  15. 0
    15 February 2022 10: 27
    Damantsev again turns readers' heads with TTX numbers and abbreviations laughing
  16. 0
    15 February 2022 10: 29
    the Ukrainian BukM1 division in Georgia in 2008 could not be crushed either by interference or means of destruction. I hope the conclusions from the warriors 080808 are made.
  17. 0
    21 February 2023 19: 46
    Well, how did it work? Are all radars out of order? APU themselves fled?