Armor for combat
Siege of Obenton (1340). Miniature from Jean Froissard's Chronicle. Copy from Bruges, Belgium, circa 1470-1475 National Library of France, Paris. Well, just a very interesting miniature, isn't it? The besieged throw benches, stools, stones and pitchers on the heads of the besiegers, and shoot them with crossbows. The besiegers rolled up a double-barreled cannon to the wall and shoot at the defenders from bows and powerful crossbows with an "English gate". One of the crossbowmen in the foreground has full plate foot cover, but the rest of the shooters have knee pads at best. For many, the protection of the torso is covered with fabric, that is, it is clearly either a jacque or a brigandine. Heavily armed infantry at arms wait in line to attack the enemy. Some of them have already entered into battle with the defenders of the barbican, who opened the gates and rushed to the sortie. Note that everyone has helmets on their heads ...
He put chain mail on him
and put a bronze helmet on his head.
17 Samuel 38:XNUMX
Military story countries and peoples. To begin with, I read the comments to one of the previous materials and noticed that one of the readers wrote that he was tired of ceremonial armor and wanted about combat ... and about those who used them. The latter is a separate and very complex topic. Regarding the first wish, we can say that it was precisely in that material that the ceremonial armor was not there! Which is easy to establish by the presence of either a lance hook on the cuirass, or holes for fastening it. They did not put it on the front ones. Why carry an extra load on yourself? And the fact that armor over time began to be richly decorated, and even military, let it not surprise anyone. To know and to know in order to emphasize with all his might his superiority over commoners.
Here, for example, is a fairly richly decorated equestrian set from the Army Museum in Paris. Is it combat or ceremonial? Take a closer look: a spear hook is visible under the shoulder pad, and if so, then it is certainly a combat one. Photo by the author
Everything is mixed in this exposition: in the center - tournament armor, but on the right - obviously the armor of the "Tudor era", which belonged either to the cuirassier or to the reitar, and with an "anima" cuirass, that is, it is somewhere in 1570! And since there are no holes for a lance hook on the cuirass, it is obvious that the main weapons pistols served him. Army Museum. Photo by the author
And here is another cuirass of the same type and time, but there are holes for a lance hook on it. And since it is decorated with a golden notch, it means this one thing that someone who commanded a detachment of horse spearmen wore it. And it is quite possible that he also had a pistol in a holster, to the left of the saddle, but his main weapon was still a spear! Army Museum. Photo by the author
Well, let's look at the tournament armor of 1560. And they look so that it is possible to determine when they are made only by ... a plate glove on the right hand. Just like this, and it was at this time that riders-pistoliers began to use, well, all previous samples immediately went out of fashion! Army Museum. Photo by the author
And now let's remember what has been written here on the pages of VO more than once: armor XIV is a rarity. Armor XIII is an even greater rarity, and even further into the depths of the centuries, the finds of armor that museums can boast of can be counted on one hand - they simply have not survived!
Also, the knight's armor was expensive. And therefore they were more often preserved. In the same castles. As a memory and as interior details. The infantryman's armor was lighter, simpler and cheaper. And where would he keep them, even if he became their master? I would sell it right there, of course. And I would go to war - I got new ones!
In one of the documents, for example, we read that in 1372 a certain Liber Borrein - a fairly wealthy militia from modern Belgium - went to fight in a chain mail shirt with a collar and a mantle, in a bascinet with a visor and an aventail, having plate mittens, as well as bracers and hard leather leggings. However, this was clearly not a peasant, but a burgher. This was within his means!
Around the same time, crossbowmen, who were usually recruited into the same French army in Provence, and pavezier shield-bearers could have a helmet - a servillera or a bascinet, as well as a lamellar shell (plates), often supplemented by a "gipponus" or even a small chain mail (pansiere). Faudes (faudes), and poacher's plate shoulder pads (braconniére), or a chain collar could be attached to the chain mail. But only a few had combat mittens (gantelets, ghants) or leather mittens (manicae), or wrists (brasales) to protect the hands and forearms.
Well, the weapon of the French crossbowman was a crossbow, a relatively light sword (ensis), and they were covered with light shields (eusis or spato), and a dagger (couteau), some of them were covered with small shields (bloquerium).
Pavezier - a warrior with a pavese shield, was armed with a spear and a dagger or mantlet. Only a very few had a sword. The Provencal light infantryman "brigand" had a servilier helmet, bascinet or a brimmed chapel, and the few who had armor wore a jacque (a quilted jacket lined with metal or bone plates) or chain mail. They did not have shields, since they performed the functions of foot skirmishers in the troops.
This is approximately what a soldier looks like in all this equipment. And not an equestrian warrior, but an infantryman! Army Museum. Photo by the author
Weapons and armor were produced on the stream, in particular by the large arms manufactory at Clos de Galle in Rouen. So, in 1376, in only one arsenal in Chaumbre de la Reine, up to a thousand sets of battle armor were stored, although their description said that they were outdated and of poor quality.
Eight later, the king of France made an order for the manufacture of bascinets, boucliers, bracelets, bras de plate, chapeau de fer, quilted cottes, cuissots, heraldic shields (ecus), patches écussons, mittens (gantelots), bracers (garde-brass), plate collars (gorgerettes, gorgiéres), shells (harnois), shortened chain mail (haubergiers), large helmets (heaumes), aketons, jackets , paveses, plates and targes. Each set of armor weighed at least 25 pounds (about 6 kg), and each bascinet weighed at least 4 pounds (over 1,6 kg).
Another order, received in 1384, for 17 gold francs, was for the production of 200 crossbow arrows, the repair of armor, horse harness and artillery.
Some armor makers and arms dealers have made deals with colleagues overseas. Such a deal was concluded in 1375 by the craftsmen Guitard de Ginqueres from Bordeaux and Lambert Braque from Germany. They agreed to cooperate in the delivery of 60 bascinets and shells to the castle of the Comte de Foix in Morlas. The most detailed evidence of this deal comes from the archives of Datini, a merchant from Prato (Italy) who was a key figure in the arms trade in Avignon at the end of the XNUMXth century. Here weapons and armor were sold and resold both wholesale and retail, and the same trader sold both ours and yours, and this did not surprise or outrage anyone at all, although it was still very far from "damned capitalism".
And, of course, chain mail was still in use, as evidenced by the same exhibits from the Wallace Collection.
For example, a chain mail from Augsburg, Germany, dating from the end of the XIV - the beginning of the 73,7th century, that is, it is an artifact of great rarity and value. The length is 1,11 cm. The diameter of her rings is 4 cm, and the weight is 479 kg. The Wallace Collection. London
Note that, contrary to popular belief, chain mail was never replaced with plate armor. Chain mail was worn not only by knights in armor, but also by archers, gunners and infantry of a lower rank. Thus, good chain mail could be inherited from its original owner, passed from hand to hand many times, and continued to be worn as long as it was considered useful.
One of the many reasons why chain mail was so widely used for such a long period (in Europe, more than 2000 years, from about the XNUMXrd century BC to the XNUMXth century AD), was that the chain mail could be easily repaired, restored or remodel. Even if it was badly torn, the damage could be quickly repaired and then reused.
Second-hand chain mail remained in use for a century or more, after which it was usually cut into separate chain mail sleeves and "skirts" (commonly called "paunces"), which were then worn with full plate armor. For this reason, apart from old age, full chain mail shirts from the early period are extremely rare today.
Chain mail of the mid-71,1th century. Length: 0,991 cm. Diameter of rings: 9,015 cm. Weight: XNUMX kg. The Wallace Collection. London
It is almost certain that this specimen at one time had sleeves either to the elbow or to the wrist. But at the end of the XNUMXth century, full chain mail shirts became more and more obsolete, and many of the old chain mail had their sleeves cut off. But the chainmail sleeves themselves were worn with full plate armor throughout the XNUMXth and even the XNUMXth centuries. The lamellar armor itself had by this time become thick enough to render the chain mail behind it obsolete, but chain mail was still required to close the "slits" in the armor in the armpits and on the inside of the elbows. Moreover, it did not add a lot of excess weight!
It should be remembered that, contrary to popular modern misconceptions, armor manufacturers and wearers were more than aware of the need to avoid excessive weight that would tire the warrior wearing them or affect his mobility.
Chain mail of the 63,5th century with copper edging. Low carbon steel and copper alloy. Length: 0,506 cm. Diameter of rings: 7,966 cm. Weight: 5 kg. It is important to note that this shirt appears to be composed of pieces of other chain mail, using very small rings, less than XNUMX mm in outer diameter. The conclusion that the chain mail is made from scrap materials is made on the basis of the quality of the rings. They are different in different parts of it, although the diameter is the same. In a uniform chain mail shirt, this would not have happened. Thin chain mail was then used not only for military purposes, but also (especially during the Renaissance) for duels, and as protection against secret attacks. Such "secret" armor could be easily covered with cloth or simply worn under other clothes, which made it difficult to see that a person was wearing armor. On the other hand, some daring duelists, especially in Italy, openly wore chain mail, opposing themselves to society - "and we are!" The Wallace Collection. London
The head was also covered with chain mail.
Here is a chainmail headpiece from the 0,624th or 0,59th century. Diameter: XNUMX cm.Weight: XNUMX kg. The Wallace Collection. London
Used, and very widely, chain mail collars, often with double weaving. This was often the only defense for both the infantryman and the horseman.
Chain collar-mantle of the 0,85th century. Iron or steel and copper alloy. Weight: XNUMX kg. The Wallace Collection. London
And this is how the same individual sleeves looked like that were worn under the all-metal "white armor" (and not only white). XV – XVI century. Copper alloy. Length: 90 cm.Diameter: 0,549 cm.Weight: 1,94 kg
In the XIX century in many European museums were made ... replicas of the rarest ancient armor. If only, as they say, “show them to the most respectable public”! Today it is also an interesting artifact. These chain mail pants, for example, are made of wire with a diameter of 0,086 cm, the diameter of the rings is 1,06 cm, and their weight is 6,44 kg. The Wallace Collection. London
Chain-mail cape, called the "mantle of the bishop". Germany. XVI century. Size: 68,5 cm, front. Rings diameter: 0,75 cm.Weight: 4,426 kg. This cape did not have sleeves, but it was simple to manufacture. They were worn by both infantrymen and horsemen of light cavalry, for example, the French Huguenots and petty German princes. The Wallace Collection. London
French crossbowman during the Hundred Years War. On the head of the chaplain, the torso protects the brigandine, lined with metal plates. Nearby is a small shield for self-defense. Army Museum. Photo by the author
Well, and about other accessories of "equipment for combat" of those distant years, we will tell here next time ...
To be continued ...
Information