The naval aviation of the Russian Navy will receive a new high-speed anti-ship missile

Russian maritime aviation will receive a new aviation anti-ship missile, the development of a new ammunition has already started. This was announced by Boris Obnosov, Director General of the Tactical Missile Armament Corporation.

According to the general director of KTRV, the creation of a new promising anti-ship missile system is already underway, today the development is at the stage of development work. Of course, he did not give any details about the new rocket, he only said that the new rocket would differ from those already in service with increased flight range, speed and increased noise immunity.

(...) conducts research and development work on the creation of a high-speed anti-ship missile system of a new generation (...) a promising model will supplement the existing nomenclature of aviation weapons created by the corporation

- leads TASS Obnosov's words.

Earlier, the general director of KTRV announced the start of serial production of the newest aviation anti-submarine missile APR-3ME. The ammunition is designed to destroy enemy submarines, the missile is unified for use with anti-submarine aircraft such as Tu-142ME, Il-38, helicopters of the Ka-28 type. The first batch of serial missiles has already entered service with the naval aviation of the Russian Navy.

Comments

[The leader of the Redskins]

GOP!
I said it first!
Ah ... Haven't you jumped yet? ...
Well, okay, no getting used to ...

[Alex_1973]

Chief of the Redskins (Nazarius)
GOP!
I said it first!
Ah ... Haven't you jumped yet? ...
Well, okay, no getting used to ...

AND? What's your bunch for? Just to fart first?

[The leader of the Redskins]

The bunch is the title of the article, which says that will get into service although design work is still underway.

[hrych]

There are projects of Sharpness and Gremlin. Taking into account the successes of Zircon with a ramjet engine and a Dagger with a turbojet engine, you shouldn't gop. There will undoubtedly be an aviation version of the Zircon, this is partly even easier than ship-based, no starting stage is needed, and a reduced Dagger is also a feasible task for our engineers.

[Orange bigg]

There will certainly be an aviation version of the Zircon

It just will not be, since Zircon is too heavy for aircraft based. There is a project GZUR hypersonic guided missile aircraft-based, just with lifting weight for aircraft-based. So there is no point in making an aviation version of the heavier Zircon.

... In 2022, tests of the small-sized hypersonic missile Ostrota will begin, which are to be received by the Russian supersonic fighter-bomber Su-34 and the missile-carrier bomber with variable sweep wing Tu-22M3.


The new rocket will receive a product 71 ramjet engine.

“Hypersonic missiles for modern air defense systems are almost invulnerable targets, they are very difficult, almost impossible to shoot down. Accordingly, if such an effective weapon is created for one type of aviation, then it is logical to use it on long-range aviation aircraft. Using this ammunition, they will be able to clear their way, destroying air defense systems, making breakthroughs in the interests of strategic operations, ”said military expert Dmitry Kornev.

The Tu-22M3 is to receive the Gremlin hypersonic missile, compared to which the Ostrota will have a shorter range.

https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5f0aee12415b5c66d550639f/tu-22-i-su-34-voorujat-novymi-malogabaritnymi-giperzvukovymi-raketami-60a76fec52636e385a488bc3

[hrych]

First, the Indians blabbed about the hypersonic Brahmos-2. We also have Onyx / Bramos airborne. From the footage we saw that Zircon is a hypersonic version on the Onyx platform.

[tlauicol]

We do not have an aviation Onyx. There are promises for 20 years.

[hrych]

Oh well. Onyx is not, but Brahmos is. What smart Indians, however.

[tlauicol]

Well done, of course, only 16 years old ate breakfasts.
And they still feed us.

[hrych]

Firstly, Onyx is absolutely universal, in the nomenclature of the mobile Bastion, airborne ships and imagine ... aviation. Throw it off the plane, what's the problem?

[tlauicol]

We need a plane and equipment.

[hrych]

Those. for the Indians they managed to make our rocket with the equipment, for our own production of the aircraft, but couldn’t for ourselves? Those. Aviation Brahmos serves faithfully for India, but at home they slurp cabbage soup with bast shoes?

[tlauicol]

Could or could not, the main thing - did not do and do not do

[Vol4ara]

Quote: OrangeBigg

There will certainly be an aviation version of the Zircon

It just will not be, since Zircon is too heavy for aircraft based. There is a project GZUR hypersonic guided missile aircraft-based, just with lifting weight for aircraft-based. So there is no point in making an aviation version of the heavier Zircon.

... In 2022, tests of the small-sized hypersonic missile Ostrota will begin, which are to be received by the Russian supersonic fighter-bomber Su-34 and the missile-carrier bomber with variable sweep wing Tu-22M3.


The new rocket will receive a product 71 ramjet engine.

“Hypersonic missiles for modern air defense systems are almost invulnerable targets, they are very difficult, almost impossible to shoot down. Accordingly, if such an effective weapon is created for one type of aviation, then it is logical to use it on long-range aviation aircraft. Using this ammunition, they will be able to clear their way, destroying air defense systems, making breakthroughs in the interests of strategic operations, ”said military expert Dmitry Kornev.

The Tu-22M3 is to receive the Gremlin hypersonic missile, compared to which the Ostrota will have a shorter range.

https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5f0aee12415b5c66d550639f/tu-22-i-su-34-voorujat-novymi-malogabaritnymi-giperzvukovymi-raketami-60a76fec52636e385a488bc3

"Evasion maneuvers are difficult against hypersonic weapons because the weapons themselves are highly maneuverable."
Never give links to Yandex Zen again, you can just as well give links to tik tok

[Nikolaevich I]

Well, maybe, in fact, "Sharpness" and "Gremlin" are somewhat different "products"! But one thing is clear that the "base" for them was the "product" called from the very beginning GZUR!

[Barberry25]

Well, their base is Zircon, and both missiles are adapted versions in the style of "reduce the size" .. Gremlin is up to 1,5 tons to hang on the Su-34 and the external suspension of the Tu-22m3m, and the sharpness is a mini-version of Gremlin, so that put it in the drum ... it remains only to develop a version up to 500 kg, so that launches can be made and hung on everything at 500-600 km ..

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: Barberry25

Well, their base is Zircon, and both missiles are adapted versions in the "reduce the size" style ..

Well, "Zircon" cannot be a "base" in any way ... !! GZUR is a "product" in itself!

[Barberry25]

those. having the experience of creating one rocket in the design bureau, will they do everything in a new way instead of miniaturization?

[Orange bigg]

Quote: Barberry25

those. having the experience of creating one rocket in the design bureau, will they do everything in a new way instead of miniaturization?

Various design bureaus are developing. One design bureau is developing the Zircon, and the other design bureau is developing air-launched hypersonic missiles. This division of development since the days of the Union.

[Barberry25]

separation, yes, but the competence is similar, which allows taking decisions into account and not marking time in one place

[seregatara1969]

But for me, you need to release a slow rocket so that for twenty minutes it cuts around the same defender and then bang into the side! To have time to think about the inevitable. To understand the service to the very liver. It is not the attack itself that is terrible, but its expectation.

[hrych]

Loitering drones in the X-35, why not. And better with a short-range solid-propellant anti-ship missile system. Interesting Petrel, then. that he can patrol ... for years (in theory). Can he become a carrier of anti-ship missiles, anti-submarine mini torpedoes, etc.? And so yes, it patrols, patrolling not far from the enemy's connection, the possible location of the nuclear submarine, etc. Can he go to supersonic or faster? There are many questions, but the platform is extremely promising and it is stupid to kill him about the city and the enemy's cluster, of course, it's good, but making it a carrier is even more interesting. The same Caliber from the nomenclature carries a supersonic stage of an anti-ship missile system or a mini-torpedo.

[seregatara1969]

Here it is important that they see, that it is inevitable, that it changes the trajectory of movement, moving away from the air defense fire. So that, like a meteorite, it flew long and scary to the goal

[Orange bigg]

... SAINT PETERSBURG, June 24. / TASS /. The Tactical Missile Armament Corporation (KTRV) is working to create a new generation high-speed anti-ship missile (ASM). This was announced in an interview with TASS at the 10th International Maritime Defense Show (IMDS-2021) in St. Petersburg by the general director of the corporation Boris Obnosov.

"At present, the Tactical Missile Armament Corporation" JSC is carrying out development work to create a high-speed anti-ship missile system of a new generation with an increased range and flight speed, with increased noise immunity. This promising model will supplement the existing range of aviation weapons created by the corporation, "the head of the KTRV stressed.

https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/11739829

I wonder what kind of missile we are talking about? Hypersonic? (Sharp and Gremlin come to mind) Or is it a new generation of supersonic anti-ship missiles a la Kh-31AD?

[Barberry25]

we all hit a hypersound, so most likely we are talking about a hypersonic missile up to 1,5 tons, i.e. the same Gremlin or up to 1 ton, i.e. Sharpness ... although this may be the third option, up to 500 kg ... but hardly

[Prisoner]

By itself. Your thirty years gop. And they jump in place.

[Bez 310]

Do we really have "naval aviation" that can detect NK and use anti-ship missiles on it?

[Orange bigg]

Good morning!
The Su-30SM is in service with the Russian naval aviation.
Su-30SM is a multifunctional fighter optimized for striking ground and surface targets with guided weapons. In this case, the key is its powerful radar and the ability to use anti-ship missiles, such as the Kh-31AD, Kh-35, P-800 Onyx.
The use of the Su-34 anti-ship missiles Kh-35U.

[Bez 310]

Quote: OrangeBigg

In this case, the key are its powerful radar and the ability to use anti-ship missiles, such as the Kh-31AD, Kh-35, P-800 "Onyx".

Funny ...

[Orange bigg]

What exactly is funny to you? Or is it just funny in life?

[Bez 310]

Quote: OrangeBigg

What exactly is funny to you?

In a past life, I worked in a serious aviation company for the destruction of AUG, and it is funny for me to read that the Su-30SM is an NK destroyer. Well, about "Onyx" is also funny ...

[Orange bigg]

In a past life I worked in a serious aviation company for the destruction of AUG,

Are there such firms?

... and I find it funny to read that the Su-30SM is an NK destroyer. Well, about "Onyx" is also funny ...

Su-30MKI Indian Air Force.

... NEW DELHI, October 30 - RIA Novosti. The Indian Air Force on Friday successfully conducted a test launch of an air-launched BrahMos supersonic cruise missile from a Su-30 fighter, India TV reported, citing sources.

"The Su-30 of the Indian Air Force took off from the Halwara airbase in Punjab at about 9.00:13.30 and hit its target at about XNUMX:XNUMX after refueling in the air. This is the second such successful missile test," the source said.



It is noted that the plane covered more than 4 thousand kilometers and, after refueling in the air, destroyed the target ship located in the Bay of Bengal.

These are not the first tests of new types of weapons carried out in India in recent years. Earlier, the Indian Ministry of Defense announced successful tests of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile with a glider and upper stage made at Indian enterprises, and later successfully tested the Shaurya hypersonic short-range tactical missile and the newest SMART anti-submarine missile.

https://ria.ru/20201030/brahmos-1582377915.html

And what is Bramos? This is an export Onyx.

The Indian army has tested ground and aircraft samples of the BrahMos cruise missile, the country's Defense Ministry said. Both ammunition successfully hit the training surface targets. BrahMos is a family of supersonic missiles jointly developed by Russian and Indian specialists based on the Onyx anti-ship missile system. India produces ammunition in four versions: airborne, shipborne, underwater and land-based. Moscow and Delhi are currently working to improve the range, accuracy and speed of the missiles. It is expected that in the mid-2020s, a modernized version of the Russian-Indian missile will be able to develop hypersonic speed. Experts call BrahMos one of the most successful projects in the field of military-technical cooperation between the two countries.

https://russian.rt.com/world/article/699198-brahmos-raketa-indiya-rossiya

[Bez 310]

Quote: OrangeBigg

There are such companies? Really? ...
Su-30MKI Indian Air Force

No longer, unfortunately ... But there used to be, and they were called - MRAP.
Su-30MKI of the Indian Air Force fly in our naval aviation?
I do not believe!

[Orange bigg]

We have Su-30SM based on the Su-30MKI. So don't believe any further.

In 1996, after two years of negotiations, the first contract was signed with India for the supply of 40 fighters. Deliveries began as early as next year - fortunately, the first were supplied for temporary use in order to train flight and technical personnel simplified Su-30K, which differed from the first Su-30 mainly by the installation of a satellite navigation system. "Full" Su-30MKI began to enter service with the Indian Air Force in 2002. It was a car of a qualitatively different level - with engines with controlled thrust vector (UHT), front horizontal tail (PGO), more powerful radar and, in general, a completely updated avionics (avionics), including the integration of the best foreign elements and the broadest nomenclature of weapons, including high-precision weapons for engaging ground targets at long range.

In 2012, the first contract was signed for the supply of the Russian Aerospace Forces based on the Indian and Malaysian designs of the Su-30SM. Soon the fleet joined the ground aviation, in need of replacing the Su-27 fighters and the Su-24 coastal aviation bombers. The latter, perhaps, would be good to change for the Su-34, but, firstly, there is a great demand for them in the Aerospace Forces, and secondly, and this is a more important point, for the aviation of the fleet, especially coastal, money is allocated more likely on the residual principle. And so at least unification is obtained, and the machine itself is quite suitable not only for air defense, but also for solving anti-ship tasks. By the beginning of 2019, the Russian Aerospace Forces and the Russian Navy received a total of 114 vehicles, production will continue for at least several more years.

https://iz.ru/913090/aleksandr-ermakov/na-odnom-kryle-su-30-stanovitsia-edinym-samoletom-vvs-stran-odkb

[tlauicol]

Su30 is, Onyx is, but there is no complex. Su will not pull one, let alone three such missiles. To do this, you need to thoroughly gut the plane, turning a good fighter into ... well, in general, into a rail carrier. The Hindus agreed to fly planes, ours decided to gut Migi under the Dagger

[Orange bigg]

Well, maybe it's for the best and the sheep are safe and the wolves are fed.

[Hexenmeister]

in .. well, in general, in the rail carrier

And how much does this "rail" weigh among the Indians? And at what range are they going to actually fire it?

[Castro Ruiz]

SU-34FN / SU-32 upgrades to the level of SU-34M could operate with 1-2 Onyxes (container)

[tlauicol]

Quote: CastroRuiz

SU-34FN / SU-32 upgrades to the level of SU-34M could operate with 1-2 Onyxes (container)

No, bar holders up to 1,5 tons. It is necessary to churn the fuselage with all the consequences, and no more than one rocket in the end

[Castro Ruiz]

Well, and 1 rocket can do something. Upgrading according to the SU-34M program and the holders decides. But everything must be in order with the control center. And here the seams.

[Prisoner]

Did you sweep the inner courtyard or were you at the checkpoint?

[Bez 310]

Quote: Captive

Did you sweep the inner courtyard or were you at the checkpoint?

He swept the yard and stood at the checkpoint, like all the officers.
But he finished his service in the MRAP as a navigator of the regiment in RO.

[Prisoner]

And at the same time you dare to make global conclusions? Strong.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Captive

global findings?

About aviation anti-ship missiles, I really know something, I can draw conclusions, it would be from what. Are you a RCC specialist or commentator?

[Volder]

Quote: Bez 310

In a past life I worked for a serious aviation firm

You draw conclusions from your past life, which was long ago. This is mistake. Over the past 10 years, Russia has made a breakthrough in terms of a variety of weapons.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Volder

Over the past 10 years, Russia has made a breakthrough in terms of a variety of weapons.

In which direction did Russia rush in terms of aviation anti-ship missiles? Do we have aviation anti-ship missiles with a launch range of more than 500 km? What's new with the detection of surface targets and the issuance of the anti-ship missile center?
If you know something about this, then tell it, but only in essence, without slogans and newspaper headlines.

[Volder]

Quote: Bez 310

Do we have aviation anti-ship missiles with a launch range of more than 500 km?

What does 500 km have to do with it? Do enemy ships really have air defense with a range of 500 km?

In which direction did Russia rush in terms of aviation anti-ship missiles?

If you mean not just one Su-30SM, but Russia as a whole, then I recommend remembering the Kh-32, as well as new developments (such as "Gremlin").

What's new with the detection of surface targets and the issuance of the anti-ship missile center?

It was about the airplane and anti-ship missiles, there is no need to skip to another topic.

If you know something about this, then tell it, but only in essence, without slogans and newspaper headlines.

You are unfamiliar without any "substance", so accept the same answer.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Volder

Do enemy ships really have air defense with a range of 500 km?

Air defense zone AUG about 700 km.

Quote: Volder

I recommend remembering about the X-32

What exactly do you need to remember about her?

Quote: Volder

It was about the plane and the anti-ship missile

Without the means of the Central Control Center, an anti-ship missile with a range of more than 500 km is just a blank.

[Volder]

Quote: Bez 310

Air defense zone AUG about 700 km.

What does AUG have to do with it? The aircraft carrier on distant approaches is disabled by other means. Tactical aviation has never been positioned as a means of combating AUG.

What exactly do you need to remember about her?

In your case, you should not remember, but study.

Without the means of the Central Control Center, an anti-ship missile with a range of more than 500 km is just a blank.

How it really is - no one knows for certain due to the lack of possession of the entire completeness of information, including classified information. The USSR somehow solved this problem, and now the intelligence capabilities have increased. And for the future: if you undertake to criticize the anti-ship missiles and their carriers, then do not forget to clarify that you are actually unhappy with the control center.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Volder

And for the future

You and I have no future, because it is immediately clear that you are a professional in the destruction of NK with anti-ship missiles, you know, and you know about the decommissioning of an aircraft carrier by other means, but I just like that ...

[Volder]

Unpleasant news for you has appeared in your beloved Lenta.ru: Russia has launched the first "active" radar "Liana"

https://m.lenta.ru/news/2021/06/29/liana/

[Prisoner]

This is his hysteria.

[Pechkin]

Funny ...

You have served in the naval aviation for many years, it is impossible to more detailed commentary (I wonder) what is funny to you in this. In the video, the SU-34 is using the Kh-35, but what is the problem with the SU-30. The flight radius of the SU-30 with the X-35 will be small or something. Well, I understand no aviation "Onyx".

[Bez 310]

Quote: Pechkin

In the video, the SU-34 is using the Kh-35, but what is the problem with the SU-30.

At the landfill? No problems! Arrived, fired a rocket towards the target, flew away.

[Pechkin]

Not at the test site?

[Bez 310]

Quote: Pechkin

Not at the test site?

The target must be found, and approach it at the launch range. These missiles are launched "towards the target," and the probability of their hitting a moving, actively maneuvering target is minimal.

[Volder]

Quote: Bez 310

The target must be found, and approach it at the launch range. These missiles are launched "towards the target," and the probability of their hitting a moving, actively maneuvering target is minimal.

The probability is actually high. A target walking on water is not actively maneuvering. She just maneuvers slightly to stay on course (I mean the ship).

[Bez 310]

Quote: Volder

A target walking on water is not actively maneuvering. She just maneuvers slightly so as not to go off course (I mean the ship).

The professional is immediately visible!
I have nothing to add ...

[Volder]

I repeat once again: only rockets and aircraft can actively maneuver. Ships make slow maneuvers, preventing them from leaving the capture zone of the GOS anti-ship missile system after detecting this anti-ship missile.

[Jacket in stock]

Quote: OrangeBigg

Su-30SM is a multifunctional fighter optimized for striking ground and surface targets with guided weapons. In this case, the key is its powerful radar and the ability to use anti-ship missiles, such as the Kh-31AD, Kh-35, P-800 Onyx.

I did not serve in aviation, like OrangeBigg, I know everything from open sources, but it's really funny.
1- Su30SM cannot use P800 Onyx.
2- Su30SM does not have a powerful radar, which was finally recognized by the military. From this year, it was announced the production of the Su30 with a different, albeit not new, but definitely more powerful radar. And the existing SU30s will also be upgraded.

[Hexenmeister]

2- Su30SM does not have a powerful radar, which was finally recognized by the military.

Well as Bez 310 said

The specified missiles are launched "towards the target"

that is, by external target designation, and therefore the "power" of the radar in this case does not matter. And the modernization of the Su-30SM radar is primarily for improving performance in air combat, and secondly, a possible expansion of the list of weapons.

[Jacket in stock]

Quote: Hexenmeister

modernization of the Su-30SM radar is primarily to improve performance in air combat,

A good radar will not be superfluous in any battle.
Whoever saw whom first killed him.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Hexenmeister

that is, by external target designation

How is it?
Please tell us more if you can.

[Hexenmeister]

How is it?

Well, to start up "towards the goal", you need at least to know in which direction the goal is, it means either you need to strictly fulfill the will of your superiors (the goal is there, and your hand is in the direction of the goal), or someone else, let satellites, someone watching with sea, or from the air, in both cases, what is not external target designation, even if it is not known what accuracy? The main thing is that it does not in any way depend on the means of detection on board the carrier, and how can you find a sea target with good accuracy with your own means at a distance of under a thousand kilometers from an aircraft? You need to have a healthy flight altitude, and "too much of the correct radar."

[Bez 310]

Quote: Hexenmeister

you at least need to know in which direction the goal is

That is, you don't know ...

[Cananecat]

We are also trying to take off the tanks, but something further 3 ÷ 5 meters is still impossible. Apparently the engine is rather weak)))

[lucul]

We are also trying to take off the tanks, but something further 3 ÷ 5 meters is still impossible. Apparently the engine is rather weak)))

Do you have it in / in Ukraine, or in Haifa? )))

[Orange bigg]

Looks like Motor Sich has lobbied its engines for the Oplot tank.

[Cananecat]

Quote: lucul

Do you have it in / in Ukraine, or in Haifa? )))

With us, this is outside the Moscow Ring Road, but your pritenziya for genius is good ... it's a pity that you are stupid))

[lucul]

With us, this is outside the Moscow Ring Road,

Outside the Moscow Ring Road in Haifa? )))

[Galleon]

Russian naval aviation will receive a new aviation anti-ship missile, the development of a new ammunition has already started.

You would have started with us development of new naval aviation: PLO, AWACS ... Where to shoot blindly ??
Judging by some comments, the sect of believers in the PKR Zircon lives and flourishes regardless of any laws of physics.

[Orange bigg]

Judging by some comments, the sect of believers in the PKR Zircon lives and thrives fool in spite of any laws of physics.

The American and British military also belong to this sect. Only they won't take you there.

... in the near future, another missile of a lighter class will be adopted, the Zircon, whose speed is "only" eight Machs. But even against it, modern missile defense systems, apparently, are powerless.

This, in particular, is devoted to the material in Popular Mechanics. With reference to CNBC, the publication reports that Russia at the beginning of December carried out regular tests of the Zircon, during which the above speed was confirmed. According to American military sources, Russian designers also managed to achieve a long, stable flight, which is one of the most important problems in the development of hypersonic weapons. In addition, it is believed overseas that instead of an exclusively anti-ship missile, which the Zircon was originally conceived, it will be modified for strikes against ground targets.

https://vpk.name/news/239787_cirkon_ne_ostanovit_novaya_rossiiskaya_raketa_vstrevozhila_amerikancev.html

British officials have already expressed concern about the threat that Russian hypersonic weapons could pose to their aircraft carrier.

“Hypersonic missiles are nearly impossible to stop,” a senior British naval source told The Daily Mirror. “Without defenses against missiles like the Zircon, the British aircraft carrier would have to remain out of range, hundreds of miles at sea,” he added. "His planes will be useless, and the entire carrier strike group will be superfluous."

The true capabilities of the new weapons of Russia and China, which Moscow and Beijing can use against aircraft carriers, are still unknown, but recent tests show that the unconditional dominance of ships of this type in the oceans is coming to an end, Business Insider concludes.

https://m.gazeta.ru/army/2021/01/12/13433144.shtml

[lucul]

Judging by some comments, the sect of believers in the PKR Zircon lives and thrives fool in spite of any laws of physics.

Judging by some comments, the sect of Zircon deniers lives and flourishes, despite all the physical tests of Zircon)))

[Volder]

Quote: Galleon

the sect of believers in the PKR Zircon lives and flourishes in spite of any laws of physics.

The Americans also believe in hypersound, so they began to develop several projects related to hypersonic weapons. And Zircon really exists, whether you like it or not. After the commissioning of the Liana cruise missile, it will become easier to aim missiles at targets.

[prior]

It would also be necessary to equip the border ships with a modified Zirkonchik missile for arrogant English gentlemen. The range is not required for them.
But if anything, then so that the impudent know for sure that not only warning cannon shots await them, but also a guaranteed seabed.

[markant1970]

The titles of articles are always touched with the words: - can receive, receive, introduce, accept, etc.
May or may not receive

[Orange bigg]

Title.

The naval aviation of the Russian Navy will receive a new high-speed anti-ship missile

What are the claims?

[markant1970]

The timing is specific! When, if the development has just started?
Almost all media have such headlines.

[Orange bigg]

Can I also show you the drawings?

[markant1970]

Yes, I do not care by and large.
In the title, one could write, so and so development has begun. There is no need to anticipate events.
I am in favor of precise wording

[Volder]

Quote: markant1970

May or may not receive

Yes, despite a bunch of projects and billions of dollars injected, the United States may not get hypersonic weapons. At least in the next 5-10 years. Here you are right.

[Marachuh]

It is necessary to beat in the face with pissy rags of such upstarts. There is nothing yet, but the characteristics are already being announced. You first do it, start the series, and then declare!

[Jacket in stock]

Quote: Marachuh

There is nothing yet, but the characteristics are already announced.

If OCD has begun, then there is a terms of reference where all the characteristics are spelled out.

[Ivanushka Ivanov]

Yes, with these "they can, get it, develop it, see how it is better, improve, optimize, unify" - they really staged an ugly bum. Mythomania and kleptomania are leprosy of the modern Russian government.

[GREG68]

There will be missiles, but when will naval aviation itself be? Its quantity, and even its quality, is not yet encouraging.

[garri-lin]

I think the title should sound like this: Russia has begun the development of a new air-based anti-ship missile.

[Soldatov V.]

Here is the T-34 and "Katyusha" if so announced that would Comrade. Did Stalin do it? Until things that have no analogues are not revealed by the intelligence of the enemy, keep everything secret.

[Jacket in stock]

Quote: V.

Until things that have no analogues are not revealed by the intelligence of the enemy, keep everything secret.

Just the exact opposite.
The task of propaganda is to prevent hostilities. To do this, the enemy must be scared harder.
The technical details have not been announced. Let the enemy be afraid, and what, let him come up with.

[Soldatov V.]

From the very return of the Crimea home, they frightened the West with both of them and with daggers and armature and hypersound, so what? The English destroyer took and crossed the border and with a mockery communicated with the border guards. It was possible not to spend combat bombs on fright, but to drop a concrete model on the deck. There would be a greater effect. And so the prime minister fagot showed us a dummy without fear and reproach. At the next NATO exercises, two days later, our borders will be violated in formation. The ambassador certainly needs to be sent. Our ships should not greet this provocateur ship with a flag when they meet at sea.

[KJIETyc]

Quote: Bez 310

Quote: Hexenmeister

that is, by external target designation

How is it?
Please tell us more if you can.

And on what instruction will the harpoons be fired? and at what distance