What is the secret of Hitler's success

84
What is the secret of Hitler's success
Adolf Hitler with generals at the map at a meeting at the Berghof residence

Preparing for a new world war


The first reason for Hitler's success is the support of the so-called "world behind the scenes", the financial international, the masters of France, England and the United States.

The First World War did not solve the main task - the destruction of Russian civilization. And the construction of a "new world order" on the rubble of the old world - a stable new slave-owning civilization. It was not possible to crush Russia, and a new Russian statehood - the USSR - emerged. Moreover, the Russians offer humanity an alternative concept of development and life. Based on social justice, ethics of conscience. Creation of a society of knowledge, service and creation. Full disclosure of the spiritual, intellectual and physical potential of the person-creator. It was a terrible threat to the Western world, its masters. The Russian (Soviet) world was attractive, beautiful, and attracted the best people of mankind.



On the other hand, the development of the capitalist world is cyclical. The rise is followed by stagnation and crisis. Having plundered the German, Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman and Russian empires, as well as many small countries, the West prospered for a while. But the loot was quickly "eaten away". A new stage in the crisis of capitalism. Big business first robs its "fellow countrymen". Hundreds of thousands, millions of small and medium entrepreneurs, farmers and workers are being ruined. Millions of unemployed, poor and hungry. Terrible crime, segregation and racism. Cities are ruled by criminals and bankers.

The plutocrats themselves (the power of the rich) do not become poorer, on the contrary. But they do not even think to pull out people and countries at their own expense. They are frantically preparing new hotbeds of war, knowing that a new world war will create jobs, revive economies and, most importantly, increase their capital and power. The Great Depression pushes the United States and England to organize the Second World War. In the Far East, Japan is pushed to this, which attacks China and threatens Russia-USSR war. In Europe, first they support the fascists in Italy. However, the more powerful Germany is again the main hotbed of war there.

Already in 1922, Captain T. Smith, the assistant to the American military attaché in Germany, arrived from Berlin to the main city of Bavaria, Munich. Here he met with Adolf Hitler. After a long and thorough conversation, he drew up a detailed report for his superiors. In it he noted:

“Parliament and parliamentarism must be eliminated. He cannot rule Germany. Only a dictatorship can put Germany on its feet ... It will be better for America and England if the decisive struggle between our civilization and Marxism takes place on German soil, and not on American or English. "

This meeting did not go unnoticed.

Former German Chancellor Brüning, in his memoirs, which he allowed to publish only after his death, noted:

"One of the main factors in the rise of Hitler ... was the fact that since 1923 he received large sums of money from abroad."

Hitler and German Nazis were financed by Anglo-American capital. Thus, a hotbed of a great war in Europe was created, aimed at the East.

World War II - the blow of the USA and England to Russia and Germany


They help Hitler create a powerful party, storm trooper detachments, and take power in Germany.

The Fuehrer is given the opportunity to break the Versailles agreements without consequences, create and develop full-fledged armed forces and the military-industrial complex. The Third Reich is allowed to swallow Austria. Hitler demands to give him the Sudetes. The German generals are terrified! Logic suggests that Germany is not ready for war, even with Czechoslovakia. And behind it are powerful allies - France and England. The USSR offers its help to the Czechs. The German military even wants to overthrow the "demoniac".

However, a "miracle" occurs. Munich Agreement. Hitler is given to understand that Europe is his so that he will begin a "crusade" to the East.

Germany absorbs the Sudetenland, and then Czechoslovakia, completely psychologically crushed by the behavior of its Western "partners".

This is followed by the Polish campaign and the "strange war". The German generals are panicking again. While the German divisions in the east are fighting the Poles, the rear is practically defenseless. French and British divisions would have easily defeated the Third Reich if they had launched an offensive. But the allies do everything except war. They play football and drink wine while Poland is being wiped off the face of the earth. Hitler was allowed to crush Poland.

Then Hitler begins his game.

After Poland, he had to attack Russia. But he turned out to be smarter and tried to dodge, to become the "king of the mountain." Germany turns west, capturing Denmark, Norway, Belgium and Holland. Smashes France. The British flee to their islands.

True, this scenario suits the owners of England and the United States. France is "drained". The Third Reich receives military, economic, human and raw materials from almost all of Europe.

It was reasonable after the occupation of the Balkans to establish control over the entire Mediterranean (Malta, Gibraltar, Egypt, Palestine and Syria), North Africa. Force England to surrender. But the Fuhrer turns to the East, leaving Britain not finished off.

Apparently Hitler knew that there would be no second front.

Germany will be allowed to calmly resolve the "Russian question", that is, to destroy the Russian (Soviet) civilization and the Russian people. It was a civilization war, an all-out war of annihilation. Russians were viewed as "subhumans" who needed to be exterminated, some of them were deported even further east, to Asia. To deprive Russians of education, stories, culture, science and industry. Those who remained would be turned into slaves. Therefore, while England and the United States were confident that the Fuhrer would cope with the assigned task, they did not climb into Europe. They only got worried when the Russians began to beat the Teutons.

The secret of Hitler's "magic"


However, the secret of Hitler's victories is not only in the steel rear and the support of the "world community".

The fact is that the Fuhrer and his associates really built the country of the future. Only if the Soviet Union was a stranger from a wonderful future, where good and justice won, then the Reich - from the future world of inferno, the "black sun".

Hitler was allowed to use the organizational, psychic technologies of the future. What the Fuhrer got was ahead of his modern era by entire generations. Actually, the innovative breakthroughs in social engineering, organization, science and technology, which were made by the Third Reich and the USSR during the World War (partly by the USA), and created a new era in the history of mankind.

So, Hitler built Germany as a corporation country, as a corporate society and opposed it to an individualistic Western society. In such a society, the corporation country was simply super efficient. She walked through the western world like a knife through butter. The Third Reich easily beat its opponents in Europe, as it was ahead of them in organizing its society. Germany under the Fuhrer became unified. From workers, housewives, soldiers to generals and representatives of big business. Virtually no resistance to Nazism until the fall of the Reich. The Russians are already going to storm Berlin, and all the Germans, as obedient parts of a single mechanism, are doing their job. Generals command, soldiers fight, and workers produce Tanks and rifles.

The Hitler Corporation made it possible to identify and use the innovative finds of Guderian, Manstein, Goering, Goebbels and others. Show the most amazing combinations of forces and means. Squeeze out of people and weapons maximum possibilities. To achieve superiority in the collective psyche, to be able to reveal the creativity, enterprise and energy of their adherents. Find yourself on the verge of creating a "miracle weapon" - jet planes, ballistic missiles, space, "flying saucers" and nuclear weapons.

Return of corporations


It should be noted that already at the beginning of the XNUMXth century, corporations were already considered completely outdated. They were a symbol of social and professional associations of people in the Middle Ages. For example, such corporations were knightly and monastic orders, cities that consisted of corporations - guilds, workshops. Even beggars and criminals had their own corporations. Corporations had their own governing bodies, acting on behalf of all members, treasury, courts, churches, a system of mutual assistance and social support. Man was a part of such corporations. There was no competition within them, and the “man to man is a wolf” rule did not work. There they were all "one for all and all for one."

In the XNUMXth century, the West won out the belief in the unlimited development of liberalism, freedom and democracy. In the further liberation of the individual, her rights. Capitalism has mercilessly destroyed medieval corporations. He even stole the name "corporation" for his associations. The personality was autonomous and responsible only for itself, competing in the market with others. The remnants of the former corporate concepts remained only in the aristocratic peoples' monarchies - Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia.

Moreover, in Russia, these beginnings have been preserved most of all. It was a society of the traditional type, where "I" and "we" were not separated. Russian is a part of the people, the Motherland. If he separates from Russia, he quickly loses his "Russianness" and becomes an American, a German, an Australian, and so on.

It is not surprising that the first breakthrough of ideocratic corporations into a bourgeois-capitalist society that was completely unprepared for them took place in Russia. These were the Russian Bolsheviks with their idea of ​​social justice, the elimination of the exploitation of man by man. Thanks to a big idea, for which people were ready to die, iron will, discipline, organization and solidarity, the Russian communists managed to perform a miracle: defeat the superior forces of the West and the East, nationalists and White Guards who fought for bourgeois, liberal Russia. They were able to restore Russian statehood in the form of the USSR, give a second wind to Russian civilization and build a new power-empire. Under Stalin, the Communist Party will become a kind of order - an ideological order-corporation.

Others followed the Russians. In Italy, the fascist corporate regime of Mussolini was created, in Germany - the Nazi one. Hitler himself noted that he learned a lot from the Bolsheviks.

True, there was also a big difference. Russian communism proposed building a bright future for all people who would abandon social parasitism. That is, if you take the concept of the Star Wars saga, it was the bright side of power. Fascists and Nazis were building a "new brave world" only for the elite, but expanded its scope to cover almost the entire nation. It was created at the expense of people of the second or third class, "subhuman". Thus, it was also a kind of slave-owning world, with masters and slaves. It was dominated not by the thickest purses - the plutocrats, but by the ideological party functionaries, the higher bureaucracy, the military and scientific and technical elite. At the same time, the common people received their share through the exploitation of the conquered peoples, colonies, the development of someone else's living space.

In some respects, it was a revenge from the Middle Ages, but on a new level. The idea of ​​a corporation and corporatism are becoming the basis for the beginning of a new era in the history of mankind. Breaking into the capitalist, bourgeois, individualistic and sick Western society, corporations have spawned a collective mind and have managed to defeat the enemy with a series of "miracles". An unprecedented speed of decision-making, unpredictability, the combination of information, mental, organizational and technological methods of struggle.

It was the futurism of Hitler's Third Reich that allowed the Germans to win magnificent victories in 1940-1941, and then also fiercely fight until May 1945, although the country was not ready for total war.

As a result, it was not classical capitalism (“democracy”) that could end the German inferno world, an alien from the “dark ages”, but another guest from the future - a Soviet corporation.

If Hitler had not been stopped by the Soviet Union, then he had every chance to subjugate England, occupy the Middle East and establish direct contact with Japan. The United States locked itself in the Western Hemisphere.
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    17 June 2021 04: 22
    Russians were seen as "subhumans" to be exterminated
    And the Soviet person did not like this very much and Hitler and his Nazism were destroyed. Hitler kaput!
    1. +8
      17 June 2021 04: 30
      The article is not about THIS at all, but about state corporatism, in the context of neo-traditionalism.
      However, I am not opposed. There is no reason or desire.
      1. +4
        17 June 2021 16: 05
        The First World War did not solve the main task - the destruction of Russian civilization
        I correctly understood that the 1st World War was unleashed in order to pull Russia into it and then destroy it in the process of hostilities ?.
        1. +2
          19 June 2021 09: 40
          The secret of Hitler's success is that he was supported by almost all of Europe! And the US also worked for the might of Hitler's army.
    2. 0
      17 June 2021 06: 34
      Hitler without the support of the Anglo-Saxons, no one can call him! The Anglo-Saxons are the largest imperialist empire (for the sake of appearance, divided by borders, halos of habitation)! And Marxism-Leninism was the first of the social doctrines to reveal the class essence of politics [Anglo-Saxons] and war, showing that the foundations of all politics and any war are laid in the very mode of production, in the system of socio-political relations, in the social and state structure of a given country. Grandfather Lenin repeatedly stressed that "every war is inseparably linked to the political system from which it flows." War, for the Anglo-Saxon tycoons, is a catalyst for an avalanche-like enrichment! And to find something abnormal for the embodiment of your cannibalistic desires in any pub, not only in Bavaria, is a matter of technology! In St. Petersburg, go to a classic wine-glass room - in each corner, at least one Spinoza and three Stolypin, who clearly know how we can arrange Russia - but we have good people! Because from God! And in the wine-glasses of the West, completely victims of the Reformation - the elect, the true Aryans, go to heaven, and you need to bear the burden of the white man to all Slavic barbarians (otherwise they have a lot of hydrocarbons) ... laughing
      1. -6
        17 June 2021 07: 48
        Quote: Finches
        And in the wine-glasses of the West, completely victims of the Reformation - the elect, the true Aryans, go to heaven.

        And in the Kremlin glass-room they said: calm down, servants - we we'll go to heaven, and they just die. True, they did not specify what was under we mean members of their club.
        1. -6
          17 June 2021 08: 16
          Putin said everything correctly and there is no need to distort his words here giving them a completely different meaning!
          1. -8
            17 June 2021 08: 21
            Quote: Finches
            Putin said everything correctly and there is no need to distort his words here giving them a completely different meaning!

            Well, you know better from the "classic St. Petersburg wine room", I admit it. laughing
            1. +5
              17 June 2021 08: 31
              You can’t argue, because, as the presumptuous Anglo-Saxon taught, Danila Bogrov- "there is no Truth behind you!" laughing
              1. -6
                17 June 2021 08: 47
                Quote: Finches
                because, as the presumptuous Anglo-Saxon taught, Danila Bogrov

                It seems he was Bаgrove. But not the point. This gopnik is your idol, I suppose?
                1. -1
                  17 June 2021 17: 49
                  And who is your idol, well, or not an idol, but a person really worthy of respect?
                  1. +3
                    17 June 2021 18: 14
                    Quote: Andrey VOV
                    And who is your idol, well, or not an idol, but a person really worthy of respect?

                    Movie heroes?
                    Sanya Maleshkin)
                    1. +1
                      18 June 2021 07: 24
                      Here I am with you on the same wavelength!
          2. +9
            17 June 2021 09: 29
            Quote: Finches
            and there is no need to distort here

            What to distort! As he said, we understood. The words of a person who doesn't care about everyone, including you
            1. 0
              17 June 2021 23: 27
              Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
              did not specify what we mean by members of our club.

              To understand this, Putin must be considered a god))
      2. 0
        18 June 2021 16: 43
        Quote: Finches
        Grandfather Lenin repeatedly stressed that "every war is inseparably linked to the political system from which it flows."

        The trouble is that the USSR fought a bunch of wars - but at the same time there was not a single Anglo-Saxon in the political system ...
        Contradiction, however ...
    3. -14
      17 June 2021 06: 51
      the policy in Germany of those years cannot be considered in isolation from the policy in the USSR, but only TOGETHER, because the great war was between these peoples.
      1. +7
        17 June 2021 07: 33
        Quote: Bar1
        the policy in Germany of those years cannot be considered in isolation from the policy in the USSR, but only TOGETHER, because the great war was between these peoples.

        Be careful. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse.
        On June 9, the State Duma adopted in the third, final reading a law banning publicly identifying the goals and actions of the USSR and Nazi Germany in World War II, and also denying the decisive role of the Soviet people in the victory over fascism.
        1. 0
          17 June 2021 08: 12
          )))
          I am compelled to report that you, dear man, have lied.
          1. Project 1166218-7 will become law after signing by the Sovereign. There is little doubt about this, but it does not hurt to clarify.
          2. Project 1166218-7 does not contain the word "fascism" at all. And it would be strange to talk about the victory of the Soviet people over fascism - according to the statements of many deputies of the State Duma, the fascists feel quite well and run their brown ball in at least four countries that were previously part of this very Soviet people. I'm not talking about the notorious liberal fascism. Which is not only the dominant ideology of the damned West, but also seized footholds in the God-saved Fatherland. For example, in the financial sector.

          The wording of the bill
          denial of the decisive role of the Soviet people in the defeat of Nazi Germany and the humanitarian mission of the USSR during the liberation of European countries

          I cannot fail to note that old people like me instantly felt a liberal scent - the praise of the "feat of the Soviet people" was planted at one time by liberals who wanted to push and lose somewhere the decisive role of the Party and personally Comrade Stalin in the Great Victory. So some of the authors of the law are a great patriot out loud, but in their hearts - Kolya from Urengoy. All issues of the magazine "Ogonyok" for 1988-1992 are kept on the mezzanine.

          Where are the searches?
          1. 0
            17 June 2021 08: 19
            Quote: Cherry Nine
            1. Project 1166218-7 will become law after signing by the Emperor

            Read the Russian Constitution:
            Article 105.
            1. Federal legislation adopted by the State Duma.

            The President issues Decrees.
            1. +1
              17 June 2021 08: 45
              I have to admit that you are formally right. The State Duma is considering the bill, but after voting in the State Duma, the document is already called a law and comes to the Federation Council and for the Tsar's signature in this capacity - as a law that has not entered into force.

              So I made a mistake with the first claim, I admit.
              1. 0
                17 June 2021 08: 48
                Quote: Cherry Nine
                as a law that has not entered into force.

                If we are to be consistent to the end, the Law comes into force only after its publication in the media. The role of the participants in this process:

                1. +1
                  17 June 2021 08: 54
                  When it comes into force another matter, it was not discussed. The mistake was when the bill gets the status of the law, after the State Duma or after the preza. After the GD.
                  1. 0
                    17 June 2021 09: 02
                    Quote: Cherry Nine
                    when a bill acquires the status of a law, after the DG or after ...

                    The bill becomes law after passing three readings in the Duma.

                    The duty of the president, as the guarantor of the Constitution, is to ensure that the adopted law does not violate the provisions of the current Constitution. His signature under the Law ensures that this law does not violate the Basic Law.
            2. BAI
              0
              17 June 2021 18: 09
              Read the Russian Constitution:
              Article 105.
              1. Federal laws are adopted by the State Duma.

              We look at the website of the State Duma: the passage of bill No. 1166218-7:
              10.06.2021/XNUMX/XNUMX sent to the Federation Council.
              10.06.2021
              sent to committees (commissions); appointed responsible (Committee of the Federation Council on Defense and Security); appointed co-executors (Federation Council Committee on Constitutional Legislation and State Building; Federation Council Committee on International Affairs)

              Until today, inclusively, the bill (not the LAW!) Is without movement.
              1. +1
                17 June 2021 18: 38
                There is a nuance in the name of the document that comes from the State Duma to the Federation Council and for signature. A bill or already a law. It turns out that it is correct to call it a "law" (but not in force).
                1. BAI
                  0
                  17 June 2021 20: 49
                  on the website of the State Duma is called a "bill".
        2. +1
          17 June 2021 20: 45
          Quote: Boris55
          On June 9, the State Duma adopted in the third, final reading a law banning publicly identifying the goals and actions of the USSR and Nazi Germany in World War II, and also denying the decisive role of the Soviet people in the victory over fascism.


          this bourgeois State Duma, which makes people work more and more, and the standard of living of the people is getting lower and lower, I DISPASSE, especially Tereshkova and her protege.
          History can be neither class nor legal, but only real / truthful / impartial and deceitful / dishonest.
          So I will always be on the side of integrity, and not with this deceitful capitalist parliament.
          In fact: that Germany, that the USSR was being prepared for a big slaughter and huge funds were poured into both countries, first of all, to destroy the main, most powerful and viable part of the gene pool of peoples, regardless of who wins.
          If we see that Germany is winning, then we should help Russia, and if Russia is winning, then we should help Germany, and thus let them kill as much as possible!

          This is the very essence of Western policy, without embellishment, to destroy the population of Russia and Germany. And for this, the West helped Russia to industrialize and Germany, which was doing the same.
          And if our oligarchic thought does not understand this, then I do not give a damn and I will not take my words back.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +1
        17 June 2021 08: 19
        Quote: Bar1
        the policy in Germany of those years cannot be considered in isolation from the policy in the USSR, but only TOGETHER, because the great war was between these peoples.

        Solzhenicism of the brain is a serious and almost incurable disease (only punitive psychiatry can help a little) laughing
        1. 0
          17 June 2021 08: 33
          Quote: Finches
          Solzhenicism of the brain is a serious and almost incurable disease (only punitive psychiatry can help a little)

          Does Samsonov's vulgar nationalism in the lace of stupid speculations appeal to you more? I think yes, because the collective "Samsonov" is a singer of autarky, which, in turn, is an ideal for you and those like you.
          1. +1
            17 June 2021 08: 55
            Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
            "Samsonov" - the singer of autarky

            There is a strange mixture of autarchy and empire. The USSR in general, and Stalin's in particular, has never been autarky.
            1. -1
              17 June 2021 09: 05
              Quote: Cherry Nine
              The USSR in general, and Stalin's in particular, has never been autarky.

              I am referring to Haushofer's connotation, not the traditional understanding of autarky.
          2. -10
            17 June 2021 13: 26
            Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
            I think yes, because the collective "Samsonov" is a singer of autarky, which, in turn, is an ideal for you and those like you.

            You think correctly, because the majority of the Russian population, according to support in the presidential elections, does not perceive the vulgar Western democracy based on perverted ideas about good and evil.
            So you are flying, dear, like plywood over Paris - our people will not tolerate homosexuals in power and therefore citizens choose traditional values ​​for us. Are you personally against them?
        2. -3
          17 June 2021 08: 45
          In some ways Bar1 is right - in both states there was a consolidation of society on the eve of the coming conflict. Only the goals were different - some created an instrument of aggression, others wanted a chance to resist. I did not like the ambiguity in Bar1's presentation.
          1. -1
            17 June 2021 18: 15
            Quote: dzvero
            Bar1 is right about something

            In their own way, everyone is right. But in my opinion - no. (from)
            Knyshev.
  2. 0
    17 June 2021 04: 28
    In general and in general I agree with the tabs, messages and conclusions. Some rough edges in terminology are not important enough to be discussed.
  3. +1
    17 June 2021 04: 31
    - And where is the king?
    - It is necessary to have a snack!
  4. +3
    17 June 2021 04: 50
    The first reason for Hitler's success is the support of the so-called "world behind the scenes", the financial international, the masters of France, England and the United States.

    The second is witchcraft and selling the soul to the Devil what
    1. +6
      17 June 2021 04: 57
      World backstage or w ..- the Masonic conspiracy, do you not know laughing
      1. -2
        17 June 2021 08: 59
        Chabad Lubavitch, together with the Woody Allen-Rockefeller clan, took possession of the world press to support their ram against the Superborean Civilization of Hyper-ethnos of Tartary Yes
        1. +8
          17 June 2021 12: 08
          Quote: Krasnodar
          to support his ram against the Superborean Civilization Hyper-Ethnos of Tartary

          An uninvited Mason is worse than tartarin. Ishsho Bismarck warned - 'akhtung, goy thou, Puperethnos, and do not fight against the Superethnos, raised under the Budennovsk helmets, but fed by the program of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks ...'
          1. +5
            17 June 2021 12: 59
            Along the bottom of the Kolchak fronts, messed up, or forgot, sho Shelom Budyono-Bronsteinovsky with Barmitsa Stakhanovskaya is stronger than any steel of the Masters of the West of Rhine-Westphalia forged negative
  5. +12
    17 June 2021 05: 57
    The First World War did not solve the main task - the destruction of Russian civilization.
    those. G. Principle, pursued this goal when Archduke Ferdinand, in Sarajevo, filled up? They fooled, French women, the tsar - father, when they concluded a military alliance against Germany, and in order not to escape, England was connected to the alliance. He then naive, trusting thought that this alliance was for the sake of redistributing the world, but it turned out to be for the sake of destroying Russian civilization. however, work. The world decided to bleed itself, if only to destroy the Russian civilization. laughing
    1. 0
      17 June 2021 07: 15
      Quote: parusnik
      The First World War did not solve the main task - the destruction of Russian civilization.
      those. G. Principle, pursued this goal when Archduke Ferdinand, in Sarajevo, filled up? They fooled, French women, the tsar - father, when they concluded a military alliance against Germany, and in order not to escape, England was connected to the alliance. He then naive, trusting thought that this alliance was for the sake of redistributing the world, but it turned out to be for the sake of destroying Russian civilization. however, work. The world decided to bleed itself, if only to destroy the Russian civilization. laughing

      And the pearl about the new just social system of the 20-30s in the USSR suited you?) All that beautiful in the Union, which the author writes about, appeared much later ... under Stalin in the 30s, the system looked more like an absolute monarchy than socialism ... the benefits of socialism have not yet been delivered, and everything around belonged to the state with the father of nations at its head, which has practically unlimited and absolute power ...
      1. -4
        17 June 2021 07: 48
        Quote: parma
        under Stalin in the 30s, the system was more like an absolute monarchy than socialism ... the benefits of socialism had not yet been delivered, and everything around belonged to the state with the father of nations at its head

        On VO there was an article "Entrepreneurs of Stalin"
        https://topwar.ru/82220-predprinimateli-stalina.html

        You may have missed it. Khrushchev and his followers grabbed everything and drove the "tsehoviks" underground. If this had not happened, then jeans and chewing gum would have had their own ...

        The First World War was suspended because power in Russia was seized by the Trotskyists. The genocide of the Russian people was in full swing. After the takeover of control in 1924 by the Bolshevik Stalin, the civil war was ended and mass repressions stopped.

        The renewal of the war of the united forces of capitalism, against the first state of workers and peasants in the world, was inevitable.

        The First and Second World Wars are two stages of the same action, the purpose of which was to turn Russia (USSR) into a kind of Africa - many small principalities constantly at war with each other. They have not abandoned this goal to this day.
        1. +3
          17 June 2021 08: 54
          Quote: Boris55
          Quote: parma
          under Stalin in the 30s, the system was more like an absolute monarchy than socialism ... the benefits of socialism had not yet been delivered, and everything around belonged to the state with the father of nations at its head

          On VO there was an article "Entrepreneurs of Stalin"
          https://topwar.ru/82220-predprinimateli-stalina.html

          You may have missed it. Khrushchev and his followers grabbed everything and drove the "tsehoviks" underground. If this had not happened, then jeans and chewing gum would have had their own ...

          The First World War was suspended because power in Russia was seized by the Trotskyists. The genocide of the Russian people was in full swing. After the takeover of control in 1924 by the Bolshevik Stalin, the civil war was ended and mass repressions stopped.

          The renewal of the war of the united forces of capitalism, against the first state of workers and peasants in the world, was inevitable.

          The First and Second World Wars are two stages of the same action, the purpose of which was to turn Russia (USSR) into a kind of Africa - many small principalities constantly at war with each other. They have not abandoned this goal to this day.

          You are a little confused)) in that article of a huge lover of the conspiracy against the Slavic-Aryans, it is not said about small business, but about state enterprises)) but the fact that they bought equipment and raw materials, so did the Ministry of Defense during the Great Patriotic War bought tanks and planes at state military-industrial complex plants! It's just that any money is a common unit of measurement, so it's more convenient than measuring in pieces (especially when you consider that factories are equipped according to different qualifications and have specialists of different qualifications, somewhere, for example, less electricity is required. Energy and man-hours are less, somewhere more for the production of the same tank) ... and closed the artels not because they decided to take away the business, but because small enterprises follow fashion and demand well, but cannot ensure such high efficiency (low cost and simply huge circulations) of production ...
          Regarding the First World War, check out again how it began and how it ended) Trotsky did not sign the White Peace with Germany)) and even after the Republic of Ingushetia left the war, the DB did not end for the participants, it was just that the Republic of Ingushetia lost the war))
          And the Civil War ended in fact by 1920 ... the dissenters were finally finished off by 1922 ...
          The Second World War began before the Great Patriotic War (which is generally accepted in 1939, that according to Putin in 1938), and the latter was part of it, so there was no world conspiracy against the USSR, moreover, life in the country of workers and peasants, as I wrote already higher, it was poorer and heavier than in the countries of decaying capitalism, maybe there were no free apartments, vouchers, etc., etc., and the average salary was somehow enough for bread, milk and potatoes every day (hence the permission for local farms, so that the ruling "The class did not die of hunger) .. but it could not be otherwise - almost all the resources of the state were spent on the fact that the sharks of world capitalism (who allegedly rebuilt Hitler's war machine against the USSR) build factories and supply technology for our country (a huge amateur the Nazis, Ford helped us with this) .. I want to paraphrase the words from my favorite childhood cartoon “they are building a tank factory for us, but why? Ah, they will attack us! "...
          Both world wars were really part of a common process - Germany's attempts to become the hegemon of Europe, but both times they were shown to their place ...
  6. +12
    17 June 2021 06: 00
    Again communism is compared with fascism and Nazism. An ideology that proclaims the brotherhood of peoples and sees the desired future as an era of peace and fraternal cooperation differs from an ideology that sees the future as the dominance of the "higher" over the "lower". Communism and Nazism are different things. Contempt for "subhumans", belief in one's racial exclusivity and the dream of the brotherhood of peoples - these are two big and incomparable differences.
    1. -2
      17 June 2021 08: 19
      Quote: SERGE ant
      Ideology that proclaims the brotherhood of peoples and sees the desired future as an era of peace and fraternal cooperation

      This is an ersatz religion. Any idealistic nonsense can be declared. Yes, and in missionary methods they were not particularly shy - Comrade Lenin and Co. tried Europe with a bayonet, the experience turned out to be a failure. The chimera of the pan-European revolution shrank very quickly to a "single" one. What, in fact, did they do.
      1. +9
        17 June 2021 08: 41
        Comrade Lenin and Co. tried Europe with a bayonet, the experience turned out to be a failure. The chimera of the pan-European revolution very quickly shrank to "in a single"
        ― You have an amazing memory!
        ―Now not about this. Now about the fact that this (communism and Nazism) is not "twin brothers". That's what I mean.
        1. -3
          17 June 2021 12: 10
          Quote: SERGE ant
          that this (communism and Nazism) is not "twin brothers". That's what I mean.

          Not. But relatives))
          1. +5
            17 June 2021 14: 45
            Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
            Quote: SERGE ant
            that this (communism and Nazism) is not "twin brothers". That's what I mean.

            Not. But relatives))


            Well, of course, if May 1 and both have a holiday, then the ideologies are similar and horror, the word "socialism is present (alien logic).
            For me, they are absolute antagonists (worse than Arabs and Jews, although they are clearly relatives). But what is interesting is Western liberalism, then it was the Nazis who kissed passionately. (ignoring the German democrats and moderate nationalists, I generally keep quiet about the communists).
            Fact. Why is it so.?
            The author is wrong when he said that Hitler was a purely anti-Russian project aimed only at destroying the USSR.
            Lords on the Thames. will not allow (they so wished) the absolute strengthening of any other state. Everyone should be at enmity and suspicion of each other (or better, they fought). And so on ad infinitum.
            And who to be an ally or an adversary of this or that, they would decide (according to the situation, taking into account the imperial interests).
            Did I say something new?
          2. -1
            17 June 2021 15: 56
            Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
            No.

            Oh, what a power!
            Ah, what people were in her!
            How solemnly majestic
            The sounds of the anthem swam over the world!
            Ah, how the faces were revealed,
            How glances are filled with light!
            How beautiful was the capital!
            How magnificent the parades are!
            Passing a triumphal march,
            Impeccably beautiful formation,
            The youth swore allegiance to the elders
            Battle-hardened heroes -
            Do not be lazy and scumbags
            Caught in our idols ...
            For living in people - an idea!
            Thirst to be at the forefront of the world!
            What was so evil
            In what we understood firmly,
            That "comrade" is not just a word,
            And does this word sound proudly?
            In that they were one people,
            Firmly welded together by common faith
            What virtues are not income,
            And another measured by a measure?
            In that vulgarity on demand
            Not drowned in mud art?
            What attracted the boys to the sky?
            What did the girls have feelings?
            Ah, how much everything is now subtle
            Worse, lower and even rarer:
            Let the melody of the hymn be the same
            But an impulse and an idea - where?
            And just unbearable grief
            The impossibility of reconciliation
            Not with the loss of territories,
            But with the loss of generations!
            No matter how puffed up these faces,
            Is there any place with them hope?
            Ah how all this is unlike
            To the country that we knew before!
            What was young, winged,
            Forces multiplied year after year,
            Where people respected the soldier
            And the soldier was proud of the people.
            The one where they were given light
            To where the open spaces were clear ...
            And what kind of movie was filmed
            Our best directors!
            And what songs rang!
            How shoulders straightened from them!
            As we walked under them together
            Early in the morning to dawn!
            These songs are about the main thing in life:
            About freedom, dream, flight,
            About love for the dear homeland,
            About work that is always held in high esteem,
            And the girls that flowers
            Blossom under the May sun
            And about mom waiting for us at home,
            And about a familiar land since childhood,
            And about honor and courage
            And about a faithful, reliable friend ...
            And aleli above us flags
            ...
            1. -3
              17 June 2021 16: 14
              Quote: Cherry Nine
              And aleli above us flags
              ...

              )))
              Vorsicht, Philip Philipovich (c)
              1. -1
                17 June 2021 16: 26
                I continued to recite. Somewhere at the end a Finnish knife was shining menacingly ... "Tra-ta-tita-there in a tavern fight, tra-ta-there a Finnish knife under my heart ..." I managed to slow down a centimeter from this ominously gleaming blade.
            2. +4
              17 June 2021 17: 42
              Quote: Cherry Nine
              Oh, what a power!


              Blossom under the May sun
              And about mom waiting for us at home,
              And about a familiar land since childhood,
              And about honor and courage
              And about a faithful, reliable friend ...
              And aleli above us flags
              With a black swastika in a white circle.

              So what?
              The torpedo passed by.
              1. 0
                17 June 2021 18: 40
                Quote: chenia
                So what?

                It is necessary to add some nasty stuff here))). Do not promote here.
                1. +3
                  17 June 2021 18: 55
                  Quote: Cherry Nine
                  Do not promote here.


                  But it should be noted that you did not set the trap badly.
                  And you often succeed. Thin.
                  And teach your like-minded Paragraph such techniques. And the feeling that this is an alien from a planet with two-dimensional space. Everything is flat and monosyllabic.

                  Well, Hitler wanted to build communism in a separate country, at the expense of others. Destruction on this path is everything and everyone.
                  This is the main difference from us. We have happiness in every home and in the whole world., To all peoples and nations (sometimes even to those who didn't really want it) ..
        2. +4
          17 June 2021 20: 05
          Socialism and Nazism are NOT AT ALL twin brothers, but between Socialism and Fascism of the Italian-Spanish type, there are some similarities. For example social programs. For example, free education (for those who have passed the entrance exams). Italy was the SECOND country in Europe to give women maternity leave (the USSR was the first). Yes, a lot of things. Benitto Mussolini was himself a socialist and VERY many of his ideas grew out of socialist ideas (which Mussolini himself did not hide). Unification around the state. Unification around ONE ideology. Patriotism reaching the level of jingoism (which is nothing wrong). When we talk about Communism, or even socialism, we have to ask ourselves "WHAT" socialism are we talking about? Trotsky's socialism (Do not be remembered for the night)? Stalin's socialism? Socialism of Marx (a pure theoretician who does not go beyond his office, an amateur and creator of many spherical horses in vacuum, later proved by the untenable PRACTICE and experience of Lenin and Stalin and Mao)? Maoism? Or a bunch of local variants of Socialism? For example, what was built in Libya by poor Gaddafi, whom the Libyans so "thanked"? Naturally, we received what they deserved in return from karma. Let's define what we are comparing with what? If we compare Trotskyism with the same ideas of Mussolini, then Trotskyism loses miserably. For example, Italian fascism (and Spanish) denied the identity of nationalities. "You are not Basques or Castilians there - you are all SPANISH." Franco spoke. In the same way in China they say "You are not Han, Tibetans or all sorts of Uighurs there - you are Chinese." But in the USSR they decided to focus not on "You are Soviet people" but on "originality" (often artificially created - see Ukraine), peoples and cultures. What kind of culture if many peoples living in the Russian Empire did not even have their own written language? The lesson of the "Triune" empire, which shattered to smithereens at the slightest shock, did not teach the Soviet elite after Stalin ANYTHING.
          I am not praising Mussolini (although, compared to what is happening now in the USA and Europe, Mussolini would have been clearly preferable, with him BLM, ANTIFA, LGBT, off-scale crime and looting, hordes of welders and illegal immigrants would not have existed). I'm just saying that Italian Fascism is one thing. German Nazism is different, Pinochet's Fascism (which allowed foreign capital into the country, which Mussolini did NOT do, this is the third, by the way, this foreign capital destroyed the economy in Chile). The ideas of Marx are one thing (pure theory), the ideas of Lenin are the Other, the ideas of Trotsky are the Third, the ideas of Stalin are the fourth, Maoism is the fifth, and then on the list. If we COMPARE, then we need to decide what is being compared with what.
          Trotsky's internationalism is absolutely not Stalin's internationalism, and it is absolutely not Mao's jingoism (although there is nothing wrong with Jingoism - a native country would live and there would be no other worries, I personally START as in other countries, I do not wish them anything bad, but I want it to be good above all where I live, you will feed the hungry children of your neighbor only when YOUR children are full and there is an excess of food).

          By the way, American BLM, ANTIFA, LGBT "community", the nation of Islam, Black Panthers and anarchists paid for by Soros, Rothschild and other "transnational" banks quite sincerely consider themselves communists. Moreover, LGBThernoten-schizophrenics and psychos who support them go to demonstrations with SOVIET flags. Compare Stalin's ideas with theirs and practices? If we COMPARE, we need to decide what we are comparing with what, and for what.

          For Indians, "freedom, democracy and capitalism" turned out to be genocide, for Ukrainians and others, socialism turned out to be salvation and the opportunity to invent their own "original" culture and come up with their own "original" history, for example, it was for the Ukrainians. German Nazism is the genocide of many nations, Italian and Spanish fascism sneezed at the shape of the nose, work, pay taxes and obey the laws. Khrushchev yelled about the need for "National cadres in the republics" (to which we know what this led to), Mao shrugged his mighty shoulders (Yan Tzi was not for weaklings to swim there and back without rest), answered "It doesn't matter what color the cat is, if only he could catch mice well . ". Mao, being a cat himself, knew what he was talking about. (Mao is a cat).
  7. -3
    17 June 2021 06: 48
    The First World War did not solve the main task - the destruction of Russian civilization
    more precisely, it was one of the tasks, but it was:
    “Here we will create breeding nurseriesnecessary for further fighting in the east. And they will certainly appear here "
    - and this was written not in 1941, but in 1915 about the plan in Ober Ost Ludendorff.

    Then it did not work out and went for the same in 1941.
    Creation of a society of knowledge, service and creation. Full disclosure of the spiritual, intellectual and physical potential of the person-creator. It was a terrible threat to the Western world, its masters. The Soviet world was attractive, beautiful, attracted the best people of mankind.

    a world in which hunger is not attractive with deaths from him happened a year later, or even more often: the whole GW, 1921,22,23,24,25,28,30,32,33,34,36,37,46,47yy, lack of freedom in everything, camps, multimillion extrajudicial exile and executions, collectives and incessant false chatter.
    World War II - the blow of the USA and England to Russia and Germany

    and how did the United States and England hit Germany? Loans? Did Germany not want to hit anyone herself?
    They were able to restore the Russian statehood in the form of the USSR,

    Russian statehood in the form of ... the Ukrainian SSR? KSSR? Ukrainianization of the Russian population, Russian cities and regions? Demolition of Russian monuments there?
    Under Stalin, the communist the party will become a kind of order - an ideological order-corporation.

    .

    Zaboristaya, yes ... belay
  8. +1
    17 June 2021 06: 57
    Why is this another enchanting slurry in the History section, and not in Opinions?
    1. +3
      17 June 2021 14: 52
      IGOR GORDEEV (Igor)
      Today, 14: 36
      Quote: Daniil Konovalenko
      Oh my God! The Samsonov corporation just splashes with ideas smile
      It is foolish to deny that the article contains no ideas, reflections that do not make you think.

      Something like that. laughing "We showed you the drama Pif - bang, hunter and hare, who is right and who is wrong. Think, think" (c)
  9. +2
    17 June 2021 08: 19
    The first reason for Hitler's success is the support of the so-called "world behind the scenes"

    Reptilians and Anunnaki are not mentioned!
  10. -3
    17 June 2021 08: 50
    Another delirium from Samsonov. The topic is revealed, the Anglo-Zionists and corporations are to blame. We are waiting for the Tatra, then the curtain and disperse.
    1. 0
      19 August 2021 19: 35
      Interestingly, he writes - the Russian (Soviet) people. Soviet - always in parentheses. Few things, no matter what they think, here!
  11. Naz
    0
    17 June 2021 09: 07
    "
    If Hitler had not been stopped by the Soviet Union, then he had every chance to subjugate England, occupy the Middle East and establish direct contact with Japan. The US was locked in the Western Hemisphere. "
    If it were for the mares, then mushrooms would grow in the mouth.
  12. +2
    17 June 2021 09: 10
    Oh my God! Samsonov corporation, just splashes with ideas smile
    1. -5
      17 June 2021 14: 36
      Quote: Daniil Konovalenko
      Oh my God! Samsonov corporation, just splashes with ideas smile

      It is foolish to deny that the article contains no ideas, reflections that do not make you think.
      1. +6
        17 June 2021 14: 54
        It is foolish to deny that the article contains no ideas, reflections that do not make you think.
        For example?
        The First World War did not solve the main task - the destruction of Russian civilization.
        ?
      2. +1
        17 June 2021 15: 15
        Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
        It is foolish to deny that the article contains no ideas, reflections

        no one denies. There are really no ideas and reflections in it.
  13. 0
    17 June 2021 09: 21
    Hitler and German Nazis were financed by Anglo-American capital. Thus, a hotbed of a great war in Europe was created, aimed at the East.
    Having unleashed the Second World War, American capital was fabulously enriched, which cannot be said about the British, and Europe, like in WWI, was simply "lowered".
  14. 0
    17 June 2021 10: 29
    Yes, NSDAP is a global plutocracy project to destroy the remnants of European civilization. Open secret. The project, including the anti-German one, one of the goals of which, for example, was obviously the dismantling of the German state created by Prussia.
    the futuristic nature of Hitler's Third Reich allowed the Germans to win magnificent victories in 1940-1941, and then also fight fiercely until May 1945, although the country was not ready for total war

    But this is an important point that really gets little attention. It's not about the futuristic design, of course, it's about the formation of an image in the mass consciousness. However, Germany in 1939-1945 really lasted a long time. And the reason is that, just as before the war, the Germans were allowed to win bloodless victories, so during the war, the Anglo-Saxons deliberately allowed the Germans to first capture half of Europe, and then flounder in the trap for a long time until the resources were completely depleted, so that their prolonged resistance would lead to a total destruction of the economy and the destruction of the gene pool of central and eastern Europe (including the USSR)
  15. +4
    17 June 2021 11: 55
    World War I didn't decide main task - destruction of Russian civilization

    Oh everyone, oh I can’t ..
    Oil painting - here is Europe after the signing of the peace, mobilized millions of armies stick out in Europe, the military economy of the "Entente" is untwisted, transport and naval capabilities are mobilized to the utmost, the main enemy lost, the Republic of Ingushetia collapsed to form the Polish state and the Finnish state, there is a powerful nationalist backlog in Ukraine. In the east of Russia, anti-Bolshevik, but at the same time dependent in terms of providing themselves with resources, "white centers" are emerging, which regard the Entente countries as allies. The question is - if the MAIN TASK was "the destruction of Russian civilization" - why all this was not stupidly thrown in the spring of 1919 on a broad front? The White movement was still huge, but at the same time it had already disintegrated enough into rumors and intrigues, and already looked closely at the West in the mouth. The masses are tired of the war and have already begun to tire of the methods of the Reds. But no, none of this happens. What we usually call "intervention" is a pitiful little compared to the potential capabilities of the former "Entente" and the degree of chaos on the ruins of Ingushetia.
    From this I conclude that there was no goal of "destroying Russian civilization" in principle, and even more so as the main goal.
    1. -3
      17 June 2021 14: 33
      Quote: Knell Wardenheart
      From this I conclude that there was no goal of "destroying Russian civilization" in principle, and even more so as the main goal.

      Most likely, the goal was to bring the Russian statehood down to a consistently low level, and take the Eksel-Moxel and rise from ruin.
      1. +2
        17 June 2021 14: 54
        Everything has been going towards this for half a century, in a completely natural way along the tracks along which most of the monarchies of the world went. The rise then also happened according to completely natural laws - after the fall of the autocracy, patriotic-nationalist uprisings were often observed. The Russian autocracy sought to bring down its own forces, which it regularly preserved or restrained for years.
        We tend to historically overestimate the "long arm of the West" and greatly underestimate the power of disintegration processes within our society, which is often shackled by stupid rules and ineffective laws.
        The fact that social movements in their protest and discontent often rely on the west is also quite logical, historically ANY of our modernization since the time of Alexei Mikhailovich came from the west, from there they brought in books, artisans, fashion, products - and it is not surprising that ideas also penetrated from there because Western society, whether we like it or not, is ahead of us in terms of socio-economic relations.
  16. 0
    17 June 2021 14: 27

    It was reasonable after the occupation of the Balkans to establish control over the entire Mediterranean (Malta, Gibraltar, Egypt, Palestine and Syria), North Africa. Force England to surrender. But the Fuhrer turns to the East, leaving Britain not finished off.

    I also came to this conclusion.
    1. +1
      17 June 2021 15: 23
      The Fuhrer was a product of the environment - many NSDAP members hated leftists since the time of the German revolution and their unsuccessful actions within it. Many NSDAP members led or participated in freikors at that time and their perception of the left was fully formed in its negativization as a potential, creeping and insidious enemy.
      Accordingly, this perception penetrated the general line of the party and was supported by its petty-bourgeois element. Hitler, as a reflector of the interests of the NSDAP, also did not trust the Bolsheviks from the word at all, he saw the duality of their foreign policy and the duplicity of propaganda, well aware of the growing militarization of the USSR, since German specialists were often its participants. All this caused the German elite after 1936 to have a clear feeling that the USSR could at one moment return to the implementation of the idea of ​​a world (and European) revolution, would do it quite suddenly. The war in Spain indirectly confirmed these suspicions. The fascists simply could not but attack the USSR - for them this direction was "unreliable". They also understood that having got rid of the western threat to its borders for a while, the USSR would not hesitate to use this time for its strengthening and restructuring of the architecture of the current borders with the aim of greater convenience and benefits, both for defense and offensive.
      The USSR also indicated this intention both at the "negotiations" on joining the OSI, and in the secret part on the division of spheres of influence to Molotov-Ribbentrop, and by the Soviet-Finnish war. From the point of view of the Nazis' perception of the Bolsheviks, everything was extremely logical, neither Hitler nor his associates harbored illusions about the long-term non-intervention of the USSR in the European war.
      The seizure of fortified islands and serious actions in northern Africa were very tightly tied to the fleet and experienced naval commanders - neither one nor the other the Germans could create "on their knees", improvisation did not give a result close to 100% - the Cretan operation showed that the loss of even elite forces can be unreasonably high.
      Hitler could not invest in full in the Mediterranean because he feared and did not trust the USSR (which built the ground forces as a matter of priority) and still harbored illusions about Britain's "forcing peace".
  17. 0
    17 June 2021 14: 53
    It was reasonable after the occupation of the Balkans to establish control over the entire Mediterranean (Malta, Gibraltar, Egypt, Palestine and Syria), North Africa. Force England to surrender.

    To force England to surrender, the United States must be defeated. smile
    Because in 1941 the FDR will turn out with fur inside, but will not allow the surrender of Runway No. 1. Moreover, the "quarters' commission" is already traveling around the Islands, which determines the location of the US Army in Britain.
    1. 0
      17 June 2021 15: 52
      Quote: Alexey RA
      The "lodging commission" is already on the way to the islands,

      Not by the request of the petitioners the tongue froze,
      not beggars, squinting at the master's light, -
      we rode around, inspecting with masterful eyes
      the coming
      World Federation of Soviets
  18. -1
    17 June 2021 19: 09
    If Hitler had not been stopped by the Soviet Union, then he had every chance to subjugate England, occupy the Middle East and establish direct contact with Japan. The United States locked itself in the Western Hemisphere.


    Why not.

    The British themselves did not suffer poorly. They deceived themselves.
  19. 0
    17 June 2021 20: 05
    The efficiency of the military-industrial complex of the Third Reich was rather low and was based until 41-42 years exclusively on maximizing the benefits of the military-industrial complex enterprises, which hurt the country's resources. Loans, resources of the conquered countries and forced labor were able to increase the production of weapons, but in reality everything worked only in 44, when it was already too late. In 40, Hitler was forced to reduce the volume of military orders (since the products were expensive - Vaterland Vaterland, and the Reichsmark, if you please, pay your favorite Fuhrer). Here the USSR is a real corporation that could use 100% of all the country's resources, including human resources.
    And the consolidation of society in a war is a common phenomenon, to take England at 39-40, on the last gasp we got together and entered the turn.
  20. 0
    17 June 2021 21: 48
    So who was behind Hitler? Rothschilds or Rockefellers?
  21. 0
    17 June 2021 22: 27
    Nationalists authors - you should write speeches to Putin.
    The most incomparable nonsense!
  22. 0
    18 June 2021 08: 50
    Soviet AND ANTI RUSSIAN propaganda from the grave of the USSR
    If we discard all the slag and this is 90 percent of this article, then the main question arises:
    And why did Hitler not end the war with the British Empire attack the USSR?
    And the answer is more than obvious
    Comrade Stalin's group worked for the British ... And the proof of this will be the joint Soviet-British special operation against Germany in Yugoslavia - a military coup
    As it is now known, the British agent comrade Beria, together with other comrades from the Stalin team, cleaned out all the German agents in the army and other places
    The so-called "old Bolsheviks" were not just German spies and agents, but often they were just Germans, Austrians, Hungarians, and so on. from former prisoners of war.
    After such a turn in Germany, they came to the conclusion that the USSR would fight on the side of Great Britain.
    PS The author of this opus should know
    that the industrialization of the USSR was carried out by the United States and for American loans guaranteed by the American government
    And what is most interesting, loans and guarantees were received even before the establishment of the dip. relationship .....
    In other words, when Hitler was given small amounts of cash in the USSR, the Americans built a new economy and industry.
    So think now who fought with whom
  23. 0
    11 August 2021 12: 43
    I was already scared. I think where the "oppositionists" are with Putin. VO is straight empty. But no, here they are darlings ...