Military Review

Russia accused the United States of violating the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START-3)

42

Russia accused the United States of violating the provisions of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START-3). According to the Russian Foreign Ministry, the Americans have underestimated the real number of deployed and non-deployed launchers and strategic bombers.


At the end of March this year, the United States and Russia exchanged new data on nuclear arsenals. According to them, Russia has increased the number of nuclear warheads and their carriers, while the United States, on the contrary, has reduced it. During the reporting period, Russia increased the number of nuclear warheads by nine, bringing their total to 1456 (up from 1447 in September last year). The United States has reduced the number of nuclear warheads by 100, bringing their number to 1357; in September 2020, the report indicated 1457 warheads.

During the same period, Russia put into operation three carriers of nuclear weapons, indicating the number of deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine ballistic missiles (SLBMs) ​​and heavy bombers - 517, as of September last year there were 510. The United States showed a reduction in carriers of nuclear weapons by 24 units, indicating 651 carriers (September 2020 - 675 ).

In addition, Russia increased the number of deployed and non-deployed launchers by three, indicating their number equal to 767. In turn, the United States noted that their number of launchers has not changed compared to the previous reporting period and remained the same - 800 pieces.

According to the Russian Foreign Ministry, the number of American launchers and heavy bombers exceeds the number allowed by the treaty by 101 units. The United States unilaterally removed 56 SLBM (submarine ballistic missile) launchers and 41 B-52H strategic bomber from the offset.

However, the re-equipment of the launchers was carried out in such a way that Russia cannot confirm their unsuitability for the use of nuclear weapons. In addition, the US has renamed four mines "training" and refuses to include them on the list, although the treaty does not include such a category as "training mines".

The United States does not admit Russia's accusations, claiming the accuracy of the information provided. Recall that according to the agreement, Russia and the United States must exchange data on nuclear arsenals every six months.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Artyom Karagodin
    Artyom Karagodin 24 May 2021 15: 59
    +24
    The United States unilaterally withdrew 56 launchers of SLBMs (ballistic missiles of submarines) and 41 strategic bomber B-52H from the offset


    The US has renamed four mines "training" and refuses to include them in the list, although the treaty does not include such a category as "training mines"


    And so, yes, we comply with START III.

    Either it was Trump who was preparing to end it, or Biden, having formally signed the extension, is not going to actually comply with it. It just quietly drains it, and when we start reacting, a howl will rise about the fact that Russia was the first to break it. Two-faced bastards, what else can I add ...
    1. VORON538
      VORON538 24 May 2021 16: 03
      +42
      They are not going to observe anything at all, except for their interests, which they extended to the whole world after the collapse of the USSR. hi
      1. knn54
        knn54 24 May 2021 16: 13
        +24
        - The USA renamed four mines to "training" ...
        The next stage was leased to the British ...
        1. Anachoret
          Anachoret 24 May 2021 16: 19
          +16
          In a "civilized society" it is customary for gentlemen to take their word for it)))
          Since "training mines" have gone, it is quite possible that in the near future there may appear private RPKSP in the States, training strategic missile carriers and bombers))
          1. Xnumx vis
            Xnumx vis 24 May 2021 18: 38
            +1
            Quote: Anchorite
            Since "training mines" have gone, it is quite possible that in the near future there may appear private RPKSP in the States, training strategic missile carriers and bombers))

            Kids, toy warheads ... Toy planes, rackets ...
            1. military_cat
              military_cat 24 May 2021 21: 53
              -1
              Well, and why, in the end, are we going to go out? When the United States accused Russia of violating the INF Treaty, they withdrew from it.
            2. Vladimir Mashkov
              Vladimir Mashkov 25 May 2021 16: 15
              +1
              The United States has always been, is and will remain arrogant swindlers !!!
          2. Maikcg
            Maikcg 25 May 2021 04: 04
            +1
            Already laughing
            The first private fighter F-16 flew in the USA https://topwar.ru/183112-v-ssha-sovershil-polet-pervyj-chastnyj-istrebitel-f-16.html
        2. NIKN
          NIKN 24 May 2021 16: 20
          +33
          In addition, the US has renamed four mines "training" and refuses to include them on the list.
          Well, we need to rename the Tu-160M2 to Tu-160M2UB or UM (combat training) and exclude it from the lists.
          Do not throw stones, this is sarcasm rushing. :))
          1. Cananecat
            Cananecat 24 May 2021 17: 03
            +8
            Quote: NIKNN
            Well, we need to rename Tu-160M2 to Tu-160M2UB

            Developing the idea. Why only planes? Half of the arsenal should be renamed training ... laughing
          2. Stepan S
            Stepan S 24 May 2021 18: 23
            +2
            Well, we need to rename the Tu-160M2 to Tu-160M2UB or UM (combat training) and exclude it from the lists.

            You could try to check the reaction of the "partners"
          3. venik
            venik 24 May 2021 20: 18
            +3
            Quote: NIKNN
            Do not throw stones, this is sarcasm rushing. :))

            ========
            This could not have been written! And so you guessed it! good drinks
        3. Piramidon
          Piramidon 24 May 2021 16: 36
          +7
          Quote: knn54
          - The USA renamed four mines to "training" ...
          The next stage was leased to the British ...

          And three portions of barbecue were thrown into the abyss. laughing
        4. Artem76
          Artem76 24 May 2021 17: 12
          +1
          Okay, the British, they will hand over the PMCs to the military personnel, and they will wash their hands, I am not me and the house is not mine ...
      2. zloybond
        zloybond 24 May 2021 16: 44
        +8
        Thus, they (the USA) will not destroy chemical weapons in any way, but the whole world is accused of violating and chemical attacks.
      3. Machito
        Machito 24 May 2021 17: 09
        +1
        Quote: VORON538
        They are not going to observe anything at all, except for their interests, which they extended to the whole world after the collapse of the USSR. hi

        The entire solar system and alpha Centauri are in the exclusive zone of American interests.
        We need to act in the same way as the United States: to transfer the latest systems of Sarmat, Vanguard, Dagger, Poseidon to the category of training. And immediately start building training Barguzins.
      4. yehat2
        yehat2 25 May 2021 10: 37
        0
        Now bilateral agreements without China are becoming more and more strange to comply with.
        Even Israel should be made clear whether it has real nuclear weapons or is it a duck.
        In addition, there are questions to Japan, Iran and a number of other countries about the presence of nuclear charges.
    2. keeper03
      keeper03 24 May 2021 17: 29
      +3
      No treaties can be concluded with the Americans! No.
      This is confirmed by many years of practice !!! am soldier
      1. Captain Pushkin
        Captain Pushkin 25 May 2021 15: 22
        0
        Quote: keeper03
        No treaties can be concluded with the Americans! No.
        This is confirmed by many years of practice !!! am soldier

        I don’t remember any of the founding fathers of the United States, who spoke out that the United States should not abide by the agreements it signed, especially with European countries.
        It seems that since then, all US administrations sacredly honor the covenants of the Founding Fathers.
  2. moreman78
    moreman78 24 May 2021 16: 01
    +3
    The United States does not admit Russia's accusations, claiming the accuracy of the information provided. Recall that according to the agreement, Russia and the United States must exchange data on nuclear arsenals every six months.

    Like, gentlemen take their word for it ...
    1. Artyom Karagodin
      Artyom Karagodin 24 May 2021 16: 04
      +7
      And the gentleman is the master of the word: he wanted - he gave, he wanted - he took it back))). Anglo-Saxon morality at its finest.
  3. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 24 May 2021 16: 05
    +4
    It is necessary to dunk this mangy "eagle" in his own shit constantly, let them justify themselves!
    1. Alexander 3
      Alexander 3 24 May 2021 16: 12
      +2
      Yes, they don't give a damn about it, the most important thing is that they have a monopoly, when will their main green argument be blown away.
  4. Bad_gr
    Bad_gr 24 May 2021 16: 07
    +7
    And what prevents our part of the mines with missiles, submarines, and planes from renaming them as training ones and not accepting them for calculations under the START-3 treaty?
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 24 May 2021 16: 50
      +2
      That was exactly what was infa that in front of the Academy of the Strategic Missile Forces, Topol M goes into the offset as a combat one.
    2. Artem76
      Artem76 24 May 2021 17: 14
      0
      We are correct, we observe everything ... It's just that the meaning of the contract is different ...
  5. paul3390
    paul3390 24 May 2021 16: 10
    -4
    Any agreement with the bourgeois makes sense only when you have the power to force them to fulfill it. Otherwise, it's just a piece of paper. But with the force - in the current 30 years of rising from its knees the Russian Federation, to put it mildly, not ah .. Not the Soviet Union, by no means .. That is why they put the device on all our indignations. And they will put it. The West is like that, gentlemen ...
  6. Ros 56
    Ros 56 24 May 2021 16: 16
    +3
    So it was not in vain that the striped ones came out of the Don, to believe them, not to respect themselves.
  7. Ural resident
    Ural resident 24 May 2021 16: 17
    +6
    First of all, the states need the treaty to stall the time before switching to hypersound. Their initiative, they do not want to, so we need to do our own way.
  8. bk316
    bk316 24 May 2021 16: 22
    0
    It would be interesting to hear from a specialist and a fierce supporter of the treaty.
    I mean old26.
  9. bk0010
    bk0010 24 May 2021 16: 23
    +1
    USA unilaterally deducted 56 launchers of SLBMs
    What is it like? Did you cut a couple of Ohio's, and broke 8 mines in the third?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Artyom Karagodin
      Artyom Karagodin 24 May 2021 16: 35
      +2
      They can also stick up with scotch tape. They will become ...
  10. Prisoner
    Prisoner 24 May 2021 16: 39
    +7
    What do you want? They are also crooks and crooks at the genetic level.
  11. seacap
    seacap 24 May 2021 16: 58
    +6
    Damn, when it finally comes that it is impossible to play cards with cheaters, that they lie like they breathe, they have had this policy for more than one hundred years. A country created with the help of the Colt and Winchester, inhabited by adventurers and escaped convicts from all over the planet.
  12. Pavel57
    Pavel57 24 May 2021 17: 01
    +3
    Petty crooks. We got used to tyrit in our pockets.
  13. prior
    prior 24 May 2021 17: 12
    +5
    The American national trait is the desire to blatantly rob others. If you do not deceive - you will not rob.
  14. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 24 May 2021 17: 56
    +2
    In addition, the US has renamed four mines "training" and refuses to include them on the list, although the treaty does not include such a category as "training mines".

    We carefully read clause 6 of Article IV of the Agreement:
    6. Launchers designed for training, can only be located at ICBM bases, training sites and test ranges. The number of silo training launchers located at each ICBM base for silo launchers of ICBMs shall not exceed one for each type of ICBM designated for that ICBM base.
  15. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 24 May 2021 18: 07
    0
    Russia accused the United States of violating the provisions of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START-3).

    It remains to decide on adequate answers. 28 comments left before me already gave all the characteristics of what happened. Is the current government ready to preserve its sovereignty in the face of total economic, political and moral pressure, or is it still waiting for an outstretched hand from the “partners”?
  16. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 24 May 2021 18: 12
    +2
    Treaties with the United States are not worth the paper and in which they are spelled out and signed.
  17. Gennady Fomkin
    Gennady Fomkin 25 May 2021 14: 09
    0
    America is also most likely working on the weapon of tomorrow - the construction of racially oriented viruses and their means of delivery / distribution. laughing
  18. Gunther
    Gunther 25 May 2021 15: 18
    0
    Quote: 30 vis
    Kids, toy warheads ... Toy planes, rackets ...


    already:

    "state-owned private company Draken International owns over a hundred aircraft, including: Dassault Mirage F.1M / B, Douglas A-4K / TA-4K Skyhawk, Aero L-159E ALCA, Aermacchi MB-339CB, MiG-21bis and MiG-21UM , Aero L-39 Albatros. "©
    so Anchorite is right, and Artyom Karagodin is right - two-faced creatures.
  19. Gunther
    Gunther 25 May 2021 15: 22
    0
    Quote: ROSS 42
    Russia accused the United States of violating the provisions of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START-3).

    It remains to decide on adequate answers. 28 comments left before me already gave all the characteristics of what happened. Is the current government ready to preserve its sovereignty in the face of total economic, political and moral pressure, or is it still waiting for an outstretched hand from the “partners”?

    "eat it, then he is eaten, but who will give him")))
    "they will not stretch their hand", they will wait until they stretch their legs.