Military Review

In the foreign press: Russian missile "Sarmat" is capable of destroying the whole of England

152

Two years ago, it was reported that in 2021, the latest intercontinental ballistic missile "Sarmat" will be put into service with missile units and formations of the Russian Federation. The RS-28 missiles, as is known from open sources, differ from those in service with ICBMs in a number of their characteristics, including new engines capable of increasing the range of this type of combat use. weapons.


The foreign press is paying attention to the early introduction of the "Sarmat" into service. Columnist Ayush Jain of the EurAsian Times, considering the combat capabilities of the RS-28, writes literally the following:

Russia will soon be deploying its most powerful ICBM. This is a Sarmat missile capable of destroying the whole of England.

It is noted that Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke openly about Sarmat in 2018. Then in the foreign press, and in the Russian liberal publications and blogs, the idea was stubbornly promoted that the latest Russian weapons, including the RS-28 "Sarmat", the hypersonic missile systems "Dagger", the combat laser systems "Peresvet", etc. are nothing more than "Kremlin animation". In some publications, this idea is being promoted to this day, but there are clearly more sober assessments. About "cartoons" - less and less.

EurAsian Times:

Warhead "Sarmat" can consist of 10-15 warheads, which are capable of reaching the target at the last stage of the flight independently of each other. It can also be Avangard hypersonic units with an unpredictable trajectory.

A few days ago in the United States, the Russian Federation's hypersonic weapons were called "an existential threat to America."

In the foreign press, the emphasis is on the fact that such warheads are extremely difficult to intercept, as well as on the fact that the Russian nuclear missile shield, after the RS-28 Sarmat is put into service, gains additional power.
152 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Orange bigg
    Orange bigg 7 May 2021 09: 54
    -4
    Something is being pulled all the time with the beginning of flight tests. The testing ground seems to be not ready yet.
    it became known that within six months, as it is said by the end of 2021, at least three launches of this intercontinental ballistic missile will be made.

    According to the data available to the news and information agency Avia.pro, the first launch will be carried out on the territory of the Kura test site, located in Kamchatka. at least two launches, as expected, at closer distances, but with a test of the maximum capabilities of the Russian hypersonic missile system.

    “Three launches of Sarmat ICBMs as part of flight design tests will be performed in 2021. The first launch of the Sarmat ICBM within the framework of flight design tests will be carried out approximately in the third quarter of this year along the battlefield at the Kura training ground in Kamchatka, ”the source said.

    https://avia.pro/news/rossiya-proizvedyot-tri-puska-samoy-groznoy-mbr-v-istorii
    1. Ilya-spb
      Ilya-spb 7 May 2021 09: 56
      +7
      Let the Queen of England be afraid. And he will bring his politicians down
      1. Orange bigg
        Orange bigg 7 May 2021 10: 00
        +19
        The Queen of England is now not at the age to be afraid in principle. I doubt that she is in a position to bring some of the politicians down, even the local British ones. All the same, the main figure there is now the Prime Minister.
        1. NIKN
          NIKN 7 May 2021 10: 10
          +17
          The English queen is an accessory, such as a key ring for keys, does not affect anything, but it seems to be as it should be.
          1. Orange bigg
            Orange bigg 7 May 2021 10: 21
            +6
            Quote: NIKNN
            The English queen is an accessory, such as a key ring for keys, does not affect anything, but it seems to be as it should be.

            By the way, its role in politics, ironically, is akin to the role of the current Great Britain in the balance of power. It seems like it's supposed to portray something out there.
            1. NIKN
              NIKN 7 May 2021 10: 25
              0
              Quote: OrangeBigg
              akin to the role of the current UK in the alignment of forces

              Yes sir. Well, what can you do, traditions to ensure their significance with shit, national peculiarities, if it were not for the laws of the chicken coop, but these are dreams, traditions do not allow us to behave differently.
              1. Alex777
                Alex777 7 May 2021 11: 03
                +4
                In vain you are so.
                Here they have a queen and there is someone to lead both Canada and Australia, and others.
                And there will be none and no "global Britain" will exist. hi
                1. NIKN
                  NIKN 7 May 2021 11: 10
                  +2
                  hi That's right, remove the keychain from the keys, all the keys will be separate. Only now it seems like the key is, but you still have to knock and ask permission to enter ... But to tell everyone that you have the key is cool. smile
                  1. Vladimir Mashkov
                    Vladimir Mashkov 8 May 2021 18: 55
                    -3
                    Know Russophobes and be afraid!
          2. bk0010
            bk0010 7 May 2021 13: 41
            +11
            Quote: NIKNN
            The Queen of England, this accessory, such as a key ring, does not affect anything
            A very common misconception:
            - The Queen of England has the right to declare war (without legislative restrictions and without explanation)
            - The Queen of England has the right to dismiss the government (similarly);
            - The Queen of England has the right to dissolve Parliament;
            - Once a year, she speaks to parliament and voices her demands in the near future (that is, in fact, forms the state’s policy).
            - appoints ministers, privy councilors, members of executive bodies and other officials. In addition, the monarch is the head of the military (British Army, Royal Navy, Royal Air Force and Intelligence).
            - discusses conditions and ratifies treaties, unions, international agreements;
            - Accredits British High Commissioners and Ambassadors, and accepts foreign diplomats.
            The Sovereign is also revered as a source of justice, and appoints judges in all types of cases.
            The general law states that the Crown “cannot be mistaken”; the monarch CANNOT BE JUDGED in court for criminal offenses.
            In fact, the queen controls ALL branches of government - legislative, executive and judicial. And finally, the monarch is the Supreme ruler of the Church of England and can appoint bishops and archbishops (that is, the head of not only secular, but also spiritual authority, which is not found anywhere in the world, even in Iran).
            ANY PERSON IN THE WORLD DOES NOT HAVE A GREATER CONCENTRATION OF AUTHORITIES. Even the Korean Juche, portrayed by the "democratic media" as an example of a dictator, nervously smokes in the hallway.
            More details: https://oko-planet.su/politik/politiklist/519671-polnomochiya-britanskoy-korolevy.html
            1. mark2
              mark2 7 May 2021 14: 21
              +4
              NO PERSON IN THE WORLD HAS A GREAT CONCENTRATION OF AUTHORITIES

              And after all this, Russia is not considered a democratic state in the eyes of the "partners", but Britain is.
              I remember that the West very often accuses Putin of usurping power, and even of dictatorial inclinations.
              Yes, Vladimir, Vladimirovich is still far from the power of the Queen of England?
              1. Charik
                Charik 7 May 2021 20: 02
                +1
                everything is the same, possibly except for the appointment of priests
            2. unhappy
              unhappy 9 May 2021 09: 44
              0
              Munchausen was also ready to declare war on England lol
              An absolute monarchy "I want it so" can actually start a war, the English queen is a props. In England they love theatrical pathos.
        2. Stepan S
          Stepan S 7 May 2021 10: 28
          +17
          It seemed to me that recently there were two main figures, Petrov and Boshirov, and the prime minister today is one, tomorrow is another.
          1. avg
            avg 7 May 2021 12: 29
            +3
            Quote: Stepan S
            It seemed to me that recently there were two main figures, these are Petrov and Boshirov,

            This is already yesterday. The guys are now global players. yes
        3. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 7 May 2021 10: 36
          +2
          Quote: OrangeBigg
          All the same, the main figure there is now the Prime Minister.

          Which the queen can remove at any time (age is not a hindrance).
        4. hrych
          hrych 7 May 2021 10: 41
          +5
          She is afraid for her great-grandchildren and for her royal, fairy-tale life, she will cling to the end with clawed paws. She has heaven on earth, but what is there? Maybe a boiler. There are plenty of premieres, her life has changed, and she is on the throne. You can't remember all of these premieres, and the last clown is no exception. Witches were exchanged for comedian showmen. True, Trump turned out to be the best "joker" - a statesman. The pianist ... Zelensky is just a reflection of the trends behind the scenes. Sarmat is certainly not for London, but for "friends" on another continent. There are less than three thousand kilometers from Moscow to London, and the INF Treaty was in the interests not of the United States, but of the royal families of Europe. Reich in one word. Therefore, they are so afraid of Iskander - the son of Oka, who with the SBCH reach someone from Prussia. And especially the Dagger scares them, and of course Poseidon. All hypersonic devices of the Russian Federation, either against the fleet, or against London and their relatives on the thrones of Belgium, Holland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark. There is also Spanish Bourbon. From the fall of the USSR and even from 1987 (the INF Treaty) to the Russian hypersound, London was in no danger at all.
        5. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 7 May 2021 10: 56
          0
          Oh yes) this shaggy miracle will still be conveyed)
      2. Snail N9
        Snail N9 7 May 2021 10: 24
        +14
        It is curious how anti-Russian hysteria is being whipped up like a "hardley likeelle" even in this report of an English newspaper: "Russian" Sarmat " could destroy Great Britain, namely Great Britain, and why not Congo or Suriname? This is how the image of the enemy is created and maintained - with such "news" that they "plan", "can", "gather", that is, there is no fact as such, there is an invented type of "intention" or "opportunity", but here the psychology of a person is taken into account, the fact that even a contrived "threat" is deposited in his head precisely as a "real threat", something that really needs to be feared. Such publications are an element of psychological warfare, an element of creating and maintaining the image of the enemy among its population.
        1. atakan
          atakan 7 May 2021 10: 46
          +1
          For 200 years we have had a constant military and espionage conflict with England, then in general a war. As they say, I would solve this muck once and forget.
          Sailing past the wreath on the water throw off the type to remember the innocent victims on those sunken islands.
          HUNDRED times have been deserved many times over.
          It's a pity the Kremlin doesn't have enough political will.
          1. Avior
            Avior 7 May 2021 13: 14
            +2
            200 years in all major conflicts - allies
            Napoleonic wars, 1 world, 2 world.
        2. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 7 May 2021 10: 57
          +3
          Well, how else?) This is the navel of the world and Russia is asleep and sees how to destroy this education with megalomania) I even feel sorry for them. So much greatness was and so everyone was buried ... now they add poisoning so that they would not forget ...
          1. Krasnodar
            Krasnodar 7 May 2021 14: 40
            -4
            Quote: carstorm 11
            Well, how else?) This is the navel of the world and Russia is asleep and sees how to destroy this education with megalomania) I even feel sorry for them. So much greatness was and so everyone was buried ... now they add poisoning so that they would not forget ...

            Why pity them then? 14th place in the HDI, we are 52nd, EMNIP. In terms of the grandeur of the military-political - do they need it now? Signs of a super successful person around the world - Rolls Royce, John Lobb and Bentley at his wife fellow (also Range Rovers guard laughing)
            Etc.
            1. carstorm 11
              carstorm 11 7 May 2021 19: 13
              +1
              Cool. Rover Chinese if that. Are there many sanctions imposed on them?
              1. Krasnodar
                Krasnodar 7 May 2021 19: 31
                0
                laughing Since 2008, although, in principle, Volvo also belongs to the Chinese, which does not make it a Knrov car.
                Who imposes sanctions? States. What are sanctions? Don't pee in my pot. That is, do not use my specific technologies, goods and services, incl. financial. Or the above list with my part of the funding. Also, I don’t buy certain products from you. Everything.
                How do they prevent them from making their own education prestigious for foreigners at the British level, collecting elite cars by hand and making, for example, an elite shoe brand? These are light examples.
                1. carstorm 11
                  carstorm 11 7 May 2021 21: 01
                  0
                  I mean that the country is forever under them. Let's imagine that they are not there?
                  1. Krasnodar
                    Krasnodar 7 May 2021 21: 12
                    -1
                    Then the rate of the national currency will directly depend on the rate of oil. No burdens in the form of sanctions.
                    No more.
                    1. carstorm 11
                      carstorm 11 8 May 2021 09: 27
                      +2
                      Do you think that our entire budget depends on the oil industry?) Seriously? What a wild thrash ...
                      1. Krasnodar
                        Krasnodar 8 May 2021 12: 06
                        -1
                        And who says that we have the entire budget for oil? laughing The ruble exchange rate - yes, the budget has to do with it
                      2. carstorm 11
                        carstorm 11 8 May 2021 13: 00
                        0
                        Generally, oil prices have not influenced the exchange rate for a long time. What even expensive analytics are talking about)
                      3. Krasnodar
                        Krasnodar 8 May 2021 13: 36
                        0
                        laughing
                        Go to Investing - follow the pattern fellow
                      4. carstorm 11
                        carstorm 11 8 May 2021 14: 11
                        +1
                        I check the courses often. There, market conditions are more important now than prices.
                      5. Krasnodar
                        Krasnodar 8 May 2021 14: 12
                        -1
                        I also ))
                        Now oil is up, the dollar (against the ruble) is down
                      6. carstorm 11
                        carstorm 11 8 May 2021 14: 30
                        0
                        And what does this mean?))) Are you arguing with yourself?))
                      7. Krasnodar
                        Krasnodar 8 May 2021 14: 35
                        0
                        I bet? lol
                        Oil up => ruble up = direct relationship fellow
                    2. carstorm 11
                      carstorm 11 8 May 2021 14: 37
                      0
                      Oil has been falling and rising throughout the year. Pick up analytics and end the circus.
                    3. Krasnodar
                      Krasnodar 8 May 2021 14: 46
                      0
                      Dollar to ruble, 52 weeks:
                      68,0563 - 80,9203 ₽
                      Oil Brent, 52 weeks:
                      USD 28,86 - 71,38
                      Today's Brent course:
                      68,23 + 0,14 (+ 0,21%)
                      Today's dollar to ruble exchange rate:
                      73,7955 -0,4445 (-0,60%)
                      Here is a circus for you, here is analytics for you fellow
                    4. carstorm 11
                      carstorm 11 8 May 2021 14: 56
                      +1
                      I said finished. Exchange analytics is not yours. Yes. From the age of 14, the course took off. Has the oil price dropped or is the market situation? Do not confuse warm and soft. for two and a half years, the rate was less than 30. Now for 60, what is the ruble 30 for?
                    5. Krasnodar
                      Krasnodar 8 May 2021 14: 59
                      +1
                      With Brent, $ 29 cost 80 rubles, with Brent for 71 - less than 70 rubles
                      Conclusion?
                      In 2014, oil fell due to shale plus sanctions, without sanctions the ruble would not have crashed so dramatically, it would have fallen "softer".
                      Market conditions laughing Russian followed exactly these factors, i.e. for the fall of the national currency exchange rate, a decrease in the solvency of the population. The biggest sanctions blow has been dealt with the longest available money
                    6. carstorm 11
                      carstorm 11 8 May 2021 15: 19
                      +2
                      Oh how? Those. there are other irritants and not just the course right? You yourself will spread rot for a long time? I dare to remind you- Then the rate of the national currency will directly depend on the rate of oil.))) Maybe not only in it, yes?))) They are fighting with us. Financially. Cutting off money and investment. Is it worth it? I think yes. Fewer bindings. But the oil rate has long ceased to be a standard
                    7. Krasnodar
                      Krasnodar 8 May 2021 15: 43
                      -1
                      Of course, there are still irritants. laughing But the main thing is oil fellow And it is absolutely true - without sanctions, the national currency exchange rate will practically not depend on these irritants (apart from the crises of the world economy, etc.), which should have been proven. hi
                      They are fighting with us. Financially. Cutting off money and investment. Is it worth it? I think yes. Fewer bindings. But the oil rate has long ceased to be a standard

                      You can also fight with the United States financially - the question is who and why. Do you understand what I mean?
                      But the oil rate has long ceased to be a standard

                      Dollar to ruble, 52 weeks:
                      68,0563 - 80,9203 ₽
                      Oil Brent, 52 weeks:
                      USD 28,86 - 71,38
                      Today's Brent course:
                      68,23 + 0,14 (+ 0,21%)
                      Today's dollar to ruble exchange rate:
                      73,7955 -0,4445 (-0,60%)
                      With Brent, $ 29 cost 80 rubles, with Brent for 71 - less than 70 rubles
                      drinks
                      .
                      for two and a half years, the rate was less than 30. Now for 60, what is the ruble 30 for?!

                      What were the volumes of oil production? Did they seem to be lowered to get out of the dive?
                    8. carstorm 11
                      carstorm 11 8 May 2021 17: 03
                      -2
                      Once again, oil dropped to 30. Why did the ruble exchange rate not fall?))) Volume? What? 30 percent of the budget. 30. Not 90. Hare already
                    9. Krasnodar
                      Krasnodar 8 May 2021 17: 33
                      0
                      In my memory, when oil fell to 30 (28 kopecks), the ruble was 80 kopecks))
                      2,5 years ago, the volume of production was reduced and it started to creep up - I don’t remember the dollar exchange rate (58 before the elections)
                    10. Krasnodar
                      Krasnodar 8 May 2021 17: 58
                      +1
                      Quote: carstorm 11
                      30 percent of the budget. 30. Not 90. Hare already

                      And once again - what does the budget and the dollar rate to the national currency have to do with it? laughing
  • STORM 12
    STORM 12 8 May 2021 01: 48
    0
    I have neglected in the city of Negros now
    1. Krasnodar
      Krasnodar 8 May 2021 01: 49
      -1
      And the children of British oligarchs?
  • bayard
    bayard 7 May 2021 11: 47
    +7
    Something too much of one "Sarmat" for the whole of Britain ... before (under Khrushchev) and five warheads were enough ... what
    The islanders are filling the price for themselves.
    And the main question, after the announced news:
    - Where else are 5 warheads ?!
    1. Lara Croft
      Lara Croft 7 May 2021 20: 55
      -1
      Quote: bayard
      Something too much of one "Sarmat" for the whole Britain ...

      Definitely.
      - Where else are 5 warheads ?!

      - WB in Gibraltar, Cyprus, Germany, Falklands, Brunei (or Oman) ....
      1. bayard
        bayard 7 May 2021 23: 02
        +1
        Nope, they won't fly so wide. It should be close to the axis of expansion.
        But Denmark, Holland and the north of Germany are possible.
  • frruc
    frruc 7 May 2021 10: 31
    -1
    The Queen's options are very limited. In the field of law, the Queen acts only on the advice of her ministers. On their advice or recommendation, she appoints chief justices, government, awards titles, and administers amnesty or commutation. UK laws do not apply to the Queen, so she cannot be sued.
    1. 2 Level Advisor
      2 Level Advisor 7 May 2021 11: 05
      +3
      here the question is not only that she acts on the advice .. let's look from the other side, she can act without advice and it will be within the law (other modern monarchs, this can not, they really are "pictures"). . and so any head of the country has advisers just for advice .. Putin and Biden are no exception - it is impossible for one person to understand everything ..
      And, by the way, while any minister does not come to her for approval, nothing serious is being decided .. is this a "decisive" person? just her capabilities are not limited, she simply does not use them 100% .. until she wants to .. and all this is in accordance with the laws .. and the fact that her "weakness" is being promoted - I think just specially - so that if something - she is of a type and not especially in business .. and it is successfully promoted - many people believe that she is a "picture" .. I also believed until I studied her capabilities and influence not from textbooks, but in essence ..
  • Olgovich
    Olgovich 7 May 2021 10: 43
    +4
    but great: one rocket, one England.

    Very economical.

    And a dozen missiles are already all over Europe. smile
    1. Xnumx vis
      Xnumx vis 7 May 2021 11: 08
      0
      Quote: Olgovich
      but great: one rocket, one England.

      Very economical.

      And a dozen missiles are already all over Europe. smile

      In principle, I like it. Don't touch us and we won't .. and finally .. The question is of course rhetorical .. And if there are thirty Sarmatians ...? Thirty Sarmatian Horsemen of the Apocalypse !! Horror !!!!
      1. Fan-fan
        Fan-fan 7 May 2021 11: 25
        0
        You shouldn't like this "bullshit". There are 55 cities in the UK with a population of over 100. And you have to spend several charges on London and large cities. And also airbases and seaports and other military facilities. And also nuclear power plants, in total, at least a hundred charges are needed. Sarmat has 10 or 15 charges - clearly not enough.
        1. Humpty
          Humpty 7 May 2021 17: 30
          -2
          Quote: Fan-Fan
          in total, at least a hundred charges are needed. Sarmat has 10 or 15 charges - clearly not enough.

          And their brother humiliated them, they smelled something about Russia. He said that one warhead is enough for you so that Britain will never be reborn again, it is important to know where. He was joking of course, but they took it seriously.
      2. NDR-791
        NDR-791 7 May 2021 11: 26
        -3
        Quote: 30 vis
        And if thirty Sarmatians ...?

        Gyyy))) And also a rubber warhead - "Destroyed 10 cities, but it still jumps !!!" angry
    2. Doctor
      Doctor 7 May 2021 11: 49
      -5
      but great: one rocket, one England.

      Very economical.

      And a dozen missiles are already all over Europe.

      All nuclear weapons in the world will completely destroy an area of ​​approximately 600 square kilometers
      These are France, Ukraine, Madagascar. Or by regions - Arkhangelsk region, Florida.
      Just nothing. wink
      1. dali
        dali 7 May 2021 20: 42
        0
        Quote: Arzt
        All nuclear weapons in the world will completely destroy an area of ​​approximately 600 square kilometers
        These are France, Ukraine, Madagascar. Or by regions - Arkhangelsk region, Florida.
        Just nothing.

        Want to experiment? belay
        Yes ... and the calculations in the studio ... !!!
        1. Doctor
          Doctor 7 May 2021 23: 38
          0
          Want to experiment? belay
          Yes ... and the calculations in the studio ... !!!

          Impact on London 800 Kt. In Sarmat - 10 or more, 750 each.



          Zone 2 - diameter 6,5 km, area 134 sq. Km

          UK area - 243 sq. Km
          It will take 1819 warheads to cover the entire country.
          We have 1000 on land and 900 in other carriers, but those are smaller - 500 Kt.

          The British are almost enough, and France is 2 times more.
          Let the States beat them on them. laughing
          1. region58
            region58 8 May 2021 21: 11
            0
            Quote: Arzt
            1819 warheads will be needed.

            Quote: Fan-Fan
            at least a hundred charges are needed.

            You seem to even want to destroy the germs of Aglitsk ... smile
            1. Doctor
              Doctor 8 May 2021 21: 29
              0
              You seem to even want to destroy Aglitsky microbes ... smile

              No, I'm not that bloodthirsty.))
              Just in the title - one Sarmat will destroy the whole of England. As I understand it, I mean the area of ​​the country.

              If there are 15 BGs of 750 each in Sarmat, then the total area of ​​zone 2 will be about 1900 sq. km
              And only big London - 1500.
              So not enough for England. request
              1. region58
                region58 8 May 2021 21: 34
                0
                Quote: Arzt
                means the area of ​​the country.

                Well, this is unnecessary, already indicated below what is considered sufficient
                Quote: Old26
                elimination of it as a managed structure)
  • Poetry
    Poetry 7 May 2021 10: 58
    +1
    Russian murderers poison people with a "newbie".
    Russian Winnie the Pooh walks with PYATACHK.
    They will come. Soviet Cheburashka with Crocodile.
    Those who have not yet come there will come.

    The bearded Pop walks, brandishing a censer,
    There comes the Aggressor, hefty like Godzilla.
    And standing on the Waterloo bridge, Andryukha from Penza,
    Will cynically spit on the murky waters of the Thames.

    Above Buckingham Palace is the Russian flag.
    The Russian turned, and in English: "Fak !!!"
    Canteens will open everywhere,
    These will be everywhere, stocky and narrow-minded.

    Barbarians will break all traditions, both this and that ...
    The old queen will be sent to Vorkuta as a stage.
    The pound sterling will be abolished. They will switch to rubles.
    Drink Crimean wines. No fucking Chablis! ..

    They will then find all who are hidden somewhere.
    They will come to your heart's content, yakut with a Buryat.
    Chechens will dashingly dance the legendary "Lezginka"
    The British will sit back in shock ...

    Corners are circling in the English sky.
    British soldiers poop in diapers.
  • den3080
    den3080 7 May 2021 11: 24
    +2
    Ayush Jain of the Eurasian Times probably knows that Great Britain is made up of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
    And we are talking only about England ...
    smile
    Or maybe he doesn't know, quite to himself ... winked
  • iouris
    iouris 7 May 2021 12: 37
    0
    The Queen has nothing to fear. Yes to Biden.
  • Roman1970_1
    Roman1970_1 7 May 2021 20: 33
    0
    England has its own missiles just as well. Nobody is afraid of anyone. Everybody beware
  • sabakina
    sabakina 7 May 2021 10: 30
    +2
    OrangeBigg, it is not clear from your message where the text says about the unavailability of the landfill? recourse
    1. Orange bigg
      Orange bigg 7 May 2021 10: 40
      +3
      Quote: sabakina
      OrangeBigg, it is not clear from your message where the text says about the unavailability of the landfill? recourse


      It says here.
      Construction of the infrastructure for flight tests of the Sarmat heavy intercontinental ballistic missile (RS-28 strategic complex) has begun. Work is underway in the taiga of the Krasnoyarsk Territory and should be completed in 2022. Experts believe that a measuring center for trajectory observations will be located there. The new weapon should replace the R-36M2 Voevoda complexes produced in Ukraine, it will allow to overcome any existing and promising missile defense systems.

      On December 23, 2020, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu announced plans to create a test range for the Sarmat flight tests. According to him, they plan to equip it in the area of ​​the village of Severo-Yeniseisky, Krasnoyarsk Territory. The head of the department also spoke about the construction of the necessary facilities for testing the promising Strategic Missile Forces complex at the Plesetsk cosmodrome.

      According to the plans (at the disposal of Izvestia), the creation of the infrastructure of the first stage in Severo-Yeniseisk should be completed at the end of 2022. The construction was entrusted to the Main Military Construction Directorate No. 14, which specializes in the construction of strategic facilities, including for the Strategic Missile Forces.

      https://iz.ru/1120739/anton-lavrov-aleksei-ramm/sarmat-letit-v-taigu-noveishei-rakete-gotoviat-ispytatelnuiu-bazu
  • 501Legion
    501Legion 7 May 2021 10: 43
    0
    are you in a hurry somewhere? everything has its time, I personally think so, there are also smart people sitting and counting everything and how
  • Alex777
    Alex777 7 May 2021 10: 59
    0
    Something is being pulled all the time with the beginning of flight tests.

    We need successful tests.
    Not faster, but on time. hi
  • For example
    For example 7 May 2021 09: 55
    +8
    I even drank a glass if the Anglo-Saxons disappeared at once.
    1. Orange bigg
      Orange bigg 7 May 2021 09: 56
      +5
      So you first drink and more than one glass, you look they will disappear.
      1. Fan-fan
        Fan-fan 7 May 2021 11: 27
        -2
        Well, they will disappear until morning, and then you have to drink again to disappear.
    2. Ilya-spb
      Ilya-spb 7 May 2021 09: 57
      +4
      I would ... drink a bottle for this
      1. SERGE ANT
        SERGE ANT 7 May 2021 10: 07
        +11
        I would drink for a week, for better health is not enough.
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 7 May 2021 10: 38
          +3
          Quote: SERGE ant
          I would drink for a week, for better health is not enough.

          Then you can drink every other day (in moderation).
      2. Orange bigg
        Orange bigg 7 May 2021 10: 11
        +10
        Quote: Ilya-spb
        I would ... drink a bottle for this

        Some liberal Gozman would probably have drunk the bottle out of grief. And with us, I'm sure the bottle would have left only for warming up before a month-long holiday. Well, nothing less. Otherwise, we will not fit into the program of the holiday.
        1. Cat Alexandrovich
          Cat Alexandrovich 7 May 2021 10: 34
          +8
          And I would quit drinking altogether! wink
        2. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 7 May 2021 10: 39
          +1
          Quote: OrangeBigg
          And with us, I'm sure the bottle would have left only for warming up before the holiday, a month long.

          I support, the words of my husband.
          1. Hagen
            Hagen 7 May 2021 11: 03
            0
            Quote: tihonmarine
            I support, the words of my husband.

            Yes, we have a whole family here !!! What an interesting relationship you have, just mysterious! laughing Seriously, I read it as "the words of a man" .... Of course, I would not drink. Because this goal will simultaneously raise topical issues on all other priority objects. Those. the work is not small and responsible. But the flight missions would have already entered ... where it should be. Just in case wink
    3. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 7 May 2021 10: 35
      +3
      I would celebrate this day every year.
  • Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 7 May 2021 09: 55
    +6
    The kennel is in turmoil.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  • nnm
    nnm 7 May 2021 09: 56
    +1
    In the foreign press: Russian missile "Sarmat" is capable of destroying the whole of England

    The fighter fell asleep and in a dream bent over and pressed the red button.
    The commander runs in.
    - .... I haven't slept, soooo captain!
    - what nafig "did not sleep"! And where is the UK and Greenland, your mother ?!
    Two outfits out of turn!
    1. Egoza
      Egoza 7 May 2021 09: 58
      0
      Quote: nnm
      The fighter fell asleep and in a dream bent over and pressed the red button.

      Quote: nnm
      The fighter fell asleep and in a dream bent over and pressed the red button.

      That's it! And the Russian missile is capable of destroying not only England, but many others ... English-speaking.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 7 May 2021 10: 41
        +1
        Quote: Egoza
        That's it! And the Russian missile is capable of destroying not only England, but many others ... English-speaking.

        I think one island is enough.
  • Konstantin Gogolev
    Konstantin Gogolev 7 May 2021 10: 01
    +1
    They will declare it an inhumane weapon and end the sanctions. They do not like the superiority of others - "radishes".
  • rocket757
    rocket757 7 May 2021 10: 03
    +4
    In the foreign press, the emphasis is on the fact that such warheads are extremely difficult to intercept, as well as on the fact that the Russian nuclear missile shield, after the RS-28 Sarmat is put into service, gains additional power.
    Why do you have to do such a SHIELD? It's not because the foreign "partners" are enemies, got carried away with the preparation of SWORDS and in no way WANT to limit their aspirations!
    Everything is logical, everything is correct .... no matter how much you want to live peacefully, they do not give it!
    1. Orange bigg
      Orange bigg 7 May 2021 10: 07
      0
      .And such a SHIELD why do you have to do? It's not because the foreign "partners" are enemies, got carried away with the preparation of SWORDS and in no way WANT to limit their aspirations!
      Everything is logical, everything is correct .... no matter how much you want to live peacefully, they do not give it!

      Or maybe it's for the best. If the West did not lead an aggressive policy, you look and there would not be the same Sarmat and not only him, but the principle would not have worked, there would be no happiness, but misfortune helped.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 7 May 2021 10: 11
        +4
        Science, progress, engines have more than one!
        Military, very effective, well, too dangerous, for all of us!
      2. Mountain shooter
        Mountain shooter 7 May 2021 10: 29
        +1
        Quote: OrangeBigg
        Or maybe it's for the best. If the West did not lead an aggressive policy, you look and there would not be the same Sarmat and not only him, but this is how the principle worked, there would be no happiness, but misfortune helped

        It also helped. The bear in the den was already swimming fat (fat 2000s), and then they began to spit on him from all sides. And now, when he woke up, warmed up and roared, announced that he was not sleeping, and was fully combat-ready - they were worried. They don't like "Dagger", then "Zircon", or even "Sarmat" ...
    2. cniza
      cniza 7 May 2021 12: 21
      +2
      Quote: rocket757
      It's not because the foreign "partners" are enemies, got carried away with the preparation of SWORDS and in no way WANT to limit their aspirations!
      Everything is logical, everything is correct .... no matter how much you want to live peacefully, they do not give it!


      So they also crawled up to us at arm's length ...
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 7 May 2021 12: 52
        +1
        The dream of iDiet has come true ... but did it become safer for them? I really doubt it ...
        If sho, then we bang so that the whole world is in dust.
        1. cniza
          cniza 7 May 2021 16: 56
          +2
          I think they understand this and will just shake their nerves ...
  • Maks1995
    Maks1995 7 May 2021 10: 04
    -5
    Ah, all this is empty news. And they wrote the same about the previous missiles, and about the previous ones.

    Irresistible, elusive, indestructible. And the number of warheads is about the same.

    Naturally, newer, better, more electronic, etc. Time goes by ....
    1. Orange bigg
      Orange bigg 7 May 2021 10: 12
      -2
      .Ah, all this is empty news.

      That is, you are from the sect of witnesses to "cartoons"? Do not believe that there is a Sarmat?
      1. 2 Level Advisor
        2 Level Advisor 7 May 2021 11: 20
        0
        Well, let's just say, in fairness, he's really not on duty with warheads yet .. but he will. And faster - "Voivode" for good - it's time to change .. although, however, they are still afraid and now only the Voivode can erase England ... so it seems that their fuss is not clear - they don’t know about the Voivode? laughing but I think this is all within the framework of whipping up anti-Russian hysteria, news is being made ..
      2. Fan-fan
        Fan-fan 7 May 2021 11: 31
        0
        Honestly, there is no Sarmat on alert yet.
    2. sabakina
      sabakina 7 May 2021 10: 26
      -1
      Max1995, year of birth puts pressure on the brain or USE?
      1. Orange bigg
        Orange bigg 7 May 2021 10: 31
        -1
        Quote: sabakina
        Max1995, year of birth puts pressure on the brain or USE?


        The dictation would have failed according to the previous education system. No.
        ... they wrote the same about the previous missiles, and about the previous
    3. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 7 May 2021 10: 38
      +2
      Quote: Max1995
      Ah, all this is empty news.

      If they were empty, then the Anglo-Saxons would not tryndel about them.
      Quote: Max1995
      And the number of warheads is about the same.
      The point is not in the number of warheads, but in the means of their guaranteed delivery to the target and in their ability to overcome the enemy's air defense system.
      1. Maks1995
        Maks1995 7 May 2021 11: 05
        -3
        Come on, the left observer from the left, not profile media. Of course he scares.

        Look how excited the commentators are. They began to be rude at once, without trying to object. So right.
        Inconveniently right.

        But in reality - and about the previous systems they wrote the same thing. I remember. Only the vanguard was not shoved inside.
        And of course, Sarmat will be newer than the previous missiles.
        1. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 7 May 2021 11: 16
          +1
          Quote: Max1995
          Come on, the left observer from the left, not profile media. Of course he scares
          So now almost all Western media are an information dump that broadcasts in one key, and therefore it is problematic to name any source of trust. As a matter of fact, the left-wing observer can be much more valuable than the officials broadcasting such a blizzard, which, in terms of incompetence and stupidity, left-wing observers never dreamed of.
          Quote: Max1995
          But in reality - and about the previous systems they wrote the same thing. I remember. Only the vanguard was not shoved inside.
          So after all, nothing stands still. Previously, the T-34 was one of the best tanks.
          Quote: Max1995
          And of course, Sarmat will be newer than the previous missiles.

          You can't argue here, definitely yes
  • rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 7 May 2021 10: 23
    +1
  • Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 7 May 2021 10: 31
    +7
    Reminded.
    “The Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN walks along the corridor, muttering thoughtfully under his breath:“ Where else five? Where else five? They ask him: - What are you talking about?
    - You see, according to our estimates, five warheads are enough for the whole of Britain. And there are ten on the rocket. So we rack our brains - what to do with five more? ”
  • tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 7 May 2021 10: 36
    0
    As it is not a gentlemanly view, it means that we are one "Sarmat" in England, with 10 15 warheads, and they are 64 for us "Tridents 2" with 160 warheads.
    1. atakan
      atakan 7 May 2021 12: 01
      +2
      tralflot1832 So they also believe that they live on the angelic islands. wink
  • Andobor
    Andobor 7 May 2021 10: 37
    0
    Frightened by a misunderstanding at the exit from feudalism stuck - Papuan with diamonds.
  • Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 7 May 2021 10: 41
    +2
    This is a Sarmat missile capable of destroying the whole of England.

    Naturally. That's why it was done. Was it worth building a garden differently?
  • rusich
    rusich 7 May 2021 10: 43
    +4
    I'm not bloodthirsty. But do not mind destroying the Anglo-Saxons. How much Russia has suffered from them. The ugliest nation on planet Earth
    1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
      Sidor Amenpodestovich 7 May 2021 10: 58
      0
      Quote: rusich
      The ugliest nation on planet Earth

      Some kind of gypsy on a planetary scale. If only to deceive, steal, and sell drugs.
  • Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 7 May 2021 11: 40
    0
    Probably it makes no sense to spend something new on the WB in the event of a conflict. Well, or at least in significant numbers. Their missile defense capabilities are not comparable to the American ones; the missiles of the previous generation will be enough for them.
  • bk316
    bk316 7 May 2021 11: 43
    +1
    10-15 Vanguards - they turned it down.
    And so yes, 15 BB per island is quite enough.
  • Old26
    Old26 7 May 2021 11: 44
    +6
    Warhead "Sarmat" can consist of 10-15 warheads, which are capable of reaching the target at the last stage of the flight independently of each other. It can also be Avangard hypersonic units with an unpredictable trajectory.

    The expert just burns. The maximum number of BGs on ICBMs is no more than 10 (for SLBMs - no more than 14). This parameter has been observed for over 40 years. And how many "Vanguard" blocks will fit into the "Sarmat" MS - it is generally unknown, but certainly not even 10. The numbers that occur in relation to the number are from 2 to 5 maximum. And even then these assumptions are made on the basis of either the weight of the "Vanguard" itself - when there are 2, or only dimensions (excluding weight) - if there are 5

    Quote: Olgovich
    but great: one rocket, one England.

    Andrew! Do you believe in this replicated nonsense ???? Let us then believe the delirium that "One" Sarmat "is America, plus Europe." Delirium of the same level

    Quote: 501Legion
    are you in a hurry somewhere? everything has its time, I personally think so, there are also smart people sitting and counting everything and how

    Exactly. There is no need to rush. Acting as you suggest, you can start producing "Sarmat" after all "Voevods" are written off. And there are just over 2 dozen of them left.
    "No need to hurry" / (c) "Prisoner of the Caucasus" /

    Quote: OrangeBigg
    .Ah, all this is empty news.

    That is, you are from the sect of witnesses to "cartoons"? Do not believe that there is a Sarmat?

    Alexander! And he is ???? Three times the "mock-ups" were thrown, but the rocket itself has not yet been launched in the iron. So "by and large" it is not there yet
    1. atakan
      atakan 7 May 2021 12: 05
      -1
      Old26, The best comment for today on the article, respect.
    2. Lara Croft
      Lara Croft 7 May 2021 21: 23
      -3
      Old26 (Vladimir)

      In general, I agree with you (as a humanist), however, you contradict yourself and mislead the kind and trusting members of the forum, respectively ...
      On the one hand, you responsibly declare that:
      And how many "fit" in the MS "Sarmat" blocks "Avangard" - generally unknown, but not even 10... The numbers encountered in relation to the amount - 2 to 5 maximum.

      on the other hand, write that:
      "dummies" were thrown, but the rocket itself has not yet been launched in hardware.

      Where does the data come from then? Do you work at the Heat Engineering Research Institute?
  • cniza
    cniza 7 May 2021 12: 18
    +1
    that the nuclear missile shield of Russia after the RS-28 "Sarmat" was put into service is acquiring additional power.


    So sit on your priest straight, do not touch us and you will be fine ...
    1. xorek
      xorek 7 May 2021 17: 34
      +1
      Quote: cniza
      that the nuclear missile shield of Russia after the RS-28 "Sarmat" was put into service is acquiring additional power.


      So sit on your priest straight, do not touch us and you will be fine ...

      They do not understand Viktor and are straightforwardly masochistic, they are asking for trouble. Swedes, Poles, French, Germans, etc. I remember it in full (they sit quietly))))), now it's time to see the turn of the most cunning Angolaxos. soldier They will, but everything will be easier and without big sacrifices on our part ..
      1. cniza
        cniza 7 May 2021 17: 59
        +3
        Vitaly, they have a short memory - once every 50-100 years, they again gather in a crowd and come to us ...
        1. xorek
          xorek 7 May 2021 18: 39
          +1
          Quote: cniza
          Vitaly, they have a short memory - once every 50-100 years, they again gather in a crowd and come to us ...

          laughing good They get luli and the bastards run back, handing over their capitals ..! That's right, Victor, that's just how I don't want to fight again .. But they again call the Russians into a fight and very specifically. And what to do?
          1. cniza
            cniza 7 May 2021 18: 48
            +2
            I don't want to fight at all, I hope it will be possible to cool them by other methods ...
            1. xorek
              xorek 7 May 2021 19: 10
              0
              Quote: cniza
              I don't want to fight at all, I hope it will be possible to cool them by other methods ...

              God forbid Victor to be so! So far we are holding back, but such a squeal is worth it, you understand. Our weakness is the youth! They took it up specifically, they process their brains insolently .. But the opposition is also not feeble.
              Here we are, for example, and many other members of the forum .. We hold the system !!!! soldier Thank you guys .. hi
              1. cniza
                cniza 7 May 2021 19: 14
                +2
                We cannot relax, once we relaxed and lost our country ...
                1. xorek
                  xorek 7 May 2021 20: 10
                  0
                  Quote: cniza
                  We cannot relax, once we relaxed and lost our country ...

                  It was Victor hi ..How we were deceived (I would say it succinctly in Russian ..)
                  We almost choked with blood, from this crap and other chatter ..
                  Now again the wave has gone hysterical ... Russia then began to snap, and the main thing is what and has accumulated reserves for this particular situation ..
                  Hope we get through!
                  And the devil is not our brother, we understood at last ..
                  1. cniza
                    cniza 7 May 2021 20: 46
                    +2
                    We will not break through for the first time, and we have no choice ...
  • musorg
    musorg 7 May 2021 12: 56
    0
    Well, if in 2022. put on alert. This was previously written about.
    1. xorek
      xorek 7 May 2021 17: 39
      -1
      Quote: musorg
      Well, if in 2022. put on alert. This was previously written about.

      Yes, it seems to have already been installed, a year ago there was infa .. "Vanguard" for sure and Sarmatians .. Maybe experimentally? But I remember exactly what was going on duty. hi
  • Old26
    Old26 7 May 2021 13: 36
    +1
    Quote: musorg
    Well, if in 2022. put on alert. This was previously written about.

    Most likely they will. Possibly December 2022. Before the New Year, they will put into service a starting minimum. Officially, the complex will be put into service, although it will be put into service with the ZKP and a pair of silos.
    Therefore, it will be possible not only 3 tests in 2021, but also a certain number in 2022
  • iouris
    iouris 7 May 2021 13: 36
    -1
    I would say England, Scotland and Wales. Three times.
  • Old26
    Old26 7 May 2021 13: 37
    +5
    Quote: bk316
    10-15 Vanguards - they turned it down.
    And so yes, 15 BB per island is quite enough.

    In general, calculations show that this amount should be increased by at least three times.
  • Vladimir61
    Vladimir61 7 May 2021 13: 49
    +2
    Russia will soon be deploying its most powerful ICBM. This is a Sarmat missile capable of destroying the whole of England
    No one throws stones at a silently lying dog. Lie down, do not bark and everyone will be fine.
  • Archemor
    Archemor 7 May 2021 14: 12
    -2
    That is, all our previous missiles with separate blocks could not destroy England, but here "Hello, Dolly".
  • Old26
    Old26 7 May 2021 14: 40
    0
    Quote: Archemor
    That is, all our previous missiles with separate blocks could not destroy England, but here "Hello, Dolly".

    Do not be carried on by this nonsense. To withdraw Britain from the war (not to destroy it, but only to eliminate it as a controlled structure) requires about fifty warheads with a capacity of the order of 300-500 kt. And then 10 BGs and destroy ??? And previous missiles, and promising WILL NOT destroy a country like Britain with a single rocket
    1. Archemor
      Archemor 10 May 2021 12: 50
      0
      Apparently, I should have added "sarcasm" at the end of the commentary.
  • NF68
    NF68 7 May 2021 15: 51
    0
    Not just England.
  • xorek
    xorek 7 May 2021 17: 26
    +2
    EurAsian Times:
    Warhead "Sarmat" can consist of 10-15 warheads, which are capable of reaching the target at the last stage of the flight independently of each other. It can also be Avangard hypersonic units with an unpredictable trajectory.

    Something the Anglo-Saxons began to warm up their inhabitants directly with the "Russian threat" in recent years .. As I understand it, they want to increase the military budget at times and naturally the "kickbacks" will increase .. Actually, the USSR-Russia could have razed any country to the ground before, but we don't need it .. We want to be left alone and we don't want war, damn it fought .. soldier
    But what a world-wide persecution has now unfolded in the direction of Russia, this is the mess of the Lord .. And anything can happen! Think about it. We have nothing to lose, we will defend ourselves to the last Englishman bully
    Peace and kindness to all. ! hi
  • mihey
    mihey 7 May 2021 20: 29
    +1
    Quote: Avior
    200 years in all major conflicts - allies
    Napoleonic wars, 1 world, 2 world.

    Was the Crimean war so-so? And there was no intervention either after the revolution in October - such a small episode ...
  • Lara Croft
    Lara Croft 7 May 2021 20: 45
    0
    Russian missile "Sarmat" is capable of destroying all of England

    On "Foggy Albion" the Strategic Missile Forces can poison something simpler, we just need to destroy two targets: the main naval base in the south of England and the SSBN / SSGN / PLA in the west of Scotland ....
    1. xorek
      xorek 7 May 2021 21: 03
      +1
      Quote: Lara Croft
      Russian missile "Sarmat" is capable of destroying all of England

      On "Foggy Albion" the Strategic Missile Forces can poison something simpler, we just need to destroy two targets: the main naval base in the south of England and the SSBN / SSGN / PLA in the west of Scotland ....

      So yes .. Well, and most importantly, the "hornet" nest, we know where .. soldier

      And while we are watching .. Have they built some kind of casemates and how many floors are there below? And you need to hit not in the center (they built it on purpose) .. And everything will collapse along the edge
  • Old26
    Old26 7 May 2021 21: 18
    +4
    Quote: Lara Croft
    WB in Gibraltar, Cyprus, Germany, Falklands, Brunei (or Oman) ....

    Why such a small warhead deployment zone? Please write that the goals all over the world ... laughing

    Quote: Lara Croft
    Russian missile "Sarmat" is capable of destroying all of England

    On "Foggy Albion" the Strategic Missile Forces can poison something simpler, we just need to destroy two targets: the main naval base in the south of England and the SSBN / SSGN / PLA in the west of Scotland ....

    And others believe that at least 26 targets and 45 warheads ... And this figure has more faith than 2 you have
    1. Lara Croft
      Lara Croft 7 May 2021 22: 20
      -1
      Quote: Old26
      And others believe that at least 26 targets and 45 warheads ... And this figure has more faith than 2 you have

      Well, I took into account only two targets (respectively, and fewer warheads), and not 26, as you have ... but the destruction of "my" targets will deprive the British Navy of most of the surface fleet and all strategic nuclear forces ...
  • 123456789
    123456789 7 May 2021 22: 11
    0
    Quote: avg
    Quote: Stepan S
    It seemed to me that recently there were two main figures, these are Petrov and Boshirov,

    This is already yesterday. The guys are now global players. yes

    "Russia has only two allies - Petrov and Bashirov" Alexander III laughing
  • Old26
    Old26 7 May 2021 22: 27
    +4
    Quote: Lara Croft
    Where does the data come from then? Do you work at the Heat Engineering Research Institute?

    Not. And "Sarmat" is being developed at the GRC, and not at the Institute of Heat Engineering. It is enough just to compare the known drawings, and possible performance characteristics, to draw such conclusions.
  • Peaceful SEO
    Peaceful SEO 8 May 2021 01: 24
    0
    Quote: Arzt
    but great: one rocket, one England.

    Very economical.

    And a dozen missiles are already all over Europe.

    All nuclear weapons in the world will completely destroy an area of ​​approximately 600 square kilometers
    These are France, Ukraine, Madagascar. Or by regions - Arkhangelsk region, Florida.
    Just nothing. wink

    To destroy Europe (like the United States or Russia), you do not need to vitrify ALL of the territory. It is enough to destroy energy and transport links. And in a month or two, people themselves will die of hunger
    1. Doctor
      Doctor 8 May 2021 22: 02
      0
      To destroy Europe (like the United States or Russia), you do not need to vitrify ALL of the territory. It is enough to destroy energy and transport links. And in a month or two, people themselves will die of hunger

      Ничего подобного.
      Everyone was preparing, digging, stocking up.
      In Switzerland, every mountain tunnel has a full-fledged refuge with a couple of months in reserve.
      The Germans also have all the rules, and the rest too. The Finns are also ready for a nuclear winter, the most powerful bunkers for the entire population, even with hockey rinks, everything is dispersed and grunts for 10 years.

      And with us only the elect will be saved. wink
  • bzbo
    bzbo 8 May 2021 02: 08
    0
    Why should they be afraid of the Sarmatians. Let the Pioneers be afraid
  • Synoid
    Synoid 8 May 2021 03: 08
    0
    Quote: Avior
    ovskie wars, 1 world, 2

    With such allies and enemies is not necessary.
    And all their participation is waiting on the sidelines who will win.
  • Synoid
    Synoid 8 May 2021 03: 12
    0
    Quote: Krasnodar
    Quote: carstorm 11
    Well, how else?) This is the navel of the world and Russia is asleep and sees how to destroy this education with megalomania) I even feel sorry for them. So much greatness was and so everyone was buried ... now they add poisoning so that they would not forget ...

    Why pity them then? 14th place in the HDI, we are 52nd, EMNIP. In terms of the grandeur of the military-political - do they need it now? Signs of a super successful person around the world - Rolls Royce, John Lobb and Bentley at his wife fellow (also Range Rovers guard laughing)
    Etc.

    HDI? A kind of AIDS? Well, and the fact that they built all this on the blood of others / earned over hundreds of years of occupation of other countries (including your people), are they trifles? The main thing is that Rolls Royce and Ranger Rovers.
  • Synoid
    Synoid 8 May 2021 03: 16
    0
    Quote: Fan-Fan
    You shouldn't like this "bullshit". There are 55 cities in the UK with a population of over 100. And you have to spend several charges on London and large cities. And also airbases and seaports and other military facilities. And also nuclear power plants, in total, at least a hundred charges are needed. Sarmat has 10 or 15 charges - clearly not enough.

    Only large industrial centers are subject to destruction.
    The rest will kill each other for food and water.
  • Sergei Timofeich
    Sergei Timofeich 8 May 2021 05: 05
    0
    All in all, the bassists need to sit and not twitch, then the pants will be clean ...
  • flicker
    flicker 8 May 2021 22: 05
    0
    Russian missile "Sarmat" is capable of destroying all of England

    And "Poseidon" is able to destroy the underwater sea bunkers of those who do manage to escape from England (and other places) yes bully
  • Old26
    Old26 9 May 2021 14: 52
    +3
    Quote: Arzt
    Ничего подобного.
    Everyone was preparing, digging, stocking up.
    In Switzerland, every mountain tunnel has a full-fledged refuge with a couple of months in reserve.
    The Germans also have all the rules, and the rest too. The Finns are also ready for a nuclear winter, the most powerful bunkers for the entire population, even with hockey rinks, everything is dispersed and grunts for 10 years.

    And with us only the elect will be saved.

    Well, there will be a supply for a couple of months, and then what? And how many tunnels the Swiss have to accommodate 8,5 million people with food supplies for a couple of months.
    And Finland? 5,5 million people, and a 10-year supply of grub? Is that humor? NO COUNTRY OF THE WORLD sets itself the goal of saving the entire population of the country and feeding them in shelters for SEVERAL YEARS. This is NOT PHYSICAL. In any case, not everyone will be saved, but only a select few. EVERYWHERE, not just here in Russia
  • Peaceful SEO
    Peaceful SEO 10 May 2021 15: 05
    0
    Quote: Arzt
    To destroy Europe (like the United States or Russia), you do not need to vitrify ALL of the territory. It is enough to destroy energy and transport links. And in a month or two, people themselves will die of hunger

    Ничего подобного.
    Everyone was preparing, digging, stocking up.
    In Switzerland, every mountain tunnel has a full-fledged refuge with a couple of months in reserve.
    The Germans also have all the rules, and the rest too. The Finns are also ready for a nuclear winter, the most powerful bunkers for the entire population, even with hockey rinks, everything is dispersed and grunts for 10 years.

    And with us only the elect will be saved. wink

    And why Switzerland with the Fritz why food tunnels? Nobody will bomb them. Military bases and power plants will equalize and that's it.