"Red zone of Russia": assessment of the situation
Source: wikimedia.org
Disputes about "historical truth ”and monuments, in fact, miss the main thing for a correct assessment of the situation in which not only our country, but all of humanity finds itself. The main point from which to proceed when assessing the situation is that already at the end of the XNUMXth century a war began for the division and redivision of the world. The income of the colonial powers from the slave trade and slave labor declined. And at the heart of the ideology of these "civilized" countries has always been and is what at one time was formulated by a hitherto unknown anonymous thinker.
Before the Great French Revolution in 1755, he published a book: "The Code of Nature or the True Spirit of its Laws" under the pseudonym Morelli. In this book, its main idea is formulated as follows:
“The only vice I know in the universe is greed; all other vices, no matter what name they are given, represent only its shades and degrees ... Analyze vanity, fatness, pride, ambition, cunning, hypocrisy, villainy; decompose even most of our false virtues into their component parts - everywhere you will end up with this subtle destructive element - covetousness. You will find it even at the bottom of selflessness.
Meanwhile, could this general plague - private interest, this debilitating fever, this destructive disease of every society - could it take root where it would never find not only food, but also no dangerous pathogen?
I think that no one will argue with me against the obviousness of the following proposition: where there would be no property, none of its harmful consequences could exist. "
(Cit. Op. Publishing house of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1956, pp. 80–81).Meanwhile, could this general plague - private interest, this debilitating fever, this destructive disease of every society - could it take root where it would never find not only food, but also no dangerous pathogen?
I think that no one will argue with me against the obviousness of the following proposition: where there would be no property, none of its harmful consequences could exist. "
The goals of British and American imperialism
Therefore, it is quite understandable that from local small wars the "powers" have moved on to world ones. The First World War was an imperialist war for the political and economic division and redivision of the world. One can hardly argue with this. This war ended with the Versailles Peace Treaty, which meant plunder and humiliation of the German people.
It is clear that after a while this "backfired" with the coming to power of the Nazis. At the same time, the "victorious powers" saw the collapse of the Russian Empire, caused by the mediocrity of the autocracy. They saw new prey and, under various pretexts, began to intervene against our country. But they did not succeed. The people rose up and liberated their land from the interventionists and the White movement, which was seen as a class enemy supported by foreign capital.
The results of the First World War provided an incentive for the next war. German capital and Japanese militarists demanded a new redivision of the world. The winners of the last war did not want to fight and therefore began to feed the Nazis with handouts in the form of Austria, Czechoslovakia, etc. In fact, the Second World War did not start in 1939 or 1941, but earlier, when Germany invaded Austria in Europe. And in Asia, already in 1931, Japan invaded China. Italy in 1936 in Africa captured Ethiopia.
Only when it came to Poland, with which Britain and France had concluded a corresponding treaty, they had to start a war with Germany, which is called "strange" in all sources. Their main goal was to set Germany against the USSR and profit from it. Therefore, it is not surprising that the behavior of the so-called "allies" in 1941-1945. Their troops marched anywhere, but not in Germany: in North Africa, in Italy, in the Balkans, etc. They fought where the USA, after the death of the USSR, began to show their imperialist essence. They went against Germany only when the outcome of the war became clear, and it was possible to plunder a weakened and exhausted Germany with impunity. Therefore, for British and American imperialism, the Second World War could not end in 1945, since the goals set by the ruling circles of the United States and the British Empire, thanks to the sacrifices of the peoples of the USSR, were not achieved.
Therefore, with a big reservation, it should be said that the Second World War began with the German attack on Poland. As well as the fact that the Great Patriotic War was a war between fascism and communism. To some extent, the war against the USSR was indeed a war of ideologies. But not only. The war that ended for us with the surrender of Germany in 1945 was a war for the survival of the peoples of the Soviet Union from the attack of imperialist predators. However, unlike the First World War, it did not end with the conclusion of peace treaties. In reality, the act of unconditional surrender of Germany led to its occupation by the victorious powers.
But the Anglo-Saxons were not satisfied with this. In Fulton's speech, Churchill announced the continuation of World War II for the achievement of world domination by the Anglo-Saxons. Now, unfortunately, few people remember this speech. But in vain. Here are some of the comments of the head of the USSR at that time:
“It should be noted that Mr. Churchill and his friends are strikingly reminiscent of ... Hitler and his friends. Hitler started the war by proclaiming a racial theory, declaring that only people who speak German represent a full-fledged nation. Churchill also begins the work of unleashing the war with a racial theory, arguing that only the nations that speak English are full-fledged nations, called upon to decide the fate of the whole world. "
(Stalin I. V. Works, volume 16).The Second World War entered a new stage, which was called the Cold War. From time to time, the cold gave way to skirmishes in "hot spots". Nor did the USSR's attempt to agree on good at the Helsinki Conference helped to end the war. The Act adopted at this conference and the creation of the OSCE became a new good cover for the imperialists. It was an outright surrender of positions, which, after the betrayal of the Gorbachev leadership, ended with the collapse of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact.
A characteristic feature of the new stage of the war was the actual occupation of Europe by the US army with the help of an obvious lie about NATO, which is nothing more than a unit of the American army under the command of an American general. That is why the so-called European Union does not dare to utter a word in defense of its legitimate economic and political interests. The education, called the G7, is actually a godfather (USA) and his “sixes”. Sorry for the thieves' terminology, but it is very difficult to define otherwise the current situation in the world.
At this stage of the Second World War, not only the alignment of forces changed, but also the forms of warfare. It is clear that now it is no longer possible to drive millions of people into the trenches. Yes, and it is useless with modern technology and technology for the destruction of people. Therefore, everything begins to build on a primitive deception, when representatives of countries using weapon mass destruction of people de facto, accuse the victim country of having (not using) weapons of mass destruction. Under this pretext, a war begins to overthrow the government and destroy the state system. Well, on the sly, robbery and the most primitive robbery of territories and peoples. For such actions, you first need to prove to everyone that the destruction of people and the seizure of the wealth of foreign peoples is a noble deed and that this is a requirement of the "world community", their "developed and civilized". This lie is called information war.
The second theater of war is economics and finance. Let us remember that imperialist wars are waged to seize sources of resources and sales markets. To do this, you can overthrow an unwanted government and bring to power a new one, which will give the right to develop natural resources to the right company and will not allow foreign competitors to enter its market. Previously, this was done.
Now these goals can be achieved in a different, calmer, more efficient and cheaper way. At one time, the export of capital was used for these purposes. It's better than fighting, but still expensive. Therefore, it is economically profitable to export money instead of exporting real capital and real investments. As noted in the previous article, modern money is nothing more real than the promises of banks, which can be used if in the country where you have bank obligations to you, you can exchange them for something worthwhile. If you are denied the sale of goods, then you resemble a primitive society that gives gold for beads.
Monetary security of Russia
Therefore, the country's leadership must thoroughly think over the problem of the monetary security of the state. This does not require changing Article 75 of the Constitution on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. You just need to relieve this strange organization of functions unusual for central banks, leading to conflicts of interest. I will not list everything, except for some obvious solutions. Why not transfer all foreign exchange transactions of Russian organizations with foreign ones to Vnesheconombank or VTB? Why not restore the State Bank of Russia with the monopoly right to issue banknotes, execute the state budget and refinance credit institutions? Why not transfer control over the issue of securities to the State Duma Committee, and control over financial markets to Rosfinmonitoring? Why not approve the maximum lending rate when approving the state budget? And more ... hundreds of "why".
Oddly enough, it is worth learning from the enemy. So, in 1929, the US stock market collapsed, and the world economic crisis began. The US leadership could not do anything until Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected president of the country.
His first radio address to the nation on May 7, 1933 read:
“Even before I took office, I had come to the conclusion that Americans should not be forced to bear the burden of such a policy. This would mean not only the further loss of homes, farms, savings and wages by people, but also the loss of spiritual values - a loss of confidence in the present and future, which is so necessary for the peace of mind and contentment of each person and his family.
Once these values are destroyed, it will be difficult to regain people's trust. And it is clear that neither the naked calls for confidence emanating from Washington, nor additional loans to faltering financial institutions, could stop the downward movement.
I realized that it was necessary to implement an urgent program of action, it was not only justified, but also absolutely necessary for national security. "
Once these values are destroyed, it will be difficult to regain people's trust. And it is clear that neither the naked calls for confidence emanating from Washington, nor additional loans to faltering financial institutions, could stop the downward movement.
I realized that it was necessary to implement an urgent program of action, it was not only justified, but also absolutely necessary for national security. "
And he did it.
But first he decided on what led to the crisis, and at the very beginning he said that
“The government can and should seriously influence economic forces. The main thing is to prevent repetition, when people were seized by the pursuit of unearned wealth, and their leaders in all spheres of activity did not want to know anything except their own selfish interests and easy money. "
To get out of the crisis, he did the following.
1. Enacted the community code, according to which everyone agreed to raise wages for workers and shorten the working week in order to reduce unemployment.
2. Organized public works for the protection of nature and garbage collection, as well as the construction of infrastructure at the expense of the budget, and not for the benefit of private capital, which collects money from the population with reduced domestic demand.
3. He requisitioned all the gold and forbade its sale to anyone other than the government, which set the prices for the gold he purchased.
4. Banned the export of capital from the country.
A very strong approach - ours would eat a calf and a wolf. It's time to understand that those who profited from the collapse of the USSR and the entire socialist bloc do not hesitate to sell Russia. According to national accounts, in 2019, 6,8 trillion rubles were exported from the country from property income - more than all state budget spending on national defense and law enforcement.
Why should the government, which has not hesitated to freeze the pension savings of the population, decide to ban the payment of dividends to shareholders until an acceptable level of economic growth in the country is restored?
You shouldn't count on foreign investments. Isn't it time to start using your internal savings?
Information