Americans have convincingly bragged about the accuracy of their missiles

The Americans boasted high-precision ammunition. A convincing selection of photographs has appeared in The Drive.

There were shots of the final moments of various ammunition hitting the target / target, taken during various tests. The photo includes cruise, anti-ship, anti-tank and anti-radar missiles, loitering ammunition, bombs, etc.

Most people don't really understand how large the amount of high-precision weapons... (...) their accuracy is simply amazing

- writes the edition.

So, to the selection:

Comments

[figwam]

What else can the most "democratic" country in the world boast about? Yes, only in symbols of "democracy" and militarism.

[Ross xnumx]

Russia, looking at American "activity", should have demonstrated the accuracy of its own missiles long ago not at the Kuru test site in Kamchatka and not in Kazakhstan, but in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico.

[Hunter 2]

And I like this news more, it's a pity I can't insert the video ...
The US military has failed exercises to eliminate a mock enemy vessel. The decommissioned ship "Fatch", which according to the plan was to sink from one blow, the US naval forces could not destroy 12 hours. First, the ship's hull was hit by an anti-ship missile "Harpoon", launched from a submarine, then they tried to bomb the ship from another frigate and even from the air. However, "Fatch" showed amazing resilience. It withstood seven missile attacks from ships and helicopters, then the decommissioned frigate began to destroy B-52 aircraft and F-18 fighters. However, even after that "Fatch" remained afloat. The submarine delivered the final blow - it hit the side of the frigate with an old torpedo, but the frigate did not sink immediately, but only the next morning.

[mitroha]

The Americans boasted high-precision ammunition. Convincing

Hmmm
Now, with the development of software, it is possible to convincingly prove that you spilled Queen Elizabeth or she Biden, depending on the wishes of the customer.

[military_cat]

Quote: Mitroha

Now, with the development of software, it is possible to convincingly prove that you spilled Queen Elizabeth or she Biden, depending on the wishes of the customer.

What is the point, then, to come anywhere news to read?

[mitroha]

This question applies to you as well. For this, a person is given a brain, reason and critical thinking in order to weed out information trash. Another thing is that not everyone wants to use it.

[military_cat]

Critical thinking assumes that each statement must be accompanied by the reasons on which it was made. A statement that makes sense "this is a fake" must be accompanied by indications of signs of fake, otherwise it is just a conspiracy theory.

[mitroha]

Quote: military_cat

must be accompanied by the reasons on which it was made.

I'm stunned .... And the statement about the launch of non-existent missiles from real launchers?

[military_cat]

For statements of omission, data from the cameras are given, and this is quite a significant basis - as long as there is no indication of specific signs showing the falsification of the corresponding data. There are no indications of such signs.

[mitroha]

I can give you the filming of Biden in adult films. And what will you do? Will you kill yourself?

[military_cat]

I will point out the signs of forgery (if I set myself the goal of refuting the thesis).

[mitroha]

And if the shooting is real, but the frames are torn from different "films"?
And this, let's indicate the signs of reality in these pictures

[military_cat]

I will give links to primary sources.

[mitroha]

That is, in your reality, the primary sources do not lie a priori?

[military_cat]

You talked "if the shooting will be real", that is, we were talking about examples that were obviously not fake.

Concerning "let's show the signs of reality in these pictures" - this is the requirement to "bring evidence to evidence", such a formulation of the question does not allow considering anything at all in principle, since evidence for evidence can be required indefinitely. Critical thinking cannot be satisfied with this approach. Therefore, evidence is provided, and the next step is a counterargument for the given evidence (if any).

[mitroha]

Blablabla, well, honestly ...

[military_cat]

Clear. I see that there is no counter-argument.

[Revolver]

Quote: Mitroha

I can give you the filming of Biden in adult films.

He's been impotent for a long time.

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: Mitroha

with the development of software, it can be conclusively proven that you spit the queen

Here in the joke "What, he shoots so well? - No, he draws a target around the arrow!"

[tralflot1832]

Rosacharuya, all combustible and explosive materials are taken out of the target ship. Fuel tanks are freed not only from fuel, but also vapors, possibly filled with water. The compartments are not only battened down, but also welded where the design allows. The target ship must live a long time. And when necessary for advertising, our T 72 shatters into molecules even before the vaunted Javelin hits.

[Hunter 2]

Mutually disappointing .... apparently for survivability on the target ship - the "strike" squad of ship rats fought and it is simply physically impossible to remove all combustible materials from the Ship. Its poor and missiles (in which, in addition to explosives, there is also fuel, and bombs, and a cart ... plus were fired off by torpedoes). So it's a rather weak argument I repeat - they were not firing at him with Blanks. Find videos online.

[tralflot1832]

I saw it, I immediately thought that it was cleaned thoroughly. Look for what one missile did like with the "Stark" when Iran fought with Iraq. Exactly, the Stark Iraqi Mirage fired two Exocets by mistake.

[Sergey Sfiedu]

The Stark had an aluminum superstructure, and the Exocet had a running engine. And I remember he didn't sink either. And even Sheffield suffered for a long, long time after the crew left it.

[novel66]

Alex, hi! I will remind "Sheffield" again, one Exocet was enough, and to the bottom

[Hunter 2]

Hi Roma! And one Unexploded Exocet!

[novel66]

Moreover, unexploded bombs and missile warheads were the norm for the Argentines. American, for a second ...

[Ingenegr]

And also MRK "Monsoon" was killed by one target missile ...

[tralflot1832]

And one fool, if I'm not mistaken, "Ardent", who volunteered to de-mine the American bonbo of the Second World War that did not explode. I would lie there. And then ours in the Malvin swarm were catching a meter blue whiting, probably for a reason.

[Pilat2009]

Quote: Hunter 2

Mutually disappointing .... apparently for survivability on the target ship - the "strike" squad of ship rats fought and it is simply physically impossible to remove all combustible materials from the Ship. Its poor and missiles (in which, in addition to explosives, there is also fuel, and bombs, and a cart ... plus were fired off by torpedoes). So it's a rather weak argument I repeat - they were not firing at him with Blanks. Find videos online.

You will search how our missiles were tested by ships

[Maikcg]

With some rockets, even similar targets get hurt.

[Doccor18]

I take it Fatch is an O.H. Perry-class frigate?
Then it is very surprising how tenacious this platform turned out to be. And you can't tell ...

[tlauicol]

That's what the target is, so that it doesn't sink longer. Ours, too, have been torturing the same tug for years on Top.

[Alex_You]

The US military has failed exercises to eliminate a mock enemy vessel. The decommissioned ship "Fatch", which according to the plan was to sink from one blow, the US naval forces could not destroy 12 hours.

The concentration of troops near one frigate is impressive. A submarine, ships, even an entire aircraft carrier with an F-18 participated, and even a one-piece B-52 which has nothing to do with the fleet. Maybe this was the idea, and the fire was fired with training ammunition?

[sabakina]

Quote: Hunter 2

And I like this news more, it's a pity I can't insert the video ...
The US military has failed exercises to eliminate a mock enemy vessel. The decommissioned ship "Fatch", which according to the plan was to sink from one blow, the US naval forces could not destroy 12 hours.

Alexey, are you talking about this video?

[Flooding]

Quote: Hunter 2

sorry vidio can not insert.

from topnews.ru

[mvg]

It withstood seven missile strikes from ships and helicopters

Is it okay that the target is specially prepared so that it does not immediately drown? Aren't they shooting with warheads?
News sucked from the finger by another whore journalist.
If in reality, look at the Iranian crisis of 1988, how they fought for the life of a frigate after a mine was blown up.
No modern ship will like an anti-ship missile, not even one as small as the Exocet. Watching the fate of Sheffield and Atlantis.

[hohol95]

The decommissioned ship "Fatch", which according to the plan was to sink from one blow, the US naval forces could not destroy 12 hours.

News from 2016.
In 4 years, American digital technology has improved and "photomontage" has become more realistic.

[Pilat2009]

Quote: hohol95

The decommissioned ship "Fatch", which according to the plan was to sink from one blow, the US naval forces could not destroy 12 hours.

News from 2016.
In 4 years, American digital technology has improved and "photomontage" has become more realistic.

They just made a storyboard

[hohol95]

I do not give a damn".
Storyboard or something new and digital!
I still remember footage of the destruction of Iraqi bunkers in 1991! Beautifully so the rockets dived, the Cross was on the target. The picture is black and white.
And in the end.
And the Patriot air defense missile system came out almost like a "zilch" (SCUDs in the desert fell on their own, and those that did not fall reached their targets, there was a global panic in Israel) and the Iraqis threw tanks with bunkers out of fear and panic (after the battles, the Americans "cut the sturgeon "(for myself) about the mass of equipment destroyed by the strikes of their Air Force and NAVY).
The "disease of the German gaze" happened to them - they were constantly looking at the sky! These are their problems - they had to learn how to work with air defense systems and adequately study their own experience of the war with Iran!
And our "make" such pictures with static targets!

[region58]

Quote: Hunter 2

should have sunk from one blow, the US naval forces could not destroy 12 hours

If you look from the other side - the ship turns out to be very tenacious ...
I wonder if they prepared it for the target, or left it "as it is"?

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Hunter 2

And I like this news more, it's a pity I can't insert the video ...

And how I like it:

But I like this more:

And this:

To be honest, I did not expect such a reaction to my message. I am at a loss to guess what the users did not like (and which ones): the unheard-of audacity with which the Russian Strategic Missile Forces could demonstrate the accuracy of the Russian missile hits; the photographs on display, some of which (by authenticity) can be compared with the filming of the American landing on the moon or the inability to film the process on video, as is done here:

Although, of course, blurry photographs can serve as genuine proof of the accuracy of American missiles and the lagging behind in this issue of Russian ones, isn't it, gentlemen minusators?

[VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK]

Well done, everything is correct! And the pictures in the article can be, if not a photomontage, then a 1% successful hit recorded by the camera! The whole world knows how Americans lie! Even if the truth is they have no faith!

[Pilat2009]

Quote: Hunter 2

And I like this news more, it's a pity I can't insert the video ...
The US military has failed exercises to eliminate a mock enemy vessel. The decommissioned ship "Fatch", which according to the plan was to sink from one blow, the US naval forces could not destroy 12 hours. First, the ship's hull was hit by an anti-ship missile "Harpoon", launched from a submarine, then they tried to bomb the ship from another frigate and even from the air. However, "Fatch" showed amazing resilience. It withstood seven missile attacks from ships and helicopters, then the decommissioned frigate began to destroy B-52 aircraft and F-18 fighters. However, even after that "Fatch" remained afloat. The submarine delivered the final blow - it hit the side of the frigate with an old torpedo, but the frigate did not sink immediately, but only the next morning.

Usually, targets are specially stuffed with everything that keeps them afloat, otherwise there will simply not be enough targets. Well, most likely the missiles were without warheads.

[rtutaloe]

It still seems to me that this article about Fatch is a bunch of lies. You came to the shooting range to shoot at targets. Usually there is one, well, two airs. If the shooting range is airsoft, there are only airsoft automatics. But if the target does not fall, then no one will give you a real PM, a grenade, or a tank. So it is here. The submarine went to the exercises - the submarine will shoot, well, maybe a couple of ships from the compound will shoot. But the B-52 will definitely not arrive. If the coastal defense is working, then most likely they can request air support during the exercises, but the entire US army and navy will not bomb one target.

[Texas]

This is a feature, not a bug.

[Alexander Terentyev]

Probably, the submarine rammed - the only way to sink the barge.

[Observer2014]

Quote: figvam

What else can the most "democratic" country in the world boast about? Yes, only in symbols of "democracy" and militarism.

You envy. Envy silently. If you can do better. So "smog" And show what you can.

[figwam]

Quote: Observer2014

You envy. Envy silently. If you can do better. So "smog" And show what you can.

You have probably been in suspended animation in recent years, but I will remind you that our cruise missiles reach the building from a thousand kilometers away, just like KABs from drones used in Syria, and not at a test site in sterile conditions.

[Observer2014]

Quote: figvam

Quote: Observer2014

You envy. Envy silently. If you can do better. So "smog" And show what you can.

You have probably been in suspended animation in recent years, but I will remind you that our cruise missiles reach the building from a thousand kilometers away, just like KABs from drones used in Syria, and not at a test site in sterile conditions.

TATSHO! I didn’t know, I didn’t see it, I didn’t catch the moment. What kind of missiles? Imagine the same video quality as in the article. Weak ?!

[figwam]

Quote: Observer2014

Imagine the same video quality as in the article.

Have you been banned in Google?

[Observer2014]

Have you been banned in Google?

Yeah, banned, banned and not banned But, mlyn, where are our missiles hitting the target with such quality video materials, where?

[Rostislav]

Maybe photos of tankers, bunkers and terrorist training camps destroyed in Syria are better suited as evidence?
The Yankees were too shy to upload photos of the destroyed excavators. Probably the quality of the photo turned out to be low.

[Dikson]

You still remember about the famous shooting exercises .. with comments about "accurate hits" ....

[sabakina]

Quote: Observer2014

Have you been banned in Google?

Yeah, banned, banned and not banned But, mlyn, where are our missiles hitting the target with such quality video materials, where?

Don't you believe in God either? My neighbor on the site believes in Lucifer, but for some reason he does not believe in God ...

[figwam]

Quote: Observer2014

But, mlyn, where are our missiles hitting the target with such quality video materials, where?

Start in 1996, find out how Dudayev was liquidated.

[Pilat2009]

Quote: figvam

Quote: Observer2014

But, mlyn, where are our missiles hitting the target with such quality video materials, where?

Start in 1996, find out how Dudayev was liquidated.

Well, on a signal from a satellite phone, many missiles can be targeted. But is it weak to use a remotely controlled machine gun via a satellite?

[tikhonov66]

"... but using a remotely controlled machine gun by satellite is weak?
..."
- Dear, you are just NOT IN THE TOPIC ... 8-))
The most widespread data exchange protocol today is the IEEE801.1 type (widely used, for example, as the two bottom layers of the Internet protocol stack) - POFIG - at what distance to control - what is on the next table, even in Jupiter's orbit.
- so if you can "remotely control a machine gun" standing "on the neighboring table" - then there are NO problems - to control it and "by satellite". You don't even need to rewrite the software !!!
...
- Well, about the ADVANCED remote control of Russian weapons - only the lazy has not heard. Here you - and UAVs - such as the "Hunter" type, and MANY robotic tracked platforms ... Google you "to help" ...

- learn MATCH!
8-)))

[Nikon O'Conor]

imagine Observer-the navigator sits 100 meters from the house with the militants and shoots how our calibers hit the target, and shoots with a professional camera on his shoulder so that you have a high-quality everything ... There is a war in the end and not "sterile polygon conditions."
How about critical perception? It’s not destiny to think about it yourself?

[tlauicol]

Quote: Nikon OConor

imagine Observer-the navigator sits 100 meters from the house with the militants and shoots how our calibers hit the target, and shoots with a professional camera on his shoulder so that you have a high-quality everything ... There is a war in the end and not "sterile polygon conditions."
How about critical perception? It’s not destiny to think about it yourself?

Imagine: the drone is hanging and filming. The militants have practically zero air defense. Although ... why imagine when you can include Karabakh. This is war. And the air defense is there

[Nikon O'Conor]

Well, yes, yes ... there is a drone hanging 100 meters above the base and filming the barmaleev. Barmaley wave their hands, smile and wait for the caliber to arrive ...
Was the quality of the drone excellent in Karabakh? Are you even in the subject?

[tlauicol]

Quote: Nikon OConor

well, well, yes ... the drone hangs 100 meters above the base and takes pictures of the barmale

if there is such a problem with the optics, and Avito was banned, then it is understandable why there is tension with vidos

[Nikon O'Conor]

Yes, it's not about drones, and their resolution. Experience full-scale military exercises .. you will understand everything yourself.

[tikhonov66]

"... Imagine: the drone is hanging and filming.
..."
What kind of "drone" ?!
- What for?!!!!
Do you really think that "mattress makers" are and-and-and-diots ?!
8-))
.
Imagine, better, ANOTHER ... - the dude sits at the "photoshop" ... In the warmth, in the cozy ...
- and "glues" photos from the archive:
Grips WITHOUT HURRYING (!) - and from whatever angle that rocket will look MAXIMUM BEAUTIFUL in case of a "precise hit" (sorry, DO NOT HIT - but on FLYING !!!) to that "jeep" - takes a photo of a "jeep", a photograph cruise missile in the right angle - and VOIL !!
- with a dozen mouse clicks, applying the "correct" filters ...
- and DO NOT NEED ANY "drone"
Fast, cheap - ANGRY!
8-)))

- learn the MATCH! ... a literate girl ..

[Maikcg]

So mobile phones were smashed to dust together with the barmaley operators.

[for]

Quote: figvam

Have you been banned in Google?

Do you use Google? Not patriotic!

[gurzuf]

Lenin: "To know the enemy by sight, one must read his literature."

[clerk]

... TATSHO! I didn’t know, I didn’t see it, I didn’t catch the moment. What kind of missiles? Imagine the same video quality as in the article. Weak ?!

Do you mean a photo of the exercise? Perhaps, but why - who needs it and so they know.

[mikh-korsakov]

"TATSHO! I didn’t know, I didn’t see it, I didn’t catch the moment. What kind of missiles? Imagine the same video quality as in the article. Weak ?!"It would be possible to summon the souls of the Chechen field commanders. But very few people know how to do this.

[Konnick]

Our commander-in-chief boasted "such" video to director Oliver Stone, though the video is not about Caliber, and it was filmed from Apache.

[ankir13]

THEY THERE Trump was bombed by the flayers with a rocket at the pillar. The photo is somewhere in the middle of the collage ... Something with scaling is even annoying, the directions are not all aligned ...
Should air collisions from rocket engines or projectiles rushing at high speed be noticeable?

[Paragraph Epitafievich Y.]

Quote: figvam

What else can the most "democratic" country in the world boast about? Yes, only in symbols of "democracy" and militarism.

Stop grumbling. This exhibitionism with the demonstration of militaristic phalluses is in the order of things. We, too, once again love to show off # analogs are not. There is a whole TV channel for this.

[figwam]

Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.

We are one more time too

But we do not impose "democracy" and do not fight for false human rights around the world with missiles, all our weapons are for the defense of our country, and not for aggression against others.

[Paragraph Epitafievich Y.]

Quote: figvam

all our weapons are for the defense of our country, not for aggression against others.

Yes, give up this childish demagoguery. Anything can be explained by "defending one's country" - from three victories over some hicks in Syria to the colonization of the moon.

Quote: figvam

But we do not impose "democracy" or fight for false human rights around the world.

"Human rights" are inherently deceitful. Are we fighting for some kind of "human rights"? At least at home, in Russia? I suppose the establishment of the National Guard is one of the stages of such a "struggle"? Or is our judicial system "human-oriented"?

[figwam]

Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.

Yes, give up this childish demagoguery.

Millions of deaths from fictitious pretexts for invasion and American weapons are not childish demagogy, this is a crime against humanity.

Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.

"Human rights" are inherently deceitful.

Say this every time the West ruins the economy of another independent country.

[Paragraph Epitafievich Y.]

Quote: figvam

Say this every time the West ruins the economy of another independent country.

Yes, I do not care about the "economy of another independent country." The main thing for me is that my country does not become this "country". But it is not the damned Americans who will bring it to the handle, but the local rats. And you are all lamenting about the tramps in some Syria and Venezuela.

[figwam]

Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.

yes, I do not care about the "economy of another independent country"

Well, yes, I don't know anything, my hut is on the edge.

Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.

And you are all lamenting about the tramps in some Syria and Venezuela.

This reminds me of the statement of the German pastor Martin Niemöller, with which he tried to explain the inaction of German intellectuals regarding the Nazis.

When the Nazis seized the Communists, I was silent: I was not a Communist.
When they imprisoned the Social Democrats, I was silent: I was not a Social Democrat.
When they grabbed union members, I was silent: I was not a union member.
When they came for me there was no one to stand up for me.

[Paragraph Epitafievich Y.]

Quote: figvam

Well, yes, I don't know anything, my hut is on the edge.

Have you changed something from your "hut-not-from-the-edge" with your eternal whining and swearing at America? What, saved

Quote: figvam

the economy of another independent country.

?

Quote: figvam

which he tried to explain the inaction of German intellectuals regarding the Nazis.

Well, in our dark times "someone wrote four million denunciations." These were comrades with an active lifestyle. And then they, on the instructions of the TV and the Pravda newspaper, loved Corvalan, Angela Davis, Babrak Karmal, Bokassa, African and Arab beggars, Uncle Ho, etc. And then it was over.

[figwam]

Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.

Have you changed something from your "hut-not-from-the-edge" with your eternal whining and swearing at America? What, saved

And you thought that they write here to save the country?
If I have changed at least one person's opinion about the United States, I think that I am writing for a reason.

[Paragraph Epitafievich Y.]

Quote: figvam

If I have changed at least one person's opinion about the United States, I think that I am writing for a reason.

I hasten to disappoint you)

[tikhonov66]

"... If I have changed at least one person's opinion about the United States, I think that I am writing for a reason.
..."
- Yes sir!
You don't write in vain.

[Thrifty]

Well, firstly, there is nothing "convincing" there, because it is not known from what ranges they hit the targets, and secondly, they are practically all static, and the last two pictures show almost misses, especially the missile that should hit the ship, apparently in movement, waves go on the sides of it. ..

[iouris]

Yeah. Here ours do not boast well.

[Incvizitor]

This is there still

[Observer2014]

Americans have convincingly bragged about the accuracy of their missiles

Yes convincingly. Any objections? Forward. Justify. All in attention.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Observer2014

Yes convincingly. Any objections?

Photoshop is not capable of that.

[Observer2014]

Quote: Piramidon

Quote: Observer2014

Yes convincingly. Any objections?

Photoshop is not capable of that.

Well, "take photos." Weak?

[Piramidon]

Quote: Observer2014

Quote: Piramidon

Quote: Observer2014

Yes convincingly. Any objections?

Photoshop is not capable of that.

Well, "take photos." Weak?

Do you want to promote "weak"? I am not led and do not work on orders.

[Observer2014]

Quote: Piramidon

Quote: Observer2014

Quote: Piramidon

Quote: Observer2014

Yes convincingly. Any objections?

Photoshop is not capable of that.

Well, "take photos." Weak?

Do you want to promote "weak"? I am not led and do not work on orders.

Yes I want to. So where are our high-quality footage of our advanced missile systems hitting? We are tired of launching into cloudy skies; we want to see our advanced missiles hit the target. All!

[Piramidon]

Quote: Observer2014

Yes, I want ... We want ...

Want is not harmful.

We are tired

Have a rest.

[Observer2014]

Quote: Piramidon

Quote: Observer2014

Yes, I want ... We want ...

Want is not harmful.

We are tired

Have a rest.

Well, that's all? I was tired of resting. Two hours was enough for you? Rummaging through the tyrnet and not finding anything at all connected with the hit of Russian advanced missile systems.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Observer2014

Was two hours enough for you to rummage around and find nothing at all connected with the hit of Russian advanced missile systems.

I didn't dig and didn't intend to. Give me my quote, in which I would write something to you or object to the hit of our missiles. You mold your ideas for me. And I'm not the only one who noticed Yankesovsky photoshop here.

[Observer2014]

Quote: Piramidon

Quote: Observer2014

Was two hours enough for you to rummage around and find nothing at all connected with the hit of Russian advanced missile systems.

I didn't dig and didn't intend to. Give me my quote, in which I would write something to you or object to the hit of our missiles. You mold your ideas for me. And I'm not the only one who noticed Yankesovsky photoshop here.

"Proud of birds." What could you see there? The people who printed the article what they could. That and published in the form of photographic material. Publish our hits. If you are not a star-sicker. And then you and people like you, except for any garbage that are not smart, do not give out on the air.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Observer2014

Post our hits, if you're not a starball.

What hangover? Give me one reason why I should fulfill your whims and prove to you something that I have nothing to do with? I wrote to you ONLY about American pictures, and no more. I didn’t tell you anything about our hits and I don’t intend to. Do not jump off the topic of my comment and do not try to cheat me on your notions.

[Observer2014]

Quote: Piramidon

Quote: Observer2014

Post our hits, if you're not a starball.

What hangover? Give me one reason why I should fulfill your whims and prove to you something that I have nothing to do with? I wrote to you ONLY about American pictures, and no more. I didn’t tell you anything about our hits and I don’t intend to. Do not jump off the topic of my comment and do not try to cheat me on your notions.

Otmazyvaeshsya. But that's understandable. That you have nowhere to go. A full paragraph with the publication of evidence of the accuracy of our advanced missile systems. But agree. What would you like to be proud of! And shut up awkward questions with cool videos. But there are no vidos. "Zircon"? Assertive foolishness by you and people like you? If instead of stupid unsubstantiated foolishness, you can insert an iron video argument.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Observer2014

Excuse yourself

Do you keep attributing your erotic fantasies to me? Where is my comment about Photoshop, from which your tantrums began, and where are your complaints about our missile hits? Do you understand the difference? Or are you completely stupid on your ideas.
Py.Sy. Write yours and show me in a personal. No one here is interested in your inventions anymore. I think they are smart - I will answer. But, judging by your wild obstinacy and your own infallibility, it is unlikely. Simplify

[cmax]

Quote: Piramidon

Quote: Observer2014

Yes, I want ... We want ...

Want is not harmful.

We are tired

Have a rest.

And what is wrong the person wrote. I wrote everything correctly. I would like to see the similar accuracy of hitting domestic missiles on the target. If they do, why be ashamed to show. And then the word halva does not become sweeter.

[Piramidon]

Quote: cmax

And what is wrong the person wrote. I wrote everything correctly. I would like to see the similar accuracy of hitting domestic missiles on the target.

The fact is that he wrote to the wrong address. How do I feel about the accuracy of hitting our missiles? In general, I did not say a word about it, but this person began to demand something from me. You open our dialogue from the very beginning, perhaps you will understand.

[Nikon O'Conor]

Мы tired of starts in the cloudy sky.Мы want to

Who are we" ? The flag behind your back shows that you are not US yet

[tikhonov66]

"... Well," take photos. "Weak?
..."
- no problem! 1
8-)) - Hold!
https://news.ru/usa/opleuha-putina-ili-myachik-trampa-amerikancy-plodyat-memy-o-padenii-bajdena/
To view - you can copy the given link (Ctrl C) - and paste it (Ctrl V) - in the "address" field of any browser. On the addressed page - there is a video embedded in the page - which "shows" - Trump knocks down Biden three times as he climbs the plane ladder - with precise golf ball strikes 8-)))
- and, pay attention !!!
1) these are NOT ELEMENTARY-mounted STATIC (!) Photos of "exactly flying up to the targets" of American missiles - as in the "type-proofs" given here - but a mounted VIDEO !!! - with realistic trajectories of balls bouncing off the back of Biden's head !!
2) the original of this edited video (on Twitter) - ALREADY BANKED !!!!
- Here it is - the real "American freedom of speech"! - if someone else doubted ...
80))

[Pilat2009]

Quote: Piramidon

Quote: Observer2014

Yes convincingly. Any objections?

Photoshop is not capable of that.

Tell it to Suleimani

[The leader of the Redskins]

OUR cartoons are the most cartoons! The Americans showed some outdated screenshots. Whether our animation is the future! Possible .... Possibly ours ...

[Incvizitor]

Your last summer drunk at the airport rammed and before that the militias shot down everything

[Fitter65]

Quote: Observer2014

Americans have convincingly bragged about the accuracy of their missiles

Yes convincingly. Any objections? Forward. Justify. All in attention.

One question, if you can answer of course. And how much ammunition was spent in order to shoot one such spectacular shot? Moreover, in polygon conditions.

[loki565]

Such pictures are taken without lifting the fifth point from the chair, photoshop and all that)))
[media = https: //www.youtube.com/watch? v = M92Jj99ADeU]

[mikh-korsakov]

A question from an amateur. And why is the rocket that hits the tank so thin that it was not fed?

[Aag]

Quote: mikh-korsakov

A question from an amateur. And why is the rocket that hits the tank so thin that it was not fed?

It is sharpened! It is for this particular tank))).

[tlauicol]

70mm apkws

Quote: mikh-korsakov

A question from an amateur. And why is the rocket that hits the tank so thin that it was not fed?

[tikhonov66]

"... Why is the rocket that hits the tank so thin that it was not fed?
..."
- This rocket must first GET, and then, more and "Squeeze" into the observation SLOT of the tank!
8-)))
- therefore, it cannot be thicker than the tank's viewing slot ...
g))

[Katanikotael]

Something I did not notice the vaunted accuracy of a salvo of missiles from American ships at bases in Syria, if I am not mistaken, half missed or missed?
It's funny to read about accuracy from the Yankees, who, just a few years ago, could not hit the target with an anti-missile, even with a beacon installed on the target ...

[Reserve buildbat]

Looks especially good: a rocket flying into a tank. Beetle pin just , in second place, the KAB, falling on a motorboat, which is 5 times lighter and 5000 times cheaper than a bomb, and a masterpiece: A cruise missile falling on the head of a dummy.

[Observer2014]

Quote: stock buildbat

Looks especially good: a rocket flying into a tank. Beetle pin just , in second place, the KAB, falling on a motorboat, which is 5 times lighter and 5000 times cheaper than a bomb, and a masterpiece: A cruise missile falling on the head of a dummy.

You would have such a cool economist and my company. You would tell and show everyone how to do it! Come to Sochi! ”Otherwise, if he’s not a new mayor, at least laugh or cry.

[Reserve buildbat]

1. I am not an economist.
2. Don't be rude.
3. Compare the sizes of targets and ammunition.
4. Be quiet, you will pass for the clever.

[clerk]

... such a cool economist and my company. You would tell and show everyone how to do it! Come to Sochi! ”Otherwise, if he’s not a new mayor, at least laugh or cry.

I don't understand your logic - the mayor of Sochi works as an economist at "your" enterprise or what?

[Observer2014]

Quote: clerk

... such a cool economist and my company. You would tell and show everyone how to do it! Come to Sochi! ”Otherwise, if he’s not a new mayor, at least laugh or cry.

I don't understand your logic - the mayor of Sochi works as an economist at "your" enterprise or what?

In fact, yes ..

[Nikon O'Conor]

Well, here it is !!!! Sochi! Also me "militia". Armenian taxi driver? What company - "I'm taking it with the breeze"?

[Fitter65]

Quote: stock buildbat

Looks especially good: a rocket flying into a tank. Beetle pin just , in second place, the KAB, falling on a motorboat, which is 5 times lighter and 5000 times cheaper than a bomb, and a masterpiece: A cruise missile falling on the head of a dummy.

So, in fact, this is a polygon survey. work on predetermined, known and non-opposing targets. therefore, to check the operability of the ammunition, it is not necessary to put an expensive thing, you can do with a penny worthless one.

[Aag]

Quote: stock buildbat

Looks especially good: a rocket flying into a tank. Beetle pin just , in second place, the KAB, falling on a motorboat, which is 5 times lighter and 5000 times cheaper than a bomb, and a masterpiece: A cruise missile falling on the head of a dummy.

The motorboat also immediately cut her eyes ...
The question is not about the ratio of values, it’s a mesh. But how, what was the b / n for? Wake trail in front of the motorboat. Towed the entire horizon for larger purposes. Are not you afraid?

[tikhonov66]

"... The motorboat also immediately cut her eyes ...
..."
- so PofIG - what pictures to glue.
This is not a demonstration of the mythical accuracy of "mattress" ammunition.
- elementary PHOTOSHOP ADVERTISING
8-))

[tlauicol]

3. Compare the sizes of targets and ammunition.
4. Be quiet, you will pass for the clever. [/ Quote]
[quote = Stroibat stock] Looks especially good: a rocket flying into a tank. A pin for a bug is simple: laughing: in second place is a KAB falling on a motorboat, which is 5 times lighter and 5000 times cheaper than a bomb, and a masterpiece: A cruise missile falling on the head of a dummy. : [/ quote]
Will you decide what you don't like: too small a rocket or too big !? In the first case, the Yankees drew attention to the power of a small ammunition, in others to the accuracy of large

[Reserve buildbat]

Look at the photo again and appreciate The SMALL rocket attacks the TANK, and the LARGE one falls on the MAN. Is that clearer?

[tlauicol]

excuse me, but I couldn't find a fatter font ..

[Reserve buildbat]

The ratio of the size of the target and ammunition, you are our incomprehensible.

[tlauicol]

emphasis on accuracy. you decide: a small rocket is bad, a large rocket is also bad ..
guns are also shot at banks and paper more often than at wild boars
ps. this is not a man and not a mannequin

[tikhonov66]

"... emphasis on precision.
..."
- to make a "real accent" - you have to hit with a HUGE ROCKET (well, to make it worse) - but not into a person - but into the SHARP OF a PIN.
- the blessing of photoshop allows ...
8-))

[Klingon]

especially amused by the photo of a rather large and expensive high-precision ammunition hitting a cheap motor boat

[113262a]

13 or 14 photos flew in there, and a man standing there!

[Piramidon]

The man can be seen very expensive. Not less than any minister objectionable to the Yankees.

[Maikcg]

This is Trump, you can.

[Alex_You]

Quote: Klingon

especially amused by the photo of a rather large and expensive high-precision ammunition hitting a cheap motor boat

It was necessary to write off the expensive aircraft carrier and drive it for testing, so what?

[Klingon]

why wouldn’t, one was just written off recently

[voyaka uh]

Small targets are harder to hit. The seeker is more difficult to keep the missile on target.

[Aag]

Quote: voyaka uh

Small targets are harder to hit. The seeker is more difficult to keep the missile on target.

In this shot, I was puzzled by something else - a strip of foaming water in front of the motorboat, (someone's wake?), And the horizon cluttered with other potential targets.

[voyaka uh]

Each such frame is from a complete video. Slow motion is also given in the video
shooting. Not for advertising - for studying flight and missile hit / miss.
Precision missile testing is expensive. Therefore, they monitor from several sides,
plus from the video camera of the seeker of the rocket itself, or add. video cameras on the rocket body.
The accuracy of hits of the generation of missiles with a CEP of 1 m is demonstrated.
We chose single spectacular shots.
For comparison, Calibers and Tomahawks of the first generations of the KVO have 10 m

[Aag]

Quote: voyaka uh

Each such frame is from a complete video. Slow motion is also given in the video
shooting. Not for advertising - for studying flight and missile hit / miss.
Precision missile testing is expensive. Therefore, they monitor from several sides,
plus from the video camera of the seeker of the rocket itself, or add. video cameras on the rocket body.
The accuracy of hits of the generation of missiles with a CEP of 1 m is demonstrated.
We chose single spectacular shots.
For comparison, Calibers and Tomahawks of the first generations of the KVO have 10 m

Thank you for the clarification given for the time!
The question is different: on the frame (with a motorboat) in the test area in direct visibility of ships (?). Is it not dangerous? For observers there are not many? Why is the KAB flying into the motorcycle (?) Boat, and not into the towing vehicle?

[tlauicol]

there is no tugboat, the boat is self-propelled, radio-controlled. just laid the bend.
and they will not get into oil platforms and ships on the horizon - laser guidance, the target is highlighted from an aircraft

[Aag]

Quote: Tlauicol

there is no tugboat, the boat is self-propelled, radio-controlled. just laid the bend.
and they will not get into oil platforms and ships on the horizon - laser guidance, the target is highlighted from an aircraft

Firstly, even considering your previous posts to me, it's true, without any joke ...
Will you be able to spin a small boat in such a way in a large water area to get into your own wake (of such intensity)? In principle, probably. But not at this kind of checks, shooting.
However, they were not convinced by the silhouette-surroundings on the horizon ... Otherwise, it would be worth arguing for the attention of the addressees of the photo / video not on accuracy, but on the selectivity of b / p.
And ... To exclude mutual misunderstanding: I consider myself a patriot.! For me, the question is different: how much the RF is a legal successor, a follower of the USSR. I agree, the question is somewhat provocative (on the other hand, honest, specific) ... You can not answer. ...
From myself: what is happening is not happy ... Positive changes (IMHO), - the passage of time, almost inevitable, I do not see our, Russian merit ...
Yes, I'm used to all-round, regular victories, -USSR ... I am very skeptical about modern reports (for a number of factors) or eyewash, propaganda, forgery -...
From your comment, -from what distance was the target "highlighted"?

[tlauicol]

15 September 2013. Gulf of Mexico. 15 km. Gbu-10 dropped by a B-1 bomber. The boat is radio controlled (how did you determine the turning radius if the photo was taken at sea level?). As for the GBU's capabilities, back in 91, the F15 shot down a Mi24 helicopter with such a thing. In the air
https://i2.wp.com/theaviationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/GBU-10-21.jpg?resize=685%2C488&ssl=1
I don't understand how images are inserted now

[tlauicol]

here in a second hitting this boat. bch inert

[tikhonov66]

Shaw for crap!
- is that - hit by a LARGE ROCKET - IN THE KILVATER TRACK (!) from the motorboat? !!!
80)
Not otherwise, as they decided not to spoil the motorboat ...
- that's what "tight-fisted Yankers" means.
But the motorboat was probably written off ..
eight-)).

[Aag]

Quote: Tlauicol

15 September 2013. Gulf of Mexico. 15 km. Gbu-10 dropped by a B-1 bomber. The boat is radio controlled (how did you determine the turning radius if the photo was taken at sea level?). As for the GBU's capabilities, back in 91, the F15 shot down a Mi24 helicopter with such a thing. In the air
https://i2.wp.com/theaviationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/GBU-10-21.jpg?resize=685%2C488&ssl=1
I don't understand how images are inserted now

Thank..
I do not dispute the seriousness of this, and other presented BP. Once again, the abundance of NK in the area of ​​"shooting" was confused, and the "light", caved water in front of the target (motorboat)!

[tikhonov66]

"... For comparison, the Calibers and Tomahawks of the first generations of the KVO have 10 m
..."
- and the SECOND?
and the THIRD ?!
...
- not otherwise, as "tenths" - already fall "in the point of a pin"
8-))

[tikhonov66]

"... The small target is harder to hit. The seeker is harder to keep the missile on target.
..."
- and photoshop - he DOES.
What is it there; "We drew it - that's all!"
8-))

[letinant]

Images after:

So, to the selection:

6, 16, 18, 20, explicit editing. The shadows do not match, and in general they are clumsy. There is doubt about the first image, the wake jet does not coincide with the missile hit vector and the head of the tomahawk has already entered the container and the beginning of the destruction of the warhead skin is not visible, just as the beginning of the container deformation on the barge is not visible.

[voyaka uh]

Entertain yourself with illusions.
Israel once a week creates such "montages" and "photoshop".
For 25 years, approximately since the time the precision weapon appeared.
Each such rocket or gliding bomb still manages to transmit
video recording of your own hit.
Probably, they haven't seen enough of such videos in Karabakh?
Unbelievers, even though there are tags on their heads, will not be believed

[letinant]

Quote: voyaka uh

Entertain yourself with illusions.
Israel once a week creates such "montages" and "photoshop".
For 25 years, approximately since the time the precision weapon appeared.
Each such rocket or gliding bomb still manages to transmit
video recording of your own hit.
Probably, they haven't seen enough of such videos in Karabakh?
Unbelievers, even though there are tags on their heads, will not be believed

Are you an Israeli or what? And where does Israel have to do with talking about the United States. And in my text for obvious punctures.

[Klingon]

uh huh, israeli
they always have the best

[Aag]

"... Each such missile or gliding bomb still manages to transmit
video recording of your own hit ... "
... from various angles, post this heroic selfie on the network (even before the strike is struck), draw up a report on the damage done.))

[tikhonov66]

"... Each such missile or gliding bomb still manages to transmit
video recording of your own hit.
..."
- that of the "Yankes" is an old tradition.
When they launched their first Rangers to the moon in the 60s - these spacecraft - had a television camera in their head - which constantly transmitted a television image to the ground. Thus - the last frames before "hitting the moon" - the Ranger transmitted to the ground from a distance of 100-200 meters from the moon. Well ... what did he manage ...
8-)
- these are our eccentrics - bother with a "soft landing". And mattresses - money was not counted ... Just to "get".
8-))

[tlauicol]

Google the video of China Lake (polygon) rain of rockets or rocket rain. You will find the whole "photoshop"

[svoit]

Most of the photos are stupidly ripped out of videos that everyone has seen for a long time

how large is the number of precision weapons.

Not all of them have a great number of them, some have few, and many do not.

[El Chuvachino]

I agree, cool. But what about those who did not hit and did not fly?

[rocket757]

This is exactly the "ability to show RIGHT"
By the way, a missile that hits a ship in a superstructure is not the most effective way to hit a sea target! So they try to cut at / below the waterline! There are many more chances to sink!

[tlauicol]

Quote: rocket757

This is exactly the "ability to show RIGHT"
By the way, a missile that hits a ship in a superstructure is not the most effective way to hit a sea target! So they try to cut at / below the waterline! There are many more chances to sink!

a missile that hits the superstructure is the most effective way to save the target. Our plavkazarma tortured for years on the superstructure until they were exponentially drowned (famous video)

and the tugboat Mashuk is hit and hit and will not be smashed, and this is far from a frigate. But there will be a task - they will drown

[sabakina]

Quote: El Chuvachino

I agree, cool. But what about those who did not hit and did not fly?

―Yes? How am I going to arrange them for the museum?
―As exhibits, as exhibits.
―Alive?
―Conditional!
― Forgive me, but then how to write off?
―According to the act, as having fallen into disrepair.

(c) Wizards.

[rocket757]

Show the CORRECT "product by face", they know how.
They are not alone, by the way.
So what?
Criticize your own people, for the fact that we ourselves are far behind in this matter? In advertising, we cannot CORRECTLY show the real achievements that we have .... annoying. We have such a conviction that OURS will always prove IN ACTUAL that it is worthy, effective, everything will be clear anyway.
It's a mistake or not .... I don't know.

[cniza]

Yes, but in life, there is also a second side that defends itself, and with that, like their missiles?

[rocket757]

And they will not show this! Never and never. Well this is against the line ... their party!

[cniza]

Yes, and such a freeze frame can not be removed.

[spech]

At 20 percent stupidly there are no shadows, probably because of stealth?

[cniza]

Apparently devils ...

[Novichek]

Yes, no, not a series, everything is understandable: these are just such rockets, the newest, we have supersonic, their own sound lags behind them, but here it is cooler, these are super-light rockets, their light cannot catch up)) that's why the shadow " will arrive "a little later, somewhere in an hour))

[xorek]

There are no beautiful photos of words, but these are exercises ... And if the Russians turn on their electronic warfare? How would these missiles fly back in a swarm, etc.

[tralflot1832]

For the American people, some photos have been walking around the tyrnet for about ten years. America do not worry, do not pay attention to the fact that when you climb the ladder, the president stumbles twice and falls once. But he has missiles that fall where necessary. This is not for people: In ideal conditions!

[rocket757]

Trump promised super-hard rockets, but America didn't choose him !!? What does it mean? So, they are not so melitarists, they do not want to frighten the world with their super-stubborn weapons?

[113262a]

And where is the photo, when the hegemons DIDN'T GET, OILED? So any, even a notorious astigmat, out of a thousand, at least times will fall!

[boriz]

But in Syria it turned out not so convincingly.

[sergo1914]

In Soviet times, it was strictly forbidden to show. For large pieces, funnels were generally dug under the satellite away from the target. At the same time burying the real one. For small ones. The name "Tochka" was suggested by DF Ustinov just after the demonstration. On tests, everyone is smeared at first. And when they start to hit ... let the adversary think that everything is bad.

[sabakina]

Judging by the trajectory, the rocket will hit the seam on board as much as possible ...

[tlauicol]

It won't help the boat in battle. They will not shoot a blank

[Aag]

Quote: Tlauicol

It won't help the boat in battle. They will not shoot a blank

The videos above in the comments clearly demonstrate the opposite ...

[tlauicol]

What, the boat can withstand a missile hit from a high-explosive warhead? At what minute?

[tlauicol]

Offtopic question: how to attach an image, video on the site now? Some changes in the comments

[Professor]

Quote: sabakina

Judging by the trajectory, the rocket will hit the seam on board as much as possible ...

Not. The missile will explode in close proximity to the target (proximity fuse). So, for example, a missile SAM Carapace srabaryvet at a distance of 9 m from the target. So the furry beast knocks on the deck of the lifeboat.
And the trajectory is not visible in the photo. Single photo only. Maybe the bomb flies with a pitch ...

[tikhonov66]

"... Maybe the bomb flies with a pitch ...
..."
- No, the bomb flies with the pilaster, waving the buttress.
8-)))

[svoit]

Quote: rocket757

There are many more chances to sink!

Depends on the tasks, sometimes you need to deprive controllability, weapons or move (then you can capture and repair)

[rocket757]

Well, yes, the rockets are now so smart, where will they be shown, where will they get?
Not everything is so simple, it is not in vain that a percentage of ... accuracy, efficiency is given for any product.
But anyway. They make high-precision weapons and this is a serious threat to any, their, enemy.

[tikhonov66]

"... it is not in vain that a percentage of ... accuracy is given for any product
..."
- but you can be greedy - and NOT give any percentage ...
eight-))))

[rocket757]

Quote: tikhonov66

- but you can be greedy - and NOT give any percentage ...
eight-))))

And what will it be then?
And so, the terms are different, but the essence is the same ... you can KVO, KVP, percentage of hits and so on. This is already for specialists. The missile hits, the missile doesn't hit ...

[faterdom]

As Libya has shown, even in the fight against an almost unrequited and helpless enemy, precision-guided ammunition runs out unpleasantly quickly.
And what if the enemy is equal, or even superior, and capable of destroying both these ammunition and their carriers at a very respectable range?
No, guys, you need to learn how to shoot from a machine gun, and act with a bayonet, and throw a shovel and a grenade with your hand. And a grimy person in a striped vest can look into the barn to the Bayraktar operator.

[tikhonov66]

"... As Libya has shown, even in the fight against an almost unrequited and helpless enemy, precision-guided ammunition runs out unpleasantly quickly.
..."
- as it became obvious from mature reflection - in the fight against the RIGHT enemy - "high-precision ammunition" is by no means "quickly running out", but SATELLITES and GUIDANCE AND CONTROL CENTERS of "high-precision ammunition" ...
- therefore, quite recently (at the regular exercises of NATA) - the reconnaissance was thrown into the area WITHOUT GPS, but with a compass and a map ...
The result was sad ... They were looking for a long time.
8-))

[evgen1221]

As for the ship's targets, the person here quite logically wrote that such a target should serve for a long time and not sink from one missile (this also imitates the struggle for chewiness). Do not forget that it is also expensive plus impractical one ship-one rocket. And lovers of spectacular destruction, let them go to Hollywood.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Healthy and effective on unprotected sites.

I have this question - if the object is on the ground, then it can be covered with an anti-cumulative net, like the one that is now installed on armored personnel carriers and other US equipment in Afghanistan and on equipment from other countries, how effective will expensive high-precision ammunition be then?

And why have they thought of installing anti-submarine nets long ago, to put anti-cumulative nets on neither equipment nor to protect ground-based objects?

In my opinion, the anti-cumulative mesh is a cheap and effective protection for any object against cruise missiles.

And if all this is still used in conjunction with air defense, then we can, if not nullify, then sharply reduce the US potential in the effectiveness of precision weapons.

[Evil 55]

We also know that mattress toppers are very great specialists in falsification ... especially when it is profitable enough for them.

[cniza]

Most people don't really understand how many precision weapons there are. (...) their accuracy is simply amazing

And they understand that the object will be defended ... oh what am I talking about, they are not at war with such countries ...

[rocket757]

Well, yes, not all ammunition will reach, and the carriers, not all, will be able to survive.

[cniza]

Exaggeration of these topics is becoming too frequent, what is it for?

[Kapkan]

bragged convincingly

Convincing for whom?

[Andrey1966]

"Neptune" in 404 is still the best.

[realist]

not convinced. it looks like everywhere the rocket goes to some source of radio waves, and therefore it flies where it is necessary, but if in conditions of radio interference, yes smoke, but the target does not have a strong background ...
and the Americans also flew to the moon, they planted the descent vehicle there and then took off, they filmed everything and showed us, just not everyone believes ...

[Maikcg]

A nuclear warhead always hits exactly the epicenter.

[Klingon]

Quote: 113262

And where is the photo, when the hegemons DIDN'T GET, OILED? So any, even a notorious astigmat, out of a thousand, at least times will fall!

I have astigmatism. There was a shooting group in the school at the military office. He consistently knocked out 45 out of 50. Even a badge with an identity was given)) there is still something in this

[GoraN]

The target does not give change))

[Kot-54rus]

Very similar))

[Obama Barack]

Are you sure a missile attacking a jeep can cast such a clear shadow on the jeep itself? )))

[Zaurbek]

Cool ... we need to do that too.

[denk20]

Interesting photoshop. :)

[alexan1210]

And we shoot cartoons ...

[123456789]

Quote: voyaka uh

Entertain yourself with illusions.
Israel once a week creates such "montages" and "photoshop".
For 25 years, approximately since the time the precision weapon appeared.
Each such rocket or gliding bomb still manages to transmit
video recording of your own hit.
Probably, they haven't seen enough of such videos in Karabakh?
Unbelievers, even though there are tags on their heads, will not be believed

Such missiles were in the SA back in the 80s of the last century. They cost, however, like a Zhiguli

[screw cutter]

With a radio beacon, any missile will hit the bull's-eye, especially since the Yankees were caught doing this at least once.

[Evgeny Trifonov]

And do all missiles turn off the engine when flying to the target? It is not only the accuracy that is striking, but also the fact that all missiles have their engine turned off when they approach the target.

[stankow]

In the hangar, how can you shoot a running engine? ;)

[Azat Mambetov]

They are somehow not proportional: targets and missiles. It looks like a collage.

[Fisherman]

Mamaev's selection of successful penalties does not make him like Pele in every game.
When moving, countering electronic warfare and without gps / gprs, without a bunch of satellites and drones, possible one-time hits do not play a role. In Syria, tens of CDs and hundreds of other flying "ultra-precise" garbage did not make the weather for the Yankees. It will come down against the Bedouins, but already the Taliban and higher in development are problematic and meaningless.

[Fisherman]

The selection of the polygon "target battle" is not impressive. But the filming of Syrian terrorists like a Russian rocket right into the barrel of a gun, into a rocket launcher and even flies into the OT window during a real battle - inspires!

[svoit]

Quote: MaikCG

A nuclear warhead always hits exactly the epicenter.

But the epicenter does not always coincide with the goal.

[stankow]

A dozen different ammunition. The staff was collected for 20 years. And on tomahawks maybe 30. Tens of thousands of polygon photos. Among them, of course, there are some ...

[hhhhhhh]

The best photos of 20 years have been selected))))

[Maks1995]

There are quite a lot of videos and photos with an accurate hit. And a long time ago. Their PR is right.
I came across youtube several times.

It's just another PR, what to do. There is a lot of other things, some can be dragged here with easy processing ...

[SEWERO-YUG]

At these ovs, astronauts walk on the moon, then in Syria axes fly into the "window", etc., and now they have concocted more cartoons, HZ? - Hollywood nervously smokes on the sidelines!

[Ilya_Nsk]

Well, people are working on it. They have not achieved anything fundamentally unattainable. It can be noted that in all the images there are ideal conditions - noon, warm, no precipitation, no smoke, unclear electronic warfare conditions. And our guided munitions hit pretty well

[Evgeny I.]

This is what the life-giving photoshlp does !!!

[Semyon Nikolaev]

100% photo montage!

[Leonid Har]

Everyone is interested in the question, what will be the accuracy of these ammunition if the GPS system that guides them is suppressed?

[Semyon Nikolaev]

I am sure that all these pictures are banal photomontages! Otherwise, the question arises: who took all these pictures right at the time of the hit ?????

[shaman-25rus]

the key phrase "... on various tests ...". I wonder how you tried to get the pictures?

[Igor Svir]

I DO NOT SEE THE WORK OF CORRECTION ENGINES AND IN GENERAL WORK OF THE MARCH ENGINES - th and ny photojopp