"Did not pose a threat": The US commented on the imitation of the PLA air attack on the American AUG

The Chinese bombers simulating an attack on the American aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt and escort ships posed no threat. This was announced by the Indo-Pacific Command of the US Armed Forces.

The command commented on the military exercises held on January 23, 2021 aviation The PLA, during which Chinese bombers used an American aircraft carrier group located in the Taiwan area as a potential target. Despite the fact that the PLA Air Force Xian H-6 bomber pilots confirmed receiving orders for targets and launching anti-ship missiles at them, the US military did not consider this a threat.

The Theodore Roosevelt Aircraft Carrier Strike Group closely monitored all activities of the Chinese People's Liberation Army and the Chinese Air Force, and at no time did they pose a threat to ships, aircraft or sailors of the US Navy

- said in a statement.

At the same time, Pentagon officials have traditionally accused China of obstructing free navigation in international waters and using the PLA as a "tool of intimidation."

Chinese aircraft and naval forces conducted exercises in the area of ​​Taiwan, which they consider to be their territory. According to the Ministry of Defense of Taiwan, the PLA Air Force combat aircraft on January 23 and 24, 2021, repeatedly entered the island's air defense zone. For two days, 26 Chinese fighters and bombers participating in the maneuvers were near Taiwan.

Comments

[Jacket in stock]

If they posed no threat, how did they discourage?

[Profiler]

"Did not pose a threat": The US commented on the imitation of the PLA air attack on the American AUG

Pentagon officials have traditionally accused China of obstructing free shipping in international waters and using the PLA as a "tool of intimidation".

That is, they still consider the PLA and its aviation as a threat?

And so yes - "did not feel the threat, everyone was in diapers"...

[prior]

On December 7, 1941, before the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Americans were also sure that the Japanese did not pose any threat to them ...

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: prior

On December 7, 1941, before the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Americans were also sure that the Japanese did not pose any threat to them ...

Moreover, the unanswered atomic bombardment of Chinese cities will not "pass" ...

[Naughty]

Quote: ROSS 42

Quote: prior

On December 7, 1941, before the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Americans were also sure that the Japanese did not pose any threat to them ...

Moreover, the unanswered atomic bombardment of Chinese cities will not "pass" ...

100% "Fails" and easily

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Jacket in stock

If they posed no threat, how did they discourage?

Are you, Constantine, trying to find logic in American statements? In vain ...
It is a thankless task to look for a black cat in a dark room. Especially if she's not there ...

[novel66]

it's dangerous to look for a black Doberman in a dark room .... especially if it's there!

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: novel xnumx

it's dangerous to look for a black Doberman in a dark room .... especially if it's there!

[Victor_B]

The Theodore Roosevelt Aircraft Carrier Strike Group closely followed all the activities of the Chinese People's Liberation Army and the PRC Air Force, and at no point in time did they pose a threat to ships, aircraft or sailors of the Navy USA

Well, in peacetime, for sure.
Interestingly, the Chinese with the Yankees have an agreement on the prevention of incidents at sea?
Under such an agreement, it is not allowed to direct weapons and guidance stations at each other, as well as take them for escort.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Victor_B

Under such an agreement, it is not allowed to direct weapons and guidance stations at each other, as well as take them for escort.

And you can read more?
Who is not allowed all this, what types of B and BT are we talking about?
When we with a regiment of Tu-22m2 missile carriers worked out tactical
missile attack with X-22 missiles on AMG, did we violate something?

[Victor_B]

Quote: Bez 310

When we are a regiment of Tu-22m2 missile carriers

Maybe (aviation) you did not fall under the agreement on the prevention of incidents at the SEA?
Or did the radar sights not include?
Ships do not aim weapons in peacetime.
We and the Yankees, I don't know about NATO.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Victor_B

Or did the radar sights not include?

It is impossible to launch the X-22 on ships without turning on the radar.
In short, I realized that you are talking about the Treaty just like that, for
red word, they said.

[Victor_B]

Quote: Bez 310

It is impossible to launch the X-22 on ships without turning on the radar.

"Electronic" start without supplying "high" to the antenna has always been and is.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Victor_B

Electronic start without supplying high to the antenna has always been and is.

Do not disgrace.
The former navigator of the regiment on
missile weapons, combat specialist
the use of X-22 missiles, and it was about launching
CD by ships.

[Victor_B]

The former navigator of the regiment on
missile weapons, combat specialist
the use of X-22 missiles

I'm an air defense shnik.
Ground complexes give high only at the range or on a real target, "give high - shoot".
Once again - apparently aviation does not fall under this agreement.
Probably!
(I don't want to google.)
But about the ships - it's for sure that weapons are not pointed at each other.
But on the plane, as I was told by frame one, "Pennant" firing artillery station (megawatt in impulse, the pilot just feels the kidneys) cut in, so it faded faster than its own squeal. Although it could have been a Japanese fighter.

[Bez 310]

Quote: Victor_B

But here on the plane, as the shot told me

You ... don't ... don't frighten the pilots ...
Stop making people laugh, air defense-shnik.

[Victor_B]

Yes, he almost flew between the masts.
Got it out!
The moped is not mine. I just posted an ad ...
For what I bought ...

[Victor_B]

Quote: Bez 310

You ... don't ... don't frighten the pilots ...

Dear Bez310, could you answer the question - is it true that an entire missile-carrying regiment was exchanged for an aircraft carrier (or the entire AUG)?
Here's a "norm" stuck in my head from somewhere ...

[novel66]

no matter how two ..

[Bez 310]

Quote: Victor_B

Is it true that an entire missile-carrying regiment was exchanged for an aircraft carrier (or the entire AUG)?

Depending on the situation, the composition of the AUG ...
Perhaps more. In general, in the MPA
pure suicide bombers flew.

[Victor_B]

Quote: Bez 310

Depending on the situation, the composition of the AUG ...
Perhaps more. In general, in the MPA
pure suicide bombers flew.

Yeah ...
You guys are courageous!

[Bez 310]

Quote: Victor_B

You guys are courageous!

And then!
About us - here:
https://t.me/moraviaciya

[Lipchanin]

using the PLA as a "tool of intimidation".

Are the AUGs engaged in peacekeeping on all seas and oceans?
How they are tired of their hypocrisy and lack of the slightest respect for other peoples ...

[rotmistr60]

at no point in time did they pose a threat to ships, aircraft or sailors of the US Navy

This was probably said due to the fact that the Americans understood that this was an imitation of a strike, which means that it poses no real threat. And in fact, the Americans, of course, feel a real threat from the PRC, therefore, along with Russia, they added their adversary (enemy) to the list.

[Doccor18]

... and at no point in time did they pose a threat to ships, aircraft or sailors of the US Navy

So T. Roosevelt at no point in time posed a threat to the Chinese pilots ...

[tralflot1832]

I readily believe that the Americans did not stand on their posts! Are they immortals? It's just that the Chinese "falcons" did not receive the order: Drown them all! It seems that the Japanese did not teach them well. Good news in the morning!

[Prisoner]

A good mine when the Americans play badly. All teeth grit. Probably sweating and leaking when the Chinese began to simulate the attack.

[Cowbra]

Of course they did not imagine - the missiles were not allowed And so. they say the AUG changed course and quickly "went towards the sea." In short, "I am strong! But light ..."

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Cowbra

I am strong! But easy

I remembered ...

- You are strong?
- I'm very strong!
- You're strong?
- I'm very brave!
- Are you seasoned?
- I'm very mature!
“You don’t know what“ surrender ”means, do you?
- I don't even know what "hardened" means ...

[Dmitry Makarov]

Tu-16 is handsome, in modern Chinese performance it is generally in the top five, it will tear any NATO bomber even today.
It's not for nothing that we armed the Chinese with our equipment, now Thousands of clones of Russian weapons are keeping Uncle Sam at gunpoint.

[Lara Croft]

Quote: Dmitry Makarov

Tu-16 is handsome, in modern Chinese performance it is generally in the top five, it will tear any NATO bomber even today.

Among the aggressive NATO bloc, only the United States has strategic bombers ...
Indicate pzhl, than the Chinese Tu-16 will tear the American B-52, B-1, B-2 ....
For example, Egypt, Iraq and Indonesia, they did not help in any way ...

modern technology, especially aviation and missile, the Soviet government was ready to supply only friendly regimes, as a result of which the export of the "sixteenth" was limited to deliveries to China, Indonesia, Egypt and Iraq.

https://topwar.ru/92919-tu-16-samolet-epoha-chast-iii-pod-chuzhimi-flagami-v-nebe-lokalnyh-konfliktov.html

The first Chinese machine, built from Soviet parts, took off for the first time at the end of September 1959., and was transferred to the Chinese Air Force early the next year. In China, the aircraft was named H-6 (Hongzhaji-6 - bomber number 6). Starting in 1961, the main production of the H-6 was focused on the newly built Xian aircraft plant.The last modification of the N-6 (and, therefore, the Tu-16) was the N-21K missile carrier created in the 6st century (!). This machine is equipped with economical Russian D-30KP-2 by-pass engines with a thrust of 12500 kg (as we remember, the AM-3 thrust was 9000 kg), which made it possible to increase the altitude and speed characteristics, flight range and payload. The N-6K can carry six Russian-made Kh-55 strategic cruise missiles, equipped with a nuclear warhead and having a range of up to 2500 km. It should be noted that in domestic aviation these missiles are used from our main and most modern carriers: Tu-95MS, Tu-160 and Tu-22M3.

see there ...

No wonder we armed the Chinese with our equipment

A controversial statement ... MTC between the USSR and the PRC was interrupted for many years at one time and resumed only in the era of the decline of the Soviet empire ... after the events of the 89th year, the Western sanctions against the PRC have not disappeared ...
All of the above has borne fruit, 2/3 of the PLA's aircraft fleet is aviation rubbish ....

[iouris]

The serial number 41073 simulated the attack, the remaining 41072 aircraft were on standby.

[Lara Croft]

Quote: iouris

The serial number 41073 simulated the attack, the remaining 41072 aircraft were on standby.

Not at all. According to VIKI: there are 130 of them in the Air Force and 47 in the Chinese Navy, of which missile carriers (H-6K) - 50 units, all in the Air Force.
Chinese Air Force - at least 50 H-6K, 70 H-6H / M and 10 H-6U as of 2016
Chinese Navy - 14 H-6 and 30 H-6G and 3 H-6DU, as of 2016
It can be assumed that the PLA has 50 more or less combat-ready bombers, which pose no threat to the United States, Russia, the South Caucasus and India ....
The CCP guessed something like that, so in the PRC since the 2000s, the development of the H-20 stealth bomber has been going on ...

[Jaromir]

"Did not pose a threat": The US commented on the imitation of the PLA air attack on the American AUG

They did not pose a threat, but they carried out a simulated attack ...