Greek Gazette: Putin made it clear that he considers his latest weapon capable of overcoming US missile defense

Foreign countries are discussing the current situation in the field of global security. And this situation looks alarming, and foreign experts are well aware of this too.

For example, it is indicated that the United States withdrew from the treaty on the elimination of intermediate and shorter-range missiles, from the open skies treaty, previously refused to discuss anti-missile defense issues with Russia and China, and now the strategic offensive arms treaty is hanging by a thread.

The Greek edition Pentapostagma points out that in such a situation Russia had nothing to do but respond - somewhere symmetrically, somewhere asymmetrically. An example is the recent decision of Moscow to refuse to participate in the DON program (treaty on the open skies), which provided for the mutual implementation of flights to control the deployment of troops and weapons.

Greek author:

The very next day after the US withdrew from this treaty, Russia made it clear that it considers this to undermine both the treaty itself and the existing security system.

In an article published by Pentapostagma, they believe that refusals to participate in the treaties "lead the United States and Russia onto the path of a new arms race."

It is indicated how the newest variants began to appear in Russia in recent years weaponsthat are not regulated by any international treaties. We are talking, among other things, about the Avangard hypersonic missile systems, the Poseidon nuclear submarine torpedo, and others.

Greek author:

Vladimir Putin made it clear that he considers his latest weapons capable of overcoming US missile defense. At the same time, Russia itself is trying to protect itself from a possible strike by the latest S-500 Prometheus systems.

It is added that the characteristics of Russian strike (hypersonic) missiles are such that even promising anti-missile defense systems are not capable of intercepting them, and the characteristics of Russian air defense systems make it possible to use these systems, inter alia, as protection against American missile weapons.

The author complains that international treaties are either not respected or not extended. It is noted that North Korea is improving its nuclear weapons, Israel refuses to officially recognize the fact of its involvement in the nuclear club. It is also added that Iran can join the number of owners of nuclear weapons.

All this, according to the Greek edition, adds turbulence, calling into question global security.

Comments

[Cron]

Vladimir Putin made it clear that he considers his latest weapon capable of overcoming US missile defense.

Otherwise, the old will not overcome it. The only question is the number of missiles launched

[iouris]

Quote: Cron

The only question is the number of missiles launched

The question is not only in the availability, but also in the will and readiness to use it (weapon).

[Cowbra]

How many are there? 44 missiles? 2 missiles per warhead - 2 governors will stop, and then, if you're lucky and there are no false targets! And the third will arrange a gypsy with an exit

[credo]

Quote: Cowbra

How many are there? 44 missiles? 2 missiles per warhead - 2 governors will stop, and then, if you're lucky and there are no false targets! And the third will arrange a gypsy with an exit

Do you assert this competently or so, take the "facts" from the ceiling?
Unlike you, the Greeks are very concerned not only with what Russia, the United States and China have or may have, but also with what Israel and North Korea may have. And I understand them perfectly.
After all, no one knows what will happen if someone uses the nuclear argument, intentionally or accidentally, and whose head gets nuclear dust and a cloud, if this "argument" does not hit the target.

[Cowbra]

44 US missile defense missiles in Alaska - data open. No more. The rest of the ICBM, in theory, is not even capable of intercepting. The rate of 2 missiles per 1 target is an alphabet for both air defense and missile defense, just an alphabet, based on statistics.
So what is your question, then?

[credo]

Quote: Cowbra

44 US missile defense missiles in Alaska - data open. No more. The rest of the ICBM, in theory, is not even capable of intercepting. The rate of 2 missiles per 1 target is an alphabet for both air defense and missile defense, just an alphabet, based on statistics.
So what is your question, then?

The question arose about the country of origin of 44 missiles.
But if you were talking about US missiles, then I have doubts about the number of missiles you are referring to. Knowing the natural ability of the Anglo-Saxons to underestimate the quantitative indicator of their weapons and the natural desire of the military to hide the true situation with the inherent characteristics in military products, I doubt the quantitative order of missiles in the United States. By the way, you have not counted the arsenal of the US submarine fleet, but it is intended for the same purposes.
In addition, we should not forget about Britain and France, the owners of nuclear weapons and the US allies in NATO, as well as Germany, on whose territory, according to some sources, US nuclear weapons are also located.
Perhaps there are still helpful fools on the European continent, on the territory of which the United States keeps its nuclear weapons, not excluding the Greeks, so their fears are not in vain.

[businessv]

Quote: credo

By the way, you have not counted the arsenal of the US submarine fleet, but it is intended for the same purposes.
In addition, we should not forget about Britain and France, the owners of nuclear weapons and the US allies in NATO, as well as Germany, on whose territory, according to some sources, US nuclear weapons are also located.

The fact is that your opponent was not talking about nuclear weapons, but about missile defense systems that are theoretically capable of intercepting our ICBMs.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: credo

In addition, we should not forget about Britain and France, the owners of nuclear weapons and the US allies in NATO, as well as Germany, on whose territory, according to some sources, US nuclear weapons are also located.

I do not think that in the event of a real nuclear cut between the United States and the Russian Federation, these countries, even being tied to mattresses by treaty obligations, will strive to proactively "beg" several nuclear charges on their territory. Demonstration of "unity" does not at all mean that it will be unquestioningly fulfilled in practice. There they either run out of battery, or the mice will gnaw the cable, or the duty shift with an attack of diarrhea in the toilet will sit down until it becomes clear on whose side the success is, and only then they will make a decision, either about a blow or about applying on map of the strait to them. JV Stalin in the place where the United States was.

Quote: credo

Perhaps there are still helpful fools on the European continent, on the territory of which the United States keeps its nuclear weapons, not excluding the Greeks, so their fears are not in vain.

Why is it possible? They are there in reality. One thing they need to understand is that "global security" in the world is threatened by only one factor - the global and incurable stupidity and US aggression.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: credo

Do you assert this competently or so, take the "facts" from the ceiling?

It is a well-known fact that the missile defense systems in service with the United States are focused exclusively against single ballistic missiles that do not have MIRVs. An exception is perhaps Aegis and SM-3, but no one tested them for a somewhat massive launch (although EMNIP did intercept one warhead during testing).

[Cowbra]

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

although EMNIP did intercept one warhead during tests

Are you talking about the scandalous tests of the CM-3? When they intercepted a "medium-range ICBM simulator", which under the INF Treaty had long been required to destroy? So it was muddy there that the trajectory was known in advance, most likely, and managed to report that "SM-3 learned to recognize false targets", and the journalist who asked - you yourself said that today there are no false targets it was - they were stupidly kicked out of the press conference)))

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Cowbra

Are you talking about the scandalous tests of the CM-3? When they intercepted the "medium-range ICBM simulator"

No, these are recent tests.

According to the US Missile Defense Agency, a “threat” ICBM was launched from a test site in Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands at a target near Hawaii. Mimicking the Hawaii Defense scenario, USS John Finn, equipped with the Aegis anti-ballistic missile defense system, successfully destroyed ICBMs using the SM-3 IIA interceptor.

What was real there - I don't know, I won't argue.

[YOUR]

That's it. Moreover, the number of missile defense systems and the basing areas are strictly regulated. Some areas may well be able to cover, but mostly not. They simply do not have such a number of interceptor missiles.

[Petr Vladimirovich]

Someone reprints the Greek press, someone comments. Everything is in business ...

[rocket757]

What is there to discuss .... if / when it flies en masse, no one can beat it off.
The question is, will / will not fly ???

[cniza]

We hope the mind wins ... Greetings!

[rocket757]

Welcome
The mind only has to hope !!! Basically WORKS, CONTAINS, STAKH, a sense of self-preservation.
This is a very serious deterrent.

[cniza]

It’s clear, and I’m talking about this, fools are not afraid of anything, because they don’t understand ...

[Mouse]

reason will win

Someday...

[PSih2097]

Quote: rocket757

if / when it flies in large quantities, no one can beat it off.

The option to fight off, that is (strategic air defense with a special charge of a couple of megatons), only now it seems to be no worse than the consequences of nuclear weapons ...

[rocket757]

We have a large country, there are many important objects, all of them cannot be covered ... and even one, the most important object cannot be covered if they purposefully want to destroy it.
The means of attack have always outstripped the means of defense, and this is an objective situation ...
Therefore, everything rests on the fact that the answer will be no less destructive.

[businessv]

Quote: rocket757

Therefore, everything rests on the fact that the answer will be no less destructive.

Yes, in the discussed case with the doctrine of preventive nuclear weapons against minke whales, it remains only to count on the "Dead Hand" - the Perimeter in our opinion.

[rocket757]

A guaranteed retaliatory strike is a prerequisite for deterrence .... who, how, provides such a guarantee, it does not matter, IT IS.

[Mouse]

The question is, will / will not fly ???

The question is, it is necessary, it is not necessary ... is it appropriate?

[rocket757]

For a normal person, it is clear that it is inappropriate!
And sho is going on in the minds of all sorts of fools, ripens ... who knows?

[Mouse]

So ... bad head - darkness ...

[Alien From]

Mattresses need resources, not a scorched radioactive desert!

[Mouse]

And who is talking about the radioactive wasteland?
Local wars ... fix things ...

[Masha]

Let's add digital war to this ...
Well, to rule the world ...

[rocket757]

Any theories can be put forward, but ... the reality is that many have to fear inadequate actions of neighbors, enemies.

[rocket757]

You might think that someone else needs a messy dump. But this is about the normal, we can say that fears are inadequate ...

[parkello]

it is, they write, and all because some Greeks believed that the US Sixth Fleet became capable of intercepting ICBMs with its SM3 interceptor missiles, until they were persuaded by other Greeks, who understood better than them what the SM3 interceptor missile was . I closely follow the ha press. nothing bad about Russia the Greeks do not write, only what they were able to digest and serve others for development. we have few people who are well versed in these matters, the military do not like to discuss anything on the street. only in a closed society, by the way, the Pentapostagma is not the only publication dealing with these topics.

[bar]

Vladimir Putin made it clear that he considers his latest weapons capable of overcoming US missile defense

What do you mean "made it clear"? Are they very tight with the "concept"? He has already spoken about it in plain text many times.

[Malyuta]

Quote: bar

He has already spoken about this in plain text many times.

And even showed cartoons

[Sergey39]

International treaties are outdated and the Greeks should not cry about withdrawal from them, but demand the conclusion of new ones, adapted to the modern situation. In the meantime, we have to update our weapons under the hype.

[cniza]

It is noted that North Korea is improving its nuclear weapons, Israel refuses to officially recognize the fact of its involvement in the nuclear club. It is also added that Iran can join the number of owners of nuclear weapons.

Yeah, and Turkey is striving there ...

[rocket757]

The Sultan wants to create his empire ... this is understandable and ... not happy.

[cniza]

Not happy about it, to put it mildly, in such hands, such a weapon - you can't give ...

[rocket757]

How to limit them now .... technology is no longer a great secret, the price of the issue is very high and it pleases. Only the very, very rich can seriously arm themselves ...

[cniza]

Yes, technology is no longer a secret, the question is only about carriers and where to get the money ...

[rocket757]

Well yes, the question is very big money.
Although trained scientific, technological, industrial personnel, equipment, money alone will not do.

[cniza]

The school has been developed for decades, but buy it? where's the money? and who will sell?

[rocket757]

Well, yes, fast, cheap will NOT work!

[businessv]

Quote: rocket757

technology is no longer a great secret, the price of the issue is very high and it pleases.

Basically, it’s not even about technologies or even about carriers, but about highly enriched uranium and its amount.

[rocket757]

In general, you need to have a whole branch of industry, energy ... an operating reactor! And this is also the supervision of the IAEA and others on the watch. In general, the matter is not simple, costly, it is problematic to implement without help.

[Roman070280]

Vladimir Putin made it clear that he considers his latest weapon capable of overcoming US missile defense.

This is the same Putin who made it clear that he considered able to overcome the US sanctions against SP-2 ??
Bring a new one .. from this already stinks ..

[Petr Vladimirovich]

From Lviv, of course, you know better ...

[Roman070280]

You, of course, know better where you are from ..))

[Oleg Monarchist]

Young man, if sitting at the keyboard you have something and somewhere stinks, then go wash, most likely it stinks either from you, or from your household, or from colleagues

P. S check, Putin accidentally in harem pants you don’t give a shit .. l?

[Roman070280]

Joke - fire .. keep like ..))

[Roman070280]

Putin accidentally in harem pants you do not give a shit .. l?

I take your word for it that he can do that too ..))

Shl .. all over the world people have pants, and only you have harem pants like you ..))

[helloween]

without real shooting in conditions of maximum enemy opposition, it is generally impossible to find out the exact capabilities of the weapon, 99% of targets are shot down on our range, and in a combat situation the results are not at all rosy! Karabakh and Syria showed it

[bk316]

I don't understand, even taking into account the most bravura statements of the Pentagon, it is obvious that they will not intercept,
where do politicians in the west come from who think they will intercept?
Or do they think that we will launch one rocket a month?
Or are they hoping to shoot down ICBMs with sanctions?

[zenion]

Who else has read the Greek newspaper raise your hands above the keyboard.

[yuriy55]

Greek Gazette: Putin made it clear that he considers his latest weapon capable of overcoming US missile defense

There in Greece, where there is everything, by chance they do not know what Russia has in terms of overcoming economic sanctions and influencing US policy towards the Russian Federation - the economic policy of "sitting with full pants" from the State Department?

[fif21]

And Putin didn’t make it clear to Greece that after the pirate seizure and the chase of the Russian vessel, Russia would support the Sultan in his territorial claims to Greece? And we will figure it out with partners ourselves, analyze your actions.

[Lord of the Sith]

Vladimir Putin made it clear that he considers his latest weapon capable of overcoming US missile defense.

And what, the Yankees have sane missile defense systems?)))

[APASUS]

The Greek press has practically admitted that the EU is an empty place, and even the most important ally does not respect its interests!
Sadness!

[kursovik]

And there is something to answer and attack too .. Our history has taught us a lot. So the Greeks are right!

[Gennady Fomkin]

Opinion of some kind of icteric rag Not later than yesterday, this edition squealed: Turkey says that Russia has supplied defective S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems, and the detected malfunctions cannot be eliminated. For six months, Turkish specialists tried to solve the problem, but to no avail. This is considered the main reason that Turkey is not able to take the complexes into service. “The Turkish Foreign Ministry confirmed that the S-400 air defense systems purchased from Russia have not yet been put into operation. But informed sources report a technical problem identified by Turkish military experts. It has not been possible to solve it for about six months now. Air defense, in addition, the adaptation of the new S-400 electronic systems was not approved. Later, it became clear that Turkish specialists did not have the necessary knowledge and experience to independently bring Russian systems into combat readiness. Now it is impossible to do anything without the participation of the Russian Federation. But Ankara and its NATO partners fear that the Russians will make “special” changes to the air defense system settings, which, in turn, will damage NATO's defenses, ” .

[IRS]

In Greece, apparently, they are not aware that the media chronicle from the 2000s to the present day recorded the appearance of eight different "Putin")).
It’s interesting when one of them makes it clear how in this article, everyone else also agrees with him, or they’re far from everything as well and smoothly as they think in Greece)).

[Prisoner]

You might think that this requires the latest weapons. How nevertheless the Greek degraded during the period from Socrates to the present day.

[Jaromir]

refusals to participate in the treaties "put the United States and Russia on the path of a new arms race."

The arms race has been going on for a long time. You could say it never ended.

[Jaromir]

The author complains that international treaties are either not respected or not extended.

So the United States scored on international law. So there is nothing to complain about, we must think about how to return to the implementation and observance of international treaties.

[Jaromir]

questioning global security.

There has been no global security since the collapse of the USSR. The whole world is on the brink of an abyss.

[Alexfu]

The US armed forces are sharpened for attacks, but not for defense, so their air defense works only against the Papuans. Although there is a fairly powerful electronic warfare system.

[Old26]

Quote: Cowbra

Are you talking about the scandalous tests of the CM-3? When they intercepted a "medium-range ICBM simulator," which under the INF Treaty they were obliged to destroy long ago?

Read the INF Treaty. There it is written in black and white that it is allowed to have accelerating means (target missiles) of this class if they are used for testing missile defense systems. So they didn't have to destroy anything. But we, with the filing of MSG and others, destroyed everything, although we could have had the same "target missiles" ...

[Old26]

Quote: YOUR

Moreover, the number of missile defense systems and the basing areas are strictly regulated.

No longer, namesake! Under the 1972 ABM Treaty, 2 areas for basing interceptor missiles and the number of missile defense radars were determined. The location of the early warning radar was also determined. According to the 1974 protocol, the number of districts was reduced to one. Now, after the US withdrawn from the ABM Treaty, all these provisions have been "nullified". This is clearly visible at least from the location of the early warning missile radars in our country and from the positional areas of their interceptors ...