Military Review

US intends to prevent American technology from getting to Russian and Chinese military

88
US intends to prevent American technology from getting to Russian and Chinese military

The US intends to prevent the penetration of American technology by the Russian and Chinese military. This is stated in a statement by the US Department of Commerce.


According to the document, the Bureau of Industry and Security of the US Department of Commerce is introducing new control over any American technologies and actions of persons in order to prevent these technologies from getting to "end users" associated with the military intelligence services of Russia, China, as well as "terrorism-supporting countries" under which in Washington they understand Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, Syria and North Korea.

The same document strengthens control over technologies that can be used to create weapons mass destruction and means of its delivery. Restrictions are imposed on components of chemical and biological weapons, missile systems, and drones. The document comes into force on Saturday, January 16, 2021.

We cannot allow foreign military intelligence services of our adversaries, China, Cuba, Russia, Venezuela, Iran and other terrorism-supporting countries, to use American technology or services to support their destabilizing activities.

- said the US Secretary of Labor Wilbur Ross.

The document specifies the organizations covered by the new document. These included the Main Directorate of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces (GRU), the PRC's military intelligence and counterintelligence services, the intelligence bureau under the PRC General Staff, the intelligence organization of the Iranian IRGC, Iranian intelligence "Artesh", intelligence services of North Korea, Syria and Venezuela.

In Russia, they reacted to the restrictions imposed by the United States, stating that they would not in any way affect the work of the Russian Ministry of Defense and the country's intelligence services, since these departments do not use American technologies in their activities.
88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 501Legion
    501Legion 14 January 2021 19: 38
    +16
    Terrorism is just a mattress and supports. Striped
    1. Cool but not Igor
      Cool but not Igor 14 January 2021 20: 31
      -25%
      Well, yes, of course))) Russia does not use US technologies, only for example, it buys processors from abroad that get there from the USA. How can we narrow the technology gap differently? Even in the USSR they resorted to stealing critical technologies from the West. If the United States does not blunt and cut off China, leaving them the role of a world factory from their technologies, then having financial and technological leverage they will be able to bring the whole world to its knees, but in my opinion, today they are no longer capable of this and China will snatch leadership
      1. XXXIII
        XXXIII 15 January 2021 00: 21
        +2
        We cannot allow foreign military intelligence services of our adversaries, China, Cuba, Russia, Venezuela, Iran and other terrorism-supporting countries, to use American technology or services to support their destabilizing activities.
        They whine so loudly, they themselves are scattered with technologies. How many have already poured into these wars on the loss of secret weapons. Like Jewelins, UAVs and all sorts of little things, but they don't have anything sensible anymore, so for advertising and cartoons. Now the Russian Federation has the very technologies that the United States would gladly receive, for example, S-400, Su-57, Armata, Boomerang, Kurganets, S-500, Poseidon, etc.)) So let them burrow, it will be easier. Although this is a trick, here they, on the contrary, open up to the fullest, in order to catch at least a fry in their nets.
      2. businessv
        businessv 16 January 2021 13: 00
        0
        Quote: Cool but not Igor
        Russia does not use US technologies, only, for example, it buys processors from abroad that get there just from the US.
        Where do you get this from, dear ?! For a long time already 80% of electronics are produced in Asia, in view of the cheapness of labor! The Americans themselves also removed such enterprises from their jurisdiction, using their resources as investments in one or another country, for example, in Malaysia, Taiwan, Hong Kong, etc. to get more profits and avoid taxes. Only our silver carps were unable to use their capabilities to obtain these technologies, all the money is still being withdrawn over the hill!
    2. businessv
      businessv 16 January 2021 12: 54
      +1
      Quote: 501Legion
      Terrorism is just a mattress and supports. Striped
      The first thing that came to mind was the need to declare the minke whales a terrorist state, which would be close to the truth, judging by their actions in relation to the countries they dislike!
  2. bad
    bad 14 January 2021 19: 41
    +22
    The Bureau of Industry and Security of the US Department of Commerce is introducing new control over any American technologies and actions of persons in order to prevent these technologies from reaching the "end users" associated with Russia's military intelligence ...

    I remembered that our Rosoboronexport once gladly sold several Kh-31 missiles in target modification to the United States.
    Let's hope that now and henceforth, such rash steps will not be taken.
    1. XXXIII
      XXXIII 15 January 2021 00: 24
      +1
      Quote: malo
      I remembered that our Rosoboronexport once gladly sold several Kh-31 missiles in target modification to the United States.
      Let's hope that now and henceforth, such rash steps will not be taken.

      In the course of the case, sanctions were made against the military-industrial complex, for the fact that the training X-31 hit their systems, targets, and more than once. laughing
      1. 3danimal
        3danimal 15 January 2021 04: 45
        +1
        Maybe at first. The fact is, now they have learned how to shoot down such targets in exercises. But we use only the simplest targets (it's easier to report this way). How does this affect training levels?
    2. 3danimal
      3danimal 15 January 2021 04: 43
      0
      For Rosoboronexport, this was a useful infusion of $, against the backdrop of scarce budget funding.
  3. 2 Level Advisor
    2 Level Advisor 14 January 2021 19: 42
    +11
    and how long have they not wanted to give technology to competitors? years 80? news?
    1. bad
      bad 14 January 2021 19: 45
      +15
      Quote: Level 2 Advisor
      and how long have they not wanted to give technology to competitors?

      Once they exported technologies to China, which created a competitor for themselves.
  4. rruvim
    rruvim 14 January 2021 19: 43
    +11
    Does the US have new technologies?
    1. Cowbra
      Cowbra 14 January 2021 19: 50
      +2
      Pictures are drawn using new technologies. For example, pictures with shooting Zamvolt - in real life. however, it did not work out to shoot
      1. pytar
        pytar 15 January 2021 14: 05
        +1
        For example, pictures with a shooting Zamvolt - in real life. however, it didn't work out to shoot

    2. pytar
      pytar 14 January 2021 20: 18
      +4
      Does the US have new technologies?

      Actually ... by writing this line, you used several American technologies. laughing
      1. rruvim
        rruvim 14 January 2021 20: 32
        +3
        Not true! Yes, I used American technology to type this text. But are they new?
        1. pytar
          pytar 14 January 2021 21: 29
          +2
          But are they new?

          Relatively new, because coding standards are updated periodically. But I was actually joking here. laughing In fact, if you are interested in technology, you wouldn't ask such a weird question at all. The United States is a technological leader in the world, at an impressive distance from others.
          1. rruvim
            rruvim 14 January 2021 21: 47
            +5
            Very controversial. As a self-sufficient country, then yes! But there are technologies and there are technologies. In terms of the technology of childbearing, the United States is not in the first place, in terms of composites and fusion, it is not in the first place, in terms of the automotive industry - not in the first place, in aircraft construction not in the first place. In terms of conveying universal and tolerant values ​​to humanity, it is also not the first, Europe is the first! Yes! I absolutely agree that on the road between Stalingrad and Astrakhan, I will not find more than one outlet in the steppe to charge my phone. And in the desert, in Nevada, they stick out on the sidelines. But this is not a question of technology, but of infrastructure. I know in Russia small enterprises (without government support) that make carbon and graphene (my son works at one of them), better than similar ones in the USA (with government support), because the technology is better.
            1. pytar
              pytar 15 January 2021 00: 15
              -4
              In terms of childbearing technology, the United States is not in the first place

              In the sense of? What do you mean?
              in terms of composites and fusion, not the first

              In any case, not behind the Russian Federation. And as if they are putting a lot of effort into thermonuclear and probably the first will get the result! And about composites, they made fun ... laughing
              in terms of the automotive industry - not the first

              Probably you live on another planet! belay Are you in general about technology or the number of stampings? belay At one time, Ford turned the world of automotive engineering, Shas was done by Elon Musk. Have you heard anything about them? Maybe Lada Priora is the pinnacle of technology, right?
              in aircraft construction is not the first.

              Excuse me, but after reading the text, I remembered one cult replica of an American film ... "this is the craziest chanting I've ever listened to"! belay
              In terms of conveying universal and tolerant values ​​to humanity, it is also not the first, Europe is the first!

              You have still convinced me that the US has PPC about technologies, and then switched to OTC! mall what
              I absolutely agree that on the road between Stalingrad and Astrakhan, I will not find more than one outlet in the steppe to charge my phone. And in the desert, in Nevada, they stick out on the sidelines. But this is not a question of technology, but of infrastructure.

              Do you seriously think that infrastructure and technology are completely different things? And what, the one who cannot create a normal infrastructure is smarter than the one who creates it, together with the appropriate technologies?
              I know in Russia small enterprises (without government support) that make carbon and graphene (my son works at one of them), better than similar ones in the USA (with government support), because the technology is better.

              You made me happy! fellow I'm not kidding! At least one thing, better than the USA! Given the current level of the management elite, this is a truly great achievement! By the way, I am aware of Russian graphene ... I have been doing business with your companies for many years. hi
              Dear Roman, I wish you personally, good health and that everything you write about becomes a reality! Russian are our brothers and I am sad to look at Russia in its current state. I know that the Russian people are infinitely talented! Everyone can, they can handle everything! Not soon, but no doubt! good
              1. ghby
                ghby 15 January 2021 07: 21
                +2
                Quote: pytar
                At one time, Ford turned the world of automotive engineering, Shas was done by Elon Musk.

                Don't compare Ford to Musk, one made a revolution, the second is a purely niche product based on existing technologies.
                1. pytar
                  pytar 15 January 2021 09: 50
                  -1
                  Don't compare Ford to Musk, one made a revolution, the second is a purely niche product based on existing technologies.

                  I am not comparing them. I say that they are wallpapers, brilliant, talented people!
          2. Dread
            Dread 14 January 2021 21: 57
            -1
            Quote: pytar
            The United States is a technological leader in the world, at an impressive distance from others.

            Then answer a simple question: "-" "Why, why, your suveren, cannot manufacture air defense systems superior to the S-400, S-500, Buk-M3, etc.? Therefore, everything that you wrote does not correspond to reality ...
            The United States does not have enough "brains" (human).
            1. tihonmarine
              tihonmarine 14 January 2021 22: 08
              +4
              Quote: Dread
              Why why, your suveren, cannot manufacture air defense systems superior to the S-400, S-500, Buk-M3, etc.?

              And he buys Israeli air defense.
              1. Avior
                Avior 14 January 2021 22: 54
                -3
                And he buys Israeli air defense.

                American made smile
            2. voyaka uh
              voyaka uh 14 January 2021 23: 25
              +1
              "S-400, S-500" ///
              ----
              There are analogues.
              SM-6, SM-3. And they're on the Aegis network system.
              Patriot is an analogue of the S-300 and Buk.
              There are no analogues, perhaps, on Thor and Shell.
              1. OgnennyiKotik
                OgnennyiKotik 14 January 2021 23: 42
                0
                Quote: voyaka uh
                There are no analogues, perhaps, on Thor and Shell.

                MIM-23 Hawk and derivatives, NASAMS, SLAMRAAM
            3. pytar
              pytar 15 January 2021 00: 27
              -4
              Then answer a simple question: "-" "Why, why, your suveren, cannot manufacture air defense systems superior to the S-400, S-500, Buk-M3, etc.? Therefore, everything that you wrote does not correspond to reality ...

              In response, I will ask an even simpler question: "What, what facts, is your hardening based on?" So that I believe "in accordance with reality"!
              The United States does not have enough "brains" (human).

              Lack of "brains" has always been and is the main problem! They just rarely appear in nature! Therefore, those who have a little more brains try to attract "brains" from all over the world! So another question: Do you know how many of these work in the United States and, accordingly, in Russia? How many American "brains" have found use in Russia and how many Russians are in the United States?
              1. ghby
                ghby 15 January 2021 07: 26
                0
                Quote: pytar
                How many American "brains" are used in Russia and how many Russians are in the United States?

                What brains? Where from? Look who is engaged in high-tech areas in the US, Native Americans? Oh well. Their level of fundamental education in physics and mathematics in schools is weak. Americans are bankers, lawyers and managers - this is their national treasure, everything else is on the sidelines.
                1. pytar
                  pytar 15 January 2021 09: 49
                  -1
                  Look who is engaged in high-tech areas in the US, Native Americans?

                  You are confusing something! Native Americans look like this:

                  They couldn't even think of a wheel! wassat
                  But those who came, invented and created a lot of things! The topic for a whole article, a very long one, by the way ...
                  1. ghby
                    ghby 15 January 2021 11: 50
                    +1
                    Quote: pytar
                    You are confusing something! Native Americans look like this:

                    We are discussing realities, not the past, and your photo has nothing to do with the indigenous population of the United States.
                    1. pytar
                      pytar 15 January 2021 13: 13
                      0
                      .... and your photo has nothing to do with the indigenous population of the United States.

                      Indigenous peoples of the United States - various Indian tribesin the United States, as well as the Eskimos, Aleuts and Hawaiians.


                      We are discussing realities, not the past ...

                      Good! good Let's take a look at the reality then! yes

                      In terms of patents for inventions and the number of inhabitants, China is ahead of Russia by 5,5 times, and the United States by 10 times! This is on the topic of Zadornov "Americans are stupid"and "the Chinese can't think of anything, they just copy"...
                      1. ghby
                        ghby 16 January 2021 20: 24
                        0
                        Quote: pytar
                        In terms of patents for inventions and the number of inhabitants, China is ahead of Russia by 5,5 times, and the United States by 10 times! This is on Zadornov's theme "Americans are stupid", and "the Chinese can't think of anything, they just copy" ...

                        this is on the topic - the Americans are lawyers ... everything is patented there.
                      2. pytar
                        pytar 16 January 2021 23: 36
                        0
                        this is on the topic - the Americans are lawyers ... everything is patented there.

                        We suggest that you familiarize yourself with some of the most ridiculous Russian patents:
                        https://sfw.so/1148929330-samye-glupye-patenty-ch2.html
                        https://zuykov.com/ru/about/articles/2016/12/27/samye-nelepye-patenty-na-izobreteniya-v-rossii/
  5. Cosm22
    Cosm22 14 January 2021 20: 58
    -11%
    I will greatly surprise you, but it turns out there is.
    In the space industry.
    In shipbuilding.
    In engine building.
    In the aviation industry. And not only for military purposes.
    In the automotive industry. The cargo and passenger sector.
    In the production of household appliances.
    The priority in IT technologies is firmly held behind them.
    Of all of the above, what can Russia boast of?
    Oh yes ... We drive hydrocarbon raw materials to the West. Plus cereals. Presumably, with new technologies?
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 14 January 2021 21: 13
      +7
      And I'm not saying that America, having gathered the best minds of humanity (of different nationalities), according to the principle of its formation, was not a locomotive of technical progress. And Germany during the Third Reich, being mono-national, generally broke forward in the technological aspect. I'm talking about America today, 21 of the 21st century. And I don't believe in new technological advances. China is clearly ahead.
      1. Cosm22
        Cosm22 14 January 2021 23: 28
        -9
        Those. America in the 21st century has nothing to brag about?
        It was she who made only 17 space launches last year, not 44?
        And did it on old media, originally from the beginning of the second half of the last century?
        Is it not America that has already mastered the propulsive landing of the first stage of the launch vehicle? And the heavyweight was not created there? And the methane engine was not created there? And the newest cargo and manned spacecraft were created not there? And is it where the latest technology projects Starlink and Starship are successfully developing?
        Poor America ... what has come ...
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 14 January 2021 22: 14
      +2
      Quote: Cosm22
      I will greatly surprise you, but it turns out there is.

      Yes, we all know that technologies and the United States are one of the most advanced in the world, but we must not forget how they got them, at least the same space industry, taken from Germany. Well, ours did their best, Sikorsky also did a lot for the states. And who created nuclear weapons for the United States.
      1. Cosm22
        Cosm22 14 January 2021 23: 15
        -10%
        Let’s not mention Germany as the progenitor of real space technologies, with the Russian ones in mind. OK? For the royal P-1 is very much like the FAU-2. To say the least. And we will not mention Tyura-there on the Orenburg-Tashkent line. And let's not remember how we got our hands on nuclear weapons of the USSR. And, mentioning Sikorsky, we will not recall the one with whose mind and intellect practically the entire production base of Soviet industry was created for Comrade Stalin.
    3. El Chuvachino
      El Chuvachino 15 January 2021 00: 11
      +3
      Why were they shyly silent about nuclear power? About shipbuilding technologies for the icebreaker fleet? About leading positions in the export of telecommunications and related services? The chemical industry and metallurgy are also not huhry muhry.
      1. Cosm22
        Cosm22 15 January 2021 01: 19
        -4
        Is this a pebble in my garden?
        What's wrong with nuclear power in the United States?
        Even the Russian Vicki considers the United States to be the world leader in terms of installed capacity, despite the fact that nuclear power accounts for only 20% of the total energy balance of this country. Russia, for example, is far from American indicators.
        And why do you need an icebreaker fleet in the warm waters of Florida? Or is it needed in Alaska? So there is a piece of uninhabited sushi the size, sorry, with gulkin horseradish. Icebreakers are not needed there. They are not needed there, and at another point the United States is also not needed. And take it easy. It will be necessary - they will build. It's no more difficult than building nuclear-powered aircraft carriers.
        What kind of telecommunications did Russia fill the whole world with? Announce the entire list, pzh-hundred.
        As for metallurgy, there is no reason for joy here either. This type of export is from a series of sales abroad for hydrocarbons and wheat. Selling a rental is one thing. You don't need much intelligence here. Selling competitive mechanical engineering products from it is completely different. Bragging about the status of a resource-based power is hardly appropriate today.
    4. pytar
      pytar 15 January 2021 00: 32
      -4
      I will greatly surprise you, but it turns out there is.

      Dear Vladimir hi , well, don't be so sharp! And all at once! stop A person's psyche can break! Take care of people, we are all 55-60% water-based! laughing I wish you a good mood! good Be healthy! drinks
  6. eklmn
    eklmn 14 January 2021 21: 45
    -3
    "Does the US have new technologies?"
    There is little...!
    "The US Army has developed a device that can turn water from a battlefield ditch into intravenous fluid."
    https://news.yahoo.com/army-pursuing-device-turn-battlefield-153043111.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=ma
    "The four of Boston Dynamics robots danced on New Year's Eve"
    https://www.bbc.com/russian/media-55488913
    "The US Air Force is creating a spacecraft that will transmit solar energy to Earth"
    “Tiny nuclear reactors produce huge amounts of pure hydrogen”
    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tiny-nuclear-reactors-yield-huge-200900607.html
    "Aerion supersonic passenger jet start-up has just begun construction of a new $ 300 million plant in Florida and plans to launch its first aircraft in 5 years."

    And so forth ...
    Little things, of course ...
  7. Cutter
    Cutter 14 January 2021 23: 03
    0
    our opponents, China, Cuba, Russia, Venezuela, Iran and other countries supporting terrorism

    The "masks" have been dropped! Opponents for them are designated, especially "SUPPORTING TERRORISM!" Let the Democrats "sniff" under their tail ....
  8. Prisoner
    Prisoner 14 January 2021 23: 31
    0
    winked It seems to them that there is. hi
  • Crowe
    Crowe 14 January 2021 19: 46
    +15
    We cannot allow the foreign military intelligence of our adversaries, China, Cuba, Russia, Venezuela, Iran and other terrorism-supporting countries

    This is called from a sore head to a healthy one: whose cow would bellow, and the American one would be silent about supporting terrorism.
  • Polymer
    Polymer 14 January 2021 19: 46
    +3
    American "democracy" wrote a testament - so this law should be understood?
  • Plate
    Plate 14 January 2021 19: 50
    +2
    The US intends to prevent the penetration of American technology by the Russian and Chinese military.

    Okay.
  • rruvim
    rruvim 14 January 2021 19: 53
    +11
    It seems to me that the task now is to prevent Russian, Chinese and Indian technologies from reaching the United States. And not vice versa.
    1. Cosm22
      Cosm22 14 January 2021 20: 40
      -5
      Especially the latest Russian technologies in the space sector.
      We will modestly keep silent about Indian and Chinese.
      1. rruvim
        rruvim 14 January 2021 20: 47
        +3
        The humor is clear. But the question is about technology, not the result in the hardware.
        1. Cosm22
          Cosm22 14 January 2021 21: 04
          -11%
          It is the advanced technologies that are ultimately embodied in a successful piece of hardware.
          Therefore, it is hardly worth fearing that the secrets of even Russia of the unnecessary Angara or of the royal "seven", proudly called today the Unions of various modifications, will end up in the United States.
          1. rruvim
            rruvim 14 January 2021 22: 17
            +5
            That you are only hooked on Space. But if we are for Space, then the toilet at UNITI is made according to our technology. Many technologies are common! Inches have long been converted to metric and vice versa. Everything in common! There are only CRITICAL technologies that no one really wants to share. And there are not so many of these "players" on Earth. And the USA is not in the first place. The task of the United States is to lure eggheads from all parts of the world, so that the United States is an advanced technological power. While their cutting edge technology is commonplace emission.
      2. OgnennyiKotik
        OgnennyiKotik 14 January 2021 20: 57
        -3
        Especially these:

        The fourteenth New Shepard mission was successful!

        This was the first mission for this capsule rocket pair. The accelerator landed safely on the landing pad, and the passenger capsule overcame the Karman line, reaching an altitude of almost 107 kilometers, after which it landed relatively softly using a system of three parachutes. It is in this capsule that Blue Origin will send its first suborbital tourists into space.
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 14 January 2021 22: 19
          +1
          Quote: OgnennyiKotik
          It is in this capsule that Blue Origin will send its first suborbital tourists into space.

          Yes, let them fly, to their health.
    2. eklmn
      eklmn 14 January 2021 21: 57
      -8
      “It seems to me that the task now is to prevent Russian, Chinese and Indian technologies from reaching the United States. And not vice versa"
      - If Russian ones come in, the size of US microsatellites will increase several times, or laser 50kW installations will not fit in a jeep (they will have to be transported on a 7-axle platform);
      - if Chinese, then everything will break down in a day;
      - if Indian, then it's hard to say what they have ... you know better ...

      In short, the use of Russian and Chinese technologies will lead to the collapse of the American industry and the US economy. If you achieve this, then don't hinder ...!
      1. rruvim
        rruvim 14 January 2021 22: 25
        +1
        Indian technologies are programmers and mathematicians.
        In short, the use of Russian and Chinese technologies will lead to the collapse of the American industry and the US economy.
        It is a pity that there was no public Net in the 60s, but then there were newspapers that wrote that "the use of Japanese and Singaporean technologies will lead to the collapse of the American industry and economy."
        1. eklmn
          eklmn 14 January 2021 22: 41
          -6
          "Indian technologies are programmers and mathematicians."
          Retrained Indian programmers at work (before retiring). Many graduated from an “institute” in India, where they studied for 10-12 months, and the name of the teacher (and he was alone!) Sounded very Russian ..)))
          By the way, 90% of robocalls on the phone have a strong Indian accent! So their "technology" has already penetrated the US.
      2. ZEMCH
        ZEMCH 15 January 2021 00: 44
        +3
        Quote: eklmn
        If Russian ones come in, the size of US microsatellites will increase several times

        The USA is still very far from Russian laser developments, in our country, according to the old habit, the new goes to the "defense", and only then to the "civilian", they have the opposite))), as for engines for satellites, we supply SPT (stationary plasma engine) for many satellite manufacturers: Space System / Loral, Airbus)))
        OneWeb satellites with our engines, the most powerful ion engine we have ever created. You can talk a lot about the technologies that are critical and guarded here and that the Americans and Chinese want to access.
        So, do not worry, many microsatellites and macro)) fly in space, thanks to our technologies)) laughing
  • mark2
    mark2 14 January 2021 19: 59
    +1
    The US intends to prevent the penetration of American technology by the Russian and Chinese military


    - Does Russia need it?
    - No, Russia doesn't need it!
  • Rose capone
    Rose capone 14 January 2021 20: 03
    +2
    The main Russian technology is Donald Trump. There would be more guys like that in the White Chaos.
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 14 January 2021 20: 20
      +6
      Trump is just White America's reaction to all the tolerant chaos. Russians simply sympathize.
  • avdkrd
    avdkrd 14 January 2021 20: 10
    +2
    It would be great if Russia and China adopted a similar act. The leakage of Soviet technology is at the heart of "cutting edge" American weapons innovation.
    Chinese chips even lit up in the F35. ASPs are great at marketing even when they are not selling anything. This is really their strong point. States know how to organize demand, even for something that does not exist. Even absolutely unnecessary or not working.
    The world financial system, in conjunction with the state, which is its monopolist, can, if desired, sell even what is not.
    I'm curious what this document is for? Wasn't it like that before? Was it possible for American companies to transfer technology to Russia before?
  • rocket757
    rocket757 14 January 2021 20: 13
    +6
    Nothing new in general.
    Now, their main "technology" is green candy wrappers .... so they would be returned to them, finally, then surely they will heal like .... or will they not heal ???
    1. Mountain shooter
      Mountain shooter 14 January 2021 20: 51
      +4
      Quote: rocket757
      Now, their main "technology" is green candy wrappers .... so they would be returned to them, finally, then surely they will heal like .... or won't they?

      I'm afraid they will begin to live much worse than now ... wassat
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 14 January 2021 20: 56
        +2
        Even the wisest wisest ones begin to learn to live within their means when they stop being served.
        Interesno, but with minke whales such a trick will work?
  • DEVIL LIFE`S
    DEVIL LIFE`S 14 January 2021 20: 13
    +1
    If they do not produce and sell, then they may not fall into third hands.
  • APASUS
    APASUS 14 January 2021 20: 18
    +2
    If I am not mistaken, similar regulations are adopted in the USA every year. What's changing, especially in China
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 14 January 2021 20: 24
      +2
      Trump changed the concept. The withdrawal of production from China to the USA. And he almost fulfilled it (according to his election program), but then a Pandemic happened with a source in Juhan. And OOPS ...
      1. bar
        bar 14 January 2021 20: 52
        +3
        If only a pandemic. Then Biden happened with his old strings in China ...
  • Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 14 January 2021 20: 45
    0
    A big plus is that the source of technology is now not only the West, but also Asia. Sorry not for the RF. And civilian technology has become very close to the military.
  • bar
    bar 14 January 2021 20: 49
    +3
    The US intends to prevent the penetration of American technology by the Russian and Chinese military.

    Then let them stay away from our borders, otherwise you never know ...
  • opuonmed
    opuonmed 14 January 2021 21: 04
    -1
    tell me about what technologies are the us talking about? (do not write about processors pliz already in 2021, all servers are transferred to Elbrus and the purchase of current, our processors for the state which are made in china in taiwan and so on according to our drawings the whole world is doing there) just tell me about what technologies they are afraid of
  • Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 14 January 2021 21: 16
    +3
    The US intends to prevent the penetration of American technology by the Russian and Chinese military.


    Is there still technology there? laughing
  • eklmn
    eklmn 14 January 2021 21: 23
    -4
    "... since these departments do not use American technology in their activities"
    Fuh ... relieved ... !!! laughing
  • amr
    amr 14 January 2021 21: 59
    -3
    Quote: rruvim
    And I'm not saying that America, having gathered the best minds of humanity (of different nationalities), according to the principle of its formation, was not a locomotive of technical progress. And Germany during the Third Reich, being mono-national, generally broke forward in the technological aspect. I'm talking about America today, 21 of the 21st century. And I don't believe in new technological advances. China is clearly ahead.


    all this is nonsense, the entire Internet is in the hands of America, and accordingly she is the leader, no, I was mistaken she is the most-most-most leader!
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 14 January 2021 22: 40
      +1
      What is the leader? What do they have on their territory nodes (servers) Internet? Long ago not so! Leader as the largest military power? China is not inferior to her in military power? What is the leader? I will answer my questions myself. Not the USA, but the FRS in the USA - the leader, like the Golden Calf opposite the stock exchange in Manhattan: it produces gold with its hind hoof - emission... Bucks, of course. That's what leadership is! And the rest of the countries have fun and dance to this "hoof" sound, and the elite of Russia as well. That's all the power of America! Yes! Factories, ships ... Yes! America is almost self-sufficient, launch it into Space, it will live without the rest of humanity. But she is no longer a Leader, no matter how her presidents broadcast there.
  • Guru
    Guru 14 January 2021 23: 30
    +1
    We cannot allow the foreign military intelligence of our adversaries, China, Cuba, Russia, Venezuela, Iran and other terrorism-supporting countriesused American technology or services to support their destabilizing activities
    Didn't the United States create al-Qaeda and support ISIS? am
  • fif21
    fif21 15 January 2021 00: 06
    +2
    And we are not so greedy, and we will give them their technologies of color revolutions wassat
  • ZEMCH
    ZEMCH 15 January 2021 00: 48
    +1
    US intends to prevent American technology from getting to Russian and Chinese military

    I hope they will stop transmitting the technology of "color" revolutions in the first place)))
  • Cottodraton
    Cottodraton 15 January 2021 02: 59
    0
    It would be necessary to limit communication of talented students from the Russian Federation, India and China with "recruiters" from the USA and co. And then "their" technologies are developed by the latter ...
  • Sasha from Uralmash
    Sasha from Uralmash 15 January 2021 03: 28
    0
    And before that, please take it, was it?
  • EXPrompt
    EXPrompt 15 January 2021 08: 11
    0
    Russia does not need technologies of total lies.
    There is nothing else to take.
  • viktor_47
    viktor_47 15 January 2021 09: 45
    0
    That's really nasty Chinese! And the Russians, these are generally out-of-bounds ... Be you a horseman, be you on foot, be you incredibly cool, they will tickle you to hiccups and drag you to the bottom!
  • Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 15 January 2021 13: 55
    +1
    We stole, we steal and we will steal. To spite the Americans ... So sleep well, dear Americans!
  • Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 15 January 2021 14: 04
    0
    Quote: pytar
    .... and your photo has nothing to do with the indigenous population of the United States.

    Indigenous peoples of the United States - various Indian tribesin the United States, as well as the Eskimos, Aleuts and Hawaiians.


    We are discussing realities, not the past ...

    Good! good Let's take a look at the reality then! yes

    In terms of patents for inventions and the number of inhabitants, China is ahead of Russia by 5,5 times, and the United States by 10 times! This is on the topic of Zadornov "Americans are stupid"and "the Chinese can't think of anything, they just copy"...



    We have Martians sitting at the Patent Institute who are leaking patents directly to Americans. And the best applications are rejected and also passed on to the Americans ...
    1. pytar
      pytar 15 January 2021 16: 13
      +1
      We have Martians at the Patent Institutewho leaked patents directly to Americans. And the best applications are rejected and also passed on to the Americans ...

      Do you mean these? wink
  • Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 15 January 2021 18: 26
    0
    Quote: pytar
    We have Martians at the Patent Institutewho leaked patents directly to Americans. And the best applications are rejected and also passed on to the Americans ...

    Do you mean these? wink



    No, like: Chubais, Kudrin, Medvedev and others like them. Back in the days of the USSR, they transferred patents to the States ...
  • amr
    amr 16 January 2021 21: 14
    +1
    Quote: rruvim
    What is the leader? What do they have on their territory nodes (servers) Internet? It’s not so long ago!

    Well, it's not like that for a long time, but the Americans rule the Internet and only they, it's like with factories for the production of basins, but they are all in China now, but the Americans rule them.

    exactly the same about all the production of all electronics, etc. ... everything is done in Asia and they rule from America ...

    Well, in a military sense, they are certainly not a force, as in a political one, and so on, then I don't even understand why we are under sanctions? Why is the entire turnover in the world in dollars? Why does all of Europe walk in front of them on cyrly? whole Europe CARL I'm not talking about asia africa south america !!! Why do all our aligarhs and officials send their children to them for study and life? do they keep their grandmothers there? moreover, it is not so that they are waiting for them with open arms, they still choose who to let in and who not ...
    Why is our culture oriented towards Hollywood?

    .... well, in general, everything is not so beautiful, it is a pity and painful for the homeland, and living in the world of rose-colored glasses is a dead end!