Military Review

AUG, led by the aircraft carrier "Shandong" went to the exercises: the Chinese Navy will close part of the South China Sea until January 7

59
AUG, led by the aircraft carrier "Shandong" went to the exercises: the Chinese Navy will close part of the South China Sea until January 7

The Chinese press publishes information about the closure of part of the South China Sea until January 7. The water area is closed for civil shipping. This is due to the military maneuvers that are going to be carried out by the PLA Navy. At the same time, the Ministry of Defense of the PRC does not officially report on specific ships that will be involved in the exercises.


However, Chinese journalists have shed some light on this issue.

It is reported that the aircraft carrier Type 001A "Shandong" with a group of warships and auxiliary vessels will take part in the maneuvers. Recall that this is the first aircraft carrier built by China.

PLA Navy Captain Liu Wengshen:

The carrier strike group will conduct exercises in the South China Sea as part of the aircraft carrier Shandong's annual maneuvering schedule.

Earlier it was reported that not so long ago, "Shandong" took part in night maneuvers in the Bohai Bay (part of the Yellow Sea). The reports say that the maneuvers carried out indicate that the PLA Navy aircraft carrier is "fully ready to carry out combat missions at any time of the day."

During the training, flights of deck aviation and logistic support.

There were also reports that the aircraft-carrying warship, leaving the Bohai Bay, headed south and passed through the Taiwan Strait. In fact, this is confirmed by the fact that "Shandong" entered the waters of the South China Sea, where, as announced, maneuvers with the participation of the AUG will take place.

It is noteworthy that in the South China Sea there are also some US Navy ships, including the destroyer John McCain. Recently, his appearance south of Ho Chi Minh City with arguments from the command about "suppressing excessive Vietnamese ambitions" on one of the archipelagoes irritated Vietnam.

Now the destroyer John McCain is likely to oversee the exercises of the Chinese AUG led by the Shandong.
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. donavi49
    donavi49 30 December 2020 14: 00
    +9
    At the Sanya base, the last days were crowded.


    1. Malyuta
      Malyuta 30 December 2020 15: 09
      +16
      Looks beautiful in the pictures. And we can only dream.
  2. Dude
    Dude 30 December 2020 14: 09
    +12
    Glad for the Chinese comrades!
    Since we cannot ("It's too expensive and there is no need for it" © (The largest expert on galoshes in our part of the galaxy)), then ... A holy place is never empty.
    The guys learned the lessons well. Stalin, and ran 30 in 300 years.
    Worthy!
    1. Interlocutor
      Interlocutor 30 December 2020 14: 20
      -4
      Ash bucket to help you
      1. Dude
        Dude 30 December 2020 15: 07
        +2
        And you have to wash with beer!)
    2. Cron
      Cron 30 December 2020 14: 53
      +1
      Quote: Dude
      The guys learned the lessons well. Stalin, and ran 30 in 300 years.

      We ran thanks to the events in Tiananmen Square. Thanks to huge Western investments, which, of course, pursued their own selfish goals. Thanks to the technology they provided them. And due to the fact that they got access to the largest and most solvent markets
      1. Dude
        Dude 30 December 2020 15: 11
        +5
        We ran thanks <...>
        I will not argue with any of your words!
        But despite through и contrary to - still, [b] ran. [/ b] And this is the main thing.
        A man is one who does not speak, but does. ©
        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 30 December 2020 15: 14
          -4
          And then why are you comparing with us? They didn't give us anything like that.
          1. Dude
            Dude 30 December 2020 15: 20
            +10
            Quote: carstorm 11
            And then why are you comparing with us? They didn't give us anything like that.

            Maestro, excuse me, but we were a self-sufficient state, moreover, not alone. No need to juggle, China, with all the Western buns, at the end of the 80s could not be compared with the USSR. Everything was much more complicated for them.
            But they could.
            And we, sorry, loved.
            But, I want to believe - it's not over yet)
            1. carstorm 11
              carstorm 11 30 December 2020 15: 29
              -2
              It doesn't work that way. China has been given markets around the world. Investments from all over the world. Technology flowed from all over the world. Initially different weight categories. For all its self-sufficiency, without these components, situations are not just different. They are just from different planets. Give the RF something like that for 10 years and then it could be compared.
              1. Malyuta
                Malyuta 30 December 2020 15: 38
                +9
                Quote: carstorm 11
                ... China has been given markets around the world. Investments from all over the world.

                I am very sorry, explain who gave it?
                1. carstorm 11
                  carstorm 11 30 December 2020 15: 45
                  -2
                  Do you need a history lesson? Or will you start remembering what and what you discovered for them then from the age of 79?)
                  1. Malyuta
                    Malyuta 30 December 2020 15: 58
                    +13
                    Quote: carstorm 11
                    Do you need a history lesson? Or will you start remembering what and what you discovered for them then from the age of 79?)

                    Sometimes it seems to me that a teenager writes on your behalf, sometimes stealing my father's laptop.
                    And it does not occur to you that, first of all, for the Chinese miracle it is necessary to thank the leadership and the people of China, and not someone who gave something mythical.
                    In addition, by the 80s, China's starting capabilities were negligible compared to the power of the USSR.
                    1. carstorm 11
                      carstorm 11 30 December 2020 16: 07
                      0
                      I somehow humiliated the people of China by the fact that those changes helped them?) In what place may I ask?) There are simply such things as reality. And she's like that. Germany's starting capabilities after the war were none. Remind me what happened after? Are you arguing for the sake of an argument, or are you just having nothing to do?
                2. tralflot1832
                  tralflot1832 30 December 2020 23: 30
                  0
                  Remember this comrade Kisenger. He suggested that China be friends against the USSR. Well, they were friends, slowly with Eastern cunning. And when they grew up, they sent them through the forest. The Tiananmen Square helped them a lot, everything fell into place. Someone gave us a factory from the west to take out ? And they were given! Let them now clear up. According to the CCP's plans, they should exceed the GDP of the United States with all their prostitutes, lawyers and dentists 5 years earlier. By 2025-28, and the caronovirus will help them. In developed regions, the average salary is $ 850 a month, forgotten by God and the authorities, less than $ 2000 per year.
              2. Dude
                Dude 30 December 2020 15: 43
                +3
                It doesn't work that way. China has been given markets around the world. Investments from all over the world. Technology flowed from all over the world. Initially different weight categories.

                Excuse me, are you serious? This can only be said by a person who does not understand the state of affairs that has developed at the end of the 80s.
                China, no doubt, received financial, political (hello to Khrushchev) and technological assistance from, first of all, the United States.
                But even all this cumulative potential cannot be compared with what our state had.
                But, as it turned out, it was enough to buy leading comrades in order to win the confrontation without a war and postpone its collapse.
                But only to postpone, believe me.
                It's bad that we passed a lot of what we had.
                1. carstorm 11
                  carstorm 11 30 December 2020 15: 50
                  0
                  Come on?) I do not want to start an argument here again on the topic of the might of the USSR economy. I just told you what was the impetus for them and it was not available for us.
                  1. Dude
                    Dude 30 December 2020 15: 53
                    +3
                    So we finished hi
                    The truth is born in a dispute ™
                    They lie))
                    1. carstorm 11
                      carstorm 11 30 December 2020 15: 59
                      0
                      Don't lie.))) I just don't want to.) Links, graphics, pictures will fly. Then ardent fighters for all good will come and everything will turn into a bazaar. Already tired. There have been no normal discussions here for a long time.
                      1. Dude
                        Dude 30 December 2020 16: 03
                        +3
                        Congratulations, colleague on the forum! drinks
                        I told you - let's finish our discussion)))
                      2. carstorm 11
                        carstorm 11 30 December 2020 16: 17
                        0
                        And of course you are also happy with the Coming) of course finished)
              3. tralflot1832
                tralflot1832 30 December 2020 23: 37
                +1
                We had to be destroyed, even when we were dying we could take the United States with us to the grave. China could not do it! That's why they were so good, they used to laugh at sneakers from China, but now it’s how it came out.
            2. Revival
              Revival 30 December 2020 17: 27
              +2
              That is, everything to us?
              Have you arrived?
              After all, you can develop only if someone gives what, so in your opinion?
              For example, we will not be given it in the future, so there is no chance, given this logic?
              1. carstorm 11
                carstorm 11 30 December 2020 17: 37
                +1
                Where did I say damn?))) We can do it too. It's just much longer and they will also interfere with us. And very much.
                1. Revival
                  Revival 30 December 2020 21: 03
                  +1
                  Well, it comes out in total.
                  Since "much longer", judging by the current pace of this century, decades are no longer enough
                  1. carstorm 11
                    carstorm 11 30 December 2020 21: 09
                    +2
                    A century? It may well be. Crises are becoming more frequent. Sanctions, wars ... maybe even optimistic.
        2. vadsonen
          vadsonen 30 December 2020 15: 24
          +8
          We were not given anything like that.

          Indeed, the Chinese were sitting, doing nothing, and then bang and everything fell on its head - investments, markets, and technologies. It's different with us. The slave on the gallery rowing with all his might, but the evil Obamas and Trump impose sanctions.
          1. carstorm 11
            carstorm 11 30 December 2020 15: 35
            +1
            Don't talk nonsense. Nobody says that. They did a lot. But the leap was made precisely for the reasons we are talking about. Do not give them this catalyst, the reaction would not go.
    3. Malyuta
      Malyuta 30 December 2020 15: 45
      +15
      Quote: Cron
      We ran thanks to the events in Tiananmen Square. Thanks to huge Western investments, which, of course, pursued their own selfish goals.

      And it never occurred to you that China made a leap thanks to a competent leadership that did not plunder the country, but developed it.
      1. Cron
        Cron 30 December 2020 16: 10
        0
        Quote: Malyuta
        And it never occurred to you that China made a leap thanks to a competent leadership that did not plunder the country, but developed it.

        And who really argues with this? Of course, the first priority is what you wrote about, and then everything else. When I wrote about Tiananmen, it was necessary, apparently, to add about the competent leadership, which did not betray or plunder the country. Well, that's what I meant. There you can also talk about reforms.
        I just noticed that for many, China made a leap only thanks to competent leadership, which did not plunder the country, but developed it. This is of course all interesting, but sometimes it may not be enough.
        1. Revival
          Revival 30 December 2020 17: 29
          +1
          Yes, without this, no matter how hard you go, only the yachts will be thicker, and nothing else, it has been proven imperially
      2. sedoj
        sedoj 30 December 2020 16: 53
        -2
        Quote: Malyuta
        And it never occurred to you that China made a leap thanks to a competent leadership that did not plunder the country, but developed it.

        I beg your pardon, but in China officials steal the same way as elsewhere:
        https://rg.ru/2009/06/25/korrupcia.html
    4. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 30 December 2020 20: 48
      0
      Quote: Cron
      Thanks to the technology they provided them.

      Small amendment -
      Thanks to the technology that the Chinese around the world have used.
      And so everything is true ...
  3. Ryaruav
    Ryaruav 30 December 2020 19: 12
    0
    Sergey Your comment is incomparable, thanks
  4. Zoldat_A
    Zoldat_A 30 December 2020 20: 42
    0
    Quote: Dude
    The guys learned the lessons well. Stalin, and ran 30 in 300 years.
    Worthy!

    They also have their own Sun Tzu - there is no need for them from I.V. study. We ought to learn from Sun Tzu - by God, there is something.
    1. IL-18
      IL-18 30 December 2020 23: 31
      0
      Quote: Zoldat_A
      We ought to learn from Sun Tzu - by God, there is something.

      How many wars has China won? And was this notorious Sun Tzu?
      "Nothing can sit on the throne, except for the ass! - Sun-jiao-Bing XIII century" ©
      1. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 30 December 2020 23: 40
        +1
        Quote: IL-18
        How many wars has China won?

        None, because Sun Tzu was forgotten - yours is true. And our chief of staff of the brigade, Lieutenant Colonel Vlasenko, carried him in his pocket - that's why there were a minimum of losses, that's why the boys, the chief of staff, loved him.
        Any general with his feet grows from his soldiers
        Not one thousand years of the phrase ...
  • askort154
    askort154 30 December 2020 14: 10
    +3
    It is time for China to conduct exercises not in the South China Sea, but in the Pacific Ocean, off the western coast of North America.
    1. Land defence
      Land defence 30 December 2020 15: 09
      +17
      Quote: askort154
      It's time for China to conduct exercises not in the South China Sea, but in the Pacific Ocean

      Gradually, as experience is gained, they will also be carried out in the oceans.
  • Thrifty
    Thrifty 30 December 2020 14: 11
    +1
    Now the Chinese will drive McCain across the sea to show who is boss. lol .
    1. Ryaruav
      Ryaruav 30 December 2020 19: 31
      0
      Thrifty so people have the opportunity and piles like in black, we have an example for the PRC, these guys will behave toughly, and we were afraid all our lives, but in vain, it was in vain that the Jews had something to lose, look at Soros - the pitting amoeba is already weak looking like a normal white man
  • rocket757
    rocket757 30 December 2020 14: 14
    +2
    Well, yes, teachings.
    A soldier / sailor should not sit idle ... contraindicated.
  • KKND
    KKND 30 December 2020 14: 25
    +13
    It is good that all countries claiming the leading position in the world are foolishly building these useless floating troughs to destroy which one missile is enough. We alone are smart - a bunch of articles have already been released where everyone has proven that aircraft carriers in modern warfare are only "show-off".
    Communist China is as stupid as India, we alone understand everything.
    1. Land defence
      Land defence 30 December 2020 15: 06
      +18
      Quote: KKND
      we alone understand everything

      And I think that we are simply not able to build an aircraft carrier and, at the same time, several ships of the ocean zone
      1. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 30 December 2020 15: 15
        -2
        Where to build them then? A normal plant is only being completed where it can be done in the future. Now they are being trained on huge icebreakers.
        1. Land defence
          Land defence 30 December 2020 15: 18
          +19
          Quote: carstorm 11
          Where to build them then?

          I'm talking about this: there is no factory, not enough funds, no deck AWACS, steam catapult has not been tested, etc.
        2. Ros 56
          Ros 56 30 December 2020 15: 33
          -3
          Nikolaev will return home and the heat will go. bully
          1. Malyuta
            Malyuta 30 December 2020 15: 36
            +10
            Quote: Ros 56
            Nikolaev will return home and the heat will go.

            And we ourselves are at home, otherwise it seems that we are in captivity at home.
            1. Ros 56
              Ros 56 30 December 2020 15: 58
              -1
              I can't say anything definite about you, I'm sorry. fellow
          2. Revival
            Revival 30 December 2020 17: 31
            +1
            Do you think will return in the summer?
          3. Ryaruav
            Ryaruav 30 December 2020 19: 21
            +1
            Yuri, for this to happen, many strippers and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs need to think, and not master budgetary amounts
      2. Guru
        Guru 30 December 2020 16: 26
        -1
        And I think that we are simply not able to build an aircraft carrier and, at the same time, several ships of the ocean zone
        one question WHY ??? Do you think we have nowhere else to spend money?
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 30 December 2020 15: 20
      +5
      Quote: KKND
      It is good that all countries claiming the leading position in the world are foolishly building these useless floating troughs to destroy which one missile is enough. We alone are smart - a bunch of articles have already been released where everyone has proven that aircraft carriers in modern warfare are only "show-off".
      Communist China is as stupid as India, we alone understand everything.

      Exactly. The whole world is out of step, we alone are in step. smile
    3. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 30 December 2020 15: 43
      -2
      Quote: KKND
      It is good that all countries claiming the leading place in the world are foolishly building these useless floating troughs to defeat which is enough

      Of course not stupid. But, you must admit, with our weapons, without taking into account ICBMs, we reach both Europe and the United States up and down, which cannot be said about the Chinese and Indians. And from Australia, South America and Africa we are not particularly threatened. Therefore, AUG would not hurt us, but its absence, I suppose, does not bother us.
    4. Vladimir1155
      Vladimir1155 30 December 2020 18: 14
      +3
      Quote: KKND
      useless floating troughs to defeat which one missile is enough.
      this applies exclusively to Kuzi, because China will surround its AB with dozens of frigates, and the adversary will not get to it .... China also has very important points (third world countries) far from its territory where it has huge interests, and the Russian Federation has such there are no points, and there are almost no frigates.
  • LAWNER
    LAWNER 30 December 2020 15: 28
    +1
    In 2017, this Mac Caine kissed a tanker near Singapore. 10 people are missing, 5 are injured. Maybe that's why China is closing the area so that history does not repeat itself?
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 30 December 2020 15: 32
    -2
    It's high time to scare a little striped ones, but they will come to see.
  • Gunther
    Gunther 30 December 2020 21: 16
    +1
    .. in the South China Sea there are also some US Navy ships, including the destroyer John McCain. Recently, his appearance south of Ho Chi Minh City with arguments from the command about "suppressing excessive Vietnamese ambitions"

    it would be consistent, with the filing of agent Donald, under the curtain, "to suppress excessive Chinese ambitions" laughing
  • Nikon OConor
    Nikon OConor 31 December 2020 18: 01
    -1
    So I understand this is a Kuznetsov clone? If so, is it a cruiser, what is it armed with, except for aircraft? It's just too lazy to dig now ...