U.S. Air Force continues to build up F-35 fighter force in Alaska

The US Air Force continues to build up its Arctic force by deploying fifth-generation F-35 fighters in Alaska. According to the press service of the Air Force, on December 16, five more fighters arrived at Eielson airbase.

To date, the number of fifth-generation F-35 fighters at the air base has reached 20 units. A total of 54 F-35 fighters are expected to be deployed, by the end of 2021, the 336th and 335th squadrons, based at Eielson airbase, should receive all aircraft. Thus, each squadron will have 27 fighters.

The last five planes arrived on Wednesday. The total number reached 20 35A Lightning II fighters. We continue to build up our roster. By the end of 2021, we will have all 54 fighters at the base

- said a spokesman for the airbase Kayleigh Dubois, adding that the next group of F-35s will arrive in Alaska in April 2021.

Eielson Air Force Base is located in Fairbanks. Currently, the base is armed with F-16 fighters, A-10 attack aircraft and KS-135 tankers, and the F-35 is being added to them. At Elmendorf-Richardson Air Force Base, home to the headquarters of the United States Armed Forces Command in Alaska (ALCOM), 40 fifth-generation F-22 Raptor fighters are deployed.

The airbase is located about 1200 km from the Russian border in the Far East. The Air Force command explains the deployment of the F-35 in Alaska by the strengthening of Russia's positions in the Arctic region and protection from "Russian bombers". In the absence of icebreakers in control of the Arctic territory, the United States relies on the superiority of its aviation in the air.

Comments

[Mavrikiy]

To date, the number of fifth-generation F-35 fighters at the airbase has reached 20 units. In total, it is planned to deploy 54 F-35 fighters,

I have no doubt that our modernized Kamchatka fighter-interceptors MiG-31BM. they can be resisted, but will they have enough ammunition?

[iouris]

Quote: Mavrikiy

Our 4 MIGs can resist them, but will the ammunition load be enough for them?

The problem is different: where are we going to bury them?

[pipetro]

Why did you edit someone else's quote?

[Mavrikiy]

Quote: pipetro

Why did you edit someone else's quote?

No, I corrected mine, can I?

[Alexey Sommer]

Quote: Mavrikiy

No, I corrected mine, can I?

No.

[Mavrikiy]

Quote: iouris

The problem is different: where are we going to bury them?

Like Quiet, we have not yet drained.

[zyablik.olga]

Quote: iouris

The problem is different: where are we going to bury them?

Will you personally bury it? Maybe you shouldn't think a lot before making such statements? Only in Alaska the Americans have about the same number of fighters as we have in the entire Far East. Khabarovsk and Primorye Territories are within the reach of American combat aircraft deployed in Japan and South Korea. And for some reason I am sure that in the event of a war, quite numerous and modern Japanese and South Korean air forces will act on the US side.

[Cron]

Quote: zyablik.olga

And for some reason I am not sure that in the event of a war, quite numerous and modern Japanese and South Korean air forces will act on the US side.

In case of war, you should only be sure that you will have time to get to the nearest shelter. Everything else is just your fantasy

[zadorin1974]

Good evening Olga. I am also sick of hating, but in the event of a WAR, we (the majority of the civilian population already) will have completely different thoughts and problems than someone else's funeral. And I dare to assure you that the South Koreans in this dump will also have no time for us .Preparing modern aircraft to take off in time is not like raising the IL-2 or B-17. the same rake, plus the PRC. So that everything starts against everyone.

[APASUS]

Quote: zyablik.olga

And for some reason I am sure that in the event of a war, a fairly large and modern Japanese and South Korean air force will act on the US side.

And I'm sure that they will try to just sit out, of course they will drag the shells to the Americans and give their territory, but they will not climb into battle. It's just suicide for these countries.

[YOUR]

Shapkozakidatelstvo some rolls over. Here on the resource a couple of days ago there was an article comparing their Air Force and ours. In terms of personnel, we are tenfold behind them over 300 in the Air Force, with us in the region of 000 a little more. These 30 do not include naval and national guard aviation. Those. in terms of numerical strength, we lose to them more than 300000 (!) times.
I won't talk about the quality of the aircraft, but when a dozen missiles are launched one at a time from different directions, the outcome is decided.
Conclusion: without the Strategic Missile Forces, it will be very, very difficult to resist them

[Adimius38]

a woman is smarter than all of the above-mentioned lovers to tear the vest on themselves.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Adimius38

a woman is smarter than all of the above-mentioned lovers to tear the vest on themselves.

Olga is the wife of Sergey Linnik (aka Bongo) - she knows about the Air Force an order of magnitude more than all the chapcomers from the alternative universe and the Operators combined ...

[Kuz]

They can place on their territory wherever they want. The main thing is that they do not meddle with others.

[figwam]

Quote: Mavrikiy

fighter-interceptors MiG-31BM. they can be resisted, but will they have enough ammunition?

If necessary, there is also a Su-35 nearby, plus ground-based air defense.

[Toucan]

Quote: figvam

If necessary, there is also a Su-35 nearby, plus ground-based air defense.

Do I understand correctly, you want to say that Su-35S are permanently based in Vilyuchinsk? And "not far" is where? Can you tell me from which IAP? And please remind me how many MiG-31s ​​are flying in Kamchatka?

[figwam]

Quote: Tucan

Do I understand correctly, you want to say that Su-35S are permanently based in Vilyuchinsk?

No, not right.

Quote: Tucan

And "not far" is where?

This is the Central Corner.

Quote: Tucan

And please remind me how many MiG-31s ​​are flying in Kamchatka?

The squadron is only recovering from 2019, the threat will grow, we will have a new separate regiment.

[Vladimir247]

There will be a new ... regiment
-------
I have noticed long ago that only the future tense is used by the people of note.

And then we will have, and this will be ... and if something is suddenly there, then where no one knows how much ...

[figwam]

Quote: Vladimir247

I have noticed long ago that only the future tense is used by the people of note.

Yes, and for such people everything is already behind, it remains only to wrap up in a sheet and crawl to the cemetery.

[Toucan]

This is the Central Corner.

Maybe Dzemgi in Komsomolsk-on-Amur? But can you imagine the distance from Elizovo to Komsomolsk? In addition, for the entire center and south of the Far East, we have only two Fighter Regiments: 22nd and 23rd IAP, which must control an area of ​​several Frances.

The squadron is only recovering from 2019, the threat will grow, we will have a new separate regiment.

The number of MiG-31s ​​in Kamchatka has remained stable for 5 years. The decommissioned interceptors can hardly be replaced with refurbished ones. There will be no new regiment for the MiG-31 for sure. Perhaps it will be possible to create a mixed with the Su-35S as in the 22nd IAP.

[figwam]

Quote: Tucan

But can you imagine the distance from Elizovo to Komsomolsk?

For reinforcement, aircraft are simply relocated to the desired airfield, this has always been done.

[Bongo]

Quote: figvam

For reinforcement, aircraft are simply relocated to the desired airfield, this has always been done.

Exposing your area of ​​responsibility. God forbid we have 100 fighters for the entire Far Eastern Federal District. As for the airfields suitable for basing fighters, do you know how many are left in the Russian Far East?

[figwam]

Quote: Bongo

As for airfields suitable for basing fighters, do you know how many are left in the Russian Far East?

The Americans have 2-3 military airfields in Alaska 1000 km from our borders, and then they will be restored and modernized for several more years, I see no reason for unrest.

[Bongo]

Quote: figvam

The Americans have 2-3 military airfields in Alaska 1000 km from our borders, and then they will be restored and modernized for several more years, I see no reason for unrest.

Do you understand the difference between an airfield where combat aircraft can be based and an airbase? Apparently not.
In Alaska, there are really 2 air bases on which fighters are constantly based. But there are much more suitable runways. Against our forces in the northeast is the 11th US Air Force, whose aircraft is mainly deployed in Alaska. In terms of numbers, it roughly corresponds to our entire fighter fleet in the Far East. The main potential enemy of the Russian Aerospace Forces in the Pacific-Asian region is considered to be the US Air Force Command in the Pacific Air Force, headquartered at Hikkam airbase, Hawaii. Subordinate to the Pacific Command are the 5th (Japan), 7th (Republic of Korea), 11th (Alaska) and 13th (Hawaii) air armies. In total, there are approximately 270 American F-35A, F-16C / D and F-15C / D fighters at Japanese and South Korean air bases. In addition, the Yokosuka naval base is a permanent forward base for US aircraft carriers. Since 2008, there has been a Nimitz-class nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, George Washington. He was recently replaced on duty in Japan by the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan, on which the 5th Aircraft Carrier Wing is based. It has three F / A-18E / F Super Hornet fighter-assault squadrons.
If we take into account the Air Forces of Japan and South Korea, then the superiority over the Russian Aerospace Forces in the region turns out to be fourfold.

[figwam]

Quote: Bongo

Do you understand the difference between an airfield where combat aircraft can be based and an airbase? Apparently not.

It's good that you understand)
The article was about twenty F-35s based in Alaska, 1000 km from our border, and from our bases for 1500-2000 km, they simply cannot physically reach us and I repeat, with an increase in the number of enemy aircraft, I will relocate to the Far East our aircraft, including the new Su-35, as you may have already noticed, the first MiG-31s ​​flew to Anadyr, but you also fastened other countries here, Korea, Japan, aircraft carriers. In this case, there are missiles that will deter the unreasonable.
And I am not against a large number of our airfields and aircraft, the main thing here is not to overstrain and react in accordance with the situation.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: figvam

Quote: Tucan

But can you imagine the distance from Elizovo to Komsomolsk?

For reinforcement, aircraft are simply relocated to the desired airfield, this has always been done.

Uh-huh.
Only now, a modern aircraft needs several tens of hours of expenses to prepare for departure.
It is necessary not only to relocate the planes, but also hundreds of BAO people, providing a bunch of equipment. Ammunition also needs to be relocated.
Repair shops.
The fuel is the same.
Or is it all taken out of thin air?
It was in the 40-50s - they took and transferred the squadron to a new field.
The main thing is that it would not be plowed ...

And now everything is a thousand times more complicated.

[Sergey39]

Quote: Tucan

how many MiG-31s ​​flying in Kamchatka?

Yesterday there was news: "At the airfields of Chukotka, fighter-interceptors MiG-31 took over on duty."

[next322]

in Anadyr there is one flight of MiG-31 !!!! and this is already 3 aircraft ... in Kamchatka, the squadron of MiG-31 ... not a lot

[Sergey39]

Quote: next322

not much

There is also air defense. A MIG-31 for attacking airfields.

[Vitaly Pogrebnyak]

Since when? Do you know what this plane is for?

[Sergey39]

I know. "Daggers" are quite suitable for striking airfields.

[Evgeny Goncharov (smoogg)]

You don't have a single Dagger on the Far East, wipe yourself off.

[iouris]

This is some kind of stripped-down link. There are two "pairs" in the link.

[Toucan]

This is a jump airfield, they are unlikely to be permanently based there. Besides, three fighters are not even funny.

[Kuz]

Quote: Tucan

how many MiG-31s ​​flying in Kamchatka?

This is a military secret.

[Toucan]

This is a military secret.

This is not a secret, our "partners" are well aware of this.

[jonht]

Dear, Vilyuchinsk is a submarine base, and aviation is in Yelizovo, at a dual-purpose airfield, now it seems like another airfield will begin to be restored, but definitely not in Vilyuchensk.

[Toucan]

Dear, Vilyuchinsk is a submarine base, and aviation is in Elizovo, at a dual-purpose airfield

You are absolutely right, I think one thing, I write another on the machine.

[jonht]

It happens , but it's better to fix it, there are many who may not know what's what.

[Doccor18]

Alaska has always been home to the most advanced US fighters. And the F22 was there, and now the F35 will be added to them. Americans have always closely followed the Russian East.

[voyaka uh]

Once they followed the Soviet East.
Today - for China.
All 5th generation fighters are there against him.
Both F-22 and F-35.
Closer to China, they are afraid to deploy them, so as not to be covered in the first
minutes of conflict.

[_Ugene_]

Today - for China.
All 5th generation fighters are there against him.

As it is doubtful, from Fairbanks to the border of China almost 5 thousand. km., only one way to fly two refueling needs

[voyaka uh]

There will be a jump to Japan, to the American base.
F-22 is also kept in Alaska.
And at one time they were close to China.
Then they realized that it was risky.

[Leon68]

In fact, the Merikatos F-22s have been based in Hawaii for a long time. And this is much closer to Alaska to the Chinese. So that

Quote: voyaka uh

Closer to China, they are afraid to deploy them, so as not to be covered in the first
minutes of conflict.

there is nonsense

[Vitaly Pogrebnyak]

The MiG-31 was originally conceived as an interceptor for cruise missiles, there is no need to pull an owl on the globe, we need the SU-57 and as soon as possible.

[Vladimir247]

Vitaly Pogrebnyak
Su 57.
-------
Needed. But there are only 7 of them. For the year they plan to put another one in the troops.
And we also need crews, of which the troops are understaffed, in 2000 people.
And we also need new runways, their anti-aircraft cover, and so on and so on.
This is not discussed here, not the level of the forum, but it is necessary to start sometime.
It is very good that you raised this problem. It seems that the bulk of people simply do not realize that the current "effective managers" are simply not able to produce anything in sufficient quantities. They basically don't know how to do it. Well, they've never done this in their life, and then suddenly here you are ... you need ...
This is a difference, and a big one, or a dozen, or even another, to rivet, or organize more or less mass production.
There immediately emerges a set of questions about which the "managers" are not even aware. Starting from the personnel, the same adjusters of CNC machines, machining centers, their qualifications, their number in the end. None of this is in sight.
In short, we have a bunch of problems in the military-industrial complex. We must start with him. And see where these problems are growing ...
Basically, we all know that fish rots from the head ...

[Vladimir247]

And the most important question is how many MiGs do we have there? Americans Siavat 54, and how much are we?

[Russobel]

And Russia is building up its air defense forces in the Far East and the Kuril Islands

[Sergey39]

Yes. And this is called an "arms race".

[XXXIII]

Yes, they want to pull into the race just by air, since they are behind in rockets. But they realized that Russia will not fall for this, will focus on missiles, and consistently bring the aircraft fleet and carriers in general to the required volume. Fuck these F35s when they are covered by a hundred missiles at the air base.))

[Vladimir247]

Hundred rockets ...
--------
Do we have this hundred missiles? And what, and there is someone to give the order? Chio is a lot of dickheads ...
After all, they should be the first to hit ... there is no one to ask even for their downed helicopter, but here they should hit the USA ... why were you smoking there, such a fierce one?

[XXXIII]

Quote: Vladimir247

Do we have this hundred missiles?

And who knows this here?))

Quote: Vladimir247

After all, they must hit first ...

Definitely as soon as possible.

Quote: Vladimir247

there is no one to ask even for his downed helicopter

This is an isolated incident, not a mass phenomenon. They shoot down, knock down, not only Russian cars.

[Vladimir247]

And who knows this here?
----------
Well, that's for sure for you, right ...
So share your "knowledge" ...


As soon as possible ...
------ ,,
And Raikin is not a relative to you ... about turning on the fool?

Single case..
-------
Oh really ? Where did you learn to lie so blatantly? Is it really in the training manual? And the plane shot down by the Turks? And the ambassador killed by the Turks? Which, clearly not an airplane, but a precedent for a full blow to Ankara and Istanbul at least?

[XXXIII]

Quote: Vladimir247

Well, that's for sure for you, right ...
So share your "knowledge" ...

No need to distort the meaning, do not understand and do not think. Or maybe you can list the number of slides?

Quote: Vladimir247

And the ambassador killed by the Turks?

Somewhere you went wrong, the ambassador is not a plane and he was not shot down with a rocket. Does the manual work ?! In general, do not mow under a sick recruit, there will be a target, there will be a rocket for it.

[Vladimir247]

The ambassador is definitely not a plane. Can you read, grandpa? That's what it was written to you. For the murder of ambassadors, normal countries and governments, bend rivals in full, up to territorial compensation.
It is time.
And what about the downed plane? Srekhal, it turns out, dudushko ..?

[XXXIII]

How many American ambassadors and military personnel have been killed in Iraq? Iraq bent? Looks like no.

[BABAY22]

The kneading will begin - the base will definitely be covered. But the planes will no longer be there.
According to all the rules adopted in our country, on alarm, planes descend to dispersal aerodromes.
I do not think that their generals are more stupid than ours, and will sit and wait for them to arrive from above.

[sabakina]

BABAY22, I have a question. Before the alarm are the planes filled up and ready to take off? And the second question. How long does it take to get the plane ready for departure? Now is not the middle of the twentieth century. This is not the MiG-5-7, not the IL-2, which can be prepared for departure in minutes. If before the Second World War we could not disperse aviation, then what can we say now?

[knn54]

-Difficult ice conditions;
- rather extended communications;
-Difficult logistics.
Ie aviation is ahead of everyone here.

[K-612-O]

The range of the Kh-101/102 is 4,5k km, even the Kh-55 is 2,5k, airfields will be destroyed even before these aircraft take off, without entering the air defense zone. In general, let the F-35 first be adopted, the F-22 is the enemy more dangerous

[Tsoy]

In general, let the F-35 first enter service.

So there are 54 of them only in Alaska. In the combat unit. Already accepted several years ago.

[Sergey39]

Quote: Choi

Already accepted several years ago.

Conditionally accepted.

[K-612-O]

No, not accepted. Due to the lack of combat readiness. The software rework should end only at the age of 21 and the question is whether it will finally work as the military requires, and it is not known about the oxygen system when the design blunder will be solved, again the inability to fly for a long time at supersonic. Therefore, the delivery to the troops with the subsequent modernization of the delivered aircraft was approved, but they are not in service and cannot be used in combat operations, with the exception of test ones.
It is in our combat units that only fully used production aircraft go, for amers it happens that way, the budget must be inflated and cut.

[voyaka uh]

Americans have the concepts of "initial" and "full" combat readiness.
F-35 - in the initial. This status allows you to form combat
squadrons and used in hostilities.
In the past, Americans have had aircraft types that have successfully fought a couple of wars.
and were written off after 20-30 years of service, and did not receive the status of full combat
readiness.

[XXXIII]

That's right, even if they bet 1000, who will let them take off. They will fly two by two as usual to patrol their skies.

[Adimius38]

F-35s have already been riveted so much that it will be enough to re-equip all fighter regiments of Russia and this is much faster than 1-2 SU-57 per year

[migsu]

It's like placing carts in a train without horses and without a fourth wheel in each cart ... and say: "Let's go!"

[Tsoy]

Interestingly, the arrived and the rest of the "Alaskan" F-35s differ from other serial machines. The rubber on the chassis is different so as not to crack from the anti-icing coating of the strip. The Danes have the same. (Not a fact, but they wrote about it)

[orcinus]

Especially for the "uracals" - on the next branch there is news about the entry, or rather the return after modernization, one moment-31) something there, in the comments, I do not see a "festival". And then there are 5 new planes, but wow! Such news should be analyzed, and not promised to knock everyone off the couch in batches.

[Whirlwind]

Yes, calm down, such new ... worse than our "old" ...
The more ... the more, the better for us.

[orcinus]

Who is "us"? And "poke" will be sand in the sandbox

[orcinus]

Who is "us"? And "poke" you will be sand with a duck in the sandbox

[Ros 56]

Let them take care of the Faberge, otherwise they will freeze, it will not be before the war.

[Ros 56]

Does anyone know how long it takes to prepare for the F-35 flight?

[outsider]

Quote: Mavrikiy

To date, the number of fifth-generation F-35 fighters at the airbase has reached 20 units. In total, it is planned to deploy 54 F-35 fighters,

I have no doubt that our modernized Kamchatka fighter-interceptors MiG-31BM. they can be resisted, but will they have enough ammunition?

- The poor fellows do not understand how close the F-35 can get to the MiG-31 before he sees it. In a duel situation with the F-35, the MiG-31 is doomed to defeat - by 146%. But you will never believe it and you will never understand it ...

[dauria]

- The poor fellows do not understand how close the F-35 can get to the MiG-31 before he sees it.

By the detection range of the F-15 (300 km), divided by the fourth root of 10. Total - 168 km with a probability of PO 0, 7.
At the same time, the F-35 should be without external suspensions, and therefore without missiles with a range of more than 100 km. Pleasant flight .
Oh yes . I almost forgot . Be sure to turn on the radar on the F-35, dear duelist. We must somehow aim at the defenseless MIG.

[outsider]

- The APG-81 radar of the F-35 aircraft sees a target with RCS = 1 m² at D = 160 km in normal mode and at D = 135 km in LPI mode. RCS of the MiG-31 aircraft from the front hemisphere> 25 m35, it will be detected by the F-160 at D = 25 * √√ (1: XNUMX) =358 km or D = 135 * √√ (25: 1) =302 km.
The MiG-31 sees a target with an RCS = 19 m² at D = 200 km, an F-35 aircraft with RCS = 0.0001 m² will be seen at D = 200 / √√ (19: 0.0001) =9.6 km.

[dauria]

aircraft F-35 with RCS = 0.0001 mXNUMX

Bravo. From what ceiling is such an amazing figure? Yes, a wet crow has an EPR of 0, 1, if it spreads its wings and opens its beak. I understand everything ... Advertising is the engine of trade. But not to the same extent.
Yes, by the way, your MiG -31 is blind. Its locator is much stronger.
Even the old one from the early 80s. By the way, the world's first phased array on a fighter. And re-read the textbook of Voskresensky, sober up.

[Dread]

Outsider - complexes come out.
The F-35 has absolutely no chance against the Su-35, the R-37M missile is waiting for it.
There is no need to write absurdities about the LPI mode - further than 70 km the F-35 does not "see" the target in this mode - the power of the probing pulses is too small. And you don't have to write stories from Lockheed-Martin commercials. Your drawings are not correct.

[outsider]

- I understand that those present prefer the billboards of Uryupinsk, but this is an ostrich position, knowingly by orders of magnitude assess the capabilities of a potential enemy in the direction of decreasing. Talk to the Armenian army, they will arm you with the correct assessment method ...
Is it really not a pity for the pilots who, with an open visor on the MiG-31, rush to 2.83M towards the F-35 - and get under the visor what they could not even dream of ?!

[Alexfly]

Isn't this a direct threat to the Russian Federation, the concentration of offensive weapons on the borders of our vast Fatherland ?? Isn't it worth it to put the Iskander's calculations there, or the latter for the possible neglect of the incoming threats ??

[My doctor]

Quote: AlexFly

Isn't this a direct threat to the Russian Federation, the concentration of offensive weapons on the borders of our vast Fatherland ?? Isn't it worth it to put the Iskander's calculations there, or the latter for the possible neglect of the incoming threats ??

What not smart person gave you a plus.

[Vladimir247]

Well, that is, you assert and take responsibility that there is no threat?

[My doctor]

Quote: Vladimir247

Well, that is, you assert and take responsibility that there is no threat?

No, I claim that the first sentence

Quote: AlexFly

Isn't this a direct threat to the Russian Federation, the concentration of offensive weapons on the borders of our vast Fatherland ??

built with a mockery, compiled from slogans.
second

Quote: AlexFly

Isn't it worth it to put the Iskander's calculations there, or the latter for the possible neglect of the incoming threats ??

As if the Iskanders are idle and need to be attached to the border. And how to understand the word reading "or this", maybe more correctly "or other complexes"? But my chair smokes the most from the two question marks at the end of sentences.

[Alexfly]

You are right, a mistake, it was necessary to write ONE, since the plural form does not combine .. Ah um Verry Sorry ...)))

[My doctor]

Quote: Vladimir247

Well, that is, you assert and take responsibility that there is no threat?

NO. I argue that the text is mockingly compiled from slogans, and the inserted words are hurting the eyes. For example

Quote: AlexFly

Isn't it worth it to put the Iskander's calculations there, or the latter for the possible neglect of the incoming threats ??

Perhaps instead of "Isn't it worth it" it was necessary "Is it worth it and Нam "or remove the union" and "then -" Isn't it worth it "? And why" or this "? Perhaps it was necessary" or calculations other complexes "? And how do you" for a possible unbelief "? Maybe it was necessary" for perhapsСти leveling "? What is wrong with the" incoming threats "you can figure it out for yourself. But the main reason why my chair is smoking is the two question marks at the end of the sentence.
As a result, it turns out that the Iskander complexes are lying somewhere idle and it is only necessary to install them to protect "our vast Fatherland."

[Vladimir247]

But in essence? It turns out some nagging about style, and then sucked, it is not clear where.

[Alexfly]

Dima, you understood correctly, go ahead, saw the weight, it is still golden ...

[My doctor]

Quote: AlexFly

Dima, you understood correctly, go ahead, saw the weight, it is still golden ...

the comment did not appear immediately, I had to write the same thing twice

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Vladimir247

Well, that is, you assert and take responsibility that there is no threat?

And what will Iskander help you with in Chukotka?

Well, just answer.

[opuonmed]

shock grouping is strengthened, which means they will strike at the Kuriles! interesting God forbid this will be what the Russian Federation will do? like sauces liberated by the Japanese smoked

[Vladimir247]

Well what to do? Express concern ... maybe Masha Zazarova will dance a new dance ...

[Alexey Sommer]

Top var site is lost.
Here are no longer Russian masters.

[Vladimir247]

A. Sommer
--------
Yes, let them be in charge. They have a feather in them, a fair breeze ...
They start banning - the site will crash in traffic. The project will close, and ... and sucking a paw is not hot for anyone, right?
So, let yourself draw the ranks of generals ...

[Narak-zempo]

There is no place for penguins in the north, let them be based in Antarctica

[Vlad5307]

Quote: Tucan

Quote: figvam

If necessary, there is also a Su-35 nearby, plus ground-based air defense.

Do I understand correctly, you want to say that Su-35S are permanently based in Vilyuchinsk? And "not far" is where? Can you tell me from which IAP? And please remind me how many MiG-31s ​​are flying in Kamchatka?

Actually, the MiG-31 is not for intercepting pregnant penguins, and secondly, there is a 3-level air defense system. And in the event of a serious mess of the Russian Federation vs FSA, all these toys will be needed as a dead poultice. The use of aircraft by the FSA is realistic only against the Papuans, who do not have a normal air defense, as all the FSA's interventions of the last 30 years show.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Vlad5307

Quote: Tucan

Quote: figvam

If necessary, there is also a Su-35 nearby, plus ground-based air defense.

Do I understand correctly, you want to say that Su-35S are permanently based in Vilyuchinsk? And "not far" is where? Can you tell me from which IAP? And please remind me how many MiG-31s ​​are flying in Kamchatka?

Actually, the MiG-31 is not for intercepting pregnant penguins, and secondly, there is a 3-level air defense system. And in the event of a serious mess of the Russian Federation vs FSA, all these toys will be needed as a dead poultice. The use of aircraft by the FSA is realistic only against the Papuans, who do not have a normal air defense, as all the FSA's interventions of the last 30 years show.

Show us normal air defense in the Far East and the Arctic ...
Preferably on the map.
with zones of suppression of enemy aircraft.

Search for yourself?
Well, I'm just saying that when a person wants to figure it out, he looks for information and analyzes it.
Himself.
And then, having figured it out, he already writes.

You write - according to the manuals, not understanding a bit.

[Berg berg]

Alaska is Russian territory and we categorically demand that America withdraw all its military formations from there!

[Dzafdet]

It is necessary to pull up the Zircons from the YaBCH there. So that during "X" they immediately slam them ...

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Dzafdet

It is necessary to pull up the Zircons from the YaBCH there. So that during "X" they immediately slam them ...

Will you pull on yourself?

[Dzafdet]

Quote: Outsider

Quote: Mavrikiy

To date, the number of fifth-generation F-35 fighters at the airbase has reached 20 units. In total, it is planned to deploy 54 F-35 fighters,

I have no doubt that our modernized Kamchatka fighter-interceptors MiG-31BM. they can be resisted, but will they have enough ammunition?

- The poor fellows do not understand how close the F-35 can get to the MiG-31 before he sees it. In a duel situation with the F-35, the MiG-31 is doomed to defeat - by 146%. But you will never believe it and you will never understand it ...

Yes Yes. He's invisible and invulnerable. only the Syrians did not know this and soaked an Israeli penguin from the C-200 ...

[Dzafdet]

Quote: Ros 56

Does anyone know how long it takes to prepare for the F-35 flight?

20 hours ... Inspection, coating ... Tests ...

[Dzafdet]

Quote: voyaka uh

Americans have the concepts of "initial" and "full" combat readiness.
F-35 - in the initial. This status allows you to form combat
squadrons and used in hostilities.
In the past, Americans have had aircraft types that have successfully fought a couple of wars.
and were written off after 20-30 years of service, and did not receive the status of full combat
readiness.

Well, then, in Israel, do not relax the rolls. We will destroy you together with the USA ...

[outsider]

- If you are not eaten by the Chinese before. Most likely it will. And there is no one to protect you ... Erdogan will not intercede for you?

[Vladimir247]

Chinese? Why would the guests come in large numbers?

[XXXIII]

Quote: Dzafdet

Well, then, in Israel, do not relax the rolls. We will destroy you together with the USA ...

Nafig need, hara-kiri themselves will do.

[Iris]

.. We will destroy you together with the USA ...

"Who are "we ? The first Urapatriotnaya Sofa?
I suggest that you personally focus on a more relevant "combat" task - behave more modestly on the forum.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Dzafdet

Quote: voyaka uh

Americans have the concepts of "initial" and "full" combat readiness.
F-35 - in the initial. This status allows you to form combat
squadrons and used in hostilities.
In the past, Americans have had aircraft types that have successfully fought a couple of wars.
and were written off after 20-30 years of service, and did not receive the status of full combat
readiness.

Well, then, in Israel, do not relax the rolls. We will destroy you together with the USA ...

I understand that you are a general or a marshal in the first Civilization?

[Botanologist]

Modern war is not an air battle of 100500 aircraft in a sphere vacuum. Obviously, we cannot build 1 our own aircraft for 1 US aircraft. Because there is China, Japan, Korea, and NATO. They will always and everything will have more if we do not want to repeat the fate of the USSR. We'll have to learn how to hit the thinnest place and so that their defense / attack system begins to crumble. What are we talking about that there will be 54 penguins and 20 raptors? It is better to think about what will happen to their bases and airfields after the impact of the Kh-55 and Calibers from 20385 and Karakurt. And what kind of outfit of forces and means we need for this. And who will be able to maintain the required level of KOH at a critical time. And much more. I personally do not presume to argue what will happen in the beginning - Calibers or UAVs will fly, or the landing force will climb ashore, or we will squeeze the raptors from our coast by air defense forces. And a thousand more or ...

[outsider]

Quote: Berg Berg

Alaska is Russian territory and we categorically demand that America withdraw all its military formations from there!

- We'll have to return the money for which it was purchased - at the current exchange rate and with interest ...

[outsider]

Quote: dauria

Yes, by the way, your MiG-31 is blind. Its locator is much stronger.
Even the old one from the early 80s. By the way, the world's first phased array on a fighter.

- No, this is the data of the MiG-31BM radar, modernized.

And re-read the textbook of Voskresensky, sober up.

- How many of these textbooks I have re-read, you yourself cannot imagine ...

[Iris]

Ordinary planned transfers. Actually, there is nothing to discuss here: they have the right.
I see no cause for concern.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Vitaly Pogrebnyak

The MiG-31 was originally conceived as an interceptor for cruise missiles, there is no need to pull an owl on the globe, we need the SU-57 and as soon as possible.

It was never conceived of as a CD interceptor.

There was simply a fool who voiced that since the MiG-31 has PFAR, it can accordingly detect low-flying targets against the background of the earth, and this is supposedly one of the tasks of the MiG-31.

This is complete nonsense.
The MiG-31 can shoot down no more than one CD in its flight.
No more.
But, for this very sortie, under ideal conditions, he will be able to shoot down a couple of bombers carrying 20-30 of these same missile launchers.

[Dzafdet]

Quote: Iris

.. We will destroy you together with the USA ...

"Who are "we ? The first Urapatriotnaya Sofa?
I suggest that you personally focus on a more relevant "combat" task - behave more modestly on the forum.

Well, as a rocket scientist, I will decide for myself where and how I should behave. They will answer us for the downed Il ...