How ingenious impromptu actions are born in the military sphere

63

Photo https://www.wallpaperflare.com

Very often we find ourselves in a situation where the foreign policy situation suddenly changes.

Future strategy for 70-100 years


And Russia faces a problem that no one seems to have thought about. Russian society, the media, political scientists and analysts are unanimously beginning to sing in chorus that we are losing something, are not ready for the current situation, or our military department did not expect such a development of the situation.

But, some time passes and this chorus starts a completely different song. Oh, what a turn of events. Oh, what an interesting and unexpected solution. Wow, how great is the leader who found him and accepted him. And this despite the fact that the majority know the already sore adage about a good impromptu, which was prepared at home.



After a series of articles about the situation in the Far East, I get a lot of questions about the situation in Donbass, about Moldova's new approach to Russian peacekeepers in Transnistria, about the deployment of Turkish units in Azerbaijan. I understand where the legs of such questions grow. Popular enough media outlets are actively lobbying for these topics in order to maintain interest in themselves and their journalists.

Let's try today to answer these questions from the point of view of strategic planning of political and military actions of our country in the long term. In order for readers to understand this phrase, let me remind you that after the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks discovered analytical materials of the General Staff of the army of the Russian Empire with a prospect of 70-100 years.

Materials that were not just projections, but well-developed strategic operations in the event of such an international situation. I understand that it looks fantastic. But this is a fact of our stories... this is how the General Staff worked in the Russian Empire.

About Donbass and the prospect of the start of active hostilities


Today, it is no secret to anyone that the Ukrainian army is preparing for a large-scale offensive on the LPNR according to the copy of the Azerbaijani army in Nagorno-Karabakh. Heavy artillery is brought up to the contact line almost daily, Tanks, drums Drones Turkish production, electronic warfare systems, etc. American Republicans, NATO and we know about this.

And the Ukrainians themselves do not hide their plans. Even President Zelensky is talking about some kind of plan B, the decision on the transition to the implementation of which he will take on December 9. It is not worth writing about the numerous speeches of Ukrainian officials, leading politicians and experts in various media. It is enough just to watch any Ukrainian TV channel.

The timid comments of some Ukrainian politicians that such an onset of death is similar do not at all fit into the general concept of Ukraine's exit from the political and economic crisis. Everyone understands that the time will soon come when the deceived people will start asking the president and the government for unfulfilled commitments and promises. And both Ukraine's dependence on the IMF and the IMF's decision to suspend tranches will catalyze protest sentiments.

In such a situation, Zelensky needs to start active hostilities in the Donbass. An external enemy and coffins in Ukrainian cities and villages will unite the nation better than any words. And the fight against political opponents can be waged not so much in words as with the use of repressive methods. Any political enemy can be declared an enemy of the people and hidden in the basements of the SBU.

The day before yesterday, Vladimir Zhirinovsky perfectly told how events will develop in the event of the outbreak of hostilities. As always, in a rather sharp form, he described the prospects for a future war. One can argue about the details, but (in essence) he is right. Ukraine is being pushed towards disintegration.

Moreover, it is desirable to make three completely different states from this country. Galicia, which will be on a par with Poland, the Baltic States and Moldova. Ukraine with a non-aligned status and territory in two or three regions. And Little Russia, as a zone of influence of Russia.

Moldova starts a campaign against Russian peacekeepers in Transnistria


Despite the fact that the newly elected President of Moldova Maia Sandu has not yet taken the oath of the president and has not become a full-fledged leader of the country, she has already clearly outlined a course towards confrontation with Russia, towards the withdrawal of Russian peacekeepers from Transnistria.

How this should happen is also clear. Judging by the fact that Sandu will spend his first visits as the newly elected president to Bucharest and Kiev. This means that it is with the help of the blockade of Russian peacekeepers, the blocking of supply routes and the rotation of military personnel that Chisinau, Kiev and Bucharest hope to force Moscow to withdraw military personnel to the territory of Russia or Belarus.

And again Russia is silent. Only now the question of an unbearable debt for Moldova to Gazprom of $ 7,5 billion suddenly surfaced. And the gas price for this country at $ 173 per thousand cubic meters, against $ 235 in 2019, began to raise questions. It is quite possible that Russia will file a claim to terminate the contract. Moreover, for the duration of the trial, they need not be supplied with gas.

And there will be more and more such pitfalls. Until Sandu understands that the issue with the peacekeepers must be resolved primarily with the authorities of Transnistria and Moscow.

Turkey wanted too much to enter the Russian canopy


The fact that Turkey's ambitions have grown enormously lately, I think, is clear to everyone. As long as these ambitions did not directly concern Russia's zones of influence, Moscow tried to pursue a fairly peaceful policy towards Ankara. Other states also have interests that they are trying to implement. This is a normal practice in international relations. Conflicts arise when interests overlap.

At present, the Turks are stubbornly climbing into the zone of our interests. This applies not only to Karabakh, but also to the states of Central Asia, Crimea, Transcaucasia. Turkey just the day before yesterday entered into an agreement with Ukraine on the production of its attack drones in this country.

In fact, Ankara today is trying to carry out the same operation in Kiev that was carried out in Baku. Even Erdogan's goal is clear. Take "yours" when dividing Ukraine. This refers to the Crimea. The scenario that Zhirinovsky voiced was also calculated in Ankara. The lesson of Nagorno-Karabakh, as we see, did not go to the benefit of Turkish politicians.

Memories of the future


Now I will tell you a fantastic story that very few people know. A story about the further development of the political situation in the world.

So, Turkey, despite the fact that it is a member of NATO, behaves quite shamelessly even in relation to other members of this alliance. At the same time, for some reason, the fact that the British are keeping Erdogan's Faberge is deliberately hushed up. And it is this fact that is most dangerous for Russia.

Today we cannot squeeze the Turks out of Azerbaijan simply because Azerbaijan is an independent country and has the right to invite anyone to us. It must be admitted that the Turks are there for a long time.

Turkey's assistance in organizing the production of drones in Ukraine is already a fact. Arms supplies too. Hence (according to the experience of Karabakh), today there are Turkish operators in the Armed Forces of Ukraine who train Ukrainians. Consequently, at the beginning of active hostilities, the Turks will definitely participate in these battles, at least as instructors. That is, Turkey will become a party to the conflict.

Moldova, with the support of Romania and Ukraine, will tighten the blockade of Transnistria. At the same time, it is quite possible that after the outbreak of hostilities in the Donbass, hostilities will begin in Tiraspol. Here Romania and its army will become an assistant. The threat to Russian peacekeepers will increase many times over.

And not because the group will not be able to respond adequately to the blow. Just one projectile that arrives at the arsenal, guarded by the Russians, will cause an explosion with a force of up to 10 megatons! This will practically sweep away not only half of Moldova, but also part of Ukraine. Let me remind you that the distance to the Ukrainian border is only 7 kilometers.

What will Russia do in these conditions? It's understandable in Donbass. The Ukrainian Armed Forces will simply be destroyed not by ground forces, but by the strikes of the Aerospace Forces and missile weapons. A similar scenario awaits the Ukrainian units in the west. We will simply need a land and air corridor in Transnistria.

Turkey to neutralize Russian fleet will close the straits. And this will be the beginning of the end of the whole campaign. The Russian army will seize control of the straits and take Istanbul. Thus, we will fully establish control over the Black Sea.

Why will the Americans try not to interfere in the regional conflict? Namely, this will be announced officially. The answer lies in the existence of Israel. Those who are interested in the situation with nuclear development in this region understand that on the verge of creating a nuclear weapons there is not only Iran, but also Turkey. Which is equally dangerous for Israel.

The question arises about NATO. Will the alliance not intervene in the war? As previous events have shown, the Europeans do not want to fight Russia at all. And, it seems to me, the issue will be resolved at separate negotiations between Russia, Germany (which again refers us to Zhirinovsky's recent speech), France, the United States and Great Britain. Which will take place, perhaps even during the conduct of hostilities.

The essence of the negotiations will be the same - the next division of spheres of influence between the countries in this region. Simply put, the strong will divide the weak. Who will be a friend to whom until the next war.

The Old New Thing


I think those who really wanted to learn about strategic planning of global operations are now very upset. The author does not classify himself as science fiction writers or writers. An old plot was taken and transferred to modern times. What you read above is a real development of the General Staff of the Russian Empire and the General Staffs of European countries during the First World War. Moreover, this is a fully developed, agreed with the allies and adopted plan of military operations, which was to be carried out by Russia.

The plan remained in the archives of the military department simply because the 1917 revolution completely mixed the cards of the Entente and transferred Russia from the category of winners in the First World War to the category of the defeated ...

This plan was laid out in two secret treaties. A lot of material can be found about these agreements today. First of all, this is the agreement of March 18, 1915. According to this agreement, Russia received the Black Sea straits, Constantinople and the lands around the straits and the city for perpetual use. The British and French received land in the Asian part of the Ottoman Empire.

The second was the Sykes-Picot Treaty of May 16, 1916. In principle, this treaty confirmed the partition of the Ottoman Empire, already adopted in the first agreement, and extended to vast territories that have now become independent states. However, there is one caveat. When the Italians learned about the secret treaty, they demanded their share. And then the British were forced to give the Italians part of their piece of the pie.

Only those who are not going to live on do not make plans


It goes without saying that most of the strategic plans remain plans. Moreover, only a few initiates know about their existence. In particular, the existence of the treaties that I wrote about above became known only because the Bolsheviks, having seized power, published them. For what it was done I will not understand.

The scandal that these materials caused in world politics then speaks for itself. In many ways, it was this scandal that subsequently cost us decent money when establishing economic ties with European countries. And for a long time he brought our diplomacy out of the system of separate negotiations, with the exception of Germany.

It is clear that some plans still exist today. It is also obvious that not everything that presidents, foreign and defense ministers talk about behind closed doors becomes known even after a long time. We, ordinary people, have to learn about these plans only in the process of their implementation.

But the main thing is that there are strategic plans.
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    2 December 2020 04: 58
    I am perplexed in every sense about my knowledge gap ...

    How did that happen what that a gap the size of the universe has formed in them? How did the existence of such epoch-making treaties of the WWI period, which radically change the meaning of RI's participation in the war, "eluded" me?

    The Old New Thing

    I think those who really wanted to learn about strategic planning of global operations are now very upset. The author does not classify himself as science fiction writers or writers. An old plot was taken and transferred to modern times. What you read above is a real development of the General Staff of the Russian Empire and the General Staffs of European countries during the First World War. Moreover, this is a fully developed, agreed with the allies and adopted plan of military operations, which was to be carried out by Russia.

    The plan remained in the archives of the military department simply because the 1917 revolution completely mixed the cards of the Entente and transferred Russia from the category of winners in the First World War to the category of the defeated ...

    This plan was laid out in two secret treaties. A lot of material can be found about these agreements today. First of all, this is the agreement of March 18, 1915. According to this agreement, Russia received the Black Sea straits, Constantinople and the lands around the straits and the city for perpetual use. The British and French received land in the Asian part of the Ottoman Empire.

    The second was the Sykes-Picot Treaty of May 16, 1916. In principle, this treaty confirmed the division of the Ottoman Empire, already adopted in the first agreement, and extended to vast territories that have now become independent states.


    As for the projection of events more than a century ago on the current geopolitical situation, I would like to object to the author that something has changed in the world since then.
    At least - there is no Entente and Great Britain and France are not our ally, not even to mention the United States ...
    1. +2
      2 December 2020 07: 02
      ... Turkey's assistance in organizing the production of drones in Ukraine is already a fact. Arms supplies too.

      ... And again Russia is silent.

      I am amazed at Erdogan's impudence! This friend calmly supplies weapons that will be used against Donbass (and therefore against Russia), climbed into Karabakh ... He actively participates in all conflicts along the perimeter of Russia on the opposite side.

      And our political leadership is trying to represent his bosom friend. And he does not dare to answer at least symmetrically - to engage in the same supply of weapons to the Kurds.
      1. -13
        2 December 2020 09: 26
        Quote: Stas157
        I am amazed at Erdogan's impudence!

        There is no need to interfere with Erdogan - he will ruin Turkey, and the Anatolian Federal District will be a part of Russia since He will ask for it himself and the Black Sea will again become the Russian Sea with our straits into the Mediterranean Sea.
        1. 0
          2 December 2020 21: 58
          Quote: Boris55
          and the Anatolian Federal District will be part of Russia

          Yeah, no need to rename, they will call Anatolian in honor of Chubais.
      2. 0
        2 December 2020 12: 35
        The Americans help the Kurds, they can't help them.
    2. +1
      3 December 2020 00: 16
      It does not prevent the people from reading some of the thoughts of King Solomon. For me, his main statement: what is now was before us and will be after us. And Lomonosov said: everything does not appear from anywhere and does not disappear anywhere.
    3. 0
      3 December 2020 11: 26
      "And not because the group will not be able to respond adequately to the blow. It's just that one projectile that arrives at the arsenal guarded by the Russians will cause an explosion with a force of up to 10 megatons!" well, this is outright nonsense. Otherwise I agree
  2. KCA
    +4
    2 December 2020 05: 11
    There will be no war with Turkey, Ukraine or Moldova, everyone understands how it will end for each participant, all our non-friends will walk on a thin one, but not cross it, fiddle over a small one, Karabakh is an example of this, there is no doubt that Azerbaijan is with with the help of Turkey, I would have taken Karabakh completely and crushed Armenia with minimal losses for itself, but stopped, if someone needs direct military intervention, only a country overseas, but to enter into a fight with a bear is too much, you can tease, but stop in time
    1. +1
      2 December 2020 09: 06
      You are undoubtedly right that they will "tinker" (a wonderful name for the policy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the limitrophes), but it is possible that many want wars between Russia and Turkey. In this sense, the aggressiveness of Turkey is very similar to the aggressiveness of Japan in 1937 against China, and it was then that the collective West tried to incite the USSR against the samurai. Another thing is that Erdogan and Putin can pretend that they are ready for a fight and, under this sauce, resolve their issues - on the one hand, the Kurds, Syria, on the other, Ukraine and Transnistria.
    2. BAI
      0
      2 December 2020 09: 40
      There will be no war with Turkey, Ukraine or Moldova,

      There will be no war, as in Chechnya, in Georgia. There will be some kind of operation to prevent genocide of civilians or a humanitarian catastrophe. With the subsequent enforcement of peace. Even diplomatic relations with these countries will continue. And Russian tourists will stay in them if local nationalists don't kill them.
      What measures could have been taken against Turkey (after the plane was shot down), when tens of thousands of tourists with their families were sitting there with the words "Don't give a damn about everything"? And now it will be so. Nobody will sacrifice their interests and will not cancel paid trips.
  3. +16
    2 December 2020 05: 33
    But, some time passes and this chorus starts a completely different song. Oh, what a turn of events. Oh, what an interesting and unexpected solution. Wow, how great is the leader who found him and accepted him. And this despite the fact that most people know the already sore adage about a good impromptu, which was prepared at home
    I understand correctly that the meaning of the article is as follows: our irreplaceable resident at the moment, sitting in a bunker, is developing a strategy for 70-100 years, unceasingly riveting new impromptu under it, so that in 70-100 years Russians would shout in chorus with surprise: “Wow how great was that leader! "?
    Let me remind you that after the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks discovered analytical materials of the General Staff of the army of the Russian Empire with a prospect of 70-100 years. Materials that were not just projects, but well-developed strategic operations in the event of such an international situation
    What kind of "just such" international situation? Did the General Staff foresee an intervention against the young Soviet republic? Or maybe he planned the revolution? In military affairs, any kind of planning for 70 years is just projection, not planning, because it is not known what kind of "death star" scientists will invent in 20 years, not to mention the longer term.
    What will Russia do in these conditions?
    And then the author's imagination leapt! No, well, what about limiting yourself?
    But the main thing is that there are strategic plans
    Of course have. We even have a HSP. The planning results, however, are increasingly negative (to put it mildly). So the planners definitely need to be changed, otherwise we will lose even the little that remains.
    1. +4
      2 December 2020 07: 49
      After a humble phrase:
      I get a lot of questions about the situation in Donbass, about Moldova's new approach to Russian peacekeepers in Transnistria, about the deployment of Turkish units in Azerbaijan
      I also understood
      where the legs grow from
      Therefore, I began to read further diagonally))) smile
    2. +4
      2 December 2020 08: 44
      The planning results, however, are increasingly negative ..

      Yeah ... 100 years ahead ... Even the war with Japan in 1905 could not be predicted, could not be modeled on the way ...
      There are strategic interests of the country that must be pursued at any time. You can plan for 20-30 years ahead (economy, army, education ...), but plans for 100 years ahead, excuse me, are heresy ...
      1. +2
        2 December 2020 09: 41
        Quote: Doccor18
        The planning results, however, are increasingly negative ..

        Yeah ... 100 years ahead ... Even the war with Japan in 1905 could not be predicted, could not be modeled on the way ...
        There are strategic interests of the country that must be pursued at any time. You can plan for 20-30 years ahead (economy, army, education ...), but plans for 100 years ahead, excuse me, are heresy ...

        I think the plans themselves can exist for 20, 30 and 100 years, subject to constant revision and updating ... it is a well-known fact that everyone has them ... it is well known about the "color" plans of the United States of the 30s, when as opponents Canada and Britain were considered .. but the actions of Russia, according to the author's version, are nonsense ... all the accommodations of peacekeepers, discounts on gas, the accumulation of debts, and so on are just creating leverage. They are needed as a trump card in the sleeve when implementing the plan ... with the same Karabakh - I think even the contingent in Armenia had the opportunity to put on the MC bandages and stand on the line of demarcation in a day, but this had to be coordinated with Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey ... and until everyone gave the go-ahead, no one brought in peacekeepers ...
        Sometimes such trump cards are a medal on two sides - for example, gas discounts ... no one will stop supplies, even if the contract is at the stage of transformation, it is more expensive for himself ... but this is a lever of pressure on the economy, and therefore the head of state ... debts are also a good question, so Ukraine was given a loan before the Maidan, and where is this money now? ...
        there will be no strikes on the Armed Forces either, a new wave of "volunteers" will simply again find a "forgotten" warehouse with anti-tank guided missile systems, anti-tank guided missiles and simple military equipment from the Soviet era, and again "yesterday's miners" will smash the ukrovoyak ... declaration of war under existing agreement ...
        In general, there are plans, resources are allocated for them and the necessary levers are created, the rest is nonsense ...
      2. -10
        2 December 2020 09: 55
        Quote: Doccor18
        but plans for 100 years ahead, sorry, is heresy ...

        Why heresy? There are plans not only for centuries, but also for millennia. The biblical concept of building the World has been going on for about 3 thousand years, the ultimate goal of which is described in the last book of the Bible - the Apocalypse.

        Now we are witnessing the transfer of the power component of managing the World from the United States to China - the coronavirus will help them. The transfer of the management component from England to Iran, but due to Russia's intervention in Syria and the weakness of Iran, is delayed - Turkey is trying to solve its problems for her .. The transfer of the Vatican to Armenia is again delayed due to Russia's interference. The reformatting of Europe, as Obama said that there will be new peoples and states, is again delayed by the growing power of Russia.
        1. 0
          4 December 2020 03: 19
          There's a problem there. China is energetically dependent and they understand this very well. At the moment they are using the latest resources (urbanization, which was done by the USSR in the 30-50s). But the USSR had energy resources. And China does not have them physically (Coal is already depleted), 20 nuclear power plants are riveted, but there is also an ambush (there is too little uranium and it is not controlled by China, they themselves do not have enough), hydroelectric power plants are long and expensive.
          So far, they are pulling out due to green energy and riveting of NPP plus Hydro. But not only is it expensive, but its share cannot be higher than 30% with a unified energy system.
          They no longer have enough Coal (purchased all over the world), oil, gas and soon uranium. At some point, the growth rate will slow down greatly due to the impossibility of further urbanization due to lack of energy resources (there will be enough sophistication for 10 years, and then there will be a stopper due to lack of energy resources.

          At the same time, China will be wildly dependent on sea trade. And it's hard to break it off by taking it into a naval blockade. But it's quite real.
  4. +9
    2 December 2020 05: 35
    Planning is a must. Especially not worth predicting. We look at trends, we turn them into doctrines. "Onslaught from the South", "Onslaught from the East". Now military plans are more like socio-economic analytics. But they only make sense as long as the policy is stable. And if there is an elite that is just waiting to surrender everything as usual "again" after coming to power for the sake of globalization and a piece of sugar on a trained nose, then are these plans necessary at all? The mentality of the people will not immediately generate effective resistance. And here is the "entry" scenario. Without seeing a normal candidate, people simply will not go to the polls and he will come to power through "trained" votes immediately recognized abroad. And then the "creeping" seizure of power and control. And there is no reason for the army and even the police to "show their teeth" by keeping the oath. Because outwardly there will be no "threat". And with people the same way. At first, it seemed like nothing, then it's too late. Well, what are your plans for a hundred years? Again and to this day they are preparing us for partition, genocide and integration. What is it for a hundred years, if the power can be shut down at best for 20.?
  5. +17
    2 December 2020 05: 53
    What kind of war with Turkey? What nafig straits and the storming of Istanbul? What are the attacks of the Aerospace Forces on the APU? Alexander is not a fever for you? We will not be able to pull off a war with Turkey with conventional weapons. The attacks of the Aerospace Forces on the Armed Forces of Ukraine and Russia is turning into an aggressor country with all that it implies, and they expect that we, with shouts of a hurray and a saber on our heads, will climb there up to our ears! That's when Ukraine will definitely get drunk and it's not a fact that we will get something. We will not pull the war with conventional weapons, as we wrote above, because with our "economy" it is meaningless. Yes, our aircraft are capable of fast transient databases, but nothing more. And yes, any plan begins to collapse with the beginning of its implementation.
    1. +1
      2 December 2020 09: 15
      You are right - the ease with which this is stated "... The Russian army will seize control of the straits and take Istanbul. Thus, we will fully establish control over the Black Sea." causes shock. Judging by the simplicity of the formula in Constantinople, the Turks will come out with Russian flags to meet. The truth is not that war is impossible in principle (by the way, this is an objectively erroneous position in life), but that it will proceed in conditions when societies, just like before the start of WWI, will be in illusions about the possibilities of their countries and weaknesses of opponents, which will naturally lead to the fact that all active participants in the clashes will lose, with the exception of the puppeteers.
    2. +3
      2 December 2020 21: 19
      "The Russian army will seize control of the straits and take Istanbul."

      Ostap suffered (C)
  6. +17
    2 December 2020 06: 14
    It's fun to write articles without regaining consciousness
    1. +10
      2 December 2020 07: 21
      - Consciousness is a very tricky subject
      - The money was thrown in and he is gone right away .. laughing
      Life would be boring without Staver's articles. Yes
    2. 0
      2 December 2020 08: 40
      Quote: Cartalon
      It's fun to write articles without regaining consciousness

      Bravo!
  7. +7
    2 December 2020 06: 36
    Yeah ... well, our government has plans. It is known that Zhirinovsky is the "voice" of the irreplaceable. Solving internal problems, due to a small victorious war. At the expense of gas, Ukraine has already been disconnected and paid 3 lard, dollars. Through intermediaries, steel buy the same Russian gas. About the corridor. Apparently, the author sees crowds of Ukrainians who, with a tricolor, joyfully meet the Russian army, and “the enemy runs, runs, runs.” And the fact that several generations brought up in the spirit of Russia as an enemy have grown up there in 30 years is not taken into account. And a very simple question, is there enough weapons and supplies for such a large-scale conflict? Will the industry cope with its replenishment? And the question is with food, will there be a surplus appropriation? Let me remind you that the tsarist government introduced the surplus appropriation system, the temporary continued .. And the most interesting thing is that the CSTO will support Russia? And how will the CIS, the Union State of Russia and Belarus, the EAEU react to this war? BRICS, really without B.?
    1. +1
      3 December 2020 11: 29
      Quote: parusnik
      Yeah ... well, our government has plans

      Do not confuse the plans of the government with those of Staver ... lol
      Even though we have it, but not to the same extent as Staver painted ...
  8. +5
    2 December 2020 06: 36
    The day before yesterday, Vladimir Zhirinovsky perfectly told how events will develop in the event of the outbreak of hostilities. As always, in a rather sharp form, he described the prospects for a future war. One can argue about the details, but (in essence) he is right. Ukraine is being pushed towards disintegration.


    The most controversial place of the respected author. Apart from the authority of "expert" Zhirinovsky, he did not notice any other arguments for the "disintegration" of Ukraine.
    And "the events of the beginning of hostilities" can develop in different ways. No tanks and minefields. Ukraine prepares drones, teaches NATO aviation of different classes to fly. For "Friends of Ukraine", it is enough with a political statement to close the skies over Donbass and back it up with flights of "peacekeepers". And the resistance of the hulls will lose its meaning. Otherwise it will be "Donetsk Mosul".
    The Russian Federation is unlikely to interfere. In the air-missile showdown of recent years, the Russian Federation has been demonstrating Putin's favorite "accuracy": units of aviation are unrequitedly lost. NATO can stock up on a couple dozen "sorry" and "mistakenly shoot down" any number of "North Wind squadrons" with impunity.
  9. +5
    2 December 2020 08: 03
    laughing The ingenious tsarist General Staff, foresaw everything and two revolutions and the creation of the USSR and WWII, the creation of a nuclear bomb and counter-revolutionary events in 1990 and the Crimea and Donbasslaughing The author would like to show that there is a "Great Russia", because the population has so many cars that there are not enough parking lots, and such a country, with a wave of the hand, will solve foreign policy problems without consequences. the role of a picker of crumbs is destined. A simple example is Syria, oil - the United States, Idlib - Turkey, Russia - military bases that are worthless if Turkey closes the straits. The United States and Turkey are members of the NATO bloc.
  10. 0
    2 December 2020 08: 38
    Today it is no longer a secret for anyone that the Ukrainian army is preparing for a large-scale offensive on the LPNR according to the copy of the Azerbaijani army in Nagorno-Karabakh.

    Shaw again ?!
    Isn't this the author who for several years in a row (almost every month) "predicted" the same thing? In general, another order.
  11. +7
    2 December 2020 09: 25
    What kind of war? What kind of Transnistria? What is the collapse of Ukraine ??
    The next Burkhalter will arrive and there will be nothing on our side - the elite will work back to hard-earned citizenship and the location of bank accounts, political scientists and evening M will be saluted. They croak about the violation of the next Minsk agreements and will declare black white.
  12. BAI
    +3
    2 December 2020 09: 29
    1.
    After the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks discovered analytical materials from the General Staff of the Russian Empire's army with a 70-100 year perspective.

    It should be borne in mind that the value of these plans was zero - they did not foresee the revolution.
    2. Now not far gone. in the 2000s, thousandths (until 2010) wrote a program for the development of Russia for 2010-2020. An exemplary hitting the sky with a finger. None of the predictions came true. Crimea and sanctions were not foreseen by anyone, although sanctions should have been. They would have been anyway.
    3. The most successful example of strategic planning:
    Outraged by the German claim to the Spanish crown, Napoleon III stamped his foot out of habit and on July 19 declared war on Prussia. Moltke is said to have been asleep when a telegram with this message was brought to him. When he was awakened, he said, “The campaign plan is in the third drawer of my desk,” and then rolled over and fell asleep again.

    4. Another example of successful planning - General Goth planned the destruction of Soviet armored reserves on July 10-11, 1943 near Prokhorovka in May 1943. This is exactly what happened, which is why the tanks of the 5th GTA ran into the prepared anti-tank defense. The Germans waited for this meeting for 2 months.
    Those. we see that planning for several years or months can be successful, but long-term planning is futile. Too many new ones. unexpected events appears.
    1. BAI
      0
      2 December 2020 09: 44
      PS
      They would have been anyway.

      I meant there would be sanctions.
    2. +2
      2 December 2020 11: 03
      we see that planning for several years or months can be successful, but long-term planning is hopeless. Too many new ones. unexpected events appears.

      even several years or months of planning can be wrong. Even more so for 50 or 100 years. But this does not negate the planning itself. It is necessary to periodically adjust plans depending on the situation, have several options for the development of an event, etc. In China, they plan for 100 years. The United States began supporting Ukrainian nationalism in 1949, and it took off in 1989, 40 years later.
      Therefore, it is necessary to plan, but not as our government plans, but at least as in Soviet times, specific economic plans for 5 years, and long-term plans for 20 years.
      1. BAI
        +3
        2 December 2020 12: 00
        Even more so for 50 or 100 years.

        For 50-100 years, I will be happy to write any forecast (if they pay). In 50 years, neither me nor the customers will be there, there is no one to ask and no one to ask. And at the moment of delivery of the forecast, nothing can be checked. Super lucrative business long term projections. Ostap Bender is resting.
        For the forecast (program) "Russia 2010-2020" Mr. Mau (team leader) received a medal. In 2021.
  13. +8
    2 December 2020 10: 06
    Is that why I love the "Opinions" section? There the Author is not responsible for anything. Like, I have such an opinion and that's it. Do you have something else? Well, sit with him, keep silent to yourself in a rag (today it is very important). laughing

    Analytics is a completely different calico! Here, the Author collected something, somehow processed it - analyzed, that is to say, disassembled it to pieces and gave us a kind of quintessence, information for reflection, etc. True, the Author here, too, does not bear any responsibility for his opuses, but "Analyst "- sounds proudly.

    So, half of the text is a cool, but completely chewable batch. We have read this on VO 100 500 times. Rest alternative history in its purest form. Such things should be provided with a special warning label. Like cigarettes, alcoholic beverages or household chemicals. Bastard Europeans and other "west" are already gluing appropriate stickers on foods high in sugar, fat, salt, warning the consumer about the reduced healthiness.

    The thing is that in present The history of the Sykes-Picot agreement of May 16, 1916 formed the basis for the decisions of the League of Nations according to which France and Britain received mandates on the territories of the former Ottoman Empire on lands that eventually turned into Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, etc., etc. (yes, these are all "remakes"!). But the Anglo-French-Russian agreement of March 18, 1915, according to which Great Britain and France agreed with the transfer of Constantinople with the Black Sea straits to the Russian Empire in exchange for land in the Asian part of the Ottoman Empire, rested in Bose, due to the refusal of the Bolsheviks to fulfill the obligations and agreements of the tsarist and interim governments. Grandfather Lenin signed an appeal to the working Muslims of the East on December 3, 1917, where he divulged the existence of a secret agreement, stating that
    "The secret treaties of the deposed tsar about the capture of Constantinople, confirmed by the deposed Kerensky, are now torn and destroyed"
    About this agreement, 20 years later, Joseph Vissarionovich will remember. He would even begin to negotiate with Hitler's Germany on this matter and would certainly have received the Straits if he had agreed to join the Axis, but ... History does not tolerate the subjunctive mood.

    I am too lazy to sort out peas with lentils, choosing from this mishmash the rest of the stretching and twitching, I will say only a few words about this:
    Those who are interested in the situation with atomic development in this region understand that not only Iran, but also Turkey is on the verge of creating atomic weapons. Which is equally dangerous for Israel.

    After the sale of modern air defense systems to Iran and Turkey, free access to nuclear weapons for Russia's main geopolitical rivals - the reckless ayatollahs and the sultan rushing to create a new empire - became a much greater headache for her than for Israel, alas ...

    That is why not all of the articles in the "Analytics" section are equally useful for the curious reader. hi
    1. BAI
      +2
      2 December 2020 12: 14
      But the Anglo-French-Russian agreement of March 18, 1915, according to which Great Britain and France agreed with the transfer of Constantinople with the Black Sea straits to the Russian Empire in exchange for land in the Asian part of the Ottoman Empire, rested in Bose, due to the refusal of the Bolsheviks to fulfill the obligations and agreements of the tsarist and interim governments.

      Yes, England and France were not going to give the straits to either the Republic of Ingushetia or the Bolsheviks. There are documents on this topic. The Straits are a carrot in front of the Republic of Ingushetia, in order to burden it with the hardships of war more.

      Vasily Strakhov, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor of Moscow State Pedagogical University:
      As for the direct issue of the post-war fate of Constantinople and the Black Sea straits, it was considered by London and Paris, in my deep conviction, as a kind of bait for Russia.
      The choice was quite successful. Since the beginning of the 80s of the XIX century, against the background of the decay of the Ottoman Empire and the deployment of a hidden struggle of the European powers for its future "legacy", the Russian military department was preparing for the occupation of the straits and Constantinople.
      And it is quite understandable that later this particular geopolitical knot became one of the priorities of the foreign policy of tsarist Russia.
      After the brutal defeats of the outbreak of the war in France, it was vital for the Allies to ensure the most active participation of Russia in the struggle against the German bloc. The leaders of the allied powers were aware that sentiments in favor of the empire's withdrawal from the war were growing among part of the Russian elite. By the way, one of the brightest exponents of this opinion was S.Yu. Witte, who, however, suddenly died on February 28, 1915.
      The question of the straits was only part of an extensive effort to "burden" Russia with the main burden of the war. Therefore, they promised a lot. And it is no coincidence that one of the main propagandists of the idea of ​​the "Cross on St. Sophia" was the Anglophile, the leader of the Cadets, Pavel Milyukov.
      At the same time, the allies strongly resisted the conduct of the Bosphorus landing operation by the forces of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. On this occasion, there are many interesting and very indicative facts that reveal the true intentions of the parties.
      The question of the straits and their possible transfer to Russia after the end of the "Great War" is nothing more than an example of a large-scale diplomatic and military-strategic game. It is from such games at the turning points of history that international relations to a large extent consist. ′
      1. +2
        2 December 2020 13: 37
        Quote: BAI
        Yes, England and France were not going to give the straits to either the Republic of Ingushetia or the Bolsheviks. There are documents on this topic.

        Indeed, there are documents. Back in 1917, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Provisional Government P.N.Milyukov received confirmation from the allies, that the terms of the 1915 agreement remain in effect... Then there was the Revolution, everything collapsed.
        Would give, would not give ... These are all just fantasies, like the reasoning of the respected associate professor, beginning with the words: "... in my deep conviction" ... hi
        1. BAI
          0
          2 December 2020 14: 54
          A program on the Zvezda TV channel was devoted to the same topic. And there they showed and read the documents - after the war, Russia did not see anything. In any case, in any mode. Simply, if Russia had agreed to participate in the war, then after the war it would have once again been deceived by the du.roi. And so for the British, everything turned out well - they kept the face and the straits were not given to Russia.
          Do you yourself believe that after so many hundreds of years of sabotage, the British will fight for strategically important straits in order to give them to Russia?
          Let's remember WWII - whoever went where, he kept those territories for himself.
          1. 0
            2 December 2020 15: 22
            Quote: BAI
            A program on the Zvezda TV channel was devoted to the same topic. And there they showed and read the documents - after the war, Russia did not see anything. In any case, in any mode. Simply, if Russia had agreed to participate in the war, then after the war it would have once again been deceived by the du.roi. And so for the British, everything turned out well - they kept the face and the straits were not given to Russia.
            Do you yourself believe that after so many hundreds of years of sabotage, the British will fight for strategically important straits in order to give them to Russia?
            Let's remember WWII - whoever went where, he kept those territories for himself.

            It's not about my "believe-do not believe". I do not watch programs on the Zvezda TV channel. However, I have the full texts of the treaties of both 1915 and 1917. As long as the agreement is not denounced or violated, one should believe in its observance and execution. Everything else, from the evil one. hi
            1. BAI
              +1
              2 December 2020 16: 12
              full texts of treaties and 1915 and 1917.

              But the accompanying documents indicate that Russia's interests will be TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THE CONTRACT CONCLUDED AFTER THE WAR (and it is necessary to fight now and immediately). What would be in this agreement?
              Lord Bertie, British ambassador in Paris, wrote about these agreements in his diary:


              “December 17th. I also talked with Gray about the situation in France, about American mediation, about the future Belgium, about Italy, etc. I pointed out the Russian claims regarding Constantinople and the Straits. Gray said that we must fulfill the promises we made, namely, Russia must receive the right of free passage of its warships from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean and back in peacetime, while the war participants will enjoy equal rights. I noticed that in the case of the withdrawal of the Turks from Constantinople, a situation is created that is completely different from the one in which all these promises were made; that the rights and privileges granted to Russia cannot be denied to Romania, which has a border along the Black Sea, or Bulgaria. The correct solution would be as follows: Constantinople turns into a free city, all the forts on the Dardanelles and the Bosphorus are destroyed, the Suez Canal regime is applied to the Dardanelles and the Bosphorus under a European guarantee. Gray doubts Russia's agreement to such terms. In general, the question of the disposal of Constantinople and the Straits will be a stumbling block when the time comes to discuss such subjects.

              February 22 ... I hope that public opinion in England and abroad will force the powers to reject, in principle, the Russian point of view on the rights of Muscovites regarding Constantinople and the straits between the Black and Mediterranean seas. I am afraid that Gray is not in such a firm position as I would like in this matter; I mean internationalization according to the principles of the Suez Canal regime; this would not satisfy Izvolsky (Russia's ambassador to France - BT) and his host. Our newest and largest vessel, the Queen Elizabeth, in the Dardanelles; we have very large forces there.

              February 26 ... Here, suspicion about Russia's intentions towards Constantinople is growing more and more. They consider it expedient that England and France (in this matter England is placed outside of France) occupied Constantinople before Russia, so that Muscovite would not be able to completely independently decide the question of the future of this city and the straits - the Dardanelles and the Bosphorus. ”

              From the letters of the British ambassador to Russia:
              "... Sir E. Gray hopes that Mr. Sazonov realizes that the government of the E. Vel-va is unable to provide more proof of friendship than that which is given by the content of the aforementioned memorandum. This document testifies to the complete the revolution of the traditional policy of the government of the e. Vel-va and is in direct conflict with the views and feelings that at one time completely dominated in England and have not yet disappeared. Sir E. Gray therefore hopes that the imperial government will recognize that the recent general assurances, the data given to Mr. Sazonov were fulfilled in the most loyal and complete manner. Now, presenting its memorandum, the government of the e. Vel-va believes and hopes that a lasting friendship between Russia and Great Britain will be ensured, as soon as the proposed agreement is reached."

              I am not a politician, and I cannot foresee the moves of the London schemers of the level of GOD. But even I see the simplest solution - after the war, to accompany the transfer of the straits with conditions that are not acceptable for Russia. As a gesture of goodwill, as a sign of love and friendship, as compensation for the death of English soldiers who died during the liberation of the straits - transfer Central Asia to England, since it is much closer to India than to Petersburg (although there is an option at the expense of a free city) ... And who can predict the outcome of such demands? Russia itself abandoned the straits, England is not to blame. Who's to blame?
              By the way, this phrase is quite remarkable:
              This document testifies to the complete overthrow of the traditional policy of the government of e. Vel-va and is in direct contradiction with the views and feelings that at one time completely dominated in England and have not yet disappeared.

              They confirm in plain text that they constantly shit on Russia, and now, in modern terms, "they are changing their shoes in the air."
              1. 0
                2 December 2020 16: 51
                Quote: BAI
                I am not a politician, and I cannot foresee the moves of the London schemers of the level of GOD. But even I see the simplest solution - after the war, to accompany the transfer of the straits with conditions that are not acceptable for Russia.

                Intrigues are woven always and everywhere. At the same time, the contracting parties must not prepare the ground for deception in advance.
                International politics, of course, is not always clean and sometimes smells bad, but it would be absurd to bring it to the level of trust in a drunk neighbor who lends a couple of hundred to pay for a bottle. In fact, the vast majority of treaties and agreements in the world are very strictly enforced.

                Yes, there are violations. So, quite recently by historical standards, right before our very eyes, one state, which until recently guaranteed the territorial integrity of another state, sensing its weakness, at the first opportunity, under the first legitimate pretext in its opinion, takes away decent shmat of the earth, thereby devaluing the price of contracts and agreements with him to the level of the cost of the paper on which these documents are written.
                But such out of the ordinary events are not numerous, and violators lose the trust of the world community for a long time, they rake out sanctions and the next time, before doing something like that, they think carefully whether the game is worth the candle.

                In a word, like this: history researchers operate exceptionally accomplished facts and events. All variations on the theme "and if" are left to specialists of other knowledge profiles, for example, science fiction writers working in the genre of alternative history. They should not be confused with court dishes by order interpreting what happened to please their masters. hi
                1. BAI
                  +1
                  2 December 2020 17: 24
                  As I understand it, everyone will remain unconvinced, we will not further develop this topic. Let's talk about high. For a long time you have not been seen as an author. Do you want to please with anything against the background of Samsonov (I remember that Staver's article is being discussed now)? Quite a lot of events have happened, for example, related to Iran and its nuclear program. At the same time, I am absolutely sure that not everyone will rejoice after seeing the outside view of these events, which differs from the official one. There will be little applause.
                  1. +1
                    2 December 2020 18: 00
                    Quote: BAI
                    As I understand it, everyone will remain unconvinced, we will not further develop this topic. Let's talk about high. For a long time you have not been seen as an author. Do you want to please with anything against the background of Samsonov (I remember that Staver's article is being discussed now)? Quite a lot of events have happened, for example, related to Iran and its nuclear program. At the same time, I am absolutely sure that not everyone will rejoice after seeing the outside view of these events, which differs from the official one. There will be little applause.

                    Okay. We will not develop.
                    In reality, there are not many events. The main thing was that at the time of the US withdrawal from agreements with Iran (since Tehran secretly continued to work on nuclear weapons, hiding data from the world community), the latter somehow "unexpectedly" had enriched uranium many times greater than the agreed amount. By May 20, its reserves were 1571,6 kg. By November 12, there were already more than 2400 kg. The allowed limit for Iran is 202,8 kg.
                    About the naive and frivolous perception of the Russians of these events, I have repeatedly spoken in the comments, but not in the horse feed, alas.

                    Only the lazy does not write about Iran's nuclear program today. Moreover, everything that was known has already been written and the bones were sucked white. I have nothing to add here.
                    Yes, and I practically do not deal with current events, or futuristic forecasts. My destiny History, as I said, is a fait accompli.

                    At the end there is an article about how Hitler's Germany made the USSR an offer to join the Berlin Pact. German-Soviet negotiations on this topic began on November 12, 1940. An interesting historical crossroads. It was then that the USSR demanded the expansion of its sphere of influence to Bulgaria and the creation of Soviet naval bases in the Bosporus and Dardanelles ...
                    1. BAI
                      0
                      2 December 2020 19: 29
                      Germany made the USSR an offer to join the Berlin Pact. German-Soviet negotiations on this topic began on November 12, 1940. An interesting historical crossroads.

                      Yes, recently materials on this topic caught my eye. Really interesting. We wait. I think readers from Bulgaria will join the discussion.
  14. +3
    2 December 2020 10: 18
    Everything is relative. We lost RI in WWI and therefore we got nothing from this "pie". Is it fair? As they say ... I don't think so.
    Mirror example France lost in WW2, but her allies, including us, won. And France got its piece of the "pie". And she sits at the UN, although she lost.
    Hence the conclusion that they are not our allies, they never were and never will be. And all the more, no strategic plans can be made in the hope of allies. For they will throw.
    1. +2
      2 December 2020 11: 25
      A, RI is the winner in WWI and the beneficiary. What is this? Winner? Crumbling fronts, internal discord and vacillation. A compromised court and an inappropriate emperor. And defeat in all directions. Still got off easy, there was a force that stopped the liquidation of Russia as a state.
      1. +1
        2 December 2020 13: 19
        We were in the Entente and our allies won. But we have with that victory, bolt. Although RI did a lot for that victory.
        And take France, complete rout. And as a result, she is in the camp of the winners.
        What's the difference?
        1. -2
          2 December 2020 13: 31
          RI would not have turned out to be the winner, and ANTANTA is not a fact that the Germans would continue to win, with Austria-Hungary to beat our armies. Everything would change.
          It was impossible not to take France as the winner. Firstly, she fought, and secondly, she had to become part of the bourgeois cordon. Only Buddha knows how Stalin would conduct the case. Know that there are no vigorous charges yet. Although, all the same, so the same. Displace them instantly, with their total superiority in SA, the ocean would not work. An attack on Soviet cities was considered unacceptable.
  15. 0
    2 December 2020 10: 54
    I believe that the author is deeply mistaken in choosing a methodology for analyzing the development of situations. The fact is that the input of new situational data will constantly change the entire architecture of events. Therefore, such reasoning corresponds to a certain global arrangement of events and their development. However, it is necessary to understand what new introductory and with what dynamics this or that development of events will develop. In addition, there will be a complex of vectors. That is why I often talk about new principles of work and analysis of information.
  16. 0
    2 December 2020 12: 16
    Not many are now ready to accept the thought that has changed in the world. The dynamics of changing situations, confrontation and, in general, the capacity of events have moved to a new level. Hence the analysis tool should be appropriate. And this should be understood by mathematicians, but unfortunately
  17. +2
    2 December 2020 12: 41
    Author:
    Alexander Staver
    Let's try today to answer these questions from the point of view of strategic planning of political and military actions of our country in the long term. In order for readers to understand this phrase, let me remind you that after the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks discovered analytical materials of the General Staff of the army of the Russian Empire with a prospect of 70-100 years.

    Materials that were not just projects, but well-developed strategic operations in the event of such an international situation. I understand that it looks fantastic. But this is a fact of our history. this is how the General Staff worked in the Russian Empire.

    All those who seriously discuss the prospects for 70-100 years ahead are not even "manilovs", but most likely Kashchenko's veterans who have access to the network.
  18. -2
    2 December 2020 13: 22
    After reading this article, I remembered the mantras of our political instructors in 1940 - we will beat the enemy on its territory. And the German working class, seeing the tanks of the Red Army, will rise up and overthrow the power of the bourgeois and capitalists.
    But I agree with one argument of the author - it is necessary to solve the Transnistrian problem. But Sandra knows no worse than we do the reasons for the withdrawal of our peacekeepers - the consent of Chisinau, Tiraspol and Moscow to this. Will begin to act - by force - will substitute herself. And the fact that she barks there, let her bark .. Next, we'll see ..
  19. Kuz
    +18
    2 December 2020 15: 18
    Is this article meant to unite the nation?
  20. 0
    2 December 2020 16: 01
    Even President Zelenskiy talks about some kind of plan B
    Б Ayden will come Б Ayden will indicate.
  21. +1
    2 December 2020 16: 15
    In such a situation, Zelensky needs to start active hostilities in the Donbass. An external enemy and coffins in Ukrainian cities and villages will unite the nation better than any words.
    "coffins in Ukrainian cities and villages will rally the nation" the only question is against whom will they rally?
    ---
    In this situation, the main thing for Zelensky is to have time to run (swim) to Israel. bully
  22. -1
    2 December 2020 16: 20
    The article is not just normal, but excellent. Not everyone can handle adequate analytics. Staver is a definite plus.
    1. 0
      16 December 2020 17: 57
      Especially about the capture of the straits pleased. Plus yeah.
  23. 0
    2 December 2020 19: 58
    Gas will take up the entire volume supplied to it.
    This is so with Taipych.
    It was indicative with Azerbaijan (Karabakh).
    Stop where "volume" ends.
    It's the same with the Turks.
    Press down to fill the vacuum.
    It's a pity Azerbaijan, which until now
    led an independent policy,
    and now - the limitrophe of Turkey.
  24. +1
    2 December 2020 20: 11
    A crude article, how much money does the site administration pay for such material, who knows? Here, apparently, it's about money, not serious analytics
  25. 0
    3 December 2020 00: 37
    Quote: Stas157
    ... And he does not dare to answer at least symmetrically -

    Set the Azerbaijani business elite of Moscow against the strong, even by Brezhnev standards, embrace of Edogan and Aliyev?
    The guys have a lot of money, connections (it was in vain that the Supreme Commander presented orders to respected Azerbaijanis).
    Let them work out their trust and their monopoles.
    Aliyev cleared Azerbaijan worse than Batka.
    The opposition is all firmly entrenched in Moscow. Sniffing quietly in two holes. They think they will be handed over to Aliyev.
    Let them also work out bread and shelter.
    But there is an opinion that it is too late.
    And soon officials from Istanbul will be brought to Baku.
    Then write wasted!
    To 1 Azerbafdzhans in Moscow will come for permanent residence - God knows how many fellow countrymen.
  26. 0
    3 December 2020 12: 35
    UAVs in Ukraine? Yeah, it remains to understand what kind of shishi.
    1. 0
      3 December 2020 21: 03
      Quote: Victor Sergeev
      it remains to understand what shishi

      Money is not a problem for those who print it. They will print it, and the whole world will pay.
  27. 0
    7 December 2020 00: 31
    the author burned it out.
  28. 0
    12 December 2020 20: 17
    What are you writing about here
    Who will win whom, the wet dreams of the author of the provocateur, for much less we were imposed sanctions
    who will shoot whom? Let's objectively face the truth in Washington, they will squeeze the oligarchs' money and ours will sign any agreement I read the comments I understand there are no literate officers in the country