Military Review

The distance of hitting the target by the missile system "Uran" from the corvette "Aldar Tsydenzhapov"

50

New corvette of the Pacific fleet For the first time, Aldar Tsydenzhapov launched a cruise missile of the Uranus complex. The shooting took place in the Gulf of Peter the Great in the Far East.


This information was provided today by the press service of the Pacific Fleet of the Russian Navy.

The launch of the Uranus rocket is part of the test program of the newest Russian corvette. "Aldar Tsydenzhapov" conducted a series of shooting in the Sea of ​​Japan. In particular, they fired from the A-190 artillery installation, the caliber of which is 100 mm, firing at the naval ship's shield.

The press service of the Pacific Fleet also named the target engagement distance with the Uran missile system from the Aldar Tsydenzhapov corvette:

The cruise missile successfully hit a surface target at a distance of about 40 km from the warship at the set time.

About 10 more warships and vessels of the Pacific Fleet were involved to ensure safety at the site of the shooting and recording the test results. In addition, we decided to connect Aviation Navy.

The corvette "Hero of the Russian Federation Aldar Tsydenzhapov" was laid down at the Amur shipyard in 2015. Since the summer of 2020, the battleship has been undergoing a series of tests.
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. alma
    alma 25 November 2020 12: 54
    +35
    We are looking forward to joining the Pacific Fleet. And then even the Yankees began to confuse the banks.
    1. times
      times 25 November 2020 13: 00
      +38
      The Yankees have long beguiled the shores angry
      1. cniza
        cniza 25 November 2020 13: 55
        +8
        Quote: alma
        We are looking forward to joining the Pacific Fleet. And then even the Yankees began to confuse the banks.


        They lost them.
      2. deniso
        deniso 25 November 2020 14: 11
        +7
        I was late for a day. Yesterday the "target" had already gone home.
        1. Volga073
          Volga073 26 November 2020 08: 23
          +3
          So that's why I hit the road on time))
  2. Avior
    Avior 25 November 2020 12: 56
    +24
    unclear what is the meaning of the title?
    for Uranus, the distance is very small
    1. Xnumx vis
      Xnumx vis 25 November 2020 13: 24
      +9
      Quote: Avior
      unclear what is the meaning of the title?
      for Uranus, the distance is very small

      But now it is clear why the Yankees went there! Banal espionage.
      1. Avior
        Avior 25 November 2020 13: 31
        -5
        Yeah. behind the launch of Uranus at 40 km.
        squander public money smile
    2. Ros 56
      Ros 56 25 November 2020 13: 30
      0
      Or maybe the zero got lost? lol
    3. Lex_is
      Lex_is 25 November 2020 13: 40
      +15
      unclear what is the meaning of the title?

      In attracting the attention of the reader, so that he clicks on the link.
      Clickbait is called.
      Normal media agencies do not allow themselves such nonsense, and such dislocations of the brain are not published, and employees are prohibited.
    4. Hagen
      Hagen 25 November 2020 13: 45
      +6
      Quote: Avior
      unclear what is the meaning of the title?
      for Uranus, the distance is very small

      It's simple. A patriotic public close to maritime affairs should boil from the headline and, by splashing this rage in the comments, set the article on record for some kind of "toilet" book with a rise in the price tag for an advertising space. wassat
  3. credo
    credo 25 November 2020 12: 57
    0
    The cruise missile successfully hit a surface target at a distance of about 40 km from the warship at the set time.

    Let's hope this distance is not its limit.
    1. NDR-791
      NDR-791 25 November 2020 13: 08
      -2
      Let's hope this distance is not its limit.
      Maybe she flew along a given trajectory before hitting another 450 km?
      1. credo
        credo 25 November 2020 13: 12
        +1
        Quote: NDR-791
        Let's hope this distance is not its limit.
        Maybe she flew along a given trajectory before hitting another 450 km?

        Don't scoff, the text clearly says - "... hit a surface target at a distance of about 40 km from the warship."
        1. NDR-791
          NDR-791 25 November 2020 13: 14
          +5
          Not at all!!! Removal and traversed path are different things. Especially in light of our latest controlled and programmable designs.
          1. credo
            credo 25 November 2020 13: 20
            -2
            Quote: NDR-791
            Not at all!!! Removal and traversed path are different things. Especially in light of our latest controlled and programmable designs.


            Let us assume that you are right, while in your opinion the specified sentence from the text of the article should have been written - "... The cruise missile successfully hit the surface target at the specified time at a distance of about 40 km from the warship."
            1. NDR-791
              NDR-791 25 November 2020 13: 26
              +3
              Strange ... I had no complaints about the text of the article. As it is written, so it is already written. I answered your "distance limit hope". I myself will never believe that 40 is the maximum speed. By the way, who is giving you cons, I don't know.
              1. credo
                credo 25 November 2020 13: 40
                0
                Quote: NDR-791
                Strange ... I had no complaints about the text of the article. As it is written, so it is already written. I answered your "distance limit hope". I myself will never believe that 40 is the maximum speed. By the way, who is giving you cons, I don't know.

                It is possible that the disadvantages are put by those who believe that the indicated rocket flew not 40 but 450 km, or maybe those who believe that only enemies can question this statement (not 40 but 450 km). Their right.
                1. Cympak
                  Cympak 25 November 2020 14: 10
                  +3
                  It is useful for you to read this article: https://topwar.ru/177267-o-voennoj-propagande-plohoj-i-horoshej.html
                  Uranus anti-ship missiles do not fly at 450 km. The initial version of the X-35, which is installed on ships, flies only 130 km. An upgraded version of the Kh-35U for 260. But the admirals do not order it for ships, but use it only in the Bal coastal missile systems. The reason for this is not clear and vague, as are many of the decisions of our naval commanders.
                  1. Serg65
                    Serg65 26 November 2020 09: 38
                    +2
                    Quote: Cympak
                    An upgraded version of the Kh-35U for 260. But the admirals do not order it for ships, but use it only in the Bal coastal missile systems. The reason for this is not clear and vague, as are many of the decisions of our naval commanders.

                    Well, if VO and Timokhin and Klimov are solid sources for you, then here ... especially for you ...
                    https://topwar.ru/160051-pkr-h-35u-s-uvelichennoj-vdvoe-dalnostju-poleta-omorjachat.html
                    1. Cympak
                      Cympak 26 November 2020 13: 40
                      0
                      Have you read your link yourself? There is neither Timokhin nor Klimov either in the authors or in the commentators. It quotes the words of Boris Obnosov, general director of the Tactical Missile Armament Corporation:
                      The Kh-35U is available in an aviation version, but we are currently deactivating it. What does it mean? On our ships there are just X-35s. We want to replace them in the same containers with the Kh-35U.

                      News date July 11, 2019. Since then, there has been no news about the adoption of the Kh-35U missile on the ships of the Navy. The work is in progress. We are waiting for their completion, testing and installation of new missiles on ships.
                      The Kh-35U missile has existed for a long time. And why she was not immediately registered on ships is a big question for the fleet.
                      1. Serg65
                        Serg65 26 November 2020 13: 46
                        +2
                        Quote: Cympak
                        It quotes the words of Boris Obnosov, general director of the Tactical Missile Armament Corporation:

                        So you need Timokhin and Klimov or information about the rocket?
                        Quote: Cympak
                        News date July 11, 2019. Since then, there has been no news about the adoption of the Kh-35U missile on the ships of the Navy. The work is in progress.

                        But despite this, you have already made a conclusion ..
                        Quote: Cympak
                        admirals do not order it for ships, but use it only in the Bal coastal missile systems. The reason for this is not clear and vague, as are many of the decisions of our naval commanders.

                        Either the admirals are enemies of the people, or you are waiting for the completion of the work and acceptance into service .... you will decide !!!
                      2. Cympak
                        Cympak 26 November 2020 13: 55
                        +1
                        I have given the publicly available information about the range of the Kh-35 and Kh-35U missiles above. None of them have a range of 450 km. There was no information about the installation of Kh-35U missiles on naval ships in the media. Why the Kh-35U missile was not immediately registered on the ships of the Navy raises questions for me to the leadership of the Navy. If this is a mistake, then as Comrade Stalin aptly said: "Every mistake has a first and last name."
          2. midivan
            midivan 25 November 2020 17: 27
            -1
            Quote: credo
            whereas, in your opinion, the specified sentence from the text of the article should have been written - "... The cruise missile successfully hit the surface target at the specified time at a distance of about 40 km from the battleship."

            Immediately I warn you that I don't understand this, but - the set time for hitting the target, say 13:00, distance 40 km, launch at 12:00 - the missile deviates greatly from the target, "covers up the tracks" and for 40 minutes it is not easy to carry somewhere near the goal, and at a given time - chpok, good afternoon. request not?
            1. Serg65
              Serg65 26 November 2020 09: 40
              +6
              Quote: midivan
              and at a given time - chpok, good afternoon

              hi Welcome laughing
              The distance of 40 km was chosen for testing the firing complex of the new corvette, and not for testing the missile itself .... and that's it!
          3. Serg65
            Serg65 26 November 2020 09: 34
            +3
            Quote: credo
            The cruise missile at the set time successfully hit a surface target at a distance of about 40 km from the warship

            My friend, I do not understand your indignation at all ... experienced what? Rocket or Tsydenzhapov's firing complex?
            Quote: credo
            how in your opinion the specified sentence from the text of the article should have been written

            There ... a little higher is what it says ...
            The launch of the Uranus rocket is part of the test program for the newest Russian corvette. "Aldar Tsydenzhapov"

            Is there somewhere written about the rocket test? Or the fact that this launch was for the prize of the Commander-in-Chief? The missile hits the target from 7 to 260 km ... the target was set at 40 km .... well, to check the Monument too! And that's it !!!!! There was no task to hit the target at maximum range! It will be much later and not in the Petra Bay !!!
        2. Crabong
          Crabong 26 November 2020 23: 12
          0
          Yeah, she first flew around the target for half an hour ...
    2. noname1117
      noname1117 25 November 2020 20: 36
      +7
      Quote: NDR-791
      Let's hope this distance is not its limit.
      Maybe she flew along a given trajectory before hitting another 450 km?

      No one says that this is its limit, the maximum speed of the Kh-35U is 260 km. But they don't shoot at such distances during testing, this is a test of performance, not range. In the Sea of ​​Japan it will hardly be possible to make such a launch into territorial waters.
      1. Serg65
        Serg65 26 November 2020 09: 42
        +2
        Quote: noname1117
        this is a performance test, not a range test. In the Sea of ​​Japan it will hardly be possible to make such a launch into territorial waters.

        Well, at least someone understands what the article is about ...
        good
  4. Hagen
    Hagen 25 November 2020 13: 51
    +8
    Quote: credo
    Let's hope this distance is not its limit.

    The sighting range of the AK-74 is 1000 meters, and targets in the field can be set at 250. So it is here. They shot at part of the possible range, at 40 km. We received the entire set of data on the operation of the ship's firing complex without closing the extra water area. I think the goals and objectives have been solved to the extent required.
    1. credo
      credo 25 November 2020 14: 06
      +2
      Quote: Hagen
      Quote: credo
      Let's hope this distance is not its limit.

      The sighting range of the AK-74 is 1000 meters, and targets in the field can be set at 250. So it is here. They shot at part of the possible range, at 40 km. We received the entire set of data on the operation of the ship's firing complex without closing the extra water area. I think the goals and objectives have been solved to the extent required.

      Yes, everything can be. A short article with a loud headline actually has little useful information.
      Found on some resource information that the RK Uranus began to be created back in the 90s, during the Soviet era. A link is also given to the 3M24 missile, for this complex, the technical characteristics of which are from 5 to 130 km in range. Whether this rocket is in question or about another, there is no data in the article, therefore the benefit from such information is minimal.
      1. Hagen
        Hagen 25 November 2020 14: 10
        +2
        Quote: credo
        A short article with a loud headline actually has little useful information.

        I have already expressed my assumption about the purpose of the article a little earlier. And this is not an attempt to "discover" something for us.
  • Evil 55
    Evil 55 25 November 2020 12: 59
    -26%
    A corvette for the Pacific Fleet, on the coast of the OCEAN ... To jam herring only at the base and drive "double basses" instead of border guards along the coast ..
  • Boa kaa
    Boa kaa 25 November 2020 13: 00
    +28
    Article title
    The distance of hitting the target by the missile system "Uran" from the corvette "Aldar Tsydenzhapov"
    with a claim to some kind of sensation ... However, all expectations descend into the toilet with an unpretentious passage
    The cruise missile successfully hit the surface target at the set time at a distance of about 40 km from the battleship.

    This is, to put it mildly, HALTORA! Well, at least they said that the Uranium Kh-35U is capable of hitting the enemy's NK at a distance of 260+ km, which corresponds to the best foreign tactical complexes of the KR for NK. No. Pissaka grabbed the ticker from Infomix and, without further ado, blinded an ersatz in the best traditions of the yellow press. Creativity - ZERO!
    Not the mind not the heart. Whatever. Ugh! am
    1. Cympak
      Cympak 25 November 2020 14: 11
      +2
      The ships are equipped with X-35s without U, which fly 130 km. Why is this, it is not clear
  • Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 25 November 2020 13: 01
    +2
    It would be necessary to test the long distance! And then for the "Uranus" with the Kh-35U anti-ship missile, 40 km is almost "hand-to-hand"!
    1. Cympak
      Cympak 25 November 2020 14: 12
      +1
      Perhaps the answer lies in the no-navigation zone for missile testing.
      1. Note
        Note 25 November 2020 15: 14
        +2
        Exactly. I’ll even say a little more than I can. The tests were carried out not only and not so much with uranium. And unfortunately, the American managed to do these shooting.
        1. alexmach
          alexmach 25 November 2020 15: 49
          +1
          Exactly. I’ll even say a little more than I can. The tests were carried out not only and not so much with uranium. And unfortunately, the American managed to do these shooting.

          God forbid. But in general, I'm also very interested. I am waiting for messages about the results of shooting with the "Barrier"
  • Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 25 November 2020 13: 12
    +5
    McCain should have checked today freedom of navigation. smile
  • rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 25 November 2020 13: 28
    +2
    The shooting took place in the Peter the Great Gulf in the Far East
    Therefore, the American and hung out in this district. Observation and, along the way, provocation, so that everyone can see, first of all, the allies, as the Americans loudly knock their heels on the chest.
    1. skif8013
      skif8013 25 November 2020 13: 35
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60
      The shooting took place in the Peter the Great Gulf in the Far East
      Therefore, the American and hung out in this district. Observation and, along the way, provocation, so that everyone can see, first of all, the allies, as the Americans loudly knock their heels on the chest.

      DO play and knock on the coffin lid.
    2. cniza
      cniza 25 November 2020 13: 57
      +3
      Naturally he was interested in this, he tried to copy everything, but the poor fellow was kicked out ...
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 25 November 2020 13: 31
    +2
    It's a pity McCain was not accidentally hit. fellow
  • Yuriy71
    Yuriy71 25 November 2020 13: 38
    +5
    The author of the material has lies in the title - is it a method of drawing attention to the article?
  • Igor Borisov_2
    Igor Borisov_2 25 November 2020 13: 51
    +2
    Well, that's what you clung to the author of the article? He didn't write that this is the maximum distance for the Uranus complex, did he? It's just that, as I understand it, this distance was chosen in order to conduct shooting in our territorial waters, without prejudice to international shipping ...
    1. Reiter
      Reiter 26 November 2020 03: 24
      0
      Maybe the range of such a launch is due to the fact that the corvette worked on a target without external target designation? Did you discover it yourself and destroy it yourself?
  • Captain45
    Captain45 25 November 2020 14: 33
    0
    The new corvette of the Pacific Fleet "Aldar Tsydenzhapov" for the first time launched a cruise missile of the "Uranus" complex. The shooting took place in the Gulf of Peter the Great in the Far East.(C)
    So it was necessary to try on "McCain", all the same it was hanging around there idle in the Gulf of Peter and there was no need to disturb the BOD. One rocket and that's it ... we climbed abroad ourselves, and we have, you know, shooting here, we are not to blame!
  • Cyril G ...
    Cyril G ... 25 November 2020 18: 49
    +1
    Since we are doing with the air defense on the corvette - namely, how is it complex Zaslon? And by the way, how much did it cost the treasury?
  • Old26
    Old26 25 November 2020 19: 51
    +1
    Quote: midivan
    Quote: credo
    whereas, in your opinion, the specified sentence from the text of the article should have been written - "... The cruise missile successfully hit the surface target at the specified time at a distance of about 40 km from the battleship."

    Immediately I warn you that I don't understand this, but - the set time for hitting the target, say 13:00, distance 40 km, launch at 12:00 - the missile deviates greatly from the target, "covers up the tracks" and for 40 minutes it is not easy to carry somewhere near the goal, and at a given time - chpok, good afternoon. request not?

    Will her engine run for an hour?