Tu-160 Russian Aerospace Forces showed the ability to "reach" weapons to London in response to the appearance of B-52H over the Black Sea

117

Tu-160 VKS RF


The appearance of American strategic bombers B-52H Stratofortress near the borders of Russia has been happening more and more recently. US Air Force "strategists" are passing in close proximity to the Russian borders over the Baltic, in the Kuril Islands region, recently they were flying to the Crimea, flying over Ukraine. On the eve of the strategic bombers of the American Air Force again approached the borders of the Russian Federation - over the Black Sea.



The peculiarity of the situation, which emerged the day before, is that yesterday Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko arrived in Sochi on a visit. American attack aircraft, which took off from the Fairford airbase in Britain, at one of the stages of their route approached a distance of only a few hundred kilometers to the Sochi residence of the President of Russia "Bocharov Ruchei", where at that moment Vladimir Putin was meeting with his Belarusian counterpart ...

By and large, US Air Force strategic bombers posed a serious threat over the Black Sea. And their very appearance in this region looks like a real provocation.


It is noteworthy that for a kind of restoration of aviation parity on the same day, strategic missile carriers Tu-160 of the Russian Aerospace Forces were raised into the air. Russian "strategists" who were escorted by MiG-31 naval interceptor fighters on certain sections of the route aviation Russian Navy, headed for the North Atlantic. Norwegian Air Force fighters were forced to take off on the course to escort them.

Information resource "The reporter", linking the appearance of the B-52H over the Black Sea and the flight of the Tu-160 over the North Atlantic, writes that Russian strategic bombers, in fact, demonstrated to Washington and London their readiness to respond to the threat posed to the Russian leader by the US Air Force. The fact is that a pair of Tu-160s approached such a distance to the British Isles, which allowed them to "reach" with their weapons both to the said Fairford airbase in Gloucestershire, and to London - with its residences of the royal person and the Prime Minister.


This is an eloquent hint from Russia that continues to view the world as unipolar that they are wrong.

Video of the interception of a B-52H Stratofortress over the Black Sea (Russian Ministry of Defense):

117 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +19
    15 September 2020 18: 38
    Well done videoconferencing. The answer should be symmetrical. We are peaceful people, but our armored train is on a siding.
    1. +16
      15 September 2020 19: 09
      Quote: GREG68
      The answer must be symmetrical

      It is possible and asymmetrical, but upward laughing
      1. +4
        15 September 2020 19: 16
        You can and so colleague laughing
      2. +1
        15 September 2020 19: 57
        it is necessary to equip the Tu160 with depth charges - to tear off the transatlantic cables
        1. +2
          15 September 2020 20: 01
          Quote: antivirus
          Tu160 must be equipped with depth charges -

          And what swims will not cope with it? belay
          1. +3
            15 September 2020 20: 01
            to overtake blizzards - into all holes, and from all cracks
            1. +4
              15 September 2020 20: 07
              Well yes. You can make a taxi from a road roller.
              Safety 100%
              1. 0
                16 September 2020 08: 02
                Quote: Lipchanin
                Well yes. You can make a taxi from a road roller.
                Safety 100%

                I disagree)
          2. +5
            15 September 2020 20: 41
            Quote: Lipchanin
            And what swims will not cope with it?

            That which FLOATS will definitely not cope. laughing
        2. -28
          15 September 2020 20: 08
          Quote: antivirus
          it is necessary to equip the Tu160 with depth charges - to tear off the transatlantic cables


          Have you ever seen the number of transatlantic cables?

          Do you understand that their real location is a state secret?

          Do you understand that none of our bomber will ever reach the point of dropping brute bombs over transatlantic cables?


          Although, what am I asking ...
          You are with a hat, you don't need a head ...
          You just eat into it.

          There is no need to think.
          1. 0
            15 September 2020 20: 24
            and walk ... under water ... a drone? Only is it necessary?
          2. -3
            15 September 2020 20: 50
            Although, what am I asking ...
            You are with a hat, you don't need a head.

            to tie depth charges to TU160 missiles - that's the solution
            save - fasten with ordinary tape
          3. +6
            15 September 2020 21: 20
            Your bomber will never really reach, because ycpa doesn't have them
          4. +2
            16 September 2020 01: 34
            -We rent !!!!
      3. +5
        15 September 2020 21: 17
        Expensive, however. In the 60s, the staff constantly kept the B-52 squadron in the air, I don't know what modification and how many. But, presumably, not 2-3 cars. We started from the British Isles, from Italy, and it seems from Spain too. The targets for the attack were designated, and the crews during the flight waited for the order to be canceled, not the order to attack. The cancellation invariably came when the squadron approached the borders of the ATS countries, and the squadron turned around, but the next one rose into the air and took the same course. I'm not sure if there were still small pauses - after all, more than half a century has passed since I read this.

        I do not know exactly how long this Murleson ballet lasted, but the pleasure, undoubtedly, is very expensive for the performers, although, of course, our air defense kept in suspense. They wrote about this in the multi-page newspaper "Za rubezhom", which, I believe, had a circulation of several tens of thousands of copies. The subscription to it seemed to be unlimited. In the central press - no gu-gu. They knew who read "Abroad"; if they read it carefully enough, they did not advertise much. Small such notes are rare. But the general public was, in general, not in the know. That's when four A-bombs somehow fell into the sea near some Spanish cape - they wrote more about this, it seems, in Pravda. Like, the American ambassador bathed there - and what did he want to prove with this, I wonder? Like 1967.

        I remember that I was a friend (?) Of an Armenian advanced in various political issues, who lived on the floor above - we were 12-13 years old. In particular, a friend (?) Was aware of the Western interpretation of the Katyn issue, and we, in general, did not know such words, and his dad worked for him at the Foreign Ministry. Since his apartment was much better than that of the first secretary of the embassy in Delhi, who also lived on the floor above, I believe in a considerable position. A friend (?) Did not believe me, and crawled into the bottle that I was generally a well-known writer, but dad, who, as usual, was nearby to observe our activities, especially playing chess, and adjust opinions, confirmed, that this is the true truth (not about the ambassador's bathing, which did not raise any doubts, even a photo of a type who just got out of the water in family shorts appeared somewhere, but about the B-52 squadrons).
        1. +1
          16 September 2020 00: 07
          At least in the late 70s, I bought "Abroad" at an ordinary newsstand .. The newspaper was just a digest of Western publications, nothing secret. It is widely known about the B-52 flights with nuclear weapons in the late 50s - 60s, after the ICBM was put on alert, this sadomasochism ceased.
      4. -1
        16 September 2020 08: 51
        They are destroying Putin and Lukashenka with missiles .. we, in response, are the residences of the Anglican monarchs and prime ministers .. and something else to the heap ..
        I think many in the world would support this option ..))
    2. +4
      15 September 2020 19: 34
      Quote: GREG68
      Well done videoconferencing. The answer should be symmetrical.

      Absolutely agree! Everything should look like a carousel! Only the minke whales took a course in our direction, on the other hand, ours are doing a similar maneuver in their direction, to balance. Although I actively dislike these games! soldier
      1. -9
        15 September 2020 20: 00
        Quote: businessv
        Quote: GREG68
        Well done videoconferencing. The answer should be symmetrical.

        Absolutely agree! Everything should look like a carousel! Only the minke whales took a course in our direction, on the other hand, ours are doing a similar maneuver in their direction, to balance. Although I actively dislike these games! soldier


        Americans on the one hand ...

        And we are in the direction of the British ...


        So why not toward the Americans themselves?
        Where are the flights to Miami, Seattle, Los Angeles?

        Where are the real flights, and not the scruffy flights around Chukotka with the news that they flew near America ...
        Empty in the military-industrial sense, Alaska, and continental America, where the entire military-industrial complex - there is no difference?
        Nobody sees this monstrous lie?

        ...
        Soon our Urya patriots will rejoice in flying along their borders ...
        Although they are already happy (example, flying around Chukotka) ...
        1. -12
          15 September 2020 20: 09
          oh ... minus flew ...
          Zashkvarny urya-patriots began to be celebrated ...
          let's move on ...
          Recalculation ...
        2. -1
          15 September 2020 20: 09
          Quote: SovAr238A
          Where are the flights to Miami, Seattle, Los Angeles?

          Do you know how much it will cost?
          To spend money on these cheap show-off?
          What's the point? Who are we going to scare? All air defense aviation will be nearby
          1. +6
            15 September 2020 20: 14
            Quote: Lipchanin
            Quote: SovAr238A
            Where are the flights to Miami, Seattle, Los Angeles?

            Do you know how much it will cost?
            To spend money on these cheap show-off?
            What's the point? Who are we going to scare? All air defense aviation will be nearby

            some show-offs make sense.
            But flying to Venezuela is an expensive show-off and, in comparison to flights near the borders of America, have an incomprehensible benefit.
          2. -5
            15 September 2020 20: 15
            Quote: Lipchanin
            Quote: SovAr238A
            Where are the flights to Miami, Seattle, Los Angeles?

            Do you know how much it will cost?
            To spend money on these cheap show-off?
            What's the point? Who are we going to scare? All air defense aviation will be nearby


            Well, they fly from Missouri to us on the Barents Sea ...

            And they don't consider it cheap show-off ..
            This is how they prepare pilots for real combat missions.
            For many hours of flights.
            For refueling in the air at any time of the day.
            And they "scare" us - since we raise our fighters if we can?


            And when the last time they flew to Kotelnichy, there was no news about the fighters ...
            Have you noticed this?
            not?
            and what does this mean?

            When our planes supposedly accompany everyone, everyone, everyone ...
            And then the four B-1B flew to Kotelnichy - and no news ...
            And we have there, according to reports, a seized airfield and an arctic base Trefoil ...

            And no air defense fighters ...

            Shit? Is that correct to call it?

            Or can you say otherwise?

            Ponty is to meet an enemy supersonic bomber, and even in the amount of c4 pieces ...

            And meeting Orion is not a show-off ...


            Your duplicity, Uryakav's, is already ridiculous ...
        3. +1
          15 September 2020 21: 45
          Quote: SovAr238A
          So why not toward the Americans themselves?
          Where are the flights to Miami, Seattle, Los Angeles?
          Yes, that's what I meant when I talked about the carousel. Completely mirror action. The fact is that in this case the minke whales started from the naglia, so it is quite symmetrical for itself - to show how it threatens those who provided the airport for the action.
        4. +4
          15 September 2020 21: 49
          Quote: SovAr238A
          Nobody sees this monstrous lie?


          Someone pooped in your brain. fool Or you are simply illiterate.
          Bombers from Anadyr, and there we have a jump airfield, do not fly to Alaska. After takeoff, they go southeast and sometimes descend to the parallel of Los Angeles, being at the launch range of the KR. And Alaska shines because the Raptors from Elmendorf are trying to intercept first. Then from San Diego.

          So why not toward the Americans themselves?

          They fly. It's just that few people are interested in the news from the Far East. And Tu-95s are already flying normally. Recently, they flew in a group with cover from Kamchatka MiG-31s.
          1. 0
            16 September 2020 01: 25
            cover for the MiG-31 here are not cheap show-offs
            1. +3
              16 September 2020 07: 57
              Alas, it is so, but I suppose they worked to distract Elmendorf's attention. Of course we worked with refuellers
              1. -2
                16 September 2020 11: 32
                Quote: Cyril G ...
                Of course we worked with refuellers

                What for? There will be more than enough fuel in the aircraft tanks to reach England and back.
                1. +3
                  16 September 2020 12: 16
                  I'm talking about flying to the east coast of the USA
                  1. 0
                    16 September 2020 13: 04
                    Quote: Cyril G ...
                    I'm talking about flying to the east coast of the USA

                    But, the article is about the flight to England.
        5. +3
          15 September 2020 21: 52
          Americans on the one hand ...

          And we are in the direction of the British ...


          So why not toward the Americans themselves?

          You have already been told - we will hit the decision-making centers wherever they are. That is, to eliminate the customer in the first place, not the contractor.
        6. +2
          15 September 2020 22: 38
          And why the new X-102 missiles with nuclear warheads do not suit you on our Tu-160 and Tu-95, they have a range of 5000 km (or maybe more)
          Distance from Alaska to Washington. The distance between Alaska and Washington DC is 5 kilometers, or 356 miles in a straight line.
      2. -1
        16 September 2020 00: 27
        The B-52 is still junk, and the Tu-160, albeit newer, is morally outdated even before its first flight, in the event of an aggravation of the situation, it is unlikely to fly past Norway. The Yankees, with their flights, provide moral support to the Ukrainians, probably something like - in the event of an aggravation of the situation in Ukraine, the B-52s may well strike at the advancing troops of the LPNR. In our country - well, I don’t know, in theory the Tu-160 should threaten North America, and the Tu-22M should fly to Britain, threaten Britain with its Kh-32s, but they seem to have a small range.
        1. +2
          16 September 2020 08: 01
          Quote: Sergey Sfyedu
          Tu-22M should fly, g

          I suppose the technical readiness level of the Tu-22 is lower than the Tu-95. Although this is exactly that level of speculation.
    3. +2
      15 September 2020 20: 57
      Quote: GREG68
      The answer should be symmetrical.

      A symmetrical answer is not always good.
      In sports, for example, you cannot win with symmetrical answers. In soccer-hockey, for example, the symmetrical answer is a draw. In boxing, the asymmetrical answer is knockout.

      And in life the same way. Major Zolotnitsky taught us that we had to hit so that the enemy would not rise. It will rise - here it is, the symmetrical answer - start all over again.

      American bombers need to respond asymmetrically so that even the thought does not arise once again to provoke. And so - they flew, we flew ... As in the famous film - "There is movement, there is no progress."
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +7
    15 September 2020 18: 53
    The male organ reaches out to the female, if allowed! And here it was clearly indicated that England, if anything, would become for the archaeologists of the future indisputable proof of the existence of Atlantis ... laughing
    1. +1
      15 September 2020 19: 23
      Quote: Finches
      for the archaeologists of the future, an indisputable proof of the existence of Atlantis.

      It's even interesting what the name of the profession is that studies the history of the sea day. But the chairman of the Russian Geographical Society (Sergey Kuzhegetovich), can prove the origin of Atlantis quite exhaustively
  7. 0
    15 September 2020 19: 05
    Is it possible to organize at least twenty flights during the day (purely theoretically)? In addition, something must be done so that neither the Norwegians nor the aircraft carriers would meet them "around the corner". By the way, was there an electronic reconnaissance plane near Scotland?
    1. +9
      15 September 2020 19: 14
      Quote: iouris
      Is it possible to organize at least twenty flights during the day (purely theoretically)?

      What for? It is much more reasonable to organize a constant watch of a pair of our strategic bombers with cruise missiles on board at the positions from which the missiles will reach the territory of the United States and especially densely populated areas. This will immediately cool the ardor of the Yankees - this was already the case during the Soviet era, their reaction to such an event is always predictable.
      1. 0
        15 September 2020 19: 37
        Quote: ccsr
        This will immediately cool the ardor of the Yankees - this was already the case during the Soviet era, their reaction to such an event is always predictable.
        I think they will do this too, but after the appropriate expression of concern and the appropriate sighs on our part.
        1. +2
          15 September 2020 20: 00
          Quote: businessv
          Quote: ccsr
          This will immediately cool the ardor of the Yankees - this was already the case during the Soviet era, their reaction to such an event is always predictable.
          I think they will do this too, but after the appropriate expression of concern and the appropriate sighs on our part.

          At first I also thought that it was endurance and iron nerves, but the further these sighs ..., the more doubts about the adequacy winked
      2. -7
        15 September 2020 20: 02
        Quote: ccsr
        Quote: iouris
        Is it possible to organize at least twenty flights during the day (purely theoretically)?

        What for? It is much more reasonable to organize a constant watch of a pair of our strategic bombers with cruise missiles on board at the positions from which the missiles will reach the territory of the United States and especially densely populated areas. This will immediately cool the ardor of the Yankees - this was already the case during the Soviet era, their reaction to such an event is always predictable.


        Do you remember B-52 flights around the clock hung over Europe in the amount of 10 pieces?
        One even lost a bomb in the Bay of Biscay.
        Nuclear by the way ...


        Do you really think that they did not surpass us in everything in those years ...
        And if we had a pair, they had 5 pairs ...

        Learn materiel and read real military literature.
        1. +3
          15 September 2020 21: 26
          Dear, as far as I remember, we even have different doctrines, they have to attack, we have to defend. Who loses more, the one who attacks or defends? You have some evil arguments, like you say it right and no. Well, think globally, because not everything is so simple, for example, where are you denying the economy? From her harm will be more terrible. Does the USSR remind you of anything? It is necessary to measure it. We have different thinking and capabilities. The fact that the information war is losing a lot, yes, the rest is not so unambiguous. You have to believe in your country, if it is yours! No matter how difficult it was. After all, our grandfathers believed in 1914 and 1941!
        2. -2
          15 September 2020 21: 55
          Do you really think that they did not surpass us in everything in those years ...
          And if we had a pair, they had 5 pairs ...

          No, they did not surpass)))
        3. +1
          16 September 2020 00: 38
          SovAr238A (Al)
          How many times have you gathered to die?
        4. -1
          16 September 2020 11: 52
          Quote: SovAr238A
          Do you remember B-52 flights around the clock hung over Europe in the amount of 10 pieces?

          No, I don't remember - in the second half of the 80s this was not the case, that's for sure.
          Quote: SovAr238A
          One even lost a bomb in the Bay of Biscay.
          Nuclear by the way ...

          That was in the sixties - so what? These planes had to first enter our air defense zone with such bombs, so one should not confuse the time with the present, when cruise missiles can fly 5 thousand km. and our bombers are out of reach of their fighters.
          Quote: SovAr238A
          And if we had a pair, they had 5 pairs ...
          Do not fantasize, because five pairs could not hang, because US strategic aviation even during the Cold War was based on their territory, and this would be too costly for peacetime. Educate yourself as it really was:


          Quote: SovAr238A
          Learn materiel and read real military literature.

          Thank you, I will take into account your wishes, only you have never seen such literature in your eyes, that's why you are babbling.
      3. -2
        15 September 2020 20: 28
        Quote: ccsr
        Quote: iouris
        Is it possible to organize at least twenty flights during the day (purely theoretically)?

        What for? It is much more reasonable to organize a constant watch of a pair of our strategic bombers with cruise missiles on board at the positions from which the missiles will reach the territory of the United States and especially densely populated areas. This will immediately cool the ardor of the Yankees - this was already the case during the Soviet era, their reaction to such an event is always predictable.

        Dear, well, you are smart people, well, think for a minute, what it will be. The Russian Federation has as many as 16 such devices today. Almost all of them are overhauled. How long will they last for such flights?
        1. +5
          15 September 2020 23: 10
          Dear, why don't you traditionally try to think? Just for a second. There are 52 strategic bombers B-70 in the United States, the newest one is 58 years old. This is about your insinuations about overhauls. Another 61 B-1 and 19 B-2. All of them carry, at best, JASSM from a Passage of up to 900 km. A total of 150 sides, which are carried by missiles with the maximum ability to fly 900-950 km.
          We have 95 Tu-60 strategic bombers. We have 16 Tu-16s. A total of 76 strategic bombers, which are focused on strategic missile launchers with a launch capacity of up to 2500 (X-55) and 5000 (X-101) km ... Nobody will ever keep bombers in the air if there is a Strategic Missile Forces. It is enough that at bases such as Anadyr or Severomorsk, detachments of 2 sides were on duty at BG No. 3.
          1. +2
            16 September 2020 12: 05
            Quote: Cyril G ...
            Dear, why don't you traditionally try to think? Just for a second.

            Privalov does not have time for this, because his main goal is to prove that the smartest people on earth are Jews, and the smartest Jews live in Israel, which is why there can be nothing good in Russia without them. In general, he is still the one who is empty-headed, and the main thing for him is to crow, but how everything really is, he does not even know close. He does not even understand that our current class of cruise missiles generally allows our aviation to strike at US territory while remaining out of the reach of their air defense systems. And the capabilities of the Tu-95 are in the air for a long time, of higher priority than the speed of the Tu-160 in this situation.
            Quote: Cyril G ...
            No one will ever keep bombers in the air if there is a Strategic Missile Forces. It is enough that at bases such as Anadyr or Severomorsk, detachments of 2 sides were on duty at BG No. 3.

            Quite right. Well, if the Americans are very cocky, then a pair of Tu-95s, constantly on duty, will quickly cool their ardor, as soon as they enter strike positions that will be outside the zone of the American air defense.
        2. AML
          +2
          15 September 2020 23: 25
          One will be enough. And it seems that no one is pinning special hopes on the second flight. 2 drums of 6 megaton rockets. Even if a quarter reaches its goal, the US as a country will cease to exist. Hiroshima and Nagasaki fell 50 kilotons each. And these were dirty bombs due to imperfect technology. Now the exhaust is about 90-95 percent
          1. 0
            16 September 2020 14: 21
            "This alone will be enough" - what is enough and for what? England and the USA have been at gunpoint for our missiles for 60 years (in words for the inattentive - SIXTY YEARS)! This is enough to prevent a nuclear war, no additional duty of the Tu-95 is needed. For something else - no, and here the duty of the Tu-95 will not help us. No one will love, respect, or lift sanctions because of a pair of uranium-stuffed bombers.
        3. 0
          16 September 2020 02: 03

          A. Privalov (Alexander Privalov)
          Yesterday, 20: 28
          The fact is that a pair of Tu-160s approached such a distance to the British Isles, which allowed them to "reach" with their weapons both to the said Fairford airbase in Gloucestershire, and to London - with its residences of the royal person and the Prime Minister.
          I would have spread my brains myself)) laughing tongue laughing than pouring onto the fan again. "Pair of Tu-160"!!!!!!!!!!!!!
          An excellent old anecdote: "But here in America .... England! Your England is no longer there!" laughing wassat laughing
      4. -1
        16 September 2020 14: 13
        "It is much wiser to organize a constant vigil of a pair of our strategic bombers with cruise missiles on board at the positions from which the missiles will reach the US territory and especially densely populated areas" - I apologize, but what the hell is this masturbation? Firstly, count how many strategists we have and how long they will last with this use; secondly, the entire US territory has long been under the gun of our ICBMs and SSARBs. CD strategists are simply superfluous here. Yes, there is to fly near the coast of a potential enemy, so that his illiterate population is scared, or off the coast of an ally, in order to inspire his illiterate population, and to please their illiterate patriots - strategists are capable of this. In a local war, missiles and planning bombs are to be dropped from afar. And in a nuclear apocalypse, they most likely simply will not have time to do anything.
        1. -2
          16 September 2020 19: 24
          Quote: Sergey Sfyedu
          I'm sorry, but what the fuck is this masturbation?

          You can engage in masturbation of your own free will, and pilots of strategic aviation practice combat missions during exercises and training.
          Quote: Sergey Sfyedu
          First, count how many strategists we have and how long they will last with this use,

          Nobody plans that it will be for years - a month is enough, and the Americans will get worn out raising their interceptors when our planes approach the US border. During this time, some crews will make only a few sorties, so that the resource of the aircraft will not be used up much.
          Quote: Sergey Sfyedu
          Yes, there is to fly off the coast of a potential enemy to scare his illiterate population, or on the shores of an ally to inspire his illiterate population, and to please their illiterate patriots - strategists are capable of this.

          That's right, in order to force Americans to change diapers all the time - it's not about our patriotism, but about putting the presumptuous Yankees in their place.
          Quote: Sergey Sfyedu
          And in a nuclear apocalypse, they most likely simply will not have time to do anything.

          A nuclear war will not start five minutes after the decision by the President of the United States - it will take more time to carry out a set of measures at least for his evacuation. So it's not a fact that our intelligence will not reveal this, and it is possible that some of our crews will have time to take off.
          1. 0
            17 September 2020 07: 22
            "You can engage in masturbation at will, and strategic aviation pilots practice combat missions during exercises and training." - and keeping strategists in the air constantly, developing them into a fairly depleted resource - this is real masturbation. And absolutely useless. The Yankees know perfectly well that we have all of America at gunpoint and in the event of aggression will turn into a nuclear desert. Do you know how many years the new Tu-160 has been under construction? How much does it cost? And how many pieces can we rivet in 10 years? The purpose of provocative flights near our borders is to drag us into a new arms race, drain our economy and achieve the same degradation as in the late 80s. You have to think with your head, and not with other organs.
            "Nobody plans that it will be for years - a month is enough, and the Americans will spend their money raising their interceptors when our planes get closer to the US border. During this time, some crews will make only a few sorties, so the aircraft's resource will not be used up much." - why such optimism? Never get worn out. Our air defense, why is it worn out to fly to intercept Western aircraft? A fighter is not a strategist, it just has to fly a lot. And should be able to intercept a standard target. And there are a lot of them, fighters, amers. A lot. Yes, the Yankees will only say thank you - they will knock out money from the Congress for new fighters and air defense systems. We have gone through all this more than once during the Cold War.
            "That's right, to force Americans to change diapers all the time - it's not about our patriotism, but about putting the presumptuous Yankees in their place." - I don’t know about the Yankees, but our commentators’s diapers have flowed - “B-52 is at our borders, save yourself who can!”. The Yankees are not fools, they know the true combat value of the B-52, Tu-95, and Tu-160. Hope that they are basic cowards and fools? Well, hope, hope, underestimating the enemy has never led to anything good.
            "A nuclear war will not start five minutes after the decision by the President of the United States - it will take more time to carry out a set of measures at least for his evacuation. So it is not a fact that our intelligence will not reveal this, and it is possible that some of our crews will have time to take off." yes, no difference. Until they reach America, if they do, of course, there will be no America. Strategic aviation in a nuclear war is just a reserve, to finish off what survived, if, of course, we and they generally have something to survive. Do you think the Yankees are such fools that they dispersed their strategic air command and spend the valuable resource of strategists on escorting convoys in Afghanistan and bombing the barmaley in Asia? All these B-1, B-2, and the planned B-21 do not even have cruise missiles.
  8. +5
    15 September 2020 19: 06
    The fact is that a pair of Tu-160s approached such a distance to the British Isles, which allowed them to "reach" with their weapons both to the said Fairford airbase in Gloucestershire, and to London - with its residences of the royal person and the Prime Minister.

    This is a normal distance
  9. -1
    15 September 2020 19: 07
    Well, if point strikes then okay ...
  10. -1
    15 September 2020 19: 14
    Jokes are jokes, but ringing the whole world about meetings and negotiations has now become dangerous. Well, these thugs would have beheaded both countries, who would have seized power? Dima-podeozhi watermelon, or 15-year-old son?
    1. +6
      15 September 2020 19: 21
      Quote: 7,62x54
      Well, these thugs would have beheaded both countries, who would have seized power? Dima-podeozhi watermelon, or 15-year-old son?

      Are you serious? Yes, they would not have had time to open the bomb bays as they would have been sent to feed the fish
      1. +1
        15 September 2020 19: 44
        Quote: Lipchanin
        Yes, they would not have had time to open the bomb bays as they would have been sent to feed the fish

        What direct fish is that? It is necessary to be more tolerant with tolerasts. They will simply be given a free ticket to an exclusive excursion to the seabed lol
        1. +2
          15 September 2020 19: 46
          Quote: Tusv
          They will simply be given a free ticket to an exclusive excursion to the seabed

          Sorry, but I'm not like you laughing
          1. +2
            15 September 2020 19: 54
            Quote: Lipchanin
            Sorry, but I'm not like you

            What an esthete? What is the main thing in the army? Plausible excuse. We are all to them, but they are not stupid surfaced. What claims laughing
            1. 0
              15 September 2020 20: 03
              Quote: Tusv
              What an esthete?

              ESTHETE. Sometimes some letters do not break through request
              What is the main thing in the army? Plausible excuse.

              That I know laughing
              Learned to rub glasses laughing
              1. 0
                15 September 2020 21: 00
                Quote: Lipchanin
                ESTHETE. Sometimes some letters do not break through

                By the way, I didn't notice. In the context of the norms it was read.
                Learned to rub glasses

                Learn, learn and learn. And for poaching, present a tidy invoice (This is an invoice in their language). For dangerous maneuvers in the area of ​​intensive navigation, for damage to the environment and other and forfeit for refusing a free excursion
        2. -8
          15 September 2020 20: 04
          Quote: Tusv
          Quote: Lipchanin
          Yes, they would not have had time to open the bomb bays as they would have been sent to feed the fish

          What direct fish is that? It is necessary to be more tolerant with tolerasts. They will simply be given a free ticket to an exclusive excursion to the seabed lol


          Don't you think that our bomber pilots would not have had time to open the bomb bays?
          Did you write them down to tolerasts?
          1. +11
            15 September 2020 20: 27
            The approach of the B52 at a pistol shot distance to SochAm in this situation is unheard of insolence.
            The Russian Aerospace Forces immediately responded with the same impudence.
            It is clear that in reality no one will fight like this - neither ours will be allowed close to the foggy Albion during the threatened period, and even more so no B52 will fly up to the residence of the President of the Russian Federation.
            And this was just an exchange of "pleasantries".
    2. +4
      15 September 2020 19: 36
      Quote: 7,62x54
      Jokes are jokes, but ringing the whole world about meetings and negotiations has now become dangerous.

      I remember one prime minister from Australia for the whole world, the trend is that he will take Putin by the breast, so Vladimir Vladimirovich entrusted the treatment for megalomania to KTOF. And with words, for your safety. The greatness subsided instantly.
      Now for another moment. And Shoigu will come to power, and it will be so, most likely with the elimination of the head of the Russian Federation, will it become easier for them?
      1. -12
        15 September 2020 20: 05
        Quote: Tusv
        Quote: 7,62x54
        Jokes are jokes, but ringing the whole world about meetings and negotiations has now become dangerous.

        I remember one prime minister from Australia for the whole world, the trend is that he will take Putin by the breast, so Vladimir Vladimirovich entrusted the treatment for megalomania to KTOF. And with words, for your safety. The greatness subsided instantly.
        Now for another moment. And Shoigu will come to power, and it will be so, most likely with the elimination of the head of the Russian Federation, will it become easier for them?


        The Australian fleet at the moment is significantly stronger than the Russian ...

        Who did you instruct?

        Are you wet fantasizing chtoli in the corner?
        1. +7
          15 September 2020 20: 35
          Quote: SovAr238A

          The Australian fleet at the moment is significantly stronger than the Russian ...

          The Australian fleet can destroy 9/10 of the population of Russia at once России belay Something I very much doubt it. It looks like you need to stop rustling under the covers, and so something is already blisters.
        2. +1
          15 September 2020 20: 39
          Quote: SovAr238A
          The Australian fleet at the moment is significantly stronger than the Russian ...

          Other than that, all the fighters do not take into account Strategic and Multipurpose nuclear submarines. Well, there are certainly few of them, but the Australian fleet with the Japanese and South Korean combined will have enough for the eyes and will still be left for the Yankees
      2. +4
        15 September 2020 21: 01
        Russia is a country of endless possibilities. The guard can become the commander of the guards. Not serving in the army - the minister of defense.
        1. +1
          15 September 2020 21: 08
          Quote: 7,62x54
          The guard can become the commander of the guards. Not serving in the army - the minister of defense.

          Well, in Russia, the military department was not canceled. My son has not yet graduated from the Bauman Moscow State Technical University, but already has a title. And in the Guard, everything is simple. If you are a Guardsman, then you are definitely no longer an ordinary guard. hi
        2. AML
          +1
          15 September 2020 23: 14
          Quote: 7,62x54
          Russia is a country of endless possibilities. The guard can become the commander of the guards. Not serving in the army - the minister of defense.

          Reagan was an artist so what? Or can they?
          1. 0
            16 September 2020 07: 23
            It all depends on the preparation and readiness to perform the assigned tasks. Reagan to practice as governor of the state before the presidency, but Zelensky ... Directly. The result is obvious.
          2. 0
            16 September 2020 12: 57
            Reagan had been a politician for many years before.
        3. 0
          16 September 2020 02: 34
          bodyguard-became the main bodyguard-the main body`, and you look at the western mines
    3. +1
      15 September 2020 19: 37
      This "decapitation" would cost humanity dearly. Immediately the Apocalypse, for this is already an attack. Volley with all arsenal
  11. +2
    15 September 2020 19: 14
    Sir! No one can feel completely safe and impunity, even Achilles had a weak spot.
  12. +1
    15 September 2020 19: 23
    There was no such thing before, when Putin was in Sochi, that the Americans and NATO behaved so impudently. Some kind of decency was observed. We are waiting for an answer, which they will remember for a long time. I assure it will be. And further on Zhirinovsky, with his anecdote about toilets. This is not forgiven. ... fool drinks wassat
    1. 0
      15 September 2020 19: 54
      Quote: tralflot1832
      .We are waiting for a reply

      So they immediately answered
      It is noteworthy that for a kind of restoration of aviation parity on the same day, the strategic missile carriers Tu-160 of the Russian Aerospace Forces were raised into the air. Russian "strategists", who were accompanied by MiG-31 interceptor fighters of the naval aviation of the Russian Navy in some parts of the route, headed for the North Atlantic.

      , writes that Russian strategic bombers, in fact, demonstrated to Washington and London their readiness to respond to the threat posed to the Russian leader by the US Air Force. The fact is that a pair of Tu-160s approached such a distance to the British Isles, which allowed them to "reach" with their weapons both to the said Fairford airbase in Gloucestershire, and to London - with its residences of the royal person and the Prime Minister.
      1. 0
        15 September 2020 19: 59
        The order was not given from England. We only took aim at the B 52 return airfield. The order was from the pontogon pentagon. We have not reached there yet. hi
        1. +2
          15 September 2020 20: 11
          Quote: tralflot1832
          We haven't reached there yet

          Strategic Missile Forces will reach
          1. 0
            15 September 2020 20: 22
            In the USSR, the mine covers were opened for such an occasion, at least the bike was running. hi
            1. +2
              15 September 2020 20: 51
              Quote: tralflot1832
              In the USSR, the mine covers were opened for such an occasion, at least the bike was running.

              Why a bike. The newspaper Pravda wrote about it on TV in the Vremya program. They say for imperialist aggression against the entire progressive world, the troops of the Strategic Missile Forces are put on high alert. Even Boryusik periodically opened mines in moments of aggressive drinking. And what the newspaper wrote is True, it was true
  13. 0
    15 September 2020 19: 33
    A classic of the genre, put a gun to your partner's temple when he brandishes his weapon at the face of the first
  14. -2
    15 September 2020 19: 40
    Reach out - it can reach, although it is doubtful because they will intercept on approach. But this is not at all the same as the fact that the B-52H Stratofortress will be able to be based in Ukraine. Again, a NATO strategic bomber in the airspace of Ukraine, with a full range of strategic offensive weapons at a convenient height and speed for launching cruise missiles with nuclear warheads - and only 600 km from Moscow, and even under the cover of the Ukrainian Air Force and Air Defense!
    1. 0
      16 September 2020 12: 25
      Quote: Ervin
      Again, a NATO strategic bomber in Ukrainian airspace, with a full range of strategic offensive weapons at a convenient height and speed to launch nuclear-armed cruise missiles

      Firstly, this is not a fact, because the flight could be a training one. And secondly, even in Soviet times, the flights of EVERY B-52 were tracked from the moment they took off at US bases, and at least 4 thousand km before their approach to our borders, the means of radio-technical air defense and reconnaissance structures took them under control.
      Thirdly, the massive takeoff of such aircraft is dangerous, and not single flights - you just need to monitor the entire situation, and not panic unnecessarily.
      But we need to give them a hand, and the appearance of our Tu-95s on duty is a good prevention for them.
      1. -3
        16 September 2020 12: 32
        What is not a fact? That you didn't get a cruise missile yesterday? So it's not a fact that she won't arrive tomorrow! Are you tracking the flight of the B-52? The flag is in your hands and a drum around your neck when he starts to open the bomb bays! And you need control in order not to screw up. And that the Tu-95 will be able to stay within the Russian Federation? Is that - to bomb Voronezh. And the B-52H Stratofortress from the territory of Ukraine will jokingly reach Moscow and St. Petersburg with simple cruise missiles, of which he can take on board more than your fingers and toes + convolutions in your head. I’m telling you about a real danger that has already come, and you’re telling me to not panic!
        1. -1
          16 September 2020 12: 47
          Quote: Ervin
          What is not a fact? That you didn't get a cruise missile yesterday?

          In general, the war with the United States will not begin with the launch of one missile from a B-52 aircraft flying over the territory of Ukraine, if only because such missiles are easily shot down by our air defense systems.
          Quote: Ervin
          So it's not a fact that she won't arrive tomorrow!

          Well then, take a white sheet and move towards the cemetery - since you feel such fear, nothing will help you, not even common sense.

          Quote: Ervin
          And that the Tu-95 will be able to stay within the Russian Federation?

          Will be able to destroy Anchorage and all American bases near our borders.
          Quote: Ervin
          I’m telling you about a real danger that has already come, and you’re telling me to not panic!

          You are just a big weirdo, and thinks that everyone should feel the same fear as you. Who do you want to intimidate - the Americans or us? Nothing will remain of them as soon as the first missile leaves the B-52 and flies in our direction - though with a delay of forty minutes, but no more.
          1. -2
            16 September 2020 12: 52
            I see history teaches you nothing. Already "shot down" planes crossing the border of the then Soviet Union - "shot down" landed on the "forced" on Red Square. Hurray patriot, you say? There are a lot of such people who go straight to heaven without having time to repent. And how will your jingoistic patriotism help in a real batch? "With little blood on the enemy's territory" - have already passed. Do you want to repeat it without drawing conclusions from history?
        2. -1
          16 September 2020 12: 56
          what is the real danger?
  15. +1
    15 September 2020 19: 55
    Flying around the corner is not very effective, but noticeable.
  16. -6
    15 September 2020 19: 56
    Can you show - "to Seattle"?
    Well, the Tu-160 is a strategic bomber ...
    I must destroy targets on enemy territory ...
    And the enemy is not in London ...

    And then somehow an ordinary 737 Civil Boeing flies to London ...



    Articles and opuses of our military news-makers are dumping into some kind of crap ...

    You are still beginning to grasp the TU-160 to Vilnius and Tallinn ...
    To the strangers ...
    1. 0
      15 September 2020 20: 12
      Quote: SovAr238A
      And the enemy is not in London ..

      And which is not in London there is the Strategic Missile Forces
    2. 0
      15 September 2020 21: 30
      It is a great honor for swans to chase sprats! hi
    3. 0
      15 September 2020 22: 00
      And the enemy is not in London ..

      Do you think the Rothschilds have changed their location? )))
    4. 0
      16 September 2020 02: 39
      Enemies around and in the same London
  17. -1
    15 September 2020 20: 26
    no guys, our otvetka is like despair .. yes 160 appeared at the British islands, but in order to get there they fly all over Europe, they are first led by the Norwegians, then the Danes, then the shaved .. there is no factor of surprise and real fear that they missed Russian bombers. The response would have been defended if the Tu 160 link unnoticed went to the launch lines, and then redistributed the "special and insolent hello" of the Air Defense or NATO Navy (a flight at low altitude at the side of the destroyer, and he would have found 160, only visually at 3-5 km) ..with subsequent enuresis in NATO officials. Their B52 can easily pass through all of Europe .. no one intercepts them for escort, and we will see them only at our borders. Amers have the initiative here. They want to do something and get up in a brazen ... showing their superiority and impunity. Need a tough one. a brazen and sophisticated otvetka for pride and prestige amers and NATO. But this will be an escalation, because for their pride they will begin to respond to us .. we will be forced to give more non-standard answers .. and so it will go. But expressing concern and calling for compliance with the m / n rules is a manifestation of weakness in the modern world. But we will not be able to withstand Cold War-2 either. We do not have a strategic concept of countering the United States, NATO + allies simultaneously from several directions and conventional weapons. Yes, and at least plans for preventive retaliatory measures to force other countries to comply with the international requirements and their resistance to the United States.
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. 3vs
    +1
    15 September 2020 20: 44
    It is necessary to involve the Luhansk Kulibins in the fight against American aviation! laughing
  20. +3
    15 September 2020 21: 22
    The agony of pendoctan. The carcasses worked out a nuclear strike against Britain, and the submarines "unexpectedly" surfaced, stayed for a bit at the surface of the US coast, and again went under the water column - they worked out the incineration of the US territory in tech. a few minutes. Here the pendants got a bomb, and they understand that it will be so every time

    And in November there was a civil war in the United States. We are waiting
    1. -1
      16 September 2020 13: 00
      Fascinating delirium
    2. 0
      16 September 2020 14: 30
      "There is a civil war in the US in November. We are waiting, sir." Tell me, what kind of grass do you smoke, dear?
      1. 0
        19 September 2020 01: 29
        You will see for yourself, send another apology
  21. AML
    +1
    15 September 2020 23: 10
    Quote: SovAr238A
    Quote: businessv
    Quote: GREG68
    Well done videoconferencing. The answer should be symmetrical.

    Absolutely agree! Everything should look like a carousel! Only the minke whales took a course in our direction, on the other hand, ours are doing a similar maneuver in their direction, to balance. Although I actively dislike these games! soldier


    Americans on the one hand ...

    And we are in the direction of the British ...


    So why not toward the Americans themselves?
    Where are the flights to Miami, Seattle, Los Angeles?

    Where are the real flights, and not the scruffy flights around Chukotka with the news that they flew near America ...

    Yes, we have so much of this shoe polish that we don't even need to deliver it anywhere. You can bang all the khan right in the place.
  22. +1
    15 September 2020 23: 28
    And it was impossible to squeeze these bombers from Crimea? Roll ... bulk ... undercut ...
    1. AML
      +2
      16 September 2020 00: 45
      Quote: Sheptun
      And it was impossible to squeeze these bombers from Crimea? Roll ... bulk ... undercut ...

      and they violated the border? I understand it is unpleasant, but then the whole world is in dust at once, why waste time on trifles
      1. 0
        16 September 2020 01: 35
        No ... not in dust, but squeeze out.
  23. AML
    +1
    16 September 2020 01: 43
    Quote: Sheptun
    No ... not in dust, but squeeze out.

    Who knows what he's got on board and maybe the pilots are incontinent. You will scare them, and they will throw off the ammunition out of habit, such as an emergency situation, turbulence, but you never know what you can think of and it seems like it’s his own fault. be measured by pipis virtually.
    1. 0
      16 September 2020 14: 37
      "the world is preparing for a global war, which, in my opinion, will bang in 24 years" - well, you understand that, you have already dug your own personal bunker. But why are you writing about the whole world? - neither we, nor the Yankees, nor the Britons, nor even the Chinese dig bunkers for themselves, everyone dreams of selling more oil, gas and other goods, everyone gives birth to children and builds cities. All this fuss with weapons is because they are afraid of us, and we are afraid of them. But so far, everyone is more afraid of nuclear war, and this is somewhat reassuring.
      1. 0
        19 September 2020 01: 04
        And I bet on 2022. And let it not be a direct war, but the confrontation will multiply in the spheres of information, ideology, technology.
  24. 0
    16 September 2020 05: 13
    Thank God, they started to answer !!! rather than expressing "concern".
  25. 0
    16 September 2020 06: 17
    The Americans will easily sacrifice London, if anything. The main thing is that there is no war on its territory
  26. 0
    16 September 2020 07: 30
    Well, royalty is the most important goal, yeah ...
  27. AML
    +1
    16 September 2020 07: 57
    Quote: Vladimir Demyanov
    It all depends on the preparation and readiness to perform the assigned tasks. Reagan to practice as governor of the state before the presidency, but Zelensky ... Directly. The result is obvious.


    Zelensky may well pull the governing of the country, he is far from a boy from the street. He has many companies that he owns. But it is aimed at a different result - the collapse of the country. That's the whole difference. Reagan worked for his people. Zelensky for a stranger.
  28. AML
    +1
    16 September 2020 08: 05
    Quote: Mimino
    Well, royalty is the most important goal, yeah ...

    Why not? English citizens and satellite countries take the oath not to the state of England, but to the queen, with all that it implies. The unexpected "departure" of the monarch is still a gemmor for the country.

    In any case, until England finally leaves for another world, she will shit, and her methods have never been distinguished by philanthropy. Therefore, with any batch, you have to bang around England.
  29. 0
    16 September 2020 14: 10
    The flight of the Tu-160 to the North Atlantic, the pilots called it "going around the corner" - it is clear from the flight map :)
  30. 0
    19 September 2020 01: 02
    In fact, there are provocations, as in 1940. It's just that we're not going to ignore them now.
    And after all, what is described in the article is just one of a number of similar provocations,
    which have now become almost daily.
  31. 0
    19 September 2020 09: 42
    Yeah, our report to Chamberlain.