Pompeo: US will create missiles to counter "Russian aggression"

42
Pompeo: US will create missiles to counter "Russian aggression"

The United States intends to create intermediate and shorter-range missiles to counter "Russian aggression." This was stated by the head of the US State Department Mike Pompeo.

Speaking via video link from Jerusalem to participants in the Republican Party's national election congress, Pompeo said that the US withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF Treaty) has made it possible to build intermediate and shorter-range missiles needed to contain "Russian aggression."



America abandoned a harmful treaty so that our country could build missiles to deter Russian aggression

- he stressed.

Talking about the successes of the current US President Donald Trump, the Secretary of State said that he (Trump - approx.) Achieved the strengthening of NATO, armed Ukraine, dissuaded North Korea from nuclear tests and did many other good things for the United States.

Today, thanks to President Trump, NATO has become stronger, Ukraine has defensive weapons system, resists the aggression of Iran in the region (...) he defeated the terrorist group ISIS (banned in Russia - approx.), defends America from the predatory strategy of the Chinese Communist Party

- said Pompeo.

Recall that the United States withdrew from the INF Treaty on August 2, 2019, accusing Russia of this. Despite all the statements that the United States is not developing missiles prohibited by the treaty, on August 21, 2019, a Tomahawk rocket was tested from a ground installation. In response to the US withdrawal from the treaty, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the development of an appropriate response.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    26 August 2020 09: 58
    I looked at him and remembered the anecdote.

    -Well, you have a neck!
    -So beer so-su!
    - Yes, you at least .... so-si, you need to wash your neck.
    1. +5
      26 August 2020 10: 27
      The Americans have come up with a wonderful excuse for themselves for all time: EVERYTHING they do not get up to is "to resist" Russian aggression ""! lol
      1. +1
        26 August 2020 16: 31
        Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
        The Americans have come up with a wonderful excuse for themselves for all time: EVERYTHING they do not get up to is "to resist" Russian aggression ""! lol

        =======
        A clear option! The loudest shouts: "Stop the thief!" the thief himself !!!
    2. 0
      26 August 2020 10: 28
      Quote: Temples
      -Well, you have a neck!
      -So beer so-su!

      Yes ! My neck is strong. Yes, I'm telling you that you need to wash your neck.
    3. +3
      26 August 2020 10: 35
      Pompeo: America abandoned a harmful treaty ...

      Pompeo fool so the contract is voluntary agreement between two or more sides.
      Wonderful in full.
      1. +2
        26 August 2020 13: 43
        Quote: Terenin
        Pompeo: America abandoned a harmful treaty ...

        Pompeo fool so the contract is voluntary agreement between two or more sides.
        Wonderful in full.

        As much as the Amers regretted about it .. It was not a bad contract all the same .. Russia will always find an inexpensive and effective answer, as has happened more than once in our history.
        1. +1
          26 August 2020 15: 15
          Here you should rather think about where they will place these missiles ?! They have already withdrawn from the agreement, and even earlier they had put financing into the budget.
          I think they can do it in Afghanistan. In the west, Iran (SD missiles hit much farther), in the east of the PRC (Beijing will reach even the coast of TO), in the north of Central Asia and the Russian Federation (a range of 5 thousand km - they reach the northern Urals), in the south India and Pakistan. A "trump" place is obtained - all nuclear countries in Asia are targeted. hi
          1. +2
            26 August 2020 16: 25
            Quote: Kasym
            Here you should rather think about where they will place these missiles ?!

            Well, we also wonder where they have close by .. Can you imagine what kind of panic will start? Why is the United States possible, but Russia is not .. I'm sure the Amers themselves will ask for negotiations on these missiles .. There is a risk of a big war, of course, but what remains for us?
            1. +2
              26 August 2020 19: 35
              Quote: Komissar
              I'm sure the Amersians themselves will ask for negotiations on these missiles .. Of course there is a risk of a big war, but what remains for us?

              As Verkhglavkom said, "... why do we need the world if there is no Russia in it !?"
              Hi guys hi
      2. +2
        26 August 2020 20: 13
        Terenin:
        an agreement is a voluntary agreement between two or more parties


        Reminded "12 chairs":
        - Consent is a product with complete non-resistance of the parties!
        1. +3
          26 August 2020 20: 28
          Quote: OldMichael
          Terenin:
          an agreement is a voluntary agreement between two or more parties


          Reminded "12 chairs":
          - Consent is a product with complete non-resistance of the parties!

          Exactly. You could say that. Yes
  2. +2
    26 August 2020 09: 59
    Pompeo: US will create missiles to counter "Russian aggression"
    Create, do not hesitate, once in your head fool ringing and no oil.
    1. +2
      26 August 2020 10: 25
      to counter the "Russian aggression"

      to contain "Russian aggression".

      necessary to contain "Russian aggression".

      resists Iran's aggression in the region

      defends America from the predatory strategy of the Chinese Communist Party
    2. +1
      26 August 2020 10: 51
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Pompeo: US will create missiles to counter "Russian aggression"
      Create, do not hesitate, once in your head fool ringing and no oil.

      Isn't it better for America to create anti-aggressive diapers... They will definitely come in handy. Yes
  3. +4
    26 August 2020 10: 08
    How did this political clownery get it? am But at least he admitted that they left the INF Treaty not because of Russia's violations of the treaty, but because of their own wishes, or had already forgotten about what tales they told the world when they left the treaty what , already progress laughing , although what am I talking about? and yes, these storytellers get all the information from the media, and they can start a war if some rag writes about Russian aggression negative
    1. +2
      26 August 2020 10: 17
      Quote: Hto tama
      at least admitted that they left the INF Treaty not because of Russia's violations of the treaty, but because of their wishes

      Well, they also justified the Chinese, they say, the PRC has these RIACs like dirt, and we here with the Russians are self-limiting, and soon we will completely disappear from the Chinese threat.
      The CIA spy - China is here as an excuse, they will be deployed in Europe against the Russian Federation.
      1. 0
        26 August 2020 10: 20
        Quote: Captain Pushkin
        Quote: Hto tama
        at least admitted that they left the INF Treaty not because of Russia's violations of the treaty, but because of their wishes

        Well, they also justified the Chinese, they say, the PRC has these RIACs like dirt, and we here with the Russians are self-limiting, and soon we will completely disappear from the Chinese threat.
        The CIA spy - China is here as an excuse, they will be deployed in Europe against the Russian Federation.

        Why only in Europe? We are already talking about accommodation in Japan and hi
        1. 0
          26 August 2020 12: 37
          Quote: Hto tama
          The CIA spy - China is here as an excuse, they will be deployed in Europe against the Russian Federation.

          Why only in Europe? We are already talking about accommodation in Japan and

          In Japan, at least somehow it can be attributed to the Chinese, but from Europe to threaten China with the INF is somehow strange.
          1. 0
            26 August 2020 15: 22
            Nobody believes in the words of the Americans for a long time, Russia has always been and will be the number one enemy for the Anglo-Saxons Yes .A new administration will come and relations with China may change, with Russia never hi
    2. +1
      26 August 2020 10: 56
      So he confessed.
      America left a harmful treaty so our country could build missiles

      All that is further substituted automatically when writing any text.
  4. 0
    26 August 2020 10: 10
    The difference is that they can drag these missiles to our border, but we cannot.
    Placed in Chukotka, so only in Alaska (and what the hell?) And Canada will get it.
  5. +2
    26 August 2020 10: 11
    How easy it has become to cut the budget striped: he threw a cry about the aggression of Russia, once and allocated a dozen dollars to arms corporations, soon, when mentioning the invasion of the Atlanteans and talking about illegal stellar aggressors, Congress will easily transfer hundreds or two billions of greenery to the development companies. So it's not a pity - a lot of paper, they will print as many bucks as they need ...
    1. 0
      26 August 2020 10: 16
      They also added China, they will scare the Ministry of Finance and the Senate even more!
  6. 0
    26 August 2020 10: 16
    he would still have to shake the rocket model from the podium))) well, so for the entourage ... so that in general a picture for the broad masses of the people of the United States)))
  7. +1
    26 August 2020 10: 19
    Pompeo: US will create missiles to counter "Russian aggression"

    He said and said, even if they do .... and we will already have OTHER ARGUMENTS, Schaub break off all their Wishlist.
  8. +2
    26 August 2020 10: 19
    The trouble is that the INF is purely offensive weapons and cannot deter aggression in any way, if missile defense and air defense, to a greater extent, can be attributed to defense, then it does not roll.
    So who is the aggressor? Who interfered with the INF Treaty?
  9. +2
    26 August 2020 10: 20
    From Posner to the most recent pro-Western political scientist, everyone is trying to convince us that American citizens do not give a damn about foreign policy, they are only interested in what is happening in their country, but for some reason it is precisely the success in foreign policy that is decisive during the elections ...
  10. +3
    26 August 2020 10: 22
    What kind of aggression? What would Russia not interfere with the deployment of military bases around its borders ?.)
  11. 0
    26 August 2020 10: 25
    America abandoned a harmful treaty so that our country could build missiles to deter Russian aggression
    Well, and then for several years they talked that Russia is violating, Russia is violating ... The same happened with the missile defense system in Europe - "against Iran", but not against Russia. And the expulsion of diplomats, and the appropriation of Russian property, and spy scandals, and hackers, etc. - all from one opera. With missiles it is clear, but when to expect sanctions on "Navalny's list"?
  12. 0
    26 August 2020 10: 30
    Today, thanks to President Trump, NATO has become stronger, Ukraine has defensive weapon systems, and is opposing Iran's aggression in the region (...)

    Ukraine, thanks to President Trump, is opposing Iran's aggression in the region?
    Well, how intricate the paths of current politics are ...
  13. 0
    26 August 2020 10: 31
    The Reagan-Gorby plan is being implemented. The final stage.
  14. 0
    26 August 2020 10: 36
    already Russian aggression when the war will go to the Russian Federation? it is necessary for the Russian Federation to strike first, that's all sooner or later they will go to war, no matter how crazy it sounds, other people think differently than an ordinary person
    1. 0
      26 August 2020 11: 25
      Quote: opuonmed
      it is necessary for the Russian Federation to strike first, that's all

      How to strike? First, you need to demonstrate this on New Earth. If you withdraw from contracts, then from all at once. And it looks like the frog is being boiled over very low heat.
    2. 0
      26 August 2020 14: 05
      Dinosaur dinosaur eyes will not go out: the world system of capitalism ... Eh.
  15. +1
    26 August 2020 10: 49
    Exactly two weeks after leaving the INF Treaty, the United States tested a supposedly just designed and built (in two weeks !!!) land-based cruise missile with a range of 621 miles. Any questions about who violated the INF Treaty? No questions :-)
  16. +1
    26 August 2020 10: 59
    Yes fucked up this one
  17. 0
    26 August 2020 11: 01
    America abandoned a harmful treaty so that our country could build missiles to deter Russian aggression

    Everything American for the sake of peace on earth. Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan were bombed for the sake of democracy and the prosperity of their peoples. Are these missiles likely to be especially peaceful?
  18. 0
    26 August 2020 12: 09
    "Pompeo: The United States Will Build Missiles to Resist 'Russian Aggression'"
    - First of all, America needs to create missiles to deter its own aggression. And then - how it goes.
  19. -1
    26 August 2020 12: 53
    The United States intends to create intermediate and shorter-range missiles to counter "Russian aggression." This was stated by the head of the US State Department Mike Pompeo.
    Interestingly, this stewed pork knows other propaganda speeches? laughing
  20. 0
    26 August 2020 14: 38
    We have to test the minefields of the new generation there. It's time to unfold and wait. And, when there is a big bada-boom, urgently lower the divers and screw up all the secret equipment ...
  21. Lew
    0
    26 August 2020 15: 31
    need to do something ... to be afraid of sho?
  22. 0
    26 August 2020 21: 07
    And the Russian Federation will create missiles from American brainlessness and lawlessness