Military Review

Experts discuss why three Su-1 fighters went up to intercept the B-35B Lancer of the USAF

81
Experts discuss why three Su-1 fighters went up to intercept the B-35B Lancer of the USAF

It was confirmed that three Russian fighters of the 1 ++ Su-4 generation were raised to intercept the American strategic bomber B-35B Lancer. The information is shared by the National Center for Defense Control of Russia (NTSUO).


According to the NTSUO, the US Air Force B-1B Lancer strategic bomber entered the airspace over the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. At the same time, it is emphasized that the American aircraft did not violate Russian air borders.

American combat aviation lately it has been increasingly becoming a "visitor" of the airspace over the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. At the same time, the flight there by the Americans is usually carried out in the airspace between certain islands of the Kuril ridge - so that the air borders of the Russian Federation are not violated. At the same time, with such flights, the United States is trying to make it clear that it is ready to challenge Russian sovereignty over the Kuriles, which makes Japan feel particularly positive.

In connection with the next entry of the US Air Force strategic bomber into the airspace over the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, experts are discussing the question of why it was necessary to raise three Su-1 fighters to intercept the B-35B Lancer?

One of the voiced versions is as follows: the American crew decided to demonstrate the power of the Russian military aviation, which is capable of forcing the bomber crew to change course. In the end, this is what happened: after the appearance of the Su-35 B-1B, the Lancer began to move further from the Russian borders. The American pilots got the Russian signal right.

In addition, it is noted that video recording was clearly carried out from the board of Russian aircraft, the recordings of which may soon be demonstrated by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. Such filming, in the event of new claims from the United States about the allegedly "unsafe" and "unprofessional" interception, may prove that the Pentagon's statements are extremely far from the truth.
81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. iouris
    iouris 7 August 2020 21: 55
    53 th
    How many warrant officers does it take to screw in a lamp? Correct answer: six.
    1. Shilka
      Shilka 7 August 2020 22: 11
      28 th
      Experts discuss why three Su-1 fighters went up to intercept the B-35B Lancer of the USAF

      The program for the UAV was most likely worked out .. hi
      This might be the whole point ..?

      We are Russian those still Kulibins he he
      1. smart ass
        smart ass 8 August 2020 05: 41
        +6
        Himself what he invented?
      2. NordUral
        NordUral 8 August 2020 18: 47
        +4
        And what don't you like, "hehe"?
    2. Prisoner
      Prisoner 8 August 2020 07: 14
      +2
      What can you say here? Anecdote - the pinnacle of oslomia. Can I laugh?
  2. Lt. Air Force stock
    Lt. Air Force stock 7 August 2020 22: 02
    +8
    The answer is simple, the B1B can fire 24 JASSM-ER missiles. To intercept so many missiles, you need to have a lot of firepower, hence the 3 Su-35S
    1. iouris
      iouris 7 August 2020 23: 31
      +9
      Quote: Lt. air force reserve
      B1B can launch 24 JASSM-ER missiles

      Or maybe not "run".
      Do you think the three of them will have to wait until he "starts" everything?
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock 7 August 2020 23: 48
        +3
        Quote: iouris
        Or maybe not "run".
        Do you think the three of them will have to wait until he "starts" everything?

        No one will be ahead of the curve, all the more so while B1B is in international airspace. Launching from drum launchers is very fast. In short, the situation can develop for everyone. Do not forget that the bomber has a powerful electronic warfare system, which can also be used, which will lead to the disruption of the guidance of some air-to-air missiles, and the JASSM-ER target is inconspicuous and there are certainly electronic warfare systems on missiles.
        1. Alber alber
          Alber alber 8 August 2020 00: 49
          17
          As soon as there is even a simple hint of opening the bomb bay of the Lancer, a bell will ring in his cockpit that he has been taken to escort with all the available suitable arsenal
        2. vfwfr
          vfwfr 8 August 2020 07: 59
          +2
          VPU * for the number of Su-35)) And no electronic warfare does not care))
        3. ancient
          ancient 8 August 2020 13: 31
          +6
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          No one will be ahead of the curve, especially while B1B is in international airspace

          Probably everything has already been forgotten and the tactics of maintaining the IA database?
          Already at the opening of a b / o with the threat of striking our territory and even in the presence of our IA, the latter have every right to "send him .. feed the fish" in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk or wherever the carrier is "caught".
          The main and priority task is the destruction of the CARRIER, and not chasing AKP.
          The launches are always carried out with an interval ... at least 5-7 seconds ... so after the first descent, turn your nose and press the BC and put it out of the cannon ... it's the same 5-6 seconds.
          For this, they are accompanied when they discover ... whatever .. "stupid things with a fool" have not done soldier
      2. Senka naughty
        Senka naughty 8 August 2020 05: 07
        -4
        Do you think the three of them will have to wait until he "starts" everything?

        How is the weather in the baltics?
      3. Stalllker
        Stalllker 10 August 2020 19: 16
        0
        Of course they would not wait, after the first rocket it would be "cut into metal"
    2. PSih2097
      PSih2097 8 August 2020 10: 41
      +2
      And how many fighters are NATO countries raising to escort / intercept our bombers?
    3. ancient
      ancient 8 August 2020 13: 34
      +2
      Quote: Lt. air force reserve
      To intercept such a number of missiles, you need to have a lot of firepower, hence the 3 Su-35S

      No ... just the command of the Aerospace Forces read our past criticism about the fact that the "last pair" of B-1 ... they missed .... unaccompanied .. "wander" and correctly perceived the criticism ....... raised immediately one for the escort and a pair, then for amplification ... or vice versa ... a pair at once, and then another ... for amplification ... so it turned out 3 wink
  3. Observer2014
    Observer2014 7 August 2020 22: 04
    +4
    Experts discuss why three Su-1 fighters went up to intercept the B-35B Lancer of the USAF
    And what are the global standards for intercepting strategic bombers of potential partners near their borders? laughing I wanted to ... How do we know all the details. Maybe he's a B-1B On the "tail" that was supposed to be in the air? How do we know all the details.
    1. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii 7 August 2020 22: 23
      +8
      No, just one idiot was ready to meet three handsome men with bread and salt, and he was confused and complained about our bakery industry. yes
    2. Fitter65
      Fitter65 7 August 2020 23: 03
      18
      Quote: Observer2014
      And what are the global standards for intercepting strategic bombers of potential partners near their borders?

      The commissioning of young people who came in the spring is better than a real goal. Moreover, such an occasion happened ...
      1. iouris
        iouris 7 August 2020 23: 33
        +8
        For escort (and not for interception), only trained crews of the 1st and 2nd class fly out. The composition of the forces on duty: steam at 5 minutes and steam at 15 minutes.
        1. Fitter65
          Fitter65 8 August 2020 03: 57
          12
          Quote: iouris
          For escort (and not for interception), only trained crews of the 1st and 2nd class fly out. The composition of the forces on duty: steam at 5 minutes and steam at 15 minutes.

          I know. About the composition and purpose of the forces and means on duty, as well as when and how they are used, how they are increased, etc. etc. For almost 32 years he served in the Air Force ...
        2. ancient
          ancient 8 August 2020 13: 52
          +2
          Quote: iouris
          The composition of the duty forces: steam in 5 minutes and steam in 15 minutes.

          Write indiscriminately and not correctly, because
          There are 3 degrees of BG 1,2 and 3.
          If everything is "quiet" and the command post does not bring anything, then we sit in BG 2 and BG-3.
          With a "signal", transfer to BG-1 and BG-2, respectively ....... and so, we sit, changing after 40 minutes, they can cause a "gain" for another couple or a link ".... and so on for now" will not settle down. " wink
          If the command is "Air", then takeoff in pairs or singly from BG-1 - 2 minutes, from BG-2 - 8 minutes, from BG-3 12 minutes ....... at night a minute is added to any standard.
          But if the command "Air" found it on the "transition" from BG-2 to BG-1 (i.e. you are not yet in the cabin with belts fastened, with power on, started by APA and exposed IC), then 4 minutes for singles and 5 minutes for a couple. soldier
          1. Cap.nemo58rus
            Cap.nemo58rus 8 August 2020 19: 52
            0
            I don't know how it is in videoconferencing, but actually there are 4 degrees of BG. Are ground ones different from the Military Space?
            1. ancient
              ancient 9 August 2020 19: 06
              +1
              Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus
              I don't know how it is at the videoconferencing,

              You know ... I served the same only in the Air Force and had nothing to do with the "cosmanauts" soldier this is the first.
              Second - you are talking about the degrees of the BG of the Armed Forces of the country, and we are "talking" about the specifics .. the organization and parameters of carrying out Combat Duty. In accordance with the Statute of the IA DB.
              Well, all the servicemen are in constant readiness anyway, why should this .. "mention"? wink
              1. Aag
                Aag 9 August 2020 20: 21
                0
                "Well, all the servicemen are already in constant readiness" ...
                belay
                1. ancient
                  ancient 10 August 2020 12: 20
                  0
                  Quote: AAG
                  "Well, all servicemen are in constant readiness anyway."

                  Well, since this is .. "news" for you, then I dare to suggest two options:
                  1. In the SA and the Navy "last time" never served. wink
                  2. Received the title of "storeroom" due to the end of any department of military training in any university wink
                  In this regard, I hereby "report" soldier (I recommend to outline wink )
                  The Russian Armed Forces have the following levels of combat readiness:

                  Combat readiness "constant" - the daily state of the troops, manning with personnel, weapons, armored vehicles and transport, provision of all types of materiel and capable of going into combat readiness "increased", "military danger" and "full" within the time limit set for them.

                  Units and subunits are located in places of permanent deployment. Combat training is organized according to the combat training plan, classes are held according to the training schedule, strict adherence to the daily routine, maintaining high discipline, all this has a significant impact on the level of combat readiness in peacetime.

                  About other degrees of BG "educational program" there is no time to engage in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, with respect hi
                  1. Fitter65
                    Fitter65 10 August 2020 13: 25
                    +1
                    Quote: ancient
                    Combat readiness "constant" - the daily state of the troops, manning with personnel, weapons, armored vehicles and transport, provision of all types of materiel and capable of going into combat readiness "increased", "military danger" and "full" within the specified time period.

                    Yes, in principle, as it was 5 years ago, it has remained, just the signals of the combat alert have changed a little, and some of the activities when moving from one degree to another have slightly changed. But the basis of any readiness is to check for the compliance of all documents / orders / instructions, to make sure that each military officer / employee has instructions on what to do in case of being brought in, and this is not that pathetic sign that was placed in a wallet with an identity card, but such a voluminous notebook of the format A4, and the higher the position, the more of these "instructions" ...
                  2. Aag
                    Aag 11 August 2020 16: 45
                    0
                    [Quote] [/ quote]
                    I spent more than an hour sprinkling an answer for you, - flew away ... I'll try to duplicate ...
                  3. Aag
                    Aag 14 August 2020 06: 34
                    0
                    Quote: ancient
                    Quote: AAG
                    "Well, all servicemen are in constant readiness anyway."

                    Well, since this is .. "news" for you, then I dare to suggest two options:
                    1. In the SA and the Navy "last time" never served. wink
                    2. Received the title of "storeroom" due to the end of any department of military training in any university wink
                    In this regard, I hereby "report" soldier (I recommend to outline wink )
                    The Russian Armed Forces have the following levels of combat readiness:

                    Combat readiness "constant" - the daily state of the troops, manning with personnel, weapons, armored vehicles and transport, provision of all types of materiel and capable of going into combat readiness "increased", "military danger" and "full" within the time limit set for them.

                    Units and subunits are located in places of permanent deployment. Combat training is organized according to the combat training plan, classes are held according to the training schedule, strict adherence to the daily routine, maintaining high discipline, all this has a significant impact on the level of combat readiness in peacetime.

                    About other degrees of BG "educational program" there is no time to engage in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, with respect hi

                    Sorry, our comment was forced to interrupt in reply ...
                    To summarize briefly, your statement about the "permanent BG of the military servicemen" was jarring. Especially against the background of the rest of your balanced comments ... drinks Do not get excited with the "educational program", - I finished a completely normal VVUZ, in normal times. I managed to serve a little, - from the moment of the destruction of the "Pioneers" (launches!) - the reception from the industry and the setting on experimental combat duty of the "Topol", and, almost , - before replacing them with "Yars" ... By the way, if you type "troops of constant combat readiness" in a search engine, only the Strategic Missile Forces will fall out repeat
                    Respectfully yours, chief of the reserve, preparation and launch team. hi
                    1. ancient
                      ancient 14 August 2020 13: 04
                      0
                      Quote: AAG
                      To summarize briefly, your statement about the "permanent BG of the military servicemen"

                      These are claims against the RF Ministry of Defense wink
                      1. Aag
                        Aag 14 August 2020 15: 36
                        0
                        Quote: ancient
                        Quote: AAG
                        To summarize briefly, your statement about the "permanent BG of the military servicemen"

                        These are claims against the RF Ministry of Defense wink

                        Probably some regular press secretary? Well, let's not repeat after them, they are now at every step psakat together with the media! hi
        3. TT62o
          TT62o 9 August 2020 20: 25
          +1
          In what years were 5 minutes and 15? And even in pairs.
  4. agoran
    agoran 7 August 2020 22: 05
    +2
    Generally, "strategists" do not fly without cover.
    So, it's not a fact that there were no other goals there.
    Well, the journalists published what they were told.
    1. Grits
      Grits 8 August 2020 01: 35
      +2
      Quote: agoran
      Generally, "strategists" do not fly without cover.

      Apparently, all the "strategist's" cover fighters fell into the sea before reaching the Kuriles. Because the Americans did not know that the Sea of ​​Okhotsk was far away and there was not enough gasoline.
  5. ul_vitalii
    ul_vitalii 7 August 2020 22: 11
    +8
    So what, on one snout, there were three counter-snouts. The usual routine. Combat duty.
  6. agoran
    agoran 7 August 2020 22: 23
    -2
    Remember the large-scale CIA operation when a South Korean Boeing was shot down?
    By the way, the PIC on him was a major of the South Korean Air Force.
    So, perhaps the mattress makers are trying to probe the possibilities for a new provocation.
    1. iouris
      iouris 7 August 2020 23: 36
      0
      Quote: agoran
      Remember a large-scale CIA operation

      Remember. It is believed that this operation was carried out so that the USSR would later be easier to dissolve. Then there was Rust.
  7. sergo1914
    sergo1914 7 August 2020 22: 25
    +1
    For Russians, three is a symbolic number. Realized for three. In classic Russian ice hockey, transfer to third is dessert.
    1. Rusland
      Rusland 7 August 2020 22: 34
      0
      I don't know, buddy. Here Afonya, in the film of the same name, violated this tradition and thundered with it all over the country. smile
      1. sergo1914
        sergo1914 7 August 2020 22: 58
        +8
        Quote: Rusland
        I don't know, buddy. Here Afonya, in the film of the same name, violated this tradition and thundered with it all over the country. smile




        Afonya is a movie with a double bottom. Again, the movie. The third is ALWAYS drawn.
        PS I was at a distant dacha. We went with a neighbor to the store. 12 km, difficult to walk. On the way back we stopped halfway. For small talk. Only spilled, behind - BBC. Neighbor classmate. South of the Arkhangelsk region. There are more bears than people. Planida. They don't drink vodka together.
        1. Rusland
          Rusland 15 August 2020 19: 40
          +3
          Shake hands tightly, buddy. yes
          Was in those parts, Plesetsk, Mirny.
          1. sergo1914
            sergo1914 15 August 2020 20: 54
            +1
            Quote: Rusland
            Shake hands tightly, buddy. yes
            Was in those parts, Plesetsk, Mirny.


            To the south. A little further south.
  8. Cyril G ...
    Cyril G ... 7 August 2020 22: 29
    +7
    What is not clear here? At the Yasny airport, a Su-35 flight is on duty. It seems like three judging by the photo.

    All three took off. After all, entertainment ...
    1. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 7 August 2020 22: 42
      +7
      Quote: Cyril G ...
      All three took off. After all, entertainment ...

      That's right! Not every day "Lancers" come to the border ... and not "a lot"! request And everyone wants to practice! yes Remember how he looks in the scope! soldier
      1. Lt. Air Force stock
        Lt. Air Force stock 7 August 2020 23: 29
        +1
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        That's right! Not every day "Lancers" come to the border ... and not "a lot"! And everyone wants to practice! Remember how he looks in the scope!

        Then the Americans will declare that our fighters were flying round dances unsafe around one single B1B. Oh, and they will definitely declare about non-professionalism.
    2. AlexVas44
      AlexVas44 8 August 2020 08: 12
      +1
      Quote: Cyril G ...
      All three took off. After all, entertainment ...

      Show yourself and see others ... hi soldier
  9. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 7 August 2020 22: 30
    +9
    Power has nothing to do with it. Military pilots need experience and flying hours, as well as knowledge of their region.
  10. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 7 August 2020 22: 30
    +2
    Amused, the Americans are challenging something there. Then let them consider each overflight of our strategic aviation off the coast of their northernmost state as a challenge by us to the US sovereignty over Alaska. For this reason, many in the military feel a special positive. crying
  11. Alex_K
    Alex_K 7 August 2020 22: 32
    -7
    “In the end, it happened: after the appearance of the Su-35 B-1B, the Lancer began to move further from the Russian borders.” Can anyone really think in their head that if it were not for these 35s, he would have flown further across the entire territory of the Russian Federation. Sheer nonsense, he would have turned away the same way and not at all because of the dryers ... But then there would be no reason for this pathos ...
    1. agoran
      agoran 7 August 2020 22: 36
      +5
      And what if the navigation failure and the B-1 were filled with air defense?
      Paphos would be?
      1. Alex_K
        Alex_K 7 August 2020 22: 47
        -1
        I focused only on how the author of the article manipulates the mind of the man in the street: B1 turned away from the borders, only thanks to the appearance of 3 dryers. But this is sheer nonsense.
        1. agoran
          agoran 7 August 2020 22: 55
          0
          The article reads: "We decided to demonstrate the power of the Russian military aviation, which is capable of forcing the bomber crew to change course."
          In fact, fighters can force a strategist to change course if he goes without cover. I see no contradictions.
          Also mattress covers did not allow taking pictures of the aircraft carrier Tu-22R,
      2. sergo1914
        sergo1914 7 August 2020 23: 02
        +5
        Quote: agoran
        And what if the navigation failure and the B-1 were filled with air defense?
        Paphos would be?


        What for? We got up on the afterburner in front of the face three of us. Will definitely crash. Air Defense is a serious organization. She cannot be disturbed over trifles. Especially on Fridays.
        1. agoran
          agoran 7 August 2020 23: 11
          +2
          This is not the right decision.
          Pair in front of the muzzle, catch in a satellite, tritium from behind on a safety net.
          Something like that.
          1. sergo1914
            sergo1914 7 August 2020 23: 41
            +3
            Quote: agoran
            This is not the right decision.
            Pair in front of the muzzle, catch in a satellite, tritium from behind on a safety net.
            Something like that.

            I understood you. For what minus - I do not know. Literate people suggested putting Rust down like this. One plane. My classmate was then sitting at the guidance panel. Would come out, he says, threw a regular hammer in the lobovukha ... solved other issues.

            PS On the other hand, the flyers did not consider a target smaller than the B-52 as a target. A trifle - air defense, for us - dessert.
        2. iouris
          iouris 7 August 2020 23: 38
          +2
          Quote: sergo1914
          She cannot be disturbed over trifles. Especially on Fridays.

          Tom Sawyer also considered Friday a bad day.
          1. sergo1914
            sergo1914 7 August 2020 23: 46
            +2
            Quote: iouris
            Quote: sergo1914
            She cannot be disturbed over trifles. Especially on Fridays.

            Tom Sawyer also considered Friday a bad day.


            It remains to find out the opinion of Huck and Indian Joe.
    2. Grits
      Grits 8 August 2020 01: 39
      +3
      Quote: Alex_K
      “In the end, this is what happened: after the appearance of the Su-35 B-1B, Lancer began to move further from the Russian borders.

      Being in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, when turning in any direction, you will still approach to the Russian borders.
      1. Sandor Clegane
        Sandor Clegane 8 August 2020 07: 50
        +1
        Quote: Gritsa
        you will still approach the Russian borders.

        good drinks hence he laid Nesterov's loop))
  12. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 7 August 2020 22: 37
    +5
    The simplest explanation is that an experienced pilot was training young animals. An excellent excuse, and not a training goal ... increased adrenaline (norepinephrine, if correct), such a flight is worth counting for two, or even three ...
  13. Roman 4912
    Roman 4912 7 August 2020 22: 38
    0
    They scared them off, and at the same time trained the pilots. The Yankees will now think that they are very much afraid, that as many as three are being sent to intercept.
    1. A good one
      A good one 7 August 2020 22: 48
      0
      They indicated their presence, yes. But what colossus was involved, from the moment of detection, to targeting.
  14. Camrad
    Camrad 7 August 2020 23: 11
    +7
    B-1B is a very rare target for our air defense, therefore it is always used to train as many interceptor pilots as possible.
  15. Kaw
    Kaw 8 August 2020 00: 02
    -2
    A month or two ago, the American B-1 flew over the same route and no one met them there. In fact, they flew into the Russian military harbor and left unnoticed (or did not have time to react). Perhaps that is why such a violent reaction. When our carcasses fly to the American shores, someone is always there to meet them.
    In addition, the bombers could be accompanied by the F-22, which until you fly up, you will not see them.

    https://vpk.name/news/404404_b-1b_lancer_vvs_ssha_proleteli_v_polusotne_km_ot_byvshei_bazy_podlodok_na_kurilah.html
    1. Kaw
      Kaw 8 August 2020 00: 06
      -3

      MAY 22, 2020
      The American media came out with materials that describe the flight of 2 strategic bombers of the US Air Force B-1B Lancer "in the backyard of Russia." This is the language used by the American press. Where exactly did the American supersonic “strategists” make their flight?
      It turns out that B-1B performed a flight in airspace over the Sea of ​​Okhotsk.
      American information sources describe the situation as follows:
      The B-1B strategic bombers carried out a global mission, during which, as trackers show, they took unprecedented steps. They entered the airspace over the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, which is surrounded on three sides by the territory of Russia.
      The Drive wrote that it was the “most daring” flight of US strategic bombers in the region over the past 15 years.
      In the United States, they note that such flights are carried out as part of the new strategic mission DFE (Dynamic Force Employment). Earlier, the US Air Force said that such a mission includes a change in the course of strategic aviation already in flight - receiving new input from the command. That is why, as they say in the US, such missions are "less predictable for a potential adversary."
      It is known that a pair of B-1B Lancer took off from Andersen Air Base, located on the island of Guam. After that, they headed for Alaska, and then towards Japan. During the “Japanese” stage of their flight, US Air Force strategic bombers turned into airspace over the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, which the US press called the “entry into the backyard of Russia.” The flight took place in the Kuril Islands. At one point in the flight, American strategic bombers were about fifty kilometers from the Kuril island of Simushir. Previously, the island was a Soviet submarine base. The base was closed already in the time of the Russian Federation - in 1994.

      https://vpk.name/news/404404_b-1b_lancer_vvs_ssha_proleteli_v_polusotne_km_ot_byvshei_bazy_podlodok_na_kurilah.html
      1. Grits
        Grits 8 August 2020 01: 43
        +1
        That is why there should be a base in the center of the Kuriles, somewhere on Matua. At least with a minimum of aircraft and air defense
  16. shinobi
    shinobi 8 August 2020 03: 25
    +2
    A regular training flight to intercept. So it was. The leader + the slave, at some distance the "cameraman" shoots the "carousel." From our side, the guidance stations are all. In the 300s, they began to fly one at a time and then not always. They saved and other nishtyaki of the fucking 90s. A couple always flies to intercept. The Lancers stood idle for a long time, so they sent another one, see what and how ... For a detailed shooting. Specialists can tell a lot only by the shape of the exhaust and the flaps. Why are they alarmed?
  17. Senka naughty
    Senka naughty 8 August 2020 05: 02
    +1
    At the same time, the flight there by the Americans is usually carried out in the airspace between certain islands of the Kuril ridge - so that the air borders of the Russian Federation are not violated. At the same time, with such flights, the United States is trying to make it clear that it is ready to challenge Russian sovereignty over the Kuriles, from which Japan is experiencing a special positive.


    Today I scratched myself in a not decent place, I will ask the authors of the local spill, to mention this as my desire to challenge Russian sovereignty over the Kuriles.
  18. Senka naughty
    Senka naughty 8 August 2020 05: 10
    -1
    Experts discuss

    Who are these not smart people, show me them and I will tear them like a hot water bottle.
  19. askort154
    askort154 8 August 2020 07: 53
    +1
    According to the NTSUO, the US Air Force B-1B Lancer strategic bomber entered the airspace over the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. At the same time, it is emphasized that the American aircraft did not violate Russian air borders.

    It's strange. The airspace of Russia is determined by its borders!
    Since 2014, the UN has recognized the Sea of ​​Okhotsk as the internal sea of ​​Russia, which means that the airspace above it also belongs to Russia. An unambiguous answer
    I haven't found it yet.
  20. Hermit21
    Hermit21 8 August 2020 08: 55
    0
    And then mom called these experts to eat
  21. Cypa
    Cypa 8 August 2020 09: 12
    -1
    Quote: Senka Naughty
    Do you think the three of them will have to wait until he "starts" everything?

    How is the weather in the baltics?

    Your bit card, Major Jones! The water temperature in the Baltics is +7 degrees. "Big change"
  22. Oleg Zatsepin
    Oleg Zatsepin 8 August 2020 10: 58
    0
    Elementary Watson. If you practice intercepting and launching at the target, at the moment, three can, so let there be three. Seven - so seven. Normal math. Let's go next.
  23. Old26
    Old26 8 August 2020 15: 15
    +2
    Quote: Kaw
    In fact, they flew into the Russian military harbor.

    Without violating the Russian state border? I wonder how?

    Quote: askort154
    It's strange. The airspace of Russia is determined by its borders!
    Since 2014, the UN has recognized the Sea of ​​Okhotsk as the internal sea of ​​Russia, which means that the airspace above it also belongs to Russia. An unambiguous answer
    I haven't found it yet.

    This has already been discussed many times. Inland Sea - concerns only the seabed and the economic zone, where other countries cannot conduct economic activities without the permission of Russia. Water space, and even more so air over such an internal sea, is not the territory of Russia and the state borders are defined by a 12-mile zone of territorial waters. "Lancer" even entered the Okhotsk Sea in a place where the distance between the islands is about 60 km. That is, between them there is almost 15 kilometers of neutral (international) space ...
  24. av58
    av58 8 August 2020 15: 59
    +1
    In my opinion, the explanation is very simple: B-1B does not appear near our borders very often, and we need to have time to test as many Russian fighter pilots as possible on it.
  25. TermNachTer
    TermNachTer 8 August 2020 16: 24
    -1
    Well, so it is not superfluous for anyone to practice intercepting a real target.
  26. Ngauro
    Ngauro 9 August 2020 11: 04
    0
    damn, I want to be an expert. Carry with a clever look any nonsense and receive money
  27. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 10 August 2020 10: 59
    0
    I don't think that three Su-35s were raised for show-off, so it was necessary. The RF Ministry of Defense knows what they are doing ...
  28. Dikson
    Dikson 10 August 2020 19: 12
    0
    Yes, they wanted to take it into a box, drive it into our airspace and even press it to the ground for violating ..)))
  29. Simeon Nepomniachtchi
    Simeon Nepomniachtchi 11 August 2020 15: 10
    0
    It's simple. One fighter was lifted from Iturup, carried out the task, further on fuel could not go further, if the bomber went too far to the north, they raised a pair from the north on the oncoming course to the bombers, so that without interrupting the task, the first su-35 could safely return ...
  30. Aag
    Aag 11 August 2020 18: 04
    0
    Quote: ancient
    Quote: AAG
    "Well, all servicemen are in constant readiness anyway."

    Well, since this is .. "news" for you, then I dare to suggest two options:
    1. In the SA and the Navy "last time" never served. wink
    2. Received the title of "storeroom" due to the end of any department of military training in any university wink
    In this regard, I hereby "report" soldier (I recommend to outline wink )
    The Russian Armed Forces have the following levels of combat readiness:

    Combat readiness "constant" - the daily state of the troops, manning with personnel, weapons, armored vehicles and transport, provision of all types of materiel and capable of going into combat readiness "increased", "military danger" and "full" within the time limit set for them.

    Units and subunits are located in places of permanent deployment. Combat training is organized according to the combat training plan, classes are held according to the training schedule, strict adherence to the daily routine, maintaining high discipline, all this has a significant impact on the level of combat readiness in peacetime.

    About other degrees of BG "educational program" there is no time to engage in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, with respect hi

    Let's be respectful to those people who are not directly related to the Armed Forces, but would like to link their fate with them, or at least are not indifferent to the fate of the Armed Forces, and the country as a whole? I myself am, sometimes emotional ... But let's try to be more attentive to "interlocutors"? Well, and, in his own words: "... all servicemen are in a permanent BG ..". I had a chance to be a teacher of the OVS, ("Fundamentals of military service" in some ... lyceums, universities ..) I assure you, there would be a student, cadet, listener who would ask on Vsh opus: "And if I'm on a pot, on Baba (sorry), on vacation, in a hospital .. "I realize that the BU (Combat Regulations) of any type of aircraft is a document, at least a secret document.
    1. Aag
      Aag 11 August 2020 18: 18
      0
      I will continue, allow me. Step by step (in order to preserve information) .... & 5 [quote = AAG] [quote = ancient] [quote = AAG] "Well, all military personnel are already in constant readiness" .. [/ quote]
      Well, since this is .. "news" for you, then I dare to suggest two options:
      1. In the SA and the Navy "last time" never served. wink
      2. Received the title of "storeroom" due to the end of any department of military training in any university wink
      In this regard, I hereby "report" soldier (I recommend to outline wink )
      The Russian Armed Forces have the following levels of combat readiness:

      Combat readiness "constant" - the daily state of the troops, manning with personnel, weapons, armored vehicles and transport, provision of all types of materiel and capable of going into combat readiness "increased", "military danger" and "full" within the time limit set for them.

      Units and subunits are located in places of permanent deployment. Combat training is organized according to the combat training plan, classes are held according to the training schedule, strict adherence to the daily routine, maintaining high discipline, all this has a significant impact on the level of combat readiness in peacetime.

      About other degrees of BG "educational program" there is no time to engage in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, with respect hi[/ Quote]
      Let's be respectful to those people who are not directly related to the Armed Forces, but would like to link their fate with them, or at least are not indifferent to the fate of the Armed Forces, and the country as a whole? I myself am, sometimes emotional ... But let's try to be more attentive to "interlocutors"? Well, and, in his own words: "... all servicemen are in the permanent BG ..". I had a chance to be a teacher of the OVS, ("Fundamentals of military service" in some ... lyceums, universities ..) I assure you, there would be a student, cadet, listener who would ask on Vsh opus: "And if I'm on a pot, on Baba (sorry), on vacation, in a hospital .. "I realize that the BU (Combat Regulations) of any type of aircraft is a document, at least a secret document. [/ qu