Putin did not rule out the possibility of nominating for a new term

One of the presidential statements discussed today is devoted to new presidential terms. Recall that earlier, from the rostrum of the State Duma, an initiative was voiced about the so-called “zeroing” of the deadlines after voting on numerous amendments to the Constitution of the country — it was voiced by Valentina Tereshkova. This initiative has already managed to make a lot of noise.

Today, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that he does not exclude the possibility of running for the next presidential term if the amendments to the Basic Law are finally adopted.

The head of state made such a statement on the air of the Russia 1 TV channel.

At the same time, Putin added that he had not yet made a final decision for himself, but still did not exclude the possibility of running for president.

In addition, the head of state said that if the adoption of the relevant amendment (on “zeroing out” the term of the presidency) does not happen, then after two years "instead of normal work, yawing will begin in search of possible successors." Putin noted that he knows about such “yaw” from his own experience, and officials at various levels are engaged in “yaw”.

According to the president of the country, he personally firmly believes in the correctness of the adoption of amendments to the Constitution, since the current Basic Law was adopted in a “difficult period - when Tanks shot at parliament. ” In this regard, it is difficult to say what period in stories Our country of recent decades can be called simple.

A few days earlier, the head of state said that the majority of Russians supported the introduction of amendments.

Comments

[Incvizitor]

I never voted for him, but now seeing how all the dirt is writhing from him, I’m thinking of voting.

[Same lech]

But I voted for him ... there were no more presidential contenders of this magnitude.
And so far no one has been seen on the horizon who could reach for the presidency with him.

[Svarog]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

And so far no one has been seen on the horizon who could reach for the presidency with him.

And it won’t be observed .. as long as he will rule .. he doesn’t need competitors .. he’s afraid of debate ..

[Lexus]

there were no more presidential candidates of this magnitude.
And until it is observed on the horizon

The wardrobe of any bad housewife is teeming with them.

his competitors are not nuny .. he’s afraid of debate ..

Debates should be conducted with an opponent, not with a friend - the questions will be non-posed, and most likely uncomfortable. Will constantly stutter and cough. Secondly, having gathered in the "autocrats", you need to rise above everyone, otherwise they will not believe in "divinity" and the letter "u" will be deservedly added.

[Ilya-spb]

In the days of doubt and painful reflection, I decided to support Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin.

I weighed two things.

1) the amendments to the Constitution themselves. Many are very necessary.
I like the ban on dual citizenship for officials and the ban on cash accounts abroad.
I support the priority of Russian law over international, even through a constitutional court.

2) I observed almost the entire quarantine of the angry statements of a number of fellow citizens, turning into hysteria. They are based on the following points:

- amendments are being made to nullify Putin’s presidential terms.
- it is necessary to prohibit / boycott the vote because the people decide nothing / the government falsifies everything.

I have weighed everything. Opponents of the vote for amendments criticize only one amendment - about zeroing the deadlines. About the others - they say almost nothing.

Opponents of the amendments are not confident in the people. For me, this last thing is to not be sure of the ability of our people to reason and think freely.

Our people remember the waste of Perestroika-Catastrophe, the "dashing nineties", and the permanent financial crisis. By the way, under Putin there is no such inflation as in the 90s. Let me remind you this too.

Therefore - I’ll go to vote. And I will say yes to the amendments.

And that's why I support the amendments. I do not want a repeat of either 1917 or 1991.

Russia needs a quiet development.

[Sahalinets]

Yeah, man! For 20 years your idol has steered the country and it is necessary, we are again in a critical situation!

[Lexus]

Yeah, man!

Colleague , while reading that epic, I immediately remembered the works of the "officer's daughter". Like a blueprint scribbled. "I never, but nevertheless always ..."

[A good one]

Quote: lexus

Yeah, man!

Colleague , while reading that epic, I immediately remembered the works of the "officer's daughter". Like a blueprint scribbled. "I never, but nevertheless always ..."

My joy I look perebulsya I won’t give the pipe, the horse and the wife to anyone, I started to look from the horse, who is next? A piece of wood or a wife?

[Shurik70]

And I always voted for Putin, because I thought that the alternatives were worse.
But this "zeroing" disappointed me in him. Too frank mockery of the law. Looks like he lost his grip.
In the elections I will be against him. But for whom - I don’t know yet. We will see.

[smart ass]

Do you like the pension reform?

[Simargl]

Quote: Clever man

Do you like the pension reform?

What exactly? Age would be sold anyway. Do you know that it is not necessary that the president approve the adoption of the law? And he signature must to deliver, in accordance with the Constitution, in a certain case, otherwise all sorts of impeachments, etc.

[victor50]

Quote: Simargl

And he is obliged to put a signature, according to the Constitution, in a certain case, otherwise all sorts of impeachments, etc.

Where did you hear that? Explicitly not read.

[Simargl]

Quote: victor50

Explicitly not read.

Was reading. And you read.

 Constitution of the Russian Federation

Quote: Article 107

1. The adopted federal law is sent to the President of the Russian Federation for five days for signing and promulgation.
2. The President of the Russian Federation, within fourteen days, signs the federal law and promulgates it.
3. If the President of the Russian Federation rejects it within fourteen days from the date of receipt of the federal law, the State Duma and the Council of the Federation shall again consider this law in the manner established by the Constitution of the Russian Federation. If, upon reconsideration, the federal law is approved as previously adopted by a majority of at least two-thirds of the total number of members of the Federation Council and deputies of the State Duma, he subject to signing by the President of the Russian Federation within seven days and making it public.

[Revival]

There is such a Boris here, so he pushes it to the point of madness.
So we already discussed this and took it apart! Five times! Especially at the time of signing a retirement ..
That's it!
The president is not obliged to sign anything, in a situation when the thought persists, just the duma is ultimately not good.
That correspondence was not preserved (I copied), but there is a similar dispute with Boris about the prime minister and the Duma and the president, all about the president’s same duty to come to terms and sign!
And the reality (constitution) is somewhat different:

"Art. 111 After the State Duma rejects the nominated candidates for the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation three times, the President of the Russian Federation appoints the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation, dissolves the State Duma and appoints new elections.
Art. The President of the Russian Federation may decide to resign the Government of the Russian Federation.

3. The State Duma may express no confidence in the Government of the Russian Federation. A resolution of no confidence in the Government of the Russian Federation is adopted by a majority vote of the total number of deputies of the State Duma. After the State Duma expresses no confidence in the Government of the Russian Federation, the President of the Russian Federation has the right to declare the resignation of the Government of the Russian Federation or disagree with the decision of the State Duma. If the State Duma within three months re-expresses no confidence in the Government of the Russian Federation, the President of the Russian Federation shall announce the resignation of the Government or dissolve the State Duma. "

[Simargl]

Quote: Revival

And the reality (constitution) is somewhat different:
"Art. 111

And what about 107?

[flicker]

Quote: Revival
And the reality (constitution) is somewhat different:
"Art. 111
And what about 107?

Revival is still that connoisseur of law. He argued that in the amendments "the family is the union of a man and a woman," confusing family with marriage.
He asserted that the UN Security Council adopts resolutions on human rights, confusing it with the UN General Assembly.
---
Here also Art. 107, which regulates the procedure for adopting a federal law (which, under the Constitution, are obliged to comply with international standards), it contrasts art. 111, which deals with the president’s right to appoint a prime minister, once again: the prime minister, and not the adoption of the Federal Law.
---
Like, since he can push the prime minister by law, he can stop the adoption of the Federal Law on the basis of the same law.
---

[Simargl]

Quote: flicker

He contrasts Art. 111, which deals with the president’s right to appoint a prime minister, again:

Here, as I understand it, a pout attempt to protest my statement that

Quote: Simargl

he must sign, according to the Constitution, in a particular case, otherwise any impeachment etc.

There are very many at first minus, and then ... maybe ... deign to think.

[pereselenec]

Quote: Simargl

he must sign, according to the Constitution, in a certain case, otherwise all kinds of impeachments, etc.

If he doesn’t, then, of course, Obama will come with a Mauser and will shoot his head off. So it seems to you that they are being poured into the NOD?

[Simargl]

Quote: pereselenec

So it seems that they are being poured into your NOD?

I do not touch the NOD. I just read the Constitution for fun, I was a little surprised. So: Article 107 of the Constitution regulates this moment (obliges the president to sign).
You will learn to read in your incomprehensible camp (not GCD, as I understand it) (not only what I wrote).

[pereselenec]

Quote: Simargl

Quote: pereselenec

So it seems that they are being poured into your NOD?

I do not touch the NOD. I just read the Constitution for fun, I was a little surprised. So: Article 107 of the Constitution regulates this moment (obliges the president to sign).
You will learn to read in your incomprehensible camp (not GCD, as I understand it) (not only what I wrote).

Otherwise, Matvienko, Volodin and Tereshkova will impeach Putin, of course

[Simargl]

Quote: pereselenec

Matvienko, Volodin and Tereshkova

The President is a protege. You don’t know the story: both the pus-secs were displaced, and the kings fell down to the right and left.

[Nosgoth]

Here, many do not know how to read, in one word (EBNi) - "electorate". Sometimes one gets the impression that the number of schoolchildren - fans of Navalny here is growing exponentially every month.

[Shurik70]

Quote: Clever man

Do you like the pension reform?

Politicians who care about the people in the modern world are only in fairy tales (in the sense, in the movies). In reality, they take care of themselves. The last politician who cared for the people is Stalin. From that they still remember.
So the pension reform was an example of a skillful, sharp politician "within the law." Which will not let go of its own and (possibly) will improve the welfare of taxpayers.
Here is "zeroing" - a demonstration of losing grip and going beyond the law.

[Simargl]

Quote: Shurik70

Here is "zeroing" - a demonstration of losing grip and going beyond the law.

What are you grasping at "zeroing"? Well, don't vote for him - vote for Sobchak.
Decent, seemingly decent things are advertised, but in reality they either turn out to be harmful in general or will not work as they should. This is what matters.
These amendments are unnecessary. The constitution in its current form is quite normal compared to what they want to do with it ... even without "zeroing"

[akshor]

Here, simply every next villain will be reset to zero. Change the constitution. It is not normal. Yes, and you can always wind up votes, there is no faith in the results. Old Man will also gain 70%. But will so many vote for him? And so, there was the only opportunity to tear the person from the chair. And then they killed and trampled. Just wait, when they kick forward? Death is not fooled. But is that normal?

[Nosgoth]

Well, you have fantasies. Zeroing is being pushed only now. Then there are new referendums, etc. And, if you don't know, the people will vote for it. The machine cannot reset everyone. If the next prezik is supported by the majority, they will be reset to zero, but support for a couple of terms still needs to be earned. Now there is no particular choice, either what is, or clones of EBNi (kapitoshkins, bulkheads, breasts, etc.), and comparing with EBNa and VVP, I'd rather choose the "lesser of" evils "than to destroy the entire system, and shouting a hypocritical phrase (in our interpretation): "ZhLV - the lives of the liberd are important !!!" Some here will soon shout to the "Civil War, Part 2."

[Nosgoth]

Circus, and only ...

[Vadim237]

I don’t give a damn about working and doing my favorite thing until I glue the flippers. The longer a person works, the longer he lives.

[ApJlekuHo]

Read about pensions in the countries of Europe, for example, Sweden, you will be surprised. And the conditions under which it is possible to receive this pension are sometimes generally beyond the reasonable.

[Tugarin]

Quote: Shurik70

But this "zeroing" disappointed me in him. Too frank mockery of the law

[Vadim237]

No time for buildup, you need to build a water pump.

[ApJlekuHo]

Quote: Tugarin

Quote: Shurik70

But this "zeroing" disappointed me in him. Too frank mockery of the law

Why the hell is this baby talk here?

[Vadim237]

Well, what commentators are such babbling.

[Yury Siritsky]

Zeroing does not oblige you to vote only for Putin. Vote for whoever you want if a worthy candidate appears.

[akshor]

Voting does not guarantee turnover in Russia and Belarus. This time. Secondly, imagine your most unloved candidate wins or such as Yeltsin. And every time it is reset. And every time they help to win. And that’s it. And endure until his death. Do you want that? So that the villains seized power and nullified?

[Lexus]

I look perebulsya

Golovan, I just stayed with my own. But your "clear" epic did not work out from the very beginning. So they decided to revive the "good" option and blow "fresh exhaust" into the "rusland". I have no idea what this can be stabbed by doctors, so that the "accuser", boasting of his "masculinity", abruptly switched to "rear-wheel drive" and dressed in women's attire. So-so "Kerensky" turned out. Threatening, at the same time, shame for someone. It is clear that you spit on the amendment about marriage, but you still have to answer for the many-sidedness and rudeness in PM.

 Show / Hide text

https://topwar.ru/user/%D0%AF%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F/

Even sending is disgusting. Leaving alone with a mirror - come off.

[A good one]

Quote: lexus

I look perebulsya

Golovan, I just stayed with my own. But your "clear" epic did not work out from the very beginning. So they decided to revive the "good" option and blow "fresh exhaust" into the "rusland". I have no idea what this can be stabbed by doctors, so that the "accuser", boasting of his "masculinity", abruptly switched to "rear-wheel drive" and dressed in women's attire. So-so "Kerensky" turned out. Threatening, at the same time, shame for someone. It is clear that you spit on the amendment about marriage, but you still have to answer for the many-sidedness and rudeness in PM.

 Show / Hide text

https://topwar.ru/user/%D0%AF%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F/

Even sending is disgusting. Leaving alone with a mirror - come off.

What nonsense, thump something. I came from the dacha, went to VO, and here you are engaged in verbiage, call again, get down to business, calluses at your fingertips do not decorate the man, enough to force the keyboard. Do not grieve me, my joy.

[Ilya-spb]

Dude, for your information, this is a castrated ram. Did you want to insult me?

Did I write somewhere that Putin is my idol? Nowhere.

Congratulations to you, citizen, a lie!

[evgen1221]

Well, what is especially breakthrough made in the country? Well, yes, Crimea is there, Chechnya, pensions are good, of course, but we need to move on, but with this we have problems, in the sense that we were with naked women at the beginning of the zero so they came to the same women in 20 years. And of course, thanks for the pension my healthy peasant has to beg for money from his parents from retirement in order to survive in the province, because a lot of jobs as the guarantor promised didn’t appear, the prices for finishing work have been standing since the 14th year, and during that time everything went up 5 times in stores and by 7500 average hands sn in general unbeaten. Thank you Pu, goodbye. You did what you could, and I want to see another bronze king in every teapot.

[4ekist]

Whoever calculates your salary, ask him. For example, a hard worker earns 18000 rubles at a factory, and a director and a chief accountant each earn 1000000. And so everywhere: in education, medicine, and agriculture.

[evgen1221]

Dear opponent, I accrue salary to myself, because I work in finishing, the price tag is based on the average for the city region plus extra work, and these prices remained at 14m. Regarding the factory, you didn’t try to go to the regional center for 5000 km with 200 with a guarantee that there will be no bed in the hostel, which means that you have at least 30 t in your hands and it’s dishirak and water plus travel to work (this already passed), while with an RFP of 18t, for example, they will remove that there will be no more than 13t of which 8-10 housing and 3 less for doshirak. And what for goat button accordion then. And in the hometown, the average 10-12t according to the documents but 7-8t on hand. Bottom line, you have to change a lot in this ugly state or come to African countries. And so Pu dude is not bad, but you need to know the measure or at least establish a system of punishment for the inevitable for waste and failure of public affairs rather than transferring those who steal into other seats.

[4ekist]

Our treasury in the regions, already poor, is not paid because there is nothing to pay. In villages, the most solvent are grandmothers-pensioners. And how private business works for us, I know well, as in the days of wild capitalism. In addition, theft at all levels, tax evasion, salary in envelopes. And everyone wants good honey. service, social guarantees, earn (receive) good money. In the capital, nepotism is even worse than in the regions. It is necessary to change (take the best) tax, personnel, health, educational system. And, of course, do not forget about the punishment system.

[evgen1221]

Yes, a lot (everything) in our ugly kingdom must be put on its feet with ears. (((

[victor50]

Quote: 4ekist

For example, a hard worker earns 18000 rubles at a factory, and a director and a chief accountant each earn 1000000. And so everywhere: in education, medicine, and agriculture.

Are you from what state are you trying to tell us about our life ?! And - where is the medicine?

[evgen1221]

Dude, I'm not really angry with myself as much as with our ugly state. If until 17g one bathroom was made in a week and there was enough money for a month, now it doesn’t exist (ATP forbidding to work), and there is no other (adequate) work in the province - not counting the very damn thing (you’ll get the hell out of it), the fireman lived up to it. And at the same time, our government blames us for this whole mess, well, you see, they don’t want to work for a spoon of buckwheat for a new yacht.

[Vadim237]

"Yeah, dude! Your idol ruled the country for 20 years, and wow, we are in a critical situation again!" - And what is this "critical" situation in which you are in details?

[About 2]

Dear friend, we, in my opinion, did not crawl out of the crisis under the sun.

[Vadim237]

You just come up with crises on your own on the go

[Lexus]

I decided to support

Quoting a hackneyed manual? If there are pants, a candle or a night vase, then there are a lot of "truly patriotic" willing without you.

Our people remember the frenzy of Perestroika-Catastrophe, and the "dashing nineties", and the permanent financial crisis.

Developed countries need to be compared to complete the picture. And so, have arrived, already people and about the 90s, apparently from "a good and every time better life", are nostalgic. PZh is the successor of the destructive "intoxication" of Eltsin, this is already clear to all reasonable people ... It is useless to make heroes of 0.

[Sahalinets]

Yes, about the 90s is generally funny. Putin has been at the helm for 20 years, and his bots all fall on the 90s. Yes, a new thief has matured for a long time, and we are sitting on an oil needle, and we are sitting ...

[NordUral]

Who is sitting on the needle, I know, in general terms. But the fact that the country at the fifth point is settled in the majority can not reach. I read the comments and wonder.

[Serg72]

You make it easier! It is necessary to understand that your (comment, voice is not "counted"), because it is simply not understood ... Specifically, it is not correct that "the country is on the brink of an abyss?", Or that "people do not understand something" ... (sometimes I had up to a thousand employees, so the main thing in communication was to find Russian to communicate)
Right there about the "needle" - Without the "Needle" they are nobody, because without them everything will be tuned up and will work (outside their distribution), with the needle - all the possibilities of spending and theft ...

[NordUral]

And you suggest it to me easier to state? Read what you wrote then.

[Russia]

I agree, even Lexus changed his shoes, changed his horse with Marshal Zhukov to a red banner, now he doesn’t have a ball, and he’ll get denticles in a foot column. Restless Lexus, when to the front? I understand that Russia is like the Brest Fortress for you, but I don’t see traces of injuries, even abrasions on you, it’s good to lick ketchup off yourself.

[Vadim237]

I don’t know what kind of oil needle you are sitting on, but in Russia, from the entire economy, the oil and gas sect occupies 19% and the share in the budget is 30%.

[Serg72]

FAQ, FAQ ?? I’m not even going to get into my graphics sites ... You, baten.ka, from what? Yes, the numbers are laid down, but you must understand how our reporting is formed ... Anyone who is connected with IFRS ask, they will laugh in your forehead, for our heaps of all kinds of accounts, there are 50,60.1,62. and even a dozen - beyond the hillock - proto cash flow (well, differentiated) If there is a property in the family (wife, son, deceased under Lenin's grandmother) - give taxes, did not pay tax - IN PRISON! And we have? Where are the yields at a rate of return of 6-12 percent? The last and main question for you is HOW MANY THOUSAND years (yes, yes, there it is) the Rottenberg family would have earned their fortune, what do they have - ALREADY today?

[Overlock]

Quote: Vadim237

I don’t know what kind of oil needle you are sitting on, but in Russia, from the entire economy, the oil and gas sect occupies 19% and the share in the budget is 30%.

why bother then? To negotiate with Salman? Well her, oil, nafig! We have booming industry and the fall of the national currency due to oil - a mirage

[Vadim237]

A strong ruble is primarily unprofitable for exporters of all goods not only oil - and vice versa is not profitable for importers since their products in the domestic market will be significantly more expensive than their own will be an incentive to continue to create their own products.

[NordUral]

Do not bring nonsense, 237th! A weak and variable ruble exchange rate benefits oligarchs exporters and currency speculators.
And those whom we mistakenly call the state to fill the ruble budget.
A strong ruble is needed by the people and a strong State.

[Vadim237]

You are zero in the economy - that’s why you think that I am talking nonsense, but the fact that a weak ruble is beneficial to all producers in the country is certainly to me as an exporter, all the more so and I’m neither an oligarch nor a currency speculator.

[NordUral]

Most export enterprises do not work. And he buys everything at prices, taking into account the understated ruble exchange rate.
And this applies to those who are busy.
And for the common people, whose 95% low ruble in our country is so profitable, people are dancing with joy.
I worked in my free flight since the 89th, survived all the cataclysms and the hacks of the liberals. So address your notations to managers in offices.

[NordUral]

I, the 237th, am sitting on what I honestly earned. Modestly, but do not need. And these percentages are exactly the same as 76% for Putin in March 2018. Only with reverse polarity.

[Vadim237]

I am very happy for you - that you are sitting in the same place.

[NordUral]

You, apparently, did not understand me or you’re lying about Vanka, 237th. I personally am not at the fifth point.

[surok1]

I guess the user. Wishlist are not moderate.

[Voyager]

When did Russia live better than in the last 20 years?

[NordUral]

Who are you talking about, Andrey?

[krillon]

"No mind, no truth, no real power, not a single living idea. But with the help of what do they rule us? Only one explanation remains - with the help of our own stupidity."

[Deck]

I never voted for him, but now seeing how all the dirt is writhing from him, I’m thinking of voting.

Seeing all the dirt pulling to vote for him, I never voted for and will not.

[4ekist]

Previously, they voted for Ksyusha Sobchak or for the director of the collective farm, or ignore such events?

[Ingvar 72]

Quote: 4ekist

for the director of the collective farm

And what is wrong with the director of the collective farm? The accounts over the hill did not prove, but how much stench on the central TV was. Even Pamfilova was lying.

[4ekist]

And you go to this very collective farm (near the city of Vidnoe) and talk with people.

[Malyuta]

Quote: 4ekist

And you go to this very collective farm (near the city of Vidnoe) and talk with people.

When I go to Domodedovo Airport, I always visit the state farm of Lenin in no way negative about Grudinin from the locals.

[4ekist]

But I don’t hear anything good, it’s clear that we are communicating with different electorates.

[NordUral]

Naturally, the pro-Putin will not tell you anything good about Grudinin.

[NordUral]

Igor! And you don’t have to prove anything, everything is in plain sight and the village of Grudinsky, and the CJSC itself. And there is no point in discussing with the singers of these. Some are incurable, others earn.

[pereselenec]

Quote: 4ekist

Previously, they voted for Ksyusha Sobchak or for the director of the collective farm, or ignore such events?

The most ridiculous and miserable thing about Putin's horror stories about Ksyusha Sobchak is that even if Ksyusha Sobchak had been chosen, her mandate would have already come to an end and then another president could be chosen instead (the second after GDP, figure out how scary it sounds for Putinists) . Instead, a decrepit and out-of-mind Pu will remain who, with his friends Sechin, Rogozin, Vekselberg, Yakunin, Chubais, Gref, Nabiulina and Narusova, will finish Russia.

[Malyuta]

Quote: Deck

Seeing all the dirt pulling to vote for him, I never voted for and will not.

Comrade, in 99 I said that Geda should have taken such a "humanity" so that he would become the successor of Ebn and the guarantor of his family.
But in general, he was going to become the director of a taxi fleet in St. Petersburg and it would be better if he would have become his level, everything else is PR from what it was.

[surok1]

Yes, God did not ask you, to whom what fate to give?

[Ilya-spb]

Let me ask you a provocative question. I have the right. You mentioned that I am "quoting a hackneyed manual."

Would you please cite her output?

I, for your information, am a scientist and love when they point to the sources to which they refer.

[Same lech]

I, for your information, am a scientist and love when they point to the sources to which they refer.

Alas ... not all forum users possess your mentality of a scientist
Be lenient towards them.

[Lexus]

I, for your information, a scientist

It can be seen. What "scientists", such is science ... And vice versa.

love when sources indicate

Take a look at the comments of your colleagues, supporters of the pancreas and you will find "surprising similarities." As one fairy tale says - not all sources are equally useful - using some of them, you can become a kid.

[A good one]

Quote: lexus

"p ... not to the cashier"

Don't judge by yourself. I have no doubt that you are always "at the cash register", because you have "there", where Russian science is, not otherwise, the counters of "engine hours" and "mass consumption" are.

I am the author of several dozen international publications

No amount of "scientific works" and "beliefs" does not automatically make a person decent. But "decent ..." is quite himself. Which for the sake of 30 pieces of silver.

Lech, direct your energy to the well-being of your family, help the brother who this nickname has given you, you are here in VO as Lyokha Navalny. He’s at least from the State Department, and you’re someone from whom you are begging. If by itself, then respect you.

[snake]

Quote: Ilya-spb

I am the author of several dozen international publications adopted by foreign and buildings.

"And my surname, my surname is too well known that I would call her"

[Malyuta]

Quote: Ilya-spb

It can be seen that you "do not care" and if only "p ... not to the cashier." I am the author of several dozen international publications adopted by foreign and buildings.

About mutin?

[Ilya-spb]

No, in veterinary medicine.

[Aviator_]

Well, you are not the only one here. The Hirsch Index of publications is optional. What topics were published?

[Overlock]

Quote: Ilya-spb

I am the author of several dozen international publications adopted by foreign and buildings.

you need to be more modest I have 44 publications, including the cordon, and I do not scream

[Ilya-spb]

Hirsch is not measured. And a statement of modesty is inappropriate here.

For details about publications - I ask in PM.

[Navigator]

You didn’t get there. Here are people who adequately look at the world. Pass by.

[flicker]

For your information, a scientist also loves when they point to the sources to which they refer.

It "The last hundred " wrestlers with Putin's regime excited.

What are there links to sources.

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: Ilya-spb

I, for your information, am a scientist and love

Scientist, by whom - by what? Scientist, trained, taught ...

[gurzuf]

"Quoting a hackneyed manual" is a compelling argument.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Ilya-spb

Russia needs a quiet development.

Which Putin will never give her.

[Ilya-spb]

And who will give?

And what, do you personally do nothing for Russia? Does the development of the country not depend on your contribution, too?

[Sahalinets]

Manuals of the Kremlin troll. Everything is according to plan, according to the fad:
1. Our Crimea.
2. Did not try to work or try to work.
3. Raised from his knees, from the ruins. Which country went.
4. What have you done for the country? What would you do instead of Putin? If not
Putin, then who? There is no alternative.
5. A lot of things have been done for the country.
6. Begin with yourself.
7. Not all at once.
8. If not him, then who. There is no alternative.
9. Take away the porch, plant flowers, sweep the trash ... don’t spit
10. I work a lot, unlike you
11. It is necessary to work.
12. Do not provoke, provocateurs, talk out the situation.
13. Go abroad, no one is holding.
14. And the dissatisfied will always and everywhere.
15. But in the 90s ...
16. Give time ...
17. He - did you personally stole something?

[mark2]

METHOD OF CINDERING - non-living liberal

1. If foreigners build a plant at home - "Well, they could have built in Russia."
2. If foreigners are building a plant in Russia - "Now, if ours were built in Germany."
3. If ours are building a plant in Germany - "Well, they don’t build it at home."
4. If ours are building a plant at home - "All the same, this is a bourgeois plant, profits will go to the bourgeois."
5 Foreign policy:
6. Russia does not interfere in the affairs of Syria / Libya / Venezuela - “Russia has leaked”.
7. Russia intervenes in the affairs of Syria / Libya / Venezuela - "This is aggression and imperialism."
Reaction to international provocations:
8. Russia responds softly - "Snot chew."
9. Russia responds firmly - "The militarists are damn!".
10. Russia ignores - “Snot chew, militarists are damn!”.
Interaction with "civil society".
11. The West is investing in grants - "Soft power, we could learn."
12. Russia is investing in grants - "Cut, waste taxpayer money."
Trade in resources.
13. The West threatens to oust Russia from the gas market in Europe - "Putin is a wimp, nothing can be done."
14. Russia is ousting from the European gas market the United States - "Country gas station."
Chronicles of decline.
15. Ford closes a plant in Russia - "The poor Russians have no money for cars."
16. Ford closes plants in Europe / USA - diligently pretend that nothing is happening.
17. Ford declares itself bankrupt (this is already possible in the near future) - “In the post-industrial economy, nobody needs this outdated primitive industry.”
Finance.
18. Russia sterilizes surplus dollar weight in securities to avoid the Dutch disease - “Russia pays the colonial tribute to the USA”.
19. Russia is getting rid of treasure - “We have not yet figured out why, but it's still bad.”
Domestic elections.
20. The representative of "United Russia" wins - "The elections are falsified!"
21. The representative of any other party wins - “Aha! The people became disillusioned with the authorities! ”
Opposition.
22. Do not plant bulk - “Why do not this traitor plant?!”.
23. Bulk will be imprisoned - "The regime arranges political repression!".
24. Navalny will flee abroad - “Where is the FSB looking ?!”.
The fight against corruption.
25. Corruptionists are not imprisoned - “ПЖиВ! They stole everything! ”
26. Corruptionists are planted - “This is a redistribution of property, not shared.”
27. Corruptionists are actively imprisoned, despite their political affiliation - “This is political repression, 1937!”
Taxes.
28. Create preferential conditions for business - “You need to introduce a progressive tax!”.
29. Introduce new taxes for business - "Putin strangles entrepreneurs!".
Well, a set of common phrases suitable for all occasions.
30. It would be better if they handed out to pensioners.
31. Putin has passed the point of no return.
32. The Kremlin is in a panic.
33. The mode received a black mark.
34. Hey, damned guards!
35. In Russia, fascism! SUGS!
36. You are outside the Moscow Ring Road!
37. The system is moving toward an inevitable collapse.
38. Klassenkampf uber alles! Klasov’s fight!
39. The Kuril Islands are given, Siberia was sold to the Chinese, they drank Baikal, they cut down the taiga.
40. Putin has cornered himself.
(A. Rogers)

[flicker]

METHOD OF CINDERING - non-living liberal

1. If foreigners build a plant at home - "Well, they could have built in Russia."
2. If foreigners are building a plant in Russia - "Now, if ours were built in Germany."
3. If ours are building a plant in Germany - "Well, they don’t build it at home."
4. If ours are building a plant at home - "All the same, this is a bourgeois plant, profits will go to the bourgeois."
5 Foreign policy:
6. Russia does not interfere in the affairs of Syria / Libya / Venezuela - “Russia has leaked”.
7. Russia intervenes in the affairs of Syria / Libya / Venezuela - "This is aggression and imperialism."
Reaction to international provocations:
8. Russia responds softly - "Snot chew."
9. Russia responds firmly - "The militarists are damn!".
10. Russia ignores - “Snot chew, militarists are damn!”.
Interaction with "civil society".
11. The West is investing in grants - "Soft power, we could learn."
12. Russia is investing in grants - "Cut, waste taxpayer money."
Trade in resources.
13. The West threatens to oust Russia from the gas market in Europe - "Putin is a wimp, nothing can be done."
14. Russia is ousting from the European gas market the United States - "Country gas station."
Chronicles of decline.
15. Ford closes a plant in Russia - "The poor Russians have no money for cars."
16. Ford closes plants in Europe / USA - diligently pretend that nothing is happening.
17. Ford declares itself bankrupt (this is already possible in the near future) - “In the post-industrial economy, nobody needs this outdated primitive industry.”
Finance.
18. Russia sterilizes surplus dollar weight in securities to avoid the Dutch disease - “Russia pays the colonial tribute to the USA”.
19. Russia is getting rid of treasure - “We have not yet figured out why, but it's still bad.”
Domestic elections.
20. The representative of "United Russia" wins - "The elections are falsified!"
21. The representative of any other party wins - “Aha! The people became disillusioned with the authorities! ”
Opposition.
22. Do not plant bulk - “Why do not this traitor plant?!”.
23. Bulk will be imprisoned - "The regime arranges political repression!".
24. Navalny will flee abroad - “Where is the FSB looking ?!”.
The fight against corruption.
25. Corruptionists are not imprisoned - “ПЖиВ! They stole everything! ”
26. Corruptionists are planted - “This is a redistribution of property, not shared.”
27. Corruptionists are actively imprisoned, despite their political affiliation - “This is political repression, 1937!”
Taxes.
28. Create preferential conditions for business - “You need to introduce a progressive tax!”.
29. Introduce new taxes for business - "Putin strangles entrepreneurs!".
Well, a set of common phrases suitable for all occasions.
30. It would be better if they handed out to pensioners.
31. Putin has passed the point of no return.
32. The Kremlin is in a panic.
33. The mode received a black mark.
34. Hey, damned guards!
35. In Russia, fascism! SUGS!
36. You are outside the Moscow Ring Road!
37. The system is moving toward an inevitable collapse.
38. Klassenkampf uber alles! Klasov’s fight!
39. The Kuril Islands are given, Siberia was sold to the Chinese, they drank Baikal, they cut down the taiga.
40. Putin has cornered himself.
(A. Rogers)

In the top ten !!!

[tracer]

Right on target! Well, hipozhёra at least evade the author ..

[Serg72]

What's the point of minus someone? You think so, I - no, If there is a substantive, meaningful dispute - go ahead ... If there are simple labels and so on - yes, you live as you know, I - purple ... We all have, just, one of us , not giving a damn about them and you (their supporters, no matter what), are already working OUTSIDE Russia (my students fly to Asia with salaries of 25-28 and they SEEN your Putin-Medvedev ... (but to leave ... I think not yet) The world is much more complicated than "Putin" ... By the way, I don't care about Putin or anyone, ANYWHERE, at least on any websites it was discussed that he had 78 euros from our pence. ... Yes, there are many ...

[surok1]

Industry, science, infrastructure are on the rise. The world respected, the United States is afraid.

[CT-55_11-9009]

Quote: surok1

Industry, science, infrastructure are on the rise. The world respected, the United States is afraid.

I hope it was sarcasm? .. And then the industry - well, how to say, some industries are not falling yet, others are in decline, others are dead. Something is being restored, yes, for example, they started (finally !!!) to somehow develop microelectronics, but we will catch up with the flagships for a long time (to put it mildly) and not with market methods. Science - also how to say, our RAS is a big bugger, where academics and other respected people devour each other like spiders in a bank. And at the level of candidates of sciences and graduate students, there is practically no development - topics have been procrastinating for decades, there are very few fresh ones. Infrastructure - gyyy, travel around the outback not even Siberia (there is a stable situation with the availability of directions), but in Central Russia, for example: Vladimir region, Nizhny Novgorod region, Chuvashia, Mari-El. This is from what I've seen myself. Take the M7 and take a look at the infrastructure. Just don’t catch a heart attack, please. "The world respects, the US is afraid" - a topic for a separate conversation, depending on the view.

[surok1]

We are now not a punching bag, and my soul does not need more.

[CT-55_11-9009]

Quote: surok1

We are now not a punching bag, and my soul does not need more.

How long? At this rate, no. And it's not that sad, it’s a polar furry fox, well-fed, well-fed ...

[surok1]

Do not bzdi. Hmm, do not be afraid, my logic tells me while the body moves, or at least perlite, it is alive.

[CT-55_11-9009]

Quote: surok1

Do not bzdi. Hmm, do not be afraid, my logic tells me while the body moves, or at least perlite, it is alive.

Lying in a coma are also technically alive, only in fact - corpses.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Sahalinets

Manuals of the Kremlin troll. Everyone has everything according to plan, according to the points - (... hereinafter 17 points):

Will you be among the Nullandski trolls yourself? Here, on copper, she lamented that external pressure on GDP does not give a visible result, and therefore all hope for Viktorka Nulland and the US State Department remains only on internal "pressuredogs" who will put pressure on GDP in their mattress interests. That's what I see, the comments of these "fighters" (Lexus, Malyut, etc.) were not observed in the article about Nulland, so as not to highlight their involvement in the customer, but here today we "neutrally" roamed the topic, so that here " to defend the interests of the people by pressing "their own".

[NordUral]

I have already received half of this in response to my comments.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Ilya-spb

And who will give?

Perhaps the new president - if he is finally concerned about the country's economy.

Quote: Ilya-spb

And what, do you personally do nothing for Russia?

I do, and quite a lot.

Quote: Ilya-spb

Does the development of the country not depend on your contribution, too?

My dear man, do not talk to you about my contribution to the development of the country. I am responsible for my contribution, because in my lifetime I kept a number of enterprises, including city-forming ones, from ruin and bankruptcy, where they went by leaps and bounds. I took it and I did it. I am responsible for my words.
We’re just talking not about me, but about Putin, who is not completely responsible for his words, and who has not fulfilled a single significant promise to improve the economy in the Russian Federation. Over the 20 years of rule, yes. And who, having scrolled the country for 20 years, now does not even understand what he has done with the economy, medicine, education of the country, not to mention many other areas, such as forestry, etc. He really does not know what he is doing, and the longer he is at the helm, the more difficult it will be for his followers to scoop up what he has done. If at all possible.

[Sanichsan]

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

Perhaps the new president - if he is finally concerned about the country's economy.

who is your "new president"? Or are you, as usual, "for all good and against all bad"?

[flicker]

who is your "new president"?

They have a wide choice, they have up to 100 active fighters with Putin's regime here.
They will choose a centurion, or even a tenman, from their ranks and to the presidency.

Judging by the comments, each of them can easily solve any problem at once - how they start whining, so from their whining all the problems will die right away.

[Simargl]

Quote: flicker

They will choose a centurion, or even a tenman, from their ranks and to the presidency.

And he will do good right and left: he will take the loot from the oligarchs, distribute to pensioners .... and live after this attempt for 20 minutes ...

[flicker]

will take the loot from the oligarchs, will distribute to pensioners .... and will live after this attempt for 20 minutes ...

Here it will be so except for one thing - they will not distribute anything to any pensioners. They just whine and they have nothing to live on, they want to get hold of the oligarch dough - here they are and that ... for trindet on the site is not tossing bags.
---
You read them just some kind of kindergarten. Everything is so simple with them ...

[Simargl]

Quote: flicker

except for one thing - they will not give out anything to pensioners

Nonsense! He will be kind, furry and caring!
Throws balls on yelling.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: SanichSan

who is your "new president"?

He is not known to me.

Quote: SanichSan

Or are you, as usual, "for all good and against all bad"?

If you demand that the president fulfill the obligations he has taken on - this is "for all good against all bad" - then yes.

[Vadim237]

Any president of the country can take care of the economy - but they just won’t be able to take money out of thin air and they won’t appear with your Wishlist as well as mine, so 48% - 89 trillion rubles, this is just infrastructure costs, and then more: the pension needs to be increased, salaries of state employees should be increased, expenses are spent there, some want to spend 10% of GDP per year on medicine, the second want to spend 15% of GDP on science, 17% on defense, and so on - that to cover all this, Russia’s GDP should be increased by 300% —but due to which the foreign market is clogged with demand for everything as minimal as in the domestic market, printing money is not an option, as well as all accumulations letting the NWF and gold reserves go to zero. The current quarantine crisis has shown that even 13 trillion in a piggy bank can be spent within three months in case of distribution of money from a turntable and in order to hold out in similar conditions for a whole year in case of a new pandemic, you will need an amount 4 times more 50-60 trillion, as oil prices go up, the government will be forced to accumulate this amount in the NWF over the next 10 years to the detriment of all other expenses. Most likely, the 8 trillion that remained in the NWF will be spent this year and the beginning of the next national project that the pandemic and crisis did not cancel.

[Serg72]

Why are you a carbon copy ... Why "distribute", who says "distribute" ?? Is your thinking lacking? INCREASE PENSIONS, that's what "money from a helicopter" is (we don't have a concept of "households" like in the USA .... Well, read Keynes .... others .... I didn't calculate your numbers .... But , a simple estimate of an increase in the same PPI with an addition of 1080 r gave 1.8 percent (Europe would suffocate with envy for this) per sq. A vivid example - KSA for all jambs decreased from 15 in fnb from 738 to 400, began to borrow, BUT - THERE PEOPLE LIVE Hey, bookkeeper (you can find the numbers yourself, not small) ... Yes, all this is not interesting ... sour ...

[flicker]

But, a simple estimate of the increase in the same PPI when added by 1080 r gave 1.8 percent (Europe would have choked it with envy) per sq.

And what is PPI?

[Serg72]

As I understand it, they poked their heads into Google, and there - a blowout in the form of "screen resolution" Yes ... USE ...
PPI (Producer Price Index) aka CPI -In the USA this index is called PPI (Producer Price Index), it is calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). It publishes monthly information, which includes the measurement of prices for nearly 10 individual products of production (and their groups). This data covers almost all industries manufacturing goods in the United States. Sectors covered include agriculture, construction, manufacturing and mining, etc.
Then try to think for yourself, but ...

[flicker]

Thank you, now it’s clear - the price index of products.
I don’t use Google, I looked in Yandex, there was nothing similar there.

[Vadim237]

Only your money to increase your pension will be finite in one year, they will be raised in the next year, again lowered due to lack of budget revenues of the required amount. Money from the air will not be taken - Chop yourself this put. And I, unlike dreamers like you, live in the real world and have been doing business for 15 years, including investments.

[Cossack 471]

We have colonels of 10 lards at home in their bags Shake the colonels and there is enough money for everything

[Serg72]

Yes, here is a good example for you - who are you on this site - "captain", I am nobody, because I have been banned here four times (Well, local "generals-marshals" do not know the vocabulary in the army) Okay, let's go ... nevertheless, look how many comments from generals and how many from privates .... This is the mentality, the desire to become a "general" not in life, but at least on a cloud (altostratus, not even cumulonimbus, google, ignoramuses) and this is NORMAL ... But - in Europe you MUST become better for this (well, in order to suppress a competitor), but in our country they WILL MAKE you worse so that you do not defeat them ... And then the money, you say - just everything, you are not worthy, and I so I ducked you and got ...
This forum has nothing to do with, on the contrary, but. The PSYCHOLOGY of our brain is just that ... (just EWP

[Vadim237]

We need 89 trillion rubles - we have never had so many colonels with cash and never will be like officials to trust them. Finish nonsense.

[NordUral]

Once, Stalin did not throw folk money into a piggy bank, and even for a cordon.
Remove the budget rule, force the State Bank (supposedly popular) to maintain the ruble.
And it’s easier to return socialism and everything will be fine. Not by pike command, of course.

[Vadim237]

When the Bolsheviks came to power, royal debts in the amount of 10 billion, they decided not to give away the money of their citizens, Western countries immediately blacklisted our country and confiscated all the property of the former Tsarist Russia, including all assets located abroad of which at a cost there were much more than those 10 billion. For industrialization, Stalin again had to borrow hundreds of millions of dollars from the Kapstran countries, as his money was not enough to purchase equipment to attract the same Western specialists and everything else. In Russia, and so on, socialism is partly more than 7 trillion in the budget of 20 expenses for social benefits, pension benefits, etc. And there will never be full socialism since there is not enough money for it.

[NordUral]

Vadim! Russia paid the West a hundredfold all debts en masse on the battlefields of the 1st World War.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Vadim237

Any president of the country can take care of the economy - but only money for this can’t be taken out of thin air and they won’t appear in your Wishlist like mine

Then tell us why in Russia the money in circulation in relation to the manufactured goods is half that in Europe. We have about 40 kopecks per ruble of manufactured goods, they have 80 cents per euro of manufactured goods. That is, the European guys printed themselves twice as much as ours, but they are doing well. And we have half the money, but for some reason inflation is several times higher. What is it like?:))))
Maybe it’s not a matter of money, but the fact that the economic bloc is no good for us, because we are not able to manage the economy at the macro level? Didn’t come up with such a thought? :)

[Sanichsan]

Quote: Vadim237

Any president of the country can take care of the economy - yes, that's just money for it from the air will not work

why? Americans take it!
Hialmar Schacht from the air took a ton of money to restore and militarize Germany. Today, money is a product that is made from air.

[surok1]

Knows and good. Politics is the art of the possible. If, let’s say, there is nothing to show militarily and fiscally, then the fate of Gaddafi can await the obstinate president, and the country will be the fate of Libya. We are talking about a real country, and not about a sandbox like some of our neighbors?

[Simargl]

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

Perhaps the new president - if he is finally concerned about the country's economy.

Have you definitely learned history lessons? After all, I poke my nose - it will be insulting.
We had a "white" (almost) stripe. What "grew" out of it?

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

And who, having scrolled the country for 20 years, now does not even understand what he has done with the economy, medicine, education of the country, not to mention many other areas, such as forestry, etc.

Now correlate your "calm development", poor knowledge of history and the quoted piece of opus.

[Serg72]

"... cleverly! - Can I, can I?" (c) ("Squadron of hussars ...") "Poke your nose, please, where everything was" white "there? into an ethno dung mess for your very honor ...

[Simargl]

Quote: Serg72

Please note, for economic bills

Of course, everything is relative. Oil for 100, a minimum of sanctions, everyone relaxed.
Brezhnev stagnation - what was there?

 And the words are not the first time they sound

PS
Give your fertilizer.

[flicker]

And who will give?

Oh, there are a lot of them , about a hundred: Lexus, stas, snail ... especially strong "dedkastary" - this is just a virtuoso.
So there are many candidates.

[Overlock]

Quote: Ilya-spb

And what, do you personally do nothing for Russia?

love is a mutual process, agree. As after these words

can you answer your question?

[Peter Tverdokhlebov]

1881 The conjunction of Saturn and Neptune in Taurus = The assassination of Alexander 2
+ 36 years
1917 The conjunction of Saturn and Neptune in Leo + maximum solar activity = Revolution followed by civil war
+ 36 years
1953 The union of Saturn and Neptune in Libra = Death or assassination of Stalin
+ 36 years
1989 The conjunction of Saturn and Neptune in Capricorn + maximum solar activity = Revolution in the countries of the ATS, a parade of sovereignty and the subsequent collapse of the USSR
+ 36 years
2025 The conjunction of Saturn and Neptune in Aries + maximum solar activity =?
In 2024, the Western agent Putin became president again and in 2025 there was a powerful social explosion. I suppose Western agent Putin wants to arrange a civil war, followed by NATO intervention.

[Krasnodar]

2020 - bypass of the Chief Physician.

[Same lech]

And who will be the head doctor? ... it looks like a degree is rising in the room.

[Krasnodar]

Depends on the Moon in Jupiter

[4ekist]

And how does the moon affect the sexual life of cats, comrade. astronomer astrologer?

[Ingvar 72]

Quote: 4ekist

comrade astronomer astrologer?

He is a Jew.

[Krasnodar]

Quote: Ingvar 72

Quote: 4ekist

comrade astronomer astrologer?

He is a Jew.

This is your funniest joke on the site over the past 4 years

[avg]

This scientist astronomer-astrologer is more likely an astronomer-proctologist. And he broadcasts and information precisely from there he draws.

[Motorist]

The solar activity cycle is approximately 11 years. 36 not a multiple of 11, inconsistency ... And where does the planet? ..

[Peter Tverdokhlebov]

The conjunction of Saturn and Neptune is an astrological cycle, and the maximums of solar activity occur every 10 ... 14 years, the last maximum was in 2014, the next should be 2025.

[surok1]

Usually, with maximum solar activity, spots on the sun rise higher from the ecliptic plane and emissions have less effect on the Earth’s magnetic field.

[Peter Tverdokhlebov]

Russian biophysicist Alexander Chizhevsky proved that during the maximums of solar activity, the sun sends charged particles to the earth that affect the mental reactivity of people.

[Motorist]

People, cons for arithmetic? Recently, one member of the forum spoke out: you’ll write, they say, twice two = four - they will be jammed. I thought - an allegory, but no ...

[snake]

Quote: Motorist

Recently, one member of the forum spoke out: you’ll write, they say, twice two = four - they will be jammed. I thought - an allegory, but no ...

In the case of "one forum member" twice two = four was not an allegory, but an attempt to present one's opinion as the ultimate truth.
And you want to complain about two minuses, one of which, most likely, was given to you by a "very close" astrologer?

[Motorist]

Quote: serpent

And the hunt for you to complain about two minuses

Good evening! This is not a complaint, but bewilderment: "like" or "dislike" can be an opinion, good or bad news, and finally - just the interlocutor. But the fact that 36 is not a multiple of 11 - you just need to accept it as a fact (you can, if you wish, check it with a column, and then put up with it ...).
It’s a pity for the astrologer - they mercilessly mined ...

[ZAV69]

Quote: Pyotr Tverdokhlebov

1989 The conjunction of Saturn and Neptune in Capricorn + maximum solar activity = Revolution in the countries of the ATS, a parade of sovereignty and the subsequent collapse of the USSR

The collapse of the USSR in August 91, In 89, everything was fine.

[Peter Tverdokhlebov]

The collapse of the Soviet Union began in 1989. It is called a parade of sovereignty.

[ZAV69]

Again, it doesn’t fit together, the first declaration was 88 years old, in 89 there were only two declarations, the rest in 90. The referendum was at 91. I just served urgently, 89-91, nothing happened. Even from May to August, 91 nothing happened. So it’s a beautiful theory, but 2 years on a segment of 36 years is still rude.
And the fact that at 25 there will be a social explosion ..... People must lose absolutely everything. Most people. Then yes, it will explode. And such an outcome is not visible.

[Peter Tverdokhlebov]

In 1989, the collapse of the communist regime began in the countries of the Warsaw Pact, revolutions took place, the Berlin Wall fell. In the search engine, type "Years of the Snake Conjunction of Saturn and Neptune" several sites look there, everything is written in detail.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: ZAV69

89-91, nothing happened.

It happened, actually. Nationalists climbed out of all the cracks. Karabakh, Osh, Tribaltika ... But in Moscow, exactly in the 89th, the store shelves were empty.

[ZAV69]

Quote: Mordvin 3

And in Moscow, right in the 89th, the store shelves were empty

In 89, I was just in the FORBIDDEN. You will not believe it, there I first saw a condensed milk in free sale. 200 km from Moscow I did not see her, but I saw her there.
It seems to me that for some reason the shelves were empty, in the spring of 91 when everything was demolished in the commercial stores .... I was still buying liquor on the dump for children (there was vodka on coupons)

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: ZAV69

commercial liquor

Muck first. Only Amaretto could still be diluted with vodka. The rest is um ... how would I say that we would not be banned ... A brown substance, in two words.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Pyotr Tverdokhlebov

2025 The conjunction of Saturn and Neptune in Aries

And will we be there?

[Ingvar 72]

Quote: Ilya-spb

Many are very necessary.

Which for example? Can you justify the need for at least a pair? Exactly at the moment?

[Hypatius]

Which for example? belay Can you justify the need for at least a couple? Exactly at the moment?

Justified, one for now.
For example, public authority. There was the power of the people, and in contrast to the power of the public. Thus, logically, this is anti-people and occupation.
Public power is established during the formation of states or the occupation of countries. When there are no citizens, or people are deprived of citizenship.
Consolidation of the fact that Russian democracy (the demos class) bribes-forces the people to go on plebeysyt (to confirm entry into the plebos class).
PS De facto, depriving us of citizenship (or occupation of the state, which is essentially the same thing), we decided to consolidate de jure, through public authority.

[Hypatius]

I will supplement the definition: Public power is power isolated from society and does not coincide with the country's population, which is one of the features that distinguish the state from the social system. Usually opposed to public authority. The emergence of public authority is associated with the emergence of the first states.so as not to be confused with democracy, and especially democracy.

[avg]

Quote: Ilya-spb

Therefore - I’ll go to vote. And I will say yes to the amendments.
And that's why I support the amendments. I do not want a repeat of either 1917 or 1991.

I totally agree.
Corrections are needed. And no one is forcing us to vote for Putin. If Putin decides to continue his election, there will be separate elections, and here everyone is free to vote as he wants.

[snake]

Quote: Ilya-spb

Opponents of the vote for amendments criticize only one amendment - about the nullification of deadlines. About the others - they say almost nothing.

Here is another interesting correction:

The President of the Russian Federation has the right to appoint 7 senators for life. In part 2 of Article 95 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the President will be given the right to appoint 30 senators of the Federation Council, of which no more than 7 may be appointed for life.

Why do we need lifelong senators? Don’t drag them by the ears.

Quote: Ilya-spb

Opponents of the amendments are not confident in the people.

On what basis did you make such a conclusion, "scientist"?

Quote: Ilya-spb

Therefore - I’ll go to vote. And I will say yes to the amendments.

I will say "yes" to amendments, and "sometimes" to drugs. I wonder what the amendments will tell you in response ...

Quote: Ilya-spb

By the way, under Putin there is no such inflation as in the 90s. Let me remind you this too.

Well, of course ... Where without the 90s ... It is interesting: the next president after Putin (or already the king) will remember the 90s, or will the GDP be extreme ..?

[your1970]

Quote: serpent

Well, of course ... Where without the 90s ... It is interesting: the next president after Putin (or already the king) will remember the 90s, or will the GDP be extreme ..?

-sul in the USSR-where each successive Secretary General spoke about the previous nasty things (Khrushchev about Stalin, Brezhnev about Khrushchev, Gorbachev about Stalin and Brezhnev) - next will say nasty things about Putin ...

The only question is whether the country will live better from this ....

[Malyuta]

Quote: Ilya-spb

And that's why I support the amendments. I do not want a repeat of either 1917 or 1991.
Russia needs a quiet development.

I am very sorry, but there wasn’t, there will not be any development under the mutin, but there will be a robbery of the country and the destruction of the population, there will be total genocide!

[surok1]

Choked on sausage!

[Vadim237]

Russia has existed as a state since 1547 for all the time that has elapsed to the present day and until 1547 there were many crises, coups, invasions and wars, including the total destruction of Russia, but it withstood all this, withstood and continued to live on. And when someone tries to frighten with such opuses "But under mutiny there was no development, and there will not be any development, but there will be a robbery of the country and the destruction of the population, there will be total genocide!" You can safely treat these writers like crazy.

[ZAV69]

Quote: Malyuta

I really apologize, but there wasn’t, there will not be any development with mutin

I traveled around the district 20 years ago — there wasn’t a single normal road; if you go, the wheels will come off, the farmer is finished off with the remnants of collective farm equipment. Now you are driving along a repaired road, 2 new plants have been built nearby, several large agricultural firms overgrown fields. So there is clearly development. Nen, you need to fill in about prone polymers here

[Bshkaus]

I do not want a repeat of either 1917 or 1991.

The irremovability of power is the main premise for revolutions. The reason is not even whether a good ruler or not, the fact is that for 20 years one person has been in power and has been simply unable to possess equally developed qualities for any situation.
You have a set of wrenches in the glove compartment of at least 10 pieces and there is no need to tell me about the miracle of the "adjustable wrench" - one for all occasions. practice shows that with this monkey wrench it turns out to be impossible to unscrew at least something.
I’m sure that you don’t drive in the same car for 20 years and don’t wear the same underpants all these years. Right?
Lukashenko has actually played out, the people just got tired of it, they will simply sweep him away if not for good, then for bad. I recommend watching the brewing ...

[surok1]

They want to steer everything. More presidents good and different? The country as a drunkard will stagger at a rate, ministers to adapt each time? The booth. Smart people are more likely to organize a deep state.

[dauria]

The booth. Smart people are more likely to organize a deep state.

Already organized. Just before the first appearance on the stage of Putin in 99 (then still as acting director) We sat down at the table, rubbed it, realized that they were losing the country and what they had acquired by "backbreaking work." They threw out the dissenting Berezovsky (Gusinsky, Khodorkovsky and others) and worked out a rule - we don’t gnaw our own people (even if we really want to), strangers - to shreds. That is the whole reason for the stability, prosperity and long sitting of a screen named Putin VV, which they chose, cherished and promoted. Actually, it's okay - this is how all decent bourgeois states live. And here is how the squabble at the round table begins at the top - then right there below the Maidans, "black people too" and other "levoryutsiya".

[surok1]

This is bad only in terms of stagnation, when senile people remain in charge. Or comes "golden youth", degenerates. This is how empires fall.

[Vadim237]

Lukashenko is not Putin, but the food shortage was and remains the main prerequisite for the revolution in Russia. It began in 1917 and ended in it in the late 80s and early 90s.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Bshkaus

The irremovability of power is the main premise for revolutions.

Hmm, a somewhat strange and controversial conclusion Here, our borders have a certain territorial entity, called Ukroina, so there the regular turnover of power occurs with "enviable" constancy, but even they still will not blossom.

[Bshkaus]

25 again? But what does Ukraine give you so much sleep?
Hmm, a somewhat strange and controversial conclusion
Why is it strange?
was Yushchenko, namaydanil, but Ukraine did not raise. They removed the poor fellow after the first term.
was Yanukovych, stealing hats, setting his everywhere, people got tired - a suitcase, a station, Rostov ...
Poroshenko was, he decided to build a power by fire and sword, removed after the first term.
Zelensky came - as long as "trolls Putin a little more", people like it, then it will be clear what to do with the "second series".
The bottom line is that the people immediately remove the person, if he does not pull the responsibilities assigned to him.
Is it bad? And we have?
There was Putin, a cat was born, and an official stole.
There was Putin, a cat died, and we have Potemkin villages.
There was Putin back, and in the country there were no longer any seals left who would not have lived under Putin, but in a country that is not a "breakthrough", so dams or dams.
20 years in one place, and in many respects a step back, and we have everything Putin!
Yes, I got it already, I'm tired, I need a breath of fresh air, a new man, not in the sense of a receiver from the same gang, but new looks.
We were already so happy that the patriarch called the day of the beginning of the war "a marching day".
What kind of bill Putin will propose, they say "thank you" in all seriousness. Another year or two, they will be like a frostbitten Turkmenbashi, bent almost to the waist, to give their hand, and it is better to do it on all fours - in a position of submission.
But what kind of zashkvar is already in the minds?

[Nyrobsky]

Changing the figure does not mean changing the system, but it is built in such a way, whether vertically or horizontally, that it will ensure its survival even in the absence of Putin. In addition, one must also understand that the next 5-10 years will be stupidly spent on the inter-clan struggle of the Kremlin beau monde, aimed at redistributing business, state assets, sales markets and for taking control of financial flows. Miller and Sechin will not forcibly shove babos into your pockets. No one will rush to return the privatized assets to the people and pull them out of offshore companies under the jurisdiction of Russia, since the authorities will have no time for the people to speak at all. it will be busy with redistribution. I don’t want to be trivial, but it is these processes that are observed in Ukraine every time the government changes. Can't wait to experience the meaning of the saying - "Pans fight, but the forelocks of slaves crackle"? Any forceful scenario aimed at a change of power will lead to a weakening of state control and to a war on the territory of Russia. This was the case with Chechnya after the shooting of Parliament in 1993, and this is how it is today in Ukraine, after the forcible seizure of power, but is it necessary? Only this time, Russia's sworn friends will not give such an opportunity for Russia to survive, because they took into account the mistakes of their failure in the implementation of the plan to zero Russia in the 90s. What do you, "underrevolutionaries" have in your head? Stomp to the polls and take 20 acquaintances with you and vote "against" if you want a change of power without a mess, and then you will look for the fifth corner when other "underrevolutionaries" come to hang you.

[Malyuta]

Quote: Nyrobsky

ensure its survival even in the absence of Putin. In addition, we must also understand that the next 5-10 years will be stupidly spent on the inter-clan struggle of the Kremlin elite,

Not true, yours! A maximum of 3-6 months, 10-20 public TV executions, the rest themselves will bring everything.

[your1970]

Quote: Malyuta

Quote: Nyrobsky

ensure its survival even in the absence of Putin. In addition to this, it is also necessary to understand that subsequent 5-10 years stupidly will be spent on the clan struggle of the Kremlin beau monde,

Not true, yours! Maximum 3-6 months, 10-20 public TV executions, the rest themselves will bring everything.

- in China they shoot for corruption (including publicly at stadiums) - more than 20 (!!!!!!!) years. AND?

[Lannan Shi]

Quote: Ilya-spb

And that's why I support the amendments. I do not want a repeat of either 1917 or 1991.
Russia needs a quiet development.

Can I ask a question? Putin, in general, is already an old man. For example, they kick out of the army in 65, due to incapacity. Guarantor 68 already. Upon reaching the next term it will be over 70 ... By the end at 80. Excuse me generously, but are you sure that a decrepit ruin will be able to rule the country? This is the first.
And the second ... Putin is still mortal. When he is. Will you run for the rope and soap? For from your word, without it, the country will immediately die. For it will be either 1917, or 1991, or at all, the horsemen of the apocalypse will come. Or embalm, tape to the throne with tape, and let him rule from the astral?
By the way. If the country has such a tough Putin addiction, like heroin, then you need to chop it as soon as possible. The sooner such dependencies are eliminated, the less harm they manage to inflict on the body. And the more chances to survive, and not die from breaking. Scientific fact.

[surok1]

Young scout must be found. :-)

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: surok1

Young scout must be found

5 years as a club director in a friendly country? Scout? Also say "illegal". With such a face, only the head clubs will take it. Palevo.
What scout, this time "must be found", the bowels? So the current one only picks at them, as in his own pocket.

[Vadim237]

GRUSHNIKIs are quite well-groomed - most likely, one of them at 45 years old will become the new president.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Lannan Shi

Excuse me generously, but are you sure that a decrepit ruin will be able to rule the country? This is the first.

Trump is 74 years old. For the right to govern the states with him, Biden is butting whom is 77 years old.

Quote: Lannan Shi

And the second ... Putin is still mortal. When he is. Will you run for the rope and soap?

It's strange how your logic works, just a little after the rope and soap run. And where did the prime minister go? Chi wines at once died too?

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Ilya-spb

Russia needs a quiet development.

It's right. Russia needs systematic development, and not quiet degradation and extinction.

[Runoway]

I’m going to vote, I won’t go, what difference does it make when a reissued amended constitution is already on sale ????
And of course it will be put forward, Tereshkova taught the text not in vain

[whiteidol]

Sooner or later, the GDP will go away, but the amendments will remain. What's done is done.

[standan]

Article 71, paragraph T http://duma.gov.ru/news/48045/

[Simargl]

Quote: Ilya-spb

1) the amendments to the Constitution themselves. Many are very necessary.
I like the ban on dual citizenship for officials and the ban on cash accounts abroad.
I support the priority of Russian law over international, even through a constitutional court.

Almost everyone here supports it. And if the amendments were introduced by separate paragraphs, there would be fewer questions, although I, for example, have: international law is not a decision of some kind of court that can twist this right as it can, but some agreements with which we agreed not only to us, but also to the others (here we need to talk about equilibrium and a balanced policy of agreements), if you act in isolation from international law, you can reach out to anything.

Quote: Ilya-spb

- amendments are being made to nullify Putin’s presidential terms.

If this were the only nonsense - I would vote "yes", but there are many other not very correct things.

Quote: Ilya-spb

I have weighed everything. Opponents of the vote for amendments criticize only one amendment - about zeroing the deadlines. About the others - they say almost nothing.

Your scales have broken: opponents of opponents only "advertise" this. The destructive amendments are advertised with might and main on the Central Television and are presented as "mana from heaven".

Quote: Ilya-spb

Our people remember the frenzy of Perestroika-Catastrophe, and the "dashing nineties"

No, he doesn’t remember!

Quote: Ilya-spb

Russia needs a quiet development.

There is no calm development! You know the story very poorly! Accordingly, you do not understand her lessons well.

[Rzzz]

Quote: Ilya-spb

Our people remember the frenzy of Perestroika-Catastrophe, and the "dashing nineties",

We just need to remember that perestroika was the result of twenty years (oops!) STANDBY, and it happened not because the people wanted jeans and chewing gum, but because there was nothing to eat. In general, the fact that there was nothing to eat is nothing new for our country, and in other circumstances it would have been relatively calm, but not this time. At that time, the government demonstrated to the people that it did not understand anything at all about what was happening outside the Moscow Ring Road. It seems that everything was fine with us officially. That is, the authorities have lost their authority "to zero" (oops!)
Plus, a military conflict with goals incomprehensible to the majority of the people and huge budget expenditures (oops!) And disgraced the USSR and a half of the world.
Plus, an oil-oriented budget, and a game of reduction by our sworn partners (also oops).
The collapse of the industry. Then it had just begun, expressed in the technical backwardness of many enterprises and the loss-making of production. Now it’s good, instead of unprofitable factories, modern shopping centers and residential housing. But there’s nothing to fill the treasury with anyway. Oil workers demand tax breaks and subsidies. Non-oil industry in a hard failure. But you can’t collect a lot of taxes from cafes and barbershops.
Well, many more interesting analogies can be found. In general, I believe that Gorbi had few choices. Returning to socialism is fantastic. Kapi-socialism, as in China - there was no brain and authority. Maidan and the Civil War. A military or general coup d'etat (almost happened in 1991). Well, then, perestroika, which in a few years became completely uncontrollable. But I believe that all these events passed very softly with us, it could have been much worse.

So by voting "for" - you choose an option that can be called "perestroika-2".

[IS-80_RVGK2]

Quote: Ilya-spb

I do not want a repeat of either 1917 or 1991.

And you will get both of them. You are not so your children. Denying the objective laws of the reality surrounding you, you will not get rid of their impact.

[Giharka]

He said everything correctly. And our whole family will go to the vote! And let's say "YES" !!!!

[The leader of the Redskins]

I am ashamed. It’s just a shame that in a country where they try to denigrate other leaders so much, where they poke at some small, insignificant posts on all sorts of facebook and instagrams, such a farce may even exist!
When insolently, through the knee, they do whatever they like!

[surok1]

Before bedtime and lunch, do not read anything at all. And do not look for sun spots.

[Interlocutor]

And it won’t be observed .. as long as he will rule .. he doesn’t need competitors .. he’s afraid of debate ..

Turn on the TV and watch its video conferences with the leadership of the country. Why do you need debate. What would some kind of chicken allow itself to broadcast in the face with impunity a far-fetched lie or throw dirt. He does it right. Debate, this is in the USA. There is order and democracy. If Yeltsin was nauseous, then there is debate, that is not a debate ... Look at the finished business ...
Mistakes ... Yes, the stump of errors will be clear. Where are they taught to lead such a country? Who will say. Who else in the world knows how to lead such a country? That's right, nobody. Everyone who will lead further will learn for himself. And next will be a team of either like-minded people, or mediocrity, or even worse traitors of all stripes. Well, the people will, as always, discuss, blame, praise. Just like now.

[Greenwood]

Quote: Interlocutor

Why do you need debate. What would some kind of chicken allow itself to broadcast in the face with impunity a far-fetched lie or throw dirt.

Debate is one of the democratic principles. At the same time, they can show how the main person of the country has information and knows how to take a blow. For some reason, the presidents in the US do not shy away from this, in Europe they do not shy away, but why are we worse? Or is it not a president in our country, but a tsar-father-autocrat, before whom we must bow and stand on our knees ?! In the yard of 2020, if anything, it's time to get rid of the servile mentality and squatting in front of the "king".

Quote: Interlocutor

Look at things done

I don’t see things done. I see a mess in the country, I see corruption, I see a commodity economy, I see inefficient spending of left and right public funds, I also see a drop in living standards and population. Where are you?

Quote: Interlocutor

Where is such a country taught to lead? Who will say. Who else in the world knows how to lead such a country?

How is ruling Russia fundamentally different from ruling the United States, China, India, or any Asian or European country? Even carries you ...

Quote: Interlocutor

Everyone who will lead further will learn for himself.

So let this "everyone" lead. In the meantime, I see the same Putin clinging to power with all his might and contradicting his own loud statements 10-15 years ago.

[Malyuta]

Quote: Greenwood

In the meantime, I see one and the same Putin, who clings to power with all his might and contradicts his own loud statements of 10-15 years ago.

This citizen will become the blackest spot in the history of Russia, the day after all his deeds are opened.

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: Greenwood

Debate is one of the democratic principles. At the same time, they can show how the main person of the country owns information and knows how to hold the blow.

I put you +. But I don’t believe in debate either. Implant into the ears of the radio headphones (or sound transmission over the bones), plus a few acting lessons, business ...
And this person is used to answering questions either with questions or about nothing. Longing green ...

[Voyager]

Quote: Greenwood

For some reason, in the United States, presidents do not shy away from this, in Europe they do not shy, but why are we worse?

We are better, therefore debate is not needed. Gone are the days when we were sitting in front of the TV and exclaimed in joy "from the good fellow" while one or another politician gagged another. And in the west, just people are led, how much more beautiful a fairy tale you tell them, so much they will believe.

In addition, I recall that the current head of the country is not obliged to participate in this debate, and it is understandable why.

[surok1]

I’ll tear the American flag. :-) Paloskame.

[oligofren32]

Quote: Svarog

I'm afraid of debate ..

But the meaning of this debate? 20 years of his leadership speak for themselves better than any debate. And let the bloggers engage in unemployed debates, they are afraid of real work then

[snake]

Quote: oligofren32

But the meaning of this debate? 20 years of his leadership speak for themselves better than any debate. And let the bloggers engage in unemployed debates, they are afraid of real work then

And could you leave this kind of comment on VO more often? It seems to me that nobody will even argue with you. Everything will be piercingly clear anyway ... Who and what ...

[tracer]

He somehow did not ask you and your attitude. How do you not understand that your senile grumbling has nothing to do with reality. People will vote as they want, and you will not like it inadequate in time but it’s your problem. You are on the site, your only outlet is pouring your nonsense on people’s heads, and this is extremely important for you. Because no one else hears you anywhere else.

[mark2]

Funny.
And what do you think Putin must do to make competitors appear?
And why, in order for his competitors to appear, should Putin do something? Are they small children or what? And your words are babble.
Competitors are destroyed by both legal and illegal methods, according to the traditions of the human world and the logic of any government. And the competitor's task is to carry out similar actions against the opponent. Only in the struggle does a worthy one appear.
And why do we need such a candidate, whom the previous government cared and lileel? This is the same "mama's son" turns out. And the old government will "milk" him like a cow.
A competitor must appear in the competition. Otherwise, this is some kind of liberal swamp. The same parties that agreed among themselves, parties like the Tories and Whigs, like Republicans and Democrats, put forward similar candidates like two drops of water. The development of society does not change at all. Stagnation.

[2 Level Advisor]

Example. In the pride of lions, the main lion kills all the lion cubs who give the voice. Do you think that a worthy to become the main thing should survive and win if he is stronger .. Well, there is logic in the words .. But, in practice, what is the chance to survive even if you are super-capable, remaining in the pride and speaking against? all the coolness of an old lion that he kills lion cubs ..
The options are:
1. Whitie from the pride to grow. Abroad in the sense of? And who will vote for him after that?
2. Pretend to be loyal until you grow up. That is, completely copy everything the leader does, integrate into his system and "swear" to him. And will it be a good competitor? And is it a competitor in general?
Apparently, until the leader "grunts", everything will be so .. a natural change of power, so to speak ..

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Svarog

And it will not be observed .. as long as he will rule .. he does not need competitors ...

So it is with any power so. One who believes in the possibility of the opposite is simply an idealist.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: Svarog

competitors are not needed .. the debate is afraid ..

name at least one REAL

[Aleksey Aleksandrovich]

Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir

name at least one REAL

So this is anyone, if only not Putin. There is no sense in cultivating a real candidate, so it turns out that the candidate's name is "HTO PLEASE".

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: Alexey Alexandrovich

So this, yes anyone, if only not for Putin

This is not an answer

[Aleksey Aleksandrovich]

You do not ask me, but to those who repeat the mantra about the change of power. In principle, I am also not opposed to the change of power, but the alternative should be reinforced concrete. And I do not want to change the GDP to anyone.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: Alexey Alexandrovich

And I do not want to change the GDP to anyone.

Quote: Alexey Alexandrovich

So this, yes anyone, if only not for Putin.

eeeee, I alone see a contradiction in the statements?

[Aleksey Aleksandrovich]

Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir

eeeee, I alone see a contradiction in the statements?

That was sarcasm

[surok1]

Do you think the skeleton of EBN will not be dragged, or worse? A financial Jesuit, like Hodor, with a stone in his bosom and unlimited credit from the west.

[Vadim237]

With the arrival of another person to the presidency - from the United Russia party and no other party will change much in the country whom Putin will appoint instead of him and will vote.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Vadim237

whom Putin will appoint instead of him and vote.

People like you have already voted for NeDimona. How is it?

[Vadim237]

And what, he voted - he served a term and went away again chose Putin. At least it didn't get any worse.

[2 Level Advisor]

The main logical contradiction of many is that one should look not at "so that it does not get worse", but at "so that it becomes better."

[Vadim237]

What would be better for us - this is needed so that the world economy gets better in terms of growth, but this has not yet been observed, why will there be growth in Russia when there is no demand - and you’ll at least put a situation with the government that will not change the situation in this direction you need to develop all of yours a lot of time and a lot of money, and not the fact that everything will turn out as planned as an example, the 2020 strategy that was set in 2008 - in 2008, its implementation was covered with a copper basin when the global financial crisis hit all sectors, only greeted 2014 economic crisis sanctions blocking trade in export imports cutting off access to foreign investment that continues to this day is yet another crisis associated with the global coronovirus epidemic, a drop in demand for all goods and services around the world will get out of it only after three years and the NWF will have to replenish and not up to 13 trillion and up to 50 - 60 as the current situation has shown that the accumulated money is enough only for three months.

[Aleksey Aleksandrovich]

Quote: Svarog

And it won’t be observed .. as long as he will rule .. he doesn’t need competitors .. he’s afraid of debate ..

Who is to blame that people who positioned themselves as competitors to the incumbent president so ineptly "merged" going out into circulation. Not only people, but entire political parties have lost their electorate and any serious influence on political processes. I'm not even talking about the non-systemic opposition, whose leaders resemble clowns and not politicians. Look at the parliamentary "opposition", or rather at their leaders, the so-called. "opposition".
Permanent, hardened, clutching their sitting chairs with arms and legs, vigorously depicting activities for the benefit of the people, and in fact supporting the government on almost all key issues.
Remember the Communist Party of the late 90s and early 2000s. A strong, influential party with great popular support. Look what Zyuganov made of it. Absolutely helpless bunch of people do not influence anything and do not pretend, having lost all their authority. About the LDPR and SR, I generally keep quiet.
So Putin is not to blame for the fact that Putin has no competitors. And who is to blame guess yourself.

[Voyager]

Quote: Svarog

I'm afraid of debate ..

Do you seriously think he is afraid of debate?

[Svarog]

Quote: Voyager

Quote: Svarog

I'm afraid of debate ..

Do you seriously think he is afraid of debate?

Yes, I think so seriously. He has a very weak spot, namely a bunch of unfulfilled promises that were made in public, the negative growth of demography, the economy, and the fact that he has been in power for 20 years and cannot blame anyone. To this we can add nepotism, corruption, etc. .. In general, if he agreed to the debate, he would have to dodge and spin, like in a frying pan ..

[Tatyana Sementsova]

And with whom to debate, with Ksenia Anatolyevna? Fall to her level? Can still sit in a coffin with her?

[Mooh]

Also voted for, but tired. Let it be better on a smaller scale, you see, and such large-scale errors will not make.

[Lexus]

Better be a smaller scale

A smaller scale just surrounds him. What nowhere else. Nature has long come up with an effective insecticide from such invasions.

[flicker]

Also voted for, but tired.

"Tired" - by the way, a strong argument, so as not to forget I'll write it down in my notebook.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: MooH

Better be a smaller scale,

God forbid, such a trick

[Sahalinets]

Yes you? And have you heard much about Putin before his appointment as prime minister in August 99? Also tell us that if Putin chokes on a sandwich tomorrow, Russia will die ...

[Same lech]

if Putin chokes on a sandwich tomorrow

Tipun to your tongue ... you imagine who in his place will begin to tear ... Wang Volodin ... and this comrade will show everyone Kuzkin’s mother ... later you will regret that Putin is not around.

[ltc35]

Oh well what are you! Volodin became famous for licking and kissing his master's boots. They certainly will not be elected and nominated.

[Sahalinets]

Putin holds Volodin in case toilet paper runs out. Here his clever tongue will do something great ...

[Sergej1972]

Just Volodin won the really competitive elections in his constituency in the late 90s and early zero years.

[surok1]

This is just envy. Judge for yourself. Volodin believes Putin, Putin believes Volodin. And there is no pederastic overtones in this. Maybe he personally borrowed from you and did not give?

[ltc35]

I didn’t say a word about his inclinations and sexual preferences. I condemn his unveiled flattery. Russia needs a leader, not a flatterer!

[NordUral]

And for several years now I have been sorry that Stalin is not.

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: NordUral

And for several years now I have been sorry that Stalin is not.

I regret it since the end of the 70s.

[NordUral]

In principle, it was in the 70s that rot in the country flourished as petrodollars appeared in the country.

[Old partisan]

At one time, what nonsense went
If God forbid, Leonid Ilyich dies, then immediately a war with the Chinese and America. For the past, the fins fused and everything was calm.

[makasan34]

Quote: Sahalinets

Also tell us that if Putin chokes on a sandwich tomorrow, Russia will die ...

not from the sun, it’s so easy not to get rid of it; he lived like he was and will live

[Ragnar Lodbrok]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

But I voted for him ... there were no more presidential contenders of this magnitude.

Who is Leeson.

[DED_peer_DED]

Singing together

Where, where do they sing?

[NordUral]

But I voted for him ... there were no more presidential contenders of this magnitude.

Is that so, Alex?

[your1970]

Quote: NordUral

But I voted for him ... there were no more presidential contenders of this magnitude.

Is that so, Alex?

WHO???? Zhirinovsky? Billionaire Grudinin (type from the Communist Party)? Ksyu? Mironov?
Lucky Lee? Irina Gagite? Baburin? Lisitsyna? Pillar?

WHO??

[NordUral]

Grudinin is a billionaire only in the inflamed heads of lovers of this power.

[your1970]

Quote: NordUral

Grudinin billionaire only in sore heads lovers of this power.

list of Assets CJSC "Kolkhoz ......" made up for 2018 - 5,6 billion rubles according to reporting.
Grudinin, his wife and companies affiliated with them in 2018 belonged to 96% of shares
Beauty Company (Unlike JSC) is that the owner of the shares can sell his shares to anyone at any time - even to Trump .... or to the Pope ... or to me (if I had 5 lards at hand) .... the law encourages such operations ... There would be grandmas and a desire to buy ...

In an open joint stock company, it is almost impossible to sell to the side and without the consent of shareholders.
That is why all land landowners of the 90s carried out a hap of land in one direction - SPK - JSC - ZAO ....... and the peasants were left with a hole from a donut ....

That is why in the village they practically didn’t vote for Grudinin, people can’t be fooled by living local curcule - a farmer nearby ...

Or, according to you, the ownership of shares in the property of CJSC "Kolkhoz ..." in the amount of about 5 billion is not billionaire?

Z.Y. And yes - after the divorce, his wife squeezed out 42% of his shares. So, he is almost starving now by Moscow standards - just a couple of lard ...

ZYZ.ZY-If he, speaking as a candidate from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, transferred the shares of the party, I would still have thought, you never know, suddenly honest and decent ...
But no - the Communist Party separately - shares separately ......

[Malyuta]

Quote: your1970

The assets of CJSC "Kolkhoz ......" amounted to 2018 billion rubles in 5,6 according to the reporting.

First read the charter of this society.
Second, you consider the assets of the state farm, precisely at the value that Putin wants to squeeze out of the state farm.
Third, did it ever occur to you that Grudinin could quite easily sell assets for the indicated 5,6 lard and live in peace in any country in the world?
Hence the main question for you, why did he (Grudinin) not do this?
Or do you "crown" friend Wrotenberg overshadows common sense?

[your1970]

Quote: Malyuta

First read the charter of this society.

- I have read in due time a lot of such statutes of such ZAO. They are standard and in the statute of ZAO "Kolkhoz ..." there is nothing masterpiece

Quote: Malyuta

Second, you consider the assets of the state farm, precisely at the value that Putin wants to squeeze out of the state farm.

if you sell them REAL cost Moscow land - there at least threefold assets will be more expensive

Quote: Malyuta

Third, did it ever occur to you that Grudinin could completely safely sell assets for the specified 5,6 lard and live in any country in the world? Hence the main question for you, why did he (Grudinin) not do this?

-Because 5bn is just 83 млн dollars at the then exchange rate. And abroad, it will be necessary to pay taxes, buy real estate and so on the little things .... He decided to sit here and sat out - the wife shared ....

Quote: Malyuta

Or do you "crown" friend Wrotenberg overshadows common sense?

-on the MY common sense - if you go to the presidency from the communists - somehow indecently be a billionaire ... Yes PRESENT Communists next to him would disdain on the field ....

He would have gone to the candidates from the joint venture / Yabloko / LDPR - I would not have questions for him (especially in connection with his program - the exact opposite of the Communist Party program) .... liberal as a liberal, nothing new ...
I would give my shares of the Communist Party-it would also be clear and logical ....

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: your1970

in my common sense - if you go to the presidency from the Communists - it is somehow indecent to be a billionaire ...

And, if you go to the presidency from the "family", then it is decent to be - a beggar?
Yeah ...

[your1970]

Quote: DED_peer_DED

Quote: your1970

in my common sense - if you go to the presidency from the Communists - it is somehow indecent to be a billionaire ...

And, if you go to the presidency from the "family", then it is decent to be - a beggar?
Yeah ...

-and Grudinin came from the "family" or still from COMMUNISTS?

[your1970]

Judging by 5 cons on my post

Quote: your1970

-My common sense is that if you go to the presidency from the Communists, then it’s indecent to be a billionaire ... Yes, the REAL Communists would have disdained him next to the field ....

- something happened with the word "communist" - apparently now you can be billionaire and communist simultaneously

[Vadim237]

In the wretches of communism, insanity simply grows stronger.

[surok1]

Do not judge rashly. You too could not have created a classic collective farm in modern conditions. And the laws are such that the wife can overcome half the common fund. And women are a swirling substance.
But the late communist approach to business is more scary for me. I used to be in EP. Somehow we put the chairman of the cell of the former party. Our style meeting began to resemble the old USSR, the chairman began to behave like a robot.

[NordUral]

Then so many words, Sergei! You just delve into the topic and about his "billions" even you will understand everything. Its billions are their village, its infrastructure and their company.

[your1970]

Quote: NordUral

Its billions are their village, its infrastructure and their company.

Lord, how far you are from the village !!!
We have such mini-stern 12 pieces in the area. CJSC truth is no longer left; they have long been re-registering the entire land of CJSC as their property. Someone who is more successful, someone less, but they all look like a carbon copy .... During the period of the joint-stock company, they beat off a bunch of shares, then during the period of the joint stock company they bought or squeezed out the remaining land shares ...
And then the company, 49 people under the law, no more .. 48 people have one share, one 98% of the shares

And about the village, kindergarten and the like, everything is simply indecent. Everything that is not municipal or private property belonged to him (in the volume of his block of shares), all property and funds of the company. And to sell all this - he can easily and naturally, including a kindergarten. Similarly, he can sell the non-privatized balance sheet housing stock of a closed joint-stock company. There, the lawyers of the company are guaranteed to register, that the employee is obliged to vacate housing in certain cases ...
So all property and funds of a closed joint-stock company are precisely his personal billions were (before the divorce).

This is a general rule of law.

[NordUral]

You sell noodles elsewhere, Sergey.

[your1970]

Quote: NordUral

You sell noodles elsewhere, Sergey.

Is there a weak point in the discussion of the facts?
I’m just living in a small village and I’ve been observing such latifundists for 30 years soon ....

Once again, all balance sheet without any restrictions, he can sell the property of the company at any time to any person. This is one of the main charms of the company, and it is prescribed by law ..
You can write anything about me that you don’t agree with me - but he won’t stop being the owners of 42% of the shares of the company at the moment (the rest went to his wife after the divorce).
https://www.list-org.com/company/9532 - это ЗАО
https://www.list-org.com/man/6314 - а это он - как учредитель ряда фирм around Company

If you want to choose an oligarch from the Communists - your right ....

Z.Y. If, God forbid, someday he turns out to be the main candidate - I will vote for anyone, for Ksyushad, Baburin, or Zyuganov, and even for Platoshkin - at least it’s clear what to expect from them ......

Z.Z.Z. I will repeat

Quote: your1970

Z. Z. Z.-If he were speaking candidate from the Communist Party - would transfer the shares of the party I would still think - you never know, suddenly honest and decent ......
But no - the Communist Party separately - shares separately ......

[NordUral]

Once again - he can sell all the balance sheet property of a CJSC without any restrictions at any time to any person. This is one of the main charms of the company, and it is prescribed by law ..

But Grudinin, by no means, does not want you, Sergey to listen and sell everything. But the raiders, perhaps from Putin, or maybe not, no one held a candle above them, everyone tries to tear it apart.
Maybe, but the trouble is he doesn’t want to. And it destroys all your constructions.

[your1970]

Quote: NordUral

But Grudinin, by no means, does not want you, Sergey to listen and sell everything ....Maybe, but the trouble is he doesn’t want to. And it destroys all your constructions.

-what are the constructions? what is he a billionaire?
That is if not selling- then automatically NOT a billionaire?
Won Th .....
Then in Russia there are no billionaires at all - they OWN billions of property, but DO NOT SELL it...
Potanin - NOT billionaire - Norilsk Nickel does not sell
Alikperov - NOT billionaire - Lukoil does not sell
Usmanov - NOT Billionaire - Megaphone does not sell
Mordashov- NOT Billionaire Severstal does not sell

Grudinin - from the same row, small (ruble) - but a billionaire ....
And absolutely to the point - whether he wants or does not want to sell, he is already a billionaire upon the fact of owning (actually the sole in 2018) funds

Do you understand what you are writing ???? mat....
If suddenly я tomorrow I will become the sole owner of Gazprom - but I will not sell its assets - I, too I will not billionaire, in your opinion? !!!

[NordUral]

I understand perfectly, Sergey. If I didn’t understand, I would only live on a pension of 12 thousand.
But you either do not understand, or simply lie.

[your1970]

Quote: NordUral

But you either do not understand, or simply lie.

-
1) what I do not understand?
2) where am I lying? Please indicate if it does not bother you ....

[NordUral]

You are lying about the billions of Grudinin. I won’t go into details, this is an empty matter. And if you don’t lie, then you don’t understand.
What else can I tell you.
Here you draw your conclusions about the strong or weak ruble on the experience of the exporter. But besides, and mainly, the country lives on domestic product and import. And this is a different and sad story. But you don’t understand this?

[your1970]

Quote: NordUral

just lying.

Quote: NordUral

You sell noodles elsewhere, Sergey.

Quote: NordUral

You are lying about the billions of Grudinin.

- that is, those cited by me DOCUMENTALLY confirmed facts- which Grudinin himself does not deny- this is your opinion lie???? I gave you links to information about the assets of a closed joint-stock company, can you refute them?
You can justify something your words? or

Quote: NordUral

this is empty.

answer for your words ????

Quote: NordUral

What else can I tell you.

- you can’t say anything, absolutely ... you didn’t bring a fact to refute my words, just slogans ...

Z.Y. And that apparently completely covered you with something strong...

Quote: NordUral

Here are your conclusions about a strong or weak ruble do on your own experience an exporter. But besides, and mainly, the country lives on domestic product and import. And this is a different and sad story. But you don’t understand this?

You have at least a word about me weak or strong ruble at least once ???? why did you get that I am an exporter of something ???

[NordUral]

Let's start with the documented confirmed facts. Please link to these documents.
And bye with that

Have you even got a word about a weak or strong ruble at least once ???? why did you get the idea that I am an exporter of something ???

confused you with another Sergey. Sinful. You just write with him in unison.

[your1970]

Quote: NordUral

Let's start with documented facts. Please link to these documents.

That is, you do not read the opponent at all ????? strong discussion I'm trying to discuss something ....
I gave links a long time ago (yesterday at 17:07)

Quote: your1970

https://www.list-org.com/company/9532 - это ЗАО
https://www.list-org.com/man/6314 - а это он - как учредитель ряда фирм around Company

[NordUral]

Why, I read when there is something.

But it didn’t work out.

[your1970]

Quote: NordUral

But it didn’t work out.

- I open both links ...
try on the TIN there to go through the search
TIN / KPP: 5003009032 / 500301001

or by manager through a search on the right

[NordUral]

Sergey, I’ll definitely look. But according to what I found from Grudinin, I’m unlikely to change my opinion, or rather, that I will not change. So let's stay our way, and time will tell who is closest to us as a homespun truth.

[your1970]

Naturally !! I will not change my own either:

Quote: your1970

Z.Y. If, God forbid, someday he turns out to be the main candidate - I will vote for anyone, for Ksyushad, Baburin, or Zyuganov, and even for Platoshkin - at least it’s clear what to expect from them ......

is the most censored option

By the way, time has already shown - the village did not vote for him at all, the city voted for him - "Lives next to the workers !!!" ... that's happiness, God forgive me .....

[Lannan Shi]

Quote: your1970

WHO??

Yes, at least my neighbor is across the road. With real military merit, though not an officer, he was a soldier. Afghan, sapper, banner and combat. And not a quiet man, besides either escaping from the office, into which he was eager to, so eager while she was in fashion, or trampled. He’s still a fist, but he hasn’t rested a nail in life. Unlike the guarantor, he did not send his wife and children into free swimming. It plows really, not like a talker in a galley, but like a bee, from dawn to dusk. He lives by the principle - the man said, the man did. And not like our beloved, but he said it was a long time ago, and it’s not true, and in general it was not me, please treat with understanding.
That's real. Put them next to the usual hard workers, against the background of the guarantor, there will be some pluses. What is not an option? And do not say that you can’t. Mr. Putin also does not have a higher education in profile - the president of the Russian Federation. He generally has no education other than law. What from the government of the country is about the same distance as the penguins from nuclear physics.

[Aviator_]

Well, kinsurprise leads the nuclear industry, even received a medal (probably because it didn’t interfere very much)

[vadimtt]

Kindersurprise turned out to be a visionary and strong business executive. Whether he will be a good politician is unlikely. But there is always room for a miracle

[Romey]

What kind of business executive is there? Have you ever heard of the Baltic NPP? They killed hell knows how many lards, they brought infrastructure into a pure field, they built an ABA and even brought the reactor vessel. As a result, all this was not needed by anyone. Is this a thrift?

[vadimtt]

This is politics. Moreover, as a result, a nuclear power plant was built in Belarus, although there, too, Europe is shouting about "not buying dirty energy."

[NordUral]

Are you blessed, Vadim? Kindersurprise received the Union’s nuclear industry without creating anything. For fraud with a default of 98 in compensation.

[vadimtt]

What did he get? Figuratively speaking, he received then what Roskosmos is now. No more no less. And to default the same no side. Although what I'm talking about, it's useless.

[NordUral]

Although what I'm talking about, it's useless

That's right!
He received the frozen nuclear industry and the achievements of the Union. Received funding and it worked, as before. And Roskosmos plunders and kills a gang of thieves.

[Aviator_]

He was not any manager. His level is the level of Chubais, Boginsky and Dutov with Serdyukov.

[Malyuta]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

But I voted for him ... there were no more presidential contenders of this magnitude.

What the oooo? Why do you dare to humiliate Russia so much, saying that the head of the club in Dresden and the portfolio-bearer Sobchakka is a "large-scale" figure?

[Sergej1972]

I voted for him in 2012 and 2018. In 2000 and 2004, he voted for representatives of the Communist Party. If Putin is nominated again, I will vote again for him. Although in the parliamentary elections I will vote, most likely, for the Communist Party.

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: Sergej1972

I voted for him in 2012 and 2018. In 2000 and 2004, he voted for representatives of the Communist Party. If Putin is nominated again, I will vote again for him. Although in the parliamentary elections I will vote, most likely, for the Communist Party.

[NordUral]

You have a split personality, Sergey.

[Stirbjorn]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

And so far no one has been seen on the horizon who could reach for the presidency with him.

Vitaly Nalivkin from Usurijsk!

[FIR FIR]

But I voted for him ... there were no more presidential contenders of this magnitude.
And so far no one has been seen on the horizon who could reach for the presidency with him.

You need an order for this. Vote for the one who will become president anyway.
And it doesn’t matter if you voted or not. There are no other options. Someone here recently beat in the chest with his fist that Putin was tired and would not go on .... God, capitalism has won. Money rose above conscience, desires, goals and life. Rockefellers, Rothschild will win in this country.

[NordUral]

Not they will win, but we will lose if we think and do so.

[wowka]

And until it is observed on the horizon

not really in such a huge country with such a huge population
there is at least one more "left-handed"?
Is it just wildness or is it really degradation? how is it so? 146 as of January 745, 098 and for these 1 million there is only one who can? He is the only smart, historian, decisive, caring, indisputable, competent ... "We!" ... Pluralis majestatis and so on, and so on, and so on ...?!

[Svarog]

Quote: Incvizitor

I never voted for him, but now seeing how all the dirt is writhing from him, I’m thinking of voting.

Standard training manual .. Are you all in white? Do you see the dirt in him? He smacks of it. It smacks of the near-by official, of whom there have already been many noted ..

Today, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that he does not exclude the possibility of running for the next presidential term if the amendments to the Basic Law are finally adopted.

So for this purpose he is changing the Constitution. Hypocrite..

[Same lech]

So for this purpose he is changing the Constitution. Hypocrite..

As the people decide it will be so ... his own words.
But how will the people decide?

[Svarog]

Quote: The same Lech

So for this purpose he is changing the Constitution. Hypocrite..

As the people decide it will be so ... his own words.
But how will the people decide?

Yes, people do not decide .. the people what kind of pension reform was? No, of course .. but they accepted it .. and here too, the new Constitution is already for sale .. and the dances with the tambourine reset to zero are satisfied.

[Same lech]

Yes, people do not decide .. the people what kind of pension reform was?

Well, the people ultimately decide anyway one way or another ... who would have thought that the people would not support the CPSU Central Committee in the days of the GKChP ... communist power collapsed like a house of cards ... it can also happen to Putin if he ceases to rely on the broad strata of the people and loses the trust of the people ... no vertical power will stand if there is no firm support in its foundation in the face of support for ordinary citizens.

[Svarog]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

no vertical power will stand if there is no rigid support in its foundation in the face of support for ordinary citizens.

In the future, I agree .. without popular support in any way, but in the short term he apparently decided not to bother ..

[Same lech]

Wait and see.

[parusnik]

Did the people decide on a plebiscite to increase the presidential term?

[Same lech]

Did the people decide on a plebiscite to increase the presidential term?
No, of course ... the State Duma deputies decided for him ... took the initiative in resolving this issue ... Comrade Putin completely agrees with this ... what's wrong ... we live in a fun time ... a time of change.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

deputies of the State Duma decided for it ... took the initiative

Lyokha, are you sure that the deputies took the initiative? My sclerosis does not agree.

[parusnik]

Oh how! That is, in conflict with the Constitution and Federal Law

[hydrox]

And who said that d. extension of time?
After all, it is possible to hold a nationwide referendum on renewal or non-renewal of powers once in 2 years (i.e. a plebiscite).
He did not satisfy the population with his work — he went away, satisfied — he remained for another 2 years.

[AUL]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

.can also happen to Putin if he ceases to rely on broad sections of the people and loses the trust of the people ...

And when did he rely on the "broad strata"? He has a slightly different support - the Rotenbergs, Chubais, Sechins and Timchenko!

[Same lech]

Potanin was forgotten with Norilsk Nickel.

[parusnik]

Same lech

it can also happen to Putin if he ceases to rely on broad sections of the people

.... I received especially popular support when I announced the Pension Reform ... I relied on the shoulders of the people ....

[Aviator_]

He lived then in Lyubertsy. The GKChP was completely overwhelmed, and the hard workers in the Lyubertsy buses then said with sadness - well, why did these GKChPshniks not even turn to the hard workers? We wanted it ourselves, but what happened?

[2 Level Advisor]

Alexey, you are an idealist .. But nothing will happen .. Now the "vertical" stands and does not move .. among my acquaintances, if he has 20 percent of supporters, then it's not bad .. this is clearly not "broad strata of people with confidence" .. The vertical is stable even without the support of the people, because it does not actually depend on the elections, but how else will the people influence it?

[Vladimir61]

Quote: Svarog

Yes, people do not solve anything ..

Because people like you are "power fighters", they think that they are the people! The people, these are those who today are not showing their position on websites and blogs, but those who "plow and forge" its future. And the people at the elections will have their say. And "fighters against power" will only have to howl at the moon. Not long left!

[Harry cuper]

So you, too, are not people. You don’t forge or plow, but on the website howl to your employer

[flicker]

people what kind of pension reform was? No, of course .. but they accepted her ..

1941, what kind of war was the people? No, of course ... but it has begun.

[Aleksandre]

Quote: The same Lech

But how will the people decide?

Once a psychology teacher told me: "Sasha, most people perceive the process of" thinking "as a headache, and if you think for them and give some intelligible and understandable thoughts, then your decision will become their decision." And I have not yet had a chance to be convinced of her wrong.

[Same lech]

and if you think for them and give some intelligible and understandable thoughts to them, then your decision will be their decision

Yeah ... probably Pop Gapon also thought leading a thousandth crowd of people under execution.

[Aleksandre]

Quote: The same Lech

and if you think for them and give some intelligible and understandable thoughts to them, then your decision will be their decision

Yeah ... probably Pop Gapon also thought leading a thousandth crowd of people under execution.

And as a result: the priest led, and the people followed. Does this somehow contradict the statement?

[Same lech]

There is no approval ... only Putin is not Gapon.

[Aleksandre]

Quote: The same Lech

There is no approval ... only Putin is not Gapon.

Well, if this woman was interested in moral questions (where to lead), if they were interested, she did not voice them at all, preferring training in a practical (how to lead) plane.

[ul_vitalii]

Quote: Aleksandre

Quote: The same Lech

But how will the people decide?

Once a psychology teacher told me: "Sasha, most people perceive the process of" thinking "as a headache, and if you think for them and give some intelligible and understandable thoughts, then your decision will become their decision." And I have not yet had a chance to be convinced of her wrong.

Well, you are not the first as a listener and as that teacher on the Internet, but what did he teach or teach you.

[Same lech]

and what he taught or taught you.

Oooh ... he taught a lot of things ... his KGB school is not an exam for you ... all the same, to hold out in power for twenty years with the most severe pressure from all sides ... you must agree to mediocrity.
Remember at least what kind of country he adopted, he was from the binge of Yeltsin ...

[military_cat]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

all the same, to hold on to power for twenty years with the most severe pressure from all sides ... you must agree to mediocrity is not possible.

Any ordinary African dictator can do it. By the way, he also fools his African electorate about the brutal pressure from America and the need to rally in the face of an external threat, this is not our unique propaganda invention.

[Sahalinets]

all the same, to hold on to power for twenty years with the most severe pressure from all sides ... you must agree to mediocrity is not possible.

Well then Mugabe is your idol! 37 years lasted. Great! And how everything blossomed in Zimbabwe ...

[Aleksandre]

Quote: ul_vitalii

Well, you are not the first as a listener and as that teacher on the Internet, but what did he teach or teach you.

Umm ... Sorry for the question: is Russian not your native language? I must confess that I didn’t understand anything at all.

[Vladimir61]

Quote: Aleksandre

Once a psychology teacher told me

And my father, for this reason, always reminds me of a famous joke:
Moysha and Sarah go to bed - Moysha cannot toss and turn to sleep ...
Sarah asks - "What's the matter?"
- Yes, I borrowed a ruble from Abram, now I'm suffering - I must give, not
I want it, my head hurts
Sara knocks on the wall and says:
- Abram. did you take a ruble?
- Yes.
- So, he will not return it to you. - turns to Moishe and says:
- Now let his head hurt

[surok1]

The blessing is one who makes you think, and not powder your brain.

[parusnik]

Yes, it doesn’t decide, according to the Constitution and the Federal Law, the people don’t accept the amendments. According to these documents, the Federal Assembly and meetings at the level of subjects on behalf of the people decide.

[ltc35]

Taki Ella already told everything how the people decide. I have nothing against the sun, but it’s time to turn on the human conscience.

[Ingvar 72]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

But how will the people decide?

Everything is already decided. Pamfilova voiced a month ago.

[Revival]

Yeah, a coincidence happened by chance, so there is no turnout threshold, apparently just forgot about it, and generally changed the election law again, a coincidence ....

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

But how will the people decide?

What kind of people do you mean?

[Interlocutor]

So for this purpose he is changing the Constitution. Hypocrite..

Well, go and vote against the amendments to the Constitution. Business then.
You are against, I am for: 0-0.

[Revival]

Such a wording sounds primitive already, change, this one doesn't work anymore

[antivirus]

I am famous for the small spoons and aircraft carriers of 70 tons of VI

not noticeable comment - the VVP covers the receiver, Mishustin's office is quietly working and the receiver sits unlit until the election campaign, then - bats - the address of the GDP: "I ask you to support the young ..., I'm sure of him, we prepared the team together."

[Bomb]

Now, as a humpbacked horse, it dives from one boiler to another, rejuvenates and disappears for 40 years.

[cat Rusich]

I would propose such an amendment - deputies to the State. The Russian Duma should be elected no more than 2 (two) times, without a state pension. Sat in the state. The Duma is 10 years old and that's enough.

[zenion]

He forgot to add - if you don’t choose me, then the tanks will start shooting again.

[Asad]

Well, who would doubt it!

[Ghost of reagan]

Democracy according to "Russian" .... The largest and at the same time the shortest anecdote in history.

[Same lech]

Well, straight Reagan blew from the grave ... close the window in the crypt.

[Incvizitor]

For Russians, this word "village of kratia" has always been abusive.

[military_cat]

Quote: Incvizitor

For Russians, this word "village of kratia" has always been abusive.

Oh, but once upon a time at the Novgorod veche government issues were resolved ...

[Interlocutor]

Democracy

Find a better country. For example, Switzerland. The garbage in the bag of the wrong color discard and order. After a couple of days, the finesman is 300 francs

[Tartar]

head of state says majority of Russians support amendment

Why then to vote if the head of state already knows everything

[parusnik]

Well, as it should, especially since the CEC staff will ensure that the percentage of those who vote for amendments to the Constitution does not exceed 100%.

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: parusnik

CEC staff will ensure that the percentage of those who vote for amendments to the Constitution does not exceed 100%.

So, in Microsoft Office Excel, you can drive a fairly simple formula into a cell. This is now taught even in the secondary school kids.

[Sahalinets]

Lord, yes, you declare yourself already president for life, what crumple bread? Brezhnev sat out, now the Queen of England is next in line. His feet will carry him out of the Kremlin ...

[parusnik]

Lord, yes, you declare yourself already president for life, what crumple bread?

.... These will be the next amendments to the Constitution, but a bit later, during the period of the first zeroed period ..

[Sahalinets]

Well yes. Putin’s stability lies in the fact that he consistently violates absolutely all his promises. He promised not to be elected for a third term, not to change the Constitution for himself ... And how he promised not to raise the retirement age! While I am president, there will be no increase!

[Vadim237]

Promises are not a document, officially supported by anything, you can promise whatever you want, but whether it will turn out to be done in practice because you want a completely different question, the world does not stand still, everything changes and this also plays a significant role in fulfilling promises .

[kot28.ru]

Merkel forgot to remember :))) People choose it means so be it!

[Hypatius]

Brezhnev sat out ...

Three popes elected for life!

[cat Rusich]

Benedict 16 - 19.04.2005/28.02.2013/XNUMX - XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX The first Pope abdicated voluntarily. Francis the acting Pope is alive and well, which is what he wants for you.

[Liam]

Quote: cat Rusich

Benedict 16 - 19.04.2005/28.02.2013/XNUMX - XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX First Pope Abdicated

Far from the first. At least the seventh. But most likely the tenth

[Shkworen]

yes who would doubt :)

[Vladyka Ecumenical]

And I would like to see Platoshkina as President.

[Sergey39]

Ds, this is now in trend. Choose a clown president.

[Svarog]

Quote: Sergey39

Ds, this is now in trend. Choose a clown president.

And this is an insult to power .. we choose the same president Did not expect from you

[Sergey39]

The president and I are all right. But many people really want to change him to some kind of clown. There are no real candidates on the horizon.

[2 Level Advisor]

And the same Stalin (was it really someone who was seriously looking at Stalin then?), Lenin until 1917, or even Putin until 1999, could you have looked very much ahead of time? And what, therefore, had to leave the EBN, for example, if it had not left? Who was the real candidate in politics in 1999 before Putin was introduced? Zyuganov, Yavlinsky, Zhirinovsky? Also there was no one to get it except for EBN .. The logic is slightly flawed, don’t you?

[Vladyka Ecumenical]

The clown is you and your kind.

[Revival]

As I understand it, you are now so mercilessly trampled on .....
You didn’t like zeroing at all.

[New Year day]

Quote: Sergey39

Choose a clown president.

still need to figure out which is more dangerous for the country: president is a clown, or is a president a clown?

[Same lech]

And I would like to see Platoshkina as President.

Platoshkin is too impulsive ... maybe he can crack his opponent with a club with his club.
The president must have an iron limit.

[Svarog]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

Platoshkin is too impulsive ... maybe he can crack his opponent with a club with his club.

Oh, the club in the government wouldn’t hurt, and officials wouldn’t hinder it ..

[parusnik]

The same LEKHA [/ b [b]]

The president must have an iron limit.

... How many times he said that he would not be re-elected or that he would not increase the retirement age and “you walk like this, go to school, and then, bam! And the second shift!” .. Here you really need an iron endurance.

[your1970]

Quote: The same Lech

And I would like to see Platoshkina as President.

Platoshkin is too impulsive ... maybe he can crack his opponent with a club with his club.
The president must have an iron limit.

и a decent program.
And not populist sentences like
"13. Direct election the population of judges of district and regional courts. A candidate for a judge is not entitled to work in the bodies of the Investigative Committee, the police and the prosecutor's office for 5 years before being elected a judge. Judges report to voters every month with live webcast. "
-we have chosen the head of the district in the 90s then the truth was planted almost immediately ...
"19. Restoration of the union state on the basis of the republics of the former USSR on the basis of the free expression of the will of their citizens." state Do you agree with the CIS? Given the positions of the country 404, Georgia, Turkmenistan, the Limitrofs, Moldova, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan - we will only have Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Tajikistan ...

[parusnik]

They will not allow him to rattle the shackles as a fighter against the regime, to be a presidential candidate .. Yes, and then with the ruling class, he did not come to any compromise ... If there was a compromise, he would not be arrested ... Allende was also a compromise with the ruling class, but he was forced to go further in his reforms, under the pressure of the people. Al'ende still chose the people because they believed in him. They deposed him for the wrong choice ...

[hydrox]

So, the Russian people, too, no one has chosen in the last 30 years of liberal power ...

[Sergej1972]

About 37% of the voters who took part in them voted for Allende in the popular elections. According to the then Chilean legislation, in such cases the second round of the popular elections was not held, and the president was elected by the parliament from the two candidates who received the largest number of votes in the popular elections. His supporters agreed with the Christian Democrats, and as a result of a vote by parliament, Allende became president of Chile.

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: Sergej1972

About 37% of the voters who took part in them voted for Allende in the popular elections.

Just think, 37% ... We have a chance, 146% of voters voted!
This is SCALE !!!

[Vadim237]

I would like to see this populist canister at the mall.

[CommanderDIVA]

It’s too early to give forecasts who will be the head of the country after 2024, GDP may replay the topic, the best option for him to leave is the head of the Security Council, with the appointment of a worthy successor and sensible prime minister

[Sergej1972]

Americans and most Latin American countries do without prime ministers at all; they have enough presidents.
.

[Cat]

I’ll insert my 5 kopecks because of the curb. into the all-Russian ... uh .. discussion.
Personally, I am not a fan of GDP. But! If we had a politician of this scale and similar views in Ukraine, 90 percent would vote for him (even in Bandera oblasts). But no, all sorts of excrement pops up ... If you want, like ours, send him to retire.

[maiman61]

Stink from dill!

[Ragnar Lodbrok]

Today, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that he does not exclude the possibility of running for the next presidential term if the amendments to the Basic Law are finally adopted.

Who would doubt .. Long live the autocracy!

[Same lech]

Who would doubt .. Long live the autocracy!

Well, they survived until the autocracy.

[alone]

over the past 100 years, people have never decided anything when choosing power ... And as for the nomination, it was a half-expected statement and all this fuss is done so that he can sit on the Kremlin until his death ...
P.S. One thing is just alarming .. Now everyone who will be in power (After him) will make amendments to the constitution on their own whims .. And this is a direct threat to the state

[Knell wardenheart]

Deja vu, not otherwise. I wonder what "new" motto will be invented? What do they promise straight from the tin? Definitely not for nothing that "Santa Barbara" came here in due time.

[Benedict]

Well it will start now !!!!! Down with the "bloody regime" ..
The crowd rushed here already .. and trample everyone in a row !!!
Well, let's ..

Goodbye comrades ..

[parusnik]

Today, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that he does not exclude the possibility of running for the next presidential term if the amendments to the Basic Law are finally adopted.

.... What hypocrisy The Federal Assembly adopted the amendments, it remains for the meetings of the subjects .... and that’s all ... And the elections will essentially be uncontested, because against the background of other candidates Putin will look like a candidate that only votes for him ... And the EP in the Duma will also gain the majority ... Such faith in the party ....

[Same lech]

Such faith in the party ...

So I want to blur the slogans ...
“The party is the mind, honor and conscience of our era”; “The party is our helmsman!” “The people and the party are one!”

[parusnik]

[B]

“The party is the mind, honor and conscience of our era”; “The party is our helmsman!” “The people and the party are one!” [

/bapter....And you doubt it?

[Same lech]

I am afraid that those who doubt after voting for the new Constitution will fall into the category of enemies of the people and the party.

[parusnik]

It's like giving a drink ... Especially when you are offered your historical truth. Just tell me that this is not right ... And according to the adopted amendment, "along the tundra, by rail" ...

[hydrox]

EP I see bound and wandering in Syktyvkar: in Siberia, EP has already arbitrarily sold all the taiga to the Chinese.

[GELEZNII_KAPUT]

Well, leave the government and Medvedev Dmitry Anatolyevich return, he loves us very much!

[Same lech]

Medvedev Dmitry Anatolyevich

Just forget it began to be reminded again.

[hydrox]

This is only in Free Texas!

[Tomich3]

And then there will be an imitation of elections with the "opposition" (communists and the Liberal Democratic Party).

[AUL]

Ksyusha can still get out of naphthalene.

[Vadim237]

Naphthalene Horse cannot stand it - take pity on it.

[Senior seaman]

Actually, no one doubted.
Time to leave, few people succeeded ...

[Anatole Klim]

In 2024, Putin will be 72 years old. Stalin lived to be 73 years old, Brezhnev to 75, the truth is in insanity. Where is Putin in such a hurry, because before the elections of 2024 another 4 years, even the coronavirus is no longer a hindrance, all government agencies urgently approved the amendments, now people are being driven to vote. Quickly reset to zero, what did they think there? New reforms on the impoverishment of the population, where much further?

[Sahalinets]

"- How do you feel about the possibility of extending the presidential term and the possibility of being elected to this post three or more times?"

- I have a negative attitude to this.

“Are you really going to leave the post in four years?”

- Firstly, you still need to live until March 2004. And only after that we can talk about the next elections in 2008. But even now I can say: I am against anyone, no matter what good considerations they are guided by, violate the Constitution of our country. "
Putin 2003.
"I was not tempted to stay for a third term - never. From the first day of my work as President of the Russian Federation, I decided for myself that I would not violate the current Constitution."
Putin 2008.
"I will not change the Constitution for myself."
Putin 2012.
Does anyone else believe him?

[Sklendarka]

Quote: Sahalinets

"- How do you feel about the possibility of extending the presidential term and the possibility of being elected to this post three or more times?"

- I have a negative attitude to this.

“Are you really going to leave the post in four years?”

- Firstly, you still need to live until March 2004. And only after that we can talk about the next elections in 2008. But even now I can say: I am against anyone, no matter what good considerations they are guided by, violate the Constitution of our country. "
Putin 2003.
"I was not tempted to stay for a third term - never. From the first day of my work as President of the Russian Federation, I decided for myself that I would not violate the current Constitution."
Putin 2008.
"I will not change the Constitution for myself."
Putin 2012.
Does anyone else believe him?

,, ... will come again, start to fulfill two norms ... ''

[Magic archer]

All amendments except zeroing are good. But. For 20 years of reign (we also consider Dimon, since it was already clear who was in charge), it is time and honor to know! Is it really like that on the throne !? Already even those who used to be FOR now are against !!! Tired !!! Get away as it should.

[kot28.ru]

Why do you think for everyone? People will vote in favor. Not because he likes him, but because they don’t want a new unrest. It will be so.

[strelokmira]

All, but what about 7 senators for a permanent term, and lifelong immunity after the expiration of the presidential term?

[Vadim237]

And who will touch him after the presidential term - he’s like it, you know, the bearer of all state secrets of Russia for 20 years.

[surok1]

I think life-long senatorism is too much like an oligarchy.

[Region68]

Which amendment is good for example

[Hypatius]

For example, public authority. There was the power of the people, and in contrast to the power of the public. Thus, logically, this is anti-people and occupation.
Public power is established during the formation of states or the occupation of countries. When there are no citizens, or people are deprived of citizenship.
Consolidation of the fact that Russian democracy (the demos class) bribes-forces the people to go on plebeysyt (to confirm entry into the plebos class).

[Vadim237]

What kind of public - the public in our country is very mottled, there will be no consensus on everything.

[Ravil_Asnafovich]

No, well, do you want alesha YouTube?

[Region68]

And why doesn’t it suit you?

[Saratoga833]

You can tear the chair from zero only with your head! So he will sit until the performance of Swan Lake!

[4ekist]

With your analytical mind, it’s just the right time to solve problems on a global scale.

[Sahalinets]

Enjoy it!

[Sergey Averchenkov]

And I'm for. Who builds the ships? Maybe you? Who is rebuilding the army and navy? Maybe you? Ask yourself this simple question.

[Sahalinets]

People are recovering labor, and officials are stealing. And who appointed these officials?

[Sergey Averchenkov]

I well remember this question - while Putin is in power, the West will not shine ... If they change to something more radical ... I am for it. Hardworking people work on order.

[dvina71]

Quote: Sahalinets

People are recovering labor, and officials are stealing. And who appointed these officials?

Painfully reminds a liberal mantra ..- The Soviet people defeated in the war, and Stalin climbed out of the bunker in May 45th ..

[Dronza]

So this is his work, he was chosen for this. Why dignify what he should do so. The question is not what he does, but what he should do more and better.

[New Year day]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

And I'm for. Who builds the ships? Maybe you? Who is rebuilding the army and navy? Maybe you?

Putin Build personally? -And I thought, a country, hard workers? Whose money is it for? “On your own?” “I thought, on our taxes?”

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

Ask yourself this simple question.

Who builds and whose money? And who steals them?

[Sergey Averchenkov]

Yes, Putin is building, he personally. Although maybe you personally build? You know, when I came to this site, it seemed to me that I would find real patriots here. But what do I see? Fuck you in the ass.

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

You know, when I came to this site, it seemed to me that I would find real patriots here. But what do I see?

You see ?
What, highly patriotic news!
Is it us too? Which "in the priest ..." are to blame?

[Vadim237]

And that a few years ago, Russia invested 150 billion in US assets - the current 6,8 is nothing at all.

[Sergey Averchenkov]

About how many wonderful Ukrainians we are educated spirit. Are you in the pope? I would look at you if you had a million ... Like you would like on this ass - you would invest and only rejoice.

[Revival]

Especially the fleet, yeah

[Sergey Averchenkov]

Yes, but what bothers you?

[Revival]

Confuses:
a miserable number of class 1 and 2 ships laid down and at the same time built over these 20 years. And without them, the fleet is not the Fleet.
2. Is it a feat for building ships in general for such a country, or how should this be done in principle?

[Sergey Averchenkov]

Let's start with the age - I'm 56. And it was during the time of Yeltsin that the army and navy were abandoned ... and raising it is much harder than rebuilding. I understand that everyone wants destroyers, but the situation is that we all pissed off (thanks to Yeltsin). Now slowly we are slowly recovering

[Overlock]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

(thanks to Yeltsin)

why not the Pechenegs and Polovtsy?

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Sergey Averchenkov

Now slowly we are slowly recovering

It can be seen, for example, with the PD-50.

[Vadim237]

This trough was already 40 years old at the time of the dive and all these PDs were made in another country by order of the USSR.

[Vadim237]

Russia has never built ships using low visibility technology before, and the USSR had modern problems with modern marine diesel engines to localize foreign ones, but even this did not work - now we are starting to do everything ourselves from here and the delays.

[Sergey Averchenkov]

I now see all your answers - "Polovtsy and Pechenegs", "on the example of the PD-50", "This trough" ... You are skating, more than you, no one can hate Russia. They have disguised themselves as Russians, but you just do not understand what the lard carries from you a mile away. Ugh on you.

[Tank jacket]

About prowling and sabotaging decisions, officials stop working correctly noticed. And some of the most gifted begin to poke harder ...

[Fungus]

Great news

[Benedict]

Who will vote for Putin and Costituti, give me a MINUS !!!!!
Goes to statistics ..

[Same lech]

Who will vote for Putin and Costituti, give me a MINUS !!!

I’ll put you a plus, but still vote for Putin and the constitution.

[SS-18]

read the article before dinner .. indignation knew no bounds. wife fed meatballs with mashed potatoes .. like and nothing article))

[Vadim237]

The cutlet from the heat of indignation did not get stuck in the throat.

[strelokmira]

What an impatient, even before the referendum did not endure

[Nikolay87]

They waited until Medved was removed, they thought "that now we will heal", now the constitution is not correct, now we will change it and live ?!
Let's be honest, there are a lot of things that need to be changed and added to the constitution, and this needs to be done thoroughly, conducting discussions in scientific circles, and not so that the president said the main amendments, others added that they had time and that's it. On the good side, then it probably needs to be completely rewritten, and not disguised as "zeroing" under the "abolition of dual citizenship for officials." Are we now suffering from the fact that officials have dual citizenship or from the fact that they transfer money abroad?
They will accept, they will not accept, what's the difference ?! For an ordinary citizen, nothing will change, and politics, whether external or internal, will not fundamentally change.
So ...

Pysyz This vote created only more questions than it will give possible answers. This is normal?

[maiman61]

Tired of worse than turnip! Happy people, leave!

[Region68]

You don’t mind .. Why should he leave

[Sergej1972]

But I'm not tired.

[Malyuta]

Quote: Sergej1972

But I'm not tired.

And he will not ask you, your opinion is not at all interesting to him, he has a bunker, rich friends, a tunnel and a fear for his own life.

[surok1]

Some judge by themselves. Produce substance and throw at an opponent. What the vessel is filled with, then pours out of it.

[Oleg Skvortsov]

Will we just watch him put a new jaw to improve diction? It’s high time to go to the monastery — to remorse sins, and not to think about the Russian girl. Although, what a Russian - about chain dogs grown for 20 years all the thoughts

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: Oleg Skvortsov

Will we just watch him put a new jaw to improve diction?

Over the years, electronic technology has taken leaps and bounds.

[Harry cuper]

No one doubted what this scam was about.

[steelmaker]

Judging by the comments, how can Putin support 70%? And 25% is unlikely to be typed!

[yfast]

Many retirees, tarred by TV, will be for carrots. But the Darkest One began to understand the continuity of power for some time now as "nothing without me". But after resetting to zero in 2024, the elections themselves must be won, and many are already nauseated by hypocrisy. Was good, the chair ruined.

[Nikolay87]

It doesn't smell like carrots, but rather for "stability". Nobody wants turmoil in old age

[Nikolay87]

You will not believe how many people on the street who live with animal needs, who are not at all interested in politics, economics, philosophy ... it is important for them how to cut the dough now and arrange their lives according to all the rules of a consumer society. I personally have a sister and her husband like that. It doesn't smell of any critical thinking. Any leading questions that force you to look at the situation from a different angle cause children's emotional reactions (such as "you just have to argue or object") and the more fun it is to watch how they change their mind depending on the situation and each time tell how their decision / opinion was incredibly correct, although six months ago they claimed absolutely different things and firmly believed in their fidelity
Here is such a schizophrenia comrades

[kot28.ru]

judging by the minuses 21-10 it’s only here where various pro-Western trolls rave about 50 Not like your two percent

[Slipper 2]

Only Vladimir Vladimirovich today, no other Russia is needed

[vladimirvn]

And why does this news not surprise me?

[parusnik]

Because the amazing is nearby, but it is forbidden ....

[7,62x54]

Oh, come on, break the comedy. All the tweaks are in full view.

[Poetry]

Volodya.

Then when the hand of his venal
We have the rules of a democrat everywhere
There was Tsar Boris, drunk and wicked,
And Grozny was like Stalingrad,

When all the "young reformers"
Kicked our long-suffering Russia
Chubais with Nemtsov, other innovators
They also tried to pretend to be the messiah,

When scum without conscience and honor
Flocked from overseas lands,
There was a time of fear, a time of tin,
Everything was so brutal and boorish

And the enemy of yesterday was at home with us,
Walked so important with the queen's face
"The end of Russia" - he thought from behind the cordon,
And laughed out of tune (we say friends)

When the factories bought up for a penny
Industry has been smashed into trash,
It seemed reptiles: we are almost primates,
They wanted to quarrel, to plant in the corners.

We are already close to the collapse, like? ..
The last nail was picked up by a cowboy.
But at that moment he appeared. Volodya.
Our longboat has been replaced by the steering.

The drunk boatswain handed over the helm,
Discharged ashore in the very first port,
Volodya to them disgusted all plans
And there was a step to cross the line.

All these scum left
Still not believing in our wonderful salvation.
We politely sent them! In Domodedovo.
They began to recover from shock.

What happened after, we will not remember.
A lot was left behind.
Thank you for everything, comrade Putin.
For the fact that we remained a country.

2020 Kingisepp.

[mag nit]

He will only go forward with his feet.

[Sergo go]

Quote: The same Lech

But I voted for him ... there were no more presidential contenders of this magnitude.
And so far no one has been seen on the horizon who could reach for the presidency with him.

shitty when the brain sees nothing further

[Same lech]

shitty when the brain sees nothing further

Sergo Go, you probably share your experience ... sympathize with you ... develop your brain, it will still be useful to you.

[Region-25.rus]

Naaaaaaaa ... what a surprise! I never would have thought.

[Region-25.rus]

Quote: Sahalinets

Yeah, man! For 20 years your idol has steered the country and it is necessary, we are again in a critical situation!

aha .. "it never happened and now again ... again!"

[Sergo go]

Quote: steel maker

Judging by the comments, how can Putin support 70%? And 25% is unlikely to be typed!

he spares no money on his propaganda on TV and social networks, so again we are waiting for 70% +

[hermit]

Let him finally be declared emperor! And end this comedy of choices.

[Dimon5678]

No wonder he holds a meaningless referendum despite the coronavirus. He wants to rule 36 years ahead of Brezhnev wants to overtake Stalin. Although he himself said that those who have been in power for 10 years are starting to go crazy

[alone]

Quote: Dimon5678

Although he himself said that those who have been in power for 10 years are starting to go crazy

If we compare what he said and what he did in 20 years, a very interesting book will turn out called "How he fooled everyone in 20 years"

[maiman61]

Well, he was right! Here is the result.

[Стена]

This is not a referendum, but a plebiscite. The authorities are afraid to hold a referendum.

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: Dimon5678

No wonder he holds a meaningless referendum despite the coronavirus.

Not "despite", but thanks to the operation - "coronavirus".

[kot28.ru]

Well yes
That’s all the Kremlin muddied
Wuhan, China, Europe, the states, so what is it, the whole world subjugated to the gallery?

[AAK]

Over the 20 years of leadership of the country, it is not possible to find and prepare a relatively worthy successor for 1 term, after which again, without any nullification, you can go for 2 legal presidential terms - this is not serious for a serious politician ...

[Jack O'Neill]

Oh, what a surprise, Putin for a new term. Not again, but again, as they say ...

[demo]

A few days earlier, the head of state said that the majority of Russians supported the introduction of amendments.

Very doubtful.
For example.
My family has around 50 people. People of our age.
None, I emphasize, not one supports the idea of ​​voting for amendments.
Cause? Zeroing the deadlines.
Everything else does not count.
My adult children are about the same.
Another hundred people are against.
Already 150.
And they all have families.
Those. almost 500 people.

I, and many, are interested in, and who is "for".
1. The party EP.
2. Appointment governors.
3. Security officials.
4. City-region managers.
5. The initiators, the successors of Zakharchenko-Sugrobov-Cherkalin, etc.
6. Close to the circle of GDP (Rotenberg, Kovalchuk and the like).

So think about who needs and for what these amendments.

According to the president of the country, he personally firmly believes in the correctness of the adoption of amendments to the Constitution, since the current Basic Law was adopted in the "difficult period - when tanks fired at the parliament."

This passage can be understood as follows: the adopted Constitution of 93 gave dictatorial powers to stabilize the country.
So, let’s continue the thought, the current situation implies stability.
Therefore, the powers of the head of state should be reduced to a minimum.
Time, tea, not military. But tanks do not shoot at the parliament or at the demonstrators?

[maiman61]

Oh, don’t talk about security officials. They are not stupid people and not officials, they are one of us!

[demo]

This is until you (God save you from this!) Did not fall into their firm and tenacious paws.
Then you have a diametrically opposite opinion.
That is how they look at us as legitimate prey.
I know what I'm talking about.
I have relatives both among those and among those who came to them.

Granted power to one person over another, even short-term, quickly turns the bearer of power into a predatory animal.
The human appearance is deceiving, my friend.

[maiman61]

I know that very well! This is an axiom! But they do not relate to power the way the authorities would like to think.

[Sklendarka]

Quote: maiman61

Oh, don’t talk about security officials. They are not stupid people and not officials, they are one of us!

... only without a tail ....

[vladimirvn]

Who else will vote "for"? Retired grandmothers. They will be reminded that the pension has been added this year and will be added next year. Student activists who are promised social elevators. Office plankton, which is good under any power, as long as it is not touched. Teachers, doctors, under the watchful eye of their leaders. So a good percentage will be typed. The rest will be finished.

[demo]

You can't put a Cerberus over every teacher and doctor.
But at the expense of those whom you called "office plankton", we can say the following.
More precisely, I will repeat what I said earlier.
The situation in the country is not encouraging.
Didn’t work: cafes, restaurants, baths, laundries, fitness clubs, entertainment centers. Many enterprises producing essentials and much, much more.
This is millions of people sitting at home, not getting paid.
But many of them were "dizzy with success."
And they took a mortgage to purchase apartments, cars, trips abroad, etc.
And it may happen that there is nowhere to go after self-isolation (a word that came up with the opposite!).
And all that apparent well-being may begin to collapse.
And people, even "white collar", even though "office plankton" are not insane.
They understand how it all ends for them.
Loss of property, loss of status, change in established habits and much more.
So who should they say thanks for that?
What amendments will they vote for?
If this is due to the fault of "zeroed" happened (and who else then)?

[Стена]

You are wrong. He said an absolute majority.

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: demo

A few days earlier, the head of state said that the majority of Russians supported the introduction of amendments.

Very doubtful.
For example.
My family has around 50 people. People of our age.
None, I emphasize, not one supports the idea of ​​voting for amendments.
Cause? Zeroing the deadlines.
Everything else does not count.
My adult children are about the same.
Another hundred people are against.
Already 150.
And they all have families.
Those. almost 500 people.

Did the president talk to you all about this? Did you ask?
No.
That is why you did not get into the "majority" ...

[demo]

Thank you.
Here are the goodies.

[Prisoner]

It seems like no one ruled it out.

[wellaut]

For twenty years he insisted on the immutability of the Constitution, regardless of wishes of an individual, and now he doesn’t rule out a new term
Oh Lord, pharisaism....
And again, “I am not myself, the people are asking for the kingdom”
They force the poor man to row in the galleys until his very last breath... But he can’t refuse, his upbringing apparently doesn’t allow it.
At the KGB school they were taught to carry out orders unquestioningly.

[Alexey from Perm]

Who would doubt that)))

[Sklendarka]

Damn, I was surprised!!! and who would have thought?

[Ross xnumx]

Putin did not rule out the possibility of nominating for a new term

Why not?

Oh, and harmful copper pipes! Slavushka, glavushka, sweet poison!

And, probably, along with the “nullification,” all plans, breakthroughs, promises, promises, assurances, unfulfilled orders will be reset and forgotten... And only one thing will shine with a clear prophecy:

Everything will melt like ice, only one thing will remain untouched - the glory of Vladimir Vladimirovich, the glory of United Russia. Too much has been sacrificed.

How will voters perceive this “cunning move”? How will they once again want to believe someone who “lied like crazy”?

[certero]

If there are no candidates for the post of successor, it means the president has done a terrible job. This is part of his direct responsibilities - creating such a system in the country that there will always be politicians capable of leading this country.
I'll be honest, I'm very disappointed in the president.

[Unknown]

whoever doubted it would sit on the throne for life. As soon as Yeltsin showed him to the people, out of nowhere, and said love and favor, then it became clear to those who were used to thinking with their own heads that this was forever, period. and this clownery, called elections, is carried out for the amusement of the crowd, and in order to demonstrate legitimacy to the West. look, because the people chose. means correct. and our elections are the most democratic, for every taste and choice. If the liberal democrats want their own kingdom, for God’s sake, let’s select how many such candidates I can remember, I’m afraid to make a mistake, and Yavlinsky, and Prokhorov, and even Sobchak, where then they dug it up, vote, whoever is in the way will still not pass. this time, they’ll dig up someone else, find someone as a last resort, but there’s Navalny, why not a candidate? If you want such a vigorous Natsik and your own man, here’s Zhirinovsky, vote who’s in the way. who has nostalgia for the USSR, here you go, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation with Zyuganov. but Genady Andreevich, either wiser or feeling ashamed, didn’t take part in the last performance; over there he put out Sternina and let him take part, what a pity or something. and so on in little things, all sorts of Mironovs, and even, who remembers, Rogozin participated with his homeland. Democracy is obvious. It doesn’t matter how they vote, the main thing is how to count. and it turns out that he is taller than everyone else - clear-faced. but democracy is such a subtle thing. There was a column against everyone, and when they calculated that there were a lot of people against everyone, they removed it completely, out of harm’s way. There’s no point in leading people into temptation, suddenly everyone will vote against everyone, but what about the president and deputies? where will they go? to work by the sweat of their brow, they forgot how to do it, and some didn’t know how at all. So the clownery with elections needs to end, why waste money, which, as the well-known gentleman said, there is none. When the people get wind of this whole topic, they simply won’t go to another clown show. Then let's see who will appear in their place.

[Mityasha]

No, it’s just that, as usual, no one will go to the polls out of despair. And the vast majority are like that!

[maiman61]

And we have to go to the elections! Otherwise, your voice will be stolen by swindlers, they have learned this well over several decades!

[fiberboard]

And what difference does it make whether you go or not, they will steal it anyway. This is the usual window dressing for other countries.

[DED_peer_DED]

Quote: maiman61

And we have to go to the elections! Otherwise, your voice will be stolen by swindlers, they have learned this well over several decades!

Oh, of course! Here, for example, is how they can steal votes, even live (crazy hackers...):

[demo]

You should be more careful with epithets.
The conversation is about voting on amendments.
If the people do not accept “such amendments,” then they do not perceive this “great sitting on the throne.”
This means that those who today are not confident in their abilities will have hope, an incentive, in the end.
And you shouldn’t drag Navalny in overnight.
There are people. There are programs.
There are still two years until the elections.
Do not doubt. They will appear.

[Vladislav_2]

rest Volodya, you’re not saving your strength at all, you’re always thinking about the PEOPLE!

[zontov79]

“At the same time, Putin added that he has not yet made a final decision for himself,” well, that’s what we understood))

[Vadim237]

We just have to wait until 2024 - it will be clear there won’t be any left.

[iouris]

"And the battle continues again,
And my heart feels anxious in my chest..."

[Mihail55]

Everything has already been decided. We are extras in the game of the powers that be...

[Mityasha]

Quote: flicker

people what kind of pension reform was? No, of course .. but they accepted her ..

1941, what kind of war was the people? No, of course ... but it has begun.

stupid comparison, simply idiotic, kochmar!

[Snail N9]

Putin did not rule out the possibility of nominating for a new term

Yah? Well, it’s necessary.... What an “unexpected” decision.... And who could have thought, who could have thought...

[Polente the Wanderer]

It’s hard to part with power, especially when the heir is not male, like Lukashenko’s. Should Medvedev have been kept in power for so many years as a likely successor, or did he simply occupy a good position temporarily and then give in without any pressure? How did Yeltsin spot a worthy one among millions of managers? There is training for the civil service - Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of July 23, 1997 No. 774 “On the training of management personnel for organizations of the national economy of the Russian Federation.” Why spend the state money on it if there are no worthy ones.
Our country has its own path of development, those in power (this is not one person) will not give up their place voluntarily (Yeltsin is an exception, and maybe they also persistently suggested choosing one of two paths).

[ZVS]

Why doesn't it exclude it? He knew perfectly well a year ago that he would be elected for a fifth term. They blindsided the electorate with amendments to the Constitution and reset the deadlines.
If Putin leaves the post of president, there will be a mandatory audit of the economic activities of his KGB friends in government agencies and state-owned companies. And the nationalization of the largest companies is possible, and, accordingly, the depreciation of the shares of these companies among “private investors” from Putin’s entourage (I cannot rule out the possibility of Putin himself)..
I am absolutely sure that those who have not made the richest country one of the world's economic leaders in 20 years will not do so in the next 10 years.

[your1970]

Quote: SU

And the nationalization of the largest companies is possible, and accordingly depreciation of shares these companies are owned by “private investors” from Putin’s entourage (I cannot exclude the possibility that they are owned by Putin himself)..

-that is, you understand that there will be a collapse in the shares of the main Russian companies - which will be quietly bought by ... well, for example, “partners” ... great for the Russian Federation, what’s up...
But even if this does not happen, the state will automatically lose a lot of money because of this

[demo]

The company does not issue shares. The company produces goods.
It costs money.
Shares are a financial and legal document giving the right to receive dividends upon successful profitable activity of the enterprise.
If the company does not make a profit, then shareholders do not receive dividends.
Here's a look at how many dividends the shareholders of the Security Council of the Russian Federation received.
Although they didn’t produce a penny’s worth of goods.
And how many dividends did Rosneft shareholders receive, compared to the amount of goods sold for?
If you stop paying dividends to the shareholders of SB or Rosneft, will they go bankrupt?

[your1970]

Quote: demo

Here's a look at how many dividends the shareholders of the Security Council of the Russian Federation received.
Although they didn’t produce a penny’s worth of goods.

-actually, they provided banking services... and not for a penny...

[surok1]

Leading can be physically difficult if one is tired. And if he gets tired, we will see it.

[Antonio_Mariarti]

It will be a very difficult 4 years, especially when almost all young people from 20-30 are against Putin and are preparing to go to a rally. And even older, eh, and before he supported and defended him, but he was very disappointed... he matured.

[Incvizitor]

I’m thinking: they won’t vote for these amendments to the constitution, the local liberda will whine: oh, what a bad GDP he faked specifically so that he could cut down forests and so that his oligarch friends would take real estate over the hill

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Incvizitor

what kind of bad gdp was faked specifically to cut down forests

And the amendments say that men should not cut down the forest? Or a ban on real estate over the hill? Did I oversleep something?

[Fishery]

drink, steal and swing))))))

[Alexander Mironovsky]

But who actually doubted it and why the farce was started...

[DEVIL LIFE'S]

“Running” is his choice. You just don’t need to interfere with others running for office. And I wish the people to choose a worthy one.

[fiberboard]

Unexpectedly, I didn’t seem to want to. It’s a small matter, an amendment needs to be made: the current president’s powers will be terminated and he will be removed from the Kremlin feet first. One of them should be included in the Constitution. But there’s really no need to shoot at parliament now; after all, there are only accomplices left there.

[Pavel73]

I am against "nullification". And not because Putin is a bad president, but precisely because he is a good president. And a good president does not have the right to be the only possible one. He is obliged to create a team of professionals in which there is a person, and more than one, capable of being the leader of the state. And I do not want a repetition of the events at the end of the USSR. When on a gun carriage and with scarlet pads. Let him live a normal human life on a normal human pension.

[Million]

His time is long over. If he had left in time, maybe he would have left a good memory of himself in history

[member]

from his work for the good of his homeland, it shines like from welding in the anus area, where the partners applied an electrode...minus the fuck..

[Horn]

Hello! I specifically registered on the site to write this comment under this article. The Russian Constitution should not have restrictions on the number of presidential terms for one candidate for the following reasons: 1. This contradicts the free elections of the country's president. If elections exist, then citizens have the right to decide who will be elected and when. If there are no free elections, then worrying about how many terms the constitution provides for one candidate is a waste of time; it is better to worry about why there are no free elections. 2. Suddenly a situation arises in which the best option would be a candidate who already has two presidential terms behind him. What to do then? Out of principle, choose the one who is worse? 3. The more a person works in one place, the better he is as a specialist.

[demo]

Have you ever wondered why in the same USA there are two terms and not a day more?
Despite the fact that their Congress and Senate are not our amorphous State Duma and Federation Council.
And they have a lot of power and responsibility to their voters is also quite a lot.

The fact is that anyone, I emphasize, ANY ambitious person, and the highest government position, to which a person is elected by popular vote, is the limit of ambition.
Only God is higher.
But they are not elected to this position.

Being in power, such as the head of our state has, a person quickly “loses his shores.”
And if he had been brought to this position by his like-minded people, party members, with clearly present high human qualities, that would have been one thing.
But when a person worked in a secondary role for one of the destroyers of our state - Sobchak. When he has a trail of unproven malfeasance trailing behind him (the Sollier commission), when he was simply dragged “to the top” for inspection. And drunkenness confirmed him.
After all, EBN is a complete collapse of the state and the individual.
Against this backdrop, the people really liked the lively guy who came.
And he pacified Chechnya (he filled it with money and allowed permissiveness).
And finished with terrorism.
And it began to slightly improve the general well-being of people.
But this is due to the fact that oil and gas were in price.
And the oil and gas kings, who were guzzling down their throats, threw leftovers from the “master’s table” to the people.
And the people “didn’t bark.”
And then one crisis, another, mistakes in management, mistakes in personnel policy (it’s good if there are mistakes, but what if it’s all intentional?).
Now is the time to think about it.
Why do our people and our country need such a specific head?
And today there is another crisis - a virus, take it to a certain place.
And what about the head of state?
He hid in a bunker and holds meetings every day.
And his counterparts, that is, ministers and heads of agencies and services, talk such crap that even his nerves could not stand it.
Those. the complete incapacity of either the head of state or the government appointed by him is shown online.
I was deeply outraged by the fact that the authorities require the population to enter public places wearing masks and gloves, but at the same time the price of these products in pharmacies instantly increased by 5-10 times.
Take Turkey as an example: the requirements are the same, but these products are not on sale! They are provided to everyone for FREE!
Why do we need such power?

[Horn]

Why in the USA there are 2 terms and no more thought. Apparently because our constitution was written by Americans. I believe that lawmaking is the tool by which the country is governed. The law must be written in such a way as to meet the interests of the people. Namely: it is in the interests of the people to have the power to elect the head of state every 6 years, it is in the interests of the people to elect the same candidate an unlimited number of times if he (the candidate) meets their (the people’s) interests, it is in the interests of the people not to elect a candidate at all who does not meets the interests of the majority and is running only because the previous head of state has expired. The question is not how long a person has been in power, but what exactly is happening at the moment. What is the best option for everyone, taking into account all the circumstances. The main thing is that anyone can always nominate themselves for the post of president, and citizens can always elect whoever they see fit through an honest vote. And there should be no restrictions on people exercising their power. If we don’t have fair elections, then we need to solve this real problem. Agree, there is no point in restrictions if there are no fair elections. And if there are fair elections, then what is the point of restrictions?

[demo]

Namely: it is in the interests of the people to have the power to elect the head of state every 6 years, it is in the interests of the people to elect the same candidate an unlimited number of times if he (the candidate) meets their (the people’s) interests, it is in the interests of the people not to elect a candidate at all who does not meets the interests of the majority and is running only because the previous head of state has expired. The question is not how long a person has been in power, but what exactly is happening at the moment.

People's interest - what is it?
Stealing public property into private pockets?
Selling national wealth to those who, body and soul, are outside the Russian Federation?
Pass more and more draconian laws against the well-being of the many?
At the same time, we must convince everyone that this is the situation in the world, and we simply have nowhere to go!
This is not politics, this is pure hypocrisy.
Convince the slave that from tomorrow they will stop giving him porridge, and will only leave him bread and water, due to the fact that the overseers cannot, with the same feeding, get their next billion?

The state's concern for people lies in something else.
It is logical to assume that the well-being of the majority is more preferable for the state than the fattening of the minority.

My point of view: a person should NOT be in power for more than two terms AT ALL.
If we take our period of 6 years. then a total of 12 years is enough for a person to give his all, like a galley slave, and leave with dignity.
If there is no dignity in leaving, then leave anyway.
There are too many temptations. And the person is too weak.
From rags to riches - this is the Russian assessment of what happens to someone who has achieved power without internal inhibitions.

When a person, the head of a state, publicly and publicly gives instructions to his government, but the ministers accountable and controlled by him don’t do a damn thing (presidential messages and decrees), then the question arises - what’s the matter?
The answer is on the surface - a failure in personnel policy when selecting ministers and the head’s inability to understand people (if we talk about the fact that a person in his place cares for the state).
And if, for example, since 2014 the problem of providing Crimea with water has not been resolved, then the head of Crimea Aksenov and the Minister of Natural Resources and Ecology of Crimea Naraev should be kicked out of work (they are not people’s deputies, they are appointees).
And those who sit above them should also be forced to sweep the streets, instead of the Tajiks.
But he neither kicked me out nor fired me.
And they are playing a broken record - oh, what a Ukraine, they blocked the channel.
Is that how they work?
If only Putin could turn off the water for a month so that it would happen to him?
And here we’ve been stomping around for six years without any results!
Were sanctions imposed for trying to give people normal water?

This is the main question - is the head of state so concerned about people?
If this is caring, then what is neglect of VITAL important needs.

In short.
Not only does he not last, but he also wants to stay too long.
Like that guest who was not invited, but he stuck in, and after being let in, he refuses to leave.

[Incvizitor]

Have you ever wondered why in the same USA there are two terms and not a day more?

Maybe because the president doesn’t decide anything there, he might as well not exist at all.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Gorn

Suddenly a situation arises in which the best option would be a candidate who already has two presidential terms behind him. What to do then?

But a truly real leader always has the opportunity to lead the party and influence decisions from the State Duma. Contact Boris in the helmet, he will explain everything to you in a simple manner.

[Serg72]

Well, let’s put it this way - he didn’t “raise” or “allow” COMPETITORS. ok, I understand... But he could have raised (selected) ASSISTANTS, GOVERNORS (already directly appointed and removed under our “democracy” for 20 YEARS? NO? He just indicated that the money should be paid - ZERO, is this sabotage, I don’t think so... It’s just the impotence of everyone appointed by him.... it’s rather weak, for such a credit of trust and vertical (and for how long?) - a bit thin...

[adler87]

But I always supported him, until I was 18. Now no way. This is not my president.

[datur]

Well, let's say I vote for PUTIN!!!!! Because I don’t see another ruler!!!!!!

[samurai_klim]

For the Emperor
I'll go vote for him
Just like my friends

[Sether]

You and all your friends are just Putirasts

[veritas]

Putin did not rule out the possibility of nominating for a new term

And someone doubted it. For this reason, the Constitution is being changed.

[Sklendarka]

Quote: lexus

To be honest, I love watching you hysterically, Lexus.

Are these your “scientific achievements”? Not surprised. There is no hysteria and there never was, but you can definitely count on the “Darwin Award”, to sum it up.

I'm moving on.

Where “Kozma Prutkov” called to “see”. AND

Keep barking

How much you want.

But I like K. Prutkov’s story about the drummer better...

[alexey1213]

Apparently he himself believed that we could not replace him. Old age doesn’t look good on anyone. He doesn’t even want to prepare a successor for himself, he’s afraid.

[Pechkin]

What a twist, who would have thought.

[Freedom in 0]

I liked the beginning of the article.
Because if you think about it, the shooting of unarmed deputies from tanks is the only war that the current ruling system in the Russian Federation has actually won. Everything else is nothing.
Well, the winner robs the loser.
Everything is really as usual. No surprises or misunderstandings.
For those who have difficulty with CY, don’t read.

[Dr. Frankenstucker]

Expected. Uncle Pu didn’t even make a tactful pause before making such a statement - why the hell should he stand on ceremony with obedient butts? They're being grabbed by suckers. There, in the branch, children with washed brains are practicing smoking incense to a bronzed idol. “I’ll go vote only for him!!!” - cretins, he put his bronze bolt on your voices.

[Serg72]

Well, about the doctors - do you know how much the doctors lost (I repeat - LOST) in salaries??? The medical supervision pays the “reds”, and the rest were not just cut,,,,They dumped all the remaining ones on them (including those with corona, but try to blather - for quarantine.... and such a quarantine, without corona, quietly) And you know what REASONS are needed for you to have an official. take a swab?......This is not the main thing, these are the CONSEQUENCES of personnel policy....I ask myself the question - is it still needed? THEN we will think about who and how (within the framework of common sense) Of course - it will remain! My forecast is 67%) You know why, it’s just that in one election (there is such an area) the United Russia party was ORDERED to make two-thirds, well, they typed it on a calculator........They poke at the calculator, and people - to live. ....20 years !!!! During this time, Bismarck made the ENTIRE history of ALL Europe for the next TWO centuries (and he studied with Prince Gorchakov)...
what am I getting at - I don’t know, Nice, but morally (technologically) - outdated.... Although our mechanisms contain a lot of things, incl. and a second youth.... Vovka, think for yourself... but 1905 was under exactly the same conditions......

[Chess knight]

Let's goodbye

[colotun]

Personally, I vote for resetting all of Putin's terms.
They don’t change horses midway!
We really need Putin = president and his entire team in our successful Russian future!
Empire above all!

[Vadim237]

We must admit that there is no such significant, revered and respected politician on the world stage and within the country as Vladimir Putin anywhere, and I doubt that Russia will have one like him after he leaves power.

[Pilat2009]

Quote: Vadim237

such a significant, respected and respected politician

So respected that the country is under sanctions. Would you try to impose sanctions on Joseph Vissarionich?

[Vadim237]

For Joseph Vissarionich, not only were sanctions imposed, but a whole iron fence was erected - a curtain was erected. You somehow forgot about this historical aspect.

[Pilat2009]

Quote: Vadim237

For Joseph Vissarionich, not only were sanctions imposed, but a whole iron fence was erected - a curtain was erected. You somehow forgot about this historical aspect.

Do not confuse Joseph Vissarionovich with Leonid Ilyich. And Stalin built a self-sufficient economy

[Oleg Skvortsov]

Boris, how long has it been since you rode a horse? What kind of empire is this? Be less interested in TV series

[colotun]

Obviously the starling is not an eagle = flies low

[Brigadier]

"Putin did not rule out the possibility of nominating for a new term"

Who would doubt that...
After all, this is exactly why these “amendments” to the Constitution were made so quickly!
And we all know very well what the most important “amendment” is for Putin...

[ApJlekuHo]

Quote: Tugarin

Quote: Shurik70

But this "zeroing" disappointed me in him. Too frank mockery of the law

And what? Why the hell is this baby talk here?

[Whirlwind]

Hulks, you will get to 2024, and then choose...
TODAY the people are given a historic chance to change their destiny by taking part in the NATIONAL vote! The question of introducing amendments was on the ballot on April 22, but due to the pandemic, the referendum did not take place and President Putin postponed it to July 1. As for the amendments, they have already been approved by the regions and ADOPTED by the Duma and the Federal Assembly. BUT, these amendments will only work if the people vote to CHANGE the current, inherently colonial Constitution, to a nationally oriented, sovereign Constitution. Those. will correct its fatal mistake of 1993, when the ENTIRE NATION accepted the actual surrender to the USA and NATO, after the defeat of the USSR in the twentieth century 1945 - 1991, by voting for the Yeltsin Constitution. That is why on the ballot for the referendum on July 1 there will be a question - “Do you approve of CHANGES to the Constitution of the Russian Federation?” “YES” is a difficult but peaceful path to freedom and sovereignty of the country. “No” is a bloody war for sovereignty and freedom with the USA, NATO, plus their six former...
As the Commander-in-Chief of the RF Armed Forces, President Putin, said, “Russia was and will be sovereign, otherwise it will not exist, and we don’t need a World without Russia!”
Russia and its people are at a fateful fork in the road!
Where July 1 2020 let's turn it around and we'll get it...

[Dmitry Vladimirovich]

Quote: Whirlwind

As the Commander-in-Chief of the RF Armed Forces, President Putin, said, “Russia was and will be sovereign, otherwise it will not exist, and we don’t need a World without Russia!”

Yes, you are tired of the broadcasters of the Zapupin sect.
Your Putin is a brake on Russia's development. Under him, only the security forces live well - at the expense of everyone who works.

[Pilat2009]

Quote: Dmitry Vladimirovich

at the expense of everyone who works.

Moreover, they do not produce any GDP

[Vadim237]

Moreover, there will be no development with your brakes.

[Pilat2009]

Quote: Whirlwind

Wherever we turn on July 1, 2020, that’s what we’ll get.

Well, how is it different from the 1993 constitution? What, is the central bank being removed from external control? There are no fundamental differences in the amendments - so, in small ways they threw a bone to the people

[demo]

Eugene. Have you ever fallen from a great height?
Well, so that your head hits something hard?
If they fell, then your comment is understandable.
But if you haven’t fallen, then here are some questions for you.
What is a colony?
If you don't know, I'll answer.
A country forcibly captured and exploited by an imperialist state (the metropolis), deprived of state independence.
What is written that does not correspond to the situation?
What answer?
Are we captured?
Do we have a metropolis?
Are we deprived of statehood?
But the answers are not exactly what they are supposed to be.
The dependence of our country on the mother country (the USA and the dollar) will not go away by changing the internal document (the Constitution).
Even if a completely new Constitution is adopted, with 100% changes in all articles, the exploitation of our country (that is, our people) will not stop.
I think there are no objections?
And the last.
If the Russian Federation had a real President (and not, as it is today, a president), then no one would impose sanctions on Mondays.
It was possible to find 1001 ways to answer in such a way that most people would lose their desire.

[ApJlekuHo]

"Do you approve of CHANGES to the Constitution of the Russian Federation?" “YES” is a difficult but peaceful path to freedom and sovereignty of the country. “No” is a bloody war for sovereignty and freedom with the USA, NATO, plus their six former...

Everything was decided a long time ago, without your rural pun. There will be amendments to Putin.

[1536]

The main thing has not been done: the country still depends on the change of president, on external pressure, even on the antics of irresponsible people and outright fools. But this shouldn’t happen. Russia must be a powerful country with a united people and indivisible territory. Therefore, let him finish what he started, if he has the strength and calms down.

[Oleg Skvortsov]

Evgeniy, by the way, you are one of those people who are led in formation to throw ballots into the ballot box. Don’t bother thinking - we do what we were ordered to do

[Dmitry Vladimirovich]

I never thought that we would lag behind China so quickly.

Eternal President - you will start listening to rappers
[

[Marina Soboleva]

I'm proud of my president! V.V. Putin will go down in Russian history as the great president of the country! Thanks to him !

[gridasov]

And he does the right thing! And anyone who illegally interferes will be destroyed. The lion is not a rabbit's friend!

[flicker]

Dancing with a tambourine performed by the anti-Putin hundred at VO.

[flicker]

It’s not possible to insert a comment, this is the 20th time I’ve tried.
Putin just didn’t rule out the possibility, but the imported immigrants have already started having diarrhea

[Pilat2009]

Let's say goodbye already!