Military Review

The three most important Russian military technologies of recent years

104

The development of military technology does not stand still. We regularly learn about the appearance of new types of weapons and additional capabilities of military equipment. We can distinguish the 3 most significant military technologies of recent years.


Noise reduction technology in submarines


For a long time, engineers struggled to reduce the noise of submarines, which would significantly increase their invisibility to the enemy and, consequently, combat effectiveness.

Russia is the leader in the development of submarine noise suppression technologies, and this position was taken by our country in Soviet times. The least noisy of the nuclear submarines are the nuclear submarines of project 955 Borey, which “make noise” by only 108 decibels. The submarine is armed with Bulava intercontinental ballistic missiles.

Applied noise suppression technologies allow nuclear submarines of project 955 Borey to remain practically invisible to foreign fleets. So, when in 2015 the atomic submarine rocket carrier Alexander Nevsky made the transition from the North fleet to the Pacific, American ships were never able to track it. The submarine managed to quietly follow even through the Bering Strait, passing along the coast of the United States.

Hypersonic Weapon Technologies


Over creating hypersonic weapons Now they work not only in Russia, but also in the United States. But so far, only Russia, according to President Vladimir Putin, is the only country in the world that has hypersonic weapons. The most talked about in the media and at the same time classified project in this area is 3M22 Zircon hypersonic missiles.

The importance of this weapon is evidenced by the fact that for the first time its technical characteristics were personally announced by Russian President Vladimir Putin. He stated that the flight speed of the ammunition will be 9 Machs, and the range of action is 1 thousand km.

With Zircon hypersonic missiles, Russia plans to arm the surface and submarine fleets, including multipurpose nuclear submarines, frigates and corvettes, and large anti-submarine ships. It is possible that in addition to the marine version, Russia will also develop a land version of Zircons. At least, the US INF Treaty gap eliminated formal obstacles to the implementation of these developments in Russia.

So far, information about Zircon is fragmentary. The military department keeps secret more detailed information about a hypersonic missile. But it can be assumed that the air defense and missile defense systems of a potential enemy may be helpless against the latest Russian weapons.


At the end of 2019, he took up combat duty and the Avangard hypersonic missile system, equipped with an intercontinental ballistic missile.

This system differs from existing types of military equipment with the ability to fly in dense layers of the atmosphere to an intercontinental range at a hypersonic speed exceeding the Mach number by more than 20 times,

- President Vladimir Putin spoke about Avangard.

The Chinese publication Zhongguo Junjun calls Zircon and Vanguard the main trump cards of modern Russia in their confrontation with the United States. According to Chinese analysts, Russia is significantly ahead of the United States in the field of technology of hypersonic weapons and now the Americans have to catch up with Moscow.

Electronic warfare technologies


In modern armed conflicts, the role and importance of electronic warfare systems (electronic warfare) are significantly increased. For example, how else to deal with the tactics of massive attack by unmanned aerial vehicles that has found widespread use in Syria and Libya?


In recent years, Russia has been actively developing new technologies that can significantly upgrade the electronic warfare equipment that is in service with the Russian army. For example, the mobile complexes of the Krasukha family are capable of suppressing the airborne radar systems of aircraft, helicopters, and unmanned aerial vehicles of the enemy at a distance of up to 400 km.

The latest Divnomorye-U complex is capable of fulfilling tasks both in suppressing the radar systems of enemy aircraft and in conducting electronic reconnaissance in airspace, which also makes it indispensable in modern conditions.

Russian EW systems are also very effective against enemy armored vehicles. This conclusion, for example, was made by the commander of the 11th armored cavalry regiment of the American army, Colonel Scott Woodward, based on tests at the US National Training Center at Fort Irwin. It turned out that despite careful camouflage, American armored vehicles left a bright radio-electronic trail that would be easily detected by Russian electronic warfare equipment with subsequent suppression of communication channels.

Of course, the range of significant military technologies developed in Russia recently and successfully implemented in practice is much wider.
Author:
Photos used:
Wikipedia
104 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Tatyana
    Tatyana 4 June 2020 11: 24 New
    12
    the range of significant military technologies developed in Russia recently and successfully implemented in practice is much wider.
    This makes me happy.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 4 June 2020 11: 29 New
      14
      This is all for war. There is not much joy in this, but otherwise it does not work out so far.
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 4 June 2020 11: 36 New
        +1
        Quote: rocket757
        This is all for war. There is not much joy in this, but otherwise it does not work out so far.

        Hedgehog understands that the situation in the world is such that war is on the nose!
        And the increase in Russia's defense capability cannot but please the Russians, for whom the Motherland is one - the Russian Federation. Without any overseas rookeries there.
        1. Antonio_Mariarti
          Antonio_Mariarti 4 June 2020 12: 36 New
          +9
          Oh, under the USSR, it was possible to understand and people could hammer it, but people want to live here and now and live in comfort. Therefore, the war no longer interests anyone, but especially the youth.
          1. shahor
            shahor 4 June 2020 15: 03 New
            0
            Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
            Therefore, the war no longer interests anyone, but especially the youth.

            Yes, youth missed! Already does not want to fight! Have come ...
            1. military_cat
              military_cat 4 June 2020 17: 32 New
              0
              I wonder why the electronic warfare systems were not used against Turkish drones. It would seem that this is where it is, the most obvious application ...
              1. Grits
                Grits 7 June 2020 01: 39 New
                +3
                Quote: military_cat
                I wonder why the electronic warfare systems were not used against Turkish drones. It would seem that this is where it is, the most obvious application ...

                Because these systems, apparently, work fine only on the pages of print media and on the Internet on similar articles.
                In their combat use, they are similar to the S-300/400. - never participated in them. Such a super-duper, only planes still bomb the ally's objects.
              2. Arnaut
                Arnaut 8 June 2020 16: 10 New
                +3
                In Libya, the Earth is round, and at the landfill in the Russian Federation - flat.
                This is vile and used by the Janissaries.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. Fuse angel
              Fuse angel 4 June 2020 21: 19 New
              +2
              Yes, youth missed! Already does not want to fight! Have come ..


              Generalize is not necessary. Only d. Urak wants to fight! Because war is death and destruction, there is nothing good in it. But I’m 24, I have served and love my homeland, if necessary, I’ll go to defend it. In addition, I have a couple of friends who are just as patriotic.
              1. shahor
                shahor 5 June 2020 13: 39 New
                +1
                Quote: Guardian Angel
                In addition, I have a couple of friends who are just as patriotic.

                A couple of patriotic friends? Is that all? This is a catastrophe! Urgently make new patriotic friends! There are a lot of them on this site! I-beat the enemies!
              2. sanja.grw
                sanja.grw 6 June 2020 10: 15 New
                +1
                But I'm 24, I have served and love my homeland,

                Sorry, correct, Motherland is written with a capital letter
          2. snake
            snake 4 June 2020 15: 08 New
            -2
            Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
            Oh, under the USSR it was possible to understand and people could hammer it, but people want to live here and now and live in comfort.

            Alas and ah ... They want, you know, comfort ... What kind of people went ..? Unconscious ... They want to live ...
            Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
            the war no longer interests anyone, but especially the youth.

            Sadness is trouble ... But as William Shakespeare wrote:
            "Yes, and I will say: war is better than peace, like day is better than night. During war, you live merrily: now you have a new rumor, then new news."
            Not that youth went, not that ...
            But seriously: if you say -
            Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
            war no longer interests anyone

            that means there will be no war, and this is good, are you our Napoleon sofa?
            1. Antonio_Mariarti
              Antonio_Mariarti 5 June 2020 08: 06 New
              +1
              There will always be wars, man is a very aggressive creature.
              1. snake
                snake 5 June 2020 12: 21 New
                -2
                War is a continuation of politics. Consequently, wars initiate ambitious politicians, and human aggression is the tenth thing. There are plenty of means to channel and direct human aggression, in addition to war.
                Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
                man is a very aggressive creature

                Not really. If there were "very", then how would society exist at all? Everyone would have fought to the death among themselves. There is youthful maximalism in your words.
        2. Pilat2009
          Pilat2009 4 June 2020 13: 19 New
          -4
          Quote: Tatiana
          Quote: rocket757
          This is all for war. There is not much joy in this, but otherwise it does not work out so far.

          Hedgehog understands that the situation in the world is such that war is on the nose!
          And the increase in Russia's defense capability cannot but please the Russians, for whom the Motherland is one - the Russian Federation. Without any overseas rookeries there.

          You’ve had a war on the nose since 1945. Since then, millions of units of arms have been plundered, armed half the world for free, and as a result the union has rested, and Russia is being stifled with sanctions. And no war is needed. Well, the Chinese are stubborn, and pressed with a fingernail trade war
          1. Ded_Mazay
            Ded_Mazay 4 June 2020 13: 59 New
            +4
            Quote: Pilat2009
            so what the Chinese are stubborn, and they were pressed to the nail with a trade war

            In what place? In Trump's winning streak?
      2. Mitroha
        Mitroha 4 June 2020 12: 03 New
        17
        Quote: rocket757
        This is all for war. There is not much joy in this, but otherwise it does not work out so far.

        Look from the other side.
        This is all for the world.
        For while we have such weapons and one of the best armies, with a great deal of probability there will be peace on our land. hi
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 4 June 2020 12: 10 New
          +8
          Quote: Mitroha
          Look from the other side.

          we have to look from different sides ... "we are peaceful people, but just one armored train, on the side tracks, is now impossible to do"!
          May peace come on earth.
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 4 June 2020 12: 50 New
            +2
            Quote: Mitroha
            This is all for the world. For while we have such weapons and one of the best armies, with a great deal of probability there will be peace on our land.

            You said it right!
            For, as they say, "If you want peace, prepare for war!"



            “If you want peace, prepare for war” is a Latin winged expression, the authorship of which is attributed to the Roman historian Cornelius Nepot.
            1. Antonio_Mariarti
              Antonio_Mariarti 5 June 2020 08: 09 New
              0
              The USSR was ready for war better than NATO, but this did not save him from collapse.
              1. Tatyana
                Tatyana 5 June 2020 12: 13 New
                -1
                Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
                The USSR was ready for war better than NATO, but this did not save him from collapse.

                Do you know how such things are done? Or do you not remember what happened to the USSR Armed Forces under Gorbachev? How exactly under Gorbachev did the Soviet Armed Forces collapse "from above" and unilaterally disarmed the USSR in front of the United States and the "collective West"?

                Gorbachev - an ordinary American agent • Jul 13. 2013 year


                Andrei Fursov - Perestroika - How the USSR was Dismantled. • Jun 18. 2016 year
                1. Antonio_Mariarti
                  Antonio_Mariarti 6 June 2020 12: 27 New
                  -4
                  M. Gorbachev did not destroy the USSR. By the beginning of the 1990s, the Soviet Union turned out to be. in an acute economic crisis, which quickly escalated into a system crisis. It could not be otherwise, taking into account the artificial formation of the Union itself from the wreckage of the collapsed empire, the construction of a strange economic system for planning supply and demand without any connection between them and the formation of a political system that could only be supported by bayonets, fear and deception. This system deceived itself: a myth about a pure source - the Leninist period, allegedly later clouded by Stalin - was built into its short history. The sixties, whose moods and aspirations were expressed by Gorbachev, believed that if you return to socialism with a "human face", cleanse it of Stalinist layers, you will get a correct and successful country. When these layers began to be removed one after another, it quickly became clear that there was simply no socialism, that everything was based on bayonets and fear. As soon as it became clear that Gorbachev would not use force to overcome the crisis, then everything fell apart. He faced such a tsunami of political and economic problems, which he could have overcome, but time was slipping away catastrophically. Gorbachev desperately tried to save the USSR, found a certain formula of agreement with the emerging national elites on a new form of building and managing the Union, but the actions of the pseudo-patriotic GKChP overnight tore up this formula and put an end to the entire system. Only members of the State Emergency Committee are to blame for the collapse of the USSR.
                  1. Tatyana
                    Tatyana 6 June 2020 13: 36 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
                    M. Gorbachev did not ruin the USSR.
                    According to this one of your statements, even at first I doubted that you were a citizen of the Russian Federation. I even went to your profile and read your comments.
                    And then another question arose. How old were you under Gorbachev and in the early 1990s that you deny Gorbachev's guilt in the collapse of the USSR?
                    You then, probably, still at school in elementary grades studied that you do not remember anything.
                    This is no offense to me I said. I just would like to understand how you got such false ideas about Gorbachev and why and who inspired you to do so.
                    1. Antonio_Mariarti
                      Antonio_Mariarti 6 June 2020 14: 50 New
                      -1
                      No, I did not live in those days, I was born at the end of 90. But this does not bother me from judging those times. Once again, Gorbachev did not destroy the USSR, and here's why:

                      It was not the USSR that was destroyed, but the communist system, on which the national-state formation in the form of the USSR rested.

                      Communism ruined the economy. The model built over the years of the communist dictatorship was not viable - it is impossible to plan the production of everything and everything, in pieces, tons, centners or rubles. The economy rests on value, free prices, competition and private property. The communist model did not allow any of this. It was all focused on the production of weapons, heavy industry goods and, last but not least, for which there are funds and forces, goods for the population. There was always little left. Therefore, the deficit was chronic: people could never dress properly, put on shoes, live in decent conditions, comfortably. All was missing: hats, coats, socks, wallpaper, paint, furniture, chandeliers, toothbrushes, condoms, toilet paper, televisions, pots.

                      The average housing supply is 4-5 m2 per person. (in the "rotten" since 1917 Europe - 18-20 m2).

                      But the main thing that was missing and what made life constantly disturbing and unstable was food. People lived half-starving: bread, potatoes, herring, pasta. There were few vegetables, almost no fruits. Abkhazian tangerines are a rarity.

                      The big problem is the quality of everything that was produced. In the absence of competition, quality was poor. Machines, mechanisms, devices, locks, planes, ships, lamps often broke, their shelf life was short-lived, the consumption of resources per unit of output was many times higher than in Europe or, especially, in the USA.

                      A planned economy is not able to plan fundamentally new goods and products based on scientific and technological progress. After all, all these new products are increasingly associated with an increase in the individualism of the consumer — man, and communism was against individualism, against the individual. These are incompatible systems - man and communism. A man needs freedom, self-expression, comfort, security. Communism condemned all this as unacceptable "bourgeois" excesses. Communism bluntly declared struggle for all these excesses. In these conditions, how could a planned economy plan the appearance of VCRs, photocopiers, the Internet, and mobile phones? Chewing gum - a subject for children from the fairy tale area.

                      All growing, prosperous and sustainable economies are open economies included in world trade and the international system of division of labor. The communist system is closed. She has no incentive for growth and development.

                      The communist system rested on fear and limited needs of the population. As fear began to dissipate in the 1960s, people's needs began to increase. The economy could not cover them. For some time propaganda managed to assure that happiness and prosperity were near, but not for long.

                      Colossal imbalances have been accumulating in the Soviet communist system for decades. They appeared after the Civil War, when the system was saved by the return to capitalism in the form of the NEP. The militarization of the economy before the war and the war itself alienated the normalization of economic life and blurred imbalances, but after the war they began to form with renewed vigor. Since the 1960s, when the economy grew at 10% per year in the wake of the post-Stalin enthusiasm of the new, young generation, the pace began to decline, and with the oil crisis of the early 1980s. generally went negative.

                      This economy has never had growth points. She could not exist.

                      Gorbachev was not lucky - he had to deal with the crisis, the scale and depth of which no one in the country understood. Statistics distorted the real situation. It was a world of crooked mirrors. But Gorbachev made titanic efforts to save communism by combining it with the beginnings of private initiative, and with it the Soviet Union. But the crisis was growing rapidly, turning into a tsunami, which is all bold.

                      But there were 2 specific mechanisms for breaking the USSR in those conditions:

                      1) In a crisis, everyone formed a mood that they feed others, that if you get rid of your neighbors, then life will get better. Such sentiments appeared in all republics, and within them - by regions. But the republican borders turned out to be the weakest under these conditions. A split went along them. Understanding this, Gorbachev quite rightly went to reformat relations between the republics so that by sharing with the local elites the power they sought to maintain a common economic mechanism. It almost happened. The Novo-Ogaryov agreement was ready for signing.

                      2) But such a model of a new state system meant limiting the powers of the Center and removing or replacing very specific individuals. These people, having the technical ability to eavesdrop on the head of state, decided to replay the situation. Emerged GKChP, which lasted, however, a full 2 ​​days. The failure of this putsch caused powerful centrifugal forces: frightened by the dope of Moscow, the republics rushed to defend themselves for the future and actually separated. They stopped transferring money to the federal budget. Russia fed the Center a couple of months, but then abandoned this venture.

                      In Belovezhskaya Pushcha issued a death certificate.

                      Russia suffered the least from the collapse of the USSR - almost all mineral resources, the bulk of the industrial potential, and the gigantic territory were and remain on its territory.
                      1. Tatyana
                        Tatyana 6 June 2020 15: 03 New
                        -1
                        Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
                        I was born at the end of 90.
                        To be honest, that’s exactly what I thought that in the late 90s, your mother drove you in a stroller. But I thought that suddenly this is still not the case, then you will be completely offended.
                        But then another question. But you are a citizen after all of which state, and where did you study and what did you graduate from? Is it really all of you modern teachers in the Russian Federation taught ?!
                        Where do you get your sources of information from?
                      2. Antonio_Mariarti
                        Antonio_Mariarti 6 June 2020 15: 54 New
                        -1
                        That is, in fact you have nothing to answer, as predicted. RF, studying in Tomsk at TSU at FPMK. It's enough. From the Internet, everything is open (except for the state archives of the Russian Federation in the USSR))) The teachers are excellent. Especially young.
                      3. Tatyana
                        Tatyana 6 June 2020 16: 24 New
                        +1
                        Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
                        That is, in fact you have nothing to answer, as predicted.
                        Why nothing? There is something, only it will explain to you for a long time.
                        By the way, the video, as I understand it, you have not watched. And you yourself refer to the Internet.
                        Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
                        RF, studying in Tomsk at TSU at FPMK. It's enough.
                        Graduate student or what? You are not a student by age after graduation. And what did you have between the school and the university?
                        After all, by the time you were 25 years old (by gradations of age-related pedagogy and psychology), you were a mature personality. And now - at your 31-year-old age - it’s hard to convince you. Only when on your forehead you fill your own cones with life, only then will something change in your worldview.
                      4. Antonio_Mariarti
                        Antonio_Mariarti 6 June 2020 17: 19 New
                        -1
                        It takes a long time to explain, you still won't understand ... Yes, yes. I was once his supporter in 2015, and then I grew up and ceased to be. Seriously, Evgeny Fedorov? This is the one who in words - we are a satellite of the United States, and he himself votes for all the laws from Edr? And justifying this by the fact that it should be so. Excellent! Excuse me, but I'm not a populist supporter. I wrote you everything on the facts. I will watch 2 videos, but I watched similar ones. There is the main argument. We had enemies in power (where did they come from?) The system worked, the country was the best (although the same example of square meters of housing speaks volumes)), and then an evil guy came and destroyed everything. Yeah. Why should China start with the same system of reforms in its economy? Also private ownership, competition? And the only thing left of "communism" in China is the name of the party and autocracy. And so a mixed economy, bourgeois and poor, and so on.
                        No, not a graduate student. No, I immediately went after school. I am 22 years old, in the 5th year. And it’s useless to change you and your generation (Yes, and why not, your time has almost passed) It is easier for you to look for enemies outside. That the bad Uncles came and ruined such a beautiful country where the sun was brighter, the flowers smelled tastier, and the ice cream was made from a real ice cream than to admit your mistakes and move on. The reasons for the collapse of the USSR wrote. If you can refute something, let's. And to get personal - that means you have nothing to say on the merits. It was not Gorbachev who was to blame for the Soviet Union, but all the citizens of the USSR.
                      5. Grits
                        Grits 7 June 2020 01: 52 New
                        +1
                        Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
                        It was not Gorbachev who was to blame for the Soviet Union, but all the citizens of the USSR.

                        Maybe. I also read Solzhenitsyn, listened to Tsoi's "We are waiting for change" and bought foreign jeans. wink
                        Although, you have written everything correctly. It is a pity that at that time we did not realize why everything was heading. It is a pity that the country's leadership did not catch on time and did not adopt the experience of China.
                        But ... you will not return anything
                      6. Antonio_Mariarti
                        Antonio_Mariarti 7 June 2020 23: 34 New
                        -2
                        What is the experience of China? There was no experience of China at that time. It was China that took the basics of Gorbachev's reforms and began to move towards a mixed economy.
                      7. Grits
                        Grits 8 June 2020 08: 05 New
                        +1
                        Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
                        What is the experience of China? There was no experience of China at that time. It was China that took the basics of Gorbachev's reforms and began to move towards a mixed economy.

                        Deng Xiaoping began the reform 10 years before the Soviet perestroika.
                  2. Tatyana
                    Tatyana 7 June 2020 05: 41 New
                    +2
                    About 4-5 years ago, I took part in the international n / a conference on sociology at St. Petersburg State University.
                    And there I remember the performance of one graduate student in sociology from another city of the Russian Federation. The topic of her dissertation was the study of various spheres of influence in different regions of Russia on the political worldview of Russian citizens in different age groups and with different backgrounds. And as a result of the study, she suddenly along the way discovered one ubiquitous feature that she cannot explain. And without explaining this feature, she cannot defend her Ph.D. thesis, since the study is not complete. Therefore, she simply asked those present for help - to give her the right answer. Namely.
                    The fact is that her study clearly showed that one “strange” pattern emerged throughout the country. That, regardless of the region of residence and education (secondary or higher), respondents in age groups under 35 think with cliches that sets them modern education and the media, and nothing new from themselves! But in age groups over 35 years old, respondents show their own critical thinking, regardless of the level of education and the influence of the media on them.
                    What's the matter? And the answer is simple. Well, I said that the whole point is the differences in the teaching system for the assimilation of knowledge. Namely.
                    All age groups over 35 managed to get a Soviet education. And what is the difference between Soviet education and post-Soviet? It differs in various teaching methods of scientific knowledge.
                    In Soviet education, emphasis was placed on a logical understanding of the system of scientific knowledge - i.e. not only for memorizing reference points of knowledge (for scientific facts), but also for comprehensive causal relationships between them. This is the principle of dialectical materialistic determinism.
                    In modern post-Soviet education, a logical understanding of the system of scientific knowledge is no longer laid, but the main emphasis is on cramming and guessing. Mathematics as the basis of formal logical knowledge is also given less and less space in the educational system.
                    As a result, we have what we have. People who are not capable and not accustomed to think logically on their own, those who have power to control - to manipulate - are much easier.
                  3. Antonio_Mariarti
                    Antonio_Mariarti 7 June 2020 23: 30 New
                    0
                    I'm a techie, I don't need to talk about logic and mathematics. Yes, the great Soviet education, powerful, so many smart and rationally thinking people released that after the collapse in 90, massively "These" rational people were charged from the TV with spiritual strength, went to sects en masse, gave their last money in mmm, recall how many channels there were, where they used to guess and help cure a person with the help of spirits, eh? And how many sects have divorced, how many people there are with the stamp "I was educated in the USSR, so I can think rationally." Yes, where are we to you, you are so smart. The only thing I agree with is that the technical education of the USSR was very good, but the humanitarian education is nowhere worse and therefore lost economically.
                  4. Tatyana
                    Tatyana 8 June 2020 00: 43 New
                    -1
                    Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
                    The only thing I agree with is that the USSR’s technical education was very good, but the humanitarian was nowhere worse and therefore lost economically.
                    You still watch the video with Furtsey. He is a very competent analyst and historian and explains a lot of things really correctly and honestly. You'll like it.

                    As for Soviet education, it began to fall apart with the advent of Gorbachev.
                    Already in 1986 in the USSR, the defense of dissertations from the standpoint of the dialectical materialist method was secretly banned. A diamat in logic refers to formal logic, like higher mathematics to elementary mathematics. Even then, even though the diamat was taught at universities, the quality of teaching fell sharply and was reduced simply to the boring formality of the denture without practical application. And meanwhile diamat in logic refers, like higher mathematics to formal logic.
                    As a result, the diatom in the USSR / RF turned into “closed technologies” for the “chosen ones”. And in the West there are whole institutions that, with its help, work against us.
                    The collapse of school education also began in 1986 - with the advent of Gorbachev to power.

                    The first thing in 1986 was the school "democracy" according to Soros. "Patron" Soros flooded Soviet schools with his textbooks. At the same time, the first thing from the RONO was removed the service of inspectors who came to schools every day and checked the work and preparation of teachers for the lesson. The quality of the teacher's work also depended on the assessments of the inspectors, as well as then the certification of the teacher and, accordingly, the increase in his salary. The teachers, who, if they worked playfully, were naturally just happy that they removed the inspectors. And there were about 60-80% of them.
                    Now 10 years ago, inspectors were reinstated in the RONO, but they do not go to schools for a year, but check the work of teachers at the end of the year. And this is very wrong. You can’t endure a teacher’s marriage for a whole year, when you can fix it in time.
                    Well, the most important direction in the destruction of Soviet education in Soros was aimed at the ideological and moral reformatting of humanitarian education. The teachers at school taught such a gag for grants that it was just wonderful to be given how such nonsense could be taught!
                  5. Antonio_Mariarti
                    Antonio_Mariarti 9 June 2020 12: 53 New
                    -1
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
                    The only thing I agree with is that the USSR’s technical education was very good, but the humanitarian was nowhere worse and therefore lost economically.
                    You still watch the video with Furtsey. He is a very competent analyst and historian and explains a lot of things really correctly and honestly. You'll like it.
                    I already studied this and made my conclusion, which I wrote to you. Have you ever read this? How did you refute none of this, or simply cannot? But I liked your move, you are all trying to get me off the main topic and trying to convince me that this is not true. Why? Because education is poor, teachers work according to Soros manuals, and this is all a lie. An interesting attempt to refute all that I wrote. Usually, the facts sorted out the text and tried to refute. But you know that you can’t do it the way you do the economic aspect, or you don’t know well, or didn’t understand at all, this is new for you, and you decided to argue with me differently, very well, you really are a smart woman, sorry, that among your generation there are few (without sarcasm).
                  6. Antonio_Mariarti
                    Antonio_Mariarti 9 June 2020 13: 33 New
                    -1
                    And about education. Soviet education was extremely heterogeneous. Physics and mathematics were quite strong at the global level (thanks to clear state support). On the other hand, due to the dominance of Marxism-Leninism, the economy as a science did not develop, history was very ideologically colored (read from Aron Gurevich, as he had to insert quotes from Engels in a book about the Middle Ages, because he would not have missed otherwise). Ideology penetrated, as we know, even into biology and genetics. Do not forget that after the revolution there was a social scrapping, the former scientific elite was supplanted, expelled, even destroyed by the Bolsheviks as the bearer of bourgeois ideology (read, for example, about Nikolai Kondratiev). A new, Soviet intelligentsia was to come in for a replacement. Naturally, in such conditions, knowledge and scientific tradition were lost. In the West, the scientific tradition was never interrupted, and the scientific base was constantly growing.
                  7. Antonio_Mariarti
                    Antonio_Mariarti 9 June 2020 13: 40 New
                    -1
                    But regarding education reforms, I can largely agree that the reforms that began in 90, which aimed to get the same education as in the West, have largely failed. Here you can argue a lot that they did it on purpose or not. Here I can’t argue with you, as I don’t know about the basics of reform just like you do. And I can’t compare how I didn’t study in those days, but for this I have relatives who tell me how they taught and so on. But for me the main criterion is that it was still not the best, that the USSR could not successfully compete with world leaders. Of course, when our graduates went abroad, they were well quoted there, but this was often because the strongest and most confident specialists were leaving. But a comparison of the average graduate of a Soviet university with the average graduate of a foreign university would most likely not be very joyful
                  8. Tatyana
                    Tatyana 10 June 2020 00: 12 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
                    But for me the main criterion is that it was still not the best, that the USSR could not successfully compete with world leaders.

                    How the Soviet schoolchildren “overtook” America. Dec 10 2018 year


                    Unhappy children of the USSR: free circles and labor education. Capitalism and creators are incompatible Feb 16 2019 year


                    In the early 70s, a serious psychological experiment was conducted on Soviet schoolchildren • Dec 30 2019 year
                  9. Antonio_Mariarti
                    Antonio_Mariarti 11 June 2020 22: 15 New
                    -1
                    In the majority, this is not a problem of education, but a problem of progress. As in the West and around the world, the same thing is observed as with us. As technology of the 21st century, it is both a gift and the scourge of society. Here you can talk for a very long time. It’s just that most students are not interested in school, so do not study. This is the main problem. For example, you can see how they solved this problem in the Scandinavian countries, in the same Finland.
                  10. Tatyana
                    Tatyana 11 June 2020 22: 40 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
                    For example, you can see how they solved this problem in the Scandinavian countries, in the same Finland.
                    I can’t say how they solved this problem in the Scandinavian countries and in Finland. This must be watched and clarified.
                    But I can say how it is being solved and directed in the post-Soviet space using the example of Ukraine itself. Namely.

                    In this regard, Ukrainian Zionist Igor Berkut spoke very frankly about the fate of Ukraine, which he expressed even under Yanukovych. Moreover, the Russians are also concerned to a certain extent.

                    5 million inhabitants will be enough for Ukraine, the rest will be utilized by Igor Berkut. • Jan 20. 2018
                  11. Antonio_Mariarti
                    Antonio_Mariarti 14 June 2020 21: 11 New
                    -1
                    No one artificially reduces the population, as no one introduced any restrictions, neither in Ukraine, nor in our country. Contraction is influenced by urbanism (people traveled to cities to other values. See how Finland decided this.
  2. antivirus
    antivirus 7 June 2020 18: 24 New
    +2
    It was not the USSR that was destroyed, but the communist system, on which the national-state formation in the form of the USSR rested.

    - this is enough for me for a minus, I -67 gr and saw the chatter of a splatter
  • Boris ⁣ Shaver
    Boris ⁣ Shaver 9 June 2020 00: 27 New
    +1
    Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
    The USSR was ready for war better than NATO, but this did not save him from collapse.

    But saved from the war. Yugoslavia, there, was worse prepared - in the end, both war and collapse.
  • Antonio_Mariarti
    Antonio_Mariarti 4 June 2020 12: 52 New
    +6
    The main nuclear weapons. Everything else for containment is secondary. The most important deterrent will be - it is economically dependent.
    1. Boris ⁣ Shaver
      Boris ⁣ Shaver 9 June 2020 00: 33 New
      0
      Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
      The most important deterrent will be - it is economically dependent

      Colonial powers are very economically dependent on their colonies. Are you talking about such an addiction?
  • ccsr
    ccsr 4 June 2020 12: 45 New
    +6
    Quote: rocket757
    This is all for war. There is not much joy in this, but otherwise it does not work out so far.

    The author of the article generally confuses the concept of technology and technical solutions used in military equipment, so it makes no sense to seriously discuss the issue of new technologies with him. For example, work is underway to create a quantum computer, and those who win the race in these technologies will get a huge advantage in military systems. I can recall from the past that scientific work was carried out in the USSR on the creation of a system that allows reading brain impulses in order to control on-board processors and other computer equipment. But as far as I know, things have not gone further than tests so far, although I have no doubt that work is ongoing in this direction and this will be the latest technology.
    1. YakimovSS
      YakimovSS 4 June 2020 18: 08 New
      0
      Oh hello It is already June 2020 from the Nativity of Christ, and the technology for reading brain activity has long been in a citizen at a very high level of determining what kind of impulse originated in the head.
      1. ccsr
        ccsr 4 June 2020 19: 11 New
        +1
        Quote: YakimovSS
        reading brain activity for a long time in a citizen at a very high level of determining what kind of impulse originated in the head.

        I do not dispute this - I wonder where it found application in real weapon systems and military equipment at least at the level of actions of a military pilot.
      2. Simsimal
        Simsimal 13 June 2020 08: 07 New
        -1
        Shcha, the secret warrant officer from the ZGV will tell you. It was wrong. VUS it is not needed, but a certificate from the IPA would not hurt ....
        ...... Rhetorical reasoning.
  • Vadim237
    Vadim237 4 June 2020 20: 32 New
    0
    First of all, these are new alloys of manufacturing technology, electronics, computer systems and much more - for industry, everything will come in handy in pieces.
  • Civil
    Civil 4 June 2020 11: 33 New
    +5
    All three come from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 4 June 2020 12: 12 New
      +6
      Well, the ancestors tried, the great reserve left to the descendants.
      Moreover, not only material, but everything else.
      They are great people, Thank you!
  • antivirus
    antivirus 4 June 2020 11: 42 New
    +1
    it pleases the initiates, but how to instill peace and confidence in the future to the uninitiated?
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 4 June 2020 11: 49 New
      +1
      Quote: antivirus
      it pleases the initiates, but how to instill peace and confidence in the future to the uninitiated?

      A good question - for the civilian population is very relevant, and at all times!
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 4 June 2020 12: 17 New
        +2
        Tatyana, oksts ... we don’t have much fun, some experts who will show you everything, explain it to anyone, prove it!
    2. rocket757
      rocket757 4 June 2020 12: 15 New
      +2
      Schaub does not believe with the most faithful friends of our country, it must be completely OUR.
      By the way, who is it then, who is not dedicated now? They either don’t want to know anything at all or read / listen, it’s not clear who.
  • NEXUS
    NEXUS 4 June 2020 12: 00 New
    +9
    The nuclear submarines are the nuclear submarines of project 955 Borey, which “make noise” by only 108 decibels.

    Author, trim the sturgeon!
    The physical characteristic of sound volume is the sound pressure level. Measured in decibels (dB). 30 dB is a whisper. 50-65 dB - quiet / loud conversation. 70-80 dB - scream. 100 dB - tutti of a symphony orchestra. 140 dB - the plane at the start.

    If the submarine gave out such decibels to the ocean, it would have been heard on the moon.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 4 June 2020 12: 21 New
      +2
      Quote: NEXUS
      If the submarine gave out such decibels to the ocean, it would have been heard on the moon.

      I’ll try to clarify from acoustic terms - there is such a ratio SIGNAL \ NOISE and it is also measured in dB. The bigger it is, the better. True 108 db. this is an exorbitant amount !!! this does not happen in nature ... except in space, in a vacuum.
      1. Kalmar
        Kalmar 4 June 2020 12: 39 New
        +1
        Quote: rocket757
        True 108 db. this is an exorbitant amount !!! this does not happen in kind

        And what is beyond her? A shot from the AK gives up to 160 dB near the muzzle end.

        Quote: rocket757
        except in space, in a vacuum

        Are we still talking about acoustics?
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 4 June 2020 12: 50 New
          +1
          Quote: Kalmar
          And what is beyond her? A shot from the AK gives up to 160 dB near the muzzle end.

          What YOU indicated is SPL (sound pressure level \ volume). I pointed to another parameter, SNR is the signal-to-noise ratio ... it's like about the level of silence.
          1. Kalmar
            Kalmar 4 June 2020 12: 52 New
            0
            Quote: rocket757
            What YOU indicated is SPL (sound pressure level \ volume)

            I thought the noise of the submarines was estimated precisely by this value. True, usually, they do not specify anywhere.
          2. YakimovSS
            YakimovSS 4 June 2020 18: 16 New
            +1
            It seems to me that Kalmar is right and 108 dB is the level of broadband noise emitted by the submarine itself. Only as if this figure is not very clear where it came from and if you take the similar striped characteristics, then this is a very ordinary indicator for their underwater missile carriers. About 30 years ago.
    2. Kalmar
      Kalmar 4 June 2020 12: 38 New
      0
      Quote: NEXUS
      If the submarine gave out such decibels to the ocean, it would have been heard on the moon.

      Here: https://rg.ru/2015/06/22/borey-site.html - approximately such values ​​are indicated. I suppose that we are talking about the maximum noise level when the submarine is in full swing. Well, do not forget that decibels - the logarithmic value, varies non-linearly: the difference of 10 dB - is felt just two times quieter / louder.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 4 June 2020 13: 00 New
        0
        In general, it is necessary to clarify what for what, and then confusion.
        Excess noise reproduced by the boat on the go, in relation to the natural noise background of the environment ... this is probably noisy. But then again, at what distance should I measure it?
        In low noise mode, not on the go, which is higher? External background or boat noise? How much and in which direction ... this is more like determining the signal / noise ...
        But, what are the terms for submariners / search engines ??? I only know from radio equipment, so what is needed is the opinion of a specialist in the profile.
    3. Pilat2009
      Pilat2009 4 June 2020 13: 25 New
      0
      Quote: NEXUS
      The nuclear submarines are the nuclear submarines of project 955 Borey, which “make noise” by only 108 decibels.

      Author, trim the sturgeon!
      The physical characteristic of sound volume is the sound pressure level. Measured in decibels (dB). 30 dB is a whisper. 50-65 dB - quiet / loud conversation. 70-80 dB - scream. 100 dB - tutti of a symphony orchestra. 140 dB - the plane at the start.

      If the submarine gave out such decibels to the ocean, it would have been heard on the moon.

      Well, our boats were called "roaring cows" by the way, there was an article about the discovery of pl, so it seemed like they came to the conclusion that the Americans have learned to find pl by other parameters, something is connected with the movement of water
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 4 June 2020 16: 14 New
        +2
        Quote: Pilat2009
        Well, our boats were called "roaring cows"

        Roaring cows were called our second generation submarines. And that’s not all.
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 4 June 2020 20: 00 New
          +1
          2nd generation, project "Anchar", very noisy, but the fastest ... none of those who could defeat her could catch them on the water, under water.
      2. rocket757
        rocket757 4 June 2020 18: 39 New
        0
        Quote: Pilat2009
        Well, our boats were called "roaring cows" by the way, here like that article was about the discovery of pl, so it seems they came to the conclusion that the Americans have learned to find pl by other parameters -

        And if you think about it ??? Why should striped invent other DEAR, COMPLEX, search methods for our nuclear submarines, if they are NOISY, and IT IS THE MOST EASY IDENTIFIED PARAMETER of any ship !!! like handwriting, fingerprints ... and in a dense environment, in water, sounds, echoes are far and well transmitted!
        Yes, when our boat surfaced in an AUG order, how did they not hear it?
        The rest of the methods are much more complicated and less accurate ... if the boat sank deeper!
        In general, ourselves, ourselves ...
        "Roaring cows" nicknamed "new" dill armored personnel carrier .... their own and for the cause, by the way.
      3. Quadro
        Quadro 8 June 2020 15: 39 New
        0
        Well, not like amer boats. Which were rejected somewhere a couple of years ago and which were noisy throughout the whole district.
  • knn54
    knn54 4 June 2020 11: 32 New
    +3
    Still quality, but in quantity.
    1. Mitroha
      Mitroha 4 June 2020 12: 07 New
      +2
      Quote: knn54
      Still quality, but in quantity.

      Still not "partners" outside and not thieves inside, and life would be better and the development of the country went faster.
  • Far B
    Far B 4 June 2020 11: 33 New
    +4
    According to Zircon, IMHO, the main remark in the article
    according to president Putin
    All other information is fragmentary. And recently, the words of Mr. Putin, as well as the words of the others "their noble", are somehow not very hard to believe.
    By the noiselessness of the submarines, it’s still a Soviet backlog, according to electronic warfare, I suspect in many ways as well. And where is the real Russian development period? Where are the notorious Almaty and Pak fa? Where is at least something? Just words, promises.
    1. antivirus
      antivirus 4 June 2020 11: 44 New
      +2
      And where is the real Russian development period?
      - they give money to support the pants of the defense industry complex, they did not squander the reserve of the USSR - already a lot.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 4 June 2020 20: 36 New
        +2
        Most of the products and technical solutions for them from the USSR were out of date 30 years ago - we already do our own and develop from communications to satellites and rockets.
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 4 June 2020 20: 51 New
          +2
          There is the present, but there is a plan then, but not implemented for one reason or another! An effective fusion of old and new! This is normal.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Quadro
      Quadro 8 June 2020 15: 41 New
      -1
      Quote: Far In
      According to Zircon, IMHO, the main remark in the article
      according to president Putin
      All other information is fragmentary. And recently, the words of Mr. Putin, as well as the words of the others "their noble", are somehow not very hard to believe.
      By the noiselessness of the submarines, it’s still a Soviet backlog, according to electronic warfare, I suspect in many ways as well. And where is the real Russian development period? Where are the notorious Almaty and Pak fa? Where is at least something? Just words, promises.

      Another tale about the "Soviet groundwork". Much of this has already become obsolete for 20-30 years. I already thought not to see another comment about the "backlog".
  • Break through
    Break through 4 June 2020 11: 44 New
    -2
    More laser technology!
  • The comment was deleted.
  • fider
    fider 4 June 2020 12: 04 New
    +3
    It was possible to reduce the noise of the submarines after purchasing from Japan milling machines with CNC for screw processing. After that, Russia leads, and all the rest stand still? Do not tell my grandmother! laughing tongue hi
    1. Antonio_Mariarti
      Antonio_Mariarti 4 June 2020 12: 48 New
      +5
      But the machines did not learn how to do this ...
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 4 June 2020 20: 38 New
        0
        Already learned and consoles with programs also in St. Petersburg do.
    2. Pilat2009
      Pilat2009 4 June 2020 13: 31 New
      0
      Quote: fider
      It was possible to reduce the noise of the submarines after purchasing from Japan milling machines with CNC for screw processing. After that, Russia leads, and all the rest stand still? Do not tell my grandmother! laughing tongue hi

      Well, there are special coatings and depreciation of equipment. In general, the purchase of machine tools made it possible to REDUCE the noise. But Americans, for example, grind their propeller shafts for submarines far underground in the desert so that even passing cars do not affect the quality of processing
    3. IC
      IC 8 June 2020 08: 40 New
      0
      All is correct. But this was a very long time ago and did not solve all the problems. After that, significant changes in technology occurred, including on engines, which led to a modern level of noise.
  • Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 4 June 2020 12: 11 New
    -2
    The least noisy of the nuclear submarines are the nuclear submarines of project 955 Borey, which “make noise” by only 108 decibels.

    A strange achievement. For comparison:
    The noise of a variety of office equipment, a vacuum cleaner - 80 decibels (dB); The sound of dance music in a nightclub - 110 decibels (dB); The noise of a flying airplane is 140 decibels (dB); The noise of repair work is up to 100 decibels (dB).
    .
    I acknowledge the successes in creating the means of electronic warfare, air defense (though without combat use) ... The main hurt is that the Russian land has not been impoverished by the Kulibins and Left-handed people.
    1. mvg
      mvg 4 June 2020 12: 58 New
      +7
      that the Russian land was not impoverished by the Kulibins and Left-handed people.

      What the Russian land is not impoverished in is fools, we have them stocked for 100 years ahead ... ©
      1. Ross xnumx
        Ross xnumx 4 June 2020 13: 33 New
        +1
        Quote: mvg
        What the Russian land is not impoverished in is fools, we have them stocked for 100 years ahead ... ©

        It's right. And he also added frank Paskuda-tihushniki, trying to poison the lives of others, in extreme cases, spoil the mood.
        1. mvg
          mvg 5 June 2020 07: 45 New
          -1
          as a last resort, spoil the mood

          What kind of mood is it that is so easy to ruin? We must fight this, Vasilich!
  • Antonio_Mariarti
    Antonio_Mariarti 4 June 2020 12: 27 New
    +1
    Oh, we would try to redirect our technological effectiveness in the military sphere to the civilian sphere. At least then they could compete within the Russian Federation.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 4 June 2020 20: 39 New
      0
      Diversification of the military-industrial complex is already underway.
  • KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 4 June 2020 12: 37 New
    10
    Not an article, but an advertising campaign with slogans and figures taken from the ceiling and from Internet rumors. By noise Boreev at 108dB - but not 107 or 109? A chainsaw is less noisy (about 90dB), and you can hear it in a quiet forest for tens of kilometers .. Zircon flying over a thousand kilometers ... and where are the test results? Kraukha, dropping and jamming everything by 400 km ... From Rostov to Volgograd, for example, so much with something and what? and this is not a radio station, this is a station for suppressing radio channels .. So, I can remove a control channel from Volgograd over Rostov? In which ranges? What then is her radiation power? Yes, a tyrchik should ride behind her the size of the same Krasukha and the crew should sit in a special screened capsule. Always peremptory in describing the characteristics of technology .. as if the authors of such descriptions of TOiIE from the documentation package of complexes read ..
    1. Aag
      Aag 5 June 2020 16: 39 New
      0
      "I am always surprised by the categorical character of the technique."
      I absolutely agree.
      But this applies to you to the same extent. By the way, you probably had the opportunity to look into the documentation (the passport of the chainsaw, for example) before writing: "The chainsaw makes less noise (about 90dB)."
      From the passport for the Husgvarna 140 chainsaw:
      Guaranteed sound power-114dB,
      Sound pressure on the operator’s ear is 102dB.))).
      But in general, as mentioned by commentators above, it’s not clear what kind of digital is 108dB what do we measure? For signal-to-noise ratio, this is an outstanding indicator for sound-reproducing equipment, it pulls on Hi-Fi ...
      1. KVU-NSVD
        KVU-NSVD 5 June 2020 17: 21 New
        0
        Quote: AAG
        From the passport for the Husgvarna 140 chainsaw:
        Guaranteed sound power-114dB,

        I have Calm. On the saw next to the icon with the headphones it says 96 dB ... The only option with a modern submarine and a noise level of 108 dB that I believe in is the full underwater mode, which is used as a last resort.
  • smaug78
    smaug78 4 June 2020 12: 40 New
    +7
    Russia is the leader in the development of submarine noise suppression technologies, and this position was taken by our country in Soviet times.
    Polonsky's nonsense again
  • mvg
    mvg 4 June 2020 12: 55 New
    +7
    Ilya, do not write pliz ... This is not yours. From the word Absolutely. I could not read the text to the end, I repent, but I see nonsense in each paragraph ...
    Can you tell me the amount, I will try to find like-minded people, we will fold every month to your RFP. And he himself in vocational schools, at least you get a specialty. Not a welder, so a locksmith
    PS: The comment is written BEFORE reading the comments ... Once again, do not write more. Respect people
  • Free wind
    Free wind 4 June 2020 13: 48 New
    +3
    In which case are Boreas the least noisy? If they lie at the bottom? If moving on the smallest? When are they the quietest? By star, then we are all one another lower noise. Passing the Bering Strait, you do not want to, but you walk along the coast of the United States. And if you walk in the middle between the islands (Rotmanova and Kruzenshtern), you can swim two kilometers from the American village.
  • gridasov
    gridasov 4 June 2020 13: 58 New
    0
    Such statements can only be challenged by those who own, for example, a new type of propulsion, which is the source of the greatest noise both outside and inside. Or for the foolish it is written that the electronic warfare system for hundreds of kilometers. And after all, all this is on the old element base. So they took and squeezed out a completely new level of energy from old induction devices, capacitors.
  • Vladimir SHajkin
    Vladimir SHajkin 4 June 2020 14: 26 New
    0
    Sorry, but not on this list the most important - political.
    All of these either strengthen policy or protect.
  • d4rkmesa
    d4rkmesa 4 June 2020 15: 50 New
    +3
    The first point spoils everything, turning all the writing into a yellow farce. "In terms of the level of development of technologies for suppressing noise of submarines, Russia is leading, and this position was taken by our country back in Soviet times." - this is far from the case, there is no need to replace reality with wishlist. The British and Americans got to the level of 110db low-frequency noise much earlier than ours. The fact that in some computer game Ash is 105db, and SeaWolf 110 does not mean anything. In fact, only in this century did our people finally get to this level (with the nuclear submarine), and this is not bad.
  • serkos
    serkos 4 June 2020 15: 52 New
    0
    108 decibels is a rock concert level
  • Indifferent
    Indifferent 4 June 2020 17: 35 New
    +4
    The author should not write nonsense, especially where "not Copenhagen". I do not know what is there in hypersound or electronic warfare, but I know how things are on the submarine. So at the expense of "Borea". I don’t know how it makes noise, but 108 decibels is practically the takeoff of a jet plane. Well, if you don't listen to the turbines themselves. There are 130 decibels. And 108 is a rock concert when the musicians themselves go deaf with time.
    Now the passage through the Bering Strait is "imperceptible". Our boats do not go there underwater. There is a support group from Kamchatka headed by an icebreaker. They meet a boat in the Chukchi Sea and lead through the strait openly. Another thing is that Americans do not always discover this. And this is in the sea, where there is almost no intensive navigation. As for the Strait of Malacca, the Americans, for all their "ubiquity", discovered our boat on the surface only on the third day. Because there it was necessary to go on the surface for a week. The depths also do not allow the regime of straits.
  • Shelest2000
    Shelest2000 4 June 2020 17: 35 New
    0
    The least noisy of the nuclear submarines are the nuclear submarines of project 955 Borey, which “make noise” by only 108 decibels.

    Interestingly, what is the noise of NATO submarines?
  • Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 4 June 2020 19: 24 New
    +3
    nice to read, so Russia is alive .... a typo is not 108, but 18 db
  • bk0010
    bk0010 4 June 2020 20: 34 New
    0
    Russia is the leader in the development of submarine noise suppression technologies, and this position was taken by our country in Soviet times.
    This is not true. The states have always been ahead of us in this. For a long time this issue was not dealt with at all in the USSR. Engaged - it turned out Pike-B, very good. The quietest boat - Sea wolf
  • rotkiv04
    rotkiv04 8 June 2020 08: 03 New
    0
    These are technologies of the USSR, not the Russian Federation, modern technologists and designers cannot even bring the Federation to mind
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Thomas the Unbelieving
    Thomas the Unbelieving 16 June 2020 17: 57 New
    0
    You know, I felt bad from reading your comments about the communist regime and the USSR. To what brought this educated sect into our country, which after the coup d'etat committed by the Khrushchev-Dnepropetrovsk mafia was first called "nomenclature." It is obvious that now in power there are quite a few who once again change their identities, destroying our country and commit treason for the sake of their own wealth. In the old days they would be called enemies of the people. But at first they called themselves “democrats”, then “liberals”, then “elite” and “ury-patriots”. In fact, this is a sect that pretends to be Russian citizens, but in fact, a sect in the service of the unclean Trinity, which includes the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO. All sorts of Wads, the OSCE and other servants of world imperialism still sing along with them. I can testify: World War II was our common cause. The whole Union restored the destruction, from which Belarus, Ukraine, the Baltic states and a significant part of Russia in the European part suffered primarily. People’s labor and mind were invested, because even in those conditions, life was constantly getting better and retail prices were falling every spring and salaries were rising. The stores were full and there was no shortage of goods. The village was worse — the men were defeated by the war, but the state was constantly striving to improve the situation. Education was accessible to all, though it was taught classically, boys separately, girls separately. And that was reasonable. They taught logic, astronomy, military science, carpentry, metalwork, electrical. Not crammed, but tried to understand the essence of the issue. And then the state had big plans — look at least Stalin’s “Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR”. Everything was destroyed after his death by an irresponsible party, where the entrance was opened to crooks who stood above the elected people and the Soviet state apparatus responsible to the people. One could tell a lot, only do not believe that they are lying about the only successful humanistic project in the history of people. Understand essentially how we are being deceived.