Lukashenko outraged by Russia's refusal to conduct joint development of a rocket for MLRS

Lukashenko outraged by Russia's refusal to conduct joint development of a rocket for MLRS

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko was outraged by Russia's refusal to conduct joint development of missile weapons and to provide a Russian testing ground for Belarusian missile tests. This was reported by the press service of the head of state.


It was reported that on Friday Lukashenko visited the Belarusian weapons developer OKB TSP, where he was informed that Russia does not provide its military training grounds for testing the Belarusian missile. What Lukashenko reacted in a sharp form.

No need to kneel before the Russians. This is a signal if our closest ally not only does not agree to make a rocket with us, but does not provide a training ground ... (...)

- he said.

The Belarusian leader demanded that domestic gunsmiths continue to develop missiles with a destruction range of up to 300 km. At the same time, he noted that China provided significant assistance in the creation of rockets MLRS "Polonaise" of Belarus.

We need our own rocket. We cannot create weaponby which we will depend on other countries. Nobody will just give us this weapon. We were lucky to come to an agreement with the Chinese, they need to bow for it. But beyond this dependence should not be

- said Lukashenko.

Earlier, the State Committee on Military Industry of Belarus stated that there are no military training ranges in the republic at which live firing with a range of 300 km or more is possible.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

223 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mavrikiy 22 May 2020 17: 23 New
    • 42
    • 50
    -8
    Lukashenko outraged by Russia's refusal to conduct joint development of a rocket for MLRS
    Friendship, friendship, and tobaccos apart, with a huckster. repeatToday we, tomorrow China, and there the USA .....
    there are no military training grounds in the republic where combat firing with a range of 300 km or more is possible.
    Ok, contractor and go ....
    1. AzDefence2020 22 May 2020 17: 28 New
      • 17
      • 87
      -70
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Friendship, friendship, and tobaccos apart

      What about fraternal bonds? And also say southerners traders.
      1. Voyager 22 May 2020 17: 31 New
        • 97
        • 18
        +79
        Quote: AzDefence2020
        What about fraternal bonds?

        What kind of fraternal bonds are these even if they did not recognize Crimea as Russia?
        1. Leshy1975 22 May 2020 18: 24 New
          • 59
          • 37
          +22
          Quote: Voyager
          Quote: AzDefence2020
          What about fraternal bonds?

          What kind of fraternal bonds are these even if they did not recognize Crimea as Russia?

          Gref better ask a question. What kind of bank is this with state participation that he is afraid to open offices in Crimea.
          Source (news.tut.by from 01.03.2019/XNUMX/XNUMX):
          Lukashenko. - In the first year of this problem, I was at the inauguration of Poroshenko. Four years ago or when. I, before the Rada, was surrounded by Western and Ukrainian journalists, probably hundreds of people [...] and began to torture: “Whose Crimea is this: Russian or Ukrainian?” I did not prepare for this issue, and did not want to discuss this topic. I asked them a question [...]: “Tell me, how many Ukrainians died who defended Crimea during the attack, as they then indicated - Russia attacked, captured [...]? How many Ukrainians died defending their territory? ” Silence. No one. And how many shots sounded? No one. Well, then you silently agreed that Crimea is not yours at least ...
          - Tell me, what will change from the fact that I declare live that our Crimea or Russian Crimea? What will change? Well, they’ll make a noise. In Russia, this will be news in the evening. And in the morning they’ll forget. And they won’t say thanks, and don’t. It's not a thank you. In the West? Well, maybe someone will notice. Somewhere else. Our people will think: “Well Lukashenko, why did you get into this? So much time has passed". In Ukraine they will say: “Dog” - and spit in my direction. What will we get as a result? We need to look a little further, deeper in these matters. And in this case, at least try to understand me ...


          PS This accordion, why the Republic of Belarus did not recognize the Crimea, is already really tired. Or, for example, the Security Council of the Russian Federation is afraid of sanctions, and should Lukashenko instead of Gref rush into the embrasure? Lukashenko will not be more stupid than Gref.
          1. Voyager 22 May 2020 18: 49 New
            • 57
            • 22
            +35
            Gref, unlike Lukashenko, doesn’t scratch his tongue about brotherhood.

            In my childhood I had a story when I was walking in a park with two classmates. Two older guys approached us and began to ask about money. When the brawl began, they started with me. So one of my classmates ran away shouting that he was for help, and the second, as I remember now: while I was lying on the ground under the kicks, the second stood with his arms outstretched and mumbled something like "guys, can we talk calmly?". After this story, these two of my classmates, of course, remained such, but they ceased to be friends for me.

            So that's what I am for. There are contradictions in your statements. You refer to the twisty phrases of Lukashenko that they say they make a noise, spit and die down if he recognizes the Crimea as ours and it all ends there. You interpret this as “rushing into the embrasure”, forgetting that in the case of recognition, Old Man might not have to bark, that we don’t have enough funding, help and all sorts of feedback.
            The question is, what is better: the absence of spitting from Ukraine or mutually beneficial fraternal relations with Russia, when one supports the other, and not when Lukashenko at the beginning of all the mess at the Minsk talks with a smile and patting on the shoulder met Poroshenko ..

            There is a reason and a consequence: if you are my friend, I will help you.
            And if you are throwing a friend in a brawl, what kind of mutual assistance, “give me money” and other things like that, can we talk about? Lukashenko wants to be friends only when it is beneficial to him. So we will help when it is profitable for us.

            1. Leshy1975 22 May 2020 19: 00 New
              • 18
              • 11
              +7
              Quote: Voyager
              In my childhood I had a story when I was walking in a park with two classmates. Two older guys approached us and began to ask about money. When the brawl began, they started with me. So one of my classmates ran away shouting that he was for help, and the second, as I remember now: while I was lying on the ground under the kicks, the second stood with his arms outstretched and mumbled something like "guys, can we talk calmly?". After this story, these two of my classmates, of course, remained such, but they ceased to be friends for me.

              So that's what I am for. There are contradictions in your statements. You refer to the twisty phrases of Lukashenko that they say they make a noise, spit and die down if he recognizes the Crimea as ours and it all ends there. You interpret this as “rushing into the embrasure”, forgetting that in the case of recognition, Old Man might not have to bark, that we don’t have enough funding, help and all sorts of feedback.
              The question is, what is better: the absence of spitting from Ukraine or mutually beneficial fraternal relations with Russia, when one supports the other, and not when Lukashenko at the beginning of all the mess at the Minsk talks with a smile and patting on the shoulder met Poroshenko ..

              There is a reason and a consequence: if you are my friend, I will help you.
              And if you are throwing a friend in a brawl, what kind of mutual assistance, “give me money” and other things like that, can we talk about? Lukashenko wants to be friends only when it is beneficial to him. So we will help when it is profitable for us.

              If a politician categorically says NO (or YES), it is no longer a politician. Are you Mr. Peskov (press secretary of Mr. Putin), when he says something, can you understand it clearly or even understand it at all? For example (source TASS):
              The presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov does not yet know whether Russia will offer the participation of its military in a possible UN peacekeeping mission in the Donbass.
              “I can’t say this yet, because no modalities have been defined yet,” a Kremlin spokesman admitted to reporters.

              PS Well, consider that Gref has already fled during the fight. But Lukashenko, no matter how he was exposed as a collective farmer, is not as simple as many would like or would think. He is a politician.
              And who declared Poroshenko the best choice, and tried hard for his election campaign, I don’t even want to raise this topic. Why, after that, Lukashenko did not clap him on the shoulder.
              1. Shurik70 22 May 2020 22: 11 New
                • 12
                • 5
                +7
                And where is the guarantee that Lukashenko told the truth?
                After his constant lie that we sell gas to Europe cheaper than to Belarus, there is no confidence anymore.
              2. The comment was deleted.
                1. Boris Chernikov 23 May 2020 00: 26 New
                  • 9
                  • 4
                  +5
                  The whole joke, by the way, was that Gref did not betray anyone and did everything right. He transferred his branches to Crimea. RNKB is a local bank .. As a result, Sber cards are processed there and Sber did not lose business in Europe
                  1. businessv 24 May 2020 14: 32 New
                    • 3
                    • 1
                    +2
                    Quote: Boris Chernikov
                    The whole joke by the way, that Gref did not betray anyone and did everything right. He in the Crimea handed over his branches to the RNKB — this is a local bank ..
                    Pancake! Well, where is such nonsense about this bastard and his "right" actions ?! RNKB is not a "local" bank, but a bank created on the finished and developed base of the former Ukrainian Privatbank! RNKB still uses all the private premises, and given that this is a private bank, it remains only to envy such a business when it comes to everything ready and use it! But RNKB still has to go and go to Privat - so wretched service, especially digital, still look! So Gref didn’t do anything right, colleague! Such a "banker" must be thrown into the landfill for a long time, in view of his clearly anti-popular actions, statements and a clear desire to get into politics!
                    1. Boris Chernikov 31 May 2020 12: 05 New
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      -1
                      uhh, how many populist decisions .. do I understand correctly that in order for you to be nice you need to jeopardize state revenues? And yes, don’t worry about the Russian National Bank of Russia and the quality of service. it’s especially funny to read about “anti-people’s actions” ... you’re a “colleague” of you .. you don’t understand anything in the economy
                      1. businessv 31 May 2020 12: 12 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Boris Chernikov
                        And yes, don’t worry about the RNCR and the quality of service.
                        And again I was amused! I am very worried about the quality of service because I use this bank, due to the lack of others at the time of opening the account! And as for my knowledge of the economy, it’s not up to you to judge - they have not grown yet, judging by the ability to express their thoughts in writing! Stoke for the headstock, the flag in your hands, you and I are now on the same team with it! hi
                      2. Boris Chernikov 31 May 2020 12: 15 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Well, yes .. remind me of the amount of profit that the RNKB receives and how much Sberbank receives from foreign economic activity? You are a specialist and you should know
                      3. businessv 31 May 2020 12: 30 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Boris Chernikov
                        remind me of the amount of profit that the RNKB receives and how much Sberbank receives from foreign economic activity?

                        It is impossible to talk with you about the specifics in the economy because you have a mess in your head on this topic. What is the profit from foreign trade activities in the Crimea ?! What are you talking about? You wrote
                        so that you have a nice need to jeopardize state revenues?
                        What incomes to the state from the Crimean bank created in AvrVy you speak
                      4. businessv 31 May 2020 12: 44 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: businessv
                        What kind of income to the state from the Crimean bank created in av

                        I will continue. What kind of income to the state from the Crimean bank, created in an emergency mode are you talking about? What kind of revenues to the state in general can be from a subsidized region? To write about Crimea, you need to live here, but in order to understand the economy of Crimea, you need to participate in it.
                      5. Boris Chernikov 31 May 2020 12: 51 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        hmm .. so you and the couch expert) everything is banal .. the sberbank enters into the Crimea automatically for ALL subsidiaries of Sberbank impose sanctions that puts an end to the bank’s work abroad. Something tells me that tens of billions of dollars in losses are the work of sberbank in Crimea will not pay back .. But you continue to talk about the "anti-popular actions of Sberbank" .. you don’t forget to skip
                      6. businessv 31 May 2020 18: 06 New
                        • 0
                        • 1
                        -1
                        Quote: Boris Chernikov
                        hmm .. so you and couch expert) everything is banal .. sberbank is included in the Crimea-machine in relation to ALL subsidiaries of Sberbank

                        Are you raving Stop pouring phrases unrelated to my post and generally incoherent sentences - this is stupid! There are specific answers - write, but it seems that you are from 7th grade and immediately to VO. Learn child! hi
      2. Anton Lako 25 May 2020 12: 49 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Well, what are you? Which politician is Lukashenko? There wouldn’t be this story with missiles. He would have invented another. Recently, for every reason and without reason, he is trying to spit in the direction of Russia. It is just that this year the peak of payments on external loans falls and his government begs a loan from the IMF and the World Bank. This is the concept of brotherhood and friendship at this merchant. We have figured it out in Belarus for a long time. He doesn’t even think that his spitting “blows like that” blows back to Belarus
  2. Boris Chernikov 23 May 2020 00: 22 New
    • 17
    • 4
    +13
    There is a difference: Gref provided Sberbank cards with a local municipal bank, while Lukashenko supplies fuel and lubricants for the Armed Forces of Ukraine ..
    1. Leshy1975 23 May 2020 12: 14 New
      • 7
      • 6
      +1
      Quote: Boris Chernikov
      There is a difference: Gref provided Sberbank cards with a local municipal bank, while Lukashenko supplies fuel and lubricants for the Armed Forces of Ukraine ..

      Well, the Russian Federation supplied fuel and lubricants for the Armed Forces, as well as much more for the military industry of Ukraine and the Armed Forces. Or do you not know that while the hottest battles were going on in the Donbass, a military-technical cooperation between the Russian Federation and Uraina was active (source news.myseldon.com from December 27 2018):
      Former Minister of Transport of Ukraine Yevgeny Chervonenko criticized Russian prosecutors in Kiev. According to him, Ukraine is completely dependent on the Russian Federation for a number of points ...
      "You think most tanks in the ATO Are they driving ExxonMobil, or Texaco? The income of the diesel engine is "Rosneft"and" Mozyr "...
      Moreover, Chervonenko noted that even the armor for the latest Ukrainian tanks is made not in Ukraine, but in Nizhny Tagil, from where Kiev military industrialists buy it for military vehicles.

      The fact is that the Security Council of the Russian Federation did not dare to substitute for US sanctions, although it is a bank with state. participation and even on its own territory is afraid of these sanctions. But you consider it right, and for some reason you want Lukashenko to substitute sanctions. Although he, too, like the Security Council of the Russian Federation, has the exact same task, not to fall under the distribution and not to substitute RB.
      But Gref, for some reason, is well done, and Lukashenko, for some reason, is wrong in the same situation. Strange logic, don’t you? Or should Lukashenko be more a patriot of the Russian Federation than the Russian Federation itself?
      1. Proud. 24 May 2020 13: 39 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        "... Moreover, Chervonenko noted that even the armor for the latest Ukrainian tanks is not made in Ukraine, but in Nizhny Tagil, from where Kiev military industrialists buy it for military vehicles ..." - Yeah ... That is, "gentleman "Chervonnenko, believe the word? Sorry, I won’t.
      2. Boris Chernikov 31 May 2020 12: 02 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        yes yes yes .. did Putin directly order the delivery? Or were private owners circumventing the sale through the same Republic of Belarus as well? By the way, deliveries were limited in the end, but Lukashenko OFFICIALLY supports Kiev .. THIS is the difference. And yes .. ex-ministers they can sound what’s convenient for them .. since Ukraine doesn’t produce new tanks from the word at all, and those crumbs were made from old stocks, so tell someone else .. If you don’t like that “St. Luke” someone considers a cheap shopkeeper -It's your problems
  • Mordvin 3 22 May 2020 19: 02 New
    • 14
    • 14
    0
    Quote: Voyager
    What kind of fraternal bonds are these even if they did not recognize Crimea as Russia?

    Is Russia ready to feed the whole of Belarus in exchange for recognition of the Crimea?
    1. Voyager 22 May 2020 19: 17 New
      • 21
      • 15
      +6
      In the sense? Russia is already feeding.
      1. Mordvin 3 22 May 2020 19: 21 New
        • 10
        • 11
        -1
        Quote: Voyager
        In what sense?

        In the sense that they were promised to disconnect from the international banking system SWIFT, in response to the recognition of the Crimea.
        1. Voyager 22 May 2020 19: 23 New
          • 15
          • 9
          +6
          Who promised when? And why, if we hadn’t been turned off for the “capture” of Crimea?
          1. Mordvin 3 22 May 2020 19: 26 New
            • 14
            • 13
            +1
            Quote: Voyager
            Who promised when?

            This was an interview with Lukashenko.
            Quote: Voyager
            And why, if we hadn’t been turned off for the “capture” of Crimea?

            Belarus was compared with Russia, which half of Europe inflates oil and gas.
            1. Voyager 22 May 2020 19: 35 New
              • 17
              • 6
              +11
              Lukashenko says a lot, don’t you?
              Quote: mordvin xnumx
              Belarus was compared with Russia, which half of Europe inflates oil and gas.

              Here I am about that. Recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia as affected by those who recognized?
              1. Mordvin 3 22 May 2020 19: 39 New
                • 10
                • 10
                0
                Quote: Voyager
                Recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia as affected by those who recognized?

                No way. Europe needs a gas station.
              2. Aviator_ 22 May 2020 22: 47 New
                • 13
                • 7
                +6
                If you forgot, then I remind you: after the formation of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, a search began for countries that recognize them. Luke then directly asked Medved (then the President of the Russian Federation) whether he would compensate for the losses that Belarus would suffer after the recognition of these republics? The bear said nothing, recognition and did not follow. Luke is responsible for his collective farm, not for Medvedsky.
                1. Voyager 22 May 2020 22: 56 New
                  • 9
                  • 6
                  +3
                  Quote: Aviator_
                  Does it compensate for the losses that Belarus will suffer after the recognition of these republics? The bear said nothing, recognition and did not follow.

                  Lovely bargaining, just like friends. Do you have quotes along with Medvedev’s silence?
                2. AnderS 25 May 2020 19: 22 New
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  -1
                  Lovely bargaining, just like friends. Do you have quotes along with Medvedev’s silence?

                  Lukashenko takes care of his people ... If he were the same “man” with reduced social responsibility as Puten, he would have sold all of Belarus for a snuff of tobacco for a long time and would have lived on pension in his estate ...
              3. Boris Chernikov 23 May 2020 00: 27 New
                • 10
                • 2
                +8
                Lol..and a lot of sanctions imposed against those who admitted? Zero .. In fact, Lukashenko began to demand a dough .. So friendship itself .. more like prostitution
      2. Vadim237 22 May 2020 20: 57 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        The main question is how to technically disable this shutdown - there is no one button for this.
  • figwam 22 May 2020 20: 24 New
    • 15
    • 7
    +8
    No need to kneel before the Russians.

    We were lucky to come to an agreement with the Chinese, they need to bow for it.

    So if dependence on Russia, then kneel, if dependence on China, then only bow? And such a logic will always be.
  • Boris Chernikov 23 May 2020 00: 20 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    By the way, yes, let Kiev be asked to provide a training ground .. otherwise they help them more than we do
  • Hagen 22 May 2020 17: 36 New
    • 42
    • 9
    +33
    Quote: AzDefence2020
    What about fraternal bonds?

    Old Man for every difficulty in the negotiations promises to turn to the EU. How to share secrets with such a "brother". Missile technology is an area sensitive to privacy. Anyone here is more expensive to let themselves. Time will pass and he will lower the price of gas by blackmail also in the production sphere. Do we need this?
    1. Mavrikiy 22 May 2020 17: 44 New
      • 12
      • 13
      -1
      Quote: Hagen
      Missile technology is an area sensitive to privacy. Anyone here is more expensive to let themselves.

      So we worked together with India and now she has a brahmos. And this one is not adequate.
    2. Vita vko 22 May 2020 18: 50 New
      • 23
      • 6
      +17
      Quote: Hagen
      How to share secrets with such a "brother"

      Lukashenko has more than once sold secret technologies abroad, according to the Russian Foreign Ministry. For example, in 2006, he sold to China extremely sensitive to Russian security technologies and algorithms for air defense control systems, which were in service in most units. And Lukashenko’s response to the protest of the Russian Foreign Ministry was far from friendly or allied. A similar situation was with the supply of weapons and technology to many other countries. Moreover, if Russian officials prefer to take bribes for arms supplies, then Lukashenko practically openly kicks off officials from other countries just to squeeze Russia on the arms market. In particular, in 2011, the project for modernizing the ACS of the Navy of Kazakhstan was intercepted in this way, where the rollback to Nazarbayev’s representatives amounted to more than 50% and amounted to tens of $ million.
  • NEXUS 22 May 2020 17: 46 New
    • 30
    • 6
    +24
    Quote: AzDefence2020
    What about fraternal bonds?

    And what about the story of Motor Sich, when our corvettes and frigates were left without power plants? Why again dance on this rake then?
    1. Avior 22 May 2020 17: 56 New
      • 7
      • 13
      -6
      Motor sich makes aircraft engines generally.
      1. Lara Croft 22 May 2020 18: 50 New
        • 9
        • 1
        +8
        Quote: Avior
        Motor sich makes aircraft engines generally.

        Actually, he brought an analogy ...
    2. Lopatov 22 May 2020 18: 23 New
      • 23
      • 19
      +4
      Quote: NEXUS
      And what about the story of Motor Sich, when our corvettes and frigates were left without power plants? Why again dance on this rake then?

      Is there such a situation?
      They just asked for a testing ground. Weapons for your own army. They do not have their own at such ranges.
      And one prominent Russian military leader and leader decided to petty them finely. Resentments gnaw him .... And he puts these insults above the interests of Russia

      They will solve the problem. But the sediment will remain ...
      1. Antokha 22 May 2020 18: 39 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        And one prominent Russian commander and leader

        Is that the one who drives with sticks? Where does the information about who this military leader comes from?
        1. Lopatov 22 May 2020 18: 41 New
          • 11
          • 15
          -4
          And who else manages the Russian military training grounds?
          Unless Putin ... But for him such petty dirty tricks are not peculiar.
          1. Antokha 22 May 2020 18: 49 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Unless Putin ... But for him such petty dirty tricks are not peculiar.

            Well, since it’s not peculiar, and it is necessary to understand not at the level of the head of state, but at the level of officials of the Ministry of Defense of both countries in a working order.
            1. Lopatov 22 May 2020 19: 11 New
              • 10
              • 14
              -4
              Quote: Anton
              and at the level of officials of the Ministry of Defense of both countries in working order.

              Belarusians do not need this. They will agree with the Chinese again.
              But we must understand it.
              And the initiator send sew mittens. By article 275
      2. Lara Croft 22 May 2020 19: 15 New
        • 17
        • 5
        +12
        Quote: Spade
        They just asked for a testing ground. Weapons for your own army. They do not have their own at such ranges.

        Poor "orphans" (regular).
        The Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus once agreed that the Russian Federation does not pay for its military facilities on the territory of the Republic of Belarus, but instead writes off the RB “lard” for gas and provides a landfill for air defense forces in the Astrakhan steppes for the air defense forces of the Republic of Belarus, and a lease agreement is about to end (in summer ) and then Old Man remembered and told the public that, in view of their "modesty" and "clogging," the orphans had never asked the Russian Federation for money to rent a radar near Baranovichi and the Russian Navy in Vileika ...
        Now they’re offended that they can’t allocate a place for the Russian Federation in Kapustin Yar for “them” (the Belarusian tractor and Chinese launchers and missiles) ... rocket artillery ...
        1. Lopatov 22 May 2020 19: 19 New
          • 13
          • 15
          -2
          Quote: Lara Croft
          Now they’re offended that they can’t allocate a place for the Russian Federation in Kapustin Yar for “them” (the Belarusian tractor and Chinese launchers and missiles) ... rocket artillery ...

          Well yes..
          Here, for example, the Americans with great pleasure would provide. And even money was allocated for travel. Because for them, a rocket created using Chinese technology is very, very interesting.
          But we are not interested. We are all-knowing, and are ahead of them so much that we still have no analogue.
        2. Lopatov 22 May 2020 19: 22 New
          • 8
          • 7
          +1
          Quote: Lara Croft
          and provides a ground for air defense forces of the Republic of Belarus for the air defense forces in the Astrakhan steppes,

          This is a completely different topic. Unified regional air defense system of Russia and Belarus. And separate agreements that are in no way connected with two Russian military bases in Belarus
          1. Lara Croft 22 May 2020 19: 30 New
            • 5
            • 3
            +2
            Quote: Spade
            Quote: Lara Croft
            and provides a ground for air defense forces of the Republic of Belarus for the air defense forces in the Astrakhan steppes,

            This is a completely different topic. Unified regional air defense system of Russia and Belarus. And separate agreements that are in no way connected with two Russian military bases in Belarus

            It is connected .... There are two Agreements between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus on our military facilities and the conditions for their presence there read at your leisure ...
            Both military institutions are not endowed with the status of military bases. On their territory there is no lethal weapon. "These are technical facilities that are engaged in reconnaissance, radar and communications," experts say, referring to "Agreement on the use and maintenance of the Vileyka radio station" и "Agreement on the completion of the construction and maintenance of the Baranavichy site of the missile attack warning system".

            https://thinktanks.by/publication/2017/09/07/skolko-rossiyskih-voennyh-obektov-na-territorii-belarusi.html
            Belarus handed over the infrastructure, real estate and land plots on which the facilities are located to the Russians for 25 years free of charge without paying for communication channels and "without levying all types of taxes, except taxes related to economic activity." However, according to RIA Novosti, "not a single tax is levied in the local budget of Belarus." In exchange for an agreement on a free lease, Russia wrote off the $ 900 million debt to the Belarusian side for energy resources and pledged to provide its military training grounds for training firing and information on the space and rocket situation free of charge.

            see there
            1. Lopatov 22 May 2020 19: 38 New
              • 8
              • 5
              +3
              Quote: Lara Croft
              In exchange for an agreement on a free lease, Russia wrote off the $ 900 million debt to the Belarusian side for energy resources and pledged to provide its military training grounds for training firing and information on the space and rocket situation free of charge.

              This is so "experts" RIA Novosti believe.
              In fact, there is nothing of the kind in the agreements: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901796828

              And air defense workers work here with this agreement http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902217225
              1. Lara Croft 22 May 2020 20: 51 New
                • 6
                • 4
                +2
                Quote: Spade
                Quote: Lara Croft
                In exchange for an agreement on a free lease, Russia wrote off the $ 900 million debt to the Belarusian side for energy resources and pledged to provide its military training grounds for training firing and information on the space and rocket situation free of charge.

                This is so "experts" RIA Novosti believe.
                In fact, there is nothing of the kind in the agreements: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901796828

                And air defense workers work here with this agreement http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902217225

                What do you show me the Agreement on the regional air defense group if I am talking about the status and conditions of the location of our military facilities in the Republic of Belarus, or do you not see the difference?
      3. D16
        D16 22 May 2020 19: 57 New
        • 7
        • 5
        +2
        They just asked for a testing ground. Weapons for your own army. They do not have their own at such ranges.

        Most likely the time of the training ground is scheduled and for the sake of missiles Lukashenko no one wants to break the order.
        And he puts these insults above the interests of Russia

        The interests of Russia are to prioritize the interests of Belarus?
        They will solve the problem.

        In-in. Let the Poles train laughing .
        1. Lopatov 22 May 2020 20: 02 New
          • 6
          • 5
          +1
          Quote: D16
          Most likely the time of the landfill is scheduled

          laughing

          Quote: D16
          The interests of Russia are to prioritize the interests of Belarus?

          To learn as much as possible about Chinese technology.
          1. D16
            D16 22 May 2020 20: 24 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            And the Belarusians, who have given obligations to the Chinese side, will want to share them?
      4. Boris Chernikov 23 May 2020 00: 29 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        for free? Yes, I suppose we should provide delivery and testing ... yeah, how come ... let them pay the full price
      5. Alex Justice 23 May 2020 09: 48 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        They just asked for a testing ground. Weapons for your own army. They do not have their own at such ranges.
        And one prominent Russian military leader and leader decided to petty them finely. Resentments gnaw him .... And he puts these insults above the interests of Russia

        And if tomorrow these missiles are aimed at Russia, how did this happen to Ukraine?
    3. Altona 24 May 2020 11: 49 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: NEXUS
      And what about the story of Motor Sich, when our corvettes and frigates were left without power plants?

      --------------------
      This is you "Zorya" had in mind.
  • Cyril G ... 22 May 2020 17: 51 New
    • 30
    • 6
    +24
    Does Lukashenko have sclerosis or something? I forgot how I sent Russia to provide an air base on the territory of the Republic of Belarus and deploy a Su-27cm squadron of the Russian Air Force ...
    1. Lopatov 22 May 2020 18: 11 New
      • 12
      • 15
      -3
      Quote: Cyril G ...
      Forgot go and sent Russia

      In fact, he did not send Russia, but one talkative leader. Who decided for some reason just before the election to run ahead of the engine.
      When the question was “Do the foreigners recognize the election” on the agenda, some could not keep their mouths shut.
    2. Lara Croft 22 May 2020 19: 18 New
      • 9
      • 5
      +4
      Quote: Cyril G ...
      Does Lukashenko have sclerosis or something? I forgot how I sent Russia to provide an air base on the territory of the Republic of Belarus and deploy a Su-27cm squadron of the Russian Air Force ...

      Thanks God. To place your IAP to protect the territory of your "ally", which does not recognize the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation, is the height of idiocy ...
  • Non liberoid Russian 23 May 2020 03: 46 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    What are you talking about ? lukoshenko and bonds are just letters on paper
  • Enemy 23 May 2020 09: 02 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Byalorus friends for money only
    1. BYCHARA 23 May 2020 09: 05 New
      • 4
      • 6
      -2
      Quote: Enemy
      Byalorus friends for money only

      Such an opinion is constantly hammered into us in Russia by “our media” and almost every day .. What do you think for what?
  • ppgt90 23 May 2020 18: 38 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Well, we’ve already seen enough of “fraternal bonds.” Enough.
  • Uncle Izya 22 May 2020 17: 35 New
    • 12
    • 1
    +11
    And tomorrow he will ask the Volga radar station and the connection in Vileyka for the exit, and then what?
    1. Sky strike fighter 22 May 2020 17: 37 New
      • 7
      • 5
      +2
      Quote: Uncle Izya
      And tomorrow he will ask the Volga radar station and the connection in Vileyka for the exit, and then what?

      There has already been talk that we don’t really need bases in Belarus. Why would this be? request recourse
      The possible closure of two military facilities in Belarus, working in the interests of Russia, in the event official Minsk refuses to extend their work amid cooling relations with Moscow, will not fundamentally affect Russia's defense capability.


      “The communication center is not the only one. They are very effective for communication with submarines. That is, the loss of the Belarusian is not a tragedy. The radar there is good, overseas. But now everyone is blocking the new radars that Russia produces in series. They are prefabricated and much cheaper.

      They are already located in Leningrad and in the Kaliningrad region. We experienced this in Ukraine during the time of Yanukovych, when our radars were disassembled, stolen, and stolen. Now another concept has been adopted, ”said Suzdaltsev.

      We also recall that the ultra-long-range radio station in Vileyka is used to provide communications in the North Atlantic and the North Sea, to communicate with deeply submerged submarines and surface ships, and to transmit combat control signals for the use of forces and means.

      The missile launch early warning station (Separate Radio Engineering Center, ORTU) in the town of Gantsevichi (Brest Region) performs the tasks of detecting ballistic missiles, space objects and controlling the patrol areas of NATO submarines in the North Atlantic and the Norwegian Sea.

      The fate of the facilities is used by Minsk for bidding with Moscow, previously stated reserve colonel Vladimir Trukhan, a member of the working group on the creation of the Russian regional group of troops (forces) in Belarus

      “Conversations are ongoing. In Belarus, the theme is now accelerating: we do not need a Russian military presence. Like, “if anything, they’ll hit us,” Trukhan said.

      https://m.politnavigator.net/opyt-ukrainy-uchtjon-rossiya-gotova-k-vozmozhnomu-zakrytiyu-voennykh-obektov-v-belorussii.html
      1. Uncle Izya 22 May 2020 19: 05 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        C'mon talk talk, and 5000 km of view also missile guidance
  • avg
    avg 22 May 2020 19: 54 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    Lukashenko outraged by Russia's refusal to conduct joint development of a rocket for MLRS

    And why is it necessary to develop something with us? We have "no mind, no money." request
  • svp67 22 May 2020 17: 24 New
    • 21
    • 6
    +15
    But in general, has Lukashenko been pleased with Russia lately?
    1. Mavrikiy 22 May 2020 17: 29 New
      • 15
      • 14
      +1
      Quote: svp67
      But in general, has Lukashenko been pleased with Russia lately?

      And in everything, it’s boring ..... American oil sucks, and it’s expensive, an infection. Mood and spoils. On gas graters, multiaxial cars hobbled, and there is no one else to sell and so on. From the Ruins takes an example.
      1. Uncle Izya 22 May 2020 19: 06 New
        • 7
        • 10
        -3
        You can’t please, it’s kind of sucks Russian oil, they buy who sells
        1. Mavrikiy 23 May 2020 06: 41 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Quote: Uncle Izya
          You can’t please, it’s kind of sucks Russian oil, they buy who sells

          Do not be stupid. Purchases from the United States at a price higher than what we offer.
      2. bald 23 May 2020 01: 55 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I will not correct much, sorry, "not recently, since the union."
    2. Yes father for any opportunity clings that would kick the older brother.
      1. AnderS 25 May 2020 19: 31 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Yes father for any opportunity clings that would kick the older brother.

        And the "elder brother" is something different in this regard?
        1. It’s different ... I didn’t do beautiful things with my sister-neighbor ...
    3. Adimius38 22 May 2020 17: 33 New
      • 17
      • 17
      0
      but is there really something to be pleased with))) the whole story with a union state from the very beginning looks like some kind of fight, where one with a club and the other without a club. I do not see any normal allied relations, for any reason, squabbles and often the fault in this in the Russian Federation.
      1. Lara Croft 22 May 2020 19: 54 New
        • 9
        • 5
        +4
        Quote: Adimius38
        but is there something to be satisfied with)))

        Well, for starters, Belarus is the largest debtor of the Russian Federation for loans ....
        The Russian Federation invests by direct investment in the economy of the Republic of Belarus (allocation of a loan for the construction of nuclear power plants), purchases of MZKT products (without the Russian Federation, the said enterprise would share the fate of the same enterprise in Kurgan) .. it purchases including as part of the defense order. other products from the enterprises of the military-industrial complex of the Republic of Belarus ...
        Compared even with the CIS and EAC countries, Belarus has more benefits in the trade market for the provision of services in the Russian Federation, citizens of the Republic of Belarus on the labor market of the Russian Federation have more rights than a citizen of any state ... etc.
        the whole story with a union state from the very beginning looks like some kind of fight, where one with a club and the other without a club.

        Common currency - Old Man wanted to have a printing press for money too ... he was sent with this request to an absurd and no common currency ...
        General migration policy - Old Man one day, without asking the Russian Federation for advice, canceled the visa regime for 80 states .... citizens who can freely cross the Russian border from Belarus, because there is no customs and border guards between Belarus and the Russian Federation ....
        Customs and trade policy - Old Man still claims that oysters and lobsters supplied from Belarus to the Russian Federation are of local origin ... etc. etc.
        I do not see any normal allied relations

        I also....
        often blame for this in the Russian Federation

        For more details, you can ...?
        1. Adimius38 22 May 2020 20: 02 New
          • 8
          • 16
          -8
          don’t need Lalya Thrall, the Russian Federation purchases military-industrial complex products in the Republic of Belarus, because these products are essential for the RF Armed Forces, for the defense industry of the Russian Federation, the list of products is quite large, from optical-electronic base to heavy equipment that Belarusians can do.
          1. Lara Croft 22 May 2020 20: 47 New
            • 9
            • 6
            +3
            Quote: Adimius38
            don’t need Lala Thrall La,

            You are sick, get treated, go to the hospital ....
            The Russian Federation purchases military-industrial complex products in the Republic of Belarus, because these products are essential for the RF Armed Forces, for the defense industry of the Russian Federation, the list of products is quite large, from optical-electronic base to heavy equipment

            I’m saying that apart from the Russian Federation, nobody needs all of the above ... or does the Republic of Belarus give away all of the above for free, as a faithful ally?
            which Belarusians know how to do.

            "Ancient Sumerians" until recently, too much that knew how to do ... the need has now forced the Russian Federation to do it ....
          2. Vadim237 22 May 2020 21: 00 New
            • 6
            • 5
            +1
            Heavy equipment - MZKT will soon be replaced by BAZs and KAMAZs in the Russian Armed Forces.
        2. Soviet Union 22 May 2020 21: 47 New
          • 2
          • 7
          -5
          Freely cross the border .... bullshit.
          If only they would try ... they require a passport ... Belarusian .. go. and if not .. will find out .. and turn.
          1. Aviator_ 22 May 2020 22: 55 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            I went. And more than once. Nothing like the requirement of a Belarusian passport. So the "bullshit"
      2. BYCHARA 23 May 2020 09: 15 New
        • 3
        • 6
        -3
        Quote: Adimius38
        but is there really something to be pleased with))) the whole story with a union state from the very beginning looks like some kind of fight, where one with a club and the other without a club. I do not see any normal allied relations, for any reason, squabbles and often the fault in this in the Russian Federation.

        They wrote it right and I would like to correct you not the fault of Russia, namely, “our media”, almost every day there is a headline and it’s clear that the Belarusians and I are simply pitted and purposefully .. Lukashenko is certainly not a diplomat and his language is sharp .. And the quotes from his speeches pulled out zhurnalyugi and arrange bullying .. hi And here they pick up .. Not casual all this!
      3. ppgt90 23 May 2020 18: 45 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Yes, no one Belarusians pulled anywhere and does not pull. The scream of Lukashenko has not ceased for more than a dozen years. Do not like it, do not go. Who is calling Lukashenko to the Kremlin, to Russia? Yes, no one. Zadolbal with forever outstretched hand. Give it, give it. Pay off your debts and bring down wherever you want. Who needs such allies - beggars? Belarus has not forgotten how much Russia owes?
    4. Ross xnumx 22 May 2020 19: 14 New
      • 8
      • 9
      -1
      Quote: svp67
      But in general, has Lukashenko been pleased with Russia lately?

      Recently? The country of Russia, its people or the Russian authorities? And you, you personally, what are you happy with? What good did the Russian government provide you? Is it good that the shells in the yard are not torn?
      But, in general, Lukashenko must be punched. Then already in the world there will not be a single Slavic country where the government will welcome the nullified and self-isolated.
    5. krops777 23 May 2020 08: 31 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      But in general, has Lukashenko been pleased with Russia lately?


      Especially when he comes to some factory and starts the same song, about how he does not live well with his Russian brother, he is understood with all his heart and they are with all his hopes.
  • Knell wardenheart 22 May 2020 17: 26 New
    • 5
    • 5
    0
    Did it really finally happen that an ally could become a competitor?)
    1. Ded_Mazay 23 May 2020 09: 01 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      He will not become a competitor. The scope is not the same. But click on .... - how else.
  • LAWNER 22 May 2020 17: 28 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Without even reading, I remembered the Belorussian Polonaise. Wrote and flashed
  • Thrifty 22 May 2020 17: 30 New
    • 13
    • 7
    +6
    For Lukashenko’s Victory Parade held on May 9, of course, thanks again, but you need to firmly decide — Is Russia really an ally, or just a cash cow? ??
    1. alien 22 May 2020 19: 22 New
      • 12
      • 3
      +9
      Quote: Thrifty
      For Lukashenko’s Victory Parade held on May 9, of course, thanks again, but you need to firmly decide — Is Russia really an ally, or just a cash cow? ??

      “Most of us are accustomed to perceiving Belarus as such a reserve of modernized socialism and a bulwark of struggle against the corruptive influence of the West. However it is - ILLUSION.
      <...> With American money, a system of continuous brainwashing of the population and a strategic task of all these efforts - TRANSFORMATION of Belarusians into a screeching Russophobe HERD.


      <...> But But father has his own strategy. Playing the card of the evil and greedy Moscow, firstly, he relieves himself of responsibility for the growing socio-economic problems in Belarus. After all, now, as in Ukraine, the Russians are to blame for everything ...
      <...> If the Americans go to Bularus in the same way as they went to Ukraine .......................... ”

      Andrew Vajra
      Why Belarus is doomed on 11.05.2020/78/XNUMX. (No. XNUMX)
      1. Lara Croft 22 May 2020 19: 59 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Quote: Alien
        Quote: Thrifty
        For Lukashenko’s Victory Parade held on May 9, of course, thanks again, but you need to firmly decide — Is Russia really an ally, or just a cash cow? ??

        “Most of us are accustomed to perceiving Belarus as such a reserve of modernized socialism and a bulwark of struggle against the corruptive influence of the West. However it is - ILLUSION.
        <...> With American money, a system of continuous brainwashing of the population and a strategic task of all these efforts - TRANSFORMATION of Belarusians into a screeching Russophobe HERD.


        <...> But But father has his own strategy. Playing the card of the evil and greedy Moscow, firstly, he relieves himself of responsibility for the growing socio-economic problems in Belarus. After all, now, as in Ukraine, the Russians are to blame for everything ...
        <...> If the Americans go to Bularus in the same way as they went to Ukraine .......................... ”

        Andrew Vajra
        Why Belarus is doomed on 11.05.2020/78/XNUMX. (No. XNUMX)

        I completely agree with you, it can be clearly seen in the video to which you gave a link
        Andrew Vajra
        Why Belarus is doomed on 11.05.2020/78/XNUMX. (No. XNUMX)
        1. alien 22 May 2020 20: 28 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Thanks, corrected the link.
  • KVU-NSVD 22 May 2020 17: 30 New
    • 19
    • 14
    +5
    Is that true? What is the problem of helping an ally with polygons? Are there few polygons or are they painted for years to come? Actually grounded outrage this time ..
    1. svp67 22 May 2020 17: 36 New
      • 7
      • 2
      +5
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      What is the problem of helping an ally with polygons?

      Now? Quarantine problem
      1. KVU-NSVD 22 May 2020 17: 39 New
        • 5
        • 5
        0
        Quote: svp67
        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        What is the problem of helping an ally with polygons?

        Now? Quarantine problem

        I think he would hardly have been indignant if he had simply been asked to wait until the end of the quarantine measures, he was completely refused to see.
        1. svp67 22 May 2020 18: 30 New
          • 7
          • 1
          +6
          Quote: KVU-NSVD
          I think he would hardly have been indignant if he had simply been asked to wait until the end of the quarantine measures, he was completely refused to see.

          Well, that may be so. But what about questions about the price of gas? While the gas price for Belarus was lower than the pan-European one, he was silent in Germany, but as soon as the price fell there, he immediately spoke about the injustice on the part of Russia. And demanded to lower the price. But why was he silent when their price was lower and did not ask to increase it? So here, I now believe little Lukashenko, he began to play some kind of his game ...
      2. Stirbjorn 22 May 2020 18: 57 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Quote: svp67
        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        What is the problem of helping an ally with polygons?

        Now? Quarantine problem

        And at the Belarusian NPP, quarantine does not interfere with the shipment of equipment
        1. svp67 22 May 2020 19: 06 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: Stirbjorn
          And at the Belarusian NPP, quarantine does not interfere with the shipment of equipment

          Who knows. in any case, here the claims were to specialists who came from Murmansk, they brought the coronavirus to them ...
      3. Uncle Izya 22 May 2020 19: 09 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        He had in mind before quarantine, they had been tested in China for a couple of years, but Lukas didn’t worry about Belarusians for his own power. More than Stalin, Brezhnev already grew on the throne with moss
    2. Uncle Izya 22 May 2020 17: 36 New
      • 7
      • 7
      0
      In power, the liberals have no profit
    3. K-612-O 22 May 2020 17: 55 New
      • 20
      • 5
      +15
      Well, when did they develop this rocket and ran to the Chinese comrades, and now give a training ground for the Chinese rocket? You can also recall kidalovo from the MZKT, we did not sell the plant to us, and all the documentation was leaked to China. And how after this? The Chinese armored cars are driving in the parade, but what did the Tigers not please?
      1. KVU-NSVD 22 May 2020 18: 05 New
        • 9
        • 13
        -4
        Quote: K-612-O
        Well, when did they develop this rocket and ran to the Chinese comrades, and now give a training ground for the Chinese rocket? You can also recall kidalovo from the MZKT, we did not sell the plant to us, and all the documentation was leaked to China. And how after this? The Chinese armored cars are driving in the parade, but what did the Tigers not please?

        Their factory is their right. Their army is their right. Polonaises are also not aimed at us, and their presence in Belarus is only a plus - we still do not have systems with such characteristics. And extra insults with an ally is a bad path, especially insults due to such trifles
        1. Kathernik 22 May 2020 18: 20 New
          • 16
          • 3
          +13
          Our landfill is our right ......
          1. KVU-NSVD 22 May 2020 18: 25 New
            • 9
            • 10
            -1
            It is one thing to independently decide on matters of national importance, it is another thing to refuse an ally in a request that is important to him and unprincipled for us.
        2. KCA
          KCA 22 May 2020 18: 26 New
          • 13
          • 2
          +11
          Now he will drive the Polonaise 300km away, and sell it to the fraternal Ukraine as easy as we need it? Our landfill is our right, we ourselves rent a landfill in Kazakhstan
          1. KVU-NSVD 22 May 2020 18: 30 New
            • 4
            • 7
            -3
            Quote: KCA
            Now he will drive the Polonaise 300km away, and sell it to the fraternal Ukraine as easy as we need it? Our landfill is our right, we ourselves rent a landfill in Kazakhstan

            We need landfills in Kazakhstan constantly, and not one-time - that's why we keep them in long-term leases. All tired of arguing - to the question of the reasons for the refusal, so no intelligible versions even brought
          2. V.I.P. 22 May 2020 18: 44 New
            • 3
            • 3
            0
            Ukraine itself can buy from China. Moreover, they have MLRS with a range of 450 km. Anyway, the Chinese have a bunch of MLRS with different ranges. This Belarusians bought 200 km cheaper. Could buy at 350 ..
        3. Antokha 22 May 2020 18: 43 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Their factory is their right. Their army is their right

          Our training ground, our right to refuse to use it. Our industry, its decision to cooperate with Belarusians (who are going to bow to the Chinese now) or not.
        4. K-612-O 22 May 2020 19: 14 New
          • 6
          • 2
          +4
          These little things will be pulled by another hundred million, the costs of preparing and conducting tests at the test site. And about what we don’t have: IskanderM and IskanderK. Since the Polonaise is already an OTRK, and not an MLRS, and the sense of a non-tactical missile with a high probability of being shot down and a relatively small warhead is doubtful.
          And about your own, not ours: do we have an allied state? So then, behind the ally’s back, to sell anything to anyone without getting into it, and not only to China
        5. Non liberoid Russian 23 May 2020 04: 01 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Their factory is their right. Their army is their right.
          our polygons are our right, more questions, or will you whine further why did you not provide a pseudo-union polygon?
          1. KVU-NSVD 23 May 2020 09: 10 New
            • 2
            • 3
            -1
            Quote: Not a liberoid Russian
            or you will whine further

            You boor, at a meeting for such a tone of teeth would be croaked through Adam's apple.
            1. Non liberoid Russian 23 May 2020 15: 33 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              well good luck fellow , ass only from the couch lift yes leave the kitchenette
      2. Lopatov 22 May 2020 18: 14 New
        • 11
        • 7
        +4
        Quote: K-612-O
        Well, when they developed this rocket they ran to the Chinese comrades

        Everything is very simple: then the Belarusians were refused with the Iskanders and they began to rivet something long-range with the Chinese.
        And it’s okay to fulfill our promise - “not a single installation until the complete re-equipment of the RF Armed Forces”. They put the "Iskanders" of Armenia.
        1. K-612-O 22 May 2020 19: 39 New
          • 5
          • 3
          +2
          They didn’t refuse, father refused to post ours, but he didn’t even stutter about purchases. And do not forget that Iskander is still a carrier of nuclear weapons.
      3. Uncle Izya 22 May 2020 19: 03 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        There were tigers and their local volatas
      4. Adimius38 22 May 2020 19: 58 New
        • 9
        • 11
        -2
        what slow-witted you are, and the Belarusians ran to the Chinese because the Slavic brother put down bricks, in fact, everything that Belarusians don’t offer is put in wheels. Any offers are met with hostility and with a big creak, resentment and squabble. Of course, it’s easier to deal with the Chinese, you don’t have to crawl and beg for them, and tolerate humiliation. The Chinese have a business approach, they help, finance, of course, have their own benefits in this. For that matter, China is making huge investments in Belarus, this is a huge number of joint projects. On the other hand, oil contracts are concluded with the United States, but this is not much, but a bad bell for the Russian Federation. In this situation, I see no prospects for the development of allied relations and not Belarusians are to blame. God grant that the Russian Federation does not lose Belarus at all as an ally, and this blow will be worse than the loss of Ukraine
        1. Cyril G ... 22 May 2020 20: 15 New
          • 9
          • 4
          +5
          He is already 10-12 years old as not a de facto ally. Already, citizens of the Russian Federation were issued upon request to the west ....
        2. Sergey269 23 May 2020 08: 21 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Resentment Lukashenko - FARS! He is well aware that weapons technology is much more expensive than weapons themselves. Joint production of missiles, a priori, implies the transfer of Russian technologies (which are secret, of national importance) to the not always adequate Brother. And where are the guarantees that in the near future, these technologies will end up in completely “non-fraternal countries”? China delivered missiles to Belarus? Put! Not for free, of course ... But, the technology of their production? So Lukashenko is rushing about, and to eat a fish and not to choke on a bone. Something is in no hurry to share with us developments on the same MZKT. You can discuss for a long time on this topic, but cooperation should be trustworthy, mutually beneficial. Buy Russian goods, sell yours, just do not speculate with the “brotherhood of peoples”! Old Man acts on the principle - "Promise does not mean to marry", and, all the time of his reign. Personally, I have nothing against him, he reminds me of the chairman of the collective farm from the film "Kuban Cossacks". Only now the times are somewhat different.
    4. avg
      avg 22 May 2020 20: 08 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      Is that true? What is the problem of helping ally with polygons

      Yes, the ally has a problem, where is he? Aw! Well, at least once, he supported something, but at least he said thanks. It dawned on us that if we hadn’t succeeded, we were already rejoicing. Are you sure that this rocket will not be in the country tomorrow? Me not.
    5. Lara Croft 22 May 2020 20: 12 New
      • 8
      • 3
      +5
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      What is the problem of helping an ally with polygons?

      There is such a book, the Budget Code of the Russian Federation, everything is written there, including and about unplanned expenses ...
      As for the ally ... The Republic of Belarus does not recognize that Crimea and Sevastopol are part of the Russian Federation, so it is not an ally, but a "partner" like the United States and the EU ...
      Little polygons

      The main missile range for testing the MLRS and the OTRK is one in fact in the Kapustin Yar ...
      Actually grounded outrage this time ..

      What are the reasons for the indignation that the freebies were refused?
      I’ve never heard how much the Russian Federation is from any country in the world, incl. from the CIS countries, I got something for free ... maybe remind ...?
    6. krops777 23 May 2020 08: 38 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Is that true? What is the problem of helping an ally with polygons?


      Yes, I think there is no problem here, as always sucked out of my finger, although it may just have pulled up this potato dad, how much mud can Russia be washed up with is the answer.
  • Vasyan1971 22 May 2020 17: 34 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    Nobody will just give us this weapon ...
    - said Lukashenko.

    Except Russia. Yeah.
    He said something about this lack of money and brains ...
    https://regnum.ru/news/polit/1952292.html
  • Andrei Nikolaevich 22 May 2020 17: 37 New
    • 11
    • 13
    -2
    Recognize the Crimea, get a training ground. Better yet, ask in the EU or the USA
    1. Driver 22 May 2020 17: 57 New
      • 14
      • 15
      -1
      He asks, one day you wake up-and if there isn’t her Belarus, then she’s in the EU and NATO ...
      1. Retvizan 8 22 May 2020 18: 18 New
        • 14
        • 4
        +10
        Well, then negotiate-Belarus in the EU and NATO ....
        And the shaft of its products goes to
        European markets ?!
        European and Belarusian enterprises work together ?!
        And are there American bases on its territory ?!
        Europe pumps oil and gas to Belarus at discounts ?!
        There is no end to Western investment ?!
        And of course, the IMF does not take loans from the IMF to support its pants ?!
        May we already have enough tales to tell about New Vasyuki?
      2. Hagalaz 22 May 2020 18: 58 New
        • 5
        • 3
        +2
        Ukraine, too, was fed and fed with concessions, but no, it did not help. So in the fools they remained, at their own expense.
      3. Lara Croft 22 May 2020 20: 28 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: Fahrer
        He asks, one day you wake up-and if there isn’t her Belarus, then she’s in the EU and NATO ...

        Not all areas only .... laughing
      4. Adimius38 23 May 2020 12: 15 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        100% only urry patriots can not explain
  • mark2 22 May 2020 17: 38 New
    • 8
    • 8
    0
    If you give everyone, the bed will fall apart. I'm talking about the landfill
    Why dad rocket? Against whom is he arming himself. Is it not about our soul? Now let him put his Oginsky at one border and launch him in the opposite direction. Dimensions of the country allow. And if they don’t allow it, then all the more so for him there is no need.
    1. Andrei Nikolaevich 22 May 2020 17: 45 New
      • 13
      • 7
      +6
      Let Chubatky ask for help. Of course, I understand that a politician must be flexible, but not so much about ....... oh, like this chairman of a collective farm. It is nonsense, not thinking about the consequences. Scatters and then licks all the crotch, the one to whom he scammed. Is he sane at all?
  • Gennady Fomkin 22 May 2020 17: 44 New
    • 5
    • 5
    0
    laughing Old Man in any way with an oak tree collapsed. Pennies hde?
  • Pug
    Pug 22 May 2020 17: 46 New
    • 14
    • 16
    -2
    Well, Old Man, hold on !!! Now you will be laid out ..)))
    Brothers, do not be offended, this is not the opinion of Russians in Russia! ..
    You yourself know who needs this bullying ..
    I don’t know how to protect you from these cries, etc.
    Well, maybe this will help?

    The whole song talks about it .. !!!! Hold on brothers ..
    1. Andrei Nikolaevich 22 May 2020 18: 55 New
      • 7
      • 7
      0
      You yourself know who needs this bullying ..
      Where did you see the "bullying" here? People express their opinions. I am not against the fact that Belarusians are brotherly people. The people are fraternal, but the government chooses - obviously NOT fraternal.
  • Zaurbek 22 May 2020 17: 47 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    They can, let them do it. Then they will calmly trade.
  • Radius 22 May 2020 17: 53 New
    • 9
    • 8
    +1
    There is always a chance to use Russian landfills: just hold a referendum in Belarus and become part of the Russian Federation.
    1. Pug
      Pug 22 May 2020 17: 58 New
      • 11
      • 14
      -3
      Quote: Radius
      There is always a chance to use Russian landfills: just hold a referendum in Belarus and become part of the Russian Federation.

      If only Lukashenko becomes the head of Russia! ! There were Georgians, Ukrainians. Jews in the 90s and 2000s .. Then I agree!
      I am for such a referendum !!!! And to bring the troops into full combat readiness! Just in case .. soldier
      Old Man is cool with you .. many will start to run right away))))
      The main thing is that they are in the same panties draped .. (sure to check the panties)))
      1. Hagen 22 May 2020 18: 17 New
        • 18
        • 10
        +8
        Quote: Pug
        Old Man is cool with you .. many will start to run right away))))

        Old Man on the level of thinking and behavior does not attract a serious political leader. Sweeps his tongue like a broom. Throws abusive epithets in our direction for the sake of a red word and "cool" PR. He drops his level to the collective farm. We don’t need such a head.
        1. Andrei Nikolaevich 22 May 2020 18: 53 New
          • 6
          • 5
          +1
          Old Man on the level of thinking and behavior does not attract a serious political leader. Sweeps his tongue like a broom. Throws abusive epithets in our direction for the sake of a red word and "cool" PR. He drops his level to the collective farm. We don’t need such a head.
          that's for sure.
          1. D16
            D16 22 May 2020 22: 05 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            He drops his level to the collective farm. We don’t need such a head.

            Why write the same thing with two nicknames? Post-wage payment? laughing
      2. lelik613 22 May 2020 18: 32 New
        • 5
        • 6
        -1
        Lukashenko-Zhirinovsky without a muzzle.
  • qobnvmog 22 May 2020 18: 13 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Not with Russia, so with Ukraine.
  • demchuk.ig 22 May 2020 18: 16 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    From this "Polonaise", the father is only the chassis.
  • Operator 22 May 2020 18: 18 New
    • 7
    • 10
    -3
    Where a horse with a hoof, there and Rygorych cancer (American litter) with a claw.
  • Alexfly 22 May 2020 18: 35 New
    • 4
    • 7
    -3
    Well, in vain, trials, trials, but interesting ideas could have been fucked ... Or is it just that everything is the same with us ???
    1. Nicholas 23 May 2020 22: 34 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Chinese missiles are used by Jeepies. Our-Glonass and the system of adjusting and controlling the terrain, though our range is less, though there is an opinion. To shoot for 200 km, you need reliable reconnaissance, otherwise you’ll release the entire BC on rubber targets. So I asked Russian Grygorich system Escander. Says I will keep all the horns at gunpoint. And in the Russian airbase refused, voters will not understand him. if the Russian Air Force will be here. so he was also denied Escanders. Grygorich said they wouldn’t give weapons, we’ll do it ourselves. After 2 years we’ll have an analogue of Iskander. It’s already announced to the whole country that they have fulfilled the order and made the same weapons as in Russia, but admitted that the missiles Chinese 300 mm and hit as much as 450 km, and 2 years ago they tested and they already flew 218 km. He was bowing to the Chinese, and they deceived, so Grygorich wants to bring Polonaise in TTX close to Iskander i.e. at a distance of 450 km and there’s nothing new here. He wants to get out at the expense of someone. It doesn’t work, someone is to blame. They don’t want to give the training ground.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • strelokmira 22 May 2020 18: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It was reported that on Friday Lukashenko visited the Belarusian arms developer OKB TSP, where he was informed that Russia does not provide its military training grounds for testing the Belarusian missile. What Lukashenko reacted in a sharp form.

    Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko outraged by Russia's refusal to conduct joint development of missile weapons

    And where in the article about the joint development and development of which missile weapons exactly?
  • vkd.dvk 22 May 2020 19: 17 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    Develop (taking on 90% of the effort and expense), dividing the results in half, when we don’t have such a task .... We need not to deal with blackmail, but coordinate work plans. Do not want to - bow to China.
    1. strelokmira 22 May 2020 19: 19 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      what to develop then? )))
  • Sasha Minakov 22 May 2020 19: 22 New
    • 5
    • 8
    -3
    The mustachioed Russophobe completely flew off the coils. He will not be the second Yanyk. His Belarusians are crucified.
  • vkd.dvk 22 May 2020 19: 22 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    Quote: AlexFly
    Well, in vain, trials, trials, but interesting ideas could have been fucked ... Or is it just that everything is the same with us ???

    It’s good to borrow ideas from specialists who are much better than you in business. To drag on yourself those who are three steps lower is not equal cooperation. We have glands with similar parameters. And perhaps much more advanced.
    1. Alexfly 24 May 2020 10: 47 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Sometimes, in small things, interesting ideas are hidden or are born ... And just to deny - this is the lot of nihilists, I hope with them not along the way ...
  • vkd.dvk 22 May 2020 19: 26 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Quote: mark2
    If you give everyone, the bed will fall apart. I'm talking about the landfill
    Why dad rocket? Against whom is he arming himself. Is it not about our soul? Now let him put his Oginsky at one border and launch him in the opposite direction. Dimensions of the country allow. And if they don’t allow it, then all the more so for him there is no need.

    With our help, make and sell ukram. What is not clear?
  • vkd.dvk 22 May 2020 19: 32 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    Quote: KVU-NSVD
    Quote: K-612-O
    Well, when did they develop this rocket and ran to the Chinese comrades, and now give a training ground for the Chinese rocket? You can also recall kidalovo from the MZKT, we did not sell the plant to us, and all the documentation was leaked to China. And how after this? The Chinese armored cars are driving in the parade, but what did the Tigers not please?

    Their factory is their right. Their army is their right. Polonaises are also not aimed at us, and their presence in Belarus is only a plus - we still do not have systems with such characteristics. And extra insults with an ally is a bad path, especially insults due to such trifles

    In order not to grind rubbish, you need to know a lot. As I understand it, you do not work in the Foreign Ministry.
  • vkd.dvk 22 May 2020 19: 35 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Quote: AzDefence2020
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    Friendship, friendship, and tobaccos apart

    What about fraternal bonds? And also say southerners traders.

    Chatting in Berlin at a meeting with Merkel about four years ago (I don’t remember the exact date) that he would strangle Russia with a pipe. Brother, his mother .....
  • vkd.dvk 22 May 2020 19: 36 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Quote: strelokmira
    what to develop then? )))

    And the article from the beginning to read, not fate?
  • sanya 22 May 2020 19: 41 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    Well, then he will sell to Ukraine ...
    It’s not at all clear why Russia needs such allies
  • yfast 22 May 2020 20: 31 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    China can bow, Russia - no. The dad quickly forgot who supported him when the civilized world spread rot for the opposition. Well, China will definitely support it.
  • Gennady Fomkin 22 May 2020 20: 31 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Quote: Pug
    Well, Old Man, hold on !!! Now you will be laid out ..)))
    Brothers, do not be offended, this is not the opinion of Russians in Russia! ..
    You yourself know who needs this bullying ..
    I don’t know how to protect you from these cries, etc.
    Well, maybe this will help?

    The whole song talks about it .. !!!! Hold on brothers ..

    Tired already - The developers assured the President that by September the first prototype of the “XNUMX” should appear. To test this rocket, testing sites in China, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia are considered. laughing Again "Mustachioed Bulb": "the war is not ours"? Sometimes it’s awkward and unpleasant for his speech. Well, he lives in parallel reality. Upstairs has its own logic. But with this rocket ... B-b, already too much. what laughing
  • Gennady Fomkin 22 May 2020 20: 33 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    Judging by the persistence in creating the rocket, the "chief epidemiologist" of Belarus promised the rocket to the Arabs, and may have already received a certain advance. laughingHe’s ready to bow to the Chinese) Bulba in his pocket and let him saw a rocket in his waltz rhythm. Although it’s not very clear - 300 km range - it’s only in all the nearest neighbors and reaches belay
    1. Hermann 22 May 2020 20: 46 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The polonaise, which was tested by shooting in Belarus three hundred years ago three years ago, may now want to experience something more long-range.
      1. Nicholas 23 May 2020 21: 38 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Polonaise shot only 218 km. it was 2 years ago. and Grygorich announced that he was shooting at 450, and it started that Russia didn’t give him the Escandra, he asked, but they didn’t give them. I gave the command that we don’t need the Russians, we’ll do it ourselves. That's all about Polonaise and goes. they do not shoot like Iskander. The Chinese failed or again deceived Grygorich. So he decided at the expense of Russia to increase the range of Polonaise
      2. Nicholas 23 May 2020 21: 46 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        of the brand-new one in Belarus, only the Oriole-80 trunks, shoots with aviation NURs. According to some reports, the firing range is 3-4 km, according to others 4-5 km. The range is 6 km and not 70 mm.
  • Esaul 22 May 2020 20: 50 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Let me guess, Old Man asked me to test my rocket for free at our training ground without giving anything in return?
    1. Vadim237 22 May 2020 21: 06 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      It’s not so much with missiles in general with everything oil gas commodity circulation electricity pothole at the border loans - GIVE GIVE GIVE GIVE We demand a discount that is what it means to be friends with the collective farmer who is the governing state.
  • Gennady Fomkin 22 May 2020 21: 01 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    Quote: Herman
    The polonaise, which was tested by shooting in Belarus three hundred years ago three years ago, may now want to experience something more long-range.

    Who should be fired at? I don’t already know why Lukashenka has more thrift or foolishness.
  • vkd.dvk 22 May 2020 21: 28 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    Quote: Adimius38
    don’t need Lalya Thrall, the Russian Federation purchases military-industrial complex products in the Republic of Belarus, because these products are essential for the RF Armed Forces, for the defense industry of the Russian Federation, the list of products is quite large, from optical-electronic base to heavy equipment that Belarusians can do.

    Do not breach, since you don’t know.
    In some cases, Belarus is a competitor in the production of automotive and other engineering products. Reseller of Russian oil, bought at half price and supplying ukrofashistov. A crook selling Polish apples at one time. betraying Russia on every corner.
    1. Interlocutor 22 May 2020 21: 49 New
      • 0
      • 3
      -3
      wink
      betraying Russia on every corner


      Not on everyone, but through the corner.
  • DPN
    DPN 22 May 2020 21: 30 New
    • 7
    • 16
    -9
    In general, while Belarus is blocking Moscow from NATO and the United States. And not vice versa.
    1. Interlocutor 22 May 2020 21: 50 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      hi Chago ?????????????????
      1. Terenin 22 May 2020 22: 03 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Interlocutor
        hi Chago ?????????????????
        hi Well, do not come here You are in the interlocutors winked
        1. Interlocutor 23 May 2020 15: 08 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Be patient. Once switched to a person, then hurt.
          You stop talking about barriers ..... "Belarus is blocking (not even Russia) Moscow." If the adversary is needed, he will fly around Belarus ... But from stupid rulers, of all stripes, no one will protect Belarus
    2. Gennady Fomkin 22 May 2020 22: 07 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      Yes, something is true, quite often) something went wrong with this fantasy. laughing
    3. Boris Chernikov 23 May 2020 00: 33 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      funny joke)
    4. Esaul 25 May 2020 09: 12 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Yes of course! When the NATO nuclear missiles fly at us, Belarus will knock them all down to one with the help of its top-secret and irresistible missile defense system!
  • Boris Afinogenov 22 May 2020 21: 37 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    Guys, yes Lukashenko is the same Yanukovych. But he thinks that, damn it, smarter. But Viktor Fedorovich also thought that he was smart and cunning.

    All these "brothers" are used to having something to fuck from Russia, but just a little, what a problem - in the bushes.

    This is not very pleasing, but another pleases: in difficult times, brothers and their people really appear.


    Let them drop out. Only our people will remain.
    1. Terenin 22 May 2020 22: 05 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Boris Afinogenov
      Guys, yes Lukashenko is the same Yanukovych

      By the way, he did not recognize the Crimea as Russian ...
      1. Cyril G ... 23 May 2020 17: 55 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Here is such an ally and brother ...
  • APASUS 22 May 2020 22: 31 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Something ours outwitted themselves? You can really be aware of everything that Belarus produces, performance characteristics of missiles, weaknesses and strengths, analysis and even test it
  • Gennady Fomkin 22 May 2020 22: 43 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Earlier, Lukashenko wanted to build rockets with Ukraine. Here is what he said to Zelensky:

    This is not because we rattle weapons. We are working a lot on the development of the rocket industry in Belarus. We did not have such a production, but you have it. We are very interested in helping you with this. laughingHas Lisapedi learned to do? Something from Father is some obsessive thoughts about “cancer” and “on his knees”. Constantly inserts. A gray hair in a beard, a demon in a rib. laughing How does someone want to sell a bandustan?
  • vkd.dvk 22 May 2020 22: 54 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    Quote: DPN
    In general, while Belarus is blocking Moscow from NATO and the United States. And not vice versa.

    Himself not funny? Who can go to conquer territories? Through such an unreliable defender. Missiles fly through this patch of land. Old Man inviting NATO to its exercises last year. Demanding to close early warning radars.
    Just in the wake of the Baltic states. Such an ally is not necessary.
  • Pandiurin 23 May 2020 00: 03 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    In vain Lukashenko, again hysteria.
    MLRS, judging by the article, Lukashenko is Chinese.
    Perhaps it was the Chinese part of the rocket that was not allowed to go to the training ground, and since it is not possible to divide, there is no tolerance in general.
    Again, there is no trust in Lukashenko’s words, maybe there’s a completely different situation there, or in general everything was expelled from a finger.
  • bald 23 May 2020 01: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Voenka, and you on which side ?! I will say frankly - you sold out.
    1. bald 23 May 2020 01: 42 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      into three Soviet letters.
      1. bald 23 May 2020 01: 44 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And you will have to answer, at the highest, and mom will not help.
        1. bald 23 May 2020 02: 31 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          We are called sofas !!!, crap, but here on the military commissar there were people who changed tracks in the mud, in Afghanistan, in Chechnya, etc. and we will participate and at any moment we’ll go.
          1. al.cozeev 24 May 2020 13: 29 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Along Chechnya, there were Angola, Yugoslavia, Transnistria, Dagestan, Syria, and many visited Libya, Laos, Nagorno-Karabakh, an operation to force Georgia to peace. It's just that we are silent about this, since it is not customary to talk about it and write. And if I wrote a few words about this, then you are criticized for this, insults. How many new things have I learned about myself since 2017. Here is a little that they write and say to me. "" Killer "", "" Mercenary "", "So that you die," "" "And who asked you to save BESLAN in Beslan," "" ", instead of living and having fun, it risks life by following orders" "," "Why haven’t you been killed there? I would only be glad for that. "" And this is only part of what I have come across in the civilian life over the past three and a half years.
  • tolancop 23 May 2020 01: 32 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    They did the right thing, that they refused ... Something to the closest ally in the deployment of the air base was denied, and now "... what about us? ...". And with whom is Lukashenko going to fight with tactical missiles? And where does he have those that are? And how Ukraine supplies arms-silent.
    T.ch. our ally is clearly rotten and with his own hands to strengthen his military capabilities is utter stupidity.
    Interrupted.
  • tolancop 23 May 2020 01: 38 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: Spade
    ..... Just asked for a testing ground. Weapons for your own army. They do not have their own at such ranges. And one prominent Russian military leader and leader decided to petty them finely. Resentments gnaw him .... And he puts these insults above the interests of Russia ...

    What is the interest of Russia in the appearance of a poorly predictable neighbor of its own operational tactical missiles?
    Besides with OUR help? Do not explain?
  • Nikolaevich I 23 May 2020 03: 33 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Poor ... poor, thoroughly shot through Belarus! And she is still “rocking”! Is it worth it? Will it last for long? After all, if the “powerful people of this world" would like to be in vain, then the country, in the end, will have to "bean capitular" ...! And it is possible that it will be subject to unconditional surrender! Isn’t it better if Belarus “herself, herself ..” decides that it is time “now and voluntarily” to stumble on a stronger and bigger side than her ...?!
  • mmaxx 23 May 2020 04: 53 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    When should Russian Belarusians brothers. And when Belarusians should, we are an independent country. All logic Lukashenko.
    Now we will help the Old Man with missiles. And then he will sell them to Ukraine and so on and so forth.
  • 1536 23 May 2020 07: 09 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Why be indignant? It’s just that Russia doesn’t need a “Belarusian rocket”. Or you have to happily climb to hug that this comrade finally something from Belarus suggested in terms of cooperation in the industrial field? With the tests at the Russian training ground, I think, no problems. But the entrance is paid. Perhaps this is just another provocation in the hope of failure. The next call with the proposal to produce a "joint rocket" will be in Warsaw? They will understand, accept, feed and heat the new rocket, if only it was directed against the Russians.
  • Sergey269 23 May 2020 07: 23 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Resentment Lukashenko - FARS! He is well aware that weapons technology is much more expensive than weapons themselves. Joint production of missiles, a priori, implies the transfer of Russian technologies (which are secret, of national importance) to the not always adequate Brother. And where are the guarantees that in the near future, these technologies will end up in completely “non-fraternal countries”? China delivered missiles to Belarus? Put! Not for free, of course ... But, the technology of their production? So Lukashenko is rushing about, and to eat a fish and not choke on a bone. Something is in no hurry to share with us developments on the same MZKT. You can discuss for a long time on this topic, but cooperation should be trustworthy, mutually beneficial. Buy Russian goods, sell yours, just do not speculate with the “brotherhood of peoples”! Old Man acts on the principle - "Promise does not mean to marry", and, all the time of his reign. Personally, I have nothing against him, he reminds me of the chairman of the collective farm from the film "Kuban Cossacks". Only now the times are somewhat different ...
    1. Enemy 23 May 2020 09: 01 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      So Russia is creating Platform-O, and obsolete MWCs will transport Byalorussian potatoes to Europe)))
  • Rusticolus 23 May 2020 08: 15 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    It seems Old Man again wanted everything for free for free. Show everything, give it all, feed it a drink, bring it back ... And then such a bummer. Ah ah ah what a bad Russia. Missiles (for free) does not teach to do. Using their landfills (for no reason) does not. That is how his thoughts should be read.
  • Enemy 23 May 2020 08: 59 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Russia has done everything right! You can’t have anything to do with the unaddressed.
    Remember how Lukashenko was indignant at the export-made fighters received.
    Of course, if they were in Russian, they would have sold it to Americans, like the S-300 for study
  • Alex Justice 23 May 2020 09: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    This is how North Korea would like to test missiles in the United States or vice versa :)
  • Gennady Fomkin 23 May 2020 09: 46 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    The leader of the Indian tribe gathered in the jungle:
    - INDIANS !!! Are we a great people?
    - DAAAAAA!
    “Then why don't we have a nuclear missile?”
    - Well ... Let's build.
    They cut down the healthiest sequoia, hollowed out the core with axes, prepared gunpowder according to old Spanish recipes, hammered it, nailed a cork, brought an awesome rope to the wick.
    - Where will we launch it?
    - Let's go to Yerevan!
    - And why to Yerevan?
    - I don’t know others ...
    They wrote on the rocket “To Yerevan”, crowded all the tribes, set fire to the wick-rope ... HOW TO ZHANANET! ... In short, the local Armageddon: smoke, cinder, everyone is lying around ... The leader without a leg, without a hand, looks around:
    - Nyha ... I can imagine what is happening in Yerevan ...
  • Gennady Fomkin 23 May 2020 09: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It happens. We Borya carried the same nonsense, only for the most part drunk or from Budun. laughing
  • Ovsigovets 23 May 2020 11: 19 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    not really some kind of appropriate indignation at the rejection of joint development ..... Who is the specialist and who will say - does the Russian Federation have any problems with the PSU for the MLRS currently in service ??? As far as I am aware - there are NO such problems. The logical question is - why should we reinvent the wheel to replace the bicycle? Development involves R&D, that is, expensive and costly pleasure with the ultimate goal of what? Fit “Father’s” new PSU for MLRS for our money ???? I’m ready to pay if the “Father’s” position is for example the Head of the Belarusian Territory ....... like for example the Krasnoyarsk Territory (dear sabers I ask you not to be offended, BUT you can compare the scale of territories on Google maps and believe the Krasnoyarsk Territory no less)
  • vkd.dvk 23 May 2020 14: 39 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: DPN
    In general, while Belarus is blocking Moscow from NATO and the United States. And not vice versa.

    Belarus was rescued by all the peoples of the USSR. At least proof of this is the number of losses.
    Belarusians gave their lives, undoubtedly, in the name of both their own and others' freedom. Eternal memory to them. But others did the same. And in much larger quantities.
    1. vavilon 24 May 2020 09: 49 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      first read your comment carefully, do you even understand what you're talking about? what's the difference between us and them? we are not used to them, they are not us))
      What are we made of another test?
      Did the blue blood play?
      Is it the real attitude of Russia towards its peoples, or are the Chukchi closer to us than Belarusians? They just have oil for which our oligarchs replenish their pockets
      Here it is the face of oligarchic Russia
  • vkd.dvk 23 May 2020 14: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    Quote: Hagen
    Missile technology is an area sensitive to privacy. Anyone here is more expensive to let themselves.

    So we worked together with India and now she has a brahmos. And this one is not adequate.

    Two big differences. Missile technology, being in the army, sooner or later lose both relevance and novelty. The more participants in the operation, the less secrecy, at least do something.
    The main thing here is not secrecy, but a share in the development.
    Pilot production, development, a very expensive business. Invest in the project on equal terms for India and Belarus .... do you feel the difference?
  • Nicholas 23 May 2020 17: 21 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    There is a landfill in Belarus with a range of up to 350 km- this is Dretun, if you’re couch analysts, you know something, but all this was invented to roll a barrel on Russia and there is something for that, the older brother does not want to overpay for the purchase of enterprises that may come in handy for the military-industrial production of Russia, this is the whole point.
  • Prisoner 23 May 2020 19: 44 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    And ours are not indignant that this ally neither recognized Crimea, nor Abkhazia with South Ossetia. Affairs. what
  • Nicholas 23 May 2020 20: 20 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    I’m not an MLRS system, but as it was, I know that the former commander of the city of Gradovets is going to the dacha and tells me he saw what the Belarusians created and what I asked, and the polonaise says. I tell him pah. what they created there, the chassis, and the Chinese delivered the missiles, he did not believe me. So when Grigorych declared openly that the missiles were purchased from China, he called him, indicating that the engineers were engineers. They claimed that it would take 10 years to develop the missiles themselves . Some information was received from Ukraine. Grigorych said that he acted in Stalin's order, ordered his to do, they did, in response, that the Russians did not give him Iskander. But he said that they helped the Chinese and shoot Polonaise 450 km, and now he is Iskander I didn’t need it. I became interested in the Chinese MLRS systems and found out that they have 5 calibres — we have 3.120,220 and 300 and the range exceeds the largest 450 km. But as you can see, the Chinese again deceived. And when tested at the training ground, Dretun Polonaise shot at 220 km. Vot Grygorich didn’t put pressure on his engineers, but I can’t shoot at 450 km. Well, as always, offer Russia. It didn’t work, there are attacks prepared as always, like there’s a missile and there’s no way to test the landfills in Russia .That to test on Dretuni, in the same place they wanted to shoot at 400 km. Well, bite again. offend the younger brother. But the Chinese in the MLRS case went into the front. The range of our tornadoes-C is only being developed at 200 km, while the latest data only work at a range of -120. Hurricane up to 70 km. latest development.
  • lopvlad 23 May 2020 20: 57 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    This is a signal if our closest ally not only does not agree to make a rocket with us, but the training ground does not provide


    this is not a signal, but a completely fair and logical response of Russia to the constant refusal of Belarus to deploy a Russian military base on its territory.

    We were lucky to come to an agreement with the Chinese, they need to bow for it.


    if China had invested as much as Russia all the decades of “independence” of Belarus, then they would have long forced Lukashenko to stand on their knees constantly. And then China would give a broken penny and Lukashenko would be ready to bow to them and Russia, thanks to which Belarus exists afloat, Figwam draws.
    He has proclaimed the struggle against the RUSSIAN WORLD and wants to continue living at the expense of Russia.
  • sergo42 24 May 2020 08: 04 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Old Man every day yells how independent and sovereign he is, and tries to sit not even two, but on three chairs. And apparently the ass is already torn, as any refusal to give him something for free again falls into hysteria.
  • vavilon 24 May 2020 09: 11 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    That's whose policy unites the former peoples of the USSR
    Here it is the real attitude of Russia towards its peoples, that’s what it says without comment.
    And the further the more I become disappointed in the policy of Russia in relation to my people
  • vkd.dvk 24 May 2020 09: 58 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: vavilon
    first read your comment carefully, do you even understand what you're talking about? what's the difference between us and them? we are not used to them, they are not us))
    What are we made of another test?
    Did the blue blood play?
    Is it the real attitude of Russia towards its peoples, or are the Chukchi closer to us than Belarusians? They just have oil for which our oligarchs replenish their pockets
    Here it is the face of oligarchic Russia

    Here is the answer of the real Natsik. My post-answer to the one who wrote that Belarusians protected us from the outside. Not Belarusians. NO, we are all. Is this the attitude of the elder, boss, Nazi, or Nazism in your answer? You begin to weave Evenks, Chukchi here, with a tonality of their secondary quality. This is you-share.
  • vkd.dvk 24 May 2020 10: 10 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: Ovsigovets
    not really some kind of appropriate indignation at the rejection of joint development ..... Who is the specialist and who will say - does the Russian Federation have any problems with the PSU for the MLRS currently in service ??? As far as I am aware - there are NO such problems. The logical question is - why should we reinvent the wheel to replace the bicycle? Development involves R&D, that is, expensive and costly pleasure with the ultimate goal of what? Fit “Father’s” new PSU for MLRS for our money ???? I’m ready to pay if the “Father’s” position is for example the Head of the Belarusian Territory ....... like for example the Krasnoyarsk Territory (dear sabers I ask you not to be offended, BUT you can compare the scale of territories on Google maps and believe the Krasnoyarsk Territory no less)

    Enough of independent Chechnya, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan. More of this chairman here. He dragged himself into the union until the moment he realized that he would not be allowed until the presidential elections in Russia-Belarus. I wanted to unite with the ability to print money (Russian rubles) in Minsk.
    Not a damn thing? With its 5% of total GDP, start spanking loot, flooding the country with empty pieces of paper. When he was denied such a thing, he began to forbish. For a long time, at the beginning of 2000. If combined, then only the regions of Russia. And no Belarus, in any form. He doesn’t want to do it. We are already getting used to living without these parasites. Don't you understand the difference - Krasnoyarsk Territory has no national color. Belorussky has, and the border, conditional, can ALWAYS become unconditional. The USSR fell apart precisely for this. The United States has no national characteristics in its state structure. Therefore, it can not fall apart. We ALL republics have their own territory. Only the Russian Republic does not exist, and we do not have our own land in Russia.
    1. vavilon 24 May 2020 13: 22 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Russian republic? !! )))))))
      They made fun
      And the Russians themselves, who do you think they exist or not?
  • pro100y.belarus 24 May 2020 10: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Parades, rockets ... As if there was nothing more to do. Which way to bullet? And if pulnut, will not they smear you in response?
    Some kind of adult game in the "soldiers".
    It would be better if he washed the cows ... it would be more useful.
    1. Sergey49 24 May 2020 13: 57 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      So fight off Russia in case of something :)
  • al.cozeev 24 May 2020 13: 07 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Belarusians, is your "" president "" adequate? Let Russia test rockets for you? What, sorry to blow up his fellow countryman? Again, Russia owes and owes you? You immediately Announce the entire list of requests and requirements for Russia, we at least laugh at your requests and requirements.
  • businessv 24 May 2020 14: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Since when has the teddy bear become the same height as Father But ?!
  • Tarasios 24 May 2020 14: 32 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    In recent years, Lukashenko has acted like a walking wife: she does what she wants, but she always blames her husband for everything. That would, like, dare not raise his head and look at the situation with a sober, unfrozen look. Constantly annoying, looking for a reason to buy more, but ... does not give up. Because the husband contains, and lovers ... this is the most, and only "promise to get married";)
    1. The comment was deleted.
  • vkd.dvk 24 May 2020 16: 06 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: vavilon
    Russian republic? !! )))))))
    They made fun
    And the Russians themselves, who do you think they exist or not?

    And you think deeply. If there is anything. I understand that it will lead us all to the implementation of this undertaking. Lord, do not bring what. But facts are a stubborn thing.
  • vkd.dvk 24 May 2020 16: 09 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: al.cozeev
    Belarusians, is your "" president "" adequate? Let Russia test rockets for you? What, sorry to blow up his fellow countryman? Again, Russia owes and owes you? You immediately Announce the entire list of requests and requirements for Russia, we at least laugh at your requests and requirements.

    Yes, it’s not about spoiling the land for a hundred years. The fact is that Russia DOES NOT need to participate in the development of what has long been as it is. Throw money in the name of fanaberia Lukashenko?
  • vkd.dvk 24 May 2020 16: 10 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: strelokmira
    what to develop then? )))

    If it’s difficult to read the article, can you at least master the headline?
  • vkd.dvk 24 May 2020 16: 13 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: AlexFly
    Sometimes, in small things, interesting ideas are hidden or are born ... And just to deny - this is the lot of nihilists, I hope with them not along the way ...

    You should not tell your father what to do with your mother. No matter how small you are.
    You grow up, you will ....