How can the West donate nuclear weapons to Islamic radicals?

36
Words that the "progressive" West strongly opposes Iran’s getting nuclear weaponsalready managed to fill the edge. The main slogan of Western leaders sounds like this: the nuclear club should not expand, otherwise it will lead to an imbalance in the current geopolitical situation in the world. Strange ... And we thought that the very geopolitical situation in the world since the collapse of the Soviet Union has already been unbalanced to the limit ...

Today, according to official statistics, the club of nuclear powers includes 8 states of the world: Russia, USA, China, France, Pakistan, India, North Korea and Great Britain. There are other considerations on this score, according to which Israel can also be attributed to the nuclear powers. The official authorities of this state do not disclose their secrets, but there are several historical evidence that could, in one way or another, shed light on Israel's own nuclear capabilities.

So in the fall of 1979, one of the American satellites recorded a series of flashes above the water surface in the southern part of the Atlantic Ocean (area of ​​the uninhabited Bouvet Island). These outbreaks would not have provoked a heated discussion if the calculations of the power of the sources yielded stunning results. It turned out that the series of flares is nothing more than nuclear explosions up to 3-x kilotons. By that time, it was already known that South Africa was conducting its work on creating its own nuclear weapons. However, at the same time, an alternative version of the incident in the South Atlantic appeared: Israel conducted the first nuclear test (either independently or in the course of joint activities with Pretoria).

After that, several Western publications published the information that the Israelis are preparing to create the so-called strategic nuclear triad. In addition, in the British edition of The Sunday Times, an interview appeared with Mordechai Vanunu (who presented himself as a former employee of the Israeli nuclear center), who said that Israel is developing its nuclear weapons in intensively enough at secret bases located in the Negev desert. It would seem that official Israel could just laugh at the interview for Vanun himself, but instead he (Vanunu) was abducted by Mossad agents in Italy, taken to the Promised Land, where he was sentenced to 18 years in prison. For what? For the disclosure of state secrets ...

It turns out that the words of Vanunu were true, otherwise what else was a state secret understood by the Israeli investigation and court. In general, as they say, the facts are obvious, but nobody has officially managed to either confirm or refute the information on Israel’s nuclear program, so the hypothesis still remains a hypothesis, and Israel is officially considered a state free of nuclear weapons. However, there is another rather strange thing about this issue: Israel has not yet signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which also leads to certain thoughts ...

So, if you sweep away all this official snobbery and assume that Israel is the 9 member of an international nuclear club, then very interesting conclusions can come to the surface. In the event of an attack on Iran, the Israeli state may become the main target of Shiite radicals on virtually all fronts, and here the war against Iran will turn into a war against the Lebanese Hezbollah and Harakat Amal, who have their own accounts with Israel. It is impossible to dismiss the fact that on the spot, the fighting against Israel from the Gaza Strip will be launched by Hamas, supported by the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades. If so, then the question arises: is Israel able to conduct military operations on several fronts at once, or will it have to ask for help from the Western allies to pacify Lebanon and Gaza? Requests for help, as well as attempts to solve problems on their own, can turn into a large-scale war, and already during the war, the very nuclear facilities in the Negev territory, about which Mordechai Vanunu said at the time, with a special fighting spirit and desire of Israel’s opponents. In other words, in the conditions of a large-scale war that Israel itself can unleash against Iran, Israel’s nuclear development may well fall into the hands of radical Islamists. And then the West is unlikely to call these forces fighters for freedom and democracy, unlike the Libyan or Syrian versions. Yes, these “fighters”, by and large, after mastering the secrets of nuclear weapons, will already not give a damn about what labels they hang depending on their moods in Washington or London.

It turns out that Israel, launching an operation against Iran and destroying Iranian nuclear development, may, unwillingly, carry out a kind of emission of nuclear secrets into the world of Islamic radicalism.

However, not only Israel today is the state that is able to “bestow” on militants of various stripes the hidden secrets of creating nuclear weapons. Another state that can go this way, wishing it or not, is Pakistan. In this case, the very appearance of Pakistan’s nuclear potential caused heated debates, because the country was far from being, let's say, politically homogenized, and, by the way, remains so today.

After relations between the Pakistani and US authorities became extremely cold due to the “erroneous” bombardment by NATO aircraft of the positions of Pakistani military personnel in Pakistan and the “secret” destruction of Osama bin Laden in Abbotabad (Pakistan) by US special forces without coordinating the operation with local authorities , the leadership of Pakistan announced that it could head for a complete rupture of relations with the United States. Realizing that the big fish itself goes into their hands, the Taliban have stepped up their activities in this region, with which some high-ranking military personnel of the Pakistani army began to actively cooperate. Yes, yes, the very Taliban, which can be called flesh and blood of the American brainchild, which allowed Washington to solve its own problems in Afghanistan for a certain time. But as they say, the paths of fathers and children in this world can diverge, which is what happened after the September 11 2001 attacks. President Bush publicly stated that it was Islamic radicalism that dealt a blow to the democratic principles of the modern world, and therefore it is necessary to begin a merciless war with it. Only now Bush, for some reason, did not add that he was going to fight with the very Islamic radicalism that the United States itself had so actively all the last time (including on the territory of the Russian North Caucasus) ...

And if the Taliban are already trying to get closer to the Pakistani leadership “offended” by the Americans, then it is possible that the Taliban can reach those people in Pakistan who are related to the nuclear program. And such a rapprochement may well take place in the event of an attack by the West on Iran. But this will be, frankly, an entertaining situation: the Islamist movement generated by Western ideologists receives American nuclear secrets donated to Islamabad and, overwhelmed by a feeling of "gratitude" for the fact that the United States used this movement and wiped its feet on it, it strikes the Empire with a retaliatory strike. The picture, of course, appears in the most, that neither is, fatal way, but, as mathematicians say: any probability can be embodied in a real event.

So it turns out that the so-called Western civilization, taking care that the weapons of mass destruction do not appear in Iran, can itself donate these weapons to Islamic extremists, many of whom nursed them with their milk. Here it is - globalization ...
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    4 August 2012 08: 33
    Anything can be expected from the West in the USA; this state, led by frostbitten leaders, can take any action. This may be the transfer of nuclear weapons to scumbags from the monarchies of the Persian Gulf. In general, when you read, what the scumbag state is up to is becoming uncomfortable.
    1. +1
      4 August 2012 15: 13
      Well, how can he give it?! ... For example ... Although it is not needed, there are a lot of plots of gray-brown-crimson revolutions aimed at destabilizing the political regime. The country's leadership is reacting to terrorists (the opposition, in principle) by starting a clean-up operation ... The West is screaming together in ecstasy that human rights are being violated, which means NATO's military invasion is justified. A meat grinder begins in which the legitimate government is destroyed. The result is that the territory is occupied. The "revolutionaries" are rummaging around the destroyed country in search of something that NATO aviation did not manage to bomb or plunder. Oops :))) Found! Nuka that we have here ?! Oh, chemical / nuclear weapons (which I hope will never happen) ... Somehow I think so ... Let's summarize, the opposition, together with NATO, can do something that will not seem like a little ... This is like a plot of events in Libya, when oil pipelines and oil refineries were "seized" by private American security companies ... I don’t understand something, if these private traders did not loose their girdles, someone hired them ... But the question is who, and most importantly, when did sell it all ?! ... I might be wrong, but I expressed my point of view ... Thanks to those who had the patience to read this comment. Thank you for attention.
      1. Plus 36,6
        -1
        4 August 2012 19: 38
        EVERYONE download in the internet program TOR - browser
        We go around any ban and create at least 10 accounts on this and not only the site
        Verified and recommended by the Neighbor
        GOST
    2. +2
      5 August 2012 20: 57
      Quote: Sakhalininets
      Anything can be expected from the West in the USA; this state, led by frostbitten leaders, can take any action. This may be the transfer of nuclear weapons to scumbags from the monarchies of the Persian Gulf.

      Why transfer? There is a lot of information that Saudi Arabia is starting its nuclear program. And in power there ..................... and you don’t need to pass it on to anyone, not what !! !!!!!!!!!!
  2. +3
    4 August 2012 09: 10
    And why am I not surprised ....
  3. +4
    4 August 2012 09: 30
    Well, apparently the horror story about world terrorism is no longer scary.
    We decided to come up with more help. World nuclear terrorism.
  4. itr
    -1
    4 August 2012 11: 04
    Forgot about Japan
    1. Barrel
      +3
      4 August 2012 12: 30
      What did you forget? She is not a member of the nuclear club and, according to the constitution, cannot be one.
    2. +2
      5 August 2012 13: 04
      Japan is not an independent entity, it is an occupied territory with limited sovereignty.
  5. 0
    4 August 2012 11: 27
    ["a new generation of Islamic radicals"]
  6. +10
    4 August 2012 11: 33
    Islam is such a peaceful religion that if you show someone the middle finger, you don’t need to be afraid that they will swear in your hearts in return.
    You just get fucked then killed.
    1. +2
      4 August 2012 14: 54
      Good day, friends! And you comrade 53-Sciborskiy. I do not argue, this is your opinion, but listen to what I think about it. The religion of Islam itself, it does not preach aggression, it was made aggressive by people, fanatics with a tightly torn off tower, such as the Wahhabis, the Taliban. Only once did some eccentric idiot finish writing the word "jihad" and that's it, they rushed over the bumps, and that was all they needed to justify their hatred, cruelty, and to realize their dirty, delusional, bloodthirsty desires. Unfortunately, radical Islam is gaining more and more popularity and it worries me both as a Christian and as a peaceful inhabitant who is not indifferent to the well-being of his homeland and family.
      1. +3
        4 August 2012 23: 19
        I completely agree with you, but I had in mind radical Islam.
  7. +1
    4 August 2012 11: 36
    In this they are trying to distract from something more global. And this is alarming.
    Amer has always done this if they needed to shove something without the media.
  8. itr
    +2
    4 August 2012 11: 41
    Israel will not be offended by the Americans. How will they stir up water in this region without them
  9. DNA
    DNA
    0
    4 August 2012 11: 54
    What Iran was trying to create nuclear weapons for as a counterweight to Israel. In general, Israel has been bored lately, they are so right and the neighbors are so bad with respect to Israel, so there is a reason for this not to love Israel. And the United States does not care where to shove nuclear weapons, if only world democracy flourishes and there is world peace thanks to the American club. Ugh on you, the United States themselves created the Taliban to fight the USSR themselves and created the enemy themselves now fight it.
    1. LAO
      LAO
      -1
      4 August 2012 23: 06
      Ayatollah clearly said - the last war as a result of which Islam will be established throughout the world. Do you like Islam?
      1. DNA
        DNA
        0
        5 August 2012 22: 29
        Some kind of nonsense that Islam will be established all over the world. And I’ll answer the question if I like Islam. I’ll answer to no religion in the world. I don’t sympathize with me anyway. And in general, what is the fear of traditional Islam? What kind of Western paranoia about Islam.
  10. Morgan stanley
    -2
    4 August 2012 12: 20
    Well, the terrorists will have nuclear weapons, but how will they launch it ??? With a bazooka ??? fool
    1. +1
      4 August 2012 14: 41
      It’s a pity insults are forbidden, I would answer you.

      Read about ance ammunition.
      In the end, the charge can be replaced and delivered in the truck (though do you really believe that there is an Islamic radical willing to control such a machine)

      ----------------------------------------
      and on the title of the article How can the West donate nuclear weapons to Islamic radicals?, correct answer - easily sad
      1. Morgan stanley
        0
        4 August 2012 21: 23
        And where will they deliver it ??? In the Russian Federation? in USA? in Germany ??? Yes? But as? Underground Fri?
        1. +3
          4 August 2012 23: 48
          The eccentric man. Here is the line in the article:
          It turns out that Israel, launching an operation against Iran and destroying Iranian nuclear development, may, unwillingly, carry out a kind of emission of nuclear secrets into the world of Islamic radicalism.
          or do you think that you can’t reach the objects in the territory of Israel by truck?

          How many tempting goals for terrorists in the territories of the Middle and Middle East, and even in North Africa. If you recall the recent History:
          the explosion of the American embassy in Beirut in 1983 (63 people were killed), the explosion of the US marine corps and the French paratroopers in Beirut (242 marines and 58 paratroopers were killed)
          - what were the resonant events. And if not a truck with explosives but a truck with nuclear weapons exploded under the barracks, could it not be that the media effect (which the terrorists are seeking) has intensified?

          Well, and backpack warheads - generally anywhere you can deliver. (good American scientists invented it for these purposes)
  11. Barrel
    +1
    4 August 2012 12: 29
    What ... we abandoned nuclear weapons?! ... crying
    1. Morgan stanley
      +3
      4 August 2012 13: 42
      Quote: Barrel
      What ... we abandoned nuclear weapons?! ...

      Sanctions would be against us. Yes, and the nuclear control panel was in Moscow.
    2. wax
      +1
      5 August 2012 16: 28
      And did Kravchuk and Shushkevich and Yeltsin drink in the Pushcha?
  12. +3
    4 August 2012 14: 59
    The article is based on the fact that "Israel's nuclear development may well end up in the hands of radical Islamists." Something I can't believe. But the fact that the United States can give nuclear weapons to the Islamists under its control is quite possible. For example, the Saudis. For "protection" from Iran.
  13. scientist cat
    +3
    4 August 2012 17: 52
    the Islamist movement generated by Western ideologues receives American nuclear secrets donated to Islamabad and, overwhelmed with a sense of “gratitude” for the US using this movement and wiping its feet, strikes the Empire


    in the context of the large-scale war that Israel itself may unleash with regard to Iran, the nuclear development of Israel may well be in the hands of radical Islamists.


    What "literate" wrote this nonsense? Article minus.
    First, the US did not transfer nuclear technology to Pakistan.
    But the Soviet Union for nuclear purposes transferred nuclear technology to its allies.
    The Soviet Union transferred them to China, North Korea and India.
    And already China transferred nuclear technology to Pakistan, as opposed to India.
    And secondly, the chance that nuclear technology from Israel will transfer to Islamic countries generally tends to zero.
    Rather, these technologies will be transferred to them by Pakistan, S. Korea or Russia.
  14. LAO
    LAO
    +3
    4 August 2012 20: 32
    Nonsense. Of course, I'm sorry if I offended anyone, but the logic suffers! I understand where the author is driving, but the author is behind the flock with a deuce!
  15. Roman 3671
    +2
    4 August 2012 20: 46
    In Liverpool, a three-month process has recently completed. Nine Muslims were found guilty of numerous rape by British teenagers. During the process, it turned out that the police and social workers in every possible way avoided investigating the cases they knew for fear of being accused of racism. The shocking details of this process open a new page in the debate about the fate of multiculturalism in the UK, and many are beginning to think that political correctness has gone too far.

    More recently, it became known that Rotherham's social workers (north of England), for over 6 years, concealed information about a teenage girl (young mother) who was killed because two Pakistani families, teenagers from whom used her sexual services, “dishonored” her .

    On May 29, 2012, the Rotherham Council for the Protection of Children issued a communiqué about such incidents, including this one. But the politically incorrect paragraphs that certain “Asian men” took part in the fate of the girl were removed from the document. Even in court, the Council tried to hide this information, although the seized paragraphs had already leaked to the press. However, none of the Council was held accountable. It also became known that the girl was supervised by at least 15 departments and services of the Council, but no one wanted to help her, fearing accusations of racism.

    In Leicester, a gang of drunken Somalis beat a passerby in the city center, but was released, as a politically correct judge decided that "Muslim women are not used to drinking."

    In London, the two Muslims who insulted and then raped a 24-year-old woman for a long time were sentenced to a maximum sentence; politically correct judge considered them "not representing public danger."

    In Wiltshire, the police, stopping the 18-year-old driver, demanded to remove the English flag from the hood. According to the young man, the patrolman said that the flag, as an “act of racism”, could “insult Muslim immigrants.” The young man had to obey under the threat of a fine. Philip Davis, Conservative Parliamentarian Philip Davis is outraged. “What the hell is racism about demonstrating a country's flag on its territory ?!” he says.

    In Southampton, when passengers complained about non-English-speaking taxi drivers and several drivers pasted the "I speak English" posters on cars, racial unrest began. As a result, the frightened authorities declared the stickers “racist” and “offensive” and ordered the drivers to remove them under threat of a fine.

    In Manchester (2006), a 14-year-old girl was arrested by the police for "racism." She turned to the teacher with a request to transfer her to another group, since no one in her group speaks English, but only in Urdu, which she does not understand. The teacher, shouting rudely at her, called the police. The girl was arrested, photographed, fingerprints were taken from her, and she was detained for more than three hours in the police station on suspicion of "violation of public order due to racial motives."

    http://putnik1.livejournal.com/1789664.html#cutid1
  16. Shooter308ful
    +1
    4 August 2012 21: 03
    Russia at the moment will not transfer nuclear technology to Islamic countries. Such, for example, as Iran. The Russian leadership, represented by former President Medvedev, was so bent over before the United States and the EU that it did not supply defensive weapons like the S-300 under an agreement already advanced by Iran. Someone will say that the S-300 can be used as a means of nuclear weapons delivery, but then this applies to any transportation vehicle, and especially senile persons can consider a children's slingshot in these means.
    1. scientist cat
      0
      4 August 2012 23: 51
      Shooter308ful,

      Russia at the moment will not transfer nuclear technology to Islamic countries. Such, for example, as Iran.


      I hope that Russia really will neither transfer nuclear technology, nor supply the latest weapons, such as the S-300, until Iran refuses to create nuclear weapons.
      In my opinion, one of the worst forms of government is Islamic theocracy.
      In general, a country that has colossal hydrocarbon reserves has no particular need to build nuclear power plants, so I do not believe in Iran’s peaceful atom. But I believe that with the advent of nuclear weapons in Iran, an arms race will begin in the world - primarily for balance, nuclear weapons will be wanted in the region: in Egypt, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and then around the world, for example, Japan and South Korea.
      Iran should abandon attempts to create nuclear weapons.
      And immediately after the lifting of the embargo, with the money from the sale of oil and gas, to develop a conventional army, at least to purchase modern air defense systems from Russia, such as the S-300 or aviation.

      The Russian leadership, represented by former President Medvedev, was so bent over before the United States and the EU that it did not supply defensive weapons like the S-300 under an agreement already advanced by Iran.


      In accordance with the foregoing, I consider the refusal to supply S-300 a wise decision. In addition, we should not forget about the territorial differences over the Caspian shelf.
      And about the penalty for the canceled contract, it is necessary to demand from the USA and Israel to cover the penalty for canceling the contract themselves, that would be fair.
      1. Morgan stanley
        0
        5 August 2012 02: 57
        Quote: cat scientist
        And in general, a country that has colossal hydrocarbon reserves has no particular need to build nuclear power plants, so I don’t believe in Iran’s peaceful atom

        You are mistaken. When the demand for oil and gas decreases, then everything goes for export, and this is income, so it’s more profitable for Iran to build a nuclear power plant than a couple more stations for oil.
        Quote: cat scientist
        In accordance with the foregoing, I consider the refusal to supply S-300 a wise decision.

        O5 is still mistaken ... It was not wise, since Iran is an ally of the Russian Federation, it needs to be supported.
        Quote: cat scientist
        And about the penalty for the canceled contract, it is necessary to demand from the USA and Israel to cover the penalty for canceling the contract themselves, that would be fair.

        And what kind of cancer are they here ??? They did not directly dissuade the Russian Federation from supplying S-300 to Iran, and taking all the blame for the imperfect contract.
        1. scientist cat
          0
          5 August 2012 09: 23
          Morgan stanley,

          When the demand for oil and gas decreases, then everything goes for export, and this is income, so it’s more profitable for Iran to build a nuclear power plant than a couple more stations for oil.


          Well, where now is this their benefit from the introduction of nuclear power plants, a lot of all kinds of sanctions and embargoes have already been put on Iran.
          Because of this, Iran has huge losses and gigantic inflation, but they decided not to refuse to continue nuclear research.
          So, you can be sure that there is no smell of a peaceful atom here.

          It was not wise, since Iran is an ally of the Russian Federation, it needs to be supported

          A muddy ally of some kind, unreliable, will betray as soon as the opportunity arises.
          Again, the form of government is Islamic theocracy, they are for worldwide jihad, there are territorial differences on the Caspian shelf, and in the past it has never been an ally of Russia, it is currently a competitor in the oil and gas market.

          And what kind of cancer are they here ??? They did not directly dissuade the Russian Federation from supplying S-300 to Iran, and taking all the blame for the imperfect contract


          Yes, you fell off the moon! Of course, the supply of S-300 to Iran was canceled by Russia after the requests / demands / threats / promises of the United States, Israel and possibly other countries. But then no one could have imagined that the court would decide to pay a penalty to Iran despite the embargo imposed. So the United States and Israel must take the penalty for the failure of the contract, especially for the United States it will not cost anything, because most recently the American court ruled that Iran is obliged to pay 6 billion dollars for the explosion of the twin towers. Or the United States may pay a fine for the forfeit from the seized accounts of the Iranian central bank.
          1. Morgan stanley
            0
            5 August 2012 12: 38
            Quote: cat scientist
            Well, where now is this their benefit from the introduction of nuclear power plants, a lot of all kinds of sanctions and embargoes have already been put on Iran.

            And they were not afraid, they continue to go on to their dream.
            Quote: cat scientist
            A muddy ally of some kind, unreliable, will betray as soon as the opportunity arises.
            Again, the form of government is Islamic theocracy, they are for worldwide jihad, there are territorial differences on the Caspian shelf, and in the past it has never been an ally of Russia, it is currently a competitor in the oil and gas market.

            For the Russian Federation - all competitors. Yes, and if you think so who is the ally and who is not, the ash stump, you do not have them. Belarus and Kazakhstan, how they will help you, unlike Iran, which has a large population, respectively, they are stronger, the call will be greater in case of war.
            Quote: cat scientist
            Yes, you fell off the moon! Of course, the supply of S-300 to Iran was canceled by Russia after the requests / demands / threats / promises of the USA, Israel

            They did not undertake the obligation to pay damages for non-fulfillment of the contract, and the Russian Federation itself was "afraid" and refused to supply S-300s to Iran, on its own initiative, because the embargo did not forbid selling S-300s to Iran.
            1. scientist cat
              0
              5 August 2012 17: 02
              Morgan stanley,
              And they are not afraid, they continue to go on to their dream

              That's it, but a dream is a nuclear weapon, not a peaceful atom.

              For the Russian Federation - all competitors. Yes, and if you think so who is the ally and who is not, the ash stump, you do not have them. Belarus and Kazakhstan, how they will help you, unlike Iran, which has a large population, respectively, they are stronger, the call will be greater in case of war.

              I agree with the thesis that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
              In accordance, Iran should have been helped, but not in this case, it is necessary to look at the future, nuclear weapons in the hands of Iran’s ayatols will not add peace to the world, on the contrary.
              The Russian Federation itself was "afraid" and refused to supply S-300s to Iran, on its own initiative, because the embargo did not prohibit the sale of S-300s to Iran.

              The Russian Federation itself did not refuse to supply S-300 systems, but under pressure from the United States, respectively, it is necessary to demand that the United States pay a forfeit.
              1. Morgan stanley
                -1
                6 August 2012 02: 48
                Quote: cat scientist
                The Russian Federation itself did not refuse to supply S-300 systems, but under pressure from the United States, respectively, it is necessary to demand that the United States pay a forfeit.

                Well, they were afraid. You can demand anything, but, pieces of paper in the studio that it was precisely because of the USA that the Russian Federation stopped supplying S-300 to Iran, and another piece of paper that the USA undertakes to compensate for losses from the contract. While this is not the case, the Russian Federation itself, on its own initiative, stopped supplying S-300 to Iran.
          2. Indigo
            0
            5 August 2012 12: 39
            Quote: cat scientist
            Yes, you fell off the moon! Of course, the supply of S-300 to Iran was canceled by Russia after the requests / demands / threats / promises of the United States, Israel and possibly other countries. But then no one could have imagined that the court would decide to pay a penalty to Iran despite the embargo imposed. So the United States and Israel must take the penalty for the failure of the contract, especially for the United States it will not cost anything, because most recently the American court ruled that Iran is obliged to pay 6 billion dollars for the explosion of the twin towers. Or the United States may pay a fine for the forfeit from the seized accounts of the Iranian central bank.

            You want to say that this so-called. "hitting" was formalized with some kind of documents? 4 billion raccoons of compensation is some%, even the Jews do not have such. That he smoked the so-called. a judge before making this decision? Did they want both for the intention to supply the C300 and for the refusal to screw up Russia financially?
            Remind me the last time the so-called The IAEA roamed the Israeli nuclear facilities, as the so-called media came snot about this. Iran needs to raise the question - one check from them - one in Israel. The presence of oil and nuclear weapons - guaranteed ensures the independence of the country.
            1. scientist cat
              0
              5 August 2012 17: 15
              Indigo,
              You want to say that this so-called. "hitting" was formalized with some kind of documents? Did they want both for the intention to supply the C300 and for the refusal - to screw up Russia financially?

              Most likely, the Geneva court was forced to make such a decision under pressure from the governments of the United States, Britain and Switzerland, in this way Russia offers a deal: agree to the destruction of the Iranian regime, and in return, the need to pay is canceled in connection with the destruction of the plaintiff.
              Remind me the last time the so-called The IAEA roamed the Israeli nuclear facilities, as the so-called media came snot about this. Iran needs to raise the question - one check from them - one in Israel.

              No need to mix everything together. Israel’s nuclear weapon is a long-held fact, if I’m not mistaken, Israel has had it since the 70s.
              At the moment, its further distribution should be prevented.
              1. Indigo
                0
                5 August 2012 17: 56
                Quote: cat scientist
                No need to mix everything together. Israel’s nuclear weapon is a long-held fact, if I’m not mistaken, Israel has had it since the 70s.
                At the moment, its further distribution should be prevented.

                You "got away" from the answer regarding the inspections of the IAEA of Israel, but you perceive the demands from the IAEA to Iran. The legality of the appearance of nuclear weapons in Israel is not subject to discussion by the international community, and in other countries - so to turn inside out .. Double standards only push countries (the so-called someone - rogue countries) to possess it. Remove double standards and in figs this expensive club will be needed by someone) ...
                1. scientist cat
                  0
                  5 August 2012 19: 53
                  Indigo,
                  You "got away" from the answer regarding inspections by the IAEA of Israel, but you perceive the demands from the IAEA to Iran.


                  As I already answered, it is already LATE to apply sanctions against Israel (as well as India or Pakistan) and demand IAEA inspections.
                  The overwhelming majority of countries in the world would not want this "expensive club" to appear in the Islamic Republic of Iran as well.
  17. sd34rwesgf
    0
    5 August 2012 12: 15
    The authorities of our country have done a lot, but this is already too much.
    I generally accidentally found him http://tini.cc/1jt
    Here is information about each of us, for example: relatives, friends, correspondence from social networks.
    And most importantly, it is accessible to everyone, I was really scared at first - you never know what moron there will climb
    Well, the truth is that you can delete all
  18. -1
    6 August 2012 06: 12
    Quote: MorganStanley
    Again, the form of government is Islamic theocracy,

    How is a hamster different from a rat? Hamster PR is better.

    How much can you listen to horror stories about the structure of Iranian society?
    Why is "European multiculturalism" or "American democracy" better?

    Regarding the proliferation of nuclear weapons: There were hints from Islamabad that if Iran were subjected to a nuclear strike, they would not sit idly by.
  19. 0
    11 October 2023 23: 18
    It is highly doubtful whether Israel has nuclear weapons. The territory is too small, the risks of storage and operation are too great. If you look at this from the perspective of international insurance and investment structures. This is 99 percent a bluff. Disinformation. And creating an image of indestructibility. Another thing is that in case of any circumstances it can be delivered in the shortest possible time by the same United States to the territory of Israel. Or the blow could be struck by the United States, and then it would be announced to the whole world that Israel defended itself in this way.