Anti-submarine strike groups formed in Kamchatka

March 9 2020 48

The Pacific Fleet (Pacific Fleet) received at its disposal two naval strike groups to counter submarines. They will be included in the connection of ships, which is part of the grouping of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and which protects the water region of the North-East of Russia.

This was announced by the head of the information support department of the Pacific Press Service fleet Nikolay Voskresensky.

Ship anti-submarine strike groups (KPUG) formed after successful firing, which were carried out using all types weaponsavailable to warships. These exercises became the prerequisite for the creation of two new formations in the Pacific Ocean.

The new naval units of the Pacific Fleet will have to defend sea lanes, search for and discover submarines of a potential enemy, patrol the zones indicated by the command, demonstrate the Russian flag and explore areas of the Pacific that are located at a considerable distance from the place of permanent basing.

The Russian Federation has to pay increased attention to strengthening defense capabilities. Such actions are especially relevant against the background of the aggravation of the military-political situation in the world.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

whatis love

+11

9 March 2020 13: 58

Are the ships even new or is this the usual renaming?
1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
  
  +26
  
  9 March 2020 14: 03
  
  The Pacific Fleet has 4 BODs of Project 1155, which are 30 +++ years old, patched, repatriated and running on parole and 2 new corvettes of Project 20380 "Perfect" and "Loud". I do not take into account the ancient IPCs. If the Amur Shipyard receives an order for 10 corvettes of Project 20380 for the Pacific Fleet, the situation will improve in the future. After the epic with the construction of "Perfect", "Amur shipyard" somehow life-giving accelerated with the construction of 2 and 3 corvettes.
  1. maidan.izrailovich
    
    +2
    
    10 March 2020 03: 57
    
    In the Pacific Fleet there are 4 BOD project 1155 ....
    
    In formation three. The youngest "Admiral Panteleev".
    Another representative of Project 1155 "Marshal Shaposhnikov" is undergoing modernization and reclassified as a frigate.
2. smart ass
  
  +7
  
  9 March 2020 14: 04
  
  Invented two new names for the ships left to build
3. Grigory_45
  
  +4
  
  9 March 2020 21: 21
  
  Quote: Whatislove
  And the ships are at least new
  
  where are the new ones from? there from the new - only two toothless corvettes pr 20380
Name Surname

0

9 March 2020 14: 00

2 corvettes, 2 BOD + 2 rusty MPC?
Unclear somehow
1. kepmor
  
  +19
  
  9 March 2020 14: 33
  
  the news is about nothing ...
  organizationally, the KPUG is formed once or twice ... it would be serviceable and the "flagship" would be more or less prepared ...
  any commander, and sometimes even NS, of the brigade (division) of PLO ships is a priori commander of the KPUG (commander of the search forces) ... without this, there is no permission to control the connection ...
  1. Krasnoyarsk
    
    +15
    
    9 March 2020 14: 44
    
    Quote: kepmor
    the news is about nothing ...
    
    And not news at all. It is not clear what. Formed from what? Pacific Fleet received new ships? At least 6 units. Not. So what are they made of? Of the old units? And why didn’t they form it before? Previously, the submarine’s submarine was not dangerous?
    In a word - another PUK ... in the waters of the Pacific Ocean.
2. figwam
  
  -6
  
  9 March 2020 14: 37
  Recently it was like that ...
  1. Sailor
    
    +5
    
    9 March 2020 20: 54
    
    This was recently during the years of my service 89-92.
rocket757

+4

9 March 2020 14: 01

In general, the underwater power of potential opponents is becoming more and more modern.
They must be opposed by modern, well-equipped, armed forces of the fleet.
Question - And what do they have? And what is and will be with us?
1. Sailor
  
  +5
  
  9 March 2020 20: 57
  
  We will have nothing, except in the best case, corvettes, and new yachts of GDP friends at the price of cruisers, and they have a fleet!
  1. rocket757
    
    -5
    
    9 March 2020 21: 19
    
    So categorically declare, this is absolutely faith in the country's leadership to lose ....
    In matters of security, territorial integrity of the country, not everything is so sour. There is reason to believe that there is their place to be. Not all is lost yet. We will see.
    1. Sailor
      
      +4
      
      9 March 2020 21: 23
      
      Yes, you look around, everything is bent, and we are told from the stands that we are ahead of the rest. A few years ago I was an ardent supporter of GDP, and when the veil left my eyes I saw that they were leading us to the slaughter.
      1. rocket757
        
        -4
        
        9 March 2020 22: 02
        
        I have not been, no, and will not be a supporter of THIS AUTHORITY.
        No illusions, expectations, respectively, no disappointments!
        I just really appreciate all the facts.
        This power is not going to give anything of fundamental importance to anyone, but for this, including need appropriate strength, economic and military ... about the support of the people, the issue is very controversial, but they can’t do without this support so far.
        That's all, this is an objective reality.
    2. Grigory_45
      
      +2
      
      9 March 2020 21: 24
      
      Quote: rocket757
      So categorically declare, it’s absolutely a belief in the country's leadership to lose
      
      and it (the manual) even hit a finger on a finger, so that the opinion changes ???
      
      Quote: rocket757
      In matters of security, the territorial integrity of the country, not everything is so sour.
      
      You looked at the composition of Pacific Fleet and software? there you will not look without tears. He (the fleet) will soon become a brigade of inflatable motor boats ....
      1. rocket757
        
        -3
        
        9 March 2020 22: 06
        
        What and how will be done, I can’t say ... because
        how the degree of greed and redneck / s / cannot be measured in anything, but they will try to save themselves, not to let anything out of their hands! They will do at least the minimum .... what exactly, we will see.
Ugolek

+19

9 March 2020 14: 01

It looks like the case when there is a name, but no ships, unfortunately.
1. alexmach
  
  +3
  
  9 March 2020 14: 20
  
  Well, at least from an organizational point of view, they pay attention to the issue. It is clear that the ships from this did not increase at all.
  1. bayard
    
    +5
    
    9 March 2020 16: 14
    
    Well, how has it not increased? And the "Thundering" (type 20385)? Exactly must prepare for the transition together with the head "Varshavyanka". The Amur plant is still picking something up ... This year (sort of) they promise to return "Shaposhnikov" (1155) from modernization ...
    Sarcasm of course, but still something is dripping.
    And the new "anti-submarine strike groups" ... after all, they may end up on the old 1124 IPC - there was a message that they were going to return all the old men to the ranks, apparently it got hot without a PLO ...
    1. alexmach
      
      +3
      
      9 March 2020 16: 50
      
      Well, how has it not increased? And the "Thundering" (type 20385)?
      
      Well, not yet transferred to the fleet, he did not arrive at the Pacific Fleet like everyone else, but if you look into the future, then there is also "Aldar Tsydenzhapov" on the way.
  2. Grigory_45
    
    +1
    
    9 March 2020 21: 28
    
    Quote: alexmach
    Well, at least from an organizational point of view, they pay attention to the issue.
    
    from an organizational point of view, nothing has changed since the days of the USSR. Such a connection could be formed in a couple of days, by order. It would be from ...
    By the way, since the Soviet times, the Pacific Fleet had the 44th brigade of anti-submarine ships (which included 4 BOD). What didn’t you like? The brigade disbanded into three groups?
    1. alexmach
      
      0
      
      9 March 2020 21: 49
      
      What didn’t you like? The brigade disbanded into three groups?
      
      Probably preparing for a change in the payroll and the appearance of new ships. In the coming years, 20380 are likely to be the main workhorses of these groups. BOD, God forbid, to undergo modernization according to the Shaposhnikov project. But again, with this modernization, anti-submarine weapons are practically not modernized in any way. Detection tools I mean
novel66

+2

9 March 2020 14: 12

suddenly, out of nowhere ....
Smart

+8

9 March 2020 14: 14

From the ten available units of the crew, various combinations are created for all possible threats.
So one and the same ship, depending on the goals set, can be in anti-submarine, landing, defensive, convoy and other formations ...
1. knn54
  
  +3
  
  9 March 2020 14: 54
  
  Therefore, two PUGs, one for even, the other for odd.
RUSLAN

+6

9 March 2020 14: 35

Uriyayaya! Well, now the adversary will definitely be pushing from us ... Now the kaaak will be formed by the headquarters of the anti-submarine strike groups command, the kaaak will be added ranks and posts to the swollen commander of the Pacific Fleet ... It’s a pity only the ship’s composition will remain the same .. .
Adimius38

+11

9 March 2020 14: 48

interestingly, not a single new anti-submarine was built in 30 years, but how loud TWO Ship Attack Groups sound loud .....
Adimius38

+5

9 March 2020 14: 57

The president said it’s enough of Hurray ... And they continue to do the same. Not a single new anti-submarine! point. And the Soviet old run on parole. For example, BOD Admiral Vinogradov, it is interesting in which year it underwent repairs and modernization, I don’t remember something. Admiral Tributz is the same song, well, Admiral Panteleev remained the more recent of the three put into operation in 1992. Again, there is no data on its modernization and repair, and since 1992, nearly 28 years have passed.
Protos

+4

9 March 2020 14: 57

Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
Ancient IPC I do not take into account

Very much in vain!
8 MPK project 1124M will receive "Package-NK" and "Minotavr-M"
The start of modernization is the end of 2019.
1. kepmor
  
  +7
  
  9 March 2020 15: 30
  
  But what's the point ??? ...
  - the body of the "albatross" was originally designed for 25-30 years of operation ... the "youngest" is already 26th ... and there are old people still 84-86 years old ...
  - Nikolaev gas turbines have been mothballed at all for a long time ... at the GDGD M-507A of the motor resource "a cat cried" for each compartment ... with the DGDG the situation will be even trickier ... it's better not to remember the bottom-outboard fittings ...
  all this is bliss ... A packet with the Minotaur is like Botox injections to a decrepit old man ... a blush appears, but walking anyway with a wand ...
Radical

+7

9 March 2020 15: 06

Anti-submarine strike groups formed in Kamchatka

The mountain gave birth to ... a mouse! This "news" does not deserve any other comment. Profanity with imitation is the current state of the country.
1. Paranoid50
  
  +2
  
  9 March 2020 15: 17
  
  Quote: Radikal
  Profanity with imitation is the current state of the country.
  
  It seems to have been confused with their own fortune.
  1. fk7777777
    
    0
    
    9 March 2020 19: 55
    
    Well, general, but the whole gosh, they probably suck the enemy to the impossibility of moving, and the enemy capitulates, and they will be upgraded to marshals.
AAK

+5

9 March 2020 15: 47

For the "minus" of the Pacific Fleet (not counting the launch of ICBMs with SSBNs from the berths in Vilyuchinsk), now, to our deep regret, the Navy of Japan and South Korea is more than enough
fa2998

+2

9 March 2020 15: 51

Quote: Clever man
Invented two new names for the ships left to build

Soon we will order ships in China. Just like they bake pies. Yes, there will be a blow to vanity, but we will ride on Chinese cars, but all the shops are filled up with Chinese "goodness." and we will rewrite budgets more than once.
1. Adimius38
  
  +3
  
  9 March 2020 16: 37
  
  in our case, destroyers have to be ordered in China for a long time, because they cannot build and design nothing. If we start designing, we will design at best in five years, five more years we will look for power where to build, and we will build the lead ship for ten years, and it will take 20 years to build a new destroyer in a single copy. In the best case, what we can master in ten years is Super Gorshkov, but at such a pace as we master it we will also wait for the first lead ship of the year, so 2030. Therefore, we must definitely order warships where all the infrastructure for building them is created and not problems with their construction. In principle, we can saturate the ships ourselves, both with weapons and radio-technical means, the main thing of the hull. There are many cases in history when Russia ordered warships at foreign shipyards
  1. Aag
    
    +3
    
    9 March 2020 17: 07
    
    ... And under this "article" not a single encouraging comment ...
    1. Adimius38
      
      +3
      
      9 March 2020 17: 40
      
      Because they are beginning to see clearly, everyone is tired of it Urya Urya, even the president said, I do not need cheers, I need a result. And in fact, we have only one frigate 22350 in service, and five have yet to be built. Three frigates 11356, and about a dozen corvettes. The rest is all Soviet in the main part is pretty worn out and needs a full repair and modernization. For example, the cruiser Moscow drove the old man in such a way that they are now having difficulty restoring his course, and yet such ships need full repair and modernization and they need to be protected since we cannot build anything like that in such tonnage.
      1. Aag
        
        +4
        
        9 March 2020 17: 49
        
        Well-read, heard ... And it is depressing.
      2. alexmach
        
        0
        
        9 March 2020 21: 44
        
        And in fact, we have only one frigate 22350 in service, and five have yet to be built.
        
        "Admiral Kasatonov" will be handed over this year.
        "Golovko" was promised to be launched this year. Not everything is so sad
        Three frigates 11356, and about a dozen corvettes
        12, for now, and there are rumors of an extension of the series.
2. fk7777777
  
  0
  
  9 March 2020 19: 57
  
  Well, Aviks, they’ll only have to order from them, from us all specialists left for them from us ...
huntsman650

+1

9 March 2020 16: 51

In the photo the BOD of the Northern Fleet))) "Severmorsk".
Protos

-5

9 March 2020 17: 44

Quote: Name Surname
Corvette, 2 BOD + 2 rusty MPC?
Unclear somehow

2 frigates project project 22350
2 corvettes of the project 20380
1 corvette of the project 20385
4 BOD
8 IPC
5 maximum concentration limits
In total, until 2024, it is planned to put into operation 2 more frigates, 4 corvettes, 7 minesweepers, 1 SSBN, 6 diesel-electric submarines, a number of auxiliary and support vessels
FomaKinyaev

+9

9 March 2020 17: 53

This news should be called like this: "once we had a completely normal fleet for two and in Kamchatka and in Vladik and many other places, and then we sold everything, people left, and now we needed a fleet there and we are we failed to sell, we are trying to mold some kind of group. " Personally, I see it this way. They formed .....
1. fk7777777
  
  0
  
  9 March 2020 19: 59
  
  Well, Peter’s fluffs, in some places they stayed, and they say pine trees on the mast can be put like ..
The comment was deleted.
Grigory_45

+1

9 March 2020 21: 13

Anti-submarine strike groups formed in Kamchatka
I wonder what means (what ships they entered) ???

At the Pacific Fleet today 1 RKR, 4 BOD, 2 destroyers, 2 corvettes. This is a list number.

The missile cruiser is Varangian

BOD - Admiral Tributs, Marshal Shaposhnikov, Admiral Vinogradov, Admiral Panteleev - all in the 44th brigade of anti-submarine ships. These BODs are over 30 years old, and they do not coexist with modern requirements - only Shaposhnikov and Tribits are really combat-ready

EM - two ancient Sarychs, Stormy and Fast. Third, Fearless, not on track. By themselves, these EMs cannot provide PLO

2 corvettes - Perfect and Loud, the only modern ships. Which, again, do not correspond to anything, neither in terms of reliability, nor in armament.

We do not take the IPC into account, because their combat value is insignificant.

And from what groups were formed, if not paper ??? Their two or three stale BOD, ship to strike group ???