Anti-submarine strike groups formed in Kamchatka


The Pacific Fleet (Pacific Fleet) received at its disposal two naval strike groups to counter submarines. They will be included in the connection of ships, which is part of the grouping of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and which protects the water region of the North-East of Russia.


This was announced by the head of the information support department of the Pacific Press Service fleet Nikolay Voskresensky.

Ship anti-submarine strike groups (KPUG) formed after successful firing, which were carried out using all types weaponsavailable to warships. These exercises became the prerequisite for the creation of two new formations in the Pacific Ocean.

The new naval units of the Pacific Fleet will have to defend sea lanes, search for and discover submarines of a potential enemy, patrol the zones indicated by the command, demonstrate the Russian flag and explore areas of the Pacific that are located at a considerable distance from the place of permanent basing.

The Russian Federation has to pay increased attention to strengthening defense capabilities. Such actions are especially relevant against the background of the aggravation of the military-political situation in the world.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Whatislove 9 March 2020 13: 58 New
    • 18
    • 7
    +11
    Are the ships even new or is this the usual renaming?
    1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 9 March 2020 14: 03 New
      • 30
      • 4
      +26
      The Pacific Fleet has 4 BODs of Project 1155, which are 30 +++ years old, patched-rolled and running on parole, and 2 new corvettes of Project 20380 “Perfect” and “Loud”. Ancient IPC I do not take into account. If the Amur Shipyard receives an order for 10 corvettes of project 20380 for the Pacific Fleet, the situation will improve in the future. After the epic with the construction of the Perfect, the Amur Shipbuilding Plant somehow accelerated life-giving with the construction of 2 and 3 corvettes.
      1. maidan.izrailovich 10 March 2020 03: 57 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        In the Pacific Fleet there are 4 BOD project 1155 ....

        In the ranks of three. The youngest "Admiral Panteleev".
        Another representative of the project 1155 "Marshal Shaposhnikov" is under modernization and reclassified to frigate.
    2. smart ass 9 March 2020 14: 04 New
      • 17
      • 10
      +7
      Invented two new names for the ships left to build
    3. Grigory_45 9 March 2020 21: 21 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Quote: Whatislove
      And the ships are at least new

      where are the new ones from? there from the new - only two toothless corvettes pr 20380
  2. Name Surname 9 March 2020 14: 00 New
    • 8
    • 8
    0
    2 corvettes, 2 BOD + 2 rusty MPC?
    Unclear somehow
    1. kepmor 9 March 2020 14: 33 New
      • 20
      • 1
      +19
      the news is about nothing ...
      in the organizational plan, the KPUG is formed once or twice ... there would be serviceable iron and the “flagship” more or less prepared ...
      any commander, and sometimes even NS, of the brigade (division) of PLO ships is a priori commander of the KPUG (commander of the search forces) ... without this, there is no permission to control the connection ...
      1. Krasnoyarsk 9 March 2020 14: 44 New
        • 20
        • 5
        +15
        Quote: kepmor
        the news is about nothing ...

        And not news at all. It is not clear what. Formed from what? Pacific Fleet received new ships? At least 6 units. Not. So what are they made of? Of the old units? And why didn’t they form it before? Previously, the submarine’s submarine was not dangerous?
        In a word - another PUK ... in the waters of the Pacific Ocean.
    2. figwam 9 March 2020 14: 37 New
      • 2
      • 8
      -6
      Recently it was like that ...
      1. Sailor 9 March 2020 20: 54 New
        • 7
        • 2
        +5
        This was recently during the years of my service 89-92.
  3. rocket757 9 March 2020 14: 01 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    In general, the underwater power of potential opponents is becoming more and more modern.
    They must be opposed by modern, well-equipped, armed forces of the fleet.
    Question - And what do they have? And what is and will be with us?
    1. Sailor 9 March 2020 20: 57 New
      • 9
      • 4
      +5
      We will have nothing, except in the best case, corvettes, and new yachts of GDP friends at the price of cruisers, and they have a fleet!
      1. rocket757 9 March 2020 21: 19 New
        • 5
        • 10
        -5
        So categorically declare, this is absolutely faith in the country's leadership to lose ....
        In matters of security, territorial integrity of the country, not everything is so sour. There is reason to believe that there is their place to be. Not all is lost yet. We will see.
        1. Sailor 9 March 2020 21: 23 New
          • 9
          • 5
          +4
          Yes, you look around, everything is bent, and we are told from the stands that we are ahead of the rest. A few years ago I was an ardent supporter of GDP, and when the veil left my eyes I saw that they were leading us to the slaughter.
          1. rocket757 9 March 2020 22: 02 New
            • 2
            • 6
            -4
            I have not been, no, and will not be a supporter of THIS AUTHORITY.
            No illusions, expectations, respectively, no disappointments!
            I just really appreciate all the facts.
            This power is not going to give anything of fundamental importance to anyone, but for this, including need appropriate strength, economic and military ... about the support of the people, the issue is very controversial, but they can’t do without this support so far.
            That's all, this is an objective reality.
        2. Grigory_45 9 March 2020 21: 24 New
          • 8
          • 6
          +2
          Quote: rocket757
          So categorically declare, it’s absolutely a belief in the country's leadership to lose

          and it (the manual) even hit a finger on a finger, so that the opinion changes ???

          Quote: rocket757
          In matters of security, the territorial integrity of the country, not everything is so sour.

          You looked at the composition of Pacific Fleet and software? there you will not look without tears. He (the fleet) will soon become a brigade of inflatable motor boats ....
          1. rocket757 9 March 2020 22: 06 New
            • 2
            • 5
            -3
            What and how will be done, I can’t say ... because
            how the degree of greed and redneck / s / cannot be measured in anything, but they will try to save themselves, not to let anything out of their hands! They will do at least the minimum .... what exactly, we will see.
  4. Ugolek 9 March 2020 14: 01 New
    • 20
    • 1
    +19
    It looks like the case when there is a name, but no ships, unfortunately.
    1. alexmach 9 March 2020 14: 20 New
      • 6
      • 3
      +3
      Well, at least from an organizational point of view, they pay attention to the issue. It is clear that the ships from this did not increase at all.
      1. bayard 9 March 2020 16: 14 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Well, how has it not increased? And "Thundering" (type 20385)? Accurate should prepare for the transition along with the head “Varshavyanka”. The Amur plant still picks something ... This year (sort of) they promise "Shaposhnikov" (1155) to return from modernization ...
        Sarcasm of course, but still something is dripping.
        And the new "anti-submarine strike groups" ... after all, they may also appear on the old 1124 IPCs - there was a message that they were going to return all the old men to the system, it was apparently hot without PLO ...
        1. alexmach 9 March 2020 16: 50 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          Well, how has it not increased? And "Thundering" (type 20385)?

          Well, it’s not yet handed over to the fleet, it didn’t arrive at the Pacific Fleet like everyone else, and if you look into the future, then there is also Aldar Tsydenzhapov on the way.
      2. Grigory_45 9 March 2020 21: 28 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Quote: alexmach
        Well, at least from an organizational point of view, they pay attention to the issue.

        from an organizational point of view, nothing has changed since the days of the USSR. Such a connection could be formed in a couple of days, by order. It would be from ...
        By the way, since the Soviet times, the Pacific Fleet had the 44th brigade of anti-submarine ships (which included 4 BOD). What didn’t you like? The brigade disbanded into three groups?
        1. alexmach 9 March 2020 21: 49 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          What didn’t you like? The brigade disbanded into three groups?

          Probably preparing for a change in the payroll and the emergence of new ships. In the near future, 20380 will most likely be the main workhorses of these groups. BOD, God forbid, upgrade according to the Shaposhnikov project. But then again, with this modernization, anti-submarine weapons do not modernize in any way. Detection means I mean
  5. novel66 9 March 2020 14: 12 New
    • 7
    • 5
    +2
    suddenly, out of nowhere .... lol
  6. Smart 9 March 2020 14: 14 New
    • 10
    • 2
    +8
    From the ten available units of the crew, various combinations are created for all possible threats.
    So one and the same ship, depending on the goals set, can be in anti-submarine, landing, defensive, convoy and other formations ...
    1. knn54 9 March 2020 14: 54 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Therefore, two PUGs, one for even, the other for odd.
  7. RUSLAN 9 March 2020 14: 35 New
    • 12
    • 6
    +6
    Uriyayaya! Well, now the adversary will definitely be pushing from us ... Now the kaaak will be formed by the headquarters of the anti-submarine strike groups command, the kaaak will be added ranks and posts to the swollen commander of the Pacific Fleet ... It’s a pity only the ship’s composition will remain the same .. .
  8. Adimius38 9 March 2020 14: 48 New
    • 14
    • 3
    +11
    interestingly, not a single new anti-submarine was built in 30 years, but how loud TWO Ship Attack Groups sound loud .....
  9. Adimius38 9 March 2020 14: 57 New
    • 8
    • 3
    +5
    The president said it’s enough of Hurray ... And they continue to do the same. Not a single new anti-submarine! point. And the Soviet old run on parole. For example, BOD Admiral Vinogradov, it is interesting in which year it underwent repairs and modernization, I don’t remember something. Admiral Tributz is the same song, well, Admiral Panteleev remained the more recent of the three put into operation in 1992. Again, there is no data on its modernization and repair, and since 1992, nearly 28 years have passed.
  10. Protos 9 March 2020 14: 57 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
    Ancient IPC I do not take into account

    Very much in vain!
    According to the results of modernization, 8 MPK of project 1124M will receive Package-NK and Minotaur-M
    The start of modernization is the end of 2019. yes
    1. kepmor 9 March 2020 15: 30 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      But what's the point ??? ...
      - the “albatross” building was originally designed for 25-30 years of operation ... the 26th is already on the youngest ... and there are old people of another 84-86 ...
      - the Nikolaev gas turbines at all for a long time in conservation ... at GDGD M-507A the "cat cried" motor resources for each compartment ... with DGDG the situation will be even finer ... about bottom-outboard fittings it’s better not to remember ...
      all this is bliss ... A packet with the Minotaur is like Botox injections to a decrepit old man ... a blush appears, but walking anyway with a wand ...
  11. Radikal 9 March 2020 15: 06 New
    • 15
    • 8
    +7
    Anti-submarine strike groups formed in Kamchatka

    The mountain gave birth ... a mouse! This “news” does not deserve another comment. Profanity with imitation is the current state of the country. sad
    1. Paranoid50 9 March 2020 15: 17 New
      • 9
      • 7
      +2
      Quote: Radikal
      Profanity with imitation is the current state of the country.

      It seems to have been confused with their own fortune. yes
      1. fk7777777 9 March 2020 19: 55 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Well, general, but the whole gosh, they probably suck the enemy to the impossibility of moving, and the enemy capitulates, and they will be upgraded to marshals.
  12. AAK
    AAK 9 March 2020 15: 47 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    To "minus" the Pacific Fleet (not counting the launch of ICBMs with SSBNs from the berths in Vilyuchinsk) now, unfortunately, more than enough the Navy of Japan and South Korea
  13. fa2998 9 March 2020 15: 51 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    Quote: Clever man
    Invented two new names for the ships left to build

    Soon we will order ships in China. They will bake pies. Yes, it will strike you with pride, but we will ride Chinese cars, but all the shops will be overwhelmed with Chinese goods. We will survive the shame, but we will build ships ourselves. We will build 5 times longer, and we’ll rewrite the budgets more than once. lol hi
    1. Adimius38 9 March 2020 16: 37 New
      • 6
      • 3
      +3
      in our case, destroyers have to be ordered in China for a long time, because they cannot build and design nothing. If we start designing, we will design at best in five years, five more years we will look for power where to build, and we will build the lead ship for ten years, and it will take 20 years to build a new destroyer in a single copy. In the best case, what we can master in ten years is Super Gorshkov, but at such a pace as we master it we will also wait for the first lead ship of the year, so 2030. Therefore, we must definitely order warships where all the infrastructure for building them is created and not problems with their construction. In principle, we can saturate the ships ourselves, both with weapons and radio-technical means, the main thing of the hull. There are many cases in history when Russia ordered warships at foreign shipyards
      1. Aag
        Aag 9 March 2020 17: 07 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        ... And under this "article" not a single encouraging comment ...
        1. Adimius38 9 March 2020 17: 40 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Because they are beginning to see clearly, everyone is tired of it Urya Urya, even the president said, I do not need cheers, I need a result. And in fact, we have only one frigate 22350 in service, and five have yet to be built. Three frigates 11356, and about a dozen corvettes. The rest is all Soviet in the main part is pretty worn out and needs a full repair and modernization. For example, the cruiser Moscow drove the old man in such a way that they are now having difficulty restoring his course, and yet such ships need full repair and modernization and they need to be protected since we cannot build anything like that in such tonnage.
          1. Aag
            Aag 9 March 2020 17: 49 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Well-read, heard ... And it is depressing.
          2. alexmach 9 March 2020 21: 44 New
            • 2
            • 2
            0
            And in fact, we have only one frigate 22350 in service, and five have yet to be built.

            Admiral Kasatonov will be handed over this year.
            "Golovko" promised to launch this year. Not so sad
            Three frigates 11356, and about a dozen corvettes
            12, for now, and there are rumors of an extension of the series.
    2. fk7777777 9 March 2020 19: 57 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Well, Aviks, they’ll only have to order from them, from us all specialists left for them from us ...
  14. huntsman650 9 March 2020 16: 51 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Pictured BOD Northern Fleet))) "Severrmorsk".
  15. Protos 9 March 2020 17: 44 New
    • 1
    • 6
    -5
    Quote: Name Surname
    Corvette, 2 BOD + 2 rusty MPC?
    Unclear somehow

    2 frigates project project 22350
    2 corvettes of the project 20380
    1 corvette of the project 20385
    4 BOD
    8 IPC
    5 maximum concentration limits
    In total, until 2024, it is planned to put into operation 2 more frigates, 4 corvettes, 7 minesweepers, 1 SSBN, 6 diesel-electric submarines, a number of auxiliary and support vessels yes
  16. FomaKinyaev 9 March 2020 17: 53 New
    • 11
    • 2
    +9
    This news should be called like this: “once we had a completely normal fleet in the Far East and Kamchatka and in Vladik and many more where, and then we sold everything, left people, and now we needed a fleet there and we are all failed to sell, we are trying to create some kind of group. " Personally, I see it this way. They formed .....
    1. fk7777777 9 March 2020 19: 59 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Well, Peter’s fluffs, in some places they stayed, and they say pine trees on the mast can be put like ..
  17. rudolff 9 March 2020 20: 03 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    If you are very perverted, such a group can also be formed with diesel-electric submarines.
  18. Grigory_45 9 March 2020 21: 13 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    Anti-submarine strike groups formed in Kamchatka
    I wonder what means (what ships they entered) ???

    At the Pacific Fleet today 1 RKR, 4 BOD, 2 destroyers, 2 corvettes. This is a list number.

    The missile cruiser is Varangian

    BOD - Admiral Tributs, Marshal Shaposhnikov, Admiral Vinogradov, Admiral Panteleev - all in the 44th brigade of anti-submarine ships. These BODs are over 30 years old, and they do not coexist with modern requirements - only Shaposhnikov and Tribits are really combat-ready

    EM - two ancient Sarychs, Stormy and Fast. Third, Fearless, not on track. By themselves, these EMs cannot provide PLO

    2 corvettes - Perfect and Loud, the only modern ships. Which, again, do not correspond to anything, neither in terms of reliability, nor in armament.

    We do not take the IPC into account, because their combat value is insignificant.

    And from what groups were formed, if not paper ??? Their two or three stale BOD, ship to strike group ???