The leaders of the world arms market are named

70

Between 2015 and 2019 weapons world exports increased by 5,5 percent compared to the period from 2010 to 2014.

At the same time, the United States and the Russian Federation took the first lines among the world's largest arms exporters.



This is stated in the report of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) on the state of the global arms market.

Although Russia ranks second in the world after the United States in the ranking of arms exporters, in 2015-2019 it reduced sales by 18 percent. If the Russian Federation in 2010-2014 occupied 27 percent of all global arms exports, now this figure has dropped to 21 percent.

Most of all, this drop was influenced by a decrease in the volume of arms supplied to India, which switched to a policy of diversifying sources of arms supplies. Thus, the volume of deliveries of Russian weapons to this country decreased by 41 percent. Significantly increased arms exports to India from Israel and France. The latter increased the sale of New Delhi weapons by more than eight times.

Today, India ranks second in the ranking of the world's largest arms buyers, and Saudi Arabia is in first place in the world among arms importers.
70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    9 March 2020 12: 18
    The ratings of this market are different, but there are already ratings where China is in second place ...
    1. +1
      9 March 2020 12: 26
      And the link to the source of these "estimates" was under the comments of the VO, from where, in fact, you got it. Either "Inosmi", or "Free Press". Very reliable.
    2. +1
      9 March 2020 13: 08
      In the first place are the sanctions of the Yankees.
    3. +2
      9 March 2020 15: 31
      Quote: svp67
      but there are already estimates where China is in second place ...

      Apparently - Chinese? :))))
    4. AAK
      +1
      9 March 2020 15: 40
      China and India (which, in comparison with the Russian Federation, have long been, as it were, not "third world countries") want from us not so much weapons as technology, all other sales - exclusively to the "third world" for palm oil and tomatoes
      1. AAK
        -1
        9 March 2020 15: 51
        I will add, the S-400 to Turkey is just a variant of a "wedding gift", but, alas - "There will be no wedding!" (With "Caucasian captive")
  2. +4
    9 March 2020 12: 37
    What to do, the arms market is very serious for any economy.
    The struggle for markets, contracts, goes without any rules!
    Stripes generally sent all the limits of decency far and forever, it seems.
    What to do, what to do ...... it is necessary to work more thoroughly, to do better first of all. There is no other way.
    1. Aag
      +2
      9 March 2020 12: 46
      I hope to be mistaken, but it seems that somewhere on the site it was slipping that sometimes we buy "castrated" versions of weapons in our aircrafts, and buyers demand all-inclusive, all "stuffing" ... Those who know, please clarify.
      1. -3
        9 March 2020 13: 14
        Quote: AAG
        and buyers demand all-inclusive, all "stuffing" ... Knowledgeable, clarify, please.

        All "stuffing" is a Russian warrior. It is not for sale. And so: At the expense of the Indians we got the Su-30SM2, For the UAE - Pantsir, At the expense of the Koreans Vityaz (by the way, surprising. The fleet received this system before the land). At the expense of the Chinese, the export line S-400. All systems in the Russian army are a cut above
      2. +2
        9 March 2020 13: 25
        Quote: AAG
        sometimes we buy "castrated" versions of weapons in our aircrafts, and buyers demand all-inclusive, all "stuffing".

        All this is objective / subjective.
        Do you need an air conditioner for the equipment that is supplied to "warm edges"? And the one that serves in our north is needed?
        And then, sho this our "northern" technique can get on exercises in the same "warm lands" and OUR guys will be soared in it !!! this is how to understand / accept?
        You can find other cases of "saving" on conveniences for OUR fighters.
        Technical aspects also take place !!! save, install subsystems, those that are, we release ourselves, and we put to the foreign customer what they order.
        For example, French thermal imagers and the like put on export equipment, because they can order spare parts in France themselves, and for our own needs, the French will sell figs!
        Something like this. Then think for yourselves, sound declarations or empty chatter!
        I believe that the equipment supplied to OUR army, in terms of fundamentally important characteristics, has at least not the worst parameters! And in many ways the BEST ..... and "rolls of toilet paper" in the kit, you can, but ........
      3. +1
        9 March 2020 14: 14
        Quote: AAG
        I hope to be mistaken, but, it seems, somewhere here on the site it was slipping that sometimes we buy "castrated" versions of weapons in our aircrafts, and buyers demand all-inclusive, all "stuffing"

        alas, there were such precedents. You can recall the T-90, BMP-3 tanks for the United Arab Emirates and for Azerbaijan, which left in a better configuration than the MO ordered for their aircraft. You can recall the purchase of Ka-28 helicopters for naval aviation of the Russian Federation (Ka-28 is an export version of the Ka-27 helicopter castrated by avionics).
        There is one reason for this - the lack of allocated funds (or the fact that they do not reach the addressee, settling in someone’s pockets)

        The only thing that pleases is not general (procurement of equipment in a simplified version). All the same, some types of equipment are still banned for export and can only be installed on equipment entering the Russian troops. In the USSR, all polls exported weapons were distinguished by reduced capabilities. Now they begin to depart from this rule.
      4. The comment was deleted.
    2. +6
      9 March 2020 12: 47
      Quote: rocket757
      Stripes generally sent all the limits of decency far and forever, it seems.

      "Fair competition", when potential buyers are threatened with sanctions, helps to "snatch" any rot at triple the price.
      1. -1
        9 March 2020 13: 32
        Eugene soldier
        Striped ones make a good, in many ways, technique ... at the one that they have been doing for a long time!
        But with new products, everything is very EXPENSIVE, in the first place, and the "raw", overly sophisticated, often .... not so Schaub all and immediately fits.
        But "sell", count it, they are doing it now! I don’t know how long it will last for them ???
        On the other hand, it is not ..... in short, their allies and satellites trade in "loyalty".
  3. +2
    9 March 2020 12: 44
    Some mythical estimates ...
    The Americans are the first, and we are the second - there seems to be a reason for pride!
    Where is the percentage of the global arms market share. Indeed, if we assume that the Americans have 90% 5%, we and all other countries together have the remaining five percent - then in this case our second place is not comme il faut.
    1. -6
      9 March 2020 13: 02
      Quote: Smart
      Where is the percentage of the global arms market share. Indeed, if we assume that the Americans have 90% 5%, we and all other countries together have the remaining five percent - then in this case our second place is not comme il faut.

      And if the quantity is multiplied by American prices? The same Patriot costs twice as much as the S-400. And for Poland, so three times. Moreover, pay for American satellites; otherwise, you will shoot down civilian cars, as was the case with the Saudis recently. One Rafal for India as many as five Su-30
      1. -1
        9 March 2020 14: 58
        From whom did he grab a minaret? Imagine 5 Dryers in a full harness and one Rafal with three PTBs. Same price. But the whole of Kashmir will be cleared in a couple of sorties
    2. +4
      9 March 2020 15: 04
      I have the data you are interested in for 2017. hi

      1. 0
        9 March 2020 15: 26
        United Kind BAE System sold to Hans. So it’s not important to give 3% bully
    3. 0
      9 March 2020 16: 27
      Have you studied the article? It shows the share in the global arms market.
  4. +3
    9 March 2020 12: 50
    Quote: Smart
    Some mythical estimates ...
    The Americans are the first, and we are the second - there seems to be a reason for pride!
    Where is the percentage of the global arms market share. Indeed, if we assume that the Americans have 90% 5%, we and all other countries together have the remaining five percent - then in this case our second place is not comme il faut.

    Total US arms sales were 76% higher than the deals of the world's second largest arms exporter, Russia. In general, the United States strengthened its leadership in global arms trade - over the past five years, Washington has increased sales by almost a quarter (23%)
    1. Aag
      0
      9 March 2020 13: 00
      ... And we are again about the economy ... With all the attendant: education, science, goal-setting with your diet ... No, I'm not old ... gundos. I am a "vintage gas generator" :-).
      1. Aag
        +2
        9 March 2020 13: 04
        ... "goal-setting-upbringing" ..... here is an example of the primacy of the Chinese I. Intelligence over Russian thought ... :-)))
        1. 0
          9 March 2020 15: 35
          T9 is a "product" of Google. amerikosov, chinesi have nothing to do with ... sometimes it will give out, at least stop, at least fall ... you always knew shitty Russian ... Although T9 on the platform from small soft is more adequate ..
  5. +1
    9 March 2020 12: 55
    In the USA, in 2015-2019, the volume of military exports increased by 23% compared to the previous period, which to date has provided them with a 36 percent share in global arms sales. Deliveries of the main types of weapons were carried out in 96 countries.

    “In the past five years, half of US arms exports went to the Middle East, and half of those shipments went to Saudi Arabia,” said Peter Weseman, senior research fellow at SIPRI. “At the same time, the demand for modern military aircraft has increased, especially in Europe, Australia, Japan and Taiwan.”
  6. -1
    9 March 2020 12: 56
    In 2015-2019, Russia supplied weapons to 47 states. 55% of this volume came from the main partners in this area - India, China and Algeria. In terms of regional distribution, 57% of military supplies were to Asia and Oceania, 19% to the Middle East, 17% to African countries, 5,7% to European countries and 0,8% to countries of both Americas.
    1. Aag
      +2
      9 March 2020 13: 20
      What didn’t I like? What am I wrong? I don’t like many realities either. But I am guilty of this to a much lesser extent.
  7. +1
    9 March 2020 13: 20
    Quote: Balbes
    Quote: AAG
    Somehow it warns, it wouldn’t work out like with resources: we are building gas pipelines, our gas depth is not gasified, we export oil, and the prices for the internal solarium drive the prices of all goods, except for everything else, up ...

    Well, there are already questions for our oligarchs who are overweight ..
    These bastards will not get enough .. Capitalism, damn it! Elite form, but not yet evening
    The slogan "Proletarians, unite of all countries!" .. More in the subject

    Brains need to have. Is always.
    All oil industry, gas, energy, arms production, and nuclear engineering in Russia are state-owned. If in the USSR the gas price in the country was 4 kopecks per cubic meter, then, therefore, with an abundance of gas production, we were the least gasified throughout the territory. Which one and the diot will drive the pipe into the Krasnoyarsk taiga, if there are 100 thousand residents across the tundra. Thousands of kilometers of pipe. It will never pay off.
    Now that domestic prices have become quite close to world prices, gasification has begun to rise, and has reached 80% in cities and 30% across the country. If prices are made global, gasification will be higher than anywhere else. Why drive to Paris if the price is the same in Voronezh?
    The price tag, inside the cheap, behind the cordon, rewards crime. Remember the Far Eastern border chief forbidding pushing fish to Japan was blown up in a 12-story building. together with neighbors? It will allow - it will live, it will forbid, it will observe the interests of the state, it will be destroyed. Equality of prices will make everyone patriots. Here the question is not in prices, but in wages should be.
    And to finish off you, with your delirium, read:
    1. Aag
      +4
      9 March 2020 13: 36
      Let’s be without rudeness. Please. Keep the site adequate?
  8. -1
    9 March 2020 13: 55
    In the period from 2015 to 2019, arms exports in the world increased by 5,5 percent compared to the period from 2010 to 2014.
    And here's how this growth looks in percent(from the same source)
  9. -2
    9 March 2020 14: 55
    Quote: AAG
    Let’s be without rudeness. Please. Keep the site adequate?

    And is it not rudeness from his hohryak, nor the boom-boom in the economy and production structure of the country to shit on her?
    1. Aag
      +3
      9 March 2020 16: 30
      I repeat, sorry ... Let's go without rudeness. Perhaps I'm not a "boom-boom in the economy", because I don't watch it, I don't feel it, I hear a lot about it ... Don't tell me where you can get a cubic meter of gas for 6 rubles upload?
  10. -1
    9 March 2020 18: 12
    Quote: AAG
    I repeat, sorry ... Let's go without rudeness. Perhaps I'm not a "boom-boom in the economy", because I don't watch it, I don't feel it, I hear a lot about it ... Don't tell me where you can get a cubic meter of gas for 6 rubles upload?

    I upload, in the Penza region. To be exact, then 5,772 rubles per cubic meter. In a month, heating (own boiler), gas water heater, stove costs me two, in a 54-meter apartment, in January 311 cubic meters 5,772 rubles / m³ 1795,09 rubles.
    Didn’t I write clearly that in our troubles it’s not the fists-world-eaters who are to blame. It is IMPOSSIBLE to have low domestic prices for goods.
    It was in the USSR that the borders were locked. And they guarded domestic prices for raw materials, energy. everything else. Now there are practically no borders. Imagine. that in your city suddenly began to sell bread at 18 cents. You will starve to death. Firstly, they will not bring it to you, there are no boobs, you have to sell 18 kopecks, and next to it, in the next, 18 rubles. Second, even if someone began to bake it with you, he will take it to a neighboring one. There are 18 rubles. And if he is a patriot, and will carry to the store, you yourself will buy and sell. at the neighbors. And so that your city does not die out, you need borders around the city, and sell in stores by registration. His own. Around Russia, the border is 60 thousand kilometers.
    I repeat, not low prices are needed, but high salaries.
    But how do you get paid as much as a Frenchman gets? You work on the devil knows what kind of machine and make the Soviet TV "Horizon". That nobody needs. And your productivity is hundreds of times less. And this requires a completely different production.
    Clearly spelling out? Understand this, do not wind the snot and curse. Learn, and you will be much more sad.
    1. +1
      9 March 2020 18: 37
      Quote: Victor March 47
      To be exact, then 5,772 rubles per cubic meter.

      Strange .. And at gas stations "Technical propane" - 22.5 rubles per liter.
      "In 1 liter of pure liquefied propane 0,263 m3 of free propane gas."

      So how much is 1 cubic meter gas?
    2. Aag
      +2
      10 March 2020 20: 06
      -Victor March 47: "Learn and you will be much more sad."
      Already learned, it’s not fun for a long time. So at what price do residents of regions buy gas, by the way, where do they get it (Krasnoyarsk Territory, Irkutsk Region)? It is more profitable to sell to China.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. +1
    9 March 2020 18: 58
    Quote: Saxahorse
    Quote: Victor March 47
    To be exact, then 5,772 rubles per cubic meter.

    Strange .. And at gas stations "Technical propane" - 22.5 rubles per liter.
    "In 1 liter of pure liquefied propane 0,263 m3 of free propane gas."

    So how much is 1 cubic meter gas?

    Compression and liquefaction done for free? Further. Propane and methane (natural gas) have different calories. And you cannot directly compare them.
  13. +1
    9 March 2020 19: 14
    Quote: mvg
    Excuse me, where are we leaders in the arms market? Did I miss something? S-400/300 have not shot down anyone yet?

    By this logic, not a single nuclear submarine has ever fired ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads.
    1. mvg
      -1
      9 March 2020 21: 39
      not a single submarine has ever fired ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads

      Let it go. Just. And here we are shooting down at launches, targets converted from old missiles and planes. For example MiG-17/19.
      But the BRDS with a range of up to 2500 km, as stated at the S-400, we did not shoot down. But we also declare that the iskanders do not go astray. Contradict themselves.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  14. +1
    10 March 2020 23: 27
    Quote: AAG
    -Victor March 47: "Learn and you will be much more sad."
    Already learned, it’s not fun for a long time. So at what price do residents of regions buy gas, by the way, where do they get it (Krasnoyarsk Territory, Irkutsk Region)? It is more profitable to sell to China.

    Have you read and watched the table? Is everything right there? And the reasons understood where, and how to get out of the situation, you know? If you know, go ahead.