MiG-31 regiment with hypersonic "Daggers" deployed in the Krasnoyarsk Territory

MiG-31 regiment with hypersonic "Daggers" deployed in the Krasnoyarsk Territory

MiG-31 fighter interceptors with dagger hypersonic systems will take up combat duty in the Central Military District. This was stated by the commander of the Central Military District Alexander Lapin.


According to the commander, until 2024 the district will re-equip the MiG-31 fighter-interceptors from the Kansky regiment in the Krasnoyarsk Territory under the carriers of the dagger hypersonic complex.

In accordance with the equipment plan, we are re-equipping the regiment with dagger hypersonic missiles until 2024

- said Lapin.

Earlier it was reported that the military department decided to deploy hypersonic dagger missiles on the Kola Peninsula and Kamchatka to cover, including the Northern Sea Route. Most likely, under the hypersonic RK "Dagger" will be converted aircraft of two military units from the marine aviation The Russian Navy, armed with MIG-31 interceptors, is in Monchegorsk in the Murmansk Region and in Yelizovo in Kamchatka.

At the end of November this year, the Ministry of Defense reported on past tests of the dagger hypersonic missile system in arctic conditions. The missile was launched by the MiG-31K for a target located at the Pemboy training ground to the north-east of Vorkuta, which it successfully hit.

The newest Russian dagger air company includes the MiG-31K fighter-interceptor, specially upgraded as a carrier of a hypersonic missile, which is an aircraft version of the Iskander-M OTRK missile.

According to the official information of the Ministry of Defense, one MiG-31K squadron with “Daggers” has been on duty in the Southern Military District since December 2017, and since April 2018, the MiG-31K aircraft have regular flights over the Black and Caspian Seas.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. svp67 27 February 2020 13: 27 New
    • 17
    • 6
    +11
    It remains only to understand who these MiGs will be “threatened” with with their “Daggers” from the Krasnoyarsk Territory ...
    1. Sofa expert 27 February 2020 13: 28 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Probably neighbors from the south
    2. Nastia makarova 27 February 2020 13: 34 New
      • 2
      • 12
      -10
      how to whom ??? NATO!!
      1. svp67 27 February 2020 13: 39 New
        • 6
        • 2
        +4
        Quote: Nastia Makarova
        how to whom ??? NATO!!

        Explain.
        1. Hammer 27 February 2020 13: 48 New
          • 15
          • 1
          +14
          Romario_Argo is right. Just as I see it is not a reluctance to escalate the political situation, it is being pumped beyond measure without us. Most likely, it is a desire not to substitute such a valuable resource (I would say strategic) for the first disarming strike. Near Krasnoyarsk adversary they can only get ICBMs. And if the ICBM was used, then aviation is already unnecessary, and to all. In general, they are there for safety, and transferring them to the desired direction is a matter of some hours.
          1. Kalmar 27 February 2020 14: 47 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Quote: Hammer
            Most likely, the desire is not to substitute such a valuable resource (I would say strategic) for the first disarming strike

            It seems to me that you greatly overestimate the value of this resource. In fact, the “Dagger" is a kind of replacement of the infantry ballistic missile system for the first time (the INF Treaty doesn’t work for us anymore).

            Quote: Hammer
            Near Krasnoyarsk adversary they can only get ICBMs.

            It depends on whom to consider an adversary. The base in Krasnoyarsk suggests that in this case in this role we see our Chinese friends who have not restrained themselves with all kinds of INF Treaty all these years.
            1. Hammer 28 February 2020 03: 05 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: Kalmar
              You greatly overestimate the value of this resource. In fact, the “Dagger" is a kind of replacement of the infantry ballistic missile system for the first time (the INF Treaty doesn’t work for us anymore).

              Not at all. At the moment, the Mig-31 / Dagger complex cannot be overestimated. Including because, as you put it, "a kind of replacement of the BRDS." Given the ability to carry nuclear warheads, but with incomparably greater mobility than ground-based systems, the Mig-31 / Dagger can be classified as a strategic deterrent. It is the possibility of causing inevitable (!!!) and unacceptable damage to the entire depth of the European theater of war and the Asian theater of war (Japan, South Korea, etc.) and transfers it from the category of conventional high-precision weapons to strategic. And not for the "first time." One regiment with the MiG-31 with the "Daggers", taking into account its mobility, can more than replace several ground-based infantry regiment regiments. This is not a frail economic component ...

              Quote: Kalmar
              It depends on whom to consider an adversary. The base in Krasnoyarsk suggests that in this case in this role we see our Chinese friends who have not restrained themselves with all kinds of INF Treaty all these years.

              Relax. At this historical stage and the foreseeable future, China is not an enemy to us. Not a friend of course. But there is no reason for China to attack us now. Enemies are enough for the Chinese even without us. China now needs China as an ally. And we will be needed for a long time. Pure pragmatism, with both sides. Just as we hide Daggers from the western "partners" in Krasnoyarsk, the Chinese are hiding their ground ICBMs near our borders. Under the umbrella of our air defense and missile defense. And not only this.
              Do not look for a problem where it does not exist.
              1. Kalmar 28 February 2020 09: 44 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: Hammer
                the possibility of causing inevitable (!!!) and unacceptable damage to the entire depth of the European theater of war and the Asian theater of war (Japan, South Korea, etc.)

                Inevitability, and even to the "whole depth" is debatable. For the rocket itself, a launch range of 1500 km is indicated, the rest is the combat radius of the carrier, which still needs to be somehow protected from air defense.

                Quote: Hammer
                But there is no reason for China to attack us now.

                If so to argue, then NATO also does not have such a need, we don’t interfere with their particular lives. And so, if you look at the post-war history, there is a feeling that there were more direct clashes between us and China than with NATO countries. Well yes it is, thoughts out loud.
        2. Nastia makarova 27 February 2020 13: 53 New
          • 1
          • 4
          -3
          that from the west, Nato could not destroy the airfield
          1. svp67 27 February 2020 14: 03 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Quote: Nastia Makarova
            that from the west, Nato could not destroy the airfield

            and .... Then what? So she can do it from the East and the North.
            1. Nastia makarova 27 February 2020 14: 12 New
              • 2
              • 3
              -1
              will not get the base in Krasnoyarsk
          2. SovAr238A 27 February 2020 15: 21 New
            • 5
            • 3
            +2
            Quote: Nastia Makarova
            that from the west, Nato could not destroy the airfield


            So let's move all the troops from the borders to the Krasnoyarsk Territory according to your logic ...
            That the adversary could not destroy them!
            1. Nastia makarova 27 February 2020 15: 39 New
              • 0
              • 8
              -8
              dagger carriers are strategic troops !!!
              1. SovAr238A 27 February 2020 19: 03 New
                • 3
                • 1
                +2
                Quote: Nastia Makarova
                dagger carriers are strategic troops !!!

                Suddenly...

                Do the Ministry of Defense and Shoigu know about this?
                1. Nastia makarova 28 February 2020 07: 33 New
                  • 0
                  • 4
                  -4
                  of course!!! a dagger is a strategic weapon
            2. YOUR 28 February 2020 04: 36 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              They moved away from the Chinese border. All fortified areas destroyed. The Chinese are not. For example, in the Dalnerechensk region, our fortified area was completely destroyed, but the Chinese on the opposite bank were not touched and continued to be on duty. They are friends. True, for some reason, their Shenyang Military District is becoming more and more “fattening,” or rather, now it is the Northern Military District. Reminds nothing, no associations? Well, there are northern barbarians, our lands in the north ....
              1. CSKA 28 February 2020 11: 25 New
                • 3
                • 2
                +1
                Quote: YOUR
                True, for some reason, their Shenyang Military District is becoming more and more “fattening,” or rather, now it is the Northern Military District.

                What are you? And what do you think means gaining weight?
                1. YOUR 28 February 2020 12: 41 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Fattening means that first of all it receives modern weapons and equipment, and also the number of troops is increasing. It was 750, now more than 000. Is that clear?
                  1. CSKA 3 March 2020 17: 38 New
                    • 0
                    • 3
                    -3
                    Quote: YOUR
                    Fattening means that first of all it receives modern weapons and equipment

                    All districts, without exception, receive modern military equipment.
                    Quote: YOUR
                    It was 750, now more than 000. Is that clear?

                    Where does the data not tell?
                    Quote: YOUR
                    Reminds nothing, no associations? Well there are northern barbarians, our lands in the north

                    I’ve heard about 20 years ago that China wants to attack, that it is preparing for the capture, but it’s all gone. Khramchikhin wrote everything, though now he is stuck. Still, do not calm down.
            3. bayard 28 February 2020 04: 53 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Quote: SovAr238A
              So let's move all the troops from the borders to the Krasnoyarsk Territory according to your logic ...
              That the adversary could not destroy them!

              Already.
              And how long .
              In the Krasnoyarsk Territory, our ICBMs are just away from the sudden and disarming.
              And the MiG-31K from near Krasnoyarsk at any time can be quickly relocated: in Primorye, to Kamchatka, in a southerly direction. And if necessary, he can deliver the first blow at once - having refueled in the air during the flight and shot at least over the Caucasus or the Caspian (in the Middle East, Western Asia, and the Eastern Mediterranean).
              This is a very flexible and long-range weapon of a strategic purpose (with nuclear warheads). Taking into account the fact that the industry issues 20 MiG-31s ​​each year from modernization, and the need for such interceptors is somehow not observed (the Su-35 will do it better), then all the remaining MiG-31s ​​that can be stored can be upgraded with daggers " Such an upgrade, by the way, will be much cheaper and easier than a full-fledged interceptor. Therefore, one can expect from the arsenal of such products from 60 to 100 pcs. And these are only carriers, and they can do up to 12-16 sorties per day (according to the standard) (every hour and a half), of course, with a change of crew ...
              No one, of course, will not be able to withstand such a regime, but even two or three sorties of such a regiment (20-24 sides) with special-purpose products can destroy the entire infrastructure of a strong medium-sized state.
              One regiment.
              And as such a carrier, the MiG-31 will be able to serve for a long time, and with great benefit to the Fatherland.
              And this - the Krasnoyarsk base, will be essentially a reserve. A kind of regiment of operational-strategic reserve and quick response.
              And the other bases are completely forward-based: Kola, Kamchatka, Ciscaucasia.
              MiG-31 equipment in the carrier of such weapons is a completely brilliant idea.
              1. SovAr238A 28 February 2020 13: 55 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Quote: bayard
                Quote: SovAr238A
                So let's move all the troops from the borders to the Krasnoyarsk Territory according to your logic ...
                That the adversary could not destroy them!

                Already.
                And how long .
                In the Krasnoyarsk Territory, our ICBMs are just away from the sudden and disarming.
                And the MiG-31K from near Krasnoyarsk at any time can be quickly relocated: in Primorye, to Kamchatka, in a southerly direction. And if necessary, he can deliver the first blow at once - having refueled in the air during the flight and shot at least over the Caucasus or the Caspian (in the Middle East, Western Asia, and the Eastern Mediterranean).
                This is a very flexible and long-range weapon of a strategic purpose (with nuclear warheads). Taking into account the fact that the industry issues 20 MiG-31s ​​each year from modernization, and the need for such interceptors is somehow not observed (the Su-35 will do it better), then all the remaining MiG-31s ​​that can be stored can be upgraded with daggers " Such an upgrade, by the way, will be much cheaper and easier than a full-fledged interceptor. Therefore, one can expect from the arsenal of such products from 60 to 100 pcs. And these are only carriers, and they can do up to 12-16 sorties per day (according to the standard) (every hour and a half), of course, with a change of crew ...
                No one, of course, will not be able to withstand such a regime, but even two or three sorties of such a regiment (20-24 sides) with special-purpose products can destroy the entire infrastructure of a strong medium-sized state.
                One regiment.
                And as such a carrier, the MiG-31 will be able to serve for a long time, and with great benefit to the Fatherland.
                And this - the Krasnoyarsk base, will be essentially a reserve. A kind of regiment of operational-strategic reserve and quick response.
                And the other bases are completely forward-based: Kola, Kamchatka, Ciscaucasia.
                MiG-31 equipment in the carrier of such weapons is a completely brilliant idea.


                Do you really think that flying on an Mig-31 for 8 thousand kilometers is a common task?
                But about 3-4 thousand kilometers from Kansk to the proposed starting point ...
                Is the MiG-31 a bomber for you?
                Do you understand that there is iron sharpened for long-term operation, but there is for short-term?
                What are the regulations ...
                Cheetahs do not know how to run for a long time, and camels go for weeks.
                Do you understand this example?

                And where did the topic about the Special BCH come from?
                Is this a new mod or what?
                To invent something that is not and truly believe in it.
                START-1 \ 2 \ 3 treaty - do you think they mean nothing? Well, read how to control movements, storage, training, and the location of training centers and bases.
                Very interesting document.
                Fools are very uncomfortable, because they tear off all their bonnets at once ...
    3. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 13: 36 New
      • 8
      • 2
      +6
      simpler
      Migi with Daggers to transfer from Krasnoyarsk to the threatened direction than to escalate tensions where this is not needed yet
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Romario_Argo 27 February 2020 15: 39 New
          • 7
          • 1
          +6
          meant the relocation of Migov in the threatened period of time to the threatened direction
          in what quantity, for how long, with what BC, against what goals - GENA and without us will understand (!)
        2. Andrey.AN 27 February 2020 15: 55 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Threats also do not instantly increase. AUGs are not very nimble.
    4. KVK1 27 February 2020 13: 43 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      by 2024 (yes with a shift to the right) and there may appear
      1. bayard 28 February 2020 05: 01 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        What are the shifts? The industry produces 20 MiG-31 per year from modernization. Stable And the equipment on the MiG-31K is much more modest than on the interceptor - he has nothing to do with such a radar, here the plane is only a launch platform. So everything will be fast and efficient.
    5. Imperial Technocrat 27 February 2020 13: 47 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      _____ of Mongolia
    6. YOUR 27 February 2020 14: 16 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Take a pair of compasses on the map; set aside a radius of 2500 km, this is to the maximum. Any aircraft carrier falling into this circle will be destroyed :-)
      1. Kalmar 27 February 2020 14: 40 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        Quote: YOUR
        Any aircraft carrier falling into this circle will be destroyed :-)

        So taught the “Dagger" still hit the moving targets? I did not find any intelligible information on this subject. Only in one source did they broadcast something about the defeat of naval targets at the bases (standing, i.e.), but this is a fool.
        1. SovAr238A 27 February 2020 15: 27 New
          • 6
          • 9
          -3
          Quote: Kalmar
          Quote: YOUR
          Any aircraft carrier falling into this circle will be destroyed :-)

          So taught the “Dagger" still hit the moving targets? I did not find any intelligible information on this subject. Only in one source did they broadcast something about the defeat of naval targets at the bases (standing, i.e.), but this is a fool.


          Well, how so?
          For us, for several years, all Uri-patriots voiced the Dagger as the killer of aircraft carriers?
          Everything disappeared chtoli?

          There’s one of them, in the form of Romario Agro - no longer escalating, but protecting ....
          1. Operator 27 February 2020 15: 37 New
            • 3
            • 8
            -5
            Damn, and the Iskander developers didn’t even know about the impossibility of getting into the AV when they fastened the radar / optoelectronic seeker to the rocket and equipped the megaton warhead laughing
            1. Kalmar 27 February 2020 16: 44 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: Operator
              Damn, and the Iskander developers didn’t even know about the impossibility of getting into the AV when they fastened the radar / optoelectronic seeker to the rocket and equipped the megaton warhead

              They didn’t know much at all. Let's say that the Iskander has a radar seeker. Or that the existing optical seeker, by the very principle of its operation, can be aimed at something moving. About megaton warhead, too, have not heard.
          2. Mestny 27 February 2020 16: 11 New
            • 6
            • 6
            0
            Quote: SovAr238A
            Well, how so?
            For us, for several years, all Uri-patriots voiced the Dagger as the killer of aircraft carriers?
            Everything disappeared chtoli?

            You urya traitors are so funny. Really funny.
            You invent yourself, then you go round dance yourself.
            And we are pleased that everything undermines.
            The more disgusting and louder your dances are, the more right way we go.
            1. SovAr238A 27 February 2020 19: 06 New
              • 3
              • 3
              0
              Quote: Mestny
              [
              The more disgusting and louder your dances are, the more right way we go.


              What are you doing?
              That's what you change shoes on the fly ...
              The right road has long been gone, along with Brezhnev and Gorbachev, such a slogan has ended! And you continue as an ass according to the training manual of Zampolitovskaya ...
        2. Hammer 28 February 2020 03: 11 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          Quote: Kalmar
          So taught the “Dagger" still hit the moving targets?

          Do you think that a missile with a nuclear warhead needs an accurate hit on the deck in order to disable it? wink
          1. Kalmar 28 February 2020 09: 48 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: Hammer
            Do you think that a missile with a nuclear warhead needs an accurate hit on the deck in order to disable it?

            How long does a “Dagger” need to fly, say, 1000km? A few minutes at least. During this time, the aircraft carrier will quietly crawl away for a couple of kilometers, so the power of a 50kt warhead will not be enough to defeat it.
      2. SovAr238A 27 February 2020 15: 26 New
        • 7
        • 6
        +1
        Quote: YOUR
        Take a pair of compasses on the map; set aside a radius of 2500 km, this is to the maximum. Any aircraft carrier falling into this circle will be destroyed :-)


        thin...

        Mongolian steppes - right after all teeming with aircraft carriers .. :)
        1. Paranoid50 27 February 2020 16: 50 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: SovAr238A
          Mongolian steppes - right after all teeming with aircraft carriers .. :)

          Yes. yes A small catapult is mounted on the back of a Bactrian camel to launch drones. Voila. fellow wassat
    7. askort154 27 February 2020 17: 03 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      svp67 ....It remains only to understand who these MiGs will be “threatened” with with their “Daggers” from the Krasnoyarsk Territory.

      “We will threaten the place” - to everyone! 1500 km to the Northern Sea Route, as much to the Southern neighbor. The Sea of ​​Okhotsk is 2500 km away. If you add the range of the “Dagger", then everything turns out pretty well. And the airfield is far from borders, not so vulnerable. Guesses out loud, and the truth in the General Staff of the MO. hi
    8. Stalllker 27 February 2020 17: 13 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      We still have worse military units in the Krasnoyarsk Territory !!! In the form of military depots of the Pacific Fleet ... So better not try to understand
      1. edmed 28 February 2020 01: 51 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Stalllker
        In the form of military depots of the Pacific Fleet ..

        You have outdated data, CA Pacific Fleet displayed, where, military secret wink
        1. Stalllker 28 February 2020 02: 21 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          It will be withdrawn for another hundred years, but while the marines guard it
    9. 4ekist 28 February 2020 10: 43 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Maybe in the Krasnodar Territory?
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Pavel57 27 February 2020 13: 34 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    First to the Krasnoyarsk Territory, and the airfield jump on the Kuril Islands.
    1. SovAr238A 27 February 2020 15: 29 New
      • 5
      • 5
      0
      Quote: Pavel57
      First to the Krasnoyarsk Territory, and the airfield jump on the Kuril Islands.


      How many chances does the airfield on the Kuril Islands survive a healthy and healthy salvo from the adversary?

      Rather, there will not even be a salvo, a couple of units of the naval special forces to capture and our airport will no longer be ...
      1. Stalllker 28 February 2020 02: 25 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Therefore, they are based in the Krasnoyarsk Territory
    2. Stalllker 28 February 2020 02: 29 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Yes, there are enough highways with a couple of fuel trucks
      1. SovAr238A 28 February 2020 16: 40 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Quote: Stalllker
        Yes, there are enough highways with a couple of fuel trucks


        For the MiG-31?
        right here is any piece?
        Have you ever seen airfield equipment?
        To provide aircraft maintenance ...
        Missile suspension and delivery than you will do?
        And you can write a million such questions ...
        1. Stalllker 29 February 2020 04: 44 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          I’m talking about refueling, and for this, there are enough routes and fuel trucks
  4. Ka-52 27 February 2020 13: 37 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Each time reading similar news, either about the manufacture of the Mace and Sarmat on Krasmash, or about the arming of the Kansk regiment with Daggers, the thought comes that the Americans will not regret nuclear warheads in my hometown of Krasnoyarsk crying
    1. Gost2012 27 February 2020 13: 40 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      Quote: Ka-52
      Each time reading similar news, either about the manufacture of the Mace and Sarmat on Krasmash, or about the arming of the Kansk regiment with Daggers, the thought comes that the Americans will not regret nuclear warheads in my hometown of Krasnoyarsk crying

      so move before it's too late
      1. Xnumx vis 27 February 2020 16: 42 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Gost2012
        Quote: Ka-52
        Each time reading similar news, either about the manufacture of the Mace and Sarmat on Krasmash, or about the arming of the Kansk regiment with Daggers, the thought comes that the Americans will not regret nuclear warheads in my hometown of Krasnoyarsk crying

        so move before it's too late

        To Sevastopol or Kaliningrad! laughing
    2. Wedmak 27 February 2020 13: 44 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      This also means that someone will get fewer of them. good
    3. yaros 27 February 2020 13: 48 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      C'mon, I have a 5-minute walk from the Admiralty Shipyards, where they make submarines, and a little farther the main headquarters of the Navy, we don’t have time to run further to the metro, and the time for the rockets and aircraft to arrive from Estonia is 10min .... And they ask who will be bombed first ?
      1. igorspb 27 February 2020 14: 36 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Estonia?)))
      2. Paranoid50 27 February 2020 15: 20 New
        • 7
        • 1
        +6
        Quote: yaros
        C'mon, I have a 5 min walk Admiralty Shipyards,

        A 30-minute walk - the Baltic Shipyard, a 30-minute drive - Severnaya Verf, an hour away - Almaz-Antey .... fellow
        Quote: yaros
        we’ll not have time to run further to the metro,

        Come on, to “Narva” - 15 minutes of running at an average pace (if there are legs). yes laughing
        And generally speaking:
        No need to fear nuclear war. Let half of humanity perish, but the rest will live under communism.
        Mao Tse Dong
        1. Mestny 27 February 2020 16: 18 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          Quote: Paranoid50
          No need to fear nuclear war. Let half of humanity perish, but the rest will live under communism.
          Mao Tse Dong

          All the same, the leader will have to unfasten part of the extracted hides, meat, stone axes, and other products of production.
          1. Paranoid50 27 February 2020 16: 51 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            Quote: Mestny
            All the same, the leader will have to unfasten

            However, a progressive tax. yes laughing
    4. carstorm 11 27 February 2020 13: 53 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      there are many such cities in the country) all the goals have been marked for a long time. all suicide cities in case of war. the only way out is moving to the taiga for permanent residence). it's like my native Khabarovsk. all the headquarters gathered in it from the military district to the National Guard and the Ministry of Internal Affairs) all in the city center))))
    5. Sergey Averchenkov 27 February 2020 14: 12 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Are you also a Krasnoyarsk man? I am glad. :)
    6. Lekz 27 February 2020 14: 13 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      Can you move, for example, to Washington? They don’t make rockets and daggers are based there.
    7. Zoldat_A 27 February 2020 14: 29 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Ka-52
      Each time reading similar news, either about the manufacture of the Mace and Sarmat on Krasmash, or about the arming of the Kansk regiment with Daggers, the thought comes that the Americans will not regret nuclear warheads in my hometown of Krasnoyarsk crying

      In Soviet times, as a child, I had a chance to live in Kuibyshev (Samara) for several years. Just at the time when the newspapers published the American plan for the nuclear bombing of the USSR (I don’t remember which account) with a list of cities in the order of strikes.

      There was confidence that nothing really threatened us - the hope for our own Army was born before me.

      There was children's pride - they still appreciate it - in the top ten!

      There was a childish resentment - why not the third after Moscow and Leningrad, or the 5th or the 7th .... Do not appreciate it?

      Grew up, wiser, served, worked. I get it.
      Nothing, defend Krasnoyarsk ... Like any other city.drinks
    8. Stalllker 28 February 2020 02: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And one warhead is enough, our city is compact
  5. Imperial Technocrat 27 February 2020 13: 46 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    as a carrier of a hypersonic missile, which is an aviation version of the Iskander-M OTRK missile.

    The dagger is not a complete copy of Iskander suspended on an airplane. Built on the base, but has improvements
  6. Warrior MorePhoto 27 February 2020 13: 49 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: svp67
    It remains only to understand who these MiGs will be “threatened” with with their “Daggers” from the Krasnoyarsk Territory ...


    Yes, it would be more logical to go to the Baltic or Kamchatka, but most likely the MiGs there carry out the direct task of interception, and in Krasnoyarsk it is like a jump to the south, west, east or to the NSR
  7. Lekz 27 February 2020 14: 16 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It is a reasonable decision. And there is no direct threat of defeat, and NATO is not aroused, and the southern neighbor is calm, and there is an opportunity for two hours to be in the right place.
  8. moreman78 27 February 2020 14: 19 New
    • 8
    • 4
    +4
    That is, the Kansk regiment will cease to be a fighter. Remarkably, there is such a hole in the air defense - there will not be a single destroyer between Domnaya and Perm Falcon! They used to shoot for it.
  9. SovAr238A 27 February 2020 15: 20 New
    • 3
    • 4
    -1
    Why in the very center of the country, at a distance of 3-4 thousand kilometers from the coast - are the killers of aircraft carriers ...
    ??
  10. ficus2003 27 February 2020 16: 25 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "At the end of November this year, the Ministry of Defense reported"
    This 2019 copy-paste article?
  11. Old26 27 February 2020 16: 30 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: svp67
    It remains only to understand who these MiGs will be “threatened” with with their “Daggers” from the Krasnoyarsk Territory ...

    Sergei! The exact same question. Clearly Monchegorsk and Yelizovo. It is clear if there was a Krasnodar Territory. But Kansk .... About 3000 km to Primorye ...

    Quote: Romario_Argo
    simpler
    Migi with Daggers to transfer from Krasnoyarsk to the threatened direction than to escalate tensions where this is not needed yet

    At one time, while studying at the Institute in Novocherkassk, he lived in a private apartment for some time. so the landlady in such cases said that it was something like "Go to Gorlovka through Riga" ...
    So the regiment in Yelizovo and in Monchegorsk will not escalate tensions? But a third regiment, in order not to escalate tension, should be planted in Kansk ... Wisely, very wisely. And then it will be necessary to provide another transfer in the right direction ...

    Quote: Pavel57
    First to the Krasnoyarsk Territory, and the airfield jump on the Kuril Islands.

    But Yelizovsky regiment is not suitable for this? Do you need to make a jump airfield 4000 km from the airfield based ???
    1. Operator 27 February 2020 16: 44 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      The upgraded MiG-31BSM is a universal missile carrier, and not just part of the Dagger aviation missile system.

      Missile-carrying MiGs serve as carriers of aeroballistic missiles, ultra-long-range airborne explosives, space rockets and anti-satellite missiles. In order to use the latest MiG-31BSM are located in Kansk.
      1. kit88 27 February 2020 17: 19 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        You said either too much or too little.
        That is, you want to say that there is no specialized MiG-31K, but there is a universal MiG-31BSM.
        If you believe open sources, then in Kansk there are only 4 pieces of BSM, the rest are BM, unlike, say, Bolshoi Savino, where the entire regiment is modified BSM.
  12. Dikson 27 February 2020 17: 26 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    I look here such aviation experts gathered with curvimeters .. measured by isobaths and meridians .. The official location for these machines still does not say anything .. Kansk is not quite Krasnoyarsk .. As well as Alykel is not an island in the Middle .. Krasnoyarsk Territory - this is not Kaliningrad and Voronezh .. The territory is huge, look at the map .. Cape Chelyuskina, Novaya Zemlya, islands in the Arctic Ocean are also the Krasnoyarsk Territory ... Therefore, you don’t draw your radiuses of 2,5 km with compasses from Krasnoyarsk, and from the archipelago Severnaya Zemlya at least .. and there - the north the first pole across the road is literally .. therefore there is where to "Dagger" throw ...
    1. SovAr238A 27 February 2020 19: 21 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Dikson
      I look here such aviation experts gathered with curvimeters .. measured by isobaths and meridians .. The official location for these machines still does not say anything .. Kansk is not quite Krasnoyarsk .. As well as Alykel is not an island in the Middle .. Krasnoyarsk Territory - this is not Kaliningrad and Voronezh .. The territory is huge, look at the map .. Cape Chelyuskina, Novaya Zemlya, islands in the Arctic Ocean are also the Krasnoyarsk Territory ... Therefore, you don’t draw your radiuses of 2,5 km with compasses from Krasnoyarsk, and from the archipelago Severnaya Zemlya at least .. and there - the north the first pole across the road is literally .. therefore there is where to "Dagger" throw ...


      Before you smartly carry nonsense, look at where the Mig-31 aircraft station is located - the town of Kansk, in the suburb of which is the village of Checheul. There is the airfield Dalniy (Kansk).
      And then, if you have something to understand - measure ...