Military Review

The first set of S-350 Vityaz air defense systems entered service with the Russian Aerospace Forces

49
The first set of S-350 Vityaz air defense systems entered service with the Russian Aerospace Forces

The first S-350 Vityaz anti-aircraft missile system officially entered service with the Aerospace Forces (VKS), the latest complex calculations have already begun to master the technology at the training center in Gatchina. This was reported by the press service of the Ministry of Defense.


The first newest complex of anti-aircraft missile troops S-350 "Vityaz" entered the VKS - recently the complex arrived at the training center of anti-aircraft missile forces in Gatchina

- said in a statement.

The capabilities of the new complex were demonstrated to reporters. Calculations C-350 conducted a training to detect and destroy a conventional enemy.

The combat crew of the S-350 air defense system demonstrated its skills, destroyed electronic firing of a conditional enemy and made a march to a new position area

- added to the military department.

The transfer of the first S-350 Vityaz air defense system to the anti-aircraft regiment of the Russian Aerospace Forces was reported in December 20th. The transfer took place at the Kapustin Yar training ground in the Astrakhan region. The equipment was supposed to arrive in the Leningrad Region in January this year.

The S-350 Vityaz air defense system is a medium-range complex used to organize air defense of important administrative or military targets against air strikes of various means. It is focused on the creation of multi-stage protection, ensuring the safety of the airspace of the state. SAM can hit manned Aviation (aircraft, helicopters), drones, as well as cruise and ballistic missiles. In addition, it is able to prevent impacts from low-flying objects. The complex is designed to replace the troops S-300PS and Buk-M1-2.

SAM "Vityaz" is able to work in automatic mode, in which the calculation ensures the deployment of air defense systems and control over the actions of the system. The maximum number of simultaneously hit aerodynamic targets - 16, ballistic - 12. The maximum range of destruction - 60 km, height - 30 km. The deployment time of the system in the combat position - 5 minutes.
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 26 February 2020 14: 38 New
    +6
    A complex similar to the Buk M3 in terms of parameters? It seems like the altitude is higher, the number of targets is greater ... in short, there is never too much air defense. Otherwise, jackals will bomb them ... they have a lot of planes ...
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 26 February 2020 14: 40 New
      11
      a military beech, but this is an object.
      1. loki565
        loki565 26 February 2020 23: 13 New
        +1
        a military beech, but this is an object.

        Since the difference is only in the speed of deployment and cross-country ability of the chassis, this is all solved
    2. vvvjak
      vvvjak 26 February 2020 14: 42 New
      +4
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      A complex similar to the Buk M3 in terms of parameters? It seems like the altitude is higher, the number of targets is greater ...

      As far as I am aware of its main "feature" of the missile with ARGSN. Well, their number.
    3. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 26 February 2020 14: 53 New
      +1
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      A complex similar to the Buk M3 in terms of parameters? It seems like the altitude is higher, the number of targets is greater ... in short, there is never too much air defense. Otherwise, jackals will bomb them ... they have a lot of planes ...


      Incomprehensible figures of 60 km in range and 30 km in height. Maybe you mean when working on ballistic missiles? So it should work at 150 km.
      Maritime unification
      Together with the Vityaz S-350, the designers of the Almaz-Antey Concern developed the latest Polement-Redut air defense system. Both systems are unified, which involves the production of the same type of structural elements, components, assemblies, systems, launchers and ammunition, which are equipped with various weapons systems. Military experts note that this approach allows significant savings on the organization of mass production, as well as improve the operational characteristics of air defense systems.

      "Polement-Redoubt" is designed to protect the destroyers, frigates and corvettes of the Navy from an air attack. At present, Poliment-Redut is installed on the frigate Admiral Gorshkov and the Soobrazitelny corvette.
      The complex is capable of hitting enemy aircraft, cruise and anti-ship missiles of the enemy at ranges of up to 150 km. The Poliment-Redut marine complex is equipped with 9M100, 9M96, and 9M96D missiles.

      In addition, the developers of the complex claim that in the coming years a unified air defense missile based on 40N6 ammunition for the S-400 and S-500 systems will be developed for unified air defense systems. This new projectile will allow the air defense system to intercept air targets at a distance of up to 400 km.

      https://russian.rt.com/russia/article/701206-s-350-vityaz-rossiya-oruzhie
      1. Grigory_45
        Grigory_45 26 February 2020 17: 19 New
        0
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        Inexplicable figures 60 km in range and 30 km in height

        absolutely understandable.
        For aerodynamic purpose - range from 1,5 to 60 km, ceiling up to 30 km
        For a ballistic target - a range of 1,5 to 30 km, a ceiling of 2 to 25 km
        1. Sky strike fighter
          Sky strike fighter 26 February 2020 17: 38 New
          +1
          Quote: Gregory_45
          Quote: Sky Strike fighter
          Inexplicable figures 60 km in range and 30 km in height

          absolutely understandable.
          For aerodynamic purpose - range from 1,5 to 60 km, ceiling up to 30 km
          For a ballistic target - a range of 1,5 to 30 km, a ceiling of 2 to 25 km

          Where did you get the figure of 30 km for ballistic targets?
          The maximum range of defeat is 60 km, height - 30 km.

          This is data on the work on ballistic targets, which is comparable to the Patriot PAC-3 ERINT missile defense. The data on the S-350 with missiles to work on ballistic targets.
          There are missiles for the S-350 with air defense functions for aerodynamic targets of 150 km in range and 30-35 km in height. It is comparable in performance characteristics with the Patriot PAC-3 MSE air defense.
          1. Grigory_45
            Grigory_45 26 February 2020 17: 47 New
            0
            Quote: Sky Strike fighter
            Where did you get the number

            from the officially known characteristics of the complex
          2. Romario_Argo
            Romario_Argo 26 February 2020 22: 58 New
            0
            Where did you get the figure of 30 km for ballistic targets?

            many non-docking
            this is due to the speed of 9M96E2 missiles in 2100 m / s.
            and with a deceleration of the warhead upon entering the atmosphere, at an altitude of 30 km. will be up to 2000 m / s.
            at an altitude of 60 km - up to 5000 m / s. - S-350 can work on targets with a speed of up to 4800 m / s.
    4. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 26 February 2020 14: 55 New
      16
      Good news, I’ve been waiting for several years.
      It is planned that Vityaz will replace the S-300PS and Buk-M1-2.
    5. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 26 February 2020 16: 48 New
      +1
      The missiles also have a belt with engines to increase maneuverability ... do BukM3 missiles have such?
      1. sivuch
        sivuch 26 February 2020 17: 03 New
        +4
        NYA - control at 317 only aerodynamic. And so 317A is very expensive
  2. Oleg kubanoid
    Oleg kubanoid 26 February 2020 14: 39 New
    0
    the range is different everywhere .. in the RT it was written up to 120 km. 60 km here ..
    1. Genry
      Genry 26 February 2020 16: 31 New
      +1
      Quote: Oleg kubanoid
      the range is different everywhere .. in the RT it was written up to 120 km. 60 km here ..

      Uses three types of rockets ....
      9M96 (60km), 9M96-2 (more than 100km) and 9M100 (15km)
      and for different purposes - different possible characteristics.
  3. NEXUS
    NEXUS 26 February 2020 14: 43 New
    0
    I think in the near future a couple of complexes will be transferred to Syria, if not already transferred.
    1. Bongo
      Bongo 26 February 2020 15: 26 New
      +6
      Quote: NEXUS
      I think in the near future a couple of complexes will be transferred to Syria, if not already transferred.

      Andrei, Good day!
      Tell me, why does the ATS need an air defense system that has recently been put into service, with not eliminated "childhood sores" and poorly mastered by personnel? what request For at least two or three years, the S-350 will undergo military tests and be tested in the mode of carrying the database on Russian territory.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 26 February 2020 15: 37 New
        +5
        Quote: Bongo
        Andrei, Good day!

        Hello, Sergey!
        Quote: Bongo
        Tell me why the SAR needs an air defense system, recently adopted

        Answer me a counter question then - why in Syria was the SU-57, Platform-M, Uranus-9, etc.?
        Quote: Bongo
        For at least two or three years, the S-350 will undergo military tests and be tested in the mode of carrying the database on Russian territory.

        It will be ... but apparently, almost all new weapons are passing through Syria. And it does not matter at what stage they are: in military trials, pre-production, etc. Apparently they came to the conclusion that the real adversary will show the strengths and weaknesses of the new much faster.
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 26 February 2020 16: 45 New
          +4
          Quote: NEXUS
          Answer me a counter question then - why in Syria was the SU-57, Platform-M, Uranus-9, etc.?

          So for these products in Syria it was possible to organize real shooting in the setting. as close to combat.
          And what kind of firing can the S-350 have? They in Syria, except that folding-deployment and march to work out. For the militants of the Air Force do not, and it’s not kosher to touch everyone else.
        2. sivuch
          sivuch 26 February 2020 17: 00 New
          +3
          regarding Su-57 - there was such an assumption on the abaza (if anything - AAZ is working / al in the dry bureau)
          M.I.K.> Problems with new technology in the new region are a given. Or do you think ours just drove the Su-57 to Syria?
          Can anyone really think that in 2 (two) days it is possible, at least in the first approximation, to assess "problems with new technology in a new region"? :)
          In a dark bus some scoundrel told me "© that someone came up with a bright idea to" touch "the Su-57 radar station of the Israeli F-35. Nuacho? And they flew.
          However, the Israelis did not want to substitute themselves (just in preparation for takeoff of the 57s, they quickly flopped to the ground - there were enough informants around our a / b). But our resources of the RTR "potential enemy" were substituted in full.
          As a result, the command "Quickly return everything back!" Followed, and the authors and "supporters" of the bright idea got rid of sickly people from the authorities.
          http://forums.airbase.ru/2020/02/t87764_168--f-35-patsient-skoree-zhiv.1364.html
        3. Bongo
          Bongo 27 February 2020 02: 39 New
          +3
          Quote: NEXUS
          Answer me a counter question then - why in Syria was the SU-57, Platform-M, Uranus-9, etc.?

          I don’t know about Uranus-9 and everything else request But with the Su-57 - it was a stupid PR. negative There was no need for their presence in the ATS. No.
          Quote: NEXUS
          It will be ... but apparently, almost all new weapons are passing through Syria. And it does not matter at what stage they are: in military trials, pre-production, etc. Apparently they came to the conclusion that the real adversary will show the strengths and weaknesses of the new much faster.

          Syria is not a place where indiscriminately should be shoved all the news. No.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 27 February 2020 02: 45 New
            0
            Quote: Bongo
            But with the Su-57 - it was a stupid PR.

            Serega, are you sure that he was there only twice?
            Quote: Bongo
            Syria is not a place where indiscriminately should be shoved all the news.

            Syria is, first of all, today a large training ground where everyone who is not lazy is testing their military technologies. So why should the Russian Federation be an exception? After all, you yourself know that nothing pushes military technologies and weapon upgrades so much as real DBs, and moreover, the larger they are, the better for a new weapon, no matter how cynical it sounds.
            1. Bongo
              Bongo 27 February 2020 02: 51 New
              +5
              Quote: NEXUS
              Serega, are you sure that he was there only twice?

              Andrey, what can a "raw" Su-57 from an experimental batch do, which other VKS aircraft in the SAR cannot?
              Quote: NEXUS
              Syria is, first of all, today a large training ground where everyone who is not lazy is testing their military technologies. So why should the Russian Federation be an exception? After all, you yourself know that nothing pushes military technologies and weapon upgrades so much as real DBs, and moreover, the larger they are, the better for a new weapon, no matter how cynical it sounds.

              This is true when equipment and weapons are brought to the required level of combat readiness and technical reliability. Are you aware of the epic with the Su-35S when this machine was adopted and when did you start carrying out the database? And this is in the lead 23rd IAP, which is based on the same airfield as the manufacturer.
  4. Tiksi-3
    Tiksi-3 26 February 2020 14: 43 New
    +2
    quote from the article - Maximum destruction range - 60 km, altitude - 30 km, somewhere here a typo .... 120-150 range then)) and well, no matter how not 60 .... its marine version is Polement- Redoubt to 150, and the ground one is 60)) ??
    1. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 26 February 2020 15: 11 New
      +1
      60 km destruction range and 30 km destruction height is most likely in the S-350 missile variant. And 150 km destruction range for work on aerodynamic targets. By analogy with the Patriot PAC-3 ERINT missile defense, which is sharpened for work on ballistic missiles with a range of up to 1000 km and has a range of destruction of about 60 km and a height of destruction of 20-30 km. Then, as the Patriot PAC-3 MSE air defense is ground for work on aerodynamic targets at a distance of about 120 km and an altitude of 30 km. Most likely, the S-350 set entered service in the missile defense version.
    2. Grigory_45
      Grigory_45 26 February 2020 17: 20 New
      0
      Quote: Tiksi-3
      its marine version of Polement-Redoubt is up to 150, and the land one is 60)) ??

      Reduta has a different radar and slightly different missiles
  5. kjhg
    kjhg 26 February 2020 14: 43 New
    -36
    They took it, now they will begin to prepare it for the parade, and then carry it to all kinds of exhibitions.
    1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
      Sidor Amenpodestovich 26 February 2020 15: 03 New
      -19
      The economy is flying into the abyss, the people are impoverished and to the limit, the plaster has been removed, the client has left. Leave the ship.
      1. Sky strike fighter
        Sky strike fighter 26 February 2020 15: 20 New
        +8
        Quote: Sydor Amenpospestovich
        The economy is flying into the abyss, the people are impoverished and to the limit, the plaster has been removed, the client has left. Leave the ship.

        You write about Ukraine here.
        1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
          Sidor Amenpodestovich 26 February 2020 15: 33 New
          -4
          The lion's share of the local contingent is passionately dreaming of a repetition of the Ukrainian scenario in Russia. At least in order to then, wrapped in felt boots, mutter incessantly: "I knew it, I foresaw!"
          With a feeling of deep satisfaction.
    2. bk316
      bk316 26 February 2020 15: 18 New
      +4
      They took it, now they will begin to prepare it for the parade, and then carry it to all kinds of exhibitions.

      If all the air defense systems that had entered the troops over the past 10 years were taken to the parade on Red Square, then the parade would have lasted many days. laughing
    3. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 26 February 2020 15: 32 New
      0
      Just in time for air defense systems, the situation is more or less normal. Your causticity is out of place in this case.
      1. Grigory_45
        Grigory_45 26 February 2020 17: 24 New
        -4
        Quote: Sergej1972
        Just in time for air defense systems, the situation is more or less normal

        in what place is it normal? How much did Pliment Redoubt bring? How long did the long-range missile for the S-400 finish ??? (Triumph, having entered the database many years ago, was in fact a version of the S-300). Vityaz waited by 2016 ... And the list goes on for a long time ..
        In addition, you apparently have a rainbow-like picture from what prototypes say and show. Yes, we have a lot of experienced ones, this cannot be taken away, OCD and R&D are going on. . And how many of them are in the troops ??? Indeed, only they standing on the database can actually shoot.
  6. kapitan281271
    kapitan281271 26 February 2020 14: 44 New
    +1
    GOOD WHAT IS S-350
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 26 February 2020 15: 37 New
      +6
      Quote: kapitan281271
      GOOD WHAT IS S-350

      And it’s bad for someone he doesn’t have at the right time.
      Black Abdullah
      laughing laughing laughing
  7. St Petrov
    St Petrov 26 February 2020 14: 44 New
    +7
    HURRAH! MOTHER TO GO !! 1
    I am very happy for the air defense as a representative wassat
    I read it for a long time and already thought that it would not be in the troops.
  8. Operator
    Operator 26 February 2020 15: 32 New
    -5
    It remains to install the radar on the S-350 launcher and it will be possible to write off the Buki.
    1. Grits
      Grits 26 February 2020 15: 51 New
      -1
      Quote: Operator
      It remains to install the radar on the S-350 launcher and it will be possible to write off the Buki

      What for? let Buki go to military air defense
      1. Genry
        Genry 26 February 2020 16: 40 New
        +1
        Quote: Gritsa
        let Buki go to military air defense

        Maintain your expiration date ....

        And the S-350 can also enter the troops on a caterpillar chassis.
      2. St Petrov
        St Petrov 26 February 2020 17: 41 New
        0
        let Buki go to military air defense


        they are there too. what

    2. Genry
      Genry 26 February 2020 16: 42 New
      -2
      Quote: Operator
      It remains to install a radar on the PU S-350

      Нет!
      Flies apart from cutlets ...
    3. Ros 56
      Ros 56 26 February 2020 16: 45 New
      0
      Nonsense, anti-aircraft guns do not happen much. Better let the extra be than miss one missile. stop negative request
  9. faterdom
    faterdom 26 February 2020 15: 43 New
    +3
    Congratulations to "partners" and other Poles-Ukrainians, as well as corny Romanians! This is a great joy for all of them!
  10. Ros 56
    Ros 56 26 February 2020 16: 42 New
    0
    So did Vityaz seem to want to deploy in the north?
    1. Grigory_45
      Grigory_45 26 February 2020 21: 01 New
      0
      Quote: Ros 56
      So did Vityaz seem to want to deploy in the north?

      hear it for the first time. Not to be confused with the "Pantsir" and "Thor" in the Arctic version on the chassis of the two-link transporter DT-30 "Vityaz"?



      The article talks about the object air defense system - the medium-range air defense missile system S-350 "Vityaz"
  11. Imperial Technocrat
    Imperial Technocrat 26 February 2020 17: 14 New
    -1
    Maximum range of defeat - 60 km

    Actually, 120km. There are still medium-range missiles
    1. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 26 February 2020 17: 29 New
      -1
      60 km for ballistic targets, 150 km for aerodynamic targets for missiles, respectively with missile defense functions in the first case and with air defense functions in the second. This is the same as with the Americans Patriot PAC-3 ERINT and Patriot PAC-3 MSE missile defense. There is only one system, and there are missiles for missile defense (up to 1000 km in ballistic missile defense), and there are for air defense.
      1. Grigory_45
        Grigory_45 26 February 2020 21: 04 New
        0
        Quote: Sky Strike fighter
        60 km for ballistic targets

        Doesn’t it bother you that 60 km in ballistics has the S-400, a much more sophisticated complex and with more powerful missiles?
        And do not compare the S-350 with the Patriot with its missile defense. Completely different systems.
        The main purpose of Vityaz is to combat massive attacks of low-flying aircraft at ranges greater than those of the Shell, for targets for which expensive S-400 missiles (which are also in limited numbers) are unprofitable
  12. NF68
    NF68 26 February 2020 17: 32 New
    0
    Good news.
  13. Sarkazm
    Sarkazm 27 February 2020 00: 58 New
    +1
    Indeed - "Better late than never!" ...

    The T-90, and probably the domestic tank building in general, was saved by the Indians with their order, thanks to the Koreans for the Vityaz air defense system.
    From an interview with I. Ashurbeyli:
    "- What is the state of the program of the new Vityaz anti-aircraft missile system?

    - The story is very simple. We could not reach out in due time - under the previous leadership of the country until 2000 - that a new modern medium-range complex was needed in Russia, since more than 50 S-300PS complexes simply ceased to exist by 2015 due to the achievement of deadlines and must be disposed of. Need a replacement. Not reached. After that, we won an international tender with the Americans and the French in South Korea. And they concluded with considerable difficulties an export contract to develop for her such a medium-range complex - KM-SAM. We learned to work with imported elemental base - there were no restrictions. We have already successfully delivered two locators there and now we are supplying the third one. In Korea, firing with their missiles at their targets is already underway.

    Before the departure, the leadership of the Ministry of Defense (Russia. - "Kommersant") was invited and showed a working South Korean model in the shop, after which the experimental design work was also open for the Russian army - with a different look and other improved tactical and technical characteristics. This work has been going on since 2007 in record time. We have been assigned the task of making new equipment from scratch in five years. Such tasks were solved in five years only during the time of Lavrenty Beria, when Almaz (then KB-1 - Kommersant) made the first S-25 air defense systems for Moscow in five years. Now we are working on the stage of creating design documentation. Next year - a prototype, and in 2013 we must complete state tests.
    ".
    Source: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/1361838?isSearch=True