The war in Syria: a list of people wishing to divide the country into warring parts


The events in Syrian Idlib, when the government of Turkey and Syria came together in direct confrontation, threatened the integrity of this Arab republic. Bashar al-Assad showed a bleak prospect of gaining territories beyond the Euphrates, Kurdish regions and Idlib that are not controlled by Damascus. In this regard, a legitimate question arises: who needs a divided Syria?


The answer must be sought in the goals and interests of states plunged into the Syrian conflict. In whose interests is the division of the ATS into warring units. There are several such main interests here: the United States of America, Turkey, Israel and not only. Each of them has his own individual party in this big geopolitical game. There are other participants in this situation - Iran and Russia. Their role and goals are also worth talking about.

United States


The civil war in Syria can be seen as the result of a tear in the nomenclature clans of Damascus. However, it is painfully connected with the "Arab spring" that swept in 2011 in the countries of North Africa and the Middle East, inhabited by Arabs.

The "spontaneous" protests that brought down the governments of half a dozen countries in the region brought Arabs an American-style democracy, while using the latest American technology, using the Internet, television, mobile communications, and other modern communications.

The moderators of the "Arab Spring" were US civilian political structures associated with their highest authority. At one time, it seemed that the process got out of American control and the Islamists saddled it. But it soon became clear that these forces were controlled by the same Americans who were actively supplying Islamists with money and weapons.

In Syria, the interests of the parties did not coincide. The Islamists tried to make their radical theocratic state here. America was completely useless. She was more comfortable with controlled chaos. In addition, the brutality and barbarism of Islamic terrorists outraged the civilized world. I had to pull them.

Meanwhile, America has long defined its goals in the region. In the world, this policy has been called "divide and conquer." The Americans formulated the section by gently revealing to the world all kinds of maps and schemes for a possible state reorganization of the Middle East.

There was something to rule over. The region’s oil and gas (and recently found new large deposits) are important components of the global economy. Syria in this sense is both a mining country and a logistics region for energy. The Americans destroyed all this and now, right before the eyes of the whole world, they are brazenly pumping oil in the Syrian Zaevfratie. They definitely do not need a complete and united Syria.

Iran


Tehran in Syria has very different reasons. In recent years, Iranian ayatollahs have been able to find a balance between their religious preferences and political ambitions. So Iraq fell into their sphere of interests with the prevailing, as in Iran, Shiite population, half Shiite Lebanon and the secular state of Syria, ruled by representatives of another Islamic movement - the Alawites.

Iran clung to its teeth with Syria. He supported government forces weapons, in money, sent his military formations. Tehran has put a lot at stake in Syria, and all in order to gain control and influence in a large region - from Afghanistan to the eastern Mediterranean. In these plans, the ayatollah does not fit into the divided Syria. Then an extremely important link may fall out of their sphere of interests.

Turkey


Ankara is also interested in united Syria. This removes a number of threats for her. First of all, Kurdish. After all, the Kurds did not abandon plans to create their own state, screening out eastern Turkey right up to the Black Sea coast. Separated from Syria, the Kurdish enclave could accelerate the implementation of these plans.

Of great importance for Turkey are the communications connecting it through Syrian territory with the oil fields of the Middle East. For example, we can recall the oil pipeline from Iraqi Kirkuk to the Turkish port of Ceyhan. It is important not only for the Turkish economy, but also makes it a regional energy cluster.

The irrational policies of Turkish President Recep Erdogan are blotchy on this pragmatic picture. Experts believe that Erdogan was captured by neo-Ottoman dreams. He wants to expand not only Turkey’s influence in the region, but also its borders.

The reason for this was chosen rather dubious - the protection of Turkoman in Idlib. It is doubtful because Turkey is by no means a mono-ethnic country of the Turks. And in Idlib, no one really threatens the Turkmens, except for the same Islamists armed with Ankara against Damascus.

Today, control of Idlib has become the main goal of Turkey’s policy towards Syria. Already reached the armed clashes of the military of the two countries. This choice was made by President Erdogan. Does Turkey Need Dismembered Syria? Is not a fact. It is enough for Ankara to realize the irrationality of its current policy so that its pendulum goes in the opposite direction.

Israel


Syria for Israel is largely a "birth injury." At the time of the formation of the Jewish state, the Syrian Arabs behaved extremely unfriendly. It must be remembered that Damascus is the oldest capital of the world. Here religions originated, nations, peoples, cultures mixed up. And all this has passed through the centuries.

Now that the Syrian cities have suffered from the war, many have paid attention to the fact that residential buildings with a thousand-year-old are destroyed history. They have been transmitted from generation to generation for centuries. This way of life was the meaning and core of the Syrian people.

The first was shaken by the separation of the state of Israel from this multi-ethnic and multi-confessional world. The Syrians answered with bloody pogroms in almost all of their ancient cities. Then there were wars, the legacy of which was the painful loss of the Golan Heights for Syria.

Now, under the pretext of fighting the Iranian military, the Israelis are constantly bombing Syria, bringing new destruction to its land. Israel needs a weak Syria, and even better - fragmented, with an endless internal war.

Russia


Russia is the only country that operates under the current Syrian law. Russian troops in the SAR - at the invitation of the legitimate authorities. Russia provides assistance in the fight against terrorism and is trying to resolve the civil conflict. Russia is actually opposed to everyone who wants to use chaos in Syria in their geopolitical interests.

Russia also has its own interests in this country. First of all, this is an expansion of the military presence in the eastern Mediterranean. It allows you to stop possible strategic threats at distant approaches to its borders.

And, of course, the military presence in Syria allows you to control this region rich in hydrocarbons. Russian oil and gas companies are actively working in it. They develop and expand their activities here. New deposits recently discovered in the region make it even more attractive for Russian companies.

The interests of Russia are organically combined with the interests of Syria itself. We need peace, public order, peace and well-being of people in it. This can be achieved only by a single, integral and well-governed country.

Hot days are in Idlib. The government army cleans the province from militants and the foreign military forces supporting them. Let's hope that this land will soon come under the power and control of Damascus.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. bessmertniy 15 February 2020 10: 16 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    In this layout, it was also necessary to bring Saudi Arabia. She also has her own interests in Syria, and she also intervenes in the affairs of the SAR with her Arab allies. The goal is simple - to tear Syria from the zone of influence of Iran, and Russia once again annoy. negative
    1. Divizion 15 February 2020 10: 20 New
      • 3
      • 7
      -4
      Syria for Israel is largely a "birth injury."

      This is the essence of this massacre in BV .. Theme can be closed!
      1. dSK
        dSK 15 February 2020 12: 10 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        From the history:
        Soon after the defeat in the First World War, the Ottoman Empire collapsed, and many of its territories were occupied. In 1920 year the Syrian Arab Kingdom was founded with a center in Damascus. But Syrian independence did not last long. Within a few months, the French army occupied Syria, defeating the Syrian forces on July 23 at the battle of Meisalun Pass.
        In accordance with the Franco-Turkish Treaty 20 1921 October, the The Alexandrette Sanjak was singled out as a special autonomous administrative unit within the French mandate.
        In 1922, the League of Nations decided to legalize the occupation of the lands of the Ottoman Empire by Britain and France. France in 1922 received the Mandate of the League of Nations on the territory of Syria. In 1926, the mandated territory was divided into Lebanon and Syria.
        On September 7, 1938, the State of Hatay was formed on the territory of the Alexandretta Sanjak in the north-west of Syria, which was annexed by Turkey on June 29, 1939.

        France in 1938 "sold" part of Syria to the Turks.
        Capture of Idlib by pro-Turkish militants - further annexation, a wedge driven by the Turks into Syria, with the aim of cutting off Syria from the sea coast.
        Will Assad have the strength to prevent this?
      2. cniza 15 February 2020 12: 17 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        If you do not find a solution to this problem, the topic cannot be closed.
        1. Arlen 15 February 2020 18: 52 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: cniza
          If you do not find a solution to this problem, the topic cannot be closed.

          The solution is very difficult to find. I see two ways (I'm not a politician, it's just my vision of the solution to the problem from the philistine side). The first solution is through peaceful negotiations. Finding common ground will be very difficult. What does Turkey need? Secure from the Kurds? If so, then it will be possible to consider the issue of joint control of the territory inhabited by Kurds, not just joint patrols, namely control. I don’t know how the joint control will be implemented, but I think the military will be able to agree and know how to do it right.
          The second solution is the “muscle game” on the part of Russia. As an example, arrange a flight of strategic bombers in the conflict zone and possibly along the borders with Turkey.
          It is possible that if you combine all two paths into one, this will be an opportunity to solve the problem.
          So I see a solution to the situation.
          Quote: bessmertniy
          Saudi Arabia. She also has her own interests in Syria, and she also intervenes in the affairs of the SAR with her Arab allies.

          The positions of the Saudis in Syria are not so strong as to influence the situation in Syria. Saudi Arabia is now the main thing, in my opinion, to resolve the issue with the Hussites. On the "two fronts" they do not have such an opportunity.
          hi
    2. tihonmarine 15 February 2020 12: 21 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: bessmertniy
      In this layout, it was also necessary to bring Saudi Arabia. She also has her own interests in Syria, and she also intervenes in the affairs of the SAR with her Arab allies.

      Create a world-wide Arab caliphate, of course, under the leadership of Saudi Arabi.
  2. Basarev 15 February 2020 10: 22 New
    • 6
    • 7
    -1
    Is Syria really needed in pre-war borders? All the same, after all, a flawed state, inferior, if you recall how it arose - in violation of their promises of a single Arab state, the British and French cut the Near and Maghreb into many pieces, drawing borders at their own discretion.
    1. sabakina 15 February 2020 10: 35 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      There was Persia, there were caravan routes, carpets, spices, incense .... Then a person learned to move quickly in space. I would say too fast ....
    2. Simple 15 February 2020 10: 38 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: Basarev
      Is Syria really needed in pre-war borders?



      So many states can be said, including the United States and Israel.
    3. tihonmarine 15 February 2020 12: 25 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Basarev
      how it came about - in violation of their promises of a single Arab state, the British and French cut the Near and Maghreb into many pieces, drawing borders at their own discretion.

      So they are shaves and shades, they created Syria and other states after the WWII for themselves beloved, and not so that these states were independent and played their games. And it should be noted correctly created.
  3. Boris55 15 February 2020 10: 31 New
    • 10
    • 2
    +8
    Quote: G. Granovsky
    The interests of Russia are organically combined with the interests of Syria itself. We need peace, public order, peace and well-being of people in it.

    This is so, but some "comrades" continue with their actions, not directly, but indirectly to sponsor terrorists, including those who kill our servicemen, as our ambassador in Turkey spoke about ... We must show our citizenship without waiting for instructions from the Kremlin.

    1. Kronos 15 February 2020 12: 40 New
      • 6
      • 5
      +1
      And whoever buys an iPhone sponsors the United States?
      1. Boris55 15 February 2020 14: 01 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        Quote: Kronos
        And whoever buys an iPhone sponsors the United States?

        Why immediately the United States? Maybe China? laughing

        When buying products of a foreign state, we support the manufacturer of this state, whose taxes are incl. and arming this state.

        Refusing the services and products of a state hostile to us, we thereby express our civic position.

        Turkey, through militants controlled by them, is killing our troops. Should we relax at their resorts, along with the militants, or buy their tomatoes? I think no, they shouldn't.
        1. Vladimir B. 15 February 2020 17: 03 New
          • 12
          • 1
          +11
          Quote: Boris55
          When buying products of a foreign state, we support the manufacturer of this state, whose taxes are incl. and arming this state.

          Do we have our own products?
          Quote: Boris55
          Refusing the services and products of a state hostile to us, we thereby express our civic position.

          First, you need to establish the release of your products. and we should not refuse to buy imported products, but the state should prohibit the sale of imported products in our country, but only after the start of production of our products.
          Quote: Boris55
          Should we relax at their resorts, along with the militants, or buy their tomatoes?

          we should not. and the state is silent? Where are the travel bans on Turkey? where is the embargo on turkish tomatoes?
          1. RVAPatriot 15 February 2020 21: 48 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Vladimir, read your thoughts, which day I’m waiting for a recommendation from the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs to stop staying in Turkey ... they don’t have them, either they know that everything will be fine, or the usual sloppiness !!!
  4. Simple 15 February 2020 10: 36 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Hmm., Israel, I think, doesn’t need side by side the remnants of the state, constantly fighting among themselves.

    The author of the article raised the question of the interests of the so-called armed opposition in maintaining the integrity of Syria: as we all observe, this opposition does not need the integrity of Syria. The so-called armed opposition is working out the interests of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the United States and Israel. e., in essence, the armed opposition is nothing but foreign agents undermining the integrity of the state as such.
    1. tihonmarine 15 February 2020 12: 40 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: Simple
      Hmm., Israel, I think, doesn’t need side by side the remnants of the state, constantly fighting among themselves.

      It is necessary and still as it is necessary. All these "remnants of the state, and others weakened by the war, are not afraid of Israel. Israel is a self-sufficient state militarily, with a well-armed and trained army, which is in constant readiness. Israel has shown how it can stand up for itself. It can only be denied. Syria will never reconcile with the coexistence of Israel, everything there is connected with ancient history, that is, conflicts and Syria-Israel wars will be inevitable, and Israel is doing everything to make these wars less frequent and if they happen, what would be worth painless for Israel, which we now see. The emergence of a single strong Syria is very undesirable for Israel. Take at least the "Day of Doomsday" where Israel won, but with what losses and what costs. And now for them, "quiet, smooth, divine grace. "Well, they pulled a couple of missiles, bombed a link of bombers, bombed, made noise on the media and that’s all. Losses are practically zero.
      1. RVAPatriot 15 February 2020 21: 54 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Forgot to add that Israel itself creates tension .... That will not become its master "USA" or the sponsorship vector will change, where will it go? Israel simply peck, a country whose rights are based on the Bible, which was rewritten many times ... for me (not an anti-Semist), a rotten nation, not for nothing they do not like them everywhere, not from God ... they bow too much for an idol .. .
  5. knn54 15 February 2020 10: 43 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    CASE not only in Syria:
    Bernard Lewis, the most famous American orientalist MORE in 1979 (the entry of Soviet troops into Afghanistan, the revolution in Iran), first presented to the Bilderberg Club his plan for political reformatting of the Middle East.
    ",,, split off territories inhabited by Druze and Alawites from Syria, making them independent mini-states; establish a dwarf Maronite state in the territories of the relevant regions of Lebanon; create an independent Kurdistan in the regions of Turkey, Iraq, Syria and Iran inhabited by Kurds; separate the areas of Iraq inhabited by Shiites to create an independent state there; create an independent Arab state in Iran, in the province of Khuzestan, in whose territory most of the Iranian oil fields are located; to live in Pakistan, having separated independent Balochistan and uniting the Pashtun areas lying on both sides of the Afghan-Pakistani border into a single state "...
    The main thing is that Russia would not give its victory in Syria to the Yankees and Co., otherwise Syria's turn for Iraq, etc.
  6. Vladimir61 15 February 2020 10: 45 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Iran is still pursuing its immediate goals, and in the long term, a secular state in Syria does not suit it.
  7. 2 Level Advisor 15 February 2020 10: 50 New
    • 8
    • 1
    +7
    It is constantly heard that everyone needs Syrian oil .. Let's estimate, is there any profit in this oil?
    Syria is in 39th place in terms of oil reserves, on a par with Argentina. For example, oil reserves at 84! times less than in Iraq. Now oil is worth 57.22 dollars per barrel (Brent 15.02.20/02/00 400000:5 Moscow time). The best pre-war! times produced 420 barrels. Ideally (which does not smell yet), if the war suddenly disappeared with the militants, you can get from the sale minus the costs of production and transport, about XNUMX billion dollars a year. With production in Iraq XNUMX billion per year.

    Total Of course, there is oil in Syria. But the minke whales shook the country, obviously not because of it, too little to justify such an operation, even in Egypt 2 times more .. Therefore, oil is definitely not the reason for the American intervention. But what exactly I agree with in the article — striped controlled chaos, I think the most .. If it weren’t for Russia, I’d already think they would tear Syria into 2-3 parts .. between Israel, Turkey and the rebels.
    1. Snail N9 15 February 2020 11: 26 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      It's not about oil. It’s just that the Saudis are probably looking for a place to create Muslim states for the revival of the Wahhabi caliphate under their leadership.
      1. 2 Level Advisor 15 February 2020 21: 22 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Are the Saudis? Although, if we assume that they are acting under the leadership of the United States, it’s quite .. these ambitions, the minke whales are flaming east .. and the bonfire is burning under their "sensitive guidance"
    2. Whalebone 15 February 2020 12: 21 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Syria was drawn on the line before the departure of the Angles and French from the Middle East. Without taking into account national characteristics, religions, way of life. Syria within its current borders is no longer needed even by Assad, for he has no peaceful means of government. The only way to stop the war there is to breed the main participants in order to eliminate a physical collision. Remove Iranian and Turkish proxies from there. Kurds need their own state, the question has ripened long ago. Help the Kurds of the Russian Federation, they would be grateful for 100 years in advance. There is no need for a better ally in BV Russia. Arabs have always thrown Russians, you can see by dates. They are not allies to us, were not and will not be. Kurds and partially Jews - that’s who you can and should rely on in that region. If it is generally decided that BV is included in the sphere of Russian strategic tasks, which has not yet been formulated clearly for the last 5 years. And yes, if the war goes on for so long, then there is no interest in ending it.
      1. 2 Level Advisor 15 February 2020 21: 24 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        You don’t really argue .. although .. if we give buns and we and the states something they choose them .. but Israel, as a temporary ally, is closer to us here, although by the fact that they don’t need a LIP on the border either ..
    3. protoss 15 February 2020 20: 10 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      in vain try, think something, multiply. it is too difficult for local readers, they were told from TV that the matter is in oil, then in oil. according to our generally accepted opinion, everything in the world revolves around oil, and everything else is secondary. otherwise how else to explain our economy?
      1. 2 Level Advisor 15 February 2020 21: 17 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Alexander, for so many, unfortunately - yes, it’s difficult, you are very right .. but there are a lot of people who use the site not only for food, I’m trying for them .. I’m trying to keep a dialogue with them hi
        1. Kasym 16 February 2020 21: 20 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          In my opinion, Nikolai, the Arabian monarchs are the cause of the events in Syria. They supported the NATO against Saddam Hussein in Iraq, and in return received Shiite rule in this country with great Iranian influence - they did not like it very much. Overseas friends had to “seek compensation”. Assad, secular Syria has become a suitable "candidate." This was beneficial to the US allies in the region. hi
  8. evp
    evp 15 February 2020 10: 52 New
    • 2
    • 5
    -3
    Gazprom and Rosneft decide everything
  9. evp
    evp 15 February 2020 10: 55 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Think couch generals
  10. jonht 15 February 2020 11: 01 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Erdogan himself complicated everything. If he really divorced in the Idlib gadyushnik on the right of one, on the left of the other, then the process of reconciliation would have gone quickly. At this time, the CAA would deal with the Kurds and that part of the country where the FSA. But he messed up, not a true cryptography and not an accurate calculation, and he has this for many problems.
  11. 75 Sergey 15 February 2020 11: 05 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Straight
    Own point of view ...
  12. RVAPatriot 15 February 2020 11: 16 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    "Ankara is also interested in united Syria" - and reality shows the opposite ...
  13. parusnik 15 February 2020 11: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is enough for Ankara to realize the irrationality of its current policy so that its pendulum goes in the opposite direction.
    ... But if they don’t realize? ..
    New deposits recently discovered in the region make it even more attractive for Russian companies.
    ... Are these the ones that Americans or others pump oil from?
  14. cniza 15 February 2020 12: 13 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Let's hope that this land will soon come under the power and control of Damascus.


    It should not be otherwise ...
  15. Vitaly gusin 15 February 2020 12: 49 New
    • 5
    • 7
    -2
    The civil war in Syria can be seen as the result of a tear in the nomenclature clans of Damascus. However, it is painfully connected with the "Arab spring" that swept in 2011 in the countries of North Africa and the Middle East, inhabited by Arabs.
    Yes, but not everything is not as simple as trying to convince us, there were many reasons for this.
    1 Political repression in Syria.
    2 The rotten ideology of socialism.
    3 Failed economy.
    4 Severe drought 2006-2011.
    5 Rapid population growth 2005-2010.
    6 Strong development of social networks amid discontent among the population.
    7 State violence, repression.
    8 Religious minority rule in the state by majority.
    ALL THIS AND LEADS TO "ARAB SPRING"
    The Islamists tried to make their radical theocratic state here.
    Yes, but all THIS was already after how.
    I will not dwell on the interests of other countries, it is exactly the same there, not everything is clear, but for a known reason I will focus on ISRAEL
    Now, under the pretext of fighting the Iranian military, the Israelis are constantly bombing Syria, bringing new destruction to its land. Israel needs a weak Syria, and even better - fragmented, with an endless internal war.
    The most interesting is Under the pretext
    In Lebanon, it is Hezbollah and has about 100,000 missiles, of which 10,000 are modern with a guidance system. Who delivered and continues to supply? Who is it all against?
    Now Iran is trying to organize in Syria the same as in Lebanon and during Х strike at once from two places.
    The fact that the Iranian leadership threatens to destroy Israel is known to all who want to know.
    So much for the excuse.
    1. Krasnodar 15 February 2020 19: 22 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      As for Hezbollah, everything is correct. As for Assad, he destroyed Syrian socialism, carried out privatization (the sweetest was privatized by relatives from the Mahluf family - mother's brothers). The problem arose because of the drought, the Turkish "water policy" - it became difficult for peasants in privatized areas to make ends meet without state assistance. Muslim charitable communities helped them with money, while secular Syrians who were close to Assad were rich. As a result - the migration of the Islamized peasantry to the cities, the Arab war, the sympathy of a significant part of the population for pseudo-Islamists and - the Civil War. Between the dissatisfied results of privatization and the existing system, pseudo-Islamists and Assad supporters.
      1. Vitaly gusin 15 February 2020 21: 12 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: Krasnodar
        As for Assad - he destroyed Syrian socialism, carried out privatization

        Yes, of course, I indicated this in points.
        I cannot disclose every point here, it will be a report, but here it is mainly writers, not readers.
        1. Krasnodar 15 February 2020 21: 15 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          There are readers too - many Russians are not at all aware of where the legs grow from there, and the author tactfully circumvented the role of Syria in the Arab-Israeli wars, although the reasons were correctly indicated
          1. Vitaly gusin 15 February 2020 22: 06 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            Quote: Krasnodar
            although the reasons indicated correctly

            This is the salt of modern Russian propaganda. Take the facts and tk. the whole world is open and furnished according to requirements. If you noticed Russian TV there are no journalists, but there are propagandists.
            Although until 2013 there were quite a high level of them.
            1. Krasnodar 15 February 2020 22: 08 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Not quite
              There are many
              And on federal channels
              The same Posner - against the mainstream, and tough
              There are others
              1. Vitaly gusin 15 February 2020 22: 20 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Quote: Krasnodar
                The same Posner - against the mainstream, and tough

                At midnight, when no one looks exhausted by narzan and work smile
                Quote: Krasnodar
                There are others

                Who are these others?
                To be honest, I do not watch Russian news and talk shows, the nervous system objects.
                Only entertaining professional companion. These are still on TV.,
                1. Krasnodar 15 February 2020 23: 13 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Doc Tok on the first channel at 22:30 leads Ksenia Sobchak
                  Poddubny's reports from Syria are quite objective
                  And local criticizing journalists are a dime a dozen. After 2015, the news channel Russia 24 changed dramatically - if earlier they could not talk for months about the depreciation of the dollar and stupidly praise the left-wing reforms, now I watch with interest many of its programs. RBC tempered the anti-government ardor, but became very boring. Rain - this dregs you yourself see in Israel - here TV is not included in the packages of providers.
                  1. Vitaly gusin 15 February 2020 23: 40 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: Krasnodar
                    Doc Tok on the first channel at 22:30 leads Ksenia Sobchak

                    Thanks, I'll take a look
                    Quote: Krasnodar
                    Poddubny's reports from Syria are quite objective

                    Perhaps, but about this we have enough of our own.
                    Quote: Krasnodar
                    the news channel Russia 24 has radically changed -

                    I'll see
                    Quote: Krasnodar
                    RBC tempered the anti-government ardor, but became very boring. Rain - this dregs you yourself see in Israel

                    I support.,
  16. Ros 56 15 February 2020 13: 33 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Our task is to reduce the list of people who want to share Syria, the more experience there is, Russia has already tried to share in the 90s.
  17. protoss 15 February 2020 20: 49 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Russia is the only country that operates under the current Syrian law.

    in my opinion it’s ridiculous to talk about the current legislation in the context of the civil war and the collapse of the country.
    and the "current" rules of the road in Syria how to regulate the movement of tanks on public roads?
  18. protoss 15 February 2020 20: 52 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    the author writes nonsense, with little understanding of what is happening in the region. knowledge at the level of the layman who watched the news on the first channel.
    1. Krasnodar 15 February 2020 21: 17 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And what really happens there - enlighten hi
      1. protoss 15 February 2020 21: 28 New
        • 1
        • 4
        -3
        there it is necessary to write an article in several parts, unfortunately there is no time for such a thing, and indeed no desire.
        1. Krasnodar 15 February 2020 21: 57 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          In my opinion - everything is simple. Constructed by the Anglo-French colonialists from shreds of nationalities and faiths of the state under the influence of various internal and external factors, they seam at the seams, which are more powerful in the interests of the country - both neighbors and superpowers.
          1. protoss 15 February 2020 22: 08 New
            • 1
            • 4
            -3
            the fact that Syria and Iraq are temporary formations is understandable.
            but it’s not so simple, rather difficult. countries that are far from the region are being “simply” used by local players as a heavy club. while the "club" is here and in the colloquial meaning that characterizes mental abilities. unfortunately we have become such a club.
            1. Krasnodar 15 February 2020 23: 15 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              We became, pursuing our interests
      2. Vitaly gusin 15 February 2020 22: 24 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Krasnodar
        And what really happens there - enlighten

        lol