The head of USC called the date of transfer to the fleet of the APKSN project 955A "Prince Vladimir"

50
The head of USC called the date of transfer to the fleet of the APKSN project 955A "Prince Vladimir"

The nuclear submarine strategic missile cruiser Project 955A (code "Borey-A") "Prince Vladimir", which completed state tests, will be handed over to the Russian Navy in about a month and a half. This was announced on Monday by the head of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) Alexei Rakhmanov.

All finish is done, tests are finished. I think that another month and a half is needed

- TASS passes his words.



Previously reported that the submarine will be handed over the fleet at the end of December 2019, "under the tree", but later decided to shift the transfer dates to the first half of 2020. The reason for the postponement was the shortcomings identified during the latest tests of the submarine cruiser, which took place in December this year. Corrective action is being taken at Sevmash, where the submarine is now located.

Strategic nuclear project "Prince Vladimir" of the modified 955A Borey-A project was laid down at Sevmash in Severodvinsk on 30 on July 2012 of the year, and the conclusion from the workshop took place on November 17 of 2017 of the year. The Borey-A project is distinguished by less noise, more advanced systems of maneuvering and retention at depth, as well as control weapons.

At present, four more serial ARPXNs of this 955 project are being built at Sevmash: Prince Oleg (officially laid on July 27 2014), Generalissimus Suvorov (laid on December 26 2014 of the year), Emperor Alexander III (laid on December 18 2015) year) and "Prince Pozharsky" (founded December 23 2016 of the year).

Currently, the Navy is serving three nuclear missile submarines of the 955 (Borey) project of the 4 generation — the strategic missile cruisers Yuri Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky and Vladimir Monomakh.
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -35
    11 February 2020 10: 23
    Such products are tested in a combat environment. And not around the floating base.

    First on New Year, now on May 9th?
    1. +26
      11 February 2020 10: 30
      Such products are tested in combat.

      What did I miss a nuclear war?
      1. -21
        11 February 2020 10: 36
        Well, why just talk about "nuclear war"?
        There is a very wide range of functions and equipment, the effectiveness of which is advisable to test in conditions close to combat. This, for example, includes a stealth system, one of the main systems on a submarine.
    2. +12
      11 February 2020 10: 30
      Quote: Maestro Alexander
      First on New Year, now on May 9th?

      Well, this is not a pressure cooker pan, this is a huge product that needs to be brought to mind.
      1. -23
        11 February 2020 10: 42
        That's it. Therefore, some people need to forget the Soviet Depot’s habit of timed, and not run around the reception rooms with reports later.
        1. -1
          11 February 2020 21: 59
          strange - early and dodged, and the fleet numbered hundreds of units. And now they do not adhere to the "Sovdepov" traditions. And then one unit will be handed over to the fleet. And a week ago. to the plant for a couple of years, to eliminate the shortcomings.
    3. +9
      11 February 2020 10: 31
      Quote: Maestro Alexander
      Such products are tested in a combat environment. And not around the floating base.

      Yeah, from the factory right into the Gulf of Mexico.)))
      1. -17
        11 February 2020 10: 39
        Yes, here and closer there are places where to roam ... There, around the "corner".
        1. +9
          11 February 2020 11: 07
          Such ships do not go around the corner, let it be known to you.
        2. +6
          11 February 2020 11: 08
          Quote: Maestro Alexander
          Yes, here and closer there are places where to roam ... There, around the "corner".

          The entire test program lies on the couch in front of you and you know exactly where and how it was tested?
        3. +16
          11 February 2020 12: 33
          Do not remember the nonsense, it hurts. First, tests are underway, in conditions far from combat, then training of the crew, and only then you can watch what happens on the BS. And to climb on an untested boat with an unprepared crew in conditions close to combat is utter nonsense
          1. +3
            11 February 2020 12: 37
            bullshit

            I think this is called not nonsense, but a crime ....
      2. -4
        11 February 2020 10: 40
        In the water position is desirable. Immediately show yourself in all its glory. Well, fireworks run more often)
    4. +13
      11 February 2020 10: 32
      Such products are tested in a combat environment. And not around the floating base.


      Please remind me in which country and when the nuclear submarine with strategic nuclear weapons on board was tested in a combat situation?)))

      And where are you in such a hurry? Three boats of this project are in service (almost 300 nuclear warheads), this one is transferred in a month and a half, 4 more are under construction. A couple more and a complete set of 10 modern nuclear submarines carrying more than 900 nuclear units.

      And then you can lay destroyers with cruisers.

      Everything goes as it should, without tears and window dressing.
      1. -2
        11 February 2020 10: 57
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        And then you can lay destroyers with cruisers.

        can for a start provide a secretive exit (PLO) from the places of basing, but cover (PLO) the places of combat patrol ??? - then the Gorshkov Series - (M) continue (start and finish)? and then build EM ..... although they are unlikely to reach them in the next 40 years
      2. 0
        11 February 2020 11: 29
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        And where are you in such a hurry?

        "In a hurry, you will make people laugh." And here is no laughing matter, here is a missile cruiser (as I said, not a "pressure cooker").
      3. +2
        11 February 2020 12: 54
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        Everything goes as it should, without tears and window dressing.

        Although we have a less optimistic situation with submarines.
        And the systems that are on these ships I tested on old boats back in the 90s. So it's not so bad.
      4. 0
        11 February 2020 13: 30
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        Everything goes as it should, without tears and window dressing.

        is that all?
      5. -3
        11 February 2020 22: 02
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        Everything goes as it should, without tears and window dressing.

        so billions and should be stolen-quietly. calmly. without unnecessary window dressing.
    5. +7
      11 February 2020 10: 39
      Quote: Maestro Alexander
      Such products are tested in a combat environment. And not around the floating base.


      Always tested in the White Sea.
    6. 0
      11 February 2020 14: 23
      Quote: Maestro Alexander
      Such products are tested in a combat environment. And not around the floating base.

      Well, no one has ordered a nuclear armageddean yet.
      As for the tests ... so the transfer to the fleet is still a long way off, for there are still sea trials, tests on exercises, and so on ...
      1. +3
        11 February 2020 18: 38
        Quote: NEXUS
        As for the tests ... so the transfer to the fleet is still a long way off, for there are still sea trials, tests on exercises, and so on ...

        Andrew, hi
        1. "Prince" will be handed over to the fleet in 1,5 months. The General said so.
        2. The unit went through all stages of the tests, including mooring lines, military water chemistry, firing of the main complex, deep-sea, measuring line and noise ... The crown of everything is state tests that revealed imperfections and jambs that are eliminated on Sevmash. Corrective action will be checked at the control output.
        3. Further revision, painting for delivery and signing of the state act of acceptance of the unit by the fleet. From that moment on, "property" becomes the property of the RF Ministry of Defense.
        Somehow, however, it was before. Maybe now it’s different, but I don’t know this.
  2. +8
    11 February 2020 10: 29
    Still preparing "Prince Oleg" this year for transfer to the Navy. This is encouraging.
    Every year on a new submarine.
    1. +5
      11 February 2020 10: 34
      Every year on a new submarine.

      No.
      The last time an atomic submarine was handed over to the fleet 5 years ago
      1. 0
        11 February 2020 10: 35
        The plans are just that.
        1. +3
          11 February 2020 10: 37
          Still preparing "Prince Oleg" this year for transfer to the Navy

          Given that they didn’t even let her into the water

          As practice shows, the average period from launching to commissioning takes 3-5 years
          1. +6
            11 February 2020 10: 38
            Time will pass, then we'll see. In order not to be unfounded, and argue about anything.
          2. +5
            11 February 2020 12: 49
            As practice shows, the average period from launching to commissioning takes 3-5 years

            Something?
            Vladimir Monomakh completed a little less than 2 years ....
            You do not judge by Dolgoruky, she’s the head one, and the Mace kept her.
      2. +2
        11 February 2020 12: 56
        Quote: Santa Fe
        The last time an atomic submarine was handed over to the fleet 5 years ago

        ????? belay
        1. +2
          11 February 2020 13: 55
          Quote: Gritsa
          ?????

          Alas, this is so. "Vladimir Monomakh" was handed over to the fleet in November 2014. Almost five years ago. He joined the DB in 2016
    2. +3
      11 February 2020 12: 07
      There will be no Oleg this year. He has not yet started mooring.
  3. +2
    11 February 2020 10: 42
    These are strategic arguments, a reminder for the most ... restless, forgetful.
    Again, they have one of the politicians, generals / admirals will not get enough sleep. Well, okay.
  4. qaz
    -8
    11 February 2020 10: 44
    Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
    Three boats of this project are in service (almost 300 nuclear warheads)

    "Borei" are armed with "Bulava", it is monoblock.
    1. +2
      11 February 2020 11: 36
      SLBM Mace with RGCH IN.
      Combat equipment

      According to media reports, the standard military equipment of the rocket includes 6 light separable warheads of individual guidance (RGCH IN) with a capacity of 150 kt.
      Nuclear charges developed by VNIIEF (Sarov) in conjunction with the Ural nuclear center.


      TTX missile 3M-30 "Bulava"

      Length - 12.1 m
      1st stage length - 3.8 m
      Case Diameter - 2 m
      The diameter of the transport and launch container - 2.1 m

      Starting weight - 36,8 t
      1st stage weight - 18,6 t
      Thrown weight - 1150 kg

      Range:
      - 8000 km (according to the project)
      - 9300 km (when starting at maximum range 27.08.2011/XNUMX/XNUMX)
      The height of the apogee of the trajectory is 1000 km
      QUO:
      - 350 m (according to Western data)
      - 120-150 m (estimate)

      https://dfnc.ru/katalog-vooruzhenij/morskie-raketnye-kompleksy/3m-30-bulava/
    2. +2
      11 February 2020 13: 53
      Quote: qaz
      "Borei" are armed with "Bulava", it is monoblock.

      The mace carries 6 blocks 150 kT each
  5. -9
    11 February 2020 11: 03
    "All the finishing work is done, the tests are over. I think it will take another month and a half."
    then in December they’ll surrender
  6. 0
    11 February 2020 11: 40
    Such products do not need to submit dozens of insignificant messages to the media.
  7. +3
    11 February 2020 12: 01
    Beautiful boat. And very different from the previous ones. Even outwardly. Seven feet under the keel! Yes
  8. +2
    11 February 2020 12: 05
    Quote: Maestro Alexander
    Such products are tested in a combat environment. And not around the floating base.

    First on New Year, now on May 9th?

    The masters did not teach that the tests are carried out in laboratory conditions, when the rules, parameters and test methods are precisely defined, the object is hung with a bunch of sensors, everything is accurately measured, and the results are accurately known.
    Nature is always deceiving, and always unpredictable. It is impossible to know the physical conditions exactly, and it is not clear, the product passed the test, or, nevertheless, no.
    And combat conditions are an exam not only of iron, but of many other things — tactics, skills, training, coherence, accuracy of intelligence, control and, of course. properties of iron itself. And LUCK is always important. Do not bring the Lord someday to come to this.
    Forgive the stupidity of the master. He will learn to distinguish. Someday.
  9. 0
    11 February 2020 12: 06
    It seems that the head of the USC produce incorrect reports.
    The Russian newspaper wrote about March in general. The real deadline is the end of May. Not earlier.
    1. +1
      11 February 2020 13: 30
      Yes, at least get out of my way, I see this ship every day, unlike ....
  10. 0
    11 February 2020 12: 12
    Quote: Maestro Alexander
    That's it. Therefore, some people need to forget the Soviet Depot’s habit of timed, and not run around the reception rooms with reports later.

    Therefore, this bastard needs to forget the habit of pouring shit and running around with a report and an open wallet for a contribution for the work done.
  11. +1
    11 February 2020 12: 14
    Quote: Santa Fe
    Every year on a new submarine.

    No.
    The last time an atomic submarine was handed over to the fleet 5 years ago

    When was the last time you were beaten? So, not always a long time is bad.
  12. +1
    11 February 2020 12: 16
    Good news. Given that the Mace was finally taught to fly, it’s very good ...
  13. +7
    11 February 2020 12: 31
    Quote: qaz
    "Borei" are armed with "Bulava", it is monoblock.

    Oh really? So monoblock. And on the breeding platform, 6 seats were made most likely from nothing to do ...

    in front of you is the case of the stage 7 and breeding 3G30 SLBM 3M30 "Bulava" ....
  14. +4
    11 February 2020 12: 41
    Better late than never. And quality.
    1. +2
      12 February 2020 00: 01
      If you build a ship for 10 years and then carry out comprehensive tests for another 5 years (using the example of Kazan), the ship will become obsolete to a large extent

      Late than never - this is not about industry. Everything has its own reasonable time frame.
  15. +2
    11 February 2020 14: 37
    before, for 10 years they don’t rent anything, now they donate every year, which’s good
  16. -1
    11 February 2020 22: 04
    Quote: Santa Fe
    The last time an atomic submarine was handed over to the fleet 5 years ago

    Well, this is too often. The term can be increased to 10 years old that way.
  17. 0
    11 February 2020 22: 23
    from them already fart with fear when still on the slipway