In Ukraine: Crimean bridge can be considered a military target


The so-called coordinator of the site “Information Resistance” (“IS” - a platform on which the activity of the notorious D. Tymchuk at one time showed, ending with “unsuccessful cleaning” weapons») Konstantin Mashovets for the Ukrainian media commented on the opening of the railway connection on the Crimean bridge in Russia. According to Mashovets, the Crimean bridge "can now be considered a military facility."


An IS spokesperson said that Russian troops in the Crimea "experienced supply difficulties," and now:

The bridge is able to provide a significant reduction in the shoulder of the ride. And therefore, the logistics of the supply of the Crimean military group will improve significantly.

According to Mashovets, the bridge increases mobility and maneuverability of the force grouping.

A statement by Mr. Mashovets draws for the Captain Evidence award. Indeed, by exactly the same logic, any bridge of the world can be called a “completely military object”, since it can, if necessary, supply troops.

By the way, one cannot hear those Ukrainian "experts" who tried to convince everyone of the "impossibility" to build a bridge across the Kerch Strait 2-3 years ago.

Putting aside the comments of Ukrainian "experts", it can be noted that the St. Petersburg - Sevastopol train first crossed the Krymsky Bridge tonight. This is the 7th train, the day before yesterday left the Moscow station of the Northern capital. In fact, the whole country watched the dispatch of the train in news stories. This morning the train will arrive in the hero city of Sevastopol.
Photos used:
Crimean Bridge website
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. maidan.izrailovich 25 December 2019 06: 03 New
    • 25
    • 12
    +13
    ... it can be considered ...

    Some and Bandera fascists for people think. They are conducting some negotiations with them. Even they are given money under the guise of payment for transit. Which should have been "give a tooth" to finish after December 31, 2019. But apparently they will not finish.
    1. olhon 25 December 2019 06: 08 New
      • 20
      • 36
      -16
      Screwed up to the fullest. Bummer with SP2 and the new Agreement, links of one chain.
      1. bistrov. 25 December 2019 06: 38 New
        • 32
        • 12
        +20
        Quote: olhon
        Screwed to the fullest

        Talk nonsense. There is no "breakdown" here. There is a well-known compromise. Gazprom even goes to pay 2,5 billion by decision of the Stockholm arbitration. Or do you want the EU countries to abandon Russian gas? The United States and Qatar will rub their hands and calculate profits, while Russia will suffer losses and a drop in the standard of living of the people. There are agreements on the supply of energy products to European countries and Russia must ensure their delivery. Not provide-fines. SP-2 and TP-2 are not yet ready and will not be ready for at least another six months. How to transit gas to Europe? Will you carry in bags? You're probably not young anymore? Turn on your head. The new agreement provides for a certain reduction in the amount of gas flowing through ukroGTS from 65 billion to 40, which makes it unprofitable. Here and let them think.
        1. olhon 25 December 2019 07: 37 New
          • 7
          • 15
          -8
          I wrote about SP2.
          1. Nastia makarova 25 December 2019 08: 17 New
            • 14
            • 6
            +8
            sp2 WILL BE NEXT YEAR CONSTRUCTED AS PLANNED 2 YEARS BACK
          2. Nyrobsky 25 December 2019 13: 21 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: olhon
            I wrote about SP2.

            Who cares? The ideal idea for mattresses was that transit to Europe would stop altogether from the new year, and alternative routes TP and SP-2 would not be implemented. With transit, they broke off, because it is extended, and gas pipelines, with some delay, will still be completed. If the dill side insisted on pumping at 10 years and 90 billion cubic meters a year, then it got everything in half - 5 years and 45 billion, while at the same time it nullified its claims for 12 billion payments from Gazprom. Gazprom’s debt to the dill side of 3 billion was recognized by the international court, as well as the loan of 3 billion that Yanukovych received was also recognized by the international court as a public debt to be repaid, and now the question arises of satisfying 3X3 mutual claims .... by court decision ! Here we recognize, but here we do not recognize, no longer rolls. Where's the bummer?
            1. olhon 26 December 2019 01: 38 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              On June 9, 2015, Gazprom confirmed its intention to stop gas transit through Ukraine after 2019. There will be no extension or conclusion of a new contract under any circumstances. The question is closed completely ... 4 years have passed ...
              1. Procopius Nesterov 26 December 2019 02: 57 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                It didn’t work out a bit, and what is now at a loss to stop transit? We get billions of dollars for gas. Emotional tantrums have nothing to do with it.
              2. Nyrobsky 26 December 2019 10: 32 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: olhon
                On June 9, 2015, Gazprom confirmed its intention to stop gas transit through Ukraine after 2019. There will be no extension or conclusion of a new contract under any circumstances. The question is closed completely ... 4 years have passed ...

                The timely voiced “threat” works for the future. This was aimed at making the European "partners" more compliant in starting the construction of the gas pipeline and ceasing to harbor the illusion that the Russian Federation would date the Ukrainian economy on an ongoing basis. After that, we managed to agree with them, agree on a project, draw up an estimate, attract investment and begin construction. Prior to this statement, none of the Europeans had even scratched themselves.
      2. Al_lexx 25 December 2019 06: 56 New
        • 10
        • 4
        +6
        Quote: olhon
        Screwed up to the fullest. Bummer with SP2 and the new Agreement, links of one chain.

        Read here to understand the situation. Whose bummer, where bummer and why bummer.
        https://regnum.ru/news/economy/2814472.html
        1. olhon 25 December 2019 07: 41 New
          • 6
          • 10
          -4
          Thank. There about the contract. I’m indignant about SP2 ..
          1. Al_lexx 25 December 2019 10: 27 New
            • 2
            • 4
            -2
            Read carefully.
            They do not speak directly about SP-2, but the meaning between the lines is guessed.
        2. olhon 25 December 2019 14: 14 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          https://topwar.ru/166127-neletalnoe-oruzhie-kapitalizma-ssha-naschupali-slaboe-mesto-sovremennoj-rossii.html тут почитайте.
    2. Same lech 25 December 2019 06: 09 New
      • 15
      • 5
      +10
      .
      Even they are given money under the guise of payment for transit

      Yes ... I agree with the budget of our country, we can say we are fueling the Nazi regime of Bandera in Ukraine ... in general, we can say that the US policy towards Russia to fight at the expense of Russia with the help of Ukraine is unfortunately implemented.
      1. bessmertniy 25 December 2019 06: 18 New
        • 5
        • 5
        0
        In any case, we have the ability to shut off the gas. stop And this opportunity must be used. Indeed, from the fact that they agreed on transit, the West has not canceled the sanctions against Russia. negative
    3. Den717 25 December 2019 06: 15 New
      • 17
      • 12
      +5
      Quote: maidan.izrailovich
      Some and Bandera fascists for people think. They are conducting some negotiations with them. Even they are given money under the guise of payment for transit.

      Be consistent and specific. What do you offer? Fulfill the blue dream of the USA and stop the GTS of Ukraine. And then what? Count two or three consequences .... Gas shortages in Europe, rising gas prices at European hubs, LNG coming there, increasing energy costs and the cost of European products, decreasing their competitiveness ... ... fines for Gazprom for failure to fulfill contractual obligations. This is if it is extremely short. Do you want that? Well kiss in ..... your friend, Soros ...... laughing
      1. certero 25 December 2019 06: 20 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Or maybe it was necessary to complete the northern stream 2 and 3 long before that?
        1. maidan.izrailovich 25 December 2019 06: 38 New
          • 17
          • 4
          +13
          .. long before that ?.

          For a long time before that, it was necessary to clear the party from the Gorbachev-Yakovlev ones. Now there would be no such topic at all.
          1. hydrox 25 December 2019 07: 54 New
            • 8
            • 0
            +8
            Then the situation was different and there was no way to slap them.
            But the KGB had ALL reasons to look even closer to the “Chicago boys”, but it didn’t work out: even then the KGB got a taste for political games and they didn’t have time to fulfill their direct functions.
        2. Den717 25 December 2019 08: 37 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Quote: certero
          Or maybe it was necessary to complete the northern stream 2 and 3 long before that?

          Maybe it would have been necessary, but you won’t start cooking your 60th birthday at 30. So here. Each vegetable has its own season ... and demand, and financing, etc.
        3. Paranoid50 25 December 2019 11: 55 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          Quote: certero
          Nord Stream 2 and 3 long before that?

          Exactly, that year in 2000. yesAnd they would scratch their turnips - what to fill with? request laughing
          But the schedule, I have a schedule
          And all that is not on schedule
          Nafig, nafig, nafig ...

          A. Kortnev
          1. certero 25 December 2019 22: 04 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Already in 2004 everything was clear
      2. Same lech 25 December 2019 06: 21 New
        • 20
        • 4
        +16
        Fulfill the blue dream of the USA and stop the GTS of Ukraine.

        The blue dream of the United States that Russia contains and pays for all the wishes of the United States ... a trend towards this is outlined in Russian politics.
        Soros will also be glad of this.
        We pay WADA for the shame that they have arranged for us ... we pay PACE to water us there ... we pay the WTO to put all kinds of restrictions on us ... well, this is good.
        1. rich 25 December 2019 06: 45 New
          • 4
          • 2
          +2
          D. Tymchuk: Crimean bridge can be considered a military facility

          I don’t know how to cry or laugh. As soon as Mr. Timchuk hadn’t bowed the Mosfilm cartoon before, and then the ba-ripened laughing Maybe I got a new training manual?
          1. Sonmaster 25 December 2019 09: 31 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Well, about the "Crimean bridge can be considered a military target," said Mashovts, and Tymchuk already if he says anything, then only to the apostles, or demons.
            We need this pepper - Mashovets, give a personalized gun ....
          2. Sergej1972 25 December 2019 09: 37 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Tymchuk for several months in the next world. Read the material carefully.
      3. maidan.izrailovich 25 December 2019 06: 35 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Well kiss in ..... your friend, Soros .....

        Here is this phrase from a lack or excess of imagination? Control yourself. And then what good of an overabundance of emotions urinates to start urinating for yourself. crying
    4. knn54 25 December 2019 07: 07 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      In logistics in the Republic of Ingushetia, the USSR, and the Russian Federation, railway played and plays a large role — quickly and inexpensively. So the RAILWAY (roads) only enhances the military value of the bridge.
    5. Piramidon 25 December 2019 09: 00 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: maidan.izrailovich
      Even they are given money under the guise of payment for transit. Which should have been "give a tooth" to finish after December 31, 2019.

      No one promised a complete cessation of transit, because even with the commissioning of the SP-2, its capacity will not be enough to supply Europe with gas under contracts. They always said that 15-20 billion cubic meters will have to be pumped through 404.
  2. Zaurbek 25 December 2019 06: 06 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The bridge is always a very important military facility.
    1. Vladimir_2U 25 December 2019 06: 09 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      I will bring ukroystery - this bridge is also STRATEGIC !!!
    2. bessmertniy 25 December 2019 06: 15 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      And any products also have military significance, since they can be included in the ration. wink
      1. Air force 25 December 2019 06: 35 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        And Russia, in this logic, is one military base, on the border with Ukraine, with strategic military facilities in the form of roads, forests, fields and rivers laughing
        1. bessmertniy 25 December 2019 07: 24 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Probably, according to the logic of banderlogs, any Russian baby is already a fighter of the army of the enemy of Ukraine. repeat negative
          1. hydrox 25 December 2019 07: 59 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            It’s not yet, and according to the Constitution that exists today, a patriot cannot be raised from a child (yes, the authorities don’t need it yet), but the issue of changing the constitution is becoming more and more relevant along with the growth of social tension.
    3. Piramidon 25 December 2019 09: 02 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Zaurbek
      The bridge is always a very important military facility.

      Especially when the Supreme Commander drives it on an "armored train". lol
  3. Den717 25 December 2019 06: 07 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The bridge is able to provide a significant reduction in the shoulder of the ride. And therefore, the logistics of the supply of the Crimean military group will improve significantly.
    According to Mashovets, the bridge increases mobility and maneuverability of the force grouping.

    By this logic, each residential building is also a military facility, because any residential building is a place of concentration of people - a mobilization military resource. The logical chain of the use of the armed forces of Ukraine to destroy the civilian population of their own country is closed. Therefore, the prospects for a peaceful settlement in the Donbass are very illusive.
  4. Adimius38 25 December 2019 06: 22 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    America discovered - bridges during the war have always been considered particularly important military installations
    1. bessmertniy 25 December 2019 07: 27 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Yes. In Serbia during the collapse of Yugoslavia, NATO aviation paid particular attention to the bombing of bridges.
    2. Eug
      Eug 25 December 2019 09: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Several bridges usually converge to bridges. And regarding the other branch (the first liberation of Kharkov) - some historians believe that the ultimate goal of the advance of our troops should be to capture the only stationary railway bridge in Zaporozhye, through which the entire southern wing of the German army was supplied ...
  5. Mavrikiy 25 December 2019 06: 28 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In Ukraine: Crimean bridge can be considered a military target
    Exactly, then you can bomb it? request Well then, as a regime object, it has the right to "preventive protection from a fool" fire to defeat, for trying to get closer.
    1. Same lech 25 December 2019 06: 44 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      As a regime object, he has the right to "preventive protection from the fool" fire to defeat, for trying to get closer.

      smile The aggressor may lose the toilet again ... is there really anyone who wants to arrange this circus again. what
      1. hydrox 25 December 2019 08: 06 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        If you swear so terribly at Ukrainian armored boats, calling them toilets, then they can be offended and drown right from the mooring wall with grief. laughing
      2. Lelek 25 December 2019 14: 32 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: The same Lech
        The aggressor may lose the toilet again ... is there really anyone who wants to arrange this circus again.

        hi , Alexei
        But what, the history of recent decades has not demonstrated recklessness, abomination and lack of maturity of the Svidomo "elite"? In this (sorry for the expression) "state" there can be anything you want, except reason. An example of this is the restructuring of the agreements signed in Paris. The most recent violation of the “all for all” prisoner exchange agreement.

        So, go for any provocation approved by the “Sam” for Banderite, as two fingers on the asphalt, with complete paralysis of the hetman’s power.
  6. sergo1914 25 December 2019 06: 42 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    An armored train can ride on it. And not one.
    1. Same lech 25 December 2019 06: 47 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      One for the eyes is enough ... especially if he will be with Caliber or Iskander.
      1. hydrox 25 December 2019 08: 12 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And figs to break the train schedule?
        Any missile weapon is more convenient and more accurate to use not in the mobile version, but from a solid foundation.
        And yet :: is it against what military facilities of Ukraine did Russia need to use an armored train?
        1. Same lech 25 December 2019 08: 14 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Any missile weapon is more convenient and more accurate to use not in the mobile version, but from a solid foundation.

          Stationary installations are easier to destroy ... they are not able to maneuver in order to escape from the enemy’s strike.
          Therefore, it is better to have several variants of missile weapons for all cases of enemy aggression.
          1. hydrox 25 December 2019 08: 55 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Question :: What weapons of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces today can hit the Crimean Bridge object?
            Answer: Skakuas doesn’t have such a weapon that can be used against the bridge “for free” today. The amount of retaliation may well be equal to the size of the whole of New Russia, exempt from the yoke of Banedera’s.
            1. Same lech 25 December 2019 08: 57 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Well, their pastor recently boasted of a new achievement ... let's see how far they go.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. hydrox 25 December 2019 10: 07 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  something wings were not visible ...
  7. rotmistr60 25 December 2019 06: 52 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    any bridge in the world can be called a “completely military object”
    It is true that it is not worth going into details. Well, the "true" Ukrainians can only wish to continue to believe that the Crimean bridge is a special effect of Mosfilm, and even this special effect will soon fall apart if the Ukrainians desire it. What is the demand from the "village doctor"?
  8. Non liberoid Russian 25 December 2019 07: 02 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Svidomo schizophrenia declare the new season open ...
  9. Kelwin 25 December 2019 07: 07 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Does he also know how to count?) O_o)) Fabulous (s)))
  10. nikvic46 25 December 2019 07: 09 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    You’ll admire the bridge. We are often called invaders in Ukraine. "Occupants do not build bridges" -Lugovoi
    1. bessmertniy 25 December 2019 07: 33 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      They call it "invaders" !? what Or maybe they just dream of being occupied, fed, clothed and allowed to further transit gas? belay repeat what
    2. hydrox 25 December 2019 08: 16 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: nikvic46
      "Invaders do not build bridges"

      Invaders destroy them :: a bridge in Lugansk, two bridges in Kiev (one fell, the other cannot rise laughing ) - in spring, the skakuas will begin a landslide "bridgefall"
  11. Lord of the Sith 25 December 2019 07: 19 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Well, what about a military facility, a bridge was drawn in Mosfilm laughing
  12. 2112vda 25 December 2019 07: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Here, again, to the place Lavrov’s statement: “Morons ...”.
    1. andrewkor 25 December 2019 08: 01 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      You are more careful with quotes, I just got the BAN for the abbreviation of these winged words!
  13. Basarev 25 December 2019 07: 55 New
    • 2
    • 5
    -3
    Is it really built so hunchbacked? This is the century before last.
    1. andrewkor 25 December 2019 08: 06 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      In your opinion, for beauty it was necessary from Taman to Kerch to lift up 100 meters like in Istanbul or in Frisco?
      Of course, if you stretch yourself 100 times, then you can also tamper such a "beauty"! ☺☺☺! ??
      1. Basarev 25 December 2019 08: 08 New
        • 3
        • 4
        -1
        I still think that it was more correct to dig a tunnel - and it’s cheaper and does not block the beautiful view of the Sea of ​​Azov.
        1. andrewkor 25 December 2019 08: 38 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          By the way, the subway and other tunnels are also the _19th century!
        2. Ros 56 25 December 2019 10: 05 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Well, shovel and crowbar in hand and go, otherwise he thinks. Do not count, but work. laughing laughing laughing hi
    2. Nastia makarova 25 December 2019 08: 19 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      who is the hunchback? there is a straight line expensive with a slight elevation for the arch of the main passage of the ships !!! otherwise how will the ships go?
    3. Terenin 25 December 2019 11: 36 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Basarev
      Is it really built so hunchbacked? .

      Well yes winked when you look at the bridge while lying on the couch, it seems to be humpbacked ... you will go on foot ... too long crying You look from the coast - a curve belay Well, a copy of Russia ...
      Ah, we like her ... drinks
  14. Bear040 25 December 2019 08: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    In this case, the Russian Federation should be considered military targets all Bandera burrows and government cottages, near Kiev ...
  15. Chingachguk 25 December 2019 08: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    There is a fake bridge! Why worry then !!! ???
  16. Dynamic systems 25 December 2019 08: 46 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    This is all wonderful. Bridge etc.
    But the silence on the air that Novorossiysk, Gelendzhik and the surrounding settlements, the third day without water. The accident, they say, in the aqueduct. Pipes 30 years old, etc. I.P.
    And how many S.T.Y.R.I.L. and local managers from this pipe? All the loot allocated for repair, replacement, etc.?
    1. ZAV69 25 December 2019 10: 45 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I just don’t understand what does the bridge have to do with it if the maneuvers were stolen? Managers in prison, property in the treasury.
  17. olhon 25 December 2019 09: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Nastia Makarova
    sp2 WILL BE NEXT YEAR CONSTRUCTED AS PLANNED 2 YEARS BACK

    Something I missed. I thought that it was planned to launch this year ..
  18. Maalkavianin 25 December 2019 09: 16 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It’s interesting, what if they really bring down the bridge. How do we respond? Express concern?
  19. Eug
    Eug 25 December 2019 09: 20 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And once the train N7 Sevastopol - St. Petersburg went through Kharkov ... and many more ...
  20. Prisoner 25 December 2019 09: 36 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Any bridge is military. In Ukraine, did not know this?
  21. Ros 56 25 December 2019 10: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It doesn’t matter if the Crimean bridge is a military or civilian object, it will be protected as the “Pearl of Russia” and the barmels will not be bonded when attacking it.
  22. rocket757 25 December 2019 10: 14 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    According to Mashovets, the bridge increases mobility and maneuverability of the force grouping.

    pan evidence .... this calmed down, and then no matter what happens.
  23. Cowbra 25 December 2019 10: 26 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    And your capital can be considered an authority. By the way, NOT Photoshop:
  24. loha 25 December 2019 11: 43 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Any bridge in any country is a military facility and ...... it is protected
  25. 3vs
    3vs 25 December 2019 12: 45 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Indeed, by exactly the same logic, any bridge of the world can be called a “completely military object”, since it can, if necessary, supply troops.

    So it is!
    Bridges are strategic objects of our "partners", I think they are marked as legitimate goals, if that ...
  26. DMB-2020 25 December 2019 13: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, if so, then you can bomb it like Voronezh.
  27. NF68 25 December 2019 15: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Mashkvtsa and others like him can be considered completely sick.
  28. Lena Petrova 26 December 2019 22: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: olhon
    On June 9, 2015, Gazprom confirmed its intention to stop gas transit through Ukraine after 2019.

    So who can predict 100% congressmen from overseas countries who have left the reels? Tomorrow may come up with something else.