Military Review

Naval aviation of the Russian Navy with hypersonic “Daggers” will cover the Russian Arctic

39
Naval aviation of the Russian Navy with hypersonic “Daggers” will cover the Russian Arctic

Marine aviation will adopt the "Dagger" hypersonic missile systems. The Ministry of Defense decided to cover the northern and Kamchatka directions with hypersonic missiles.


The military department decided to deploy hypersonic dagger missile systems on the Kola Peninsula and Kamchatka. The missiles will go into service with aviation regiments armed with the MiG-31. According to Izvestia, citing sources in the military department, the timing of the integration of the RK “Dagger” into the aviation of the Russian Navy depends on the fulfillment of the state defense order, i.e. re-equipment of MiG-31 interceptors for missile carriers.

Most likely, under the hypersonic RK "Dagger" will be converted aircraft of two military units from the naval aviation of the Russian Navy, armed with MIG-31 interceptors - in Monchegorsk in the Murmansk region and in Yelizovo in Kamchatka.

It is assumed that with the receipt by sea aviation of hypersonic "Daggers", Russia will completely close the Arctic, as well as the Northern Sea Route. Aircraft based on the Kola Peninsula will control the space from the coast of Iceland to the Kara Sea, and from the Kamchatka Peninsula the waters of the East Siberian, Okhotsk and Bering Seas are completely covered.

At the end of November this year, the Ministry of Defense reported on past tests of the dagger hypersonic missile system in arctic conditions. The missile was launched by the MiG-31K for a target located at the Pemboy training ground to the north-east of Vorkuta, which it successfully hit.

Recall that the newest Russian air carrier "Dagger" includes the MiG-31K fighter-interceptor, specially upgraded as a carrier of a hypersonic missile, which is an aircraft version of the Iskander-M OTRK missile.

Earlier it was reported that the squadron MiG-31K with "Daggers" has been on duty in the Southern Military District since December 2017 of the year, and since April 2018, the MiG-31K planes carry out regular flights over the Black and Caspian Seas.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Hunter 2
    Hunter 2 20 December 2019 09: 58 New
    +2
    This is the thing! good Essential help to the Fleet!
    1. rich
      rich 20 December 2019 10: 13 New
      +6
      Most likely, under the hypersonic RK "Dagger" will be converted aircraft of two military units from the naval aviation of the Russian Navy, armed with MIG-31 interceptors - in Monchegorsk in the Murmansk region and in Yelizovo in Kamchatka.

      Infrastructure allows.
      Repair of the runway in Monchegorsk was completed in October 2013, and repair of the runway in Yelizovo in the summer of 2016. . Its length was almost 3,5 thousand meters.
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 20 December 2019 11: 47 New
        +1
        It seems that Monchegorsk regiment did not belong to the Navy before? I remember that people walked in green uniforms there.
        1. NN52
          NN52 20 December 2019 12: 54 New
          +2
          Piramidon
          There guys since 2015 with "daggers" go)
          1. Piramidon
            Piramidon 20 December 2019 13: 32 New
            0
            Quote: NN52
            There guys since 2015 with "daggers" go)

            I was in Monchegorsk in the 70s - 80s of the last century. We went there, being on business trips in Olenegorsk (High) to drink beer. hi
    2. Rusland
      Rusland 20 December 2019 16: 57 New
      +3
      Quote: Hunter 2
      This is the thing! good Essential help to the Fleet!

      Good health, Alex hi Agree yes, one to help, and another to burden. smile
  2. Victor_B
    Victor_B 20 December 2019 09: 59 New
    -3
    This is, of course, wonderful!
    But!
    As if behind bravura speeches, what the hell ...
    Although if the adversary is VERY respected by our Iskanders, and the Dagger (judging by the sofa examinations) is the same rocket, don't be afraid even more! For it can fly away.
    Well, as they say, for OUR victory!
    1. Sky strike fighter
      Sky strike fighter 20 December 2019 10: 07 New
      0
      By the way, the information on the Iskanders is interesting.
      The Iskander operational-tactical missile systems were armed with a unique long-range missile capable of hitting targets at distances of up to 2 thousand kilometers, although until now the capabilities of the OTRK were limited to a range of only 500 kilometers.

      Such information follows from the infographic presented by Rostec Corporation, which captures all types of Russian Iskander missile systems, including the basic version of the Iskander missile system, a modernized version of the Iskander-M missile system, and one equipped with two Iskander cruise missiles -K ", which can be equipped with missiles capable of covering distances of up to 2 thousand kilometers.

      http://avia.pro/news/dalnost-polyota-raket-iskander-uvelichena-v-4-raza-do-2-tys-kilometrov
      1. Air force
        Air force 20 December 2019 11: 09 New
        +2
        By reference, infographics are presented and it says about 2 thousand km and Iskander-K. But where the picture itself is not clear from is not available on the sites roe.ru, kbm.ru, rostec.ru and there is no similar infographic for the similar flight range of the Iskander-K rocket. The picture smacks of subtle provocation in order to pump information. space about the validity of the US exit from the INF. Since the type they were right and in Russia Iskanders can hit 2000km. I would be grateful if you post a link to the official source with this infographic. I would like to rejoice reasonably and see data on the distance from the manufacturer of Iskanders, and not from the manufacturer of articles about Iskander. Well, of course, if this data is not secret, and if the data on the range is secret then the article is fake and provocation. IMHO.
        1. vkfriendly
          vkfriendly 20 December 2019 12: 14 New
          0
          And what’s not clear here, a nuclear b / h weighs less, so the rocket will fly further than with TNT. And they can be started with both, and therefore the range is different.
    2. Mar.Tirah
      Mar.Tirah 20 December 2019 10: 14 New
      +8
      Quote: Victor_B
      As if behind bravura speeches, what the hell was not hidden ..

      Gorbachev made us the zrada in 1988, when he destroyed his sword in the Bering Strait by letting the RSD-10 Pioneer SS-20 SABER in Gudyma under a bulldozer, and then he finished off the shield, removing the 25th Air Defense Division from duty, thereby completely exposing the entire north of the Far East .That was then zrada, the Yankers rejoiced and felt at home there. I think now they will no longer feel comfortable there when the lightning hangs overhead.
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 20 December 2019 10: 15 New
        +7
        Humpbacked is the Judas of the Soviet flood!
        More than him only boriska harm the country caused. The truth is already different - Russia.
      2. Vadim02rus
        Vadim02rus 20 December 2019 10: 20 New
        0
        Gradachev made us the hijack in 1988

        Well, why are you like this? The USSR was Paradise on Earth, and you with your Gorbachev (
    3. Chaldon48
      Chaldon48 20 December 2019 10: 30 New
      +3
      Maybe someone remembers the work "Sullen River" on it another film was shot. Like there, one character of a Caucasian character of Asian origin, defending his master, shouted: "You can’t see a dagger, you want death!"
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 20 December 2019 10: 32 New
        +2
        Quote: Chaldon48
        one character is of Caucasian origin

        But didn’t he then be torn in half by horses? Or birches?
        The book, she, was more subdued than the kin.
      2. Proton
        Proton 20 December 2019 10: 43 New
        0
        And then this master, betrayed his servant laughing like the analogy is not very, or the Karamazov brothers what
        1. Chaldon48
          Chaldon48 20 December 2019 12: 47 New
          +1
          And full analogs do not exist at all.
  3. askort154
    askort154 20 December 2019 09: 59 New
    0
    State defense - grows stronger every year! The swamp is left behind. yes
    1. Vasya I.
      Vasya I. 20 December 2019 10: 01 New
      0
      Naval aviation of the Russian Navy with hypersonic "Daggers" will cover the Russian Arctic.

      Isn't she covered yet?
      1. bessmertniy
        bessmertniy 20 December 2019 10: 19 New
        0
        It’s covered, but with “Daggers” this business will be more reliable. bully
  4. Andrey Chistyakov
    Andrey Chistyakov 20 December 2019 10: 03 New
    -1
    Wonderful!!!!
  5. Pavel57
    Pavel57 20 December 2019 10: 11 New
    +4
    MiG-31 as an interceptor is no longer needed?
    1. Proton
      Proton 20 December 2019 10: 45 New
      -1
      In principle, probably not, with the current air defense, but, as a missile carrier, it’s very
      1. snc
        snc 20 December 2019 11: 21 New
        +4
        It is also necessary, and it’s much better to intercept carriers than to allow them to deplete air defense with weapons.
    2. vkfriendly
      vkfriendly 20 December 2019 12: 18 New
      -1
      And why if there are missiles faster and more accurately.
  6. rudolff
    rudolff 20 December 2019 10: 51 New
    +10
    The only question is whether the dagger can work on a moving target. If so, then such a rearmament is possible and makes sense.
    1. snc
      snc 20 December 2019 11: 09 New
      +4
      And there is still a question with target designation at a distance of more than 500 km, the A100 would probably cope, but when they were actually launched into the series ....
  7. Pavel57
    Pavel57 20 December 2019 10: 52 New
    +1
    There is enough MiG-31 in the reserves, it can be taken from the storage base for modernization.
    1. NN52
      NN52 20 December 2019 11: 50 New
      +4
      So they do ... Nobody will be MiG 31 BM (standing in Monchegorsk, and more recently in Yelizovo), remodel into MiG 31 K.
  8. rocket757
    rocket757 20 December 2019 11: 09 New
    +2
    Naval aviation of the Russian Navy with hypersonic “Daggers” will cover the Russian Arctic

    It is normal to continue to develop all the necessary components of our armed forces!
  9. Gust
    Gust 20 December 2019 12: 22 New
    +2
    Quote: snc
    And there is still a question with target designation at a distance of more than 500 km, the A100 would probably cope, but when they were actually launched into the series ....

    There are also reconnaissance and target designation aircraft, except for the A100. And there, the drones will catch up. In general, there should be so- general reconnaissance by satellites, more specifically, UAVs or RC aircraft. If there is any kind of GOS in this complex, then there are no problems with the control unit in the final section (judging by the different color of the nose fairing, it is), and during the flight time the target will not have time to leave the capture area.
    1. snc
      snc 20 December 2019 13: 22 New
      0
      And what do we have that can detect an adversary walking in radio silence mode at a range of 1000km?
  10. 5-9
    5-9 20 December 2019 13: 12 New
    -1
    I’m even afraid to imagine what kind of surface targets threatening the Northern Sea Route the Daggers may have ...
  11. Ros 56
    Ros 56 20 December 2019 13: 50 New
    +1
    It is also necessary to make MiGs of the thirty-first hundred and a half, otherwise the current ones will not be enough.
  12. Lontus
    Lontus 20 December 2019 14: 00 New
    -1
    What will they protect the Arctic from?
    Large surface ships are not there and will not be.
    Command centers too.

    Features of the "dagger" - range and stealth deployment, better suited
    for the west, southwest and southeast of Russia.
  13. Lontus
    Lontus 20 December 2019 14: 07 New
    -1
    It's funny, but as a carrier of “Daggers” the MiG-25 would be better suited than the MiG-31:
    - cheaper
    - speed and altitude greater
    - one pilot is enough


    The Mig-31 has a lot of redundant functions that are not needed for use as an accelerating stage of aeroballistic missiles.
  14. Old26
    Old26 20 December 2019 14: 51 New
    +5
    Quote: Air Force
    I would be grateful if you post a link to the official source with this infographic.

    Do not wait. there is no such link in nature. Rumors of a range of 2000 km have been going on for three or four years. especially "advanced" users, based on such rumors, began to draw areas of destruction by a cruise missile. Moreover, officialdom speaks of 500 km, and all these "infographics" including and about a range of 2000 or even 2500 km. Most often, such a scribble - the authors "keep in mind" data on missiles such as X-55 or S-10 of the 80s ....

    Quote: vkfriendly
    And what’s not clear here, a nuclear b / h weighs less, so the rocket will fly further than with TNT. And they can be started with both, and therefore the range is different.

    But at the same time, the rocket cannot have four times the long range. Even the same “Caliber” 3M14 in the conventional version has a range of 1500 km, but there is no officially confirmed range of 2500 km for a product with a safety standard. Only texts in the media

    Quote: Mar. Tira
    Gorbachev made us the zrada in 1988, when he destroyed his sword in the Bering Strait by letting the RSD-10 Pioneer SS-20 SABER in Gudyma under a bulldozer, and then he finished off the shield, removing the 25th Air Defense Division from duty, thereby completely exposing the entire north of the Far East .That was then zrada, the Yankers rejoiced and felt at home there. I think now they will no longer feel comfortable there when the lightning hangs overhead.

    Oleg! Do not repeat and distribute the fake about the "Pioneers" in Gudyma. They never stood there. The regiment stationed in Gudym ceased to exist on June 1, 1969. Moreover, even this regiment was not fully deployed. Only one division in the composition of 4 ground launchers of missiles R-14.

    In the 80s, work was carried out to address the possibility of deploying Pioneers in Anadyr. The decision was due to the balance of the head of the commission involved in this, General Kozydub, head of the PGRK to the General Staff of the Strategic Missile Forces. It was NEGATIVE. Thanks to this, millions of rubles were saved and were not allowed to go down the drain. The same Kozydub described it very well in his book "Seven Commanders-in-Chief"

    Quote: bessmertniy
    It’s covered, but with “Daggers” this business will be more reliable. bully

    A moot point. Especially when you consider that the shelves will be based in Monchegorsk and Yelizovo. Some area will be covered (Kamchatka, Kola Peninsula). but not the whole Arctic

    Quote: rudolff
    The only question is whether the dagger can work on a moving target. If so, then such a rearmament is possible and makes sense.

    So far, Rudolph, there is only information that he worked on a fixed target at the training grounds. Last year at a range of 800 km. I didn’t listen to a longer range ...

    Quote: Rafale
    There are also reconnaissance and target designation aircraft, except for the A100. And there, the drones will catch up. In general, there should be so- general reconnaissance by satellites, more specifically, UAVs or RC aircraft. If there is any kind of GOS in this complex, then there are no problems with the control unit in the final section (judging by the different color of the nose fairing, it is), and during the flight time the target will not have time to leave the capture area.

    1. Drones pull up when they are in service. And not just drones, but some kind of target designation aircraft. I have not heard something about such yet.

    2. General satellite intelligence is not real-time intelligence. And what can a satellite show? American AUG? So it is not and is not expected in the Arctic. Enemy aircraft at the airport? Or some ship on the NSR?

    3. There are not so many reconnaissance and target designation aircraft in service. How many of them will be involved in the North ???

    4. Even if there is a GOS on the “Dagger”, it must first go to the target area in order for the GOS to capture the target.
    And for this there must be an external target designation
  15. kit88
    kit88 20 December 2019 18: 28 New
    +5
    Listen, Monchegorsk is not Rezinovsk.
    I somehow don’t understand, now there are two regiments or one? 98 and 174. So if the MiG-31K is driven, then it’s time to create the 3rd regiment.
    Are there few places? No, it's time to re-open airfields.
  16. Tests
    Tests 20 December 2019 20: 24 New
    +2
    kit88 (Alexander), respected, it seems, not until the restoration of the country's airfields in the Murmansk region. The grassy lawn, under the roof that the cormorants pecked, is more needed for 22 millionaires with a ball ... True, Arkhangelsk has Talagi, where reconstruction is underway and promised that it will be able to accept all types of airplanes and where the regiment with the MiG-31 is 10 years old based. There they promised to extend the strip to 3000 m. Not everything is stolen there, as in Lakhta, where they even managed to sell a strip ...