Marshal Haftar's Libyan Army Continues Offensive on Tripoli

Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drone shot down in the southern suburbs of Tripoli

The Libyan National Army (LNA), under the command of Marshal Khalifa Haftar, during a Thursday attack on the Libyan capital Tripoli, launched a series of military strikes aviation according to the positions of the PNS (government of national accord) forces east of the capital. This was reported by Al Arabiya.

The combat aircraft of the LNA bombed the territory of the flight school located in Misurat, 200 km from Tripoli, where significant forces supporting the PNA are located. Earlier, the Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drone, which was shot down by LNA forces in the southern suburbs of Tripoli Ain Zare, was launched from the school's territory.

The LNA forces managed to gain a foothold in the southern suburbs of the capital Ain Zara, the army continues to develop the offensive. In addition, the Khamza military camp was captured, which was repeatedly used by the PNS forces for counterattacks. Battles are fought in the areas of Al-Aziziyah, Hallya al-Furdzhan (in 10 km south of the center of Tripoli) and the route near the long-functioning capital international airport.

It is reported that during the MiG-21 LNA Haftar raid on Misurata Airport, a Turkish-owned Boeing 747 was allegedly destroyed. However, this information is unverified and it is currently impossible to confirm it. The photographs posted on the Web show a glow of fire and some buildings, but because of the night darkness, something is difficult to make out.

In turn, despite local media reports, Libyan Prime Minister Fayez Sarraj continues to argue that there is no Libyan National Army (LNA) offensive by Marshal Khalifa Haftar in the capital of Tripoli.

There is no control and assault on Tripoli and its areas

- he said.

Haftar announced a decisive attack on Tripoli with the task of taking possession of the capital on Thursday evening, addressing the Libyan people with a video message.

Comments

[rufaqn]

Havtor's army is the right "barmaley" or not? How to disassemble them there? Ukraine is in the process of supplying weapons to both sides. in general, who is there who really supports whom Europe (maybe individual states), the United States, the Arab countries. interesting.

[cost]

Without military and diplomatic assistance from Western countries, the Government of National Salvation under the leadership of Faiz Saraj will not last for several months, Haftar’s troops have already taken Tripoli international airport and a number of areas of the capital. It is no coincidence that Great Britain has already convened an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council.
According to some reports, Saraj and his government have already fled to Tunisia, but whether Khalifa Haftar will become the new ruler of Libya will be decided not on the battlefield, but at the negotiating table with the participation of Russia, the USA, the EU, and Arab countries.

[Dude]

From the EU, Italy and France, mainly? And so, I would definitely mention Turkey.

[Chaldon48]

In general, the fight is on and we need to see how it ends.

[bessmertniy]

Time works on Haftara. Libya today should be governed by a strong personality, and not a puppet government, losing public support.

[Fraracol_2]

It’s against whom time plays, so against Haftar, with his 76 years and serious illnesses.

[PalBor]

Where does the strong personality come from? The last one in 2011 was vilely killed. As a symbol of united Libya, his son is nominated, but he will still depend on Haftar, and therefore on external players.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Rich

According to some reports, Saraj and his government have already fled to Tunisia, but whether Khalifa Haftar will become the new ruler of Libya will be decided not on the battlefield, but at the negotiating table with the participation of Russia, the USA, the EU, and Arab countries.

A little earlier, Haftar made a statement that he does not consider himself as the president of Libya and will not participate in the elections. It is believed that Haftar could support one of Gaddafi’s children, son Seif or daughter Aisha.

[72jora72]

It is believed that Haftar could support one of Gaddafi’s children, son Seif or daughter Aisha.

There was information that Haftar was negotiating with the Gaddafi clan.

[Doliva63]

Quote: 72jora72

It is believed that Haftar could support one of Gaddafi’s children, son Seif or daughter Aisha.

There was information that Haftar was negotiating with the Gaddafi clan.

Well, that would be fair - there will be a chance to "gather together" everyone who mocked the colonel.

[akims]

Yeah, forgot to ask another Ukraine

[KCA]

Haftar flew to Moscow more than once, they’ll figure it out, those who need to figure it out

[Starper-xnumx]

Quote: KCA

Haftar flew to Moscow more than once, they’ll figure it out, those who need to figure it out

In Soviet times, I remember Brezhnev kissing all the Africans and didn’t refuse anything to them .. Now it’s already a different time and just like that nobody will be invited to the Kremlin ...
Libya is the second strategic region. After Syria for Russia

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Starper-777

Brezhnev kissed all the Africans and didn’t refuse them anything

When Brezhnev died, my dad said: "Ilyich was a fine fellow! Who will condemn him?"

[Starper-xnumx]

Quote: mordvin xnumx

Quote: Starper-777

Brezhnev kissed all the Africans and didn’t refuse them anything

When Brezhnev died, my dad said: "Ilyich was a fine fellow! Who will condemn him?"

When Ilyich was younger then the USSR blossomed .. The demography went off scale, construction went on throughout the USSR, although in the 90s they were all put into the furnace of "crap" .. They called us red-brown names and in every possible way humiliated us
Someone survived yet and I am one of them And now the bastards are poisoning .. And I'm still alive!

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Starper-777

When Ilyich was younger then the USSR flourished.

I do not agree! He only slowed down Khrushchev ....

[Starper-xnumx]

Quote: mordvin xnumx

Quote: Starper-777

When Ilyich was younger then the USSR flourished.

I do not agree! He only slowed down Khrushchev ....

I mean Brezhnev's "stagnation" It was quiet and the people were calm, although the fifth column bred and even screamed from psychiatric hospitals heh
And in the 80s at the end, they were all released and started ..

[Mordvin 3]

In my opinion, Brezhnev was well done.

[Starper-xnumx]

Quote: mordvin xnumx

In my opinion, Brezhnev was well done.

The only period we had was calm and purposeful!
And then the Jews, smugglers and others raised their heads and started .. Download began cashless from enterprises by screwing computers to them under 50 thousand hehe
And then collateral auctions began and EBN began to dance 747 ..
That's how the men live from s / n to retirement .. Which is already far away again ..
Pickaxes and shovels again we take and in mines etc.
And these are like this .. My "favorite video" heh heh

[Mordvin 3]

No, I respect Vysotsky too, however ....:

[Doliva63]

Quote: mordvin xnumx

Quote: Starper-777

When Ilyich was younger then the USSR flourished.

I do not agree! He only slowed down Khrushchev ....

He slowed down Khrushchev, but the country did not set any development.

[Victor_B]

Quote: rufaqn

Is the Havtor army the right "barmaley" or not?

Yes, these are barmalei who need barmalei!
Right!
Suitable!

[Vladimir61]

Quote: rufaqn

Havtor's army is the right "barmaley" or not? How to make out them there?

So just do not understand who is who! Sarajah, recognized by the UN and the West ...
The figure of Haftar is rather interesting.
In 1977-1978 He graduated from the higher officer courses "Shot", and in 1983 he was a student of courses at the MV Frunze Academy, knows Russian.
Former ally of Gaddafi. After the events in Chad, where he was defeated as the commander-in-chief of the Libyan forces, he was captured and joined the opposition to Gaddafi, after the latter renounced the prisoners.
In the 90s he received US citizenship, where he lived for twenty years.

[smart ass]

I don’t understand who to root for?

[Krasnodar]

For world peace

[maiman61]

It is not difficult to determine. France and Italy, with the support of the United States, have supplied their puppet PNS. And for Havtor (LNS) everyone who does not like the fact that "democratic" countries put them in charge.

[Vladimir61]

Quote: Clever man

I don’t understand who to root for?

To root for "everyone", health is not enough. Already "sick", in the times of the USSR, - for "everyone", they themselves were left without pants!

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Clever man

I don’t understand who to root for?

For CSKA

[Valery Valery]

Everything there is corrupt ...

[knn54]

USA UNIVERSALLY supports Chaos.

[rufaqn]

These are slogans of propagandists, the United States and other major players in different regions have different interests, and different ways to achieve them, with such a primitive conclusion as you can blame Russia for maintaining chaos in Syria and Ukraine, unlike Moldova and Georgia where the war ended in a matter of days and there they no longer shoot from the word at all.

[knn54]

Novice and Co.
I'll try to explain. Let's start with the Yeltsin shelling of Parliament. The Yankees did not bet on Yeltsin, exactly ka and on the Duma. They needed a civil war in Russia, and to start the Maidan ..
Now Ukraine, Georgia. The presidents are different and that. The policy is pro-American, the rallies of the opposition are ALSO pro-American. In essence, they do not provide opportunities for a quiet life.
In Syria, the Russian Federation protects the LAWFUL elected President.
So the United States needs chaos in order to look like "a kind of island of tranquility." Ideally, they need a global war, but times are different.
And finally, sanctions also do not contribute to calm, especially after they are financed from the military budget.
Look for primitivism elsewhere, closer to yourself.

[rufaqn]

Let's start with the fact that there was no "thought" until December 12, 1993, the United States, supported Yeltsin even by the fact that they did not oppose him, but the rest of your statements can be considered your opinion, no more, for example, I don't know. what exactly do the ruling circles of the United States want, and you are confident, can you communicate with Vanga or with Nastrodamus?

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: rufaqn

you confidence can communicate with Vanga or with Nastrodamus?

We dreamed of this:

[maidan.izrailovich]

.... are they the correct "barmaley" or not? how to disassemble them there? ...

Some cut off the head from the torso, while others torso from the head.
Otherwise, all barmalei are the same.

[svp67]

Quote: rufaqn

are they correct "barmaley" or not?

But who can sort them out, today he is "correct", and tomorrow ... not to mention the day after tomorrow. But this general came to Moscow, tried to agree on something ...

[awdrgy]

These are the right "barmaley" They have little strength, therefore, it will turn out in the "best case" Afghanistan (the wrong ones have already begun to fuss) in the worst, various options for complete colonial dependence

[g1v2]

For Sarajah - Italy, Turkey and Qatar. Over Haftar UAE, France, Egypt and Israel. Well, we are in full, but not officially, so as not to quarrel with the Turks. Turks and emirates fight against each other almost openly - there are military specialists and equipment and units. Italy and France by special forces. Intelligence and drones. Qatar and the Saudis - in money. We help Haftar with the repair of equipment, we sell to his allies the weapons that they supply him. All practical drones he knocks down with our shells sold to the emirates. Plus, Saraj says that our privateers are fighting on the side of Haftar, but there is no normal evidence so far.

[rufaqn]

Your answer is the most complete

[Oquzyurd]

"For Haftar United Arab Emirates, France ..." Then why did the French company Total recently concluded an agreement with Saraj on hydrocarbon production in Libya?

[g1v2]

Because the government of Saraj is considered the official government of Libya, recognized by the UN. So to legally trade Libyan oil Total agreed with them. Only there is one BUT. All oil, its production and almost all terminals are controlled by Haftar. Without him, Total will not take anything out of Libya anywhere. PM Total will have to negotiate with both.

[Thrifty]

It is necessary to support those who swear on their own head that they will later call either a new city in Libya or an old one that will be renamed Gaddafi, and publicly the remains of Muammar Gaddafi will be reburied! There was one person who gave a lot to the people, and they killed him so meanly!

[Plantagenet]

"The Revolution has a beginning,
The Revolution has no end! "

[Andrey Sukharev]

Quote: Plantagenet

"The Revolution has a beginning,
The Revolution has no end! "

Zradoperemoga forever!

[faterdom]

Well. Good luck to anyone who can shoot down Turkish drones and beat the pro-Western amorphous government of national accord. There is no question - the worse they feel, the better for us.

[Starper-xnumx]

But we still take up Libya .. Syria is BV and Israel next to it ..
And Libya is Europe opa he he

[Shahno]

Quote: knn54

Novice and Co.
I'll try to explain. Let's start with the Yeltsin shelling of Parliament. The Yankees did not bet on Yeltsin, exactly ka and on the Duma. They needed a civil war in Russia, and to start the Maidan ..
Now Ukraine, Georgia. The presidents are different and that. The policy is pro-American, the rallies of the opposition are ALSO pro-American. In essence, they do not provide opportunities for a quiet life.
In Syria, the Russian Federation protects the LAWFUL elected President.
So the United States needs chaos in order to look like "a kind of island of tranquility." Ideally, they need a global war, but times are different.
And finally, sanctions also do not contribute to calm, especially after they are financed from the military budget.
Look for primitivism elsewhere, closer to yourself.

// In Syria, the Russian Federation protects the LAWFUL President-elect //
So it is so. But if we take the emotions out of the brackets, what is the difference between a “pro-American” president - “pro-American policy” (as a consequence of economic, and perhaps political dependence on Western institutions) and “pro-Alavite” president (as a result of the collapse of the economy, the army, the riot war). Neither one nor the other reflects the opinion of all sectors of society (that is, the nation).

[Geo⁣]

Quote: Shahno

"pro-Alawite" president (as a result, the collapse of the economy, army, rampant Islamists, civil war

Yeah, with Gaddafi it was - sheer devastation and all with an outstretched hand. And how did the Yankees come from the Europeans - all of them got rich at once!

[olimpiada15]

Shahno: "neither one nor the other reflect the views of all walks of life."
The fact is that there is no point of view that could reflect the opinion of all strata of society at the same time, if only because there are always contradictions in society. At least, there are those who feel good only when the other is bad, then the principle “I don’t care that I stand on the throat of others, the main thing is that I feel good,” and the most common “give me what my neighbor has, because I'm not worse and I don't care that I don't need it. " This applies to any state from Libya to the USSR. I remember a report from Libya, when the rebels explained that Gaddafi lives in luxury, and they get a pittance, not thinking at all that the citizens of the country have conditions for life, and the absence of a golden toilet does not affect the quality of life. Those. elementary greed ruined quite a prosperous country, which was Libya. Result, there is no Gaddafi and his luxury, but a person's life in the country is not worth a penny. Unfortunately, quite prosperous countries are ruined by envy, greed and stupidity of the majority.

[nobody111body]

under Gaddafi there was order, and therefore it was not profitable for a handful of American Jews-it was not profitable to rob oil in troubled water-having provoked chaos in Libya loudly called by them a "civil war", the Jews, with their billions, were able to get hold of the oil wells and start robbery-naturally through 3 hands- the main wealth of oil; it is not for nothing that during the torture and murder of the legitimate president of Libya, Gaddafi, a certain "lady" named Hillary Clinton laughed at his death; and who is "supervised" by Clinton? ashpen the Jewish diaspora of America, well, it is also a political marionette in the hands of Jews