Undergoing modernization and repair, "Marshal Shaposhnikov" removed from the dry dock

37
Undergoing modernization and repair, "Marshal Shaposhnikov" removed from the dry dock

Undergoing repairs and modernization, the former large anti-submarine ship, retrained to the frigate "Marshal Shaposhnikov", was taken out of the dry dock and moved to the outbuilding pier of the Dalzavod Ship Repair Center in Vladivostok. This was reported by the press service of the Pacific Fleet.

According to the report, the ship will continue preparations for the first launch at sea for testing the main power plant. To date, "Marshal Shaposhnikov" has already undergone dock repair, as part of the modernization, more than 20% of new add-ons have been dismantled and installed on it, and places have been prepared for the installation of new weapons.

The upgraded ship received a missile strike complex weapons

- the message says, without specifying which complex is installed on the ship.



As previously reported, the Marshal Shaposhnikov BPC was retrained as a frigate during modernization. The upgraded version of the ship should receive the Uranian anti-ship complex with X-35 missiles, universal launchers for the Caliber, Onyx or Zircon cruise missiles, the Bagira universal ship’s artillery fire control system, and the TK- electronic suppression system 25.

What will remain of the armament that previously stood on the ship is not known. Previously, the armament included: two 100-mm gun mounts AK-100, two 45-mm semi-automatic guns 21-KM, four 30-mm ZAK AK-630, two air defense systems "Dagger", two anti-submarine complex "Root-bell", two RBU-6000 rocket launchers, as well as torpedo tubes. On board the BOD, two Ka-27PL helicopters were based.

The total displacement of the ships of the 1155 project is 7570 tons, the hull length is 163,5 meters. Speed ​​- up to 32 nodes, cruising range - 5 thousand miles on 18 nodes, autonomy - 30 days. Crew - 220 people (including 29 officers).

According to the plans of the Ministry of Defense, Marshal Shaposhnikov should return to the Pacific Fleet as early as 2020.
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +27
    13 November 2019 10: 38
    the frigate "Marshal Shaposhnikov" underwent modernization in the dry dock, which was inherited from the Russian Empire. On October 7, 1897, the grand opening of the built dry dock in Vladivostok, named after Tsarevich Nikolai, took place.
    1. +3
      13 November 2019 10: 45
      That empire ..
      And now:
      Gazprom's Marshal Vasilevsky floating regasification terminal will operate as a gas carrier to deliver American LNG to Europe. It was originally used as part of an alternative gas supply route to Kaliningrad. The vessel was hired by an international energy trader. reports that the end point of the route will be the largest US LNG terminal located in the Gulf of Mexico.
      1. +10
        13 November 2019 10: 55
        For a long time "Dalzavod" did not fulfill such serious orders. There will be new ones, maybe better. Previously, it employed about 20 people, and today - just a few thousand.
        1. +3
          13 November 2019 11: 47
          bessmertniy (Victor) Today, 10: 55
          +1
          For a long time "Dalzavod" did not fulfill such serious orders. There will be new ones, maybe better. Previously, it employed about 20 people, and today - barely a few thousand

          Yes. There was once a factory! Yes
        2. -8
          13 November 2019 12: 16
          Of course .. it’s not serious to carry your gas .. It’s the matter when the ships built by hands and with the money of our citizens carry American gas, not anyhow.
          Although, our Yamal / Novatek has long been far from ours ..
          In general, everything is for the good of the state .. but of a stranger ..
          1. 0
            13 November 2019 15: 12
            Quote: Roman070280
            Of course .. it’s not serious to carry your gas .. It’s the matter when the ships built by hands and with the money of our citizens carry American gas, not anyhow.
            Although, our Yamal / Novatek has long been far from ours ..
            In general, everything is for the good of the state .. but of a stranger ..

            our fleet of tankers under the USSR, there were about 1200 or more (I can be a little mistaken), they carried out 53% of the oil transportation, now 91 tankers and 3% of the transportation. So, the president’s friends, effective managers, even under EBN, and then under Putin sold what, in theory, they later needed to transport the oil they honestly stolen, but nature took its toll, it was necessary quickly and immediately. The sale itself is half the trouble, imagine how many sales markets were lost beyond the reach of the pipe. These craftsmen are still with their feeders, carefully guarded by the president and the government (by the way, fuel has risen in price again). Moreover, in addition to the complete unwillingness to restore the economic situation, we are losing international recognition and respect, it doesn’t hurt to realize this, but no one (from serious countries) is already considered with us, we have already gone down to the point that we are jealous of how and who shook hands, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs only regrets, in general, you can continue for a long time. This is all Putin’s era, EBN just didn’t manage to ruin and sell so many things, but grew a worthy and grateful shift

            This is my commentary more than a year ago, and almost literally quoted from Vesti FM
          2. +7
            13 November 2019 15: 47
            Quote: Roman070280
            Of course .. it’s not serious to carry your gas ...

            And if "Marshal Vasilevsky" was carrying Russian gas, then moans would immediately begin about the sale of the people's energy resources by the anti-popular government.
            In short, any bast in a row - whatever the government does, it will still be to blame.
            Quote: Roman070280
            Whether business when hand-built ships and for money our citizens, carry not anyhow whose, but American gas ..

            And how long has South Korea become part of Russia? wink
            Or you don't know. that the Hyundai Heavy Industries plant in Ulsan won the Gazprom tender for the construction of a PSGU for Kaliningrad (the future Marshal Vasilevsky)?
            1. 0
              14 November 2019 09: 24
              And if "Marshal Vasilevsky" was carrying Russian gas, then moans would immediately begin about the sale of the people's energy resources by the anti-popular government.


              And you think .. Of course, the "groans" would begin .. For it is on business !!
              It just makes a difference - when it’s not so bad, or when it’s even worse ..
              For example, when we are building the Power of Siberia and pumping our gas to the Chinese - this is considered a bad fact for many .. But if we later handed this finished pipe to the Chinese, and they "unrolled" it, they would start pumping gas from somewhere in Asia. ... this one seems to be a little different already .. And you, for sure, though pretended, but still perfectly understood the difference ..
              In short, any bast in a row - whatever the government does, it will still be to blame.
              Yes, no, what really is there .. a great new one, right ??
              When the Americans buy our LNG for ourselves, we chuckle at them .. what are we, they say, cool .. But we don’t want to see the reverse situation ..

              Or you don't know. that the Hyundai Heavy Industries plant in Ulsan won the Gazprom tender for the construction of a PSGU for Kaliningrad (the future Marshal Vasilevsky)?


              I was not aware that Hyundai built this tanker for its money .. But since you smile so joyfully, apparently it was so ..
              Otherwise, the question of jobs / salaries during construction would also pop up ..))
          3. +2
            14 November 2019 00: 51
            Quote: Roman070280
            all for the good of the state .. but a stranger ..

            laughing laughing laughing Damn it, the main thing is not to slip, because the amount of moisture
            just scales. wassat
          4. 0
            14 November 2019 16: 52
            And our Nenash is in whose terms? Yamal LNG is built on private money, but a controlling stake in the Russian company.
            1. -1
              15 November 2019 10: 05
              We are not adding a controlling stake to the soup ..
              But the fact that half of all income goes to someone’s pocket over a hill - it even affects the cost of our borsch set.
              1. -1
                15 November 2019 13: 58
                Someone’s incomes are not at all related to your borsch set, which depends only on the budget and, accordingly, on taxes. And Yamal LNG regularly pays taxes to the budget of the Russian Federation.
                1. -1
                  15 November 2019 14: 04
                  Sit down, two !!
                  Someone doesn’t have it. It’s after they became someone else’s .. And they ceased to be the incomes of our country .. What I wrote about !!
                  We can sell the second part of Yamal / Novatek to the West .. and then you will declare that this enterprise has nothing to do with our borsch set.
                  1. -1
                    18 November 2019 14: 12
                    The professional dependent’s thoughts are the incomes of our country, my borsch set, to sell to the West, a boobube ... first, take an interest in how and by what the federal budget is formed, you will begin to better understand where your borsch set comes from, what influences it and what doesn’t. And then take the trouble to understand the basic principles of the functioning of the modern economy, especially in matters of corporate ownership, management and investment ...
                    1. 0
                      18 November 2019 14: 21
                      Well, yes .. arguments from the series "take the trouble to figure it out" and "myself"
                      Judging by the fact that the dependents for you are precisely those who work, and corporations were born to make a profit - it is clear how you "figured it out" ..))
                      I gave real and concrete examples, but nothing more intelligible came from you except the bubub ..
                      Although it was clear even after the phrase "corporation_revenues_ have nothing to do with your borscht recruitment at all"
                      1. 0
                        19 November 2019 14: 58
                        Well, yes, solid examples, real and concrete, nowhere else to go)) See for yourself, the federal budget is replenished by 45% from the oil and gas sector, 9 out of 19,5 trillion rubles, these are direct taxes and duties. At the same time, from the remaining non-oil and gas budget revenues, from half to two-thirds are also functionally related to the fuel and energy complex (VAT and so on), in other words, oil and gas attendants come in and support the rest of the economy. That is, this is your notorious borsch set. We look further, there are private companies in the fuel and energy sector, they are subordinate to our jurisdiction and regularly pay taxes due to our budget. What else do you need from them? How private business manages profits is his own business, otherwise private business does not make any sense, the main thing for us is to receive taxes. Or do you want all companies to be state owned? Or do you think all the money from Gazprom goes into your borsch set? Whatever the case, this is not to mention the well-known effectiveness of state-owned companies.
                      2. 0
                        20 November 2019 13: 29
                        grandmas from oil and gas come and support the rest of the economy. That is, this is your notorious borsch set.


                        You see .. but initially you argued that this money has nothing to do with the price of borscht .. Well, better late than never ..))

                        Now let's move on ..

                        45% is replenished by the oil and gas sector, 9 out of 19,5 trillion rubles, these are direct taxes and duties.

                        a controlling stake in a Russian company.

                        do not add a controlling packet to the soup ..
                        But the fact that half of all income goes to someone’s pocket over a hill - it even affects the cost of our borsch set.
                        Here is what was incomprehensible ??))

                        If I have a factory across the road .. I pay a million taxes per year ..
                        Leaving himself a controlling stake, and transferring / selling / presenting the rest, etc. (we won’t go deeply) into private / any hands to the spherical Gerhard Schroeder .. next year I will pay to the treasury neither more nor less than half a million .. After that, the teacher’s pension / salary will increase or decrease ?? For some reason, you have argued that this does NOT affect it at all .. on anyone ..

                        There is a simple law of conservation of energy .. And, although I am not an economist, money also does not disappear without a trace, and does not appear .. If someone is over the hill, call him an investor, or whatever (the essence does not change from the name), extracts profit to my pocket .. for a minute - from OUR natural resources .. in the amount of as much as 1/2 part .. I just can't "believe" that at the same time I don't pay personally for all this with my standard of living ..
        3. +1
          13 November 2019 16: 52
          Cool, well, Super Gorshkov is ready with small forces, there would be more such good news ... good
    2. 0
      13 November 2019 11: 01
      It seems to me, or will there be 3 launchers of 8 missiles on it?
    3. +5
      13 November 2019 11: 16
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      frigate "Marshal Shaposhnikov" was modernized

      The total displacement of the ships of the 1155 project is 7570 tons. Arly Burke from 6600 to 9600 tons. The recessed frigate Ingstad has a displacement of 5290 tons. So that Shaposhnikov is quite up to the destroyer. They were modest.
      1. +3
        13 November 2019 11: 52
        Quote: hrych
        The total displacement of the ships of the 1155 project is 7570 tons. Arly Burke from 6600 to 9600 tons. The recessed frigate Ingstad has a displacement of 5290 tons. So that Shaposhnikov is quite up to the destroyer. They were modest.

        The name of the frigate "Marshal Shaposhnikov" is the result of the official reclassification, caused primarily by the significantly expanded composition of the weapons of the former BOD as a result of the modernization. At one time, the project of the newest large anti-submarine ship was just as officially received the index 1155 and the code "Fregat". The lower limit of the total displacement of frigates of modern and promising projects lies at the level of 6000 tons (Spanish "Basans", French "Aquitania") and is not going to stop at this mark - the Italian "Bergaminis" (formally also FREMM) weigh 6700 tons, and the German F125 " Baden-Württemberg "- 7100 tons. Thus, foreign frigates clearly" breathe in the back of the head "BOD pr. 1155.
      2. +2
        13 November 2019 17: 34
        It's not about classification, even call it a corvette. The main thing is that the combat capability was to the maximum and more of them. How many of them are left "on the move" now - 5 or 6?
        1. +4
          13 November 2019 20: 25
          The frigate differs from the destroyer in displacement, although there is an overlap. We have 10 BODs in service, Shaposhnikov's analogs of project 1155 in the presence of 8 units (1 in reserve). There is Chabanenko (1155.1), which is 9000 tons and, like Berki, has a Mosquito launcher in displacement, already has a TA 533 and a missile-torpedo launcher Waterfall, where Caliber climbs. There is one more in the ranks "Sharp-witted", it is smaller - 4500 tons. In general, these are far-field ships and re-equipment into missile attack ships, as stated, will immediately give us a dozen ferry destroyers. This is a tangible amount and does not cost much.
          1. +1
            13 November 2019 20: 34
            I do not mean the figures at the headquarters, but the real ships, ready to go to sea tomorrow. Etc. 1155 "on the go" pieces five - six.
            1. +3
              13 November 2019 20: 43
              Quote: TermNachTER
              Etc. 1155 "on the go" pieces five - six

              All of them are on track and in service, except for one in reserve and Shaposhnikov. If they begin to convert them, like Shaposhnikov, then of course they will get up to the joke. However, even now they are not extras, the TA 533 pair are ready to work with Caliber and the Rockete missile and torpedoes are very decent weapons ...
    4. +6
      13 November 2019 11: 42
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      in the dry dock, which was inherited from the Russian Empire. On October 7 of 1897, the grand opening of the constructed dry dock in Vladivostok took place

      A unique building! It's good that it has been preserved until now. But Kronstadt was not lucky. Petrovsky dock. A stunning post-apocalyptic landscape! A grandiose engineering structure 384 meters long, 34 meters wide and 10 meters deep, completely overgrown with trees and bushes. The dock looks like a set for a doomsday movie. But besides it, there are 4 more dry docks. Doc them. P.I. Veleshinsky is the largest dry dock at the Kronstadt Marine Plant. The oldest is the dock of Peter the Great, built according to the project of the first emperor of Russia in 1719-1752, dock named after I. M.A. Surgin, built in 1830-1846. Emperor Nicholas I, dock "In memory of 3 destroyers", built under Emperor Alexander II in 1860-1876. and doc them. F.V. Mitrofanov, begun under Emperor Alexander III and completed under his son Nicholas II. With the exception of the dock of Peter the Great, which is transferred to the city for museum and cultural purposes, all other docks are operational. Thus, the Kronstadt Marine Plant has the largest collection of dry docks in the country.
    5. +8
      13 November 2019 11: 45
      Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
      the frigate "Marshal Shaposhnikov" underwent modernization in the dry dock, which was inherited from the Russian Empire.

      Well, I must say thanks to the king, took care of the descendants
  2. +4
    13 November 2019 10: 41
    Good news, still to find out what will be removed, put. I think one art 100 and semiautomatic devices will be removed, the bell and RBU will be removed as well, they will stick it in, maybe the dagger will be replaced, although maybe I'm wrong
    1. +17
      13 November 2019 10: 49
      Recall that they plan to deliver (according to public procurement):
      3P-14H-1155 1
      3C-14-1155 2
      3P-60Y 1
      3С-24 "Uranus" 2
      MP-123-02 / 3 Bagira 1
      MP-710 1
      5П-30Н2 «Фрегат-МА4К» 1
      5P-30P “Floodplain-M1” 1
      P-779-28 1
      TK-25-2 1
      The number of missiles is doubled, the firing range at a surface target is increased threefold, and it becomes possible to fire at ground targets from a long distance (which was never the case before). After the upgrade, there will be 2 Caliber and 3 Uranium. Already the entire superstructure under the 16nd turret of the main ship was cut to the upper deck under the bridge. Instead, a podium was mounted under the modules of universal UVP missiles of the Caliber family. My opinion is that UKSK will be used only for KR and newest PLUR. The BOD of Project 8 has an inherent disadvantage - the maximum firing range of the PLUR exceeds the detection range of the GAS. To realize all the capabilities of the PLUR, it is necessary to use the Ka-2PL anti-submarine helicopter, which itself carries anti-submarine torpedoes and can sink the detected enemy submarine on its own, without using the PLUR with the BOD. By the way, the old SAM "Dagger" with a range of 1155 km remains on the ship. By the way, at the Marshal Shaposhnikov BPK, almost a quarter of the hull was digested due to corrosion. Not to mention the cable routes, which changed everything.
      1. +1
        13 November 2019 11: 18
        In terms of work at a cost of more than half the ship. Looking at how many years his life was prolonged. If 15 years, then justified.
      2. +1
        13 November 2019 11: 20
        It’s good that the repair does not depend on the gas turbine, otherwise we have strained with the dvigunami
      3. 0
        13 November 2019 13: 49
        Huck also changed as far as I remember. There were rumors about OCD for the modernization of the dagger.
  3. +4
    13 November 2019 10: 47
    The good news, let's hope that there will be no shifts in the right of acceptance hi
  4. 0
    13 November 2019 13: 52
    scare the timing of modernization ..
    1. 0
      13 November 2019 13: 59
      Scare For 3 years he stood in the dock. And now let's remember how long a simple VTG of the undaunted lasts.
      1. 0
        13 November 2019 14: 10
        So count 3 years in the dock and at least a year for all tests .. 4 years ..
        1. 0
          13 November 2019 20: 55
          For our Navy, this is fast. Moreover, the whole ship was shoveled. Upgrading the following will go faster