The fate of the Khmeimim air base and the Navy base in Tartus

65

The war in Syria is over ...


A little more than two weeks have passed since the moment when the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated that the war in Syria is over, despite the fact that there are hotbeds of tension on the territory of the country. Especially in places controlled by coalition forces.





We quote the words of Sergei Lavrov from his interview with the newspaper Trud:
"The country is gradually returning to a normal, peaceful life. Separate hotbeds of tension persist only in territories not controlled by the government of the SAR, such as Idlib and the eastern bank of the Euphrates."


It is clear that now there will be no active military operations with the participation of Russian troops. Moreover, it is clear that the presence of Russian specialists of certain specialties will continue there. This is not discussed. In some matters, especially with the balance of power that exists today in Syria, this is simply necessary for both us and the Syrians.

We are much more interested in another piece of the interview of the Russian minister. Just a couple of proposals that for most ordinary people did not say anything, but for more knowledgeable people have become that beacon in the future, the direction where Syria will move in the coming years or decades.

"On the whole, Russia is in favor of restoring sovereign, territorially integral Syria, overcoming the consequences of rampant terrorism as soon as possible, returning all Syrians to their homeland, and the country itself to the" Arab family ", which will guarantee the security and stability in the Middle East."


We will not discuss foreign policy issues today. For the appearance of a headache among diplomats and politicians of some countries, I think the last quote is enough. But how Russia will contribute to the solution of the questions stated by the Foreign Minister directly concerns, including, the Russian military.

Tartus Naval Base


In order not to intrigue readers, I will start with the main thing. The Russian Federation on an ongoing basis has a full aviation military base in the region. In addition, the Russian Navy retained, or rather, recreated, on the basis of a small previously existing base, practically not used for its intended purpose, a fully-fledged modern naval base in Tartus.

It is very difficult to say which base is more important. Without Khmeimim’s base, there wouldn’t be a new Navy base in Tartus. But at the same time, without Tartus, there would be no Hmeimim. There would be no victories of the Syrian army. Although no, there would have been victories in the end, but the price of these victories would have been an order of magnitude higher. Yes, and Russian troops would have been much more difficult to work in Syria.

Remember, when the armed conflict in Syria in 2011 began, Russia did not interfere in the internal affairs of this country. Even the appearance of ISIS (banned in the Russian Federation) did not prompt Moscow to take action. This continued until August 2015, when Syrian President Bashar al-Assad turned to Russia with a request to help in the fight against international terrorism. And the first blow to the Russian Aerospace Forces was delivered on the terrorists of September 30 of 2015 of the year.

Why are Khmeimim and Tartus closely related? Again you need to return to the 2015 year. Khmeimim, which was provided by our air forces as a military base, was an almost clean field with one lane, an old airport and military equipment unsuitable for the needs. There was practically nothing for the placement and operation of the Russian VKS. And a civil airfield was necessary for the republic.

A Russian soldier can quickly equip himself with a comfortable life in war. Perhaps this is genetically embedded in our military personnel. However, the command of the Air Forces and the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation even then began to prepare a base for the future. And then the Navy base was needed. Capital construction required a huge amount of building materials from Russia. And it was optimal to import them by sea.

By the way, modern weapons, which so frightened the forces wishing to overthrow the Syrian president, were delivered mainly by sea. Through the base in Tartus. Although during the operation, according to media reports, it might have seemed that the supply was mainly by aviation through Khmeimim.

The Navy base in Tartus today and what was before the start of the VKS operation differs in both heaven and earth. Instead of a berth, a barracks and several warehouses in the far corner of the port, today the base is a closed water area with the latest moorings.

Moreover, this is no longer the base for one or two ships, today a squadron can enter the water area! The berths are equipped with ship life support systems, unloading platforms, and a repair complex for the maintenance and minor repair of ships.

Here it is simply necessary to mention the rest of the crews of ships and submarines. Tartus has the full infrastructure for organizing such a holiday. Now soldiers, sailors and officers live in comfortable conditions and have all the opportunities that they had in their "native" garrisons. From laundry services to movies and cafes.

It is also very important that the base in Tartus is focused not only on Syria, but also on the control of the Mediterranean Sea. Ships and submarines, which are today in the base area, are capable of striking targets located even in the Bosphorus and Dardanelles. In fact, Russia took control of the entire eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea.

But that is not all. The base itself is perfectly protected from attack from all sides. Air defense in Tartus has the ability to destroy targets both at a great distance, and in the immediate vicinity of the base itself. Russian air defense systems pinpoint targets at ranges up to 400 kilometers. Yes, and electronic warfare systems located in Tartus, perfectly cover the approaches to the base.

No less seriously is the naval base protected from the sea. Bastion missile systems, cruise missiles on ships and submarines, coast guard boats and anti-sabotage boats, naval special forces units - all this provides reliable protection for Tartus and the destruction of the enemy both at long and near approaches to the base.

Air Base Khmeimim



Today, the Khmeimim airbase is not just the home base of the Russian aerospace forces. In fact, it is a small Russian city located far from the homeland. Yes, yes, not a tent city, but quite modern, moderately comfortable town. True, civilians arriving at the base on a business trip are a little uncomfortable with the fact that the architecture of the base is quite monotonous.

The basis of residential construction on the basis of many well-known KIMBs. Ready-made residential "bricks" for any construction. The famous "engineering modular block design", and simply 6-meter "sea container" (6,5 m on 2,5 m), equipped with air conditioning, soundproofing, sleeping places and various lockers, bedside tables.

It is clear that young people need other common areas: canteens, a club, sports grounds ... At the airbase, all this is! There is even a bathhouse! Not to mention its own bakery and laundry. And there are two temples built by the hands of soldiers and officers. In general, we can say that today the air base is completely built, and now the task of the military is to improve living and service conditions.

Here is what the deputy commander of an aviation regiment based on the Khmeimim base said on 26 on September:
"The reconstruction of the airfield continues, the infrastructure of the entire air base is developing, including housing and cultural and leisure conditions."


The creation of an air base today can be called without a stretch the heroism of the soldiers and officers of the Russian Armed Forces. The base was unfolding in the conditions of warfare, in severe climatic conditions, when in summer the temperature jumped to 50 degrees. At the same time, the main work of the base to provide the air forces and other units and subunits of the army with everything necessary for conducting military operations continued without interruptions.

The base, as expected, is perfectly protected. Today we can say that Khmeimim is “covered” by a dome with a diameter of 400 kilometers, which guarantees the destruction of the enemy by the “Triumph” C-400. At the near approaches, “Tor M2” and “Carapace M” guard the sky. Add electronic warfare systems to these complexes.

According to the order, any object crossing the 60-kilometer zone and not responding to a request is subject to immediate destruction. It is precisely due to the fact that the commanders of the air defense system received the right to eliminate the target directly that none of the UAV attacks reached their goals. In 2019 alone, the Khmeimim air defense destroyed and landed more than a hundred strike and reconnaissance drones. General Konashenkov on the situation today:
“Our air defense systems have proven in practice that they can [not only] detect targets such as rockets and Dronesbut also effectively destroy them. In addition, they are capable of destroying cruise missiles, and S-400s are also capable of destroying ballistic targets."


Any airbase is primarily an airfield. In order to find out about the state of the airfield, let us turn again to an interview with the deputy commander of the air regiment:
“The first class airfield, which is capable of receiving all types of aircraft, from helicopters to heavy military transport aircraft and missile carriers ... Now the reconstruction of the second runway is being carried out, which will increase its capabilities. New facilities were built in which aircraft were installed. "These structures protect against possible attacks of battle drones, as well as from rain and direct sunlight."


Of course, someone will ask, but what about Putin’s statement on the withdrawal of the Russian air forces, made in December 2017. The main forces in December were indeed withdrawn. But the necessary to protect the base and conduct one-time operations remained. Today at the base in Hmeimim are about 30 aircraft of various types. These are SU-35С, Su-34, Su-24 aircraft, Mi-35 and Mi-8AMTSH helicopters.

And the last one. The Russian air base did not affect the operation of the civil airport. Basil Al-Assad International Airport, better known as Latakia Airport, is actively used today by the Syrian side. Its joint use does not interfere with civilian aircraft.

We will stay long


I specifically spoke in sufficient detail about what our bases in Syria look like today. First of all, in order to make it clear that we have come for a long time. We got a great opportunity not only to keep the region under control, but also to actively monitor the most problematic areas of the Mediterranean.

Both Russian military bases are not autonomous. This is a single system, which in case of danger will provide a quick response to any enemy attack. And the improvement of these bases is ongoing. This means that the Russian army will no longer passively look at what some presumptuous politicians of other countries in the region are doing. This means that we are actively involved in international politics.

And the soldiers and sailors, officers, generals and admirals, who provided the construction and equipment of two military bases in a fairly short time, all that remains is to say thank you for the service.
65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    30 September 2019 05: 42
    In 2019 alone, the Khmeimim air defense destroyed and planted more than a hundred shock and reconnaissance drones.

    Very interesting is the chronology of the fight against these enemy weapons.
    I would like to understand in detail all the details of the conduct of this war in this area.
    It’s very interesting who collects these drones, who writes software, who buys or delivers spare parts for drones, who determines the direction and purpose of strikes ... devices of drones are interesting ... you can write a whole dissertation on this topic ... I hope to get acquainted with it. ..very promising direction in military art.
    1. +6
      30 September 2019 05: 50
      Ships and submarines, which are today in the base area, are capable of striking targets located even in the Bosphorus and Dardanelles.
      Is it for an ally? "We do not mind," may ask. feel
      someone will ask, but what about Putin’s statement on the withdrawal of the Russian air forces from December 2017. The main forces in December were indeed withdrawn.
      Such stupidity can be asked either by a patient or an enemy of Russia and 30 aircraft will not be enough. feel
      to control the region, but also actively monitor the most problematic areas of the Mediterranean.
      1. -3
        30 September 2019 07: 35
        . A little more than two weeks have passed since the moment when the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated that the war in Syria is over

        This time again?

        But what about the integrity of Syria? What about Idlib, territories occupied by Turks and Kurds? Let me remind you that Vladimir Putin announced the restoration of integrity as one of the main political goals of this war. Is the goal fulfilled to declare victory?
        . when the armed conflict in Syria began in 2011, Russia did not intervene in the internal affairs of this country. Even the appearance of ISIS (banned in the Russian Federation) did not prompt Moscow to take action. This continued until August 2015, when Syrian President Bashar Assad turned to Russia asking for help

        They were slandering Syria for several years, until Boshar asked Putin to intervene. Putin came and helped distant Syrians. Interesting. But how should residents of the Russian Donbass be asked to achieve the same thing?
        1. +4
          30 September 2019 09: 34
          Quote: Stas157
          This time again?

          And when else? Do you mean ISIS? Yes, it has been destroyed for a long time and such a state does not exist, but this does not mean that the US irregular army is a gang of formation that changes its name like gloves, but without changing its essence, is completely expelled from Syria. They are completely localized and their days are numbered.
          1. -8
            30 September 2019 10: 12
            Quote: Boris55
            And when else? Do you mean ISIS?

            I wrote what I mean, Boris:
            Quote: Stas157
            One of the main political goals of this war, Vladimir Putin announced the restoration of integrity. Is the goal fulfilled to declare victory?

            That is, the main goal didn’t seem to be in that. Russia got involved in a foreign war with incomprehensible goals, and those goals that were officially announced were not achieved. There were quite a few articles about the military company in Syria, but not a single one gave a reasonable answer. Why do we need this war. Whose interests are we protecting there? What are the goals really achieved? Engage in war only for the sake of a small military base, which, if desired, can be blocked at any time by the NATO bloc - beyond logic.
            1. 0
              30 September 2019 11: 00
              Quote: Stas157
              Why do we need this war. Whose interests are we protecting there?

              Their. Use the source:



              As long as there are interested parties (USA, West) to solve their problems by force, terrorism will not cease to exist.
              1. -2
                30 September 2019 11: 21
                Quote: Boris55
                Use the source

                If you yourself are not able to answer, then do not send me to some videos. Where Putin does not say anything on the topic, except for the notorious fight on distant approaches to terrorists. It’s as if they were not at their neighbors.
                1. +2
                  30 September 2019 12: 21
                  Quote: Stas157
                  If you yourself are not able to answer, then do not send me to some videos

                  Your problem is that you are not interested in the source, you are prettier to retelling what he said. I hope you are able to analyze what we have done in Syria with what they have been told. If we judge the retelling of what was said, then the fantasy has no boundaries and I do not intend to argue with these storytellers. hi
            2. 0
              30 September 2019 11: 15
              and you will begin to separate political goals from the military and that’s all. to start. do you call this another's war? and not someone else’s what?
              1. +2
                30 September 2019 12: 40
                Quote: carstorm 11
                and you start sharing political goals and military and all. to start.

                Here it is. They advise something with a smart look, they slip the videos, but no one can directly answer an elementary question. Well, since you are all already sharedso answer deployed about the goals and objectives of the war in Syria. Why only Syria? Nearby are Iraq, and Yemen, and Libya ... They also wanted Russian aircraft to bomb terrorists. However, Putin said no. Where does such selectivity come from in choosing terrorists on distant approaches? What is it due to?
                Quote: carstorm 11
                do you call this another's war? and not someone else’s what?

                And what about the war in Syria Is this already our war? So tell me, what are your vital interests there? What are we fighting for though ?? Answer. Our war is primarily a conflict in the Donbass, where Bandera kills Russians. Still. And not at all on far approaches.
            3. 0
              3 October 2019 17: 42
              Russia got involved in a foreign war with incomprehensible goals, and those goals that were officially announced

              It is believed that these goals are connected with the interests of the capitalists of the Russian Federation and with oil.
              Once, not a military, but a commercial East India company, accidentally captured the whole of India.
        2. +2
          30 September 2019 12: 11
          Stas157 (Stas) Today, 07:35
          And the main "" "strategist" "is what he said:
          “Russia should not annex Donbass at the present time, even if its residents express such a desire. Its goal is to stabilize the situation in Ukraine.

          Russian political scientist Sergei Karaganov said this on the air of the TVC channel. "

          https://e-news.pro/in-russia/299466-karaganov-rossiya-ne-dolzhna-prisoedinyat-donbass-dazhe-esli-ego-zhiteli-etogo-hotyat.html
        3. 0
          30 September 2019 12: 46
          Putin came and helped distant Syrians. Interesting. But how should residents of the Russian Donbass be asked to achieve the same thing?

          Well, that's only for "Boris" (accent on the first syllable wink ) Putin's task was to "restore the territorial integrity of Syria" because even the stubborn lovers of the HSP are clear that now, under no circumstances, Syria will not be a single state. Yes GDP climbed into Syria not to protect Assad, whom he, by and large, does not care about, but at the request of his ... from Gazprom, in order to prevent the construction of the Qatari gas pipeline through Syria and, in part, in order to stop oil trading ISIS at bargain prices, knocking down the margins of the oil and gas lobby. But, in Donbass there is no oil and gas and the Qataris are not going to lay pipelines through them to Europe, therefore they are not interesting for the Ozero cooperative and even dangerous, because of their places of uncontrollable "behavior" to Swiss and European banks, so that they have long been considered "a suitcase without a handle." Yes
          1. -1
            30 September 2019 14: 40
            Quote: Monster_Fat
            GDP climbed into Syria not to protect Assad, which he, by and large, does not care, but at the request of his ..... from Gazprom

            But this is quite possible, although the top management did not confirm this version (for obvious reasons). And by and large, I have no complaints, if so. If only the war for these Gazprom interests did not put a heavy burden on the shoulders and pensions from the elderly were not taken away.
        4. 0
          3 October 2019 17: 35
          But how should residents of the Russian Donbass be asked to achieve the same thing?

          If you were not a hypocrite, then in geopolitics, life is worthless.
    2. +2
      30 September 2019 07: 15
      A week ago, a press conference was held at the Khmeimim base, at which drones were shown to reporters. Only here there are no direct answers to your questions. Only hints and photos. The mechanics and the drones themselves are quite simple, but the software and guidance systems show that very serious specialists had a hand in them. Just for example, a drone flies at an altitude of about 4000 m and a range of 400 km. while he hits the target! It’s not just working in areas, but striking for a specific goal ...
      1. +1
        30 September 2019 08: 29
        Quote: domokl
        the drones themselves are quite simple, but the software and guidance systems show that very serious specialists had a hand in them. Just for example, a drone flies at an altitude of about 4000 m and a range of 400 km. while he hits the target! Not just working on areas, but beats for a specific purpose ...

        Now in any toy, a quadrocopter for $ 400, there are flight tasks and guidance in gps navigation. If the target is stationary, then nothing is easier - set the coordinates and the drone will fly to the desired point, and if necessary, will return back.
        1. 0
          3 October 2019 18: 00
          any toy, a quadrocopter for $ 400, has flight tasks and guidance in gps navigation.

          It doesn’t work, gps for 400 km is disabled by kraukha.
      2. +1
        30 September 2019 08: 53
        decent toys or home-made school-level toys based on Arduino have long been capable of this
        1. 0
          30 September 2019 12: 16
          the war in Syria is over

          winked
          And here, in March of this year, he says the exact opposite: https://ria.ru/20190403/1552359037.html Yes
          Moreover, here are the expert reviews on his current words: https://ria.ru/20190913/1558659031.html
          That is, they are quite consistent with his "March" statements that "the war in Syria is not over." Yes
          Well:
          In 2019 alone, the Khmeimim air defense destroyed and planted more than a hundred shock and reconnaissance drones.

          And so yes, "there is no war", and this is so, the boys indulge ...
          https://riafan.ru/1213760-siriya-itogi-za-sutki-na-21-sentyabrya-06-00-saa-zachishaet-palmiru-ot-ostatkov-ig-turciya-namerena-postroit-voennye-bazy-na-vostoke-sirii
  2. +3
    30 September 2019 05: 43
    Sergey Lavrov stated that the war in Syria is over, despite the fact that there are hotbeds of tension on the territory of the country.
    It was he who hurried. War can break out at any moment. "There is no stability."
    1. 0
      30 September 2019 07: 18
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      He was in a hurry.

      I do not know. But on 13 of September he said just that. In plain text. soldier And what is happening today is the echoes of war. Smoking bandits from caches bully
      1. +2
        30 September 2019 08: 41
        hi Good day. It seems to me that if we turn to the part of Lavrov’s interview concerning Syria, he meant the end of the civil war. Those. they kind of agreed with the opposition, and now only counter-terrorism work will be conducted. Thus, from the point of view of Russia, all who are currently fighting against the regular army and the government of the SAR are not opposition and they can and should be ironed exactly how terrorists without looking at the squeals from the west.
      2. 0
        30 September 2019 09: 05
        domokl (Alexander)
        I do not know. But on September 13th he said just that. In plain text. soldier And what is happening today is the echoes of war. Smoking bandits from caches bully
        I have no doubt that he said so. Newsreels are nonsense, six months or a year. But on command, if necessary, the dekhans will again turn into militants and bring in new "fighters for the purity of the faith"
  3. 0
    30 September 2019 06: 17
    We will stay long

    Better not tell.
    To the author for the article - Respect!
    1. 0
      3 October 2019 05: 50
      Quote: Valery Valery
      To the author for the article - Respect!

      not good, of course. But it would be very good if an article of this kind would be supported by graphic material - photographs, diagrams, etc.
  4. 0
    30 September 2019 06: 20
    Somehow the content of the article does not match the title. The article is a lot about what has been achieved ... It would probably be even more if the author included an inventory of property and the names of the bases in the article ... But this is only a prerequisite for the further fate of the bases, but they do not reveal the fate. Or were there few completed ready-made projects? The question has stood and continues to remain open and its severity is only growing. How can we make domestic business climb into Syria on favorable terms for it? And until there is an answer to it, all projects on the use of bases in Syria will raise the question of their payback and expediency.
    1. 0
      30 September 2019 13: 48
      Quote: Alex2048
      how do we get domestic business into Syria on favorable terms for it? And until there is an answer to it, all projects on the use of bases in Syria will raise the question of their payback and expediency
      Do not confuse geopolitical projects with trade and economic projects and, moreover, make the former dependent on the latter. The opposite is true. Many songs were sung about the payback and expediency of the center in Lourdes and the base in Camrani.
      1. 0
        30 September 2019 21: 41
        Quote: sniperino
        Do not confuse geopolitical projects

        our domestic political project is not particularly visible, let alone the geopolitical.
        however, our former counterparts from across the ocean also cannot boast of sane geopolitics. this, apparently, is some kind of general crisis of superpower - and the former and the acting, having ceased to seriously confront each other, do not understand what they should do now.
        1. 0
          1 October 2019 10: 10
          Quote: protoss
          our domestic political project is not particularly visible, let alone the geopolitical
          An internal political project does not carry goals in itself: it is needed in order to solve a problem in an inclusive system, i.e. in geopolitics. This is even more obvious when it comes to military bases.
        2. 0
          3 October 2019 18: 03
          however, our former counterparts from overseas also can’t boast of sane geopolitics

          Not true, they have very strong geopolitics.
    2. -3
      30 September 2019 18: 29
      Quote: Alex2048
      will become a question of their payback and feasibility.

      what kind of payback is Syria is a political issue, and tens of billions of dollars to maintain a base from poor Syria ... certainly not about payback.
      Because of this, the Americans withdrew their troops from Iraq, having previously spent a trillion dollars over a dozen years.
      1. 0
        3 October 2019 18: 06
        after spending a trillion dollars in a decade.

        Spending money on the military-industrial complex is wonderful, patches and combat soldiers, new orders, factories, because the money was not burned, but passed through the economy.
  5. 0
    30 September 2019 06: 36
    I hope that our military there have really good living conditions for work and life.
  6. +1
    30 September 2019 06: 40
    For now, for a long time, the situation may remain under siege!
    There, molded "friends" will always be there ...
  7. 0
    30 September 2019 07: 00
    The main thing is that the Russian presence in Syria and the Middle East is always there, so that they don’t speak and do all sorts of hunks who, by the will of fate, reached the media or the stands of the media. But this happens all the time, with an enviable periodicity. Of the latter - Afghanistan and Germany, Cuba, Vietnam ...
    1. +1
      30 September 2019 07: 21
      Everything will depend on us.
      Quote: 1536
      The main thing is that the Russian presence in Syria and the Middle East is always

      As history has shown, we sometimes act like capricious children - "Oh so! Well, you go! ..". And we leave, leaving everything ...
      1. +1
        30 September 2019 09: 09
        You domokl Alexander Staver write
        Everything will depend on us.

        -That's right. Depends on the political will to use force.
        —- Both bases - examples of the “less is better” approach and a high bar for the future. To the author - ++!
        —- Especially - Tartus. The crane complex is impressive, modern gantry and supporting.
        -Health to the military personnel and strategic constancy to this powerful wedge of Russia!
  8. -1
    30 September 2019 08: 16
    Its joint use does not interfere with civilian aircraft.


    What is there joint? Khmeinim is a small town now, but everything is still fenced off from civilians there.

    The lease of the EMNIP territory for 49 years has been negotiated.

    The war is over, only shoot. X)
  9. 0
    30 September 2019 08: 35
    Good review article.
    A lot of information.
    Attempted analysis.
    But "behind the scenes" the main question remains - "are we advancing or are we in the trenches?"
    The presence of strategic facilities outside the country indicates certain aspirations.
    In our memory, there were two bases (except Syria) - a base in Cuba, and a base in Vietnam.
    The first is clearly a combat mission.
    For she provided the Pacific Fleet.
    The second reconnaissance.
    And even the USSR could not afford to have, strictly speaking, a US military base close by (the attempt to deploy missiles almost led to the Third World War).

    Here's what the author will say about what else our officials "said between the lines"?
    Striking the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles is certainly great.
    Only clearly is a suicidal step for these two bases.
    If enemy troops accumulated in the indicated places and prepared to attack the Russian Federation, then there are no bases anymore.
    Maybe all are dumb, but not so much as to leave behind these centers of resistance in their rear!
    Those. it turns out that the bases designed to protect the interests of the Russian Federation themselves need very serious protection.
    I am not a strategist.
    I’m not even a military man (service in the SA doesn’t count).
    But I study politics.
    And it’s not clear to me where this will lead us?
    1. -2
      30 September 2019 09: 07
      In the foreseeable future, it will seem to lead to the fact that these bases will quietly bend themselves from underfunding.
      1. 0
        30 September 2019 09: 15
        As an option!
        But this will happen when the value of the invested assets exceeds the economic (political questionable) effect of the presence of these objects.
        Or maybe it will happen simultaneously.
    2. 0
      30 September 2019 10: 34
      Quote: demo
      Striking the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles is certainly great.
      Only clearly is a suicidal step for these two bases.

      I was also struck by this conclusion.
    3. 0
      3 October 2019 18: 16
      enemy troops accumulated in these places, preparing for a strike on the Russian Federation

      Attacks on the Russian Federation will be only when the 3rd world war begins, and then not just the bases, the ball will come cracks. 3 world will not. Do not worry about the base.
      And it’s not clear to me where this will lead us?

      Fussing not directly, but through puppets, on foreign lands, does not threaten the Russian Federation, everything will be fine. The main thing is that confusion does not happen and then there will be only image losses.
  10. -2
    30 September 2019 10: 37
    I would like to remind you that under the terms of the agreements, our bases, the Syrians can be closed at any time, although the rent is free. So we must constantly ensure the loyalty of the leadership of Syria, and the Arabs are well-known traders.
    1. -2
      30 September 2019 10: 56
      Quote: Stirbjorn
      ... under the terms of the agreements, our bases, the Syrians can close at any time ...

      Very interesting.

      Show the "contract", if you please Yes
      1. -1
        30 September 2019 13: 20
        Kisa, I will not show you anything hi
        1. -4
          30 September 2019 13: 24
          Quote: Stirbjorn
          I will not show you anything

          Yes, even to us, even not to us ... you have nothing to show Yes

          It’s a shame not when you see, but when there is nothing to show

          Shame on you ... buddy laughing
  11. -2
    30 September 2019 12: 11
    I don’t understand why we need these bases, what is the use of them?
    -sad’s salvation?
    well, we saved him, then what, why do we need him? to have influence in Syria :) from which one loss :(
    we have nothing to take in Syria and nothing to sell to them (besides, they have no money). Of course, we can, according to a well-established scheme, give money to borrow so that we can buy weapons, and then forgive the debt. well ... so-so business.
    -to "control middle-earth". Hooray! Hooray! Hooray!
    what kind of control - will we boarding galleons with gold and capture slaves on both coasts until the very altar? what the hell is not joking, but I doubt it. we are transporting oil through the Mediterranean Sea to Europe and no one is hindering this export by force; piracy in the Mediterranean Sea has also long been over. so what remains is a flag demonstration - a dubious waste of money in a falling economy.
    -the ability to hit the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles. bang bang!
    such ideas are generally strange to discuss, but I will try. the opportunity to hit the straits, yellowstone or the Eiffel Tower we had, is and will be without these bases. like the opposite side - the opportunity to hit the Kremlin or the estate of Santa Claus. everyone understands this, so they will never decide on such a thing. Well, actually, from the Crimea or Novorossiysk to the straits is much closer than with Khimeim and Tartus.
    1. 0
      3 October 2019 18: 19
      I don’t understand why we need these bases, what is the use of them?

      But big people know.
  12. +1
    30 September 2019 12: 25
    The base itself is perfectly protected from attack from all sides.

    I don’t like stupid bragging
    even to me, far from Syria, it is clear that the base is far from perfect.
    the protection work was carried out serious and almost close to a reasonable maximum,
    but one should not impose false illusions that this is a "perfect" defense.
    Otherwise, mortars would not have fired at the base.
  13. -1
    30 September 2019 14: 15
    A little more than two weeks have passed since the moment when the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stated that the war in Syria is over

    Again? SAA fighters everywhere went to the state border of the SAR, and the Syrian border guards took it under protection? Have the Americans and their henchmen gone home? Turks too? Hmeimim are attacking single "enthusiasts" with rockets and drones?
    Lavrov's statements and the reaction of his "listeners" are reminiscent of a well-known plot from the humorous program "Gorodok":
  14. +2
    30 September 2019 15: 09
    Against the background of memories of the "flight" from the bases of the army and navy in Asia and Africa at the time of the incompetent cutting of Ebn and comp. the creation of naval and air force bases is very encouraging! Those. course Putin and Shoigu chose the right one!
  15. -1
    30 September 2019 18: 13
    As far as I am aware of the greatest discomfort to students from student construction teams, all sorts of people of Caucasian nationality with red berets on their heads deliver, when they arrive, they shmon on the subject of alcohol-containing drinks, upon arrival from the DB, there is also a shmon, etc., etc. As one friend of mine, who passed both Chechen ones, said, Well, they arrived, the ramp opened, the sun was in my eyes, and these are standing (there are a lot of points further). In short, they are very irritating and irritating to the nerves; several times it almost came to a shootout. Moreover, the guys themselves in red berets are not particularly eager to fight, and they are not capable, because they’re cowards in life, and they haven’t even heard about tactics, but to look at the order is theirs, even small, but POWER. Well, besides, there are not enough women. If ours have decided to take an example from amers and other bourgeoisie in providing military personnel at foreign bases, then why are girls being brought in? Amers, for example, always have girls at their bases in Afghanistan, according to the state, and the contingent regularly changes, there are Filipinos, and Vietnamese, and Thai, and Russian, and Khokhlushka, and Moldavians. In short, for every taste, and all this is absolutely free and with prezoms included. And there are bars, by the way. This I understand, concern for the life and recreation of servicemen. And ours only have concerts and sporting events.
    1. +1
      1 October 2019 10: 52
      Quote: Russian Central Asia
      absolutely free and with prezami included. And there are bars, by the way. I understand that
      With such a level of understanding, one had to go straight to the dating site: criticism of the authorities from this angle, I believe, will have a greater effect.
      1. -1
        2 October 2019 00: 14
        Well, well, Mr. Sniper, calm down, otherwise you are as sharp as diarrhea. Why on earth do you hang people up labels. If the Russian Defense Ministry is conducting a commercial special campaign in Syria in the interests of third or fourth interested parties and countries, then people directly involved in the database have the full right to demand from the sponsors and customers this special suit so that they provide their living conditions and complete rest , including here and night butterflies. Moreover, in comparison with the cost of this war, for example, for one flight hour of the same SU-35, even a simple patrol, without consuming ammunition, these are just pennies, it’s worthwhile to save on this. And then you know the bloody corns on the palms, they greatly reduce the combat readiness of the personnel. Or do you think that our military should change their orientation during their stay in Syria. laughing
        1. +1
          2 October 2019 09: 57
          Quote: Russian Central Asia
          Why on earth do you hang people up labels.
          You do not confuse anything about shortcuts?
          Quote: Russian Central Asia
          you are sharp as diarrhea.
          Here is a shortcut that you sculpt me to the sound of the waves, accusing of hanging labels. Can you present something like this from my comment? Free advice on going to a dating site? This is not a shortcut, but good advice to everyone who shows sexual concern and disorientation on the forum with the simple integrity of a slide projector. You can choose a shortcut yourself.
        2. 0
          3 October 2019 06: 06
          Quote: Russian Central Asia
          and rest in full, including here and fitting butterflies.

          And what, local Syrians are not taken into account? I wonder if our men, handsome men, are in demand among local women.
          1. +1
            8 October 2019 12: 42
            Well, first of all, the local woman is strongly fond of, and the authorities, as always, are afraid of all sorts of problems with the local population, as well as morality and all in the same vein, so it is strictly forbidden.
        3. 0
          3 October 2019 18: 34
          Or do you think that our military should change their orientation during their stay in Syria

          Now this is not bad. On the contrary, the Russian Federation may gain approval from Europe. Will be in the G8.
          1. 0
            8 October 2019 12: 51
            Well, as far as I understand, the top leadership is generally in favor, oh, the men who do all the work there are somehow against it, they are not ready for such a radical change
          2. 0
            9 October 2019 00: 47
            if you look from the point of view of leadership, then undoubtedly, this would definitely be a positive factor. As you know, people obsessed with some kind of vice almost always try to draw other people into this vicious passion. But the problem is that our ordinary men, who are not from the leadership, are somehow not ready for this laughing
    2. 0
      3 October 2019 18: 31
      girls are not imported

      Morality will not be allowed. Apparently, it is connected that the Russian army, the inheritance from the army of the USSR from which it inherited, has a charter, traditions and moral of the union in which there was no sex.
      1. 0
        8 October 2019 12: 47
        Well, as far as I know, this is our first commercial war game, in the style of respected Western partners. So if you decide to take an example from senior comrades, let them take an example in everything, otherwise it somehow doesn’t work out humanly.
  16. 0
    10 October 2019 23: 54
    Good article.
    Quote: Alexander Staver
    The war in Syria is over ...
    Yes, one as a whole is finished, only the other begins. And there it seems to go further in a circle.